Understanding of safety monitoring in clinical trials by individuals with CF or their parents: A qualitative analysis

Transparency, trust and minimizing burden to increase recruitment and retention in trials: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To describe patient perspectives on recruitment and retention in clinical trials.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Systematic review of qualitative studies that reported the perspective of adult patients with any health condition who accepted or declined to participate in clinical trials.

RESULTS

Sixty-three articles involving 1681 adult patients were included. Six themes were identified. Four themes reflected barriers: ambiguity of context and benefit - patients were unaware of the research question and felt pressured in making decisions; lacking awareness of opportunities - some believed health professionals obscured trials opportunities, or felt confused because of language barriers; wary of added burden - patients were without capacity because of sickness or competing priorities; and skepticism, fear and mistrust - patients feared loss of privacy, were suspicious of doctor's motivation, afraid of being a guinea pig, and disengaged from not knowing outcomes. Two themes captured facilitators: building confidence - patients hoped for better treatment, were supported from family members and trusted medical staff; and social gains and belonging to the community - altruism, a sense of belonging and peer encouragement motivated participation in trials.

CONCLUSION

Improving the visibility and transparency of trials, supporting informed decision making, minimizing burden, and ensuring confidence and trust may improve patient participation in trials.

Perceptions of safety monitoring in CF clinical studies and potential impact on future study participation

BACKGROUND

Individuals with CF and their parents cite safety concerns as barriers to participating in clinical studies. We assessed whether a brochure/infographic describing patient safety monitoring processes could reduce knowledge and attitude barriers regarding safety monitoring. We also identified factors associated with likely participation in future CF studies.

METHODS

Respondents from three CF centers in the U.S. were randomly assigned to receive the safety monitoring brochure/infographic or an unrelated brochure. Fifty parents of children with CF <16, 50 adolescents with CF 16-21, and 50 adults with CF ≥22 years old were recruited to complete the study survey. Factors associated with survey responses and with reported likelihood of participating in future studies were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall the safety monitoring brochure/infographic was associated with increased likelihood of future participation in non-drug studies (aOR 2.30, CI₉₅ 1.01-5.28), but not in drug studies. Non-Hispanic respondents reported greater likelihood of participating in a future drug study than Hispanic respondents (aOR 3.18, CI₉₅ 1.30-7.74). Adults with CF (aOR 2.62, CI₉₅ 1.05-6.51) and parents (aOR 4.49, CI₉₅ 1.66-12.15) were more likely than adolescents to report they would ask their care team about clinical trials. Confidence in safety monitoring was associated with reported likelihood of future participation in drug studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential future participation in CF drug and/or non-drug studies was associated with respondent age and ethnicity, receiving the safety monitoring brochure/infographic, and confidence in safety monitoring. Our findings underscore the need for education about safety monitoring, with targeted approaches for the Hispanic CF population and adolescents.

Cystic fibrosis year in review 2018, part 2

Cystic fibrosis (CF) research and case reports were robust in the year 2018. This report summarizes publications related the multisystem effects of CF, pulmonary exacerbations, new and expanded therapies other than cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator studies, and patient-reported priorities and outcomes.