Rate and predictors of prescription of lumacaftor – Ivacaftor in the 18 months following approval in the United States

Beyond the 10%: Unraveling the genetic diversity in Turkish cystic fibrosis patients not eligible for CFTR modulators

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by variants of CFTR gene. Over 2000 variants have been identified, and new drugs called CFTR modulators have been developed to target specific defects in the CFTR protein. However, these drugs are only suitable for patients with certain variants of CFTR, and eligibility rates vary depending on race and geographical region. This study aimed to reveal the detailed genotype and clinical characteristics of people with CF (pwCF) at our center in Turkey, a developing country, who are not eligible for CFTR modulators.

METHODS

A total of 445 pwCF followed up at Marmara University were reviewed retrospectively. Variants of the patients ineligible to CFTR modulators were classified based on American College of Medical Genetics guidelines, CFTR classification, the change in the encoded protein, and the variant type.

RESULTS

The study revealed that 139 (31.2%) patients weren't eligible for CFTR modulators. There were 60 different variants in the 276 alleles, as two were missing. The majority of patients had missense or nonsense variants, and that the most common variant was c.1545_1546del, which can be said unique to this geography.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the importance of detecting the variants of ineligible patients in detail to guide future approaches for more targeted and effective interventions in CF care. Testing the effectiveness of CFTR modulators for rare or newly occurring variants is crucial to ensure equal access for pwCF to these therapies from different racial backgrounds and ethnic minorities.

Impact of the expanded label for elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis with no F508del variant in the USA

BACKGROUND

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), which is approved for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) with a F508del variant, was further approved based on in vitro data in the USA for those carrying at least one of 177 rare CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) variants.

METHODS

PwCF, aged ≥6 years, carrying no F508del variant but with at least one of these 177 rare variants, were identified within the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) between 2020 and 2022. The evolution of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) percentage predicted and rates of pulmonary exacerbations were analysed over the first year following ETI initiation, using a linear regression with generalised estimating equations and a negative binomial model, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 1791 individuals aged ≥6 years with rare CFTR variants were eligible for ETI, corresponding to 5.2% of CFFPR participants. 815 individuals (45.5%), of which 57.9% were already treated with another CFTR modulator, initiated ETI within the first 2 years following approval. Individuals with more severe respiratory disease were more likely to initiate ETI, whereas those previously treated with another CFTR modulator or those with no private insurance coverage had less ETI initiation. ETI initiation was associated with an increase in mean FEV1 % pred by +3.39 (95% CI 2.14-4.64) and a decrease in the rates of pulmonary exacerbations (adjusted rate ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.79). These effects were greater in individuals naïve of previous CFTR modulators.

CONCLUSIONS

Extension of the ETI label to rare CFTR variants is associated with meaningful improvements in lung function and a marked reduction in pulmonary exacerbations.

CFTR modulator therapy: transforming the landscape of clinical care in cystic fibrosis

Following discovery of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene in 1989 and subsequent elucidation of the varied CFTR protein abnormalities that result, a new era of cystic fibrosis management has emerged-one in which scientific principles translated from the bench to the bedside have enabled us to potentially treat the basic defect in the majority of children and adults with cystic fibrosis, with a resultant burgeoning adult cystic fibrosis population. However, the long-term effects of these therapies on the multiple manifestations of cystic fibrosis are still under investigation. Understanding the effects of modulators in populations excluded from clinical trials is also crucial. Furthermore, establishing appropriate disease measures to assess efficacy in the youngest potential trial participants and in those whose post-modulator lung function is in the typical range for people without chronic lung disease is essential for continued drug development. Finally, recognising that a health outcome gap has been created for some people and widened for others who are not eligible for, cannot tolerate, or do not have access to modulators is important.

Aiming to Improve Equity in Pulmonary Health: Cystic Fibrosis

This review summarizes the evidence of health disparities in cystic fibrosis (CF), an autosomal recessive genetic disorder with substantial variation in disease progression and outcomes. We review disparities by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographic location, gender identity, or sexual orientation documented in the literature. We outline the mechanisms that generate and perpetuate such disparities across levels and domains of influence and assess the implications of this evidence. We then recommend strategies for improving equity in CF outcomes, drawing on recommendations for the general population and considering approaches specific to people living with CF.

Socioeconomic determinants of respiratory health in patients with cystic fibrosis: implications for treatment strategies

INTRODUCTION

Great variation exists in the progression and outcomes of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease, due to both genetic and environmental influences. Social determinants mediate environmental exposures and treatment success; people with CF from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds have worse health and die younger than those in more advantaged positions.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the literature on the mechanisms that are responsible for generating and sustaining disparities in CF health, and the ways by which social determinants translate into health advantages or disadvantages in people with CF. The authors make recommendations for addressing social risk factors in CF clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Socioeconomic factors are not dichotomous and their impact is felt at every step of the social ladder. CF care programs need to adopt a systematic protocol to screen for health-related social risk factors, and then connect patients to available resources to meet individual needs. Considerations such as daycare, schooling options, living and working conditions, and opportunities for physical exercise and recreation as well as promotion of self-efficacy are often overlooked. In addition, advocacy for changes in public policies on health insurance, environmental regulations, social welfare, and education would all help address the root causes of CF health inequities.

Left behind: The potential impact of CFTR modulators on racial and ethnic disparities in cystic fibrosis

The advent of CFTR modulators, a genomic specific medication, revolutionized the treatment of CF for many patients. However, given that these therapeutics were only developed for specific CFTR mutations, not all people with CF have access to such disease-modifying drugs. Racial and ethnic minority groups are less likely to have CFTR mutations that are approved for CFTR modulators. This exclusion has the potential to widen existing health disparities.

Survey of patients with cystic fibrosis and caregivers decisions regarding CFTR modulators

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators are a novel approach to CF management that has become more readily available chronic CF therapies for certain populations of patients with CF. A cross-sectional survey of adults with CF and caregivers of pediatric patients with CF was done in two CF Centers to better understand the decision-making process including the potential influence of social media, CF care-teams, and family members on their decision whether to begin a CFTR modulator. For the 90 participants, the most common influences in the decision to start modulator therapy were the CF providers/care teams (n = 63), parents (n = 49), and individuals with CF (n = 27). The most impactful influence in the decision-making process were providers/care team (n = 47) and parents (n = 18). Social media was an influence for only 12 respondents, with an overall positive impact. Information from the CF Foundation was an influence for 12 participants and the main influence for six participants. The most common reasons for stopping lumacaftor-ivacaftor were having tezacaftor-ivacaftor as an option (n = 25) and side-effects (n = 15). Family and CF clinicians were the two main influences on the decision to initiate modulator therapy. CF clinicians were seen to be the most influential source. Social media had less influence on the decision-making process than expected despite the wide presence of the CF community online.

Patients eligible for modulator drugs: Data from cystic fibrosis registry of Turkey

BACKGROUND

A better understanding of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator biology has led to the development of modulator drugs such as ivacaftor, lumacaftor-ivacaftor, tezacaftor-ivacaftor, and elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. This cross-sectional study evaluated cystic fibrosis (CF) patients eligible for modulator drugs.

METHODS

Data for age and genetic mutations from the Cystic Fibrosis Registry of Turkey collected in 2018 were used to find out the number of patients who are eligible for modulator therapy.

RESULTS

Of registered 1488 CF patients, genetic analysis was done for 1351. The numbers and percentages of patients and names of the drugs, that the patients are eligible for, are as follows: 122 (9.03%) for ivacaftor, 156 (11.54%) for lumacaftor-ivacaftor, 163 (11.23%) for tezacaftor-ivacaftor, and 57 (4.21%) for elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. Among 1351 genotyped patients total of 313 (23.16%) patients are eligible for currently licensed modulator therapies (55 patients were shared by ivacaftor and tezacaftor-ivacaftor, 108 patients were shared by lumacaftor-ivacaftor and tezacaftor-ivacaftor, and 22 patients were shared by tezacaftor-ivacaftor and elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor groups).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that approximately one-fourth of the registered CF patients in Turkey are eligible for modulator drugs. As, frequent mutations that CF patients have in Turkey are different from North American and European CF patients, developing modulator drugs effective for those mutations is necessary. Furthermore, as modulator drugs are very expensive currently, financial support of the government in developing countries like Turkey is noteworthy.

Cystic fibrosis year in review 2018, part 1

Cystic fibrosis research and case reports were robust in the year 2018. This report summarizes research and cases related to Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies, inflammation and infection, epidemiology and the physiologic, and imaging assessment of disease.