Low body mass index as a barrier to lung transplant in cystic fibrosis

Linkage of the CF Foundation Patient Registry with the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database

BACKGROUND

The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) maintains clinical data, including history of solid organ transplant, on people with cystic fibrosis (CF) who obtain care at CF Foundation-accredited care centers. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database is a collection of national data related to organ transplantation that supports research to evaluate solid organ transplant candidate and recipient outcomes.

METHODS

Individuals in the CFFPR were matched to SRTR records using an algorithm that compared names, last four digits of social security numbers, date of birth and date of death. We evaluated match quality by summarizing the extent to which transplant status agreed between the two data sources by organ and year of listing or transplant. We summarized CFFPR-reported characteristics for lung and liver transplants in the year prior to transplant.

RESULTS

A total of 7,594 individuals who participated in the CFFPR matched SRTR records with approximately 75% having at least one transplant record in SRTR. Over 97% of the matched population had a CF diagnosis reported to SRTR. In total, 5,253 people were identified as lung transplant recipients and 499 as liver transplant recipients in SRTR. Clinical characteristics for lung and liver transplants were consistent with the epidemiology of transplantation for people with CF.

CONCLUSIONS

Linkage of the two data sources was successful, with high agreement between them supporting the use of the matched population as a valid resource to study transplantation in CF, particularly leveraging pre-transplant characteristics (collected in CFFPR) with detailed transplant data (collected in SRTR).

Lung transplant referral considerations for individuals with cystic fibrosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The cystic fibrosis (CF) Foundation issued guidelines to promote timely lung transplant referral for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) in 2019. Since then more has been published to help refine this complex decision. The goal of this review is to summarize the recent literature informing disease severity in CF, barriers to referral for pwCF and guide timely and appropriate lung transplant referrals.

RECENT FINDINGS

Existing guidelines utilize the degree of airflow limitation as the primary criteria to refer for lung transplant, yet this variable has some prognostic uncertainty. Novel prognostic tools may provide more reliable metrics for predicting who with CF is at greatest risk of dying from their lung disease and could be used as an indicator for when to refer. In addition, updated analyses of national registry data have highlighted the significance of hemoptysis, low body mass index, and extra-pulmonary organ failure, as important prognostic markers. PwCF with these complications have historically been under-referred for lung transplant despite data suggesting lung transplant can be safe for some in these populations. Early referral should be considered in the presence of these complications.

SUMMARY

This review builds on existing guidelines by incorporating novel data to better determine when lung transplant referral is most appropriate. Improved prognostic tools are still needed to decrease the chances of pwCF dying without consideration of lung transplant. It is still unclear how novel therapies for CF may change the need and timing for lung transplant referral.

ESPEN-ESPGHAN-ECFS guideline on nutrition care for cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Nutritional status is paramount in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and is directly correlated with morbidity and mortality. The first ESPEN-ESPGHAN-ECFS guidelines on nutrition care for infants, children, and adults with CF were published in 2016. An update to these guidelines is presented.

METHODS

The study was developed by an international multidisciplinary working group in accordance with officially accepted standards. Literature since 2016 was reviewed, PICO questions were discussed and the GRADE system was utilized. Statements were discussed and submitted for on-line voting by the Working Group and by all ESPEN members.

RESULTS

The Working Group updated the nutritional guidelines including assessment and management at all ages. Supplementation of vitamins and pancreatic enzymes remains largely the same. There are expanded chapters on pregnancy, CF-related liver disease, and CF-related diabetes, bone disease, nutritional and mineral supplements, and probiotics. There are new chapters on nutrition with highly effective modulator therapies and nutrition after organ transplantation.

Malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty assessment in pediatric transplantation

Nutrition assessment can be challenging in children with end-stage organ disease and in those requiring an organ transplant. The effect of poor nutrition status can exert long-lasting effects on children with end-stage organ disease requiring transplantation. Malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty are conditions that require provision of optimal nutrition to prevent or support the treatment of these conditions. Unfortunately, the literature on the assessment of malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty in pediatric end-stage organ disease is scarce, thus leading to confusion on how to effectively identify them. Recently, the addition of a variety of validated nutrition and functional assessment techniques has assisted with appropriate assessment of these conditions. The objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the current literature for pediatric assessment of malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty in the setting of solid organ transplantation and provide practicing nutrition clinicians a solid foundation for learning how to effectively assess these conditions with the current literature available.

Cystic fibrosis year in review 2022

Remarkable medical advancements have been made for people with cystic fibrosis (CF) in recent years, with an abundance of research continuing to be conducted worldwide. With concern for limitations in access to highly effective CFTR modulators, as well as the recent Coronavirus Disease-19 pandemic, there has been a consistent effort to understand and improve CF screening, disease burden, diagnosis, and management. Our aim in this review is to present articles from 2022 with an emphasis on clinically relevant studies. We hope this will serve as a broad overview of the research published in the past year.

The Lung Transplant Candidate, Indications, Timing, and Selection Criteria

Lung transplantation can be lifesaving for patients with advanced lung disease. Demographics are evolving with recipients now sicker but determining candidacy remains predicated on one's underlying lung disease prognosis, along with the likelihood of posttransplant success. Determining optimal timing can be challenging, and most programs favor initiating the process early and proactively to allow time for patient education, informed decision-making, and preparation. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation is used to elucidate disease progrnosis and identify risk factors for poor posttransplant outcomes. Candidacy criteria vary significantly by center, and close communication between referring and transplant providers is necessary to improve access to transplant and outcomes.

Survival difference between high-risk and low-risk CFTR genotypes after lung transplant

BACKGROUND

While cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) genotypes are associated with clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis patients, it is unknown if genotype impacts lung transplant outcomes. We sought to compare lung transplant survival and time to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) between high-risk, low-risk, and not yet classified CFTR genotypes.

METHODS

We used merged data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (2005-2017) and United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (2005-2016). Cox Proportional Hazards models compared graft failure after lung transplant and time to BOS among high-risk, low-risk, and not yet classified risk CFTR genotype classes.

RESULTS

Among 1,830 cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients, median survival for those with low-risk, high-risk, and not yet classified genotype was 9.83, 6.25, and 5.75 years, respectively. Adjusted Cox models showed recipients with a low-risk genotype had 39% lower risk of death or re-transplant compared to those with high-risk genotype (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI = 0.40, 0.91). A subset of 1,585 lung transplant recipients were included in the BOS subgroup analysis. Adjusted analyses showed no significant difference of developing BOS among high-risk, low-risk, or not yet classified genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplant recipients with low-risk CFTR genotype have better survival after transplant compared to recipients with high-risk or not yet classified genotypes. Given these differences, future studies evaluating the mechanism by which CFTR genotype affects post-transplant survival could identify potential targets for intervention.