Early B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Change in HFrEF Patients Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan: A Pooled Analysis of EVALUATE-HF and PROVE-HF

Recommendations for the use of natriuretic peptides for early diagnosis of heart disease in patients with diabetes: A consensus report by SPEDM, SPC, NEDM-SPMI and APMGF

Diabetes mellitus is a significant risk factor for the development of heart disease (HD), with heart failure (HF) being one of the early manifestations of the disease in this population. The diagnostic process is challenging and contributes to a significant number of undiagnosed cases of HD among individuals with diabetes. This is largely due to the non-specific nature of symptoms and signs in the initial stages of disease, making early detection elusive. Timely identification and prevention of HD in patients with diabetes have the potential to significantly improve patient prognosis and alleviate the growing burden of this population on the national healthcare system. Natriuretic peptides (BNP and NT-proBNP) have been recognized as reliable, cost-effective biomarkers for detecting HD and can be further used as risk assessment biomarkers in asymptomatic patients. Despite being recommended in several European and American guidelines to rule-out and rule-in HF, the routine use of these biomarkers for the diagnosis of HDs in patients with diabetes has only recently been proposed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and has not yet been implemented in Portugal. Therefore, a multidisciplinary panel of experts from four medical societies, the Portuguese Society of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, the Diabetes Study Group from the Portuguese Society of Internal Medicine and the Portuguese Association of Family Medicine were convened to discuss and establish consensus recommendations for natriuretic peptide screening in patients with diabetes and its integration into routine diabetes management protocols. This manuscript draws on the consensus recommendations from four Portuguese medical societies, offering clear guidance on natriuretic peptides use tailored to Portuguese clinical practice. Accordingly, this consensus advises the use of NT-proBNP analysis for all patients with diabetes aged 50 years and older, or under 50 if they have risk factors and/or comorbidities. Adjusted rule-out and rule-in values for age, sex and risk factors are provided. NT-proBNP levels above 125 pg/mL should prompt additional testing and cardiovascular investigation. Routine evaluation every two to three years for low-risk patients and annually for high-risk patients is proposed when NT-proBNP is below 125 pg/mL and in the absence of suspected heart disease.

Potential Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on the Cardio-ankle Vascular Index in Hypertensive Patients

Objective Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) have been widely used as a treatment for heart failure. However, they have only been approved for the treatment of hypertension in a limited number of countries. We investigated the effect of ARNIs on arterial stiffness using the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) in patients with hypertension to reveal the mechanism underlying cardiovascular interaction. Methods We investigated the utility of ARNIs in patients in whom arterial stiffness was assessed using the CAVI before and after ARNI administration. Patients In this retrospective observational study, we enrolled 50 patients with hypertension treated with ARNIs between January 2021 and 2023. Forty-eight of the 50 patients (96%) were switched from angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) due to inadequate antihypertensive control. Results The systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, and CAVI were significantly decreased by ARNI administration (systolic BP: 145 [135, 162] to 131 [123, 143] mmHg [p=0.000]; diastolic BP: 92 [78, 100] to 82 [74, 89] mmHg [p=0.000]; and CAVI: 9.9 [9.1, 10.5] to 9.5 [8.8, 10.2] mmHg [p=0.005], respectively). Conclusion Hypertension treatment with ARNIs may improve not only the blood pressure but also the CAVI, reducing the afterload on the heart.

Advances in heart failure monitoring: Biosensors targeting molecular markers in peripheral bio-fluids

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), especially chronic heart failure, threaten many patients' lives worldwide. Because of its slow course and complex causes, its clinical screening, diagnosis, and prognosis are essential challenges. Clinical biomarkers and biosensor technologies can rapidly screen and diagnose. Multiple types of biomarkers are employed for screening purposes, precise diagnosis, and treatment follow-up. This article provides an up-to-date overview of the biomarkers associated with the six main heart failure etiology pathways. Plasma natriuretic peptides (BNP and NT-proBNP) and cardiac troponins (cTnT, cTnl) are still analyzed as gold-standard markers for heart failure. Other complementary biomarkers include growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), circulating Galactose Lectin 3 (Gal-3), soluble interleukin (sST2), C-reactive protein (CRP), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). For these biomarkers, the electrochemical biosensors have exhibited sufficient sensitivity, detection limit, and specificity. This review systematically summarizes the latest molecular biomarkers and sensors for heart failure, which will provide comprehensive and cutting-edge authoritative scientific information for biomedical and electronic-sensing researchers in the field of heart failure, as well as patients. In addition, our proposed future outlook may provide new research ideas for researchers.

The 'peptide for life' initiative in the emergency department study

AIMS

Natriuretic peptide (NP) uptake varies in Emergency Departments (EDs) across Europe. The 'Peptide for Life' (P4L) initiative, led by Heart Failure Association, aims to enhance NP utilization for early diagnosis of heart failure (HF). We tested the hypothesis that implementing an educational campaign in Western Balkan countries would significantly increase NP adoption rates in the ED.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This registry examined NP adoption before and after implementing the P4L-ED study across 10 centres in five countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia. A train-the-trainer programme was implemented to enhance awareness of NP testing in the ED, and centres without access received point-of-care instruments. Differences in NP testing between the pre-P4L-ED and post-P4L-ED phases were evaluated. A total of 2519 patients were enrolled in the study: 1224 (48.6%) in the pre-P4L-ED phase and 1295 (51.4%) in the post-P4L-ED phase. NP testing was performed in the ED on 684 patients (55.9%) during the pre-P4L-ED phase and on 1039 patients (80.3%) during the post-P4L-ED phase, indicating a significant absolute difference of 24.4% (95% CI: 20.8% to 27.9%, P < 0.001). The use of both NPs and echocardiography significantly increased from 37.7% in the pre-P4L-ED phase to 61.3% in the post-P4L-ED phase. There was an increased prescription of diuretics and SGLT2 inhibitors during the post-P4L-ED phase.

CONCLUSIONS

By increasing awareness and providing resources, the utilization of NPs increased in the ED, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy and enhanced patient care.

Patient phenotype profiling using echocardiography and natriuretic peptides to personalise heart failure therapy

Heart failure (HF) is a progressive condition with a clinical picture resulting from reduced cardiac output (CO) and/or elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressures (LVFP). The original Diamond-Forrester classification, based on haemodynamic data reflecting CO and pulmonary congestion, was introduced to grade severity, manage, and risk stratify advanced HF patients, providing evidence that survival progressively worsened for those classified as warm/dry, cold/dry, warm/wet, and cold/wet. Invasive haemodynamic evaluation in critically ill patients has been replaced by non-invasive haemodynamic phenotype profiling using echocardiography. Decreased CO is not infrequent among ambulatory HF patients with reduced ejection fraction, ranging from 23 to 45%. The Diamond-Forrester classification may be used in combination with the evaluation of natriuretic peptides (NPs) in ambulatory HF patients to pursue the goal of early identification of those at high risk of adverse events and personalise therapy to antagonise neurohormonal systems, reduce congestion, and preserve tissue/renal perfusion. The most benefit of the Guideline-directed medical treatment is to be expected in stable patients with the warm/dry profile, who more often respond with LV reverse remodelling, while more selective individualised treatments guided by echocardiography and NPs are necessary for patients with persisting congestion and/or tissue/renal hypoperfusion (cold/dry, warm/wet, and cold/wet phenotypes) to achieve stabilization and to avoid further neurohormonal activation, as a result of inappropriate use of vasodilating or negative chronotropic drugs, thus pursuing the therapeutic objectives. Therefore, tracking the haemodynamic status over time by clinical, imaging, and laboratory indicators helps implement therapy by individualising drug regimens and interventions according to patients' phenotypes even in an ambulatory setting.

Longitudinal Changes in Natriuretic Peptides and Reverse Cardiac Remodeling in Patients with Heart Failure Treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan Across the Left Ventricular Ejection Traction Spectrum

Sacubitril/valsartan improves outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. However, the relationship between longitudinal changes in natriuretic peptides and echocardiographic parameters in patients with HF treated with sacubitril/valsartan across the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) range is not fully understood.In patients with HF treated with sacubitril/valsartan, comprehensive data on natriuretic peptides, including atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), BNP, and echocardiography, were measured after 6 months of treatment. We assessed the change in natriuretic peptides and echocardiographic parameters in LVEF classification subgroups.Among 49 patients, the median ANP concentration increased from 55 pg/mL at baseline to 78 pg/mL (P < 0.001). The NT-proBNP concentration decreased from 250 pg/mL to 146 pg/mL (P < 0.001). No significant change was observed in the BNP concentration (P = 0.640). The trajectories of each natriuretic peptide in patients with LVEF > 40% (n = 22) were similar to those in individuals with LVEF ≤ 40% (n = 27). Regardless of LVEF classification, echocardiography at 6 months showed a significant improvement in LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/e'). The reduction in natriuretic peptide concentration was related to LV reverse remodeling and decreased left and right atrial pressures assessed by E/e' and inferior vena cava diameter.Sacubitril/valsartan induced an increase in ANP, a reduction in NT-proBNP, and no change in plasma BNP, regardless of LVEF. It caused LV reverse remodeling, and the natriuretic peptide concentration changes were associated with structural and functional echocardiographic parameters.

Practical algorithms for early diagnosis of heart failure and heart stress using NT-proBNP: A clinical consensus statement from the Heart Failure Association of the ESC

Diagnosing heart failure is often difficult due to the non-specific nature of symptoms, which can be caused by a range of medical conditions. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) have been recognized as important biomarkers for diagnosing heart failure. This document from the Heart Failure Association examines the practical uses of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in various clinical scenarios. The concentrations of NT-proBNP vary according to the patient profile and the clinical scenario, therefore values should be interpreted with caution to ensure appropriate diagnosis. Validated cut-points are provided to rule in or rule out acute heart failure in the emergency department and to diagnose de novo heart failure in the outpatient setting. We also coin the concept of 'heart stress' when NT-proBNP levels are elevated in an asymptomatic patient with risk factors for heart failure (i.e. diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease), underlying the development of cardiac dysfunction and further increased risk. We propose a simple acronym for healthcare professionals and patients, FIND-HF, which serves as a prompt to consider heart failure: Fatigue, Increased water accumulation, Natriuretic peptide testing, and Dyspnoea. Use of this acronym would enable the early diagnosis of heart failure. Overall, understanding and utilizing NT-proBNP levels will lead to earlier and more accurate diagnoses of heart failure ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.

The efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared with ACEI/ARB in the treatment of heart failure following acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose: To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (SV) by comparison with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for the treatment of heart failure caused by acute myocardial infarction (HF-AMI) based on current randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Several electronic databases were searched up to 27 May 2023. Primary endpoints were the efficacy including the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and 6-min walk test (6MWT) and secondary endpoints were the safety including the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and adverse reaction (AE). Results: A total of 14 RCTs were included and all patients were from China. Among included 1,991 patients, 997 patients received SVs and 994 patients received ACEIs/ARBs. The pooled results demonstrated that patients in the SV group showed significantly better efficacy representing as increased LVEF [weighted mean difference (WMD): 4.43%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.84%-6.02%, p < 0.001] and 6MWT (WMD: 30.84 m, 95% CI: 25.65 m-36.03 m, p < 0.001) and decreased LVEDD (WMD: -3.24 mm, 95% CI: -4.96 mm ∼ -1.52 mm, p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP (WMD: -188.12 pg/mL, 95% CI: -246.75 pg/mL ∼ 129.49 pg/mL, p < 0.001), which was also verified by subgroup analysis based on the history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Besides, the SV group showed significantly lower incidence rate of MACE [relative risk (RR): 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47-0.75, p < 0.001] and patients receiving SVs in the non-PCI group also showed lower incidence of AE (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20-0.71, p = 0.002). Conclusion: For the treatment of HF-AMI, SV is more effective and safer than ACEI/ARB based on current evidence, but more high-quality RCTs are still needed to verify above findings.

Lack of durable natriuresis and objective decongestion following SGLT2 inhibition in randomized controlled trials of patients with heart failure

Patients with heart failure have increased cardiac filling pressures, circulating natriuretic peptides, and physical signs of fluid retention, which are related to sodium retention by the kidneys and are alleviated by conventional diuretics. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors interfere with sodium and glucose reabsorption in the proximal renal tubule, but they evoke a marked counterregulatory activation of sodium and water reabsorption in distal nephron segments, which opposes and negates any diuretic effect. Nevertheless, it has been postulated that SGLT2 inhibitors modulate the volume set point, leading selectively to decongestion in patients with fluid overload. This hypothesis was tested in a review of 15 randomized controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure, with 7 trials focusing on urinary volume within the first week, and 8 trials focusing on objective decongestion at 12 weeks. In trials < 1 week, SGLT2 inhibition increased urine volume in the first 24 h, but typically without a change in urinary sodium excretion, and this diuresis was not sustained. In 8 trials of 12 weeks' duration, none reported alleviation of edema, ascites or pulmonary rales. The 2 trials that evaluated changes in left ventricular filling pressure noted no or small changes (1-2 mm Hg); the two trials that measured interstitial lung water or total blood volume found no effect; and 6 of the 7 trials found no decrease in circulating natriuretic peptides. Therefore, randomized controlled trials do not indicate that SGLT2 inhibitors produce a durable natriuresis or objective decongestion in patients with heart failure.

Changes in mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin during treatment with sacubitril/valsartan

AIMS

Adrenomedullin is a vasodilatory peptide with a role in microcirculatory and endothelial homeostasis. Adrenomedullin is a substrate for neprilysin and may therefore play a role in beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) was measured in 156 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with Sac/Val and 264 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) randomized to treatment with Sac/Val or valsartan. Echocardiography and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire results were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months in the HFrEF cohort. Median (Q1-Q3) baseline MR-proADM concentrations were 0.80 (0.59-0.99) nmol/L in HFrEF and 0.88 (0.68-1.20) nmol/L in HFpEF. After 12 weeks of treatment with Sac/Val, MR-proADM increased by median 49% in HFrEF and 60% in HFpEF, while there were no significant changes in valsartan-treated patients (median 2%). Greater increases in MR-proADM were associated with higher Sac/Val doses. Changes in MR-proADM correlated weakly with changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, cardiac troponin T and urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate. Increases in MR-proADM were associated with decreases in blood pressure, but not significantly associated with changes in echocardiographic parameters or health status.

CONCLUSIONS

MR-proAD concentrations rise substantially following treatment with Sac/Val, in contrast to no change from valsartan. Change in MR-proADM from neprilysin inhibition did not correlate with improvements in cardiac structure and function or health status. More data are needed regarding the role of adrenomedullin and its related peptides in the treatment of heart failure.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROVE-HF ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02887183, PARAMOUNT ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00887588.

Natriuretic peptides: role in the diagnosis and management of heart failure: a scientific statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America and Japanese Heart Failure Society

Natriuretic peptides, brain (B-type) natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are globally and most often used for the diagnosis of heart failure (HF). In addition, they can have an important complementary role in the risk stratification of its prognosis. Since the development of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), the use of natriuretic peptides as therapeutic agents has grown in importance. The present document is the result of the Trilateral Cooperation Project among the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Failure Society of America and the Japanese Heart Failure Society. It represents an expert consensus that aims to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date perspective on natriuretic peptides in the diagnosis and management of HF, with a focus on the following main issues: (1) history and basic research: discovery, production and cardiovascular protection; (2) diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers: acute HF, chronic HF, inclusion/endpoint in clinical trials, and natriuretic peptide-guided therapy; (3) therapeutic use: nesiritide (BNP), carperitide (ANP) and ARNIs; and (4) gaps in knowledge and future directions.

Natriuretic Peptides: Role in the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America and Japanese Heart Failure Society

Natriuretic peptides, brain (B-type) natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are globally and most often used for the diagnosis of heart failure (HF). In addition, they can have an important complementary role in the risk stratification of its prognosis. Since the development of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), the use of natriuretic peptides as therapeutic agents has grown in importance. The present document is the result of the Trilateral Cooperation Project among the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Failure Society of America and the Japanese Heart Failure Society. It represents an expert consensus that aims to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date perspective on natriuretic peptides in the diagnosis and management of HF, with a focus on the following main issues: (1) history and basic research: discovery, production and cardiovascular protection; (2) diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers: acute HF, chronic HF, inclusion/endpoint in clinical trials, and natriuretic peptides-guided therapy; (3) therapeutic use: nesiritide (BNP), carperitide (ANP) and ARNIs; and (4) gaps in knowledge and future directions.

Atrial Natriuretic Peptides as a Bridge between Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, and Amyloidosis of the Atria

ANP is mainly synthesized by the atria, and upon excretion, it serves two primary purposes: vasodilation and increasing the renal excretion of sodium and water. The understanding of ANP's role in cardiac systems has improved considerably in recent decades. This review focuses on several studies demonstrating the importance of analyzing the regulations between the endocrine and mechanical function of the heart and emphasizes the effect of ANP, as the primary hormone of the atria, on atrial fibrillation (AF) and related diseases. The review first discusses the available data on the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ANP and then explains effect of ANP on heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) and vice versa, where tracking ANP levels could lead to understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms operating in these diseases. Second, it focuses on conventional treatments for AF, such as cardioversion and catheter ablation, and their effects on cardiac endocrine and mechanical function. Finally, it provides a point of view about the delayed recovery of cardiac mechanical and endocrine function after cardioversion, which can contribute to the occurrence of acute heart failure, and the potential impact of restoration of the sinus rhythm by extensive ablation or surgery in losing ANP-producing sites. Overall, ANP plays a key role in heart failure through its effects on vasodilation and natriuresis, leading to a decrease in the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, but it is crucial to understand the intimate role of ANP in HF and AF to improve their diagnosis and personalizing the patients' treatment.

Mechanisms of current therapeutic strategies for heart failure: more questions than answers?

Heart failure (HF) is a complex, multifactorial and heterogeneous syndrome with substantial mortality and morbidity. Over the last few decades, numerous attempts have been made to develop targeted therapies that may attenuate the known pathophysiological pathways responsible for causing the progression of HF. However, therapies developed with this objective have sometimes failed to show benefit. The pathophysiological construct of HF with numerous aetiologies suggests that interventions with broad mechanisms of action which simultaneously target more than one pathway maybe more effective in improving the outcomes of patients with HF. Indeed, current therapeutics with clinical benefits in HF have targeted a wider range of intermediate phenotypes. Despite extensive scientific breakthroughs in HF research recently, questions persist regarding the ideal therapeutic targets which may help achieve maximum benefit. In this review, we evaluate the mechanism of action of current therapeutic strategies, the pathophysiological pathways they target and highlight remaining knowledge gaps regarding the mode of action of these interventions.

Molecular mechanisms of sacubitril/valsartan in cardiac remodeling

Cardiovascular diseases have become a major clinical burden globally. Heart failure is one of the diseases that commonly emanates from progressive uncontrolled hypertension. This gives rise to the need for a new treatment for the disease. Sacubitril/valsartan is a new drug combination that has been approved for patients with heart failure. This review aims to detail the mechanism of action for sacubitril/valsartan in cardiac remodeling, a cellular and molecular process that occurs during the development of heart failure. Accumulating evidence has unveiled the cardioprotective effects of sacubitril/valsartan on cellular and molecular modulation in cardiac remodeling, with recent large-scale randomized clinical trials confirming its supremacy over other traditional heart failure treatments. However, its molecular mechanism of action in cardiac remodeling remains obscure. Therefore, comprehending the molecular mechanism of action of sacubitril/valsartan could help future research to study the drug's potential therapy to reduce the severity of heart failure.