Prognostic Value of Time in Blood Pressure Target Range Among Patients With Heart Failure

Blood Pressure Time in Target Range and its Impact on Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the concept of time in target range for blood pressure (BP) management, exploring its calculation methods, implications for patient outcomes, and potential use in patient care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent post-hoc analyses of clinical trials and observational studies highlight the importance of BP time in target range in predicting cardiovascular outcomes. Higher time in target range correlates with reduced risks of major adverse cardiovascular events including heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Additionally, longer time in target range decreases the risk of incident atrial fibrillation and risk of developing dementia. BP time in target range is a novel metric offering valuable insights into BP control and its impact on clinical outcomes. Higher time in target range is consistently associated with better cardiovascular outcomes across various patient populations. However, the clinical application of BP time in target range requires further investigation through prospective clinical trials and real-world studies. Integrating wearable devices for continuous BP monitoring could enhance the practical utility of BP time in target range in hypertension management.

Blood pressure time at target and its prognostic value for cardiovascular outcomes: a scoping review

The proportion of time that blood pressure (BP) readings are at treatment target levels, commonly referred to as time at target or time in therapeutic range (BP-TTR), is emerging as a useful measure for evaluating hypertension management effectiveness and assessing longitudinal BP control. However, method of determination for BP-TTR differs across studies. This review identifies variations in BP-TTR determination methodologies and its potential prognostic value for cardiovascular outcomes. Following PRISMA extension for scoping reviews guidelines, literature was systematically searched in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Relevant clinical trials, observational studies, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and systematic reviews published in English were screened. Of 369 articles identified, 17 articles were included. Studies differed in the BP targets used (e.g., BP < 140/90 mmHg or 130/80 mmHg; systolic BP within 110-130 mmHg or 120-140 mmHg), BP-TTR measurement duration (range 24 h to 15 years), and calculation method (linear interpolation method, n = 12 [71%]; proportion of BP readings at target, n = 5 [29%]). Regardless of method, studies consistently demonstrated that higher BP-TTR was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular outcomes. Six of eight studies found the association was independent of mean achieved BP or last measured BP. Despite variation in methods of BP-TTR determination, these studies demonstrated the potential prognostic value of BP-TTR for cardiovascular outcomes beyond current BP control measures. We recommend standardization of BP-TTR methodology, with preference for linear interpolation method when BP measurements are few or less frequent, and proportion of BP readings method when large number of BP readings are available.

Combined effect of time in target range and variability of systolic blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with hypertension: A prospective cohort study

Time in target range (TTR) and blood pressure variability (BPV) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) are independent risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality in hypertensive patients. However, the association of the combination of low TTR and high BPV of SBP with the risk of MACE and all-cause mortality is unclear. This study sought to investigate the combined effect of the TTR and BPV on the risk of MACE and all-cause mortality in patients with hypertension. A total of 11 496 hypertensive patients from the Kailuan cohort study were included in our study. All participants were divided into four groups according to their TTR and BPV levels. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for incident MACE and all-cause mortality. During a median follow-up of 5.64 years, 839 MACEs (included 99 cases of myocardial infarction, 591 cases of stroke, and 191 cases of heart failure) and 621 deaths occurred. Compared with the high-TTR and low-BPV group, the HRs (95% CI) of MACE and all-cause mortality were 1.309 (1.025-1.671) and 1.842 (1.373-2.473) for the high-TTR and high-BPV group, 1.692 (1.347-2.125) and 1.731 (1.298-2.309) for the low-TTR & low-BPV group, 2.132 (1.728-2.629) and 2.247 (1.722-2.932) for the low-TTR & high-BPV group. Our study suggests that the combination of low TTR and high BPV of SBP was associated with a higher risk of MACE and all-cause mortality in patients with hypertension.

Blood pressure and heart failure: focused on treatment

Heart failure (HF) remains a significant global health burden, and hypertension is known to be the primary contributor to its development. Although aggressive hypertension treatment can prevent heart changes in at-risk patients, determining the optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in cases diagnosed with HF is challenging owing to insufficient evidence. Notably, hypertension is more strongly associated with HF with preserved ejection fraction than with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Patients with acute hypertensive HF exhibit sudden symptoms of acute HF, especially those manifested with severely high BP; however, no specific vasodilator therapy has proven beneficial for this type of acute HF. Since the majority of medications used to treat HF contribute to lowering BP, and BP remains one of the most important hemodynamic markers, targeted BP management is very concerned in treatment strategies. However, no concrete guidelines exist, prompting a trend towards optimizing therapies to within tolerable ranges, rather than setting explicit BP goals. This review discusses the connection between BP and HF, explores its pathophysiology through clinical studies, and addresses its clinical significance and treatment targets.

Time in target range of systolic blood pressure and cognitive outcomes in patients with hypertension

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure (BP) is a dynamic measure that fluctuates over time. However, conventional BP control indicators may not adequately reflect the variability of BP during a period of time.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), which compared systolic blood pressure (SBP) targets of <120 mmHg (intensive) and <140 mmHg (standard) among patients with hypertension and high cardiac risks. The target ranges were defined as 110 to 130 mmHg in intensive treatment arm and 120 to 140 mmHg in standard treatment arm, respectively. Time in target range (TTR) was calculated based on SBP measurements recorded during the first 3-month follow-up using linear interpolation method. The Fine-Gray competing risk regression models were used to evaluate the association between TTR and cognitive outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 7965 patients with the mean (SD) age of 68.0 (9.2) years were included, and 35% were female. Patients with higher TTR were younger, more likely to be male and take <3 BP-lowering agents. Compared to the last quartile, the first quartile of TTR was significantly associated with a higher risk of probable dementia (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.22-2.46; p = 0.002) and the composite of probable dementia or mild cognitive impairment (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.03-1.55; p = 0.025). The risk of probable dementia and the composite outcome increased with per quartile decrease of TTR (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.06-1.30; p = 0.002 and HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.00-1.14; p = 0.036). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results after adjusting mean SBP during the first 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this secondary analysis of SPRINT data, TTR was independently associated with probable dementia among patients with hypertension, suggesting that TTR could be used as a practical metric of BP control to evaluate the risk of dementia in older adults.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Identifier: NCT01206062.

Diastolic and systolic blood pressure time in target range as a cardiovascular risk marker in patients with type 2 diabetes: A post hoc analysis of ACCORD BP trial

AIMS

We investigated the associations between time in target range (TTR) of blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

4651 participants from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) BP trial were included in the present study. The diastolic BP target range was defined as 70 to 80 mm Hg, and the systolic as 120 to 140 mm Hg and 110 to 130 mm Hg for the standard and intensive therapy, respectively.

RESULTS

After adjusting for covariates, 1-SD increase of diastolic TTR was significantly associated with lower risks of primary outcome (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.74-0.91, P < 0.001; HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.95, P = 0.0044, as well as nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.91, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, systolic TTR was significantly associated with various cardiovascular outcomes (P ≤ 0.016) in fully-adjusted models. The diastolic TTR sustained significance in myocardial infarction when systolic blood pressure average was higher than 120 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with diabetes, TTR of diastolic and systolic BP was independently associated with lower risks of major outcomes. The diastolic BP within the optimal target range was considerably important for reducing the risk of myocardial infarction, even when systolic BP was under stable control.

Hypertensive Heart Failure

Despite overwhelming epidemiological evidence, the contribution of hypertension (HTN) to heart failure (HF) development has been undermined in current clinical practice. This is because approximately half of HF patients have been labeled as suffering from HF with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF), with HTN, obesity, and diabetes mellitus (DM) being considered virtually equally responsible for its development. However, this suggestion is obviously inaccurate, since HTN is by far the most frequent and devastating morbidity present in HFpEF. Further, HF development in obesity or DM is rare in the absence of HTN or coronary artery disease (CAD), whereas HTN often causes HF per se. Finally, unlike HTN, for most major comorbidities present in HFpEF, including anemia, chronic kidney disease, pulmonary disease, DM, atrial fibrillation, sleep apnea, and depression, it is unknown whether they precede HF or result from it. The purpose of this paper is to provide a contemporary overview on hypertensive HF, with a special emphasis on its inflammatory nature and association with autonomic nervous system (ANS) imbalance, since both are of pathophysiologic and therapeutic interest.

Time in therapeutic range: timely in hypertension therapeutics?

Elevated blood pressure ranks among the most important modifiable risk factors for premature death, and disability from hypertension mediated organ damage in the world. Many studies attest to the value of lifestyle adjustments and pharmacologic therapy in improving outcomes in patients with hypertension. Since blood pressure is a dynamic vitals sign, variability in visit-to-visit measurements is expected. While guidelines recommend a goal blood pressure, increasing attention is centered on how often a patient's blood pressure is found to be not only below the recommended goal value, but also how much of the time the blood pressure is below what is considered a safe lower goal threshold for blood pressure. In this Perspective we review a relatively new technique in addressing adequacy of blood pressure treatment, the time in therapeutic range, and provide examples supporting the clinical relevance of this novel metric.