Exercise Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Percent Predicted Peak Exercise Oxygen Pulse Provides Insights Into Ventricular-Vascular Response and Prognosticates HFpEF

Background

Peak oxygen consumption and oxygen pulse along with their respective percent predicted measures are gold standards of exercise capacity. To date, no studies have investigated the relationship between percent predicted peak oxygen pulse (%PredO2P) and ventricular-vascular response (VVR) and the association of %PredO2P with all-cause mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients.

Objectives

The authors investigated the association between: 1) CPET measures of %PredO2P and VVR; and 2) %PredO2P and all-cause mortality in HFpEF patients.

Methods

Our cohort of 154 HFpEF patients underwent invasive CPET and were grouped into %PredO2P tertiles. The association between percent predicted Fick components and markers of VVR (ie, proportionate pulse pressure, effective arterial elastance) was determined with correlation analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors of mortality.

Results

The participants' mean age was 57 ± 15 years. Higher %PredO2P correlated with higher exercise capacity. In terms of VVR, higher %PredO2P correlated with a lower pressure for a given preload (effective arterial elastance r = -0.45, P < 0.001 and proportionate pulse pressure r = -0.22, P = 0.008). %PredO2P distinguished normal and abnormal percent predicted peak stroke volume and correlated positively with %PredVO2 (r = 0.61, P < 0.001). Participants had a median follow-up time of 5.6 years and 15% death. Adjusted for age and body mass index, there was a 5% relative reduction in mortality (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98, P = 0.003) for every percent increase in %PredO2P.

Conclusions

In HFpEF, %PredO2P is a VVR marker that can stratify invasive parameters such as percent predicted peak stroke volume. %PredO2P is an independent prognostic marker for all-cause mortality and those with higher %PredO2P exhibited longer survival.

Exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Causes, consequences and the journey towards a cure

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for over 50% of all heart failure cases nationwide and continues to rise in its prevalence. The complex, multi-organ involvement of the HFpEF clinical syndrome requires clinicians and investigators to adopt an integrative approach that considers the contribution of both cardiac and non-cardiac function to HFpEF pathophysiology. Thus, this symposium review outlines the key points from presentations covering the contributions of disease-related changes in cardiac function, arterial stiffness, peripheral vascular function, and oxygen delivery and utilization to exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF. While many aspects of HFpEF pathophysiology remain poorly understood, there is accumulating evidence for a decline in vascular health in this patient group that may be remediable through pharmacological and lifestyle interventions and could improve outcomes and clinical status in this ever-growing patient population.

Prognostic Significance of Blood Pressure at Rest and After Performing the Six-Minute Walk Test in Patients With Acute Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) pressure and BP response after six-minute walk test (6MWT) are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).

METHODS

We investigated these associations in 98 AHF patients (24.5% women; mean age, 70.5 years) enrolled in the ROSE trial (The Low-dose Dopamine or Low-dose Nesiritide in Acute Heart Failure with Renal Dysfunction). The primary endpoint consisted of any death or rehospitalization within 6 months after randomization. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) of the risks associated with 1-SD increase in post-exercise BP levels and BP ratios, calculated as BP immediately after 6MWT divided by BP before 6MWT.

RESULTS

The BP before and after 6MWT averaged 110.6/117.5 mm Hg for SBP and 61.9/64.7 mm Hg for DBP. In multivariable-adjusted analyses including clinic BP measured at the same day of 6MWT, higher DBP after 6MWT was associated with lower risk of the primary endpoint (HR, 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.95; P = 0.034). Both higher SBP and DBP immediately after 6MWT were associated with lower risk of 6-month mortality (HRs, 0.39/0.16; 95% CI, 0.17-0.90/0.065-0.40; P ≤ 0.026). The post-exercise SBP ratio was associated with the risk of 6-month mortality in multivariable-adjusted analyses (HR, 0.44; P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher BP levels and BP ratios immediately after 6MWT conferred lower risk of adverse health outcomes. Our observations highlight that 6MWT-related BP level and response may refine risk estimates in patients hospitalized AHF and may help further investigation for the development of HF preventive strategies.

Sympathetic and hemodynamic responses to exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Excessive sympathetic activity during exercise causes heightened peripheral vasoconstriction, which can reduce oxygen delivery to active muscles, resulting in exercise intolerance. Although both patients suffering from heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF, respectively) exhibit reduced exercise capacity, accumulating evidence suggests that the underlying pathophysiology may be different between these two conditions. Unlike HFrEF, which is characterized by cardiac dysfunction with lower peak oxygen uptake, exercise intolerance in HFpEF appears to be predominantly attributed to peripheral limitations involving inadequate vasoconstriction rather than cardiac limitations. However, the relationship between systemic hemodynamics and the sympathetic neural response during exercise in HFpEF is less clear. This mini review summarizes the current knowledge on the sympathetic (i.e., muscle sympathetic nerve activity, plasma norepinephrine concentration) and hemodynamic (i.e., blood pressure, limb blood flow) responses to dynamic and static exercise in HFpEF compared to HFrEF, as well as non-HF controls. We also discuss the potential of a relationship between sympathetic over-activation and vasoconstriction leading to exercise intolerance in HFpEF. The limited body of literature indicates that higher peripheral vascular resistance, perhaps secondary to excessive sympathetically mediated vasoconstrictor discharge compared to non-HF and HFrEF, drives exercise in HFpEF. Excessive vasoconstriction also may primarily account for over elevations in blood pressure and concomitant limitations in skeletal muscle blood flow during dynamic exercise, resulting in exercise intolerance. Conversely, during static exercise, HFpEF exhibit relatively normal sympathetic neural reactivity compared to non-HF, suggesting that other mechanisms beyond sympathetic vasoconstriction dictate exercise intolerance in HFpEF.

Exercise Testing in HFpEF: an Appraisal Through Diagnosis, Pathophysiology and Therapy A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) universally complain of exercise intolerance and dyspnoea as key clinical correlates. Cardiac as well as extracardiac components play a role for the limited exercise capacity, including an impaired cardiac and peripheral vascular reserve, a limitation in mechanical ventilation and/or gas exchange with reduced pulmonary vascular reserve, skeletal muscle dysfunction and iron deficiency/anaemia. Although most of these components can be differentiated and quantified through gas exchange analysis by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), the information provided by objective measures of exercise performance have not been systematically considered in the recent algorithms/scores for HFpEF diagnosis, neither by European nor US groups. The current Clinical Consensus Statement by the HFA and EAPC Association of the ESC aims at outlining the role of exercise testing and its pathophysiological, clinical and prognostic insights, addressing the implication of a thorough functional evaluation from the diagnostic algorithm to the pathophysiology and treatment perspectives of HFpEF. Along with these goals, we provide a specific analysis on the evidence that CPET is the standard for assessing, quantifying, and differentiating the origin of dyspnoea and exercise impairment and even more so when combined with echo and/or invasive hemodynamic evaluation is here provided. This will lead to improved quality of diagnosis when applying the proposed scores and may also help useful to implement the progressive characterization of the specific HFpEF phenotypes, a critical step toward the delivery of phenotype-specific treatments.