Stable isotope-dilution liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of thyroxine in saliva

Salivary Alterations in Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases: A Systematic Review

Autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) is a dysregulation of the immune system that causes an attack on the thyroid gland. Two major clinical manifestations are Hashimoto's thyroiditis and Graves' disease. Saliva performs many functions and, importantly, has the potential for easy, non-invasive diagnostics of several systemic disorders. This systematic review was designed to answer the question whether salivary alterations are reliable for the diagnosis of autoimmune thyroid diseases. Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, fifteen studies were included. Due to their heterogeneity, saliva analysis was divided into two subgroups: quantitative assessment analysing salivation and qualitative assessment concerning potential salivary biomarkers for AITD. In addition to detecting altered levels of thyroid hormones and antibodies, salivary changes were also observed in the concentrations of total protein, cytokines and chemokines, as well as markers of oxidative status. According to the saliva flow rate values, significantly reduced saliva secretion was observed in patients with HT. In conclusion, it is not possible to unequivocally state if salivary biomarkers can potentially be used in autoimmune thyroid disease diagnosis. Therefore, further investigations, including salivation disorders, are necessary to validate these findings.

Mass spectrometry in the diagnosis of thyroid disease and in the study of thyroid hormone metabolism

The importance of thyroid hormones in the regulation of development, growth, and energy metabolism is well known. Over the last decades, mass spectrometry has been extensively used to investigate thyroid hormone metabolism and to discover and characterize new molecules involved in thyroid hormones production, such as thyrotropin-releasing hormone. In the earlier period, the quantification methods, usually based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, were complicated and time consuming. They were mainly focused on basic research, and were not suitable for clinical diagnostics on a routine basis. The development of the modern mass spectrometers, mainly coupled to liquid chromatography, enabled simpler sample preparation procedures, and the accurate quantification of thyroid hormones, of their precursors, and of their metabolites in biological fluids, tissues, and cells became feasible. Nowadays, molecules of physiological and pathological interest can be assayed also for diagnostic purposes on a routine basis, and mass spectrometry is slowly entering the clinical laboratory. This review takes stock of the advancements in the field of thyroid metabolism that were carried out with mass spectrometry, with special focus on the use of this technique for the quantification of molecules involved in thyroid diseases.

Avoiding the pitfalls when quantifying thyroid hormones and their metabolites using mass spectrometric methods: The role of quality assurance

This short review aims to assess the application of basic quality assurance (QA) principles in published thyroid hormone bioanalytical methods using mass spectrometry (MS). The use of tandem MS, in particular linked to liquid chromatography has become an essential bioanalytical tool for the thyroid hormone research community. Although basic research laboratories do not usually work within the constraints of a quality management system and regulated environment, all of the reviewed publications, to a lesser or greater extent, document the application of QA principles to the MS methods described. After a brief description of the history of MS in thyroid hormone analysis, the article reviews the application of QA to published bioanalytical methods from the perspective of selectivity, accuracy, precision, recovery, instrument calibration, matrix effects, sensitivity and sample stability. During the last decade the emphasis has shifted from developing methods for the determination of L-thyroxine (T₄) and 3,3',5-triiodo-L-thyronine (T₃), present in blood serum/plasma in the 1-100 nM concentration range, to metabolites such as 3-iodo-L-thyronamine (3-T₁AM), 3,5-diiodo-L-thyronine (3,5-T₂) and 3,3'-diiodo-L-thyronine (3,3'-T₂). These metabolites seem likely to be present in the low pM concentrations; consequently, QA parameters such as selectivity and sensitivity become more critical. The authors conclude that improvements, particularly in the areas of analyte selectivity, matrix effect measurement/documentation and analyte recovery would be beneficial.

Saliva: a reliable sample matrix in bioanalytics

Saliva is gaining increasing attention as a bioanalytical sample matrix. Mostly because of the easy and noninvasive collection, it is not only beneficial in endocrinological and behavioral science, but also in pediatrics. Saliva also has the advantage of being the only body fluid which can be collected even during physical exercise, for example, during sportive activities, and there are physiological characteristics that make it superior to serum/plasma or urine for specific scientific questions. This review provides an insight into the physiology of saliva formation, explaining how certain compounds enter this bodily fluid, and gives advice for collection, storage and analytical methods. Finally, it presents a number of reliable and proven applications for saliva analysis from scientific fields including endocrinology, sports medicine, forensics and immunology.

Influence of saliva flow rate stimulated by gum-chewing on salivary concentrations of catecholamine metabolites

BACKGROUND

The measurement of homovanillic acid (HVA) and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) in saliva is useful for diagnosis of some psychiatric disorders. Gum-chewing increases salivation and is sometimes used to collect an adequate sample volume of saliva within a shorter time. However, the rate of saliva production may affect the salivary concentrations of these catecholamine metabolites. We clarified whether the salivary concentrations of HVA and MHPG are dependent on the rate of salivation.

METHODS

Stimulated saliva was collected from healthy volunteers chewing a tasteless and flavorless chewing gum after unstimulated saliva was collected without gum-chewing. The salivary HVA and MHPG concentrations were measured using newly developed LC/ESI-MS/MS methods.

RESULTS

The salivary HVA and MHPG concentrations were reproducibly measured when saliva was collected without gum-chewing (unstimulated saliva). In contrast, their salivary concentrations significantly decreased when salivation was stimulated by gum-chewing (p<0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Stimulated saliva by gum-chewing should be used with caution in the measurement of the catecholamine metabolites. LogD is a useful indicator, when predicting whether the salivary concentration of a compound is dependent on the rate of salivation.