Enantiomeric purity analysis of synthetic peptide therapeutics by direct chiral high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

Analytical considerations for characterization of generic peptide product: A regulatory insight

The Peptide therapeutics market was evaluated to be around USD 45.67 BN in 2023 and is projected to witness massive growth at a CAGR of around 5.63 % from 2024 to 2032 (USD 80.4 BN). Generic peptides are expected to reach USD 27.1 billion by 2032 after the patent monopoly of the pioneer peptides expires, and generic peptides become accessible. The generic manufacturers are venturing into peptide-based therapeutics for the aforementioned reasons. There is an abundance of material accessible regarding the characterization of peptides, which can be quite confusing for researchers. The FDA believes that an ANDA applicant may now demonstrate that the active component in a proposed generic synthetic peptide drug product is the "same" as the active ingredient in a peptide of rDNA origin that has previously been approved. To ensure the efficacy, safety, and quality of peptide therapies during development, regulatory bodies demand comprehensive characterization utilizing several orthogonal methodologies. This article elaborates the peptide characterization by segmenting into different segments as per the critical quality attribute from identification of the peptide to the physicochemical property of the peptide therapeutics which will be required to demonstrate the sameness with reference product based on the size of the peptide chain and molecular weight of the peptides. Article insights briefly on each individual technique and the orthogonal techniques for each test were explained. The impurities requirements in the generic peptides as per the regulatory requirement were also discussed.

Aspects of complexity in quality and safety assessment of peptide therapeutics and peptide-related impurities. A regulatory perspective

In recent years, a number of therapeutic peptides have been authorized in the EU market, and several others are in the clinical development phase or under assessment for full dossier or generic applications. Quality and safety guidelines specific to peptides are limited, and some aspects have to be considered. In particular, concerns relate to the analytical investigation for impurities and the toxicological assessment of these substances. The guidelines and the compendial pharmacopoeias provide certain references but that may be questionable if interpreted according to whether therapeutic peptides are considered chemical or biological entities, large or small. The characterization of peptide-related impurities cannot follow the small molecule approach but should consider aspects closely linked to the complex mechanisms of action that these large molecules can exert in the human body. Although direct genotoxic mechanisms cannot be excluded, hazardous interactions on biological systems cannot be ruled out, as in the case of natural peptide toxins and their specific interactions with cellular or membrane targets. From a regulatory perspective, only after specific risk identification and characterization should an equally specific safety threshold in relation to potential toxicity be defined.

Enantiomeric purity of synthetic therapeutic peptides: A review

Synthetic therapeutic peptides are a complex and popular class of pharmaceuticals. In recent years, peptides with proven therapeutic activity have gained significant interest in the market. The determination of synthetic peptide enantiomeric purity plays a critical role in the evaluation of the quality of the medicine. Since racemization is one of the most common side reactions occurring in AAs or peptides, enantiomeric impurities such as D-isomers can form during the peptide synthesis or can be introduced from the starting materials (e.g., AAs). The therapeutic effect of a synthetic or semi-synthetic bioactive peptide molecule depends on its AA enantiomeric purity and secondary/tertiary structure. Therefore, the enantiomeric purity determination for synthetic peptides is supportive for interpreting unwanted therapeutic effects and determining the quality of synthetic peptide therapeutics. However, enantiomeric purity analysis encounters formidable analytical challenges during chromatographic separation, as D/L isomers have identical physical-chemical properties except stereochemical configuration. To ensure peptides AA stereochemical configuration whether in the free or bound state, sensitive and reproducible quantitative analytical method is mandatory. In this regard, numerous analytical techniques were emerged for the quantification of D-isomeric impurities in synthetic peptides, but still, very few reports are available in the literature. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the importance, regulatory requirements, and various analytical methods used for peptide enantiomeric purity determination. In addition, we discussed the available literature in terms of enantiomeric impurity detection, common hydrolysis procedural aspects, and different analytical strategies used for sample preparation.