Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Angiographic Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

FFRct use for acute chest pain triage in the emergency department: a cost-effectiveness analysis

AIMS

To model and assess the cost-effectiveness of CT-based fractional flow reserve (FFRct) for a population of low to intermediate risk patients for coronary artery disease (CAD) presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using a decision tree model with a 1 year time horizon and from a health care perspective, two diagnostic pathways using FFRct are compared to current clinical routine combining coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with an exercise test. Model data are drawn from the literature and nationally reported data. Outcomes are assessed as the number of avoided invasive coronary angiographies (ICAs) showing no obstructive CAD and quality of life (QoL) in a theoretical cohort of 1000 patients. Sensitivity analyses are performed to test the robustness of the results. Determining FFRct when CCTA is inconclusive is a cost-effective and dominant strategy with a potential saving of 198€/patient, 154 avoided unnecessary ICA showing no obstructive CAD (uICA)/1000 patients and an average improvement in QoL of 0.008 QALY/patient. With an additional 574€/patient, 8 avoided uICA/1000 patients and an improvement in QoL of 0.001 QALY/patient, a strategy where FFRct is always performed is cost-effective only when considering high cost-effectiveness thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain and a low to intermediate pre-test probability of CAD, a diagnostic strategy where FFRct is determined after an inconclusive CCTA is cost-effective. Clinical trials investigating both sensitivity and specificity of FFRct, as well as QoL associated with the use of this technology in this setting are warranted.

Long-term prognostic value of quantitative-flow-ratio-concordant revascularization in stable coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

Confirming the prognostic value of global QFR and evaluating the long-term prognosis of QFR-concordant therapy in stable coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

Wire-based functional evaluation of coronary disease is linked to patient's prognosis. Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) is a newer index of computational physiology, linked to clinical outcomes and prognosis at 1 year follow-up. Long-term prognosis of QFR-concordant revascularization in stable coronary artery disease is however unknown hitherto.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with stable coronary disease undergoing coronary angiography were included. Centralized and blinded QFR analysis of three coronary territories was performed. Three vessel QFR (3vQFR) was defined as the sum of the basal QFR of each coronary territory. QFR-concordant revascularization was met if all significant lesions (QFR ≤ 0.80) were revascularized and all non-significant lesions (QFR > 0.80) were not; otherwise, the case was defined as QFR-discordant revascularization. Patient-oriented composite end-point (POCE) of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and unscheduled revascularization was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 803 patients from six high-volume centers were included. Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class II angina was the most frequent (48.9%) clinical presentation. Median of follow-up was 68.8 months. 3vQFR was an independent predictor of POCE (HR 1.79 CI95% 1.01-3.18), with 2.75 as optimal cut-off value, irrespective of the therapy received. QFR-discordant revascularization (QFR+/Revascularization- or QFR-/Revascularization+) was an independent predictor of POCE in multivariate analysis (HR 1.65, CI 95% 1.03-2.64).

CONCLUSION

Global burden of epicardial coronary atherosclerosis, as evaluated by 3vQFR, as well as QFR-discordant therapy are independent predictors of adverse clinical outcome at long-term follow-up in stable coronary artery disease.

[The Revival of the "Ischemic" Approach in the Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease: Analysis of Major World Research]

This analytical review focuses on large international studies on diagnostics of ischemic heart disease and addresses the role of radionuclide methods in evaluating myocardial perfusion and transient ischemia. Based on the reviewed data, the authors proposed a comprehensive instrumental approach to selecting a tactics for the management of patients with suspected or documented ischemic heart disease and for evaluating their prognosis.

Is it the Time to Move Towards Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? The Pros and Cons

Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Diagnosis is conventionally performed by direct visualization of the arteries by invasive coronary angiography (ICA), which has inherent limitations and risks. Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been suggested for a more accurate assessment of ischemia in the coronary artery with high accuracy for determining the severity and decision on the necessity of intervention. Nevertheless, invasive coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (ICA-FFR) is currently used in less than one-third of clinical practices because of the invasive nature of ICA and the need for additional equipment and experience, as well as the cost and extra time needed for the procedure. Recent technical advances have moved towards non-invasive high-quality imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance, single-photon emission computed tomography, and coronary computed tomography (CT) scan; however, none had a definitive modality to confirm hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can provide accurate anatomic and hemodynamic data about the coronary lesion, especially calculating fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (CCTA-FFR). Although growing evidence has been published regarding CCTA-FFR results being comparable to ICA-FFR, CCTA-FFR has not yet replaced the invasive conventional angiography, pending additional studies to validate the advantages and disadvantages of each diagnostic method. Furthermore, it has to be identified whether revascularization of a stenotic lesion is plausible based on CCTA-FFR and if the therapeutic plan can be determined safely and accurately without confirmation from invasive methods. Therefore, in the present review, we will outline the pros and cons of using CCTA-FFR vs. ICA-FFR regarding diagnostic accuracy and treatment decision-making.

CT Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Artery Disease: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence and Recent Developments

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is routinely used for anatomical assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, invasive measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant CAD. CT-derived FFRCT and CT perfusion are two emerging techniques that can provide a functional assessment of CAD for risk stratification and clinical decision making. Several clinical studies have shown that the diagnostic performance of concomitant CCTA and functional CT assessment for detecting hemodynamically significant CAD is at least non-inferior to that of other routinely used imaging modalities. This article aims to review the current clinical evidence and recent developments in functional CT techniques.

A fast algebraic approach for noninvasive prediction of fractional flow reserve in coronary arteries

The fractional flow reserve (FFR) index is an important clinical indicator for characterizing coronary artery disease (CAD) functional significance, allowing cardiologists to decide whether intervention is required or not. Noninvasive techniques for calculating FFR are still incompletely resolved and rely heavily on time consuming numerical methods, which may hinder their clinical translation. This paper reports on the development of two fast and noninvasive methods for predicting FFR in diseased coronary arteries. The new methods are derived from physical principles and account for patient-specific physiological parameters that can be noninvasively measured. The developed algebraic equations calculate FFR without performing any tedious numerical simulations, making them attractive for clinical applications. The performance of the methods is assessed by comparing their predictions with measurements and with results obtained by full three-dimensional numerical simulations on healthy and diseased idealized coronary arteries and actual anatomical branches. Results generated by the new methodology are within 5% of measurements and in very good agreement with values obtained numerically.

Influence of fractional flow reserve on grafts patency: Systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of invasive functional guidance for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) on graft failure.

BACKGROUND

Data on the impact of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in guiding CABG are still limited.

METHODS

Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis were performed. Primary objective was the risk of graft failure, stratified by FFR. Risk estimates are reported as odds ratios (ORs) derived from the aggregated data using random-effects models. Individual patient data were analyzed using mixed effect model to assess relationship between FFR and graft failure. This meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020180444).

RESULTS

Four prospective studies comprising 503 patients referred for CABG, with 1471 coronaries, assessed by FFR were included. Graft status was available for 1039 conduits at median of 12.0 [IQR 6.6; 12.0] months. Risk of graft failure was higher in vessels with preserved FFR (OR 5.74, 95% CI 1.71-19.29). Every 0.10 FFR units decrease in the coronaries was associated with 56% risk reduction of graft failure (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59). FFR cut-off to predict graft failure was 0.79.

CONCLUSION

Surgical grafting of coronaries with functionally nonsignificant stenoses was associated with higher risk of graft failure.

Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Transesophageal Atrial Pacing Stress Test in Patients With Borderline Stenoses in the Coronary Arteries: a Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve

Aim      To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac perfusion computed tomography (PCT) with transesophageal electrocardiostimulation (TE ECS) for detection of ischemia in patients with borderline coronary stenosis (50-75 %) compared to measurements of fractional flow reserve (FFR).Material and methods  The study included 25 patients with borderline (50-75 %) coronary stenosis as per data of computed tomography angiography (CTA) or coronary angiography (CAG). Later the patients underwent invasive measurement of FFR and cardiac PCT on a 320-row detector tomograph in combination with the TE ECS stress test.  FFR values <0.8 indicated the hemodynamic significance of stenosis. Myocardial perfusion was evaluated visually based on consensus of two experts.Results All patients completed the study protocol. Cardiac pacing duration was 6 min for all patients. Four patients required intravenous administration of atropine sulphate. PCT with TE ECS detected significant for FFR stenoses with sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a positive result and predictive value for a negative result of 47, 90, 87, and 53 %, respectively.Conclusion      PCT with TE ECS in combination with CTA can be considered as an informative method for simultaneous evaluation of the condition of coronary arteries and detection of myocardial ischemia. This method is particularly relevant for assessing the hemodynamic significance of borderline coronary stenoses.

Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve: Correlation and accuracy

PURPOSE

To define the diagnostic power of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) evaluation on dynamic CZT imaging in intermediate risk patients in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR).

METHODS

Twenty-three stable CAD patients underwent one-day dynamic rest-stress 99mTc-Sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT camera. Stress and rest MBF values were calculated semi-automatically using a net retention model by Leppo. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and flow difference (FD) [MBF stress - MBF rest] were also estimated. A total of 28 vessels were functionally quantified with FFR: 19 (68%) vessels with a stenosis ≥ 70% and 9 (32%) with < 70% stenotic lesions.

RESULTS

The mean global MBFs at rest and during stress were 0.36 (IQR 0.33-0.54) mL/min/g and 0.67 (IQR 0.55-0.81) mL/min/g, respectively, with an average CFR of 1.80 (IQR 1.35-2.24). Moderate correlations between stenosis severity and FFR (r = 0.45; P = .01), stress MBF (r = -0.46; P = .01) and FD (r = -0.37; P = .04) were detected. FFR abnormalities were best predicted by absolute stress MBF, CFR and FD with values of ≤ 0.54 mL/min/g (sensitivity 61.5%; specificity 93.3%), ≤ 1.48 (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 93.3%) and ≤ 0.18 mL/min/g (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 100%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The values of stress MBF, CFR and FD obtained through dynamic CZT acquisitions compare well with invasive FFR. The clinical use of dynamic acquisition of myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT may help cardiologist in the detection of hemodynamically significant CAD.

ADDED Index or percentage diameter of residual coronary stenosis to risk-stratify patients presenting with STEMI

BACKGROUND

We compared the prognostic value of the ADDED Index with visually estimated diameter (DS) of residual coronary stenosis (RS) in STEMI patients after successful PCI of the culprit lesion. Even though associated with a positive outcome, the functional assessment of non-culprit stenosis remains largely underused, especially in STEMI patients. The Angiography-DeriveD hEmoDynamic index (ADDED index) showed high accuracy to predict FFR and it might be used to better guide the diagnostic and therapeutic work-up of such patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 596 patients grouped on the basis of either the ADDED Index (ADDED Negative (<2.23, n = 153) vs ADDED Positive (≥2.23, n = 129)) or the DS of the RS (RS Negative (<50%, n = 177) vs RS Positive (≥50%, n = 105)). Patients without any RS served as control (n = 314). Primary endpoints were: 1) major adverse cardiac events (MACE), composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), clinically driven revascularizations (CDR); 2) non-culprit vessel oriented clinical events (VOCE), composite of all-cause death, non-culprit vessel related MI and CDR.

RESULTS

At 24 months the rate of both MACE and VOCE was significantly higher in both the ADDED Positive and RS Positive groups. However, differently from patients in whom complete revascularization was deferred on the basis of the angiography (RS Negative), no additional risk was found for patients in the ADDED Negative group.

CONCLUSIONS

In STEMI patients with MVD deferring treatment of RS on the basis of the ADDED index, rather than the visually estimated DS, is associated with a favorable clinical outcome.

Noninvasive Assessment of the Fractional Flow Reserve with the CT FFRc 1D Method: Final Results of a Pilot Study

Background:

Until recently, Russia did not utilize noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment. We developed an automated algorithm for noninvasive assessment of FFR based on a one-dimensional (1D) mathematical modeling.

Objective:

The research aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of this algorithm.

Methods:

The study enrolled 80 patients: 16 of them underwent 64-slice computed tomography – included retrospectively, 64 – prospectively, with a 640-slice CT scan. Specialists processed CT images and evaluated noninvasive FFR. Ischemia was confirmed if FFR < 0.80 and disproved if FFR ≥ 0.80. The prospective group of patients was hospitalized for invasive FFR assessment as a reference standard. If ischemic, patients underwent stent implantation. In the retrospective group, patients already had invasive FFR values.

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8. We compared two methods using a Bland–Altman plot and per-vessel ROC curve analysis. Considering the abnormality of distribution by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, we have used Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.

Results:

During data processing, three patients of the retrospective and 46 patients of the prospective group were excluded. The sensitivity of our method was 66.67% (95% CI: 46.71–82.03); the specificity was 78.95% (95% CI: 56.67–91.49), p = 0.0052, in the per-vessel analysis. In per-patient analysis, the sensitivity was 69.57% (95% CI: 49.13–84.40); the specificity was 87.50% (95% CI: 52.91–99.36), p = 0.0109. The area under the ROC curve in the per-vessel analysis was 77.52% (95% CI: 66.97–88.08), p < 0.0001.

Conclusion:

The obtained indices of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV are, in general, comparable to those in other studies. Moreover, the noninvasive values of FFR yielded a high correlation coefficient with the invasive values. However, the AUC was not high enough, 77.52 (95% CI: 66.97–88.08), p < 0.0001. The discrepancy is probably attributed to the initial data heterogeneity and low statistical power.

Associations between dyspnoea, coronary atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular outcomes: results from the long-term follow-up CONFIRM registry

AIMS 

The relationship between dyspnoea, coronary artery disease (CAD), and major cardiovascular events (MACE) is poorly understood. This study evaluated (i) the association of dyspnoea with the severity of anatomical CAD by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and (ii) to which extent CAD explains MACE in patients with dyspnoea.

METHODS AND RESULTS 

From the international COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN for Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter (CONFIRM) registry, 4425 patients (750 with dyspnoea) with suspected but without known CAD were included and prospectively followed for ≥5 years. First, the association of dyspnoea with CAD severity was assessed using logistic regression analysis. Second, the prognostic value of dyspnoea for MACE (myocardial infarction and death), and specifically, the interaction between dyspnoea and CAD severity was investigated using Cox proportional-hazard analysis. Mean patient age was 60.3 ± 11.9 years, 63% of patients were male and 592 MACE events occurred during a median follow-up duration of 5.4 (IQR 5.1-6.0) years. On uni- and multivariable analysis (adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, chest pain typicality, and risk factors), dyspnoea was associated with two- and three-vessel/left main (LM) obstructive CAD. The presence of dyspnoea increased the risk for MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-1.90], which was modified after adjusting for clinical predictors and CAD severity (HR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.55). Conversely, when stratified by CAD severity, dyspnoea did not provide incremental prognostic value in one-, two-, or three-vessel/LM obstructive CAD, but dyspnoea did provide incremental prognostic value in non-obstructive CAD.

CONCLUSION 

In patients with suspected CAD, dyspnoea was independently associated with severe obstructive CAD on CCTA. The severity of obstructive CAD explained the elevated MACE rates in patients presenting with dyspnoea, but in patients with non-obstructive CAD, dyspnoea portended additional risk.

Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging vs Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Invasive Vessel-Specific Coronary Physiology: Predictive Modeling Results From the Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Determinants of Myocardial Ischemia (CREDENCE) Trial

Importance

Stress imaging has been the standard for diagnosing functionally significant coronary artery disease. It is unknown whether novel, atherosclerotic plaque measures improve accuracy beyond coronary stenosis for diagnosing invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement.

Objective

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of comprehensive anatomic (obstructive and nonobstructive atherosclerotic plaque) vs functional imaging measures for estimating vessel-specific FFR.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Controlled clinical trial of diagnostic accuracy with a multicenter derivation-validation cohort of patients referred for nonemergent invasive coronary angiography. A total of 612 patients (64 [10] years; 30% women) with signs and symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia from 23 sites were included. Patients were recruited from 2014 to 2017. Data analysis began in August 2018.

Interventions

Patients underwent invasive coronary angiography with measurement of invasive FFR, coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) quantification of atherosclerotic plaque and FFR by CT (FFR-CT), and semiquantitative scoring of rest/stress myocardial perfusion imaging (by magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography, or single photon emission CT). Multivariable generalized linear mixed models were derived and validated calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was invasive FFR of 0.80 or less.

Results

Of the 612 patients, the mean (SD) age was 64 (10) years, and 426 (69.9%) were men. An invasive FFR of 0.80 or less was measured in 26.5% of 1727 vessels. In the derivation cohort, CCTA vessel-specific factors associated with FFR 0.80 or less were stenosis severity, percentage of noncalcified atheroma volume, lumen volume, the number of lesions with high-risk plaque (≥2 of low attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, napkin ring sign, or spotty calcification), and the number of lesions with stenosis greater than 30%. Fractional flow reserve-CT was not additive to this model including stenosis and atherosclerotic plaque. Significant myocardial perfusion imaging predictors were the summed rest and difference scores. In the validation cohort, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.81 for CCTA vs 0.67 for myocardial perfusion imaging (P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

A comprehensive anatomic interpretation with CCTA, including quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive atherosclerotic plaque, was superior to functional imaging in the diagnosis of invasive FFR. Comprehensive CCTA measures improve prediction of vessel-specific coronary physiology more so than stress-induced alterations in myocardial perfusion.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02173275.

Physiology and coronary artery disease: emerging insights from computed tomography imaging based computational modeling

Improvements in spatial and temporal resolution now permit robust high quality characterization of presence, morphology and composition of coronary atherosclerosis in computed tomography (CT). These characteristics include high risk features such as large plaque volume, low CT attenuation, napkin-ring sign, spotty calcification and positive remodeling. Because of the high image quality, principles of patient-specific computational fluid dynamics modeling of blood flow through the coronary arteries can now be applied to CT and allow the calculation of local lesion-specific hemodynamics such as endothelial shear stress, fractional flow reserve and axial plaque stress. This review examines recent advances in coronary CT image-based computational modeling and discusses the opportunity to identify lesions at risk for rupture much earlier than today through the combination of anatomic and hemodynamic information.

[Myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computer tomography and coronary angiography results in patients with different pretest probability of ischemic heart disease]

AIM

To study the relationship between pretest probability (PTP) of ischemic heart disease (IHD), calculated according to the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) of 2013 and 2019, with the perfusion of the left ventricle of the myocardium according to the single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) and the results of the invasive coronary angiography (CAG).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 220 patients with a preliminary diagnosis of ischemic heart disease and planned invasive CAG. All patients underwent rest-stress perfusion myocardial SPECT within 1 month prior to or after CAG, standard quantitative parameters of left ventricular perfusion were assessed. Retrospectively clinical data was analyzed and PTP of IHD was assessed according to ESC recommendations for 2013 and 2019.

RESULTS

Invasive CAG revealed obstructive lesion of one or more coromary arteries in 204 of the 220 patients (92.7%). In a retrospective analysis, taking into account gender, age and nature of the complaints, as recommended by ESC in 2013, PTP was rated as low (15%) in 13 patients (5.9%), as intermediate (1585%) in 207 patients (94.1%). Following the comprehensive survey (SPECT and CAG) 8 patients with low PTP (61.5%) underwent coronary revascularization. Among patients with intermediate PTP significant transient ischemia according to SPECT was detected in 31 (15.0%), initial at 107 (51.7%). According CAG among patients with intermediate PTP obstructive lesion was found in 192 (92.7%), 113 patients (58.8%) underwent revascularization. According to ESC recommendations of 2019, PTP was rated as low (15%) in 117 patients (53.2%), including 514% in 98 (44.5%). According to a survey (SPECT and CAG) 68 of them (58.1%) underwent revascularization.

CONCLUSION

PTP measurements proposed by ESC can not be applied to patients of the Russian population with suspected ischemic heart disease without significant corrections. 2013 ESC recommendations with higher PTP values for all categories of patients reflect Russian population better, while 2019 recommendations mistakenly attribute patients to low PTP in at least 58% of cases. These results are preliminary and will be expanded in subsequent studies with more detailed analysis of PTP in included patients with suspected IHD.

Stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance and serial fractional flow reserve assessment of the left anterior descending artery in patients undergoing right coronary artery chronic total occlusion revascularization

Background

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment of remote arteries, in the context of a bystander chronic total occlusion (CTO), can lead to false positive results. Adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) evaluates perfusion defects across the entire myocardium and may therefore be a reliable tool in the work-up of remote lesions in CTO patients. The IMPACT-CTO study investigated donor artery invasive physiology before, immediately post, and at 4 months following right coronary artery (RCA) CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this subanalysis was to assess the concordance between baseline perfusion CMR and serial FFR evaluation of left anterior descending artery (LAD) ischemia in patients from the IMPACT-CTO study.

Methods

Baseline adenosine stress CMR examinations from 26 patients were analyzed for qualitative evidence of LAD ischemia. The results were correlated with the serial LAD FFR measurements.

Results

The present findings demonstrated that before RCA CTO PCI, there was 62% agreement between perfusion CMR and FFR (ischemic threshold ≤ 0.8) in the assessment of LAD ischemia (k = 0.29; fair concordance). At 4 months after revascularization, there was 77% agreement (k = 0.52; moderate concordance) between the index CMR assessment of LAD ischemia and the follow-up LAD FFR. Concordance was improved at a LAD FFR ischemic threshold of ≤ 0.75.

Conclusions

In this hypothesis generating study, baseline CMR assessment of LAD ischemia correlated better with the 4 months LAD FFR data (threshold ≤ 0.8) as compared to the FFR measurements taken prior to RCA CTO revascularization.

Myocardial perfusion imaging by single-photon emission tomography (MPI SPECT) versus Instantaneous wave-free ratio (IFR) for assessment of functional significance of intermediate coronary artery lesions

Background

The aim of our work was to compare the myocardial perfusion imaging by single-photon emission tomography (MPI-SPECT) as a non-invasive, relatively non-expensive test versus the instantaneous wave-free ratio (IFR) for the evaluation of functional significance of the borderline coronary artery lesions in the view of results of fractional flow reserve (FFR) which is considered the gold standard reference test.

Results

Our study was conducted in the Cardiology Department. It included 50 patients with borderline coronary artery lesions; they underwent physiological evaluation by stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging using followed by an invasive physiological assessment by Instantaneous wave-free ratio (IFR) and Fractional flow reserve (FFR). Finally, the results of both SPECT MPI and IFR were compared to FFR as a gold standard reference. There was a strong (kappa = 0.754) significant (P value < 0.001) agreement between the MPI results and FFR results and the overall agreement was 88%. The sensitivity of the MPI was 81.8%, the specificity was 92.9%, the positive predictive value was 90%, the negative predictive value was 86.7%, the positive likelihood ratio was 11.45, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.20. There was a strong (kappa = 0.918) significant (P value < 0.001) agreement between the IFR results and FFR results and the overall agreement was 96%. The sensitivity of the IFR was 90.9%, the specificity was 100%, the positive predictive value was 100 %, the negative predictive value was 93.3%, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.09.

Conclusions

The instantaneous wave-free ratio (IFR) may be a valid alternative to fractional flow reserve to assess the functional significance of intermediate coronary lesions. The myocardial perfusion imaging may be an alternative, non-invasive, relatively non-expensive test for the evaluation of the physiological significance of intermediate coronary lesions.

Effect of Wall Elasticity on Hemodynamics and Wall Shear Stress in Patient-Specific Simulations in the Coronary Arteries

Wall shear stress (WSS) has been shown to be associated with myocardial infarction (MI) and progression of atherosclerosis. Wall elasticity is an important feature of hemodynamic modeling affecting WSS calculations. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of wall elasticity on WSS, and justify use of either rigid or elastic models in future studies. Digital anatomic models of the aorta and coronaries were created based on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in four patients. Hemodynamics was computed in rigid and elastic models using a finite element flow solver. WSS in five timepoints in the cardiac cycle and time averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) were compared between the models at each 3 mm subsegment and 4 arcs in cross sections along the centerlines of coronaries. In the left main (LM), proximal left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX), and proximal right coronary artery (RCA) of the elastic model, the mean percent radial increase 5.95 ± 1.25, 4.02 ± 0.97, 4.08 ± 0.94, and 4.84 ± 1.05%, respectively. WSS at each timepoint in the cardiac cycle had slightly different values; however, when averaged over the cardiac cycle, there were negligible differences between the models. In both the subsegments (n = 704) and subarc analysis, TAWSS in the two models were highly correlated (r = 0.99). In investigation on the effect of coronary wall elasticity on WSS in CCTA-based models, the results of this study show no significant differences in TAWSS justifying using rigid wall models for future larger studies.

Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary Artery Disease 2 (Dan-NICAD 2): Study design for a controlled study of diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the preferred primary diagnostic modality when examining patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease (CAD). Only 20-30% of these have potentially obstructive CAD. Because of the relatively poor positive predictive value of coronary CTA, unnecessary invasive coronary angiographies (ICAs) are conducted with the costs and risks associated with the procedure. Hence, an optimized diagnostic CAD algorithm may reduce the numbers of ICAs not followed by revascularization. The Dan-NICAD 2 study has 3 equivalent main aims: (1) To examine the diagnostic precision of a sound-based diagnostic algorithm, The CADScor®System (Acarix A/S, Denmark), in patients with a low to intermediate pre-test risk of CAD referred to a primary examination by coronary CTA. We hypothesize that the CADScor®System provides better stratification prior to coronary CTA than clinical risk stratification scores alone. (2) To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3T cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (3T CMRI), ⁸²rubidium positron emission tomography (⁸²Rb-PET), and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) in patients where obstructive CAD cannot be ruled out by coronary CTA using ICA fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference standard. (3) To compare the diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and ICA-FFR in patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability of CAD using ⁸²Rb-PET as reference standard.

METHODS

Dan-NICAD 2 is a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study including approximately 2,000 patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability of CAD and without previous history of CAD. Patients are referred to coronary CTA because of symptoms suggestive of CAD, as evaluated by a cardiologist. Patient interviews, sound recordings, and blood samples are obtained in connection with the coronary CTA. If coronary CTA does not rule out obstructive CAD, patients will be examined by 3T CMRI ⁸²Rb-PET, FFR_CT, ICA, and FFR. Reference standard is ICA-FFR. Obstructive CAD is defined as an FFR ≤0.80 or as high-grade stenosis (>90% diameter stenosis) by visual assessment. Diagnostic performance will be evaluated as sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, calibration, and discrimination. Enrolment started January 2018 and is expected to be completed by June 2020. Patients are followed for 10 years after inclusion.

DISCUSSION

The results of the Dan-NICAD 2 study are expected to contribute to the improvement of diagnostic strategies for patients suspected of CAD in 3 different steps: risk stratification prior to coronary CTA, diagnostic strategy after coronary CTA, and invasive wireless QFR analysis as an alternative to ICA-FFR.

Improved diagnosis of the number of stenosed coronary artery vessels by segmentation with scatter and photo-peak window data for attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPECT

BACKGROUND

Attenuation correction using segmentation of scatter and photo-peak window data (SSPAC) enables an evaluation of the attenuation map in a patient-specific manner without additional radiation exposure. We compared the accuracy of SSPAC and non-corrected myocardial perfusion scintigraphy methods for diagnosing the number of stenosed coronary artery vessels.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed the data from 183 consecutive patients who underwent 99mTc-tetrofosmin stress/rest SPECT examination and a coronary angiography within 3 months. The MPS images were reconstructed with and without SSPAC attenuation correction. We examined the accuracy of the quantitative interpretation using summed differential score in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). The attenuation maps were successfully determined in 179 of 183 patients (98%). In terms of the vessel-based diagnostic ability, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of the SSPAC and non-correction methods for diagnosing CAD in individual coronary territories were 77%*, 89%, 74%*, and 90%* vs 51%, 87%, 62%, and 82%, respectively (*P < .05). In 35 patients with multi-vessel CAD, those values were 78%*, 81%, 93%, and 55%* vs 49%, 81%, 89%, and 34%, respectively (*P < .05; AUC: 0.82 vs 0.62, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

SSPAC-corrected SPECT myocardial perfusion images exhibit improved accuracy in the detection of the number of stenosed coronary artery vessels, even in patients with multi-vessel CAD.

Poor performance of historical prediction models in patients investigated for chest pain: a prospective single centre, head-to-head comparison in a large cohort of patients

BACKGROUND

An optimal investigation strategy for patients with suspected angina pectoris (AP) remains elusive. Present guidelines use the Duke Clinical Score (DCS) or the Diamond-Forrester (DF) model to compute the likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD). This prospective study of patients referred to a chest pain clinic compares the relative values of these two historical models and of pain characteristics only to predict the presence of CAD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall, 1376 patients reviewed in a chest pain clinic were assigned to five CAD likelihood groups (<10, 10-29, 30-60, 61-90 and >90%) using DCS and to three CAD likelihood groups (<15, 15-85 and >85%) using the DF model. Patients were diagnosed with CAD when they had either obstructive (>70%) coronary stenoses or a positive functional test.

RESULTS

In all, 652 (47%) patients had nonanginal CP, 412 (30%) patients had atypical AP and 312 (23%) had typical AP. Four hundred seventeen (30%) patients were not investigated for CAD because of nonanginal symptoms and/or low CAD probability. The actual CAD prevalence was 21% versus a DCS predicted one of 51% and a DF model predicted one of 38% (P<0.001). Both models had modest predictive abilities with areas under the curve of of 0.695 and 0.693 and did not show useful clinical superiority over a prediction model using pain characteristics only (area under the curve: 0.65).

CONCLUSION

CAD prevalence in patients referred for suspected AP is significantly lower than expected by using historical prediction models. The use of risk factors profile and demographics in addition to symptoms characteristics does not improve diagnostic accuracy.

Clinical Predictors of Recurrent Ventricular Arrhythmias in Secondary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients With Coronary Artery Disease - Lower Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Incomplete Revascularization

BACKGROUND

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a standard prevention therapy for patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia (VA), that is, ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. However, clinical predictors of recurrent VA in secondary prevention ICD recipients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remain unknown. Methods and Results: We followed up 96 consecutive patients with CAD undergoing ICD implantation for secondary prevention of SCD. Long-term rates and clinical predictors of appropriate ICD therapy (ICD-Tx) for VA were analyzed. Appropriate ICD-Tx occurred in 41 (42.7%) patients during a median follow-up of 2.4 years (interquartile range, 0.9-6.1). These patients had significantly greater left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (62.3±1.3 vs. 54.6±1.1 mm, P<0.001), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 36.3±2.0% vs. 45.7±1.8%, P<0.001), and more incomplete revascularization (ICR; 70.7% vs. 45.5%, P=0.014) than those without appropriate ICD-Tx. Multivariable analysis showed that LVEF (hazards ratio [HR], 0.950; 95% CI: 0.925-0.975; P<0.001) and ICR (HR, 2.293; 95% CI: 1.133-4.637; P=0.021) were significant predictors of appropriate ICD-Tx for VA.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower LVEF and ICR were independent predictors of recurrent VA in secondary prevention ICD recipients with CAD.

A multi-scale model of the coronary circulation applied to investigate transmural myocardial flow

Distribution of blood flow in myocardium is a key determinant of the localization and severity of myocardial ischemia under impaired coronary perfusion conditions. Previous studies have extensively demonstrated the transmural difference of ischemic vulnerability. However, it remains incompletely understood how transmural myocardial flow is regulated under in vivo conditions. In the present study, a computational model of the coronary circulation was developed to quantitatively evaluate the sensitivity of transmural flow distribution to various cardiovascular and hemodynamic factors. The model was further incorporated with the flow autoregulatory mechanism to simulate the regulation of myocardial flow in the presence of coronary artery stenosis. Numerical tests demonstrated that heart rate (HR), intramyocardial tissue pressure (P_im ), and coronary perfusion pressure (P_per ) were the major determinant factors for transmural flow distribution (evaluated by the subendocardial-to-subepicardial (endo/epi) flow ratio) and that the flow autoregulatory mechanism played an important compensatory role in preserving subendocardial perfusion against reduced P_per . Further analysis for HR variation-induced hemodynamic changes revealed that the rise in endo/epi flow ratio accompanying HR decrease was attributable not only to the prolongation of cardiac diastole relative to systole, but more predominantly to the fall in P_im . Moreover, it was found that P_im and P_per interfered with each other with respect to their influence on transmural flow distribution. These results demonstrate the interactive effects of various cardiovascular and hemodynamic factors on transmural myocardial flow, highlighting the importance of taking into account patient-specific conditions in the explanation of clinical observations.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease: a focus on physiology

Multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVD) frequently features ambiguous or intermediate lesions that may be both serial and complex, suggesting that multiple regions require revascularization. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with various challenges such as appropriate identification of lesions that should be treated, the choice of an optimum revascularization method, and limitations of long-term outcomes. Optimal patient selection and careful targeting of lesions are key when planning treatment. Physiology-guided decision-making (based on the fractional flow reserve) can overcome the current limitations of PCI used to treat MVD regardless of clinical presentation or disease subtype, as confirmed in recent clinical trials. Here, we review the use of physiology-guided PCI for patients with MVD, and their early and late outcomes.

Intravascular ultrasound characteristics in patients with intermediate coronary lesions and borderline fractional flow reserve measurements

Revascularization of borderline fractional flow reserve (FFR) is controversial and the morphologic characteristics of borderline FFR lesions are not well known. The objective of this study was to determine the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) characteristics in intermediate coronary lesions with borderline FFR in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis (40%-70% diameter stenosis).Both IVUS and FFR were performed in a total of 228 left anterior descending arteries. We divided them into 3 groups by FFR value: ischemic (n = 46, FFR < 0.75), borderline (n = 71, FFR 0.75 to ≤0.80), and non-ischemic (n = 111, FFR > 0.80). We compared the IVUS parameters, including minimum lumen area, lesion length, plaque burden, and volumetric analysis among the 3 groups.In the IVUS analysis, the minimum lumen area was smaller (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 3.4 ± 1.2 mm, P < .001); lesion length was longer (23.6 ± 8.4 vs. 23.6 ± 7.4 vs. 17.4 ± 6.8 mm, P < .001); plaque burden was larger (76.1 ± 9.6 vs. 73.9 ± 7.5 vs. 69.8 ± 9.5%, P < .001); plaque volume was larger (173.0 ± 78.3 vs. 167.7 ± 75.0 vs. 129.5 ± 79.1 mm, P < .01); and percent atheroma volume was larger (57.9 ± 7.5 vs. 57.6 ± 6.6 vs. 53.9 ± 8.0%, P < .01) in the ischemic and borderline groups compared with the non-ischemic group, respectively. However, post-hoc analyses showed there were no significant differences between the ischemic and borderline group for all IVUS parameters.There were no differences in IVUS characteristics between borderline and functionally significant FFR, but the amount of atheromatous plaque was more severe in these 2 groups than in the non-ischemic group.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a guide to treat coronary artery disease

INTRODUCTION

The presence and extent of myocardial ischemia are the major determinants of prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Unlike coronary angiography alone, fractional flow reserve (FFR) has enabled interventional cardiologists to accurately determine whether coronary atherosclerotic plaques are responsible for myocardial ischemia, and therefore deserve to be revascularized. Areas covered: An overview on the role of FFR in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease, as well as the potential related controversies is provided. Authors describe the coronary physiology underneath this technique and all the procedural aspects in the catheterization laboratory. The landmark trials and the current applications in different coronary lesions and syndromes are also described and potential future research involving FFR and comparisons with other methodologies for the evaluation of coronary physiology are introduced. Expert commentary: FFR is still unsurpassed in diagnostic performance when compared to non-hyperemic indices and noninvasive techniques, and remains the gold standard for the detection of ischemia-inducing coronary stenoses. FFR-guided PCI has been demonstrated superior to an angiography-guided PCI and over medical therapy alone, and ongoing investigation will clarify whether it could perform better, or at least equalize the results of cardiac surgery in patients with severe multivessel disease.

Prospective Comparison of FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With SPECT Perfusion Imaging in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The ReASSESS Study

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the per-patient diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) with that of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), using a fractional flow reserve (FFR) value of ≤0.80 as the reference for diagnosing at least 1 hemodynamically significant stenosis in a head-to-head comparison of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis as determined by coronary CTA.

BACKGROUND

No previous study has prospectively compared the diagnostic performance of FFR_CT and myocardial perfusion imaging by SPECT in symptomatic patients with intermediate range coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

This study was conducted at a single-center as a prospective study in patients with stable angina pectoris (N = 143). FFR_CT and SPECT analyses were performed by core laboratories and were blinded for the personnel responsible for downstream patient management. FFR_CT ≤0.80 distally in at least 1 coronary artery with a diameter ≥2 mm classified patients as having ischemia. Ischemia by SPECT was encountered if a reversible perfusion defect (summed difference score ≥2) or transitory ischemic dilation of the left ventricle (ratio >1.19) were found.

RESULTS

The per-patient diagnostic performance for identifying ischemia (95% confidence interval [CI]), FFR_CT versus SPECT, were sensitivity of 91% (95% CI: 81% to 97%) versus 41% (95% CI: 29% to 55%; p < 0.001); specificity of 55% (95% CI: 44% to 66%) versus 86% (95% CI: 77% to 93%; p < 0.001); negative predictive value of 90% (95% CI: 82% to 98%) versus 68% (95% CI: 59% to 77%; p = 0.001); positive predictive value of 58% (95% CI: 48% to 68%) versus 67% (95% CI: 51% to 82%; p = NS); and accuracy of 70% (95% CI: 62% to 77%) versus 68% (95% CI: 60% to 75%; p = NS) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable chest pain and CAD as determined by coronary CTA, the overall diagnostic accuracy levels of FFR_CT and SPECT were identical in assessing hemodynamically significant stenosis. However, FFR_CT demonstrated a significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity than SPECT.

Fractional flow reserve to guide and to assess coronary artery bypass grafting

The aim of this review is to highlight the role of invasive functional evaluation in patients in whom coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is indicated, and to examine the clinical evidence available in favour of fractional flow reserve (FFR) adoption in these patients, outline appropriate use, as well as point out potential pitfalls. FFR after CABG will also be reviewed, highlighting its correct interpretation and adoption when applied to both native coronary arteries and bypass grafts. Practice European guidelines support the use of FFR to complement coronary angiography with the highest degree of recommendation (Class IA) for the assessment of coronary stenosis before undertaking myocardial revascularization when previous non-invasive functional evaluation is unavailable or not conclusive. As a result, FFR has been adopted in routine clinical practice to guide clinicians decision as to whether or not perform a revascularization. Of note, due to the increasing confidence of the interventional cardiologists, FFR guidance is also being implemented to indicate or guide CABG. This is in anticipation of supportive clear-cut evidence, since recommendations for FFR adoption were based on randomized clinical trials investigating percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies in which patients with typical indications for CABG were excluded (e.g. left main disease, valvular disease, and coronary anatomy unsuitable for PCI). Based on the critical appraisal of the literature, FFR can play an important role in risk stratification and determining management strategy of patients either before or after CABG.

Role of Proximal Optimization Technique Guided by Intravascular Ultrasound on Stent Expansion, Stent Symmetry Index, and Side-Branch Hemodynamics in Patients With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

BACKGROUND

Bench models of coronary bifurcation lesions demonstrated that the proximal optimization technique (POT) expanded the stent and opened the side branch (SB). We investigated the role of POT guided by intravascular ultrasound on the main vessel (MV) stent expansion and SB fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with coronary bifurcation lesion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 40 patients with coronary bifurcation lesion, 120 intravascular ultrasound examinations of the MV were performed at baseline, after MV stenting, and POT followed by 95 FFR measurements of the SB. In the proximal stent segment, stent volume index and minimum stent area were larger after POT versus MV stenting (9.2±3.4 versus 7.40±2.0 mm³/mm and 7.65±1.8 versus 6.38±1.7 mm², respectively; P<0.01). In the bifurcation segment, minimum stent area was larger after POT versus MV stenting (6.45±2.1 versus 5.9±2.0 mm², respectively; P<0.05). POT expanded the stent symmetrically. After POT, SB FFR was <0.75 in 12 patients (30%), which improved to >0.75 after SB dilation or SB stenting+final POT. SB FFR was significantly higher after POT+SB dilation or SB stenting+final POT versus after MV stenting and POT.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study of POT guided by intravascular ultrasound in patients with coronary bifurcation lesion, demonstrating that POT symmetrically expanded the proximal and bifurcation segments of the stent. After POT, SB FFR was <0.75 in a third of patients, which improved to >0.75 after SB dilation or SB stenting+final POT.

Comparison of Fractional FLow Reserve And Intravascular ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients with InteRmediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR): Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Coronary angiography has limitations in defining the ischemia-causing stenotic lesion, especially in cases with intermediate coronary stenosis. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a current standard method to define the presence of ischemia, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is the most commonly used invasive imaging tool that can provide the lesion geometry and can provide the information on plaque vulnerability. The primary aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of FFR-guided and IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.

TRIAL DESIGN

Comparison of Fractional FLow Reserve And Intravascular ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients with InteRmediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial is an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial. A total of 1,700 consecutive patients with intermediate stenosis (40%-70% by visual estimation) in a major epicardial coronary artery will be randomized 1:1 to receive either FFR-guided or IVUS-guided PCI strategy. Patients will be treated with PCI according to the predefined criteria for revascularization; FFR ≤ 0.80 in the FFR-guided group and Minimal Lumen Area (MLA) ≤3 mm² (or 3 mm²<MLA ≤4 mm² and plaque burden >70%) in the IVUS-guided group. The primary end point is the patient-oriented composite outcome, which is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and any repeat revascularization at 24months after randomization. We will test noninferiority of current standard FFR-guided PCI strategy compared with IVUS-guided decision for PCI and stent optimization strategy.

CONCLUSION

The FLAVOUR trial will compare the safety and efficacy of FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI strategies in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. This study will provide an insight on optimal evaluation and treatment strategy for patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.

Assessment of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve with positron emission tomography in ischemic heart disease: current state and future directions

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a versatile imaging technology that allows assessment of myocardial perfusion, both at a spatially relative scale and also in absolute terms, thereby enabling noninvasive evaluation of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR). Assessment of MBF using FDA-approved PET isotopes, such as ⁸²Rb and ¹³N-ammonia, has been well validated, and several software packages are currently available, thereby allowing for MBF evaluation to be incorporated into routine workflow in contemporary nuclear laboratories. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic information provided with the knowledge of MBF has the potential for widespread applications. Improving the ability to identify the true burden of obstructive epicardial coronary stenoses and allowing for noninvasive assessment of coronary micro circulatory function can be achieved with MBF assessment. On the other hand, attenuated CFR has been shown to predict adverse cardiovascular prognosis in a variety of clinical settings and patient subgroups. With expanding applications of MBF, this tool promises to provide unique insight into the integrity of the entire coronary vascular bed beyond what is currently available with relative perfusion assessment. This review intends to provide an in-depth discussion of technical and clinical aspects of MBF assessment with PET as it relates to patients with ischemic heart disease.

Cardiogoniometry Compared to Fractional Flow Reserve at Identifying Physiologically Significant Coronary Stenosis: The CARDIOFLOW Study

Cardiogoniometry (CGM) is method of 3-dimensional electrocardiographic assessment which has been shown to identify patients with angiographically defined, stable coronary artery disease (CAD). However, angiographic evidence of CAD, does not always correlate to physiologically significant disease. The aim of our study was to assess the ability of CGM to detect physiologically significant coronary stenosis defined by fractional flow reserve (FFR). In a tertiary cardiology centre, elective patients with single vessel CAD were enrolled into a prospective double blinded observational study. A baseline CGM recording was performed at rest. A second CGM recording was performed during the FFR procedure, at the time of adenosine induced maximal hyperaemia. A significant CGM result was defined as an automatically calculated ischaemia score < 0 and a significant FFR ratio was defined as < 0.80. Measures of diagnostic performance (including sensitivity and specificity) were calculated for CGM at rest and during maximal hyperaemia. Forty-five patients were included (aged 61.1 ± 11.0; 60.0% male), of which eighteen (40%) were found to have significant CAD when assessed by FFR. At rest, CGM yielded a sensitivity of 33.3% and specificity of 63.0%. At maximal hyperaemia the sensitivity and specificity of CGM was 71.4 and 50.0% respectively. The diagnostic performance of CGM to detect physiologically significant stable CAD is poor at rest. Although, the diagnostic performance of CGM improves substantially during maximal hyperaemia, it does not reach sufficient levels of accuracy to be used routinely in clinical practice.

Past, Present and Future of Coronary Physiology

It is well known that the apparent significant coronary stenosis on angiography sometimes does not cause significant ischemia, and vice versa. For this reason, decision-making based on coronary physiology is becoming more and more important. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), which has emerged as a useful tool to determine which lesions need revascularization in the catheterization laboratory, now has a class IA indication in the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. More recently, the instantaneous wave-free ratio, which is considered easier to use than FFR, has been graded as equivalent to FFR. This review discusses the concepts of FFR and instantaneous wave-free ratio, current evidence supporting their use, and future directions in coronary physiology.

Reasons and implications of agreements and disagreements between coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and myocardial perfusion imaging

Information on coronary physiology and myocardial blood flow (MBF) in patients with suspected angina is increasingly important to inform treatment decisions. A number of different techniques including myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), noninvasive estimation of MBF, and coronary flow reserve (CFR), as well as invasive methods for CFR and fractional flow reserve (FFR) are now readily available. However, despite their incorporation into contemporary guidelines, these techniques are still poorly understood and their interpretation to guide revascularization decisions is often inconsistent. In particular, these inconsistencies arise when there are discrepancies between the various techniques. The purpose of this article is therefore to review the basic principles, techniques, and clinical value of MPI, FFR, and CFR-with particular focus on interpreting their agreements and disagreements.