Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Clinical Practice

Influence of the pressure wire on the fractional flow reserve calculation: CFD analysis of an ideal vessel and clinical patients with stenosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is generally considered the gold standard in hemodynamics to assess the impact of a stenosis on the blood flow. The standard procedure to measure involves the displacement of a pressure guide along the circulatory system until it is placed next to the lesion to be analyzed. The main objective of the present study is to analyze the influence of the pressure guide on the invasive FFR measurements and its implications in clinical practice.

METHODS

We studied the influence of pressure wires on the measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) through a combination of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations using 45 clinical patient data with 58 lesions and ideal geometries. The analysis is conducted considering patients that were subjected to a computer tomography and also have direct measurements using a pressure guide. Influence of the stenosis severity, degree of occlusion and blood viscosity has also been studied.

RESULTS

The influence of pressure wires specifically affects severe stenosis with a lumen diameter reduction of 50 % or greater. This type of stenosis leads to reduced hyperemic flow and increased coronary pressure drop. Thus, we identified that the placement of wires during FFR measurements results in partial obstruction of the coronary artery lumen, leading to increased pressure drop and subsequent reduction in blood flow. The severity of low FFR values associated with severe stenosis may be prone to overestimation when compared to stenosis without severe narrowing. These results have practical implications, particularly in the interpretation of lesions falling within the "gray zone" (0,75-0,80).

CONCLUSIONS

The pressure wire's presence significantly alters the flow on severe lesions, which has an impact on the FFR calculation. In contrast, the impact of the pressure wire appears to be reduced when the FFR is larger than 0.8. The findings provide critical information for physicians, emphasizing the need for cautious interpretation of FFR values, particularly in severe stenosis. It also offers insights into improving the correlation between FFRct models and invasive measurements by incorporating the influence of pressure wires.

Rapid and Precise Computation of Fractional Flow Reserve from Routine Two-Dimensional Coronary Angiograms Based on Fluid Mechanics: The Pilot FFR2D Study

Objective: To present a novel pipeline for rapid and precise computation of fractional flow reserve from an analysis of routine two-dimensional coronary angiograms based on fluid mechanics equations (FFR2D). Material and methods: This was a pilot analytical study that was designed to assess the diagnostic performance of FFR2D versus the gold standard of FFR (threshold ≤ 0.80) measured with a pressure wire for the physiological assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenoses. In a single academic center, consecutive patients referred for diagnostic coronary angiography and potential revascularization between 1 September 2020 and 1 September 2022 were screened for eligibility. Routine two-dimensional angiograms at optimal viewing angles with minimal overlap and/or foreshortening were segmented semi-automatically to derive the vascular geometry of intermediate coronary lesions, and nonlinear pressure-flow mathematical relationships were applied to compute FFR2D. Results: Some 88 consecutive patients with a single intermediate coronary artery lesion were analyzed (LAD n = 74, RCA n = 9 and LCX n = 5; percent diameter stenosis of 45.7 ± 11.0%). The computed FFR2D was on average 0.821 ± 0.048 and correlated well with invasive FFR (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). There was very good agreement between FFR2D and invasive-wire FFR with minimal measurement bias (mean difference: 0.000 ± 0.048). The overall accuracy of FFR2D for diagnosing a critical epicardial artery stenosis was 90.9% (80 cases classified correctly out of 88 in total). FFR2D identified 24 true positives, 56 true negatives, 4 false positives, and 4 false negatives and predicted FFR ≤ 0.80 with a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 93.3%, positive likelihood ratio of 13.0, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.15. FFR2D had a significantly better discriminatory capacity (area under the ROC curve: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.91-0.99]) compared to 50%DS on 2D-QCA (area under the ROC curve: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.59-0.82]; p = 0.0001) in predicting wire FFR ≤ 0.80. The median time of image analysis was 2 min and the median time of computation of the FFR2D results was 0.1 s. Conclusion: FFR2D may rapidly derive a precise image-based metric of fractional flow reserve with high diagnostic accuracy based on a single two-dimensional coronary angiogram.

Effect of prolonged pressure equalization on final drifting during pressure wire studies

Pressure drifting is a troublesome error in invasive coronary function tests. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between prolonged and short-time pressure equalizations in pressure drifting. Pressure drifting was defined as the pressure gradient between the mean pressure of the distal wire sensor (Pd) and aortic pressure (Pa) when the wire was withdrawn to the tip of the guiding catheter. Significant drifts 1 and 2 were defined as the absolute values of pressure gradients > 2 and > 3 mmHg, respectively. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the associations between prolonged pressure equalization and each pressure drifting. The prolonged pressure equalization strategy was associated with a lower incidence of drift 1 than the short-time pressure equalization strategy (6.84% vs. 16.92%, p < 0.05). However, no statistical differences were found in the incidence of drift 2 between the prolonged and short-time pressure equalization strategies (4.27% vs. 7.69%, p = 0.34). In the multivariable regression model, only the prolonged pressure equalization strategy predicted a lower incidence of pressure drift 1. In conclusion, the prolonged pressure equalization strategy was associated with a lower incidence of significant pressure drifting with more stringent thresholds than the short-time pressure equalization strategy.

In-vitro validation of coronary physiology assessment with 5 French guiding catheters

BACKGROUND

The trans-radial approach for cardiac catheterization led to an increasing adoption of 5 French (F) catheters. We aim to evaluate reliability and reproducibility of coronary physiology assessment performed with 5F guiding catheter (GC).

METHODS

Physiological measurements were performed in a coronary flow simulator, which provides two pulsatile flows, the baseline and hyperaemic flows. Two screws, positioned proximally and distally to the distal sensor of a pressure-temperature guidewire, were used to determine various combinations of stenoses and distal obstructions, simulating different pathophysiological conditions. For each setting, 5 measurements of fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR) were performed with 6F and 5F GCs.

RESULTS

A total amount of 190 measurements were performed, 95 with 6F GC and 95 with 5F GC. Minimal differences between 6F and 5F GCs were detected for FFR [0.91 (IQR: 0.87-0.94) and 0.87 (IQR: 0.82-0.92) respectively, p < 0.001] and IMR (16.5 ± 8.8 and 15.4 ± 8.3 respectively, p = 0.001). Mean CFR was comparable between 6F and 5F GCs (3.6 ± 1.1 and 3.5 ± 0.7 respectively, p = 0.38). Misclassification rates were 1.0 %, 1.0 % and 0 % for FFR, CFR and IMR, respectively. According to Passing-Bablok analysis, an excellent agreement between 6F and 5F GCs was demonstrated for FFR and IMR, and a modest agreement for CFR. All measurements with 5F GC showed high reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

In our in-vitro model, a complete physiological assessment including FFR, CFR and IMR resulted substantially comparable between 6F and 5F GCs. Further in-vivo analysis is required to support these findings.

Changes in post-PCI physiology based on anatomical vessel location: a DEFINE PCI substudy

BACKGROUND

Anatomical vessel location affects post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) physiology.

AIMS

We aimed to compare the post-PCI instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in left anterior descending (LAD) versus non-LAD vessels and to identify the factors associated with a suboptimal post-PCI iFR.

METHODS

DEFINE PCI was a multicentre, prospective, observational study in which a blinded post-PCI iFR pullback was used to assess residual ischaemia following angiographically successful PCI.

RESULTS

Pre- and post-PCI iFR recordings of 311 LAD and 195 non-LAD vessels were compared. Though pre-PCI iFR in the LAD vessels (median 0.82 [0.63, 0.86]) were higher compared with those in non-LAD vessels (median 0.72 [0.49, 0.84]; p<0.0001), post-PCI iFR were lower in the LAD vessels (median 0.92 [0.88, 0.94] vs 0.98 [0.95, 1.00]; p<0.0001). The prevalence of a suboptimal post-PCI iFR of <0.95 was higher in the LAD vessels (77.8% vs 22.6%; p<0.0001). While the overall frequency of residual physiological diffuse disease (31.4% vs 38.6%; p=0.26) and residual focal disease in the non-stented segment (49.6% vs 50.0%; p=0.99) were similar in both groups, residual focal disease within the stented segment was more common in LAD versus non-LAD vessels (53.7% vs 27.3%; p=0.0009). Improvement in iFR from pre- to post-PCI was associated with angina relief regardless of vessel location.

CONCLUSIONS

After angiographically successful PCI, post-PCI iFR is lower in the LAD compared with non-LAD vessels, resulting in a higher prevalence of suboptimal post-PCI iFR in LAD vessels. This difference is, in part, due to a greater frequency of a residual focal pressure gradient within the stented segment which may be amenable to more aggressive PCI.

Coronary Artery Stenosis Evaluation by Angiography-Derived FFR: Validation by Positron Emission Tomography and Invasive Thermodilution

BACKGROUND

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from invasive coronary angiography (QFR) is promising for evaluation of intermediate coronary artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of QFR and the guideline-recommended invasive FFR using 82Rubidium positron emission tomography (82Rb-PET) myocardial perfusion imaging as reference standard.

METHODS

This is a prospective, observational study of symptomatic patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomography angiography (≥50% diameter stenosis in ≥1 vessel). All patients were referred to 82Rb-PET and invasive coronary angiography with FFR and QFR assessment of all intermediate (30%-90% diameter stenosis) stenoses. Main analyses included a comparison of the ability of QFR and FFR to identify reduced myocardial blood flow (<2 mL/g/min) during vasodilation and/or relative perfusion abnormalities (summed stress score ≥4 in ≥2 adjacent segments).

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients (320 vessels) with indication for invasive physiological assessment were included. The continuous relationship of 82Rb-PET stress myocardial blood flow per 0.10 increase in FFR was +0.14 mL/g/min (95% CI: 0.07-0.21 mL/g/min) and +0.08 mL/g/min (95% CI: 0.02-0.14 mL/g/min) per 0.10 QFR increase. Using 82Rb-PET as reference, QFR and FFR had similar diagnostic performance on both a per-patient level (accuracy: 73%; 95% CI: 67%-79%; vs accuracy: 71%; 95% CI: 64%-78%) and per-vessel level (accuracy: 70%; 95% CI: 64%-75%; vs accuracy: 68%; 95% CI: 62%-73%). The per-vessel feasibility was 84% (95% CI: 80%-88%) for QFR and 88% (95% CI: 85%-92%) for FFR by intention-to-diagnose analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

With 82Rb-PET as reference modality, the wire-free QFR solution showed similar diagnostic accuracy as invasive FFR in evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis. (DAN-NICAD - Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease; NCT02264717).

Invasive physiologic assessment of coronary artery stenosis by resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve: a prospective observational study

Resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), an alternative to fractional flow reserve (FFR) for evaluating intermediate coronary artery stenosis, helps reduce patients' time, cost, and discomfort. However, the validation data for RFR and FFR are lacking. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of RFR and FFR and evaluate effective decision-making for revascularization using their values. Patients subjected to an invasive physiological study for intermediate coronary artery stenosis in Yongin Severance hospital between October 2020 and April 2022 were prospectively and consecutively recruited. We evaluated the correlation between RFR and FFR measurements and the diagnostic performance of RFR (≤ 0.89) versus FFR (≤ 0.80). In all, 474 intermediate coronary stenosis lesions from 400 patients were evaluated using RFR and FFR values. There was a strong linear relationship between RFR and FFR (r = 0.75, 95% CI 0.70-0.78, p < 0.01). Comparing diagnostic performance between RFR and FFR, RFR demonstrated diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 85.0%, 80.0%, 86.7%, 67.1%, and 92.7%, respectively. We analyzed the RFR value in the hyperemia zone (0.86-0.93) according to positive (RFR: 0.86-0.89) and negative (RFR: 0.90-0.93) areas. PPV in positive area is 47.8% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 33.8% to 62.0%) and NPV in negative area is 87.7% (95% CI: 80.3% to 93.1%). Excellent correlation exists between RFR and FFR and the diagnostic value of RFR without hyperemia compared with FFR in establishing the accurate functional significance of coronary artery stenosis was shown. RFR alone could evaluate the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis without unnecessary hyperemia, except in the positive area.Trial registration: URL: http://trialsearch.who.int ; Unique identifier: KCT0005255.

Coronary angiography-derived index for assessing microcirculatory resistance in patients with non-obstructed vessels: The FLASH IMR study

BACKGROUND

Assessing index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is customarily performed using intracoronary wires fitted with sensors by at least 3 intracoronary injections of 3 to 4 mL of room-temperature saline during sustained hyperemia, which is time- and cost-consuming.

METHODS

The FLASH IMR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized study to assess the diagnostic performance of coronary angiography-derived IMR (caIMR) in patients with suspected myocardial ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries using wire-based IMR as a reference. The caIMR was calculated by an optimized computational fluid dynamics model simulating hemodynamics during diastole based on coronary angiograms. TIMI frame count and aortic pressure were included in computation. caIMR was determined onsite in real time and compared blind to wire-based IMR by an independent core laboratory, using wire-based IMR ≥25 units as indicative of abnormal coronary microcirculatory resistance. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of caIMR, using wire-based IMR as a reference, with a pre-specified performance goal of 82%.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients underwent paired caIMR and wire-based IMR measurements. Order of performance of tests was based on randomization. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of caIMR were 93.8% (95% CI: 87.7%-97.5%), 95.1% (95% CI: 83.5%- 99.4%), 93.1% (95% CI: 84.5%-97.7%), 88.6% (95% CI: 75.4%-96.2%) and 97.1% (95% CI: 89.9%-99.7%). The receiver-operating curve for caIMR to diagnose abnormal coronary microcirculatory resistance had area under the curve of 0.963 (95% CI: 0.928-0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

Angiography-based caIMR has a good diagnostic yield with wire-based IMR.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT05009667.

Fractional flow reserve or 3D-quantitative-coronary-angiography based vessel-FFR guided revascularization. Rationale and study design of the prospective randomized fast III trial

BACKGROUND

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions to guide coronary revascularization is currently recommended by international guidelines. Vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) has emerged as a new approach to derive fractional flow reserve (FFR) from 3D-quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) without the need for hyperemic agents or pressure wires.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES

The FAST III is an investigator-initiated, open label, multicenter randomized trial comparing vFFR guided versus FFR guided coronary revascularization in approximately 2228 patients with intermediate coronary lesions (defined as 30%-80% stenosis by visual assessment or QCA). Intermediate lesions are physiologically assessed using on-line vFFR or FFR and treated if vFFR or FFR ≤0.80. The primary end point is a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization at 1-year post-randomization. Secondary end points include the individual components of the primary end point and cost-effectiveness will be investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

FAST III is the first randomized trial to explore whether a vFFR guided revascularization strategy is non-inferior to an FFR guided strategy in terms of clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up in patients with intermediate coronary artery lesions.

Optimal Measurement Sites of Coronary-Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The Insight From China CT-FFR Study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the optimal measurement site of coronary-computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the whole clinical routine practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 396 CAD patients who underwent coronary-computed tomography angiography, FFR CT , and invasive FFR. FFR CT was measured at 1 cm (FFR CT -1 cm), 2 cm (FFR CT -2 cm), 3 cm (FFR CT -3 cm), and 4 cm (FFR CT -4 cm) distal to coronary stenosis, respectively. FFR CT and invasive FFR ≤0.80 were defined as lesion-specific ischemia. The diagnostic performance of FFR CT to detect ischemia was obtained using invasive FFR as the reference standard. Reduced invasive coronary angiography rate and revascularization efficiency were calculated. After a median follow-up of 35 months in 267 patients for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), Cox hazard proportional models were performed with FFR CT values at each measurement site.

RESULTS

For discriminating lesion-specific ischemia, the areas under the curve of FFR CT -1 cm (0.91) as well as FFR CT -2 cm (0.91) were higher than those of FFR CT -3 cm (0.89) and FFR CT -4 cm (0.88), respectively (all P <0.05). The higher reduced invasive coronary angiography rate (81.6%) was found at FFR CT -1 cm than FFR CT -2 cm (81.6% vs. 62.6%, P <0.05). Revascularization efficiency did not differ between FFR CT -1 cm and FFR CT -2 cm (80.8% vs. 65.5%, P =0.019). In 12.4% (33/267) MACE occurred and only values of FFR CT -2 cm were independently predictive of MACE (hazard ratio: 0.957 [95% CI: 0.925-0.989]; P =0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates FFR CT -2 cm is the optimal measurement site with superior diagnostic performance and independent prognostic role.

Prognostic value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention diastolic pressure ratio

Aim

To evaluate the distribution of a generic diastolic pressure ratio (dPR) after angiographically successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to assess its association with the 2‑year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel revascularisation, target vessel myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis.

Methods

The dPR SEARCH study is a post hoc analysis of the prospective single-centre FFR-SEARCH registry, in which physiological assessment was performed after angiographically successful PCI in a total of 1000 patients, using a dedicated microcatheter. dPR was calculated offline with recently validated software in a subset of 735 patients.

Results

Mean post-PCI dPR was 0.95 ± 0.06. Post-PCI dPR was ≤ 0.89 in 15.2% of the patients. The cumulative incidence of TVF at 2‑year follow-up was 9.4% in patients with a final post-PCI dPR ≤ 0.89 as compared to 6.1% in patients with a post-PCI dPR > 0.89 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for dPR ≤ 0.89: 1.53; 95% CI 0.74–3.13; p = 0.249). dPR ≤ 0.89 was associated with significantly higher cardiac mortality at 2 years; adjusted HR 2.40; 95% CI 1.01–5.68; p = 0.047.

Conclusions

In a real-world setting, despite optimal angiographic PCI results, 15.2% of the patients had a final post-PCI dPR of ≤ 0.89, which was associated with a higher incidence of TVF and a significantly higher cardiac mortality rate.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-022-01680-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

CT Fractional Flow Reserve: A Practical Guide to Application, Interpretation, and Problem Solving

CT fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) is a physiologic simulation technique that models coronary flow from routine coronary CT angiography (CTA). To evaluate lesion-specific ischemia, FFR_CT is measured 2 cm distal to a stenotic lesion. FFR_CT greater than 0.8 is normal, 0.76-0.8 is borderline, and 0.75 or less is abnormal. FFR_CT should always be interpreted in correlation with clinical and anatomic coronary CTA findings. FFR_CT increases the specificity of coronary CTA in the evaluation of coronary artery disease, decreases the prevalence of nonobstructive disease in invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and helps with revascularization decisions and planning. Patients with intermediate-risk coronary anatomy at CTA and abnormal FFR_CT can undergo ICA and revascularization, whereas those with normal FFR_CT can be safely deferred from ICA. In borderline FFR_CT values, management is decided in the context of the clinical scenario, but many cases could be safely managed with medical treatment. There are some limitations and pitfalls of FFR_CT. Abnormal FFR_CT values can be seen in mild stenosis, and normal FFR_CTvalues can be seen in severe stenosis. Gradually decreasing or abnormal low FFR_CT values at the distal vessel without a proximal focal lesion could be due to diffuse atherosclerosis. Coronary stents, bypass grafts, coronary anomalies, coronary dissection, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, unstable angina, and acute or recent myocardial infarction are situations in which FFR_CT has not been validated and should not be used at this time. The authors provide a practical guide to the applications and interpretation of FFR_CT, focusing on common pitfalls and challenges. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

1-Year Outcomes of Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful PCI: DEFINE PCI Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify the post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) target value of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) that would best discriminate clinical events at 1 year in the DEFINE PCI (Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Following PCI) study.

BACKGROUND

The impact of residual ischemia detected by iFR post-PCI on clinical and symptom-related outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

Blinded iFR pull back was performed after successful stent implantation in 500 patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of residual ischemia, defined as iFR ≤0.89, after operator-assessed angiographically successful PCI. Secondary endpoints included clinical events at 1 year and change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency (SAQ-AF) score during follow-up.

RESULTS

As reported, 24.0% of patients had residual ischemia (iFR ≤0.89) after successful PCI, with 81.6% of cases attributable to angiographically inapparent focal lesions. Post-PCI iFR ≥0.95 (present in 182 cases [39%]) was associated with a significant reduction in the composite of cardiac death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization compared with post-PCI iFR <0.95 (1.8% vs 5.7%; P = 0.04). Baseline SAQ-AF score was 73.3 ± 22.8. For highly symptomatic patients (baseline SAQ-AF score ≤60), SAQ-AF score increased by ≥10 points more frequently in patients with versus without post-PCI iFR ≥0.95 (100.0% vs 88.5%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In DEFINE PCI, despite angiographically successful PCI, highly symptomatic patients at baseline without residual ischemia by post-PCI iFR had greater reductions in anginal symptoms at 1 year compared with patients with residual ischemia. Achieving post-PCI iFR ≥0.95 was also associated with improved 1-year event-free survival. (Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Following PCI [DEFINE PCI]; NCT03084367).

Linear concentration-response relationship of serum caffeine with adenosine-induced fractional flow reserve overestimation: a comparison with papaverine

BACKGROUND

Caffeine intake from one cup of coffee one hour before adenosine stress tests, corresponding to serum caffeine levels of 3-4 mg/L, is thought to be acceptable for non-invasive imaging.

AIMS

We aimed to elucidate whether serum caffeine is independently associated with adenosine-induced fractional flow reserve (FFR) overestimation and their concentration-response relationship.

METHODS

FFR was measured using adenosine (FFRADN) and papaverine (FFRPAP) in 209 patients. FFRADN overestimation was defined as FFRADN - FFRPAP. The locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) approach was applied to evaluate the relationship between serum caffeine level and FFRADN overestimation. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine independent factors associated with FFRADN overestimation.

RESULTS

Caffeine was ingested at <12 hours in 85 patients, at 12-24 hours in 35 patients, and at >24 hours in 89 patients. Multiple regression analysis identified serum caffeine level as the strongest factor associated with FFRADN overestimation (p<0.001). The LOWESS curve demonstrated that FFRADN overestimation started from just above the lower detection limit of serum caffeine and increased approximately 0.01 FFR unit per 1 mg/L increase in serum caffeine level with a linear relationship. The 90th percentile of serum caffeine levels for the ≤12-hour, the 12-24-hour, and the >24-hour groups corresponded to FFRADN overestimations by 0.06, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum caffeine overestimates FFRADN values in a linear concentration-response manner. FFRADN overestimation occurs at much lower serum caffeine levels than those that were previously believed. Our results highlight that standardised caffeine control is required for reliable adenosine-induced FFR measurements.

Optimising physiological endpoints of percutaneous coronary intervention

Invasive coronary physiology to select patients for coronary revascularisation has become established in contemporary guidelines for the management of stable coronary artery disease. Compared to revascularisation based on angiography alone, the use of coronary physiology has been shown to improve clinical outcomes and cost efficiency. However, recent data from randomised controlled trials have cast doubt upon the value of ischaemia testing to select patients for revascularisation. Importantly, 20-40% of patients have persistence or recurrence of angina after angiographically successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This state-of-the-art review is focused on the transitioning role of invasive coronary physiology from its use as a dichotomous test for ischaemia with fixed cut-points, towards its utility for real-time guidance of PCI to optimise physiological results. We summarise the contemporary evidence base for ischaemia testing in stable coronary artery disease, examine emerging indices which allow advanced physiological guidance of PCI, and discuss the rationale and evidence base for post-PCI physiological assessments to assess the success of revascularisation.

Assessing the Accuracy of a second-generation optical sensor pressor wire in a wire to wire comparison (The ACCURACY study)

BACKGROUND

The phenomenon of "pressure drift" increases uncertainty about the correct FFR value. Redesigned and incorporating an optical pressure sensor, the "OptoWire Deux™" is purported to be less prone to the pressure drift seen with piezoelectric coronary pressure wires. The aim of this first in vivo real-world clinical study is to evaluate the performance of OptoWire Deux™ in terms of measurements agreement and propensity to pressure drift in a wire to wire comparison.

METHODS

This is a single center, prospective, non-blinded clinical investigation enrolling 45 consecutive patients with a clinical indication for coronary lesion FFR assessment. Lesions were either simultaneously assessed with two optical sensor pressure wires (OSPW) (Group O-O; 30 patients, 34 lesions) or one OSPW and one piezoelectric pressure wire (PEPW) simultaneously (Group O-P; 15 patients, 15 lesions). Significant drift was defined as a pressure ratio deviation of >0.03.

RESULTS

Mean FFR measurements in Group OO were not statistically different between the two sets of OSPW (overall 0.84±0.10; P = 0.52). In Group OP, however, mean FFR measurement with PEPW (0.85±0.09) was numerically lower than that observed with the OSPW (0.88±0.08; P = 0.09). Level of agreement using the Bland-Altman method was higher when 2 OSPW were used for FFR assessment (-0.002 95% CI [-0.033,0.029] vs. 0.026 95% CI [-0.078, 0.130], respectively). The rate of drift was significantly lower with an OSPW compared to a PEPW (4.8% vs. 26.7% respectively, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The optical sensor guidewire showed a high level of readings' agreement after simultaneous usage of 2 optical sensor guidewires. There was also significantly less drift when compared to a piezoelectric guidewire.

Diagnostic performance and clinical implications for enhancing a hybrid quantitative flow ratio-FFR revascularization decision-making strategy

Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) adoption remains low mainly due to procedural and operator related factors as well as costs. Alternatively, quantitative flow ratio (QFR) achieves a high accuracy mainly outside the intermediate zone without the need for hyperaemia and wire-use. We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of QFR and to evaluate a QFR-FFR hybrid strategy in which FFR is measured only in the intermediate zone. This retrospective study included 289 consecutive patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography and FFR. QFR was calculated for all vessels in which FFR was measured. The QFR-FFR hybrid approach was modelled using the intermediate zone of 0.77-0.87 in which FFR-measurements are recommended. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy on a per vessel-based analysis were 84.6%, 86.3% and 85.6% for QFR and 88.0%, 92.9% and 90.3% for the QFR-FFR hybrid approach. The diagnostic accuracy of QFR-FFR hybrid strategy with invasive FFR measurement was 93.4% and resulted in a 56.7% reduction in the need for FFR. QFR has a good correlation and agreement with invasive FFR. A hybrid QFR-FFR approach could extend the use of QFR and reduces the proportion of invasive FFR-measurements needed while improving accuracy.

Functional assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenosis with 4-Fr catheters

The 4-Fr catheter system is not recommended for invasive functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis, because it tends to distort the aortic waveform. This study aimed to identify the incidence of aortic waveform distortion and a feasible method for correct diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis with a 4-Fr catheter. We retrospectively investigated 178 lesions with intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Non-hyperemic distal coronary artery pressure (Pd) and aortic pressure (Pa) were measured with a 4-Fr diagnostic or 6-Fr guiding catheter before and after saline flush. The mean Pd/mean Pa (Pd/Pa) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) were calculated before and after flushing. We compared the effect of flushing on the changes in Pd/Pa and iFR between the 4-Fr diagnostic and 6-Fr guiding catheters. Using the 4-Fr diagnostic catheter, there was a significant decrease in incidence of aortic waveform distortion from 42.0% (47 lesions) before flushing to 1.8% (2 lesions) after flushing (p < 0.001); the incidence was only 3.0% before saline flush and decreased to 0% after saline flush when using the 6-Fr guiding catheter. The presence of aortic waveform distortion influenced the iFR when the 4-Fr system was used. Functional measurements with the 4-Fr diagnostic catheter require adequate saline flush to remove the influence of aortic waveform distortion.

Referral of patients for fractional flow reserve using quantitative flow ratio

AIMS

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a recently developed technique to calculate fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on 3D quantitative coronary angiography and computational fluid dynamics, obviating the need for a pressure-wire and hyperaemia induction. QFR might be used to guide patient selection for FFR and subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) referral in hospitals not capable to perform FFR and PCI. We aimed to investigate the feasibility to use QFR to appropriately select patients for FFR referral.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography in a hospital where FFR and PCI could not be performed and were referred to our hospital for invasive FFR measurement, were included. Angiogram images from the referring hospitals were retrospectively collected for QFR analysis. Based on QFR cut-off values of 0.77 and 0.86, our patient cohort was reclassified to 'no referral' (QFR ≥0.86), referral for 'FFR' (QFR 0.78-0.85), or 'direct PCI' (QFR ≤0.77). In total, 290 patients were included. Overall accuracy of QFR to detect an invasive FFR of ≤0.80 was 86%. Based on a QFR cut-off value of 0.86, a 50% reduction in patient referral for FFR could be obtained, while only 5% of these patients had an invasive FFR of ≤0.80 (thus, these patients were incorrectly reclassified to the 'no referral' group). Furthermore, 22% of the patients that still need to be referred could undergo direct PCI, based on a QFR cut-off value of 0.77.

CONCLUSION

QFR is feasible to use for the selection of patients for FFR referral.

Diastolic pressure ratio: new approach and validation vs. the instantaneous wave-free ratio

AIMS

The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and whole-cycle Pd/Pa investigate coronary physiology during non-hyperaemic conditions. To test for unique physiologic properties of the wave-free period when making resting coronary pressure measurements, we compared post hoc a diastolic pressure ratio (dPR) and Pd/Pa against iFR for numerical similarity and test/retest repeatability.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eight hundred and ninety-three lesions from 833 subjects were included from the VERIFY 2 and CONTRAST studies. Diastolic pressure ratio and a linear transform of Pd/Pa were compared against iFR for diagnostic performance. Mean difference between dPR and iFR [Δ = -0.006 ± 0.011, r2 = 0.993, area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) = 0.997] mirrored the difference of two iFR measurements repeated immediately (Δ = <0.001 ± 0.004, r2 = 0.998, AUC = 1.00). Minor variations in the definition of dPR changed its value by <1-2% over a broad range of the cardiac cycle. A linear transform of Pd/Pa showed very good diagnostic performance (Δ = -0.012 ± 0.031, r2 = 0.927, AUC = 0.979). Post hoc iFR values were validated against real-time iFR values and matched almost exactly (average Δ = <0.001 ± 0.004, 99.6% within ±0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our dPR offers numerical equivalency to iFR. Despite different technical approaches for identifying the relevant period of diastole, the agreement between dPR and iFR and the insensitivity of dPR to minor variations in its definition further confirm numerical equivalency among resting metrics.

Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid-filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications

OBJECTIVES

We sought to develop an automatic method for correcting common errors in phasic pressure tracings for physiology-guided interventions on coronary and valvular stenosis.

BACKGROUND

Effective coronary and valvular interventions rely on accurate hemodynamic assessment. Phasic (subcycle) indexes remain intrinsic to valvular stenosis and are emerging for coronary stenosis. Errors, corrections, and clinical implications of fluid-filled catheter phasic pressure assessments have not been assessed in the current era of ubiquitous, high-fidelity pressure wire sensors.

METHODS

We recruited patients undergoing invasive coronary physiology assessment. Phasic aortic pressure signals were recorded simultaneously using a fluid-filled guide catheter and 0.014″ pressure wire before and after standard calibration as well as after pullback. We included additional subjects undergoing hemodynamic assessment before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Using the pressure wire as reference standard, we developed an automatic algorithm to match phasic pressures.

RESULTS

Removing pressure offset and temporal shift produced the largest improvements in root mean square (RMS) error between catheter and pressure wire signals. However, further optimization <1 mmHg RMS error was possible by accounting for differential gain and the oscillatory behavior of the fluid-filled guide. The impact of correction was larger for subcycle (like systole or diastole) versus whole-cycle metrics, indicating a key role for valvular stenosis and emerging coronary pressure ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

When calibrating phasic aortic pressure signals using a pressure wire, correction requires these parameters: offset, timing, gain, and oscillations (frequency and damping factor). Automatically eliminating common errors may improve some clinical decisions regarding physiology-based intervention.

Prediction of post-intervention fractional flow reserve in diffuse or sequential coronary stenosis considering the residual trans-stent pressure gradient: Post-intervention FFR in diffuse/sequential lesions

AIMS

Prediction of post-intervention fractional flow reserve (FFR) in a diffuse or sequential coronary lesion is difficult due to complex haemodynamic interactions between individual stenoses. Furthermore, the existence of a residual intra-stent pressure gradient makes the prediction difficult. We developed an equation predicting the post-intervention FFR in a diffuse/sequential lesion by considering intra-stent FFR gradient. The present study aims to validate the equation in an in vitro model and in clinical data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the in vitro experiment, three sequential coronary stenoses were made with a collateral flow. The correlation coefficient of the predicted FFR and the actual post-intervention FFR was 0.99, and the absolute difference was 0.008±0.006 (n=50). In the clinical data analysis, the correlation coefficient was 0.41, and the absolute difference was 0.06±0.05 (n=67). We applied a fixed value of intra-stent FFR gradient and a collateral flow index so that the equation can be used in clinical practice. The correlation coefficient became 0.28 and the absolute difference became 0.06±0.06.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, prediction of post-intervention FFR in a diffuse/sequential lesion is difficult even when residual intra-stent pressure gradient is considered.

Prognostic Value of Resting Distal-to-Aortic Coronary Pressure in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

The resting distal-to-aortic coronary pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) is a universally available, hyperemia-free physiological index of coronary stenosis. We investigated clinical outcomes according to resting Pd/Pa versus hyperemic fractional flow reserve (FFR).

METHODS

From the IRIS-FFR (Interventional Cardiology Research Incooperation Society Fractional Flow Reserve) registry, 7014 lesions in 4707 patients with valid resting Pd/Pa and FFR were included in this study. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE; a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and repeat intervention). The MACE rate was compared among resting Pd/Pa ≤0.92 and FFR ≤0.80. A marginal Cox model accounted for correlated data in patients with multiple lesions.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 2.0 years, 223 MACEs occurred. Resting Pd/Pa was an independent predictor for the occurrence of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.89 [95% CI, 1.32-2.71]; P=0.001) over clinical and angiographic variables. When resting Pd/Pa and FFR were added into a multivariable model, MACE was no longer significantly associated with resting Pd/Pa (aHR, 1.35 [95% CI, 0.93-1.97]; P=0.12) but remained to be associated with FFR (aHR, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.56-3.54]; P<0.001). Compared with lesions with normal value of resting Pa/Pa and FFR, lesions with abnormal values of either resting Pd/Pa (aHR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.17-3.84]; P=0.014) or FFR (aHR, 2.32 [95% CI, 1.52-3.55]; P<0.001) or both (aHR, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.57-3.57]; P<0.001) showed a significantly increased risk of the occurrence of MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

Resting Pd/Pa appeared to be a less-robust prognostic index than FFR. Resting Pd/Pa could be used as a prognostic index when hyperemic agents are contraindicated or not easily available. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01366404.

Extent of the difference between microcatheter and pressure wire-derived fractional flow reserve and its relation to optical coherence tomography-derived parameters

Background

Although previous studies demonstrated that microcatheter-derived fractional flow reserve (mc-FFR) tends to overestimate lesion severity compared to pressure wire-derived FFR (pw-FFR), the clinical utility of mc-FFR remains obscure. The extent of differences between the two FFR systems and its relation to a lesion-specific parameter remain unknown. In this study, we sought to compare mc-FFR with pw-FFR and determine the lower and upper mc-FFR cut-offs predicting ischemic and non-ischemic stenosis, using an ischemic and a clinical FFR threshold of 0.75 and 0.80 as references, respectively. We further explored optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters influencing the difference in FFR between the two systems.

Methods and results

In this study, 44 target vessels with intermediate de novo coronary artery lesion in 36 patients with stable ischemic heart disease were evaluated with mc-FFR, pw-FFR and OCT. Bland-Altman plots for mc-FFR versus pw-FFR showed a bias of −0.04 for lower mc-FFR values compared to pw-FFR values. The mc-FFR cut-off values of 0.73 and 0.79 corresponded to the 0.75 ischemic pw-FFR and 0.80 clinical pw-FFR thresholds with high predictive values, respectively. The differences in the two FFR measurements (pw-FFR minus mc-FFR) were negatively correlated with OCT-derived minimum lumen area (MLA) (R = −0.359, p = 0.011). The OCT-derived MLA of 1.36 mm² was a cut-off value for predicting the clinically significant difference between the two FFR measurements defined as >0.03.

Conclusion

Mc-FFR is clinically useful when the specific cut-offs are applied. An OCT-derived MLA accounts for the clinically significant difference in FFR between the two systems.

Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from CT: The State of Play in 2020

Fractional flow reserve derived from CT is a rapidly developing technique, with an increasing burden of literature supporting its potential role in the workup of patients suspected of having coronary artery disease.

Accuracy of computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to coronary angiography to derive fractional flow reserve: FLASH FFR

Aims

Conventional fractional flow reserve (FFR) is measured invasively using a coronary guidewire equipped with a pressure sensor. A non-invasive derived FFR would eliminate risk of coronary injury, minimize technical limitations, and potentially increase adoption. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a computational pressure-flow dynamics derived FFR (caFFR), applied to coronary angiography, compared to invasive FFR.

Methods and results

The FLASH FFR study was a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study conducted at six centres in China. Eligible patients had native coronary artery target lesions with visually estimated diameter stenosis of 30–90% and diagnosis of stable or unstable angina pectoris. Using computational pressure-fluid dynamics, in conjunction with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count, applied to coronary angiography, caFFR was measured online in real-time and compared blind to conventional invasive FFR by an independent core laboratory. The primary endpoint was the agreement between caFFR and FFR, with a pre-specified performance goal of 84%. Between June and December 2018, matched caFFR and FFR measurements were performed in 328 coronary arteries. Total operational time for caFFR was 4.54 ± 1.48 min. caFFR was highly correlated to FFR (R = 0.89, P = 0.76) with a mean bias of −0.002 ± 0.049 (95% limits of agreement −0.098 to 0.093). The diagnostic performance of caFFR vs. FFR was diagnostic accuracy 95.7%, sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 98.6%, positive predictive value 97.2%, negative predictive value 95.0%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.979.

Conclusions

Using wire-based FFR as the reference, caFFR has high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. caFFR could eliminate the need of a pressure wire, technical error and potentially increase adoption of physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn Unique Identifier: ChiCTR1800019522.

Accuracy of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for predicting physiological significance of coronary stenosis: a FAVOR II substudy

Background

Three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) enables reconstruction of a coronary artery in 3D from two angiographic image projections. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of 3D-QCA vs. 2-dimensional (2D) QCA in predicting physiologically significant coronary stenosis, using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard.

Methods

All interrogated vessels in the FAVOR II China study and the FAVOR II Europe-Japan study were assessed by 2D-QCA and 3D-QCA according to standard operating procedures in core laboratories. QCA analysts were blinded to the corresponding FFR values.

Results

A total of 645 vessels from 576 patients with 3D-QCA, 2D-QCA, and FFR were analyzed. Using the conventional cut-off value of 50% for percent diameter stenosis (DS%), 3D-QCA was more accurate in predicting FFR ≤0.80 than 2D-QCA [accuracy 74.0% (95% CI: 69.9-77.7%) vs. 64.9% (95% CI: 61.3-68.7%), difference: 9.1%, P<0.001]. Sensitivity was higher by 3D-QCA compared with 2D-QCA [69.1% (95% CI: 63.0-75.1%) vs. 47.1% (95% CI: 40.5-53.6%), difference: 22.0%, P<0.001] and specificity was similar [76.5% (95% CI: 72.5-80.6%) vs. 74.4% (95% CI: 70.2-78.6%), difference: 2.1%, P=0.40]. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly higher for 3D-QCA than for 2D-QCA [0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.84) vs. 0.66 (95% CI: 0.62-0.71), P<0.001].

Conclusions

3D-QCA demonstrated better diagnostic performance in predicting physiologically significant coronary stenosis compared with 2D-QCA, when FFR was used as the reference standard.

Optimizing the Technique for Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess Lesion-Specific Ischemia

Background:

Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR INV ) is the standard technique for assessing myocardial ischemia. Pressure distortions and measurement location may influence FFR INV interpretation. We report a technique for performing invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR INV ) by minimizing pressure distortions and identifying the proper location to measure FFR INV .

Methods:

FFR INV recordings were obtained prospectively during manual hyperemic pullback in 100 normal and diseased coronary arteries with single stenosis, using 4 measurements from the terminal vessel, distal-to-the-lesion, proximal vessel, and guiding catheter. FFR INV profiles were developed by plotting FFR INV values ( y -axis) and site of measurement ( x -axis), stratified by stenosis severity. FFR INV ≤0.8 was considered positive for lesion-specific ischemia.

Results:

Erroneous FFR INV values were observed in 10% of vessels because of aortic pressure distortion and in 21% because of distal pressure drift; these were corrected by disengagement of the guiding catheter and re-equalization of distal pressure/aortic pressure, respectively. There were significant declines in FFR INV from the proximal to the terminal vessel in normal and stenotic coronary arteries ( P <0.001). The rate of positive FFR INV was 41% when measured from the terminal vessel and 20% when measured distal-to-the-lesion ( P <0.001); 41.5% of positive terminal measurements were reclassified to negative when measured distal-to-the-lesion. Measuring FFR INV 20 to 30 mm distal-to-the-lesion (rather than from the terminal vessel) can reduce errors in measurement and optimize the assessment of lesion-specific ischemia.

Conclusions:

Meticulous technique (disengagement of the guiding catheter, FFR INV pullback) is required to avoid erroneous FFR INV , which occur in 31% of vessels. Even with optimal technique, FFR INV values are influenced by stenosis severity and the site of pressure measurement. FFR INV values from the terminal vessel may overestimate lesion-specific ischemia, leading to unnecessary revascularization.

Qualitative resting coronary pressure wave form analysis to predict fractional flow reserve

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictability of resting distal coronary pressure wave forms for fractional flow reserve (FFR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Resting coronary wave forms were qualitatively evaluated for the presence of (i) dicrotic notch, (ii) diastolic dipping, and (iii) ventricularisation. In a development cohort (n=88), a scoring system was developed that was then applied to a validation cohort (n=428) using a multivariable linear regression model to predict FFR and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to predict FFR ≤0.8. In the development cohort, all three qualitative parameters were independent predictors of FFR. However, in a multivariable linear regression model in the validation cohort, qualitative wave form analysis did not further improve the ability of resting distal coronary to aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) (p=0.80) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) (p=0.26) to predict FFR. Using ROC, the area under the curve of resting Pd/Pa (0.86 versus 0.86, p=0.08) and iFR (0.86 versus 0.86, p=0.26) did not improve by adding qualitative analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative coronary wave form analysis showed moderate classification agreement in predicting FFR but did not add substantially to the resting pressure gradients Pd/Pa and iFR; however, when discrepancies between quantitative and qualitative analyses are observed, artefact or pressure drift should be considered.

Technical aspects and limitations of fractional flow reserve measurement

BACKGROUND

The only indication for coronary revascularization is elimination of ischaemia. Invasive hemodynamic methods (fractional flow reserve - FFR and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are superior to coronary angiography in detection of lesions causing myocardial ischaemia. Current European guidelines for myocardial revascularization recommend using of FFR for detection of functional assessment of lesions severity in category IA and number of these procedures increases. However, routine usage of these methods requires knowledge of technical requirements and limitations.

AIM

The aim of the study is to summarise good clinical practice for FFR and iFR measurements with explanation of possible technical challenges, that are necessary for increasing of measurement accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Authors describe frequent technical mistakes and malpractice during invasive assessment of lesion severity in coronary arteries.

CT morphological index provides incremental value to machine learning based CT-FFR for predicting hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis

AIMS

To study the diagnostic performance of the ratio of Duke jeopardy score (DJS) to the minimal lumen diameter (MLD) at coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and machine learning based CT-FFR for differentiating functionally significant from insignificant lesions, with reference to fractional flow reserve (FFR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients who underwent both coronary CTA and FFR measurement at invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 2 weeks were retrospectively included in our study. CT-FFR, DJS/MLD_CT ratio, along with other parameters, including minimal luminal area (MLA), MLD, lesion length (LL), diameter stenosis, area stenosis, plaque burden, and remodeling index of lesions, were recorded. Lesions with FFR ≤0.8 were considered to be functionally significant. One hundred and twenty-nine patients with 166 lesions were ultimately included for analysis. The LL, diameter stenosis, area stenosis, plaque burden, DJS and DJS/MLD_CT ratio were all significantly longer or larger in the group of FFR ≤ 0.8 (p < 0.001 for all), while smaller MLA, MLD and CT-FFR value were also noted (p < 0.001 for all). CT-FFR and DJS/MLD_CT ratio showed the largest AUC among all single parameters (AUC = 0.85 and AUC = 0.83, respectively; p < 0.001 for both) for diagnosing functionally significant stenosis. Combining CT-FFR and DJS/MLD_CT ratio provided incremental value for discrimination between flow-limiting and non-flow-limiting coronary lesions and yielded the best diagnostic performance (accuracy of 83.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ML-based CT-FFR and DJS/MLD_CT allows accurate non-invasive discrimination between flow-limiting and non-flow-limiting coronary lesions.

Discordance between pressure drift after wire pullback and intracoronary distal pressure offset affects stenosis physiology appraisal

BACKGROUND

Drift is a well-known issue affecting intracoronary pressure measurements. A small pressure offset at the end of the procedure is generally considered acceptable, while repeat assessment is advised for drift exceeding ±2 mmHg. This practice implies that drift assessed after wire pullback equals that at the time of stenosis appraisal, but this assumption has not been systematically investigated. Our aim was to compare intra-and post-procedural pressure sensor drift and assess benefits of correction for intra-procedural drift and its effect on diagnostic classification.

METHODS

In 70 patients we compared intra- and post-procedural pressure drift for 120 hemodynamic tracings obtained at baseline and throughout the hyperemic response to intracoronary adenosine. Intra-procedural drift was derived from the intercept of the stenosis pressure gradient-velocity relationship. Diagnostic reclassification after correction for intra-procedural drift was assessed for the mean distal-to-aortic pressure ratio at baseline (Pd/Pa) and hyperemia (fractional flow reserve, FFR), and corresponding stenosis resistances.

RESULTS

Post- and intra-procedural drift exceeding the tolerated threshold was observed in 73% and 64% of the hemodynamic tracings, respectively. Discordance in terms of acceptable drift level was present for 42% of the tracings, with avoidable repeat physiological assessment in 25% and unacceptable intra-procedural drift unrecognized at final drift check in 17% of the tracings. Correction for intra-procedural drift caused higher reclassification rates for baseline than hyperemic functional indices.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-procedural pressure drift frequently does not match drift during physiological assessment. Tracing-specific correction for intra-procedural drift can potentially lower the risk of inadvertent diagnostic misclassification and prevent unnecessary repeats.