1
|
Khalefa BB, Ayyad M, Albandak M, Ayyad A, Yassin MNA, Awad AK. Left versus right ventricular pacing during TAVR and balloon aortic valvuloplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2024. [PMID: 38946136 DOI: 10.1111/pace.15032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While right ventricular pacing (RVP) is the conventional temporary pacing modality used for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), this approach possesses inherent risks and procedural challenges. We aim to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of left ventricular pacing (LVP) and RVP during TAVR and balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in four databases from inception to December 15th, 2023. We included observational studies and clinical trials comparing LVP with RVP during TAVR and BAV procedures. Primary outcomes included short-term mortality, mortality due to cardiac tamponade, and procedural complications including bleeding, vascular complications, and cardiac tamponade. Secondary outcomes comprised procedure duration and length of hospital stay. RESULTS Five studies involving 830 patients with RVP and 1577 with LVP were included. Short-term mortality was significantly higher in the RVP group (RR 2.32, 95% CI: [1.37-3.93], P = .002), as was the incidence of cardiac tamponade (RR 2.19, 95% CI: [1.11-4.32], P = .02). LVP demonstrated shorter hospital stays (MD = 1.34 d, 95% CI: [0.90, 1.78], P < .001) and reduced procedure duration (MD = 7.75 min, 95% CI: [5.08, 10.41], P < .00001) compared to RVP. New pacemaker implantation was higher in the RVP group (RR 2.23, 95% CI: [1.14, 4.39], P = .02). CONCLUSION LVP during TAVR and BAV emerges a safer alternative to RVP, offering reduced mortality, hospital stays, and procedure durations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohammed Ayyad
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine
| | - Maram Albandak
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine
| | - Alaa Ayyad
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine
| | | | - Ahmed K Awad
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gibson MG, Guzman-Reyes S, Obanor OO. High-Degree Heart Block During Noncardiac Surgery Soon After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Case Report. A A Pract 2024; 18:e01795. [PMID: 38836558 DOI: 10.1213/xaa.0000000000001795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as a bridge to noncardiac surgery have improved outcomes. Older clinical trials concluded no increased risk of performing noncardiac surgery within 30 days of the TAVR procedure. Emerging evidence suggests patients with preexisting conduction abnormalities may require additional intervention to proceed safely with noncardiac surgery. More data are needed to clarify this clinical situation, especially for the anesthesiologist whose job is to mitigate risk for these patients. We present a patient who received a TAVR and suffered associated complications during subsequent surgery. We further discuss preventative measures and perioperative considerations for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miles G Gibson
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zou Q, Wei Z, Sun S. Complications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comprehensive analysis and management strategies. Curr Probl Cardiol 2024; 49:102478. [PMID: 38437930 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) marks a significant advancement in treating aortic stenosis (AS), especially for patients with high surgical risks. This concise review outlines TAVR's development, its broader application to include lower-risk patients, and innovations in the device and procedural technology. Clinical trials, notably the PARTNER series, affirm TAVR's efficacy, showing it matches or surpasses surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in mortality reduction, hemodynamic benefits, and symptom alleviation, including heart failure. However, TAVR entails complications such as paravalvular leakage (PVL), conduction disorders, and increased cerebrovascular event risks. We evaluate these issues, their prevalence, causative factors, and clinical consequences, emphasizing improvements in valve design and technique that have significantly lowered PVL rates. The role of aortic valve anatomy and calcification in PVL and conduction issues is analyzed, underlining the necessity for meticulous patient selection and procedural planning. Further, the review delves into cerebrovascular event risks, their origins, and preventative strategies, including cerebral protection devices and the judicious use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies. TAVR presents a less invasive, promising alternative to SAVR, but requires careful complication management to optimize patient results. Ongoing innovation and research are vital for advancing TAVR's techniques, improving valve designs, and extending its reach, thereby enhancing AS patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Zou
- Department of Cardiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zhiliang Wei
- Department of Cardiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shougang Sun
- Department of Cardiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saito T, Inohara T, Tsuruta H, Yashima F, Shimizu H, Fukuda K, Ohno Y, Nishina H, Izumo M, Asami M, Naganuma T, Mizutani K, Yamawaki M, Tada N, Yamanaka F, Shirai S, Noguchi M, Ueno H, Takagi K, Watanabe Y, Yamamoto M, Hayashida K. Pre-Existing Left Bundle Branch Block and Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC. ASIA 2024; 4:306-319. [PMID: 38660100 PMCID: PMC11035950 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Background Few reports on pre-existing left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are currently available. Further, no present studies compare patients with new onset LBBB with those with pre-existing LBBB. Objectives This study aimed to investigate the association between pre-existing or new onset LBBB and clinical outcomes after TAVR. Methods Using data from the Japanese multicenter registry, 5,996 patients who underwent TAVR between October 2013 and December 2019 were included. Patients were classified into 3 groups: no LBBB, pre-existing LBBB, and new onset LBBB. The 2-year clinical outcomes were compared between 3 groups using Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score analysis to adjust the differences in baseline characteristics. Results Of 5,996 patients who underwent TAVR, 280 (4.6%) had pre-existing LBBB, while 1,658 (27.6%) experienced new onset LBBB. Compared with the no LBBB group, multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that pre-existing LBBB was associated not only with a higher 2-year all-cause (adjusted HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.06-1.82; P = 0.015) and cardiovascular (adjusted HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.04-2.48; P = 0.031) mortality, but also with higher all-cause (adjusted HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.07-1.91; P = 0.016) and cardiovascular (adjusted HR: 1.81, 95% CI:1.12-2.93; P = 0.014) mortality than the new onset LBBB group. Heart failure was the most common cause of cardiovascular death, with more heart failure deaths in the pre-existing LBBB group. Conclusions Pre-existing LBBB was independently associated with poor clinical outcomes, reflecting an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality after TAVR. Patients with pre-existing LBBB should be carefully monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Saito
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taku Inohara
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hikaru Tsuruta
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Yashima
- Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shimizu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichi Fukuda
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yohei Ohno
- Department of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Nishina
- Department of Cardiology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masaki Izumo
- Department of Cardiology, St. Marianna University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiko Asami
- Division of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Naganuma
- Department of Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Japan
| | | | - Masahiro Yamawaki
- Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Yokohama-City Eastern Hospital, Tsurumi, Japan
| | - Norio Tada
- Department of Cardiology, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Futoshi Yamanaka
- Department of Cardiology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
| | - Shinichi Shirai
- Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kokura, Japan
| | - Masahiko Noguchi
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ueno
- Department of Cardiology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Takagi
- Department of Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yusuke Watanabe
- Department of Cardiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masanori Yamamoto
- Department of Cardiology, Toyohashi Heart Center, Toyohashi, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya Heart Center, Nagoya, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kentaro Hayashida
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - the OCEAN-TAVI Investigators
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, St. Marianna University, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Yokohama-City Eastern Hospital, Tsurumi, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kokura, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center, Urayasu, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Toyohashi Heart Center, Toyohashi, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya Heart Center, Nagoya, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parekh J, Sharma V, Robl J, Kshetri R, Osnard M, Vutthikraivit W, Arustamyan M, Deshmukh A, Rossen J, Horwitz PA, Panaich S. Temporary-Permanent Pacemakers in the Management of Conduction Abnormalities in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY & INTERVENTIONS 2024; 3:101310. [PMID: 39130177 PMCID: PMC11308022 DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Background Injury to the cardiac conduction system requiring a permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a known adverse outcome of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Temporary-permanent pacemakers (TPPM) have been used as a bridge to PPM implantation in patients with systemic infection; however, there are only a few reports of its routine use in patients undergoing TAVR. This study aimed to assess the utility of routine use of TPPM in patients undergoing TAVR with a high risk of needing a PPM or those who develop high-grade conduction abnormalities during/after TAVR. Methods Between April 2015 and December 2021, 978 patients underwent TAVR at our institution, of whom 111 patients had TPPM placed before or during/after TAVR during the study period. In total, 89 patients were included in the final analysis. Results The median age was 78 years (IQR, 71-84 years); 52 (58.4%) patients with preexisting native conduction disease were considered high risk for advanced heart block and had TPPM placed before TAVR. In addition, 37 (41.6%) patients had TPPM placed during/after TAVR. Of the 89 patients who received TPPM, 51 (57.3%) were treated with a balloon-expandable valve and 38 (42.7%) with a self-expandable valve. Of the patients who underwent TPPM placement, only 49 (55.1%) required a PPM, and TPPM was removed in 40 (44.9%) patients. TPPM was in place for a median of 6 days (IQR, 2-11 days). Only 1 of the 89 patients (1.1%) who received a TPPM had lead dislodgment. No other complications were noted. Median length of stay was 3 days (IQR, 2-4 days). Conclusions In patients with high-risk baseline conduction abnormalities before TAVR and those who develop new high-grade conduction abnormalities during/after TAVR, TPPM provides a feasible and safe method for pacing that could allow early ambulation, facilitate early discharge, and prevent unnecessary PPM implantations in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jai Parekh
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Vikram Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Jared Robl
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Rupesh Kshetri
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Michael Osnard
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Wasawat Vutthikraivit
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Michael Arustamyan
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Abhishek Deshmukh
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - James Rossen
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Phillip A. Horwitz
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Sidakpal Panaich
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Disease, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
- Swedish Heart and Vascular Institute, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sugiyama Y, Miyashita H, Yokoyama H, Ochiai T, Shishido K, Jalanko M, Yamanaka F, Vähäsilta T, Saito S, Laine M, Moriyama N. Risk Assessment of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Preexisting Right Bundle Branch Block. Am J Cardiol 2024; 213:151-160. [PMID: 38103766 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Preexisting right bundle branch block (RBBB) is the strongest predictor for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, the risk assessment for new PPI and effective procedural strategy for preventing new PPI in patients with preexisting RBBB are still unclear. This study stratified the new PPI risk after TAVI and investigated the impact of implantation strategy in a preexisting RBBB cohort. We analyzed 237 patients with preexisting RBBB who underwent TAVI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of new PPI. Multivariate analyses investigating predictors for new PPI were performed. The overall PPI rate was 33.3%. Significant baseline predictors for new PPI were combination of RBBB, left anterior or posterior fascicular block, and first-degree atrioventricular block (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 5.04), high calcium volume of noncoronary cusp (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.05 to 4.10), and membranous septum (MS) length <2 mm (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.75) in the univariate analysis and MS length <2 mm (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.82) in the multivariate analysis. On the multivariate analysis including procedural variables, predilatation (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.01 to 5.83), self-expanding valves (Corevalve, Evolut R, and Evolut Pro/Pro+; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) or mechanical expanding valves (Lotus/Lotus Edge; Boston Scientifics, Marlborough, Massachusetts) (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.31 to 6.91), and implantation depth > MS length (OR 4.27, 95% CI 1.81 to 10.08) were significantly associated with new PPI. The incidence of new PPI increased according to the number of baseline predictors (0: 20.9%, 1: 34.3%, and ≥2: 52.0%) and procedural predictors (0: 3.7%, 1: 20.9%, 2: 40.5%, and 3: 60.0%). New PPI risk in a preexisting RBBB subset could be stratified by baseline factors. Device selection and implantation strategy considering MS length could prevent new PPI even in these high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi Sugiyama
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan; Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hirokazu Miyashita
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan.
| | - Hiroaki Yokoyama
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ochiai
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| | - Koki Shishido
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| | - Mikko Jalanko
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Futoshi Yamanaka
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| | - Tommi Vähäsilta
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Shigeru Saito
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| | - Mika Laine
- Department of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Noriaki Moriyama
- Department of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rao K, Chan B, Baer A, Hansen P, Bhindi R. A Systematic Review of Delayed High-Grade Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. CJC Open 2024; 6:86-95. [PMID: 38585677 PMCID: PMC10994975 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background High-grade atrioventricular block (HGAVB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), often necessitating permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Delayed HGAVB has varying definitions but typically refers to onset 48 hours after TAVI or following discharge and may cause syncope and sudden cardiac death. This review estimates the incidence of delayed HGAVB and identifies limitations of current literature. Methods A systematic review was performed of the following online databases: Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies that labelled the outcome of "delayed" or "late" atrioventricular block after TAVI were included; patients with previous PPM or aortic valve surgery were excluded. Initial search yielded 775 studies, which, after screening, was narrowed to 19 studies. Results Nineteen studies with 14,898 patients were included. Mean age was 81.7 years, and 46.3% were male. Mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 5.6%, and 31.3% of patients had known atrial fibrillation. The most common access site was transfemoral (84.8%), whereas balloon-expandable valves were used in 62.1%, self-expanding valves in 34.0%, and mechanically expanding valves in 3.9% of cases. The incidence of delayed HGAVB ranged from 1.7% to 14.6%, with significant methodologic heterogeneity noted among the included studies. Conclusions Delayed HGAVB is a common and potentially serious complication of TAVI, with similar risk factors to acute HGAVB. With a move toward an early discharge strategy post-TAVI, further prospective study of delayed HGAVB is warranted to improve understanding of predisposing factors, incidence, timing, and implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karan Rao
- Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, North Shore Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bernard Chan
- Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexandra Baer
- Department of Cardiology, North Shore Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter Hansen
- Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, North Shore Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ravinay Bhindi
- Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, North Shore Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Damas F, Nguyen Trung ML, Postolache A, Petitjean H, Lempereur M, Viva T, Oury C, Dulgheru R, Lancellotti P. Cardiac Damage and Conduction Disorders after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. J Clin Med 2024; 13:409. [PMID: 38256543 PMCID: PMC10816504 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Recently, a staging system using 4 grades has been proposed to quantify the extent of cardiac damage associated with aortic stenosis (AS), namely AS-related cardiac damage staging (ASCDS). ASCDS is independently associated with all-cause mortality and important clinical outcomes. To evaluate whether it might be associated with the occurrence of conduction system disorders after TAVI, a total of 119 symptomatic patients with severe AS who underwent a TAVI were categorized according to ASCDS: group 1 (13.5%): no or LV damage; group 2 (58.8%): left atrial/mitral valve damage, atrial fibrillation (AF); group 3 (27.7%): low-flow state, pulmonary vasculature/tricuspid valve/RV damage. After TAVI, 34% of patients exhibited LBBB and 10% high-degree atrioventricular block (HD-AVB). No patient in group 1 developed HD-AVB whereas new LBBB was frequent in groups 2 and 3. Twenty-one patients presented with paroxysmal AF with a higher rate for each group increment (group 1: n = 0, 0%; group 2: n = 11, 15.7%; group 3: n = 10, 30.3%) (p = 0.012). Patients in group 3 had the higher rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) (group 1: n = 1, 6.3%; group 2: n = 7, 10%; group 3: n = 9, 27.3%) (p = 0.012). In conclusion, ASCDS might help identify patients at higher risk of conduction disorders and PPMI requirement after TAVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Damas
- Department of Cardiology, CHU Sart Tilman, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences Liège, University of Liège Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (F.D.); (M.-L.N.T.); (A.P.); (H.P.); (M.L.); (T.V.); (C.O.); (R.D.)
| | - Mai-Linh Nguyen Trung
- Department of Cardiology, CHU Sart Tilman, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences Liège, University of Liège Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (F.D.); (M.-L.N.T.); (A.P.); (H.P.); (M.L.); (T.V.); (C.O.); (R.D.)
| | - Adriana Postolache
- Department of Cardiology, CHU Sart Tilman, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences Liège, University of Liège Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (F.D.); (M.-L.N.T.); (A.P.); (H.P.); (M.L.); (T.V.); (C.O.); (R.D.)
| | - Hélène Petitjean
- Department of Cardiology, CHU Sart Tilman, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences Liège, University of Liège Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (F.D.); (M.-L.N.T.); (A.P.); (H.P.); (M.L.); (T.V.); (C.O.); (R.D.)
| | - Mathieu Lempereur
- Department of Cardiology, CHU Sart Tilman, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences Liège, University of Liège Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (F.D.); (M.-L.N.T.); (A.P.); (H.P.); (M.L.); (T.V.); (C.O.); (R.D.)
| | - Tommaso Viva
- Department of Cardiology, CHU Sart Tilman, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences Liège, University of Liège Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (F.D.); (M.-L.N.T.); (A.P.); (H.P.); (M.L.); (T.V.); (C.O.); (R.D.)
- Department of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Galeazzi, Sant’Ambrogio Hospital, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Cécile Oury
- Department of Cardiology, CHU Sart Tilman, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences Liège, University of Liège Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (F.D.); (M.-L.N.T.); (A.P.); (H.P.); (M.L.); (T.V.); (C.O.); (R.D.)
| | - Raluca Dulgheru
- Department of Cardiology, CHU Sart Tilman, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences Liège, University of Liège Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (F.D.); (M.-L.N.T.); (A.P.); (H.P.); (M.L.); (T.V.); (C.O.); (R.D.)
| | - Patrizio Lancellotti
- Department of Cardiology, CHU Sart Tilman, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences Liège, University of Liège Hospital, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (F.D.); (M.-L.N.T.); (A.P.); (H.P.); (M.L.); (T.V.); (C.O.); (R.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Perel N, Tovia-Brodie O, Schnur A, Acha MR, Levi N, Cohen Y, Dvir D, Glikson M, Michowitz Y. Post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation isolated PR prolongation: incidence and clinical significance. Europace 2023; 26:euae011. [PMID: 38225168 PMCID: PMC10808043 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Conduction abnormalities post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are common. Post-TAVI PR prolongation was mainly studied as an adjunct to new-onset bundle branch block. The net effect of isolated PR prolongation (IPRP) without post-TAVI QRS changes is not well known. The aim of this study was to define the incidence and clinical significance of post-TAVI IPRP. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 1108 consecutive TAVI patients were reviewed. Patients with IPRP were compared with patients without post-TAVI electrocardiogram (ECG) changes. Clinical outcomes included permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and overall mortality. A total of 146 patients with IPRP were compared with 290 patients without post-TAVI ECG changes. At 1 year follow-up, 4 (2.7%) and 7 (2.4%) patients underwent PPI (P = 0.838) and 10 (6.8%) and 25 (8.6%) died (P = 0.521), from the study and control groups, respectively. No patient with IPRP and narrow QRS underwent PPI during 1 year post-TAVI, and all death events were non-cardiac except one unknown cause. Permanent pacemaker implantation rates among patients with IPRP and wide QRS were higher (n = 4, 12.1%), compared with patients with wide QRS without post-TAVI ECG change (n = 3, 4%) however not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.126). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that in patients with narrow QRS, neither PR prolongation nor baseline or maximal PR intervals was associated with the combined endpoint of PPI and mortality. However, in patients with wide QRS, baseline PR intervals and QRS width, but not PR prolongation were associated with the combined outcome. CONCLUSION Post-TAVI IPRP in patients with narrow QRS is not associated with adverse outcome. This finding may translate clinically into a more permissive approach to these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nimrod Perel
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Shmuel Beit Street, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Oholi Tovia-Brodie
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Shmuel Beit Street, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Asher Schnur
- Department of Internal Medicine C, Shaare Zedek Medical Center,12 Shmuel Beit Street, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Moshe Rav Acha
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Shmuel Beit Street, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nir Levi
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Shmuel Beit Street, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yogev Cohen
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Danny Dvir
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Shmuel Beit Street, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Michael Glikson
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Shmuel Beit Street, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yoav Michowitz
- Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Shmuel Beit Street, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Blusztein D, Raney A, Walsh J, Nazif T, Woods C, Daniels D. Best Practices in Left Ventricular Pacing for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. STRUCTURAL HEART : THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM 2023; 7:100213. [PMID: 38046859 PMCID: PMC10692352 DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is continually evolving, with a recent emphasis on a "minimalist" approach toward reducing procedural invasiveness, duration, and recovery time. Whereas a better understanding of the relationship between TAVR and new conduction disturbances has led to improved periprocedural management, intraprocedural rapid-pacing techniques have not evolved beyond traditional right ventricular temporary pacing. An alternative strategy utilizing the left ventricular guidewire for rapid pacing has been developed with evidence supporting its safety, effectiveness, and potential reductions in procedure time and cost. This review will outline the current best practices in left ventricular pacing for TAVR, a practical technique that embraces the minimalist approach to TAVR and may be considered for routine use. It aims to explore the current evidence and combine this with expert opinion to offer a strategy for temporary pacing that encourages efficiencies for physicians and patients without compromising periprocedural safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Blusztein
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aidan Raney
- Division of Cardiology, St. Joseph Hospital, Orange, California, USA
| | - Joe Walsh
- Division of Cardiology, St. Alphonsus Health System, Boise, Idaho, USA
| | - Tamim Nazif
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christopher Woods
- Division of Cardiology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David Daniels
- Division of Cardiology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lemarchand L, Boulmier D, Leurent G, Bedossa M, Sharobeem S, Bakhti A, Le Breton H, Auffret V. Conductive disturbances in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation setting: An appraisal of current knowledge and unmet needs. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2023; 116:419-425. [PMID: 37328391 DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
New-onset conduction disturbances, including left bundle branch block and permanent pacemaker implantation, remain a major issue after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Preprocedural risk assessment in current practice is most often limited to evaluation of the baseline electrocardiogram, whereas it may benefit from a multimodal approach, including ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring and multidetector computed tomography. Physicians may encounter equivocal situations during the hospital phase, and the management of follow-up is not fully defined, despite the publication of several expert consensuses and the inclusion of recommendations regarding the role of electrophysiology studies and postprocedural monitoring in recent guidelines. This review provides an overview of current knowledge and future perspectives regarding the management of new-onset conduction disturbances in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, from the preprocedural phase to long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Léo Lemarchand
- Service de cardiologie, CHU de Rennes, université de Rennes 1, Inserm LTSI U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Dominique Boulmier
- Service de cardiologie, CHU de Rennes, université de Rennes 1, Inserm LTSI U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Guillaume Leurent
- Service de cardiologie, CHU de Rennes, université de Rennes 1, Inserm LTSI U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Marc Bedossa
- Service de cardiologie, CHU de Rennes, université de Rennes 1, Inserm LTSI U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Sam Sharobeem
- Service de cardiologie, CHU de Rennes, université de Rennes 1, Inserm LTSI U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Abdelkader Bakhti
- Service de cardiologie, CHU de Rennes, université de Rennes 1, Inserm LTSI U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Hervé Le Breton
- Service de cardiologie, CHU de Rennes, université de Rennes 1, Inserm LTSI U1099, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Vincent Auffret
- Service de cardiologie, CHU de Rennes, université de Rennes 1, Inserm LTSI U1099, 35000 Rennes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Drakopoulou M, Oikonomou G, Apostolos A, Karmpalioti M, Simopoulou C, Koliastasis L, Latsios G, Synetos A, Benetos G, Trantalis G, Sideris S, Dilaveris P, Tsioufis C, Toutouzas K. The Role of ECG Strain Pattern in Prognosis after TAVI: A Sub-Analysis of the DIRECT Trial. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1234. [PMID: 37374017 DOI: 10.3390/life13061234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of an electrocardiographic (ECG) strain pattern-among other ECG features-has been shown to be predictive of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. However, data evaluating its impact on symptomatic patients undergoing TAVI are scarce. Therefore, we tried to investigate the prognostic impact of baseline ECG strain pattern on clinical outcomes after TAVI. METHODS A sub-group of patients of the randomized DIRECT (Pre-dilatation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Trial) trial with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI with a self-expanding valve in one single center were consecutively enrolled. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the presence of ECG strain. Left ventricular strain was defined as the presence of ≥1 mm convex ST-segment depression with asymmetrical T-wave inversion in leads V5 to V6 on the baseline 12-lead ECG. Patients were excluded if they had paced rhythm or left bundle branch block at baseline. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were generated to assess the impact on outcomes. The primary clinical endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year after TAVI. RESULTS Of the 119 patients screened, 5 patients were excluded due to left bundle branch block. Among the 114 included patients (mean age: 80.8 ± 7), 37 patients (32.5%) had strain pattern on pre-TAVI ECG, while 77 patients (67.5%) did not exhibit an ECG strain pattern. No differences in baseline characteristics were found between the two groups. At 1 year, seven patients reached the primary clinical endpoint, with patients in the strain group demonstrating significantly higher mortality in Kaplan-Meier plots compared to patients without left ventricular strain (five vs. two, log-rank p = 0.022). There was no difference between the strain and no strain group regarding the performance of pre-dilatation (21 vs. 33, chi-square p = 0.164). In the multivariate analysis, left ventricular strain was found to be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality after TAVI [Exp(B): 12.2, 95% Confidence Intervals (CI): 1.4-101.9]. CONCLUSION Left ventricular ECG strain is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality after TAVI. Thus, baseline ECG characteristics may aid in risk-stratifying patients scheduled for TAVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Drakopoulou
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Oikonomou
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasios Apostolos
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Karmpalioti
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Chryssa Simopoulou
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Leonidas Koliastasis
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - George Latsios
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Andreas Synetos
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Benetos
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - George Trantalis
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
- State Department of Cardiology, Hippokration General Hospital, 11256 Athens, Greece
| | - Skevos Sideris
- State Department of Cardiology, Hippokration General Hospital, 11256 Athens, Greece
| | - Polychronis Dilaveris
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Costas Tsioufis
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Toutouzas
- First Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gilchrist JH, Dangl MD, Grant JK, Albosta M, Vincent LT, Ebner BF, Maning J, Colombo RA. Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Baseline Right Bundle Branch Block Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am J Cardiol 2023; 188:1-6. [PMID: 36446226 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to explore contemporary in-hospital outcomes and trends of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcomes in patients with baseline right bundle branch block (RBBB) using data collected from a nationwide sample. Using the National Inpatient Sample, we identified patients hospitalized for an index TAVI procedure from 2016 to 2019. Primary outcomes included in-hospital all-cause mortality, complete heart block, and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. A total of 199,895 hospitalizations for TAVI were identified. RBBB was present in 10,495 cases (5.3%). Patients with RBBB were older (median age 81 vs 80 years, p <0.001) and less likely to be female (35% vs 47.4%, p <0.001). After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics and elective versus nonelective admission, patients with RBBB had a higher incidence of complete heart block (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.77, confidence interval [CI] 4.55 to 5.01, p <0.001) and PPM implantation (aOR 4.15, CI 3.95 to 4.35, p <0.001) and no difference in-hospital mortality rate (aOR 0.85, CI 0.69 to 1.05, p = 0.137). Between 2016 and 2019, there was a 3.5% and 2.9% decrease in in-hospital PPM implantation in patients with and without RBBB, respectively. In conclusion, from 2016 to 2019, the rate of in-hospital PPM implantation decreased during index TAVI hospitalization in both patients with and without RBBB. However, in those with baseline RBBB, complete heart block complication rates requiring PPM implantation remain relatively high. Further research and advances are needed to continue to reduce complication rates and the need for PPM implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael D Dangl
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida
| | - Jelani K Grant
- Department of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael Albosta
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida
| | - Louis T Vincent
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida
| | - Bertrand F Ebner
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida
| | - Jennifer Maning
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rosario A Colombo
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pozetti AH, Ribeiro HB. Conduction Disturbances Associated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Challenge for another 20 Years? Arq Bras Cardiol 2022; 119:531-532. [PMID: 36287408 PMCID: PMC9563871 DOI: 10.36660/abc.20220619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Hélio Pozetti
- Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo , SP - Brasil
| | - Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro
- Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo , SP - Brasil.,Hospital Samaritano Paulista , São Paulo , SP - Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pinnacchio G, Ruscio E, Rocco E, Trani C, Burzotta F, Aurigemma C, Romagnoli E, Scacciavillani R, Narducci ML, Bencardino G, Perna F, Spera FR, Comerci G, Bisignani A, Pelargonio G. Short-Term Atrioventricular Dysfunction Recovery after Post-TAVI Pacemaker Implantation. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2022; 9:jcdd9100324. [PMID: 36286276 PMCID: PMC9604573 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9100324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) represents a frequent complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to atrio-ventricular (AV) node injury. Predictors of early AV function recovery were investigated. We analyzed 50 consecutive patients (82 ± 6 years, 58% males, EuroSCORE: 7.8 ± 3.3%, STS mortality score: 5 ± 2.8%). Pacemaker interrogations within 4−6 weeks from PPI were performed to collect data on AV conduction. The most common indication of PPI was persistent third-degree (44%)/high-degree (20%) AV block/atrial fibrillation (AF) with slow ventricular conduction (16%) after TAVI. At follow-up, 13 patients (26%) recovered AV conduction (i.e., sinus rhythm with stable 1:1 AV conduction/AF with a mean ventricular response >50 bpm, associated with a long-term ventricular pacing percentage < 5%). At multivariate analysis, complete atrio-ventricular block independently predicted pacemaker dependency at follow-up (p = 0.019). Patients with persistent AV dysfunction showed a significant AV conduction time prolongation after TAVI (PR interval from 207 ± 50 to 230 ± 51, p = 0.02; QRS interval from 124 ± 23 to 147 ± 16, p < 0.01) compared to patients with recovery, in whom AV conduction parameters remained unchanged. Several patients receiving PPI after TAVI have recovery of AV conduction within a few weeks. Longer observation periods prior to PPI might be justified, and algorithms to minimize ventricular pacing should be utilized whenever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Pinnacchio
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Eleonora Ruscio
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Erica Rocco
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Trani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Cardiology Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Burzotta
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Cardiology Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Aurigemma
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Romagnoli
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Scacciavillani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Lucia Narducci
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Bencardino
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Perna
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Raffaele Spera
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Comerci
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Bisignani
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gemma Pelargonio
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Cardiology Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
(Permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing TAVR - single center study between years 2009 and 2021). COR ET VASA 2022. [DOI: 10.33678/cor.2022.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
17
|
Zahid S, Khan MZ, Ullah W, Tanveer Ud Din M, Abbas S, Ubaid A, Khan MU, Rai D, Baibhav B, Rao M, Singla A, Goldsweig AM, Depta JP, Balla S. In-hospital outcomes of TAVR patients with a bundle branch block: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample 2011-2018. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 100:424-436. [PMID: 35842779 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Data on the outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with a bundle branch block (BBB) remains limited. METHODS We studied the outcomes of TAVR patients with a BBB from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2011 and 2018 using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2018, 194,237 patients underwent TAVR, where 1.7% (n = 3,232) had a right BBB (RBBB) and 13.7% (n = 26,689) had a left BBB (LBBB). Patients with a RBBB and LBBB had a higher rate of new permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation (31.5% - RBBB, 15.7% LBBB vs. 10.2% - no BBB). RBBB was associated with a significantly longer median length of stay (5 days) and total hospitalization cost ($53,669) compared with LBBB (3 days and $47,552) and no BBB (3 days and $47,171). Trend analysis revealed lower rates of PPM implantation and reduced lengths of stay and costs across all comparison groups. CONCLUSION In conclusion, patients undergoing TAVR with a BBB are associated with higher new rates of PPM implantation. RBBB is the strongest independent predictor for new PPM implantation following TAVR. Rates of new PPM implantation in TAVR patients with and without a BBB have improved over time including reductions in length of stay and hospital costs. Further study is needed to reduce the risks of PPM implantation in TAVR patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salman Zahid
- Sands-Constellation Heart Institute, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Muhammad Z Khan
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Waqas Ullah
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mian Tanveer Ud Din
- Department of Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sakina Abbas
- Department of Medicine, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Aamer Ubaid
- Department of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas city, Missouri, USA
| | - Muhammad U Khan
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Devesh Rai
- Sands-Constellation Heart Institute, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Bipul Baibhav
- Sands-Constellation Heart Institute, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Mohan Rao
- Sands-Constellation Heart Institute, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Atul Singla
- Division of Cardiology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Andrew M Goldsweig
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Jeremiah P Depta
- Sands-Constellation Heart Institute, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Sudarshan Balla
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, West Virginia University Heart & Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Temporary permanent pacers for RBBB undergoing TAVR: Could this be a solution? CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2022; 42:26-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.06.266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
19
|
Shrestha B, DeBoer R, Poudel B, Gyawali P, Donato A. Impact of Pre-Existing Right Bundle Branch Block on In-Hospital Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insight from National Inpatient Sample Database, 2016-2019. Curr Probl Cardiol 2022; 47:101298. [PMID: 35753400 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is a common finding in older adults and may have higher complications following the transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure. METHODS The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for all hospitalizations undergoing percutaneous TAVR from 2016 to 2019. Cohorts with RBBB were compared to hospitalized patients without RBBB. Weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between RBBB and in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS Out of 203,900 procedures performed, 5.05% had RBBB, and 94.95% didn't have RBBB. The primary outcome of in-hospital mortality was not statistically different between patients with and without RBBB (0.92% vs. 1.41%, OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.41-1.03, p=0.07), a finding that did not change when adjusted for comorbidities in multivariate analysis (adjusted OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.41-1.05, p=0.08). In the RBBB group, total complication rates were higher (adjusted OR: 3.67, 95% CI: 3.32-4.06, p<0.001), driven primarily by pacemaker implantation (adjusted OR: 4.18, 95% CI: 3.77-4.63, p<0.001). We also found higher cardiac arrest (adjusted OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.08-23.99, p=0.001) and post-procedural heart failure (adjusted OR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.07-7.08, p=0.036). CONCLUSION Patients with a history of RBBB who undergo TAVR have an increased need for permanent pacemaker implantation compared to those without a right bundle branch block. Whether extended monitoring post TAVR would reduce complications is a matter of further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biraj Shrestha
- Department of Medicine, Tower Health System, West Reading, PA, United States of America.
| | - Rebecca DeBoer
- Department of Medicine, Tower Health System, West Reading, PA, United States of America
| | - Bidhya Poudel
- Department of Medicine, AMITA Health Saint Francis Hospital, Evanston, IL, United States of America
| | | | - Anthony Donato
- Department of Medicine, Tower Health System, West Reading, PA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Natarajan MK, Sheth TN, Wijeysundera HC, Chavarria J, Rodes-Cabau J, Velianou JL, Radhakrishnan S, Newman T, Smith A, Wong JA, Schwalm JD, Duong M, Mian RI, Bishop MG, Healey JS. Remote ECG monitoring to reduce complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantations: the Redirect TAVI study. Europace 2022; 24:1475-1483. [PMID: 35699482 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The optimal strategy of monitoring for conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is uncertain. We evaluated a pre- and post-TAVI remote ambulatory cardiac monitoring (rACM) strategy for identification of conduction disturbances and to reduce unplanned pre-discharge post-TAVI permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI). METHODS AND RESULTS REdireCT TAVI (NCT0381820) was a prospective cohort study of patients referred for outpatient TAVI. Patients with prior PPMI were excluded. Remote ambulatory cardiac monitoring consisted of 2 weeks of continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring (Pocket-ECGTM) both before and after TAVI. Compliance to monitoring, frequency of notifications, unplanned PPMI post-TAVI, and length of hospitalization were measured. Between June 2018 and March 2020, in 192 undergoing TAVI (mean age: 81.8 years; female sex 46%; balloon-expandable valve 95.3%), compliance to rACM was 91.7% pre-TAVI (mean duration: 12.8 days), and 87.5% post-TAVI (mean duration: 12.9 days). There were 24 (12.5%) rACM notifications (13 pre-TAVI; 11 post-TAVI) resulting in 14 (7.3%) planned PPMI: seven pre-TAVI [due to sinus pauses n = 2 or atrio-ventricular block (AVB) n = 5] and seven post-TAVI [due to sinus pauses n = 1 or AVB n = 5 or ventricular tachycardia (VT) n = 1]. In addition, nine (4.7%) patients received pre-TAVI PPMI due to high-risk baseline ECG (right bundle branch block with hemi-block or prolonged PR interval). Unplanned PPMI post-TAVI during index hospitalization occurred in six (3.1%) patients due to AVB and in one patient readmitted with AVB. The median length of stay post-TAVI was 1 day. CONCLUSION A strategy of routine rACM was feasible and frequently led to PPMI. Our approach of 2-week rACM both pre- and post-TAVI achieves both high patient compliance and sufficient surveillance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03810820.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhu Kailash Natarajan
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| | - Tej Narendra Sheth
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| | - Harindra Channa Wijeysundera
- Schulich Heart Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, ICES Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jorge Chavarria
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| | - Josep Rodes-Cabau
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - James Louis Velianou
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| | - Sam Radhakrishnan
- Schulich Heart Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, ICES Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Toni Newman
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| | - Amanda Smith
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| | - Jorge Alfredo Wong
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| | - Jon-David Schwalm
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| | - Monica Duong
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| | - Rajibul Islam Mian
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| | - Marsella Giuliana Bishop
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| | - Jeffrey Sean Healey
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Room 508 - McMaster Clinic, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Vilalta V, Cediel G, Mohammadi S, López H, Kalavrouziotis D, Resta H, Dumont E, Voisine P, Philippon F, Escabia C, Borrellas A, Alperi A, Bayes-Genis A, Rodes-Cabau J. Incidence, Predictors and Prognostic Value of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Sutureless Valve Implantation in Low-Risk Aortic Stenosis Patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 62:6593489. [PMID: 35639725 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES SU-SAVR has been associated with higher rates of permanent pacemaker (PPM) compared with conventionally implanted aortic bioprostheses. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, predictors and mid-term prognostic impact of PPM after Perceval (Livanova, London, UK) SU-SAVR in low-risk patients. METHODS A total of 400 consecutive low-risk (EuroSCORE II < 4%) patients without prior pacemaker who underwent SAVR with the Perceval prosthesis from 2013 to 2019 in two centres were included. Baseline, clinical and electrocardiographic parameters, procedural characteristics, and follow-up data were collected. RESULTS PPM was required in 36 (9%) patients after SU-SAVR, with a median time between the procedure and PPM implantation of 7.5 (4.5-10.5) days. Older age and prior right bundle branch block (RBBB) were associated with an increased risk of PPM (p < 0.05 for all), but only baseline RBBB was found to be an independent predictor of new PPM requirement (Odds ratio: 2.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-5.81; p = 0.022). At a median follow-up of 3.4 (2.3-4.5) years, there were no differences between groups in mortality (PPM: 36%, no PPM: 22%, p = 0.105) or heart failure rehospitalization (PPM: 25%, no PPM: 21%, p = 0.839). CONCLUSIONS About 1 out of 10 low-risk patients with aortic stenosis undergoing SU-SAVR with the Perceval prosthesis required PPM implantation. Prior RBBB determined an increased risk (close to 3 times) of PPM following the procedure. PPM was not associated with a higher risk of clinical events at 3-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Vilalta
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,CIBER Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Germán Cediel
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,CIBER Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Siamak Mohammadi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Helena López
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,CIBER Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Helena Resta
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,CIBER Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Eric Dumont
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Pierre Voisine
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | - François Philippon
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Claudia Escabia
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,CIBER Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Borrellas
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,CIBER Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Alperi
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Antoni Bayes-Genis
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,CIBER Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Rodes-Cabau
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Translation of the document prepared by the Czech Society of Cardiology. COR ET VASA 2022. [DOI: 10.33678/cor.2022.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
23
|
Wang J, Liu S, Han X, Chen Y, Chen H, Wan Z, Song B. Prognostic Outcome of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:842929. [PMID: 35463780 PMCID: PMC9024042 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.842929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundLeft bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common complication of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and its impact on prognosis is controversial.MethodsA comprehensive electronic search was conducted in databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and The Web of Science), from the date of database establishment till March 2021, to screen for studies on new-onset LBBB after TAVR. We next performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of new-onset LBBB after TAVR on patient prognosis, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.ResultsA total of 17 studies, including 9205 patients, were eligible for our analysis. Patients with new-onset LBBB had elevated all-cause mortality risk verses patients without new-onset LBBB, during all follow ups. The relevant data are as follows: 30-day (RR:1.71; 95%CI:1.27–2.29; P < 0.001), 1-year (RR:1.31; 95%CI:1.12–1.52; P < 0.001), and 2-year (RR:1.31; 95%CI:1.09–1.56; P = 0.003) follow ups. Likewise, new-onset LBBB patients also experienced increased cardiovascular mortality, compared to non-new-onset LBBB patients, but only in the 1-year follow up (RR:1.49; 95%CI:1.23–1.82; P < 0.001). Hospitalization for heart failure was dramatically elevated in patients with new-onset LBBB verses non-new-onset LBBB, in all follow ups. The relevant data are as follows: 30-day (RR:1.56; 95%CI:1.13–2.12; P = 0.007), 1-year (RR:1.35; 95%CI:1.08–1.68; P = 0.007), and 2-year (RR:1.49; 95%CI:1.21–1.84; P < 0.001). Similarly, new-onset LBBB patients had higher PPI risk than non-new-onset LBBB patients, in all follow ups. The relevant data are as follows: 30-day (RR:3.05; 95%CI:1.49–6.22; P = 0.002), 1-year (RR:2.15; 95%CI:1.52–3.03; P < 0.001), and 2-year (RR:2.52; 95%CI:1.68–3.78; P < 0.001).ConclusionPatients with new-onset LBBB have worse prognosis after TAVR than those without new-onset LBBB. Recognition of the adverse effects of post-TAVR new-onset LBBB can lead to the development of new strategies that enhance clinical outcomes.Systematic Trial Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=197224, identifier: 19722.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jialu Wang
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shidong Liu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiangxiang Han
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yang Chen
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hao Chen
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zunhui Wan
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Bing Song
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Bing Song
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Isogai T, Dykun I, Agrawal A, Shekhar S, Saad AM, Verma BR, Abdelfattah OM, Kalra A, Krishnaswamy A, Reed GW, Kapadia SR, Puri R. Risk Stratification and Management of Advanced Conduction Disturbances Following TAVI in Patients With Pre-Existing RBBB. STRUCTURAL HEART : THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM 2022; 6:100006. [PMID: 37273468 PMCID: PMC10236876 DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) is a strong predictor of increased need for a permanent pacemaker (PPM) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Yet, further risk stratification and management remain challenging in patients with pre-existing RBBB owing to limited data. Therefore, we sought to investigate the incidence, predictors, and management of advanced conduction disturbances after TAVI in patients with pre-existing RBBB. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 261 consecutive patients with pre-existing RBBB (median age 81 years; 28.0% female; 95.0% received a balloon-expandable valve) without a pre-existing PPM who underwent TAVI at our institution in 2015-2019. Outcomes were high-degree atrioventricular block/complete heart block (HAVB/CHB) and PPM requirement. Results Overall, the 30-day HAVB/CHB rate was 28.0%, of which 76.7% occurred during the TAVI procedure. The delayed HAVB/CHB rate was 8.3%. Implantation depth below aortic annulus (per 1-mm increase) was significantly associated with increased risk of procedural HAVB/CHB (adjusted odds ratio = 1.25, 95% confidence interval = 1.07-1.46), delayed HAVB/CHB (1.34 [1.01-1.79]), and 30-day PPM (1.32 [1.11-1.55]). Predilation was associated with delayed HAVB/CHB (4.02 [1.22-13.23]). The combination of no predilation and implantation depth of ≤2.0 mm had lower rates of procedural HAVB/CHB (11.2% vs. 26.7%-30.4%, p = 0.011), delayed HAVB/CHB (2.1% vs. 7.6%-28.1%, p < 0.001), and 30-day PPM (10.3% vs. 20.0%-43.5%, p < 0.001) than the other strategies of valve deployment. Complete HAVB/CHB recovery after PPM implantation was uncommon at 7.1%. Conclusions In patients with pre-existing RBBB, the majority of HAVB/CHB events occurred during the TAVI procedure. Avoidance of predilation coupled with high valve deployment may result in relatively low rates of procedural and delayed HAVB/CHB, along with 30-day PPM rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiaki Isogai
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Iryna Dykun
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ankit Agrawal
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Shashank Shekhar
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Anas M. Saad
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Beni Rai Verma
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Omar M. Abdelfattah
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ankur Kalra
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Amar Krishnaswamy
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Grant W. Reed
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Samir R. Kapadia
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rishi Puri
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Isogai T, Dykun I, Agrawal A, Shekhar S, Tarakji KG, Wazni OM, Kalra A, Krishnaswamy A, Reed GW, Kapadia SR, Puri R. Evaluation of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines in pre-existing right bundle branch block patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL OPEN 2022; 2:oeac014. [PMID: 35919121 PMCID: PMC9242057 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Aims The 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend early pacemaker implantation in pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) patients who develop PR prolongation or QRS axis change after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to evaluate this recommendation in TAVI recipients with a balloon-expandable valve (BEV). Methods and results We retrospectively reviewed 188 pre-existing RBBB patients without pre-existing permanent pacemaker (PPM) who underwent TAVI with a BEV at our institution in 2015–19. Patients who developed high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) during TAVI or within 24 h post-TAVI were excluded. Eligible patients were divided according to the guideline-directed criteria (ΔPR interval ≥20 ms and/or QRS axis change). Patients who met the criteria (n = 102, 54.3%), compared with those who did not (n = 86), had a higher prevalence of baseline right axis deviation and were more likely to have received a larger valve with greater oversizing. The 30-day delayed HAVB rate did not differ significantly between the groups (3.9% vs. 4.7%, P = 1.00; odds ratio = 0.84, 95% confidence interval = 0.20–3.45). There was also no significant difference in terms of death (5.0% vs. 8.4% at 1 year; overall log-rank P = 0.94) or a composite of death or PPM implantation (14.8% vs. 16.6% at 1 year; overall log-rank P = 0.94) during follow-up post-TAVI. The majority of PR prolongations (79.4%) and QRS axis changes (52.0%) regressed within the following 24 h. Conclusion The present data did not demonstrate an association of significant changes in PR interval or QRS axis with heightened delayed HAVB risk in BEV recipients with pre-existing RBBB. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiaki Isogai
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic , 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-3 , Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Iryna Dykun
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic , 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-3 , Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Duisburg-Essen , Essen, Germany
| | - Ankit Agrawal
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic , 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-3 , Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Shashank Shekhar
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic , 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-3 , Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Khaldoun G Tarakji
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic , 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-3 , Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Oussama M Wazni
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic , 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-3 , Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Ankur Kalra
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic , 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-3 , Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Amar Krishnaswamy
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic , 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-3 , Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Grant W Reed
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic , 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-3 , Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Samir R Kapadia
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic , 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-3 , Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Rishi Puri
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic , 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-3 , Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kassier A, Velagapudi P, Shrestha NM, Schuitema J, Gauri A, Frost J, Merhi W, Jovinge S, Chalfoun N. Optimizing care of patients with right bundle branch block undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2022; 42:17-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
27
|
Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabés JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJ, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CW, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Leclercq C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylén I, Tolosana JM. Grupo de trabajo sobre estimulación cardiaca y terapia de resincronización cardiaca de la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología (ESC). Rev Esp Cardiol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
28
|
Mitsis A, Eftychiou C, Christophides T, Sakellaropoulos S, Avraamides P. The conjunction conundrum in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Curr Probl Cardiol 2022; 48:101130. [PMID: 35114293 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
A continuous discussion regarding the predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is ongoing, especially in the era of low and medium risk patients. The aim of this article is to review the data so far regarding the pathophysiology, risk factors, and the indications for permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI. The factors that contribute to rhythm abnormalities post TAVI can be divided into pre-existing conduction abnormalities, patient-related anatomical factors, and peri-procedural technical factors. The latter components are potentially modifiable, and this is where attention should be directed, particularly now that in an era of TAVI expansion towards lower-risk patients.
Collapse
Key Words
- AF, Atrial fibrillation
- AS, Aortic stenosis
- AV, Atrioventricular
- BAV, Balloon aortic valvuloplasty
- BBB, Bundle branch block
- BEV, Balloon expandable valve
- CAVB, Complete Atrioventricular block
- CRT,
- CT, Computer tomography
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy
- ECG, Electrocardiogram
- EPS, Electrophysiology study
- ID, Implantation depth
- LAH, Left anterior hemiblock
- LBBB, Left bundle branch block
- LCC, Left coronary cusp
- LVEF, Left ventricular ejection function
- LVOT, Left ventricular outflow track
- LVOT- EI, Left ventricular outflow track eccentricity index
- LVOT-CA, Left ventricular outflow track calcification
- MS, Membranous septum
- NCC, Non coronary cusp
- PPI, Permanent pacemaker implantation
- PVL, Paravalvular leak
- RAO, Right anterior oblique
- RBBB, Right bundle branch block
- RCC, Right coronary cusp
- SAS, Severe aortic stenosis
- SEV, Self-expandable valve
- TAVI, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation, pacemaker implantation, LBBB, balloon expandable valves, self-expandable valves, LVOT. List of abbreviations, AMCC, Aortomitral continuity calcification
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Mitsis
- Cardiology Department, Nicosia General Hospital, 2029, Nicosia, Cyprus.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabés JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJS, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CW, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Leclercq C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylén I, Tolosana JM, Leyva F, Linde C, Abdelhamid M, Aboyans V, Arbelo E, Asteggiano R, Barón-Esquivias G, Bauersachs J, Biffi M, Birgersdotter-Green U, Bongiorni MG, Borger MA, Čelutkienė J, Cikes M, Daubert JC, Drossart I, Ellenbogen K, Elliott PM, Fabritz L, Falk V, Fauchier L, Fernández-Avilés F, Foldager D, Gadler F, De Vinuesa PGG, Gorenek B, Guerra JM, Hermann Haugaa K, Hendriks J, Kahan T, Katus HA, Konradi A, Koskinas KC, Law H, Lewis BS, Linker NJ, Løchen ML, Lumens J, Mascherbauer J, Mullens W, Nagy KV, Prescott E, Raatikainen P, Rakisheva A, Reichlin T, Ricci RP, Shlyakhto E, Sitges M, Sousa-Uva M, Sutton R, Suwalski P, Svendsen JH, Touyz RM, Van Gelder IC, Vernooy K, Waltenberger J, Whinnett Z, Witte KK. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace 2022; 24:71-164. [PMID: 34455427 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
30
|
Santos-Martinez S, Halim J, Castro-Mejía A, De Marco F, Trani C, Martin P, Infusino F, Ancona M, Moreno R, den Heijer P, Nombela-Franco L, Bedogni F, Sardella G, Montorfano M, Revilla-Orodea A, Delgado-Arana JR, Barrero A, Gómez-Salvador I, IJsselmuiden AJJ, Redondo A, Gutiérrez H, Serrador A, Serruys PW, Román JAS, Amat-Santos IJ. Myval versus alternative balloon- and self-expandable transcatheter heart valves: A central core lab analysis of conduction disturbances. Int J Cardiol 2022; 351:25-31. [PMID: 34979152 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.12.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have compared surface electrocardiographic changes following different self-expandable (SE) (Evolut (Medtronic, USA); Acurate (Boston Scientific, USA); Portico (Abbott, USA); and Allegra (NVT, Germany)) and balloon-expandable (BE) Sapien-3 (Edwards Lifesciences, USA) transcatheter heart valves. We aimed to compare these prosthesis with the novel Myval BE prosthesis (Meril Life, India). METHODS Academic European registry of consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who received any of the 6 aforementioned valves. Baseline, post-procedural, and discharge 12‑leads electrocardiograms (ECG) were centrally analyzed and compared. RESULTS A total of 1131 patients were included: 135 Myval (11.9%), 290 Sapien-3 (25.6%), 298 Evolut (26.3%), 180 Acurate (15.9%), 125 Portico (11.1%), and 103 Allegra (9.1%). There were no baseline differences in intraventricular conduction disturbances rate. Compared to the novel BE Myval, there were similar procedural and in-hospital outcomes. Similar rates of early new permanent pacemaker implant (PPI) were observed amongst Myval (7.4%), Sapien-3 (13.4%), and Acurate (9.1%), but Evolut, Portico, and Allegra presented significantly higher rates (18.5%, p = 0.003; 29.5% p < 0.001 and 22%, p = 0.001, respectively). Central analysis of ECGs, unraveled significant prolongation of the PR segment with Evolut, Portico and Allegra whereas Evolut, Acurate, and Portico showed significant QRS widening compared to Myval. However, at discharge no differences in PR segment duration were observed while, Evolut, and Portico- but not Acurate, Allegra or Sapien-3 - still presented significant widening of QRS segment compared to Myval. CONCLUSIONS After blinded central ECG analysis, the novel Myval balloon-expandable prosthesis was associated with a low rate of early conduction disturbances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Carlo Trani
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Pedro Martin
- Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, Gran Canaria, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alfredo Redondo
- CIBERCV, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - Ana Serrador
- CIBERCV, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain
| | - Patrick W Serruys
- Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway and CORRIB Corelab and Center for Research and Imaging, Galway, Ireland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Muntané-Carol G, Okoh AK, Chen C, Nault I, Kassotis J, Mohammadi S, Coromilas J, Lee LY, Alperi A, Philippon F, Russo MJ, Rodés-Cabau J. Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring Following Minimalist Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:2711-2722. [PMID: 34949396 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the impact of delayed high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) or complete heart block (CHB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using a minimalist approach followed by ambulatory electrocardiographic (AECG) monitoring. BACKGROUND Little is known regarding the clinical impact of HAVB or CHB in the early period after discharge following TAVR. METHODS A prospective, multicenter study was conducted, including 459 consecutive TAVR patients without permanent pacemaker who underwent continuous AECG monitoring for 14 days (median length of hospital stay 2 days; IQR: 1-3 days), using 2 devices (CardioSTAT and Zio AT). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of HAVB or CHB. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 1) no right bundle branch block (RBBB) and no electrocardiographic (ECG) changes; 2) baseline RBBB with no further changes; and 3) new-onset ECG conduction disturbances. RESULTS Delayed HAVB or CHB episodes occurred in 21 patients (4.6%) (median 5 days postprocedure; IQR: 4-6 days), leading to PPM in 17 (81.0%). HAVB or CHB events were rare in group 1 (7 of 315 [2.2%]), and the incidence increased in group 2 (5 of 38 [13.2%]; P < 0.001 vs group 1) and group 3 (9 of 106 [8.5%]; P = 0.007 vs group 1; P = 0.523 vs group 2). No episodes of sudden or all-cause death occurred at 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Systematic 2-week AECG monitoring following minimalist TAVR detected HAVB and CHB episodes in about 5% of cases, with no mortality at 1 month. Whereas HAVB or CHB was rare in patients without ECG changes post-TAVR, baseline RBBB and new-onset conduction disturbances determined an increased risk. These results would support tailored management using AECG monitoring and the possibility of longer hospitalization periods in patients at higher risk for delayed HAVB or CHB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillem Muntané-Carol
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alexis K Okoh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Chunguang Chen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - John Kassotis
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Siamak Mohammadi
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - James Coromilas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Leonard Y Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Alberto Alperi
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - François Philippon
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mark J Russo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hokken TW, de Ronde M, Wolff Q, Schermers T, Ooms JF, van Wiechen MP, Kardys I, Daemen J, de Jaegere PP, Van Mieghem NM. Insights in a restricted temporary pacemaker strategy in a lean transcatheter aortic valve implantation program. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 99:1197-1205. [PMID: 34837467 PMCID: PMC9539864 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study the safety and feasibility of a restrictive temporary-RV-pacemaker use and to evaluate the need for temporary pacemaker insertion for failed left ventricular (LV) pacing ability (no ventricular capture) or occurrence of high-degree AV-blocks mandating continuous pacing. BACKGROUND Ventricular pacing remains an essential part of contemporary transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A temporary-right-ventricle (RV)-pacemaker lead is the standard approach for transient pacing during TAVI but requires central venous access. METHODS An observational registry including 672 patients who underwent TAVI between June 2018 and December 2020. Patients received pacing on the wire when necessary, unless there was a high-anticipated risk for conduction disturbances post-TAVI, based on the baseline-ECG. The follow-up period was 30 days. RESULTS A temporary-RV-pacemaker lead (RVP-cohort) was inserted in 45 patients, pacing on the wire (LVP-cohort) in 488 patients, and no pacing (NoP-cohort) in 139 patients. A bailout temporary pacemaker was implanted in 14 patients (10.1%) in the NoP-cohort and in 24 patients (4.9%) in the LVP-cohort. One patient in the LVP-cohort needed an RV-pacemaker for incomplete ventricular capture. Procedure time was significantly longer in the RVP-cohort (68 min [IQR 52-88.] vs. 55 min [IQR 44-72] in NoP-cohort and 55 min [IQR 43-71] in the LVP-cohort [p < 0.005]). Procedural high-degree AV-block occurred most often in the RVP-cohort (45% vs. 14% in the LVP and 16% in the NoP-cohort [p ≤ 0.001]). Need for new PPI occurred in 47% in the RVP-cohort, versus 20% in the NoP-cohort and 11% in the LVP-cohort (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION A restricted RV-pacemaker strategy is safe and shortens procedure time. The majority of TAVI-procedures do not require a temporary-RV-pacemaker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijmen W Hokken
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjo de Ronde
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Quinten Wolff
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thom Schermers
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris F Ooms
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten P van Wiechen
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabella Kardys
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Daemen
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter P de Jaegere
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas M Van Mieghem
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wang T, Ou A, Xia P, Tian J, Wang H, Cheng Z. Predictors for the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg 2021; 37:377-405. [PMID: 34775652 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a less invasive treatment than surgery for severe aortic stenosis. However, its use is restricted by the fact that many patients eventually require permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI). This meta-analysis was performed to identify predictors of post-TAVR PPMI. METHODS The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the pooling analysis after quality assessment. RESULTS After pooling 67 studies on post-TAVR PPMI risk in 97,294 patients, balloon-expandable valve use was negatively correlated with PPMI risk compared with self-expandable valve (SEV) use (odds ratio [OR]: 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.53). Meta-regression analysis revealed that history of coronary artery bypass grafting and higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score increased the risk of PPMI with SEV utilization. Patients with pre-existing cardiac conduction abnormalities in 28 pooled studies also had a higher risk of PPMI (OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.90-2.86). Right bundle branch block (OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 4.37-6.18) and first-degree atrioventricular block (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.38-2.79) also increased PPMI risk. Although the trans-femoral approach was positively correlated with PPMI risk, the trans-apical pathway showed no statistical difference to the trans-femoral pathway. The approach did not increase PPMI risk in patients with STS scores >8. Patient-prosthesis mismatch did not influence post-TAVR PPMI risk (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67-1.16). We also analyzed implantation depth and found no difference between patients with PPMI after TAVR and those without. CONCLUSIONS SEV selection, pre-existing cardiac conduction abnormality, and trans-femoral pathway selection are positively correlated with PPMI after TAVR. Pre-existing left bundle branch block, patient-prosthesis mismatch, and implantation depth did not affect the risk of PPMI after TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tongyu Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Aixin Ou
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Ping Xia
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Jiahu Tian
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Hongchang Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Lanzhou Medical University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zeyi Cheng
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabés JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJS, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CW, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Leclercq C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylén I, Tolosana JM. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J 2021; 42:3427-3520. [PMID: 34455430 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 861] [Impact Index Per Article: 287.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
35
|
Aymond JD, Benn F, Williams CM, Bernard ML, Hiltbold AE, Khatib S, Polin GM, Rogers PA, Tafur Soto JD, Ramee SR, Parrino PE, Falterman JB, Al-Khatib SM, Morin DP. Epidemiology, evaluation, and management of conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2021; 66:37-45. [PMID: 34332660 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Aortic stenosis is the most common valvulopathy requiring replacement by means of the surgical or transcatheter approach. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has quickly become a viable and often preferred treatment strategy compared to surgical aortic valve replacement. However, transcatheter heart valve system deployment not infrequently injures the specialized electrical system of the heart, leading to new conduction disorders including high-grade atrioventricular block and complete heart block (CHB) necessitating permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), which may lead to deleterious effects on cardiac function and patient outcomes. Additional conduction disturbances (e.g., new-onset persistent left bundle branch block, PR/QRS prolongation, and transient CHB) currently lack clearly defined management algorithms leading to variable strategies among institutions. This article outlines the current understanding of the pathophysiology, patient and procedural risk factors, means for further risk stratification and monitoring of patients without a clear indication for PPI, our institutional approach, and future directions in the management and evaluation of post-TAVR conduction disturbances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Aymond
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Francis Benn
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Cody M Williams
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | | | - A Elise Hiltbold
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Sammy Khatib
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Glenn M Polin
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Paul A Rogers
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | | | - Stephen R Ramee
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - P Eugene Parrino
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | | | - Sana M Al-Khatib
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Daniel P Morin
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fukutomi M, Hokken T, Wong I, Bieliauskas G, Daemen J, de Jaegere P, Van Mieghem N, Søndergaard L, De Backer O. Prophylactic permanent pacemaker strategy in patients with right bundle branch block undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 98:E1017-E1025. [PMID: 34390167 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report on the experience with a selective prophylactic permanent pacemaker (PPx-PPM) implantation strategy in patients with pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND Pre-existing RBBB is an independent predictor for PPM after TAVR and has been linked to increased mortality. METHODS Hospital patient flow and longer-term clinical endpoints were compared for TAVR patients with pre-existing RBBB treated in a period with and without selective PPx-PPM strategy (2013-2020). RESULTS A total of 260 patients were included: 170 in the early period without PPx-PPM strategy and 90 patients in the late period with selective PPx-PPM strategy. A PPx-PPM was implanted in 44% of patients in the late period. Overall, 69% versus 80% of all patients in the early versus late period ended up with a PPM (p = .06). Streamlined transfemoral TAVR was routinely used from 2017-in this series of patients, both TAVR procedural time and hospital length of stay (LoS) were significantly shorter in the late versus early period (mean procedural time: 70 vs. 83 min and LoS ≥5 days: 15% vs. 40%; p < .05). No difference in all-cause/cardiovascular mortality was observed between both strategies, whereas cardiac rehospitalization was significantly higher for patients treated in the early versus late period (hazard ratio 2.33 [1.04-5.26]; p = .042)-this mainly due to (sub)acute PPM-implantation early after discharge. CONCLUSIONS Selective prophylactic PPM implantation in TAVR candidates with pre-existing RBBB results in shorter TAVR procedural time and hospital LoS and prevents early cardiac rehospitalization related to complete heart block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motoki Fukutomi
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thijmen Hokken
- Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ivan Wong
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gintautas Bieliauskas
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joost Daemen
- Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter de Jaegere
- Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lars Søndergaard
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ole De Backer
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sammour Y, Krishnaswamy A, Kumar A, Puri R, Tarakji KG, Bazarbashi N, Harb S, Griffin B, Svensson L, Wazni O, Kapadia SR. Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Permanent Pacemaker Requirement After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:115-134. [PMID: 33478630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a safe and feasible alternative to surgery in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis regardless of the surgical risk. Conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain a common finding after TAVR due to the close proximity of the atrioventricular conduction system to the aortic root. High-grade atrioventricular block and new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) are the most commonly reported conduction abnormalities after TAVR. The overall rate of PPM implantation after TAVR varies and is related to pre-procedural and intraprocedural factors. The available literature regarding the impact of conduction abnormalities and PPM requirement on morbidity and mortality is still conflicting. Pre-procedural conduction abnormalities such as right bundle branch block and LBBB have been linked with increased PPM implantation and mortality after TAVR. When screening patients for TAVR, heart teams should be aware of various anatomical and pathophysiological conditions that make patients more susceptible to increased risk of conduction abnormalities and PPM requirement after the procedure. This is particularly important as TAVR has been recently approved for patients with low surgical risk. The purpose of this review is to discuss the incidence, predictors, impact, and management of the various conduction abnormalities requiring PPM implantation in patients undergoing TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasser Sammour
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Amar Krishnaswamy
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Arnav Kumar
- Andreas Gruentzig Cardiovascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rishi Puri
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Khaldoun G Tarakji
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Najdat Bazarbashi
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Serge Harb
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Brian Griffin
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lars Svensson
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Oussama Wazni
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Samir R Kapadia
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mazzella AJ, Arora S, Hendrickson MJ, Sanders M, Vavalle JP, Gehi AK. Evaluation and Management of Heart Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Card Fail Rev 2021; 7:e12. [PMID: 34386266 PMCID: PMC8353545 DOI: 10.15420/cfr.2021.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has developed substantially since its inception. Improvements in valve design, valve deployment technologies, preprocedural imaging and increased operator experience have led to a gradual decline in length of hospitalisation after TAVR. Despite these advances, the need for permanent pacemaker implantation for post-TAVR high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) has persisted and has well-established risk factors which can be used to identify patients who are at high risk and advise them accordingly. While most HAVB occurs within 48 hours of the procedure, there is a growing number of patients developing HAVB after initial hospitalisation for TAVR due to the trend for early discharge from hospital. Several observation and management strategies have been proposed. This article reviews major known risk factors for HAVB after TAVR, discusses trends in the timing of HAVB after TAVR and reviews some management strategies for observing transient HAVB after TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J Mazzella
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Hospitals Chapel Hill, NC, US
| | - Sameer Arora
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Hospitals Chapel Hill, NC, US
| | | | - Mason Sanders
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Hospitals Chapel Hill, NC, US
| | - John P Vavalle
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Hospitals Chapel Hill, NC, US
| | - Anil K Gehi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Hospitals Chapel Hill, NC, US
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sammour Y, Sato K, Kumar A, Gajulapalli RD, Lak H, Chawla S, Banerjee K, Kaur M, Patel J, Incognito C, Svensson L, Popovic Z, Tarakji K, Wazni O, Reed GW, Yun J, Puri R, Krishnaswamy A, Kapadia SR. Impact of baseline conduction abnormalities on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with SAPIEN-3. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 98:E127-E138. [PMID: 33010100 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Baseline conduction abnormalities are known risk factors for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to determine the impact of baseline right bundle branch block (RBBB), left bundle branch block (LBBB), left anterior hemiblock (LAHB), first-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) and atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) on TAVR outcomes. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR with SAPIEN-3 (S3) were included. We excluded patients with prior PPM, nontransfemoral access or valve-in-valve. RESULTS Among 886 patients, baseline RBBB was seen in 15.9%, LBBB in 6.3%, LAHB in 6.2%, first-degree AVB in 26.3% and AF in 37.5%. The rate of 30-day PPM was 10.1%. Baseline RBBB (OR 4.005; 95% CI 2.386-6.723; p < .001) and first-degree AVB (OR 1.847; 95% CI 1.133-3.009; p = .014) were independent predictors of 30 day PPM. LAHB also resulted in higher PPM rates but only in unadjusted analysis (21.8% vs. 9.4%; p = .003). Baseline LBBB and AF were associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at both baseline and 1 year after TAVR. However, Δ LVEF over time were noted to be similar with baseline LBBB (1.8% vs. 1.4%; p = .809) and AF (1.1% vs. 1.7%; p = .458). Moreover, baseline AF was also associated with higher stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) at 1 year (4.4% vs. 1.8%; p = .019), 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (19.5% vs. 13.3%; p = .012) and 2 year mortality (23.5% vs. 15.2%; p = .016). None of the other baseline conduction defects affected long-term mortality or MACCE. CONCLUSION In our S3 TAVR population, baseline RBBB and first-degree AVB predicted higher PPM risk. Prior LBBB and AF were associated with lower LVEF at both baseline and 1 year. Lastly, preexisting AF was associated with higher rates of mortality, stroke/TIA, and MACCE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasser Sammour
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kimi Sato
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Arnav Kumar
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rama Dilip Gajulapalli
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Hassan Lak
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sanchit Chawla
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kinjal Banerjee
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Manpreet Kaur
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jay Patel
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Cameron Incognito
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lars Svensson
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Zoran Popovic
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Khaldoun Tarakji
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Oussama Wazni
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Grant W Reed
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - James Yun
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rishi Puri
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Amar Krishnaswamy
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Samir R Kapadia
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Impact of Bundle Branch Block on Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10122719. [PMID: 34205478 PMCID: PMC8235153 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10122719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Data regarding the impact of infra-Hisian conduction disturbances leading to permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain limited. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of right and/or left bundle branch block (RBBB/LBBB) on post-TAVI PPI. We performed a systematic literature review to identify studies reporting on RBBB and/or LBBB status and post-TAVI PPI. Study design, patient characteristics, and the presence of branch block were analyzed. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI were extracted. The final analysis included 36 studies, reporting about 55,851 patients. Data on LBBB were extracted from 33 studies. Among 51,026 patients included, 5503 showed pre-implant LBBB (11.9% (10.4%–13.8%)). The influence of LBBB on post-TAVI PPI was not significant OR 1.1474 (0.9025; 1.4588), p = 0.2618. Data on RBBB were extracted from 28 studies. Among 46,663 patients included, 31,603 showed pre-implant RBBB (9.2% (7.3%–11.6%)). The influence of RBBB on post-TAVI PPI was significant OR 4.8581 (4.1571; 5.6775), p < 0.0001. From this meta-analysis, the presence of RBBB increased the risk for post-TAVI PPI, independent of age or LVEF, while this finding was not confirmed for patients experimenting with LBBB. This result emphasizes the need for pre-operative evaluation strategies in patient selection for TAVI.
Collapse
|
41
|
Weferling M, Liebetrau C, Renker M, Fischer-Rasokat U, Choi YH, Hamm CW, Kim WK. Right bundle branch block is not associated with worse short- and mid-term outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0253332. [PMID: 34133470 PMCID: PMC8208572 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the standard treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at intermediate or high surgical risk. Preexisting right bundle branch block (RBBB) is a strong predictor of new pacemaker implantation (PPM) after TAVI, and previous data indicate a worse short- and long-term outcome of patients. The aim of this study was to investigate whether preexisting RBBB has an effect on the short- and mid-term outcome of patients undergoing TAVI in a German high-volume TAVI center. Methods For the present retrospective analysis, a total of 1,891 patients with native severe AS with successful TAVI without preexisting PPM were included. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality after 30 days and 12 months. Baseline RBBB was present in 190 (10.1%) of cases. Results Patients with preexisting RBBB had a considerably higher rate of new PPM after TAVI compared with patients without RBBB (87/190 [45.8%] vs. 219/1,701 [12.9%]; p<0.001). RBBB had no impact on all-cause mortality at 30 days (2.1% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.625) and at 12 months (14.4% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.765). Further stratification according to the presence of new PPM showed a difference in mid-term survival rates between the four groups, with the worst outcome for patients without RBBB and new PPM (log rank p = 0.024). However, no difference in mid-term cardiovascular survival was found. Conclusion Preexisting RBBB is a common finding in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI and is associated with considerably higher PPM rates but not with worse short- and mid-term outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maren Weferling
- Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Department of Cardiology, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain, Berlin, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Christoph Liebetrau
- Cardioangiological Center Bethanien (CCB), Department of Cardiology, Agaplesion Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Matthias Renker
- Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Department of Cardiology, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | | | - Yeoung-Hoon Choi
- Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Christian W. Hamm
- Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Department of Cardiology, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Won-Keun Kim
- Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Department of Cardiology, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bad Nauheim, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Conduction Disturbances and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Predictors and Prevention. Cardiol Rev 2021; 30:179-187. [PMID: 34132653 DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Conduction disturbances and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) remain a frequent and important consequence of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Understanding risk factors for TAVR-related conduction disturbances could improve patient selection, procedural techniques, and peri-procedural efforts for monitoring and treatment of heart block. Several studies have identified patient-related and procedural factors associated with new-onset left bundle branch block, high-degree atrioventricular block, and the need for PPMI after TAVR. Notable patient-related predictors include pre-existing right bundle branch block, membranous septal length, and calcification of the left ventricular outflow tract. Modifiable procedural predictors include device implantation depth, prosthesis oversizing, and valve type. This review aims to summarize the current literature examining predictors of conduction disturbances and PPMI after TAVR, particularly with regard to the newer-generation valve types. We also propose a management algorithm for the management of conduction disturbances post-procedure.
Collapse
|
43
|
Prophylactic Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block Undergoing TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:1272-1274. [PMID: 34112469 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
44
|
El-Sabawi B, Welle GA, Cha YM, Espinosa RE, Gulati R, Sandhu GS, Greason KL, Crestanello JA, Friedman PA, Munger TM, Rihal CS, Eleid MF. Temporal Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e020033. [PMID: 33960210 PMCID: PMC8200694 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.120.020033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background The temporal incidence of high‐grade atrioventricular block (HAVB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is uncertain. As a result, periprocedural monitoring and pacing strategies remain controversial. This study aimed to describe the temporal incidence of initial episode of HAVB stratified by pre‐ and post‐TAVR conduction and identify predictors of delayed events. Methods and Results Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR at a single center between February 2012 and June 2019 were retrospectively assessed for HAVB within 30 days. Patients with prior aortic valve replacement, permanent pacemaker (PPM), or conversion to surgical replacement were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of delayed HAVB (initial event >24 hours post‐TAVR). A total of 953 patients were included in this study. HAVB occurred in 153 (16.1%). After exclusion of those with prophylactic PPM placed post‐TAVR, the incidence of delayed HAVB was 33/882 (3.7%). Variables independently associated with delayed HAVB included baseline first‐degree atrioventricular block or right bundle‐branch block, self‐expanding valve, and new left bundle‐branch block. Forty patients had intraprocedural transient HAVB, including 16 who developed HAVB recurrence and 6 who had PPM implantation without recurrence. PPM was placed for HAVB in 130 (13.6%) (self‐expanding valve, 23.7% versus balloon‐expandable valve, 11.9%; P<0.001). Eight (0.8%) patients died by 30 days, including 1 unexplained without PPM present. Conclusions Delayed HAVB occurs with higher frequency in patients with baseline first‐degree atrioventricular block or right bundle‐branch block, new left bundle‐branch block, and self‐expanding valve. These findings provide insight into optimal monitoring and pacing strategies based on periprocedural ECG findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yong-Mei Cha
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | - Raúl E Espinosa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | - Rajiv Gulati
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | | | - Kevin L Greason
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | | | - Paul A Friedman
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | - Thomas M Munger
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | | | - Mackram F Eleid
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
De Backer O, Wong I, Wilkins B, Carranza CL, Søndergaard L. Patient-Tailored Aortic Valve Replacement. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:658016. [PMID: 33969021 PMCID: PMC8096928 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.658016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Contemporary surgical and transcatheter aortic valve interventions offer effective therapy for a broad range of patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve disease. Both approaches have seen significant advances in recent years. Guidelines have previously emphasized ‘surgical risk’ in the decision between surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), although this delineation becomes increasingly obsolete with more evidence on the effectiveness of TAVR in low surgical risk candidates. More importantly, decisions in tailoring aortic valve interventions should be patient-centered, accounting not only for operative risk, but also anatomy, lifetime management and specific co-morbidities. Aspects to be considered in a patient-tailored aortic valve intervention are discussed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ole De Backer
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ivan Wong
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ben Wilkins
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Søndergaard
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yano M, Egami Y, Ukita K, Kawamura A, Nakamura H, Matsuhiro Y, Yasumoto K, Tsuda M, Okamoto N, Tanaka A, Matsunaga-Lee Y, Shutta R, Nishino M, Tanouchi J. Impact of Baseline Right Bundle Branch Block on Outcomes After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2021; 144:60-66. [PMID: 33385350 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is one of the most frequent alterations of the electrocardiogram. Several studies have shown that RBBB is a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases. However, the clinical outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with RBBB remain unclear. We enrolled consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent PVI from the Osaka Rosai Atrial Fibrillation (ORAF) registry. We excluded patients with other wide QRS morphologies (left bundle branch block, ventricular pacing, and unclassified intraventricular conduction disturbances) and divided them into 2 groups: RBBB (QRS duration ≥120msec) and No-RBBB (QRS duration <120) groups. We compared the incidence of late recurrence of AF and/or atrial tachycardia (AT) (LRAF) between the 2 groups using a propensity score-matched analysis and evaluated the risk of LRAF using Cox regression model. We finally analyzed 671 consecutive AF patients. The RBBB group consisted of 50 patients (7.5%) and the No-RBBB group of 621 patients. Median follow-up duration was 734 [496, 1,049] days. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were significantly higher in RBBB group than No-RBBB group. Among the 46 matched patients pairs, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that RBBB group had a significantly greater risk of LRAF than the No-RBBB group (p = 0.046). The Cox regression model revealed significantly higher risks of LRAF (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.00 to 5.33; p=0.044) in RBBB group compared with No-RBBB group. Non-PV AF triggers were significantly higher in RBBB group than No-RBBB group (p = 0.048). In conclusion, RBBB can be an important predictor of LRAF after PVI.
Collapse
|
47
|
Deutsch O, Deisenhofer I, Koch-Buettner K, Lange R, Krane M. Need for permanent pacemaker implantation following implantation of the rapid deployment valve in combined procedures: a single centre cohort study. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:2128-2136. [PMID: 34012563 PMCID: PMC8107573 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-3120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Rapid deployment aortic valves may interfere with the cardiac conduction system. We investigated the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following the implantation of Edwards INTUITY valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Methods One hundred twenty patients underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the INTUITY valve in a combined procedure at the German Heart Centre Munich between April 2016 and December 2019. Twenty-four patients with prior PPI or concomitant ablation procedures (24/120, 20%) were excluded. Patient-specific, procedural and post-procedural outcomes were assessed in the remaining 96 cases. Results AVR was successful in all cases. Seventy-four percent of the study population were men. Mean age was 69.5±7.6 years. EuroSCORE II was 3.2±2.9. Forty-six patients (46/96, 47.9%) presented with pre-operative conduction disorders, right bundle branch block (RBBB) (17/96, 17.7%) and first-degree or second degree atrio-ventricular block (AVB) (18/96, 18.8%), in particular. In total, 9 patients (9/96, 9.4%) underwent PPI. PPI was required in 3 patients (3/50, 6.0%) who did not have a pre-existing conduction disorder due to new high degree AVB. 6 patients with pre-operative conduction disorders (6/46, 13%) needed PPI. Timing of PPI was 5.2±1.5 days (median 5). Independent predictors of PPI were preoperative RBBB [odds ratio (OR) =4.554, P=0.049] and large valve size (#27) (OR =5.527, P=0.031). Conclusions The analysis of the data collected enabled us to identify patient factors associated with higher risk for post-operative PPI following AVR with the INTUITY valve. Patient factors associated with post-operative PPI, were RBBB and large valve size. These patients should be closely monitored following the procedure, in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Deutsch
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich of the Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,INSURE (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery), German Heart Centre Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabell Deisenhofer
- Department of Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich of the Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Koch-Buettner
- Department of Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich of the Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Lange
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich of the Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,INSURE (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery), German Heart Centre Munich, Munich, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research)-Partner Site Munich, Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Krane
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich of the Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,INSURE (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery), German Heart Centre Munich, Munich, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research)-Partner Site Munich, Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Perpetua EM, Guibone KA, Keegan PA, Palmer R, Speight MK, Jagnic K, Michaels J, Nguyen RA, Pickett ES, Ramsey D, Schnell SJ, Wong SC, Reisman M. Best Practice Recommendations for Optimizing Care in Structural Heart Programs: Planning Efficient and Resource Leveraging Systems (PEARLS). STRUCTURAL HEART 2021; 5:168-179. [PMID: 35378800 PMCID: PMC8968322 DOI: 10.1080/24748706.2021.1877858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The COVID19 pandemic brought unprecedented disruption to healthcare. Staggering morbidity, mortality, and economic losses prompted the review and refinement of care for structural heart disease (SHD). To mitigate negative impacts in the face of crisis or capacity constraints, this paper offers best practice recommendations for Planning Efficient and Resource Leveraging Systems (PEARLS) in structural heart programs. A systematic assessment is recommended for hospital capacity, Heart Team roles and functions, and patient and procedural risks associated with increased resource utilization. Strategies, tactics, and pathways are provided for the delivery of patient-centered, efficient and resource-leveraging care from referral to follow-up. Through the optimal use of capacity and resources, paired with dynamic triage, forecasting, and surveillance, Heart Teams may aspire to plan and implement an optimized system of care for SHD. Abbreviations: AS: aortic stenosis; ASD: atrioseptal defect; COVID19: Coronavirus disease 19; LAAO: left atrial appendage occlusion; MI: myocardial infarction; MR: mitral regurgitation; PFO: patent foramen ovale; PVL: paravalvular leak; SHD: structural heart disease; SAVR: surgical aortic valve replacement; SDM: shared decision-making; TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacement; TMVr: transcatheter mitral valve repair; TMVR: transcatheter mitral valve replacement; TEE: transesophageal echocardiography; TTE: transthoracic echocardiography.
Collapse
|
49
|
Muntané-Carol G, Philippon F, Nault I, Faroux L, Alperi A, Mittal S, Rodés-Cabau J. Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77:1344-1356. [PMID: 33706878 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has changed the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, the occurrence of conduction disturbances has not decreased significantly over time and remains the main drawback of the procedure. In addition, new-onset atrial fibrillation is the most frequent tachyarrhythmia during the hospitalization period and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. However, little is known regarding the incidence and clinical impact of arrhythmic events beyond the periprocedural TAVR period. Ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) monitoring has recently emerged as a tool to unravel the complex issue of arrhythmic disorders (bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias) before and after TAVR. To date, the preliminary results from the initial experience using AECG monitoring systems showed the safety, usefulness, and potential clinical implications of this diagnostic tool in TAVR recipients. This review provides an overview of the current status, clinical implications, and future perspectives of AECG monitoring in the TAVR setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillem Muntané-Carol
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. https://twitter.com/MuntaneCarol
| | - François Philippon
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Laurent Faroux
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alberto Alperi
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Suneet Mittal
- Snyder Center for Comprehensive Atrial Fibrillation and Department of Cardiology at Valley Health System, Ridgewood, New Jersey, USA
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Stankowski T, Mangner N, Linke A, Aboul-Hassan SS, Gąsior T, Muehle A, Herwig V, Harnath A, Salem M, Szłapka M, Grimmig O, Just S, Fritzsche D, Perek B. Cardiac conduction abnormalities in patients with degenerated bioprostheses undergoing transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantations and their impact on long-term outcomes. Int J Cardiol 2021; 330:16-22. [PMID: 33592238 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationship between preoperative cardiac conduction abnormalities (CCA) and long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation (TAVI-VIV) remains unclear. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of preoperative CCA on mortality and morbidity after TAVI-VIV and to estimate the impact of new-onset CCA on postoperative outcomes. METHODS Between 2011 and 2020, 201 patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses were qualified for TAVI-VIV procedures in two German heart centers. Cases with previously implanted permanent rhythm-controlling devices were excluded (n = 53). A total of 148 subjects met the eligibility criteria and were divided into 2 study groups according to the presence of preexisting CCA (CCA (n = 84) and non-CCA (n = 64), respectively). Early and late mortality and morbidity were evaluated. Follow-up functional status was assessed according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. RESULTS There were no procedural deaths. TAVI-VIV related new-onset CCAs were observed in 35.8% patients. The 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 1.6% in non-CCA vs 9.5% in CCA group (p = 0.045). Preexisting right bundle-branch block (OR:5.01; 95%CI, 1.05-23.84) and first-degree atrioventricular block (OR:4.55; 95%CI, 1.10-18.73) were independent predictors of new pacemaker implantation. One-year and five-year probability of survival were comparable in CCA and non-CCA groups: 90.3% vs 91.8% and 68.2% vs 74.3%, respectively. Surviving patients with preexisting and new-onset CCA had a worse functional status according to NYHA classification at follow-up. CONCLUSION Preexisting and new-onset postoperative CCAs did not affect early and late mortality after TAVI-VIV procedures, however, they may have a negative impact on late functional status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Stankowski
- Sana Heart Center Cottbus, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cottbus, Germany.
| | - Norman Mangner
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Axel Linke
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Tomasz Gąsior
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anja Muehle
- Sana Heart Center Cottbus, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Volker Herwig
- Sana Heart Center Cottbus, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Axel Harnath
- Sana Heart Center Cottbus, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Mohammed Salem
- Department of Cardiology, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Michał Szłapka
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Asklepios Klinik Harburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Grimmig
- Sana Heart Center Cottbus, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Soeren Just
- Sana Heart Center Cottbus, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Dirk Fritzsche
- Sana Heart Center Cottbus, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Bartłomiej Perek
- Department of Cardiac Surgery and Transplantology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|