Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure After Cryptogenic Stroke

Techniques for Identifying a Patent Foramen Ovale: Transthoracic Echocardiography, Transesophageal Echocardiography, Transcranial Doppler, Right Heart Catheterization

Noninvasive and invasive imaging modalities play important roles for the detection of patent foramen ovale (PFO). Transthoracic echocardiography or transcranial Doppler bubble study can be used for initial noninvasive PFO screening. For diagnostic confirmation, transesophageal echocardiography bubble study can be utilized, a semiinvasive confirmatory test that can directly visualize a PFO. In selective cases when the diagnosis is in doubt, PFO can be accurately diagnosed invasively with right heart catheterization. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each diagnostic option will help clinicians choose the appropriate test for patients presenting with a PFO-associated condition who may benefit from percutaneous device closure.

Transcatheter PFO closure for cryptogenic stroke: current approaches and future considerations

Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a common congenital atrial septal defect present in 20%-35% of the general population. Although generally considered a benign anatomic variant, a PFO may facilitate passage of a thrombus from the venous to arterial circulation, thereby resulting in cryptogenic stroke or systemic embolization. A PFO is detected in nearly one half of patients presenting with cryptogenic stroke and often considered the most likely etiology when other causes have been excluded. In this review, we discuss the contemporary role of transcatheter closure of PFO in the treatment of cryptogenic stroke, including devices currently available for commercial use in the United States (Amplatzer PFOTM Occluder and GoreTM Cardioform Septal Occluder) and a novel suture-mediated device (NobleStitchTM EL) under clinical investigation. To provide the best care for cryptogenic stroke patients, practitioners should be familiar with the indications for PFO closure and corresponding treatment options.

The 2022 FASEB Virtual Catalyst Conference on the Cardiac Interatrial Septum and Stroke Risk, December 7, 2022

There is emerging evidence that the cardiac interatrial septum has an important role as a thromboembolic source for ischemic strokes. There is little consensus on treatment of patients with different cardiac interatrial morphologies or pathologies who have had stroke. In this paper, we summarize the important background, diagnostic, and treatment considerations for this patient population as presented during the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) Virtual Catalytic Conference on the Cardiac Interatrial Septum and Stroke Risk, held on December 7, 2022. During this conference, many aspects of the cardiac interatrial septum were discussed. Among these were the embryogenesis of the interatrial septum and development of anatomic variants such as patent foramen ovale and left atrial septal pouch. Also addressed were various mechanisms of injury such as shunting physiologies and the consequences that can result from anatomic variants, as well as imaging considerations in echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment options including anticoagulation and closure were addressed, as well as an in-depth discussion on whether the left atrial septal pouch is a stroke risk factor. These issues were discussed and debated by multiple experts from neurology, cardiology, and radiology.

Patent foramen Ovale-related paradoxical embolism after noncardiac surgery

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a remnant of the fetal circulation that remains in a significant portion of the adult population, predisposing to a higher risk of stroke. This risk is further elevated in the postoperative hypercoagulative period. Here we present a case where a patient underwent a total knee arthroplasty and presented with right-sided hemiparesis on post-operative day 2. Subsequently, the patient underwent percutaneous PFO closure with a 25-mm Amplatzer PFO Occluder (Abbott; Chicago, IL, USA). The patient has not had a stroke since the PFO closure. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated superiority of percutaneous PFO closure over standard-of-care medical therapy for secondary prevention of PFO-associated stroke. Since post-operative PFO-associated stroke is under-recognized in clinical practice, further large-cohort studies are needed to evaluate whether PFO screening and device closure would decrease post-operative stroke risk for noncardiac surgeries.

Learning Objective

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a remnant of the fetal circulation commonly found in the adult population, which can increase the risk of stroke. Stroke is a complication of PFO, yet closure of this remnant only occurs on a specific case-by-case basis. Further research in this area is required to determine whether a larger population would benefit from PFO closure.

A new era in patent foramen ovale closure - a percutaneous suture-based 'deviceless' technique (NobleStitch®): Experience of a Portuguese center

INTRODUCTION

In patients with cryptogenic stroke, one of the most frequently found abnormalities is patent foramen ovale (PFO). Percutaneous 'deviceless' systems based on surgical suture-mediated PFO closure have recently been introduced and show a favorable efficacy and safety profile with clear advantages.

OBJECTIVES

To present procedural details of the technique and baseline characteristics of patients who underwent the procedure in our center.

METHODS

A single-center prospective observational registry was established between February 2020 and February 2021, to assess the safety, efficacy and possible advantages of a novel percutaneous PFO closure system (NobleStitch® EL). Patient and PFO characteristics as well as technical features were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were considered suitable for this technique after transesophageal echocardiography. Their mean age was 51 years and 69.5% were women. Most patients (91.3%) had a history of cryptogenic stroke. PFO closure with the NobleStitch® system was successfully performed in all patients. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia and fluoroscopic monitoring. The mean duration of the procedure was 52 min and median contrast dose used was 187 ml. Median radiation dose absorbed per patient was 61.5 Gy cm². All patients were discharged asymptomatic 24 hours after the procedure with no peri- or postprocedural complications recorded.

CONCLUSION

Suture-mediated PFO closure represents a valid and safe alternative to traditional umbrella-like devices, and is feasible in the majority of PFO anatomies. Follow-up information, results of larger series and clinical trials may possibly validate this technique as the first choice for PFO closure.

[Detection of secondary atrial fibrillation following percutaneous foramen ovale closure for cryptogenic stroke using an insertable cardiac monitor: a case report]

A 61-year-old man presented with transient dysarthria and left upper extremity numbness. Head MRI showed an acute infarct in the left temporal lobe and multiple old infarcts in the bilateral cortices. A transesophageal echocardiogram revealed a patent foramen ovale with a large shunt. No deep vein thrombosis was found. He suffered a recurrent cerebral infarction while taking antiplatelet therapy. An insertable cardiac monitor was implanted on the 41st day, and the antiplatelet treatment was changed to warfarin. The insertable cardiac monitor did not detect atrial fibrillation, even when the patient had a recurrent transient ischemic attack on the 57th day under warfarin therapy. The patient underwent percutaneous foramen ovale closure on the 63rd day. On postoperative days 18-25, an insertable cardiac monitor detected brief atrial fibrillation, and he took rivaroxaban for three months. Atrial fibrillation may occur secondary to percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for cryptogenic stroke. The insertable cardiac monitor may help diagnose the pathogenesis of secondary atrial fibrillation and determine the optimal antithrombotic therapy.

Adjunct Methods for the Detection of Patent Foramen Ovale: The Contribution of Transcranial Doppler and the Valsalva Manoeuvre

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in 25% of the population. In some patients, especially those without traditional stroke risk factors and with no immediately apparent cause, a cryptogenic stroke may be caused by an embolus passing through the PFO to the systemic circulation. The identification, or indeed exclusion, of a PFO is sought in these patients, most commonly using contrast-enhanced transthoracic or transoesophageal echocardiography. Another method for detecting a PFO is transcranial Doppler, which allows the detection of PFO possibly without the need for an echo laboratory, and with arguably improved sensitivity. This review will focus on transcranial Doppler detection of PFO, with a brief summary of echocardiographic techniques and the use of ultrasound contrast agents, and the role of provocations to increase diagnostic accuracy, specifically the Valsalva manoeuvre. We discuss the phases alongside the direct and indirect signs of an adequate Valsalva manoeuvre.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy alone after cryptogenic stroke

Background

Closure of a patent foramen ovale reduces the risk of recurrent stroke compared with medical therapy alone in young patients with cryptogenic strokes revealed by randomized control trials. Some cost-effectiveness analyses outside Japan have shown that patent foramen ovale closure is cost-effective, but no studies have examined cost-effectiveness in Japan. The objective of this study is to assess cost-effectiveness, from the perspective of a Japanese healthcare payer, of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy alone for patients with patent foramen ovale related to cryptogenic strokes.

Methods

A cost-effectiveness study was conducted by developing a decision tree and a Markov model. Probabilities and a 5.9-year time horizon followed the RESPECT study. Utilities and costs were based upon published studies and assumptions. All assumptions were assessed by experts, including a cardiologist and a statistical expert. The target population comprised patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale, aged 60 years or younger. The model was discounted at 2.0% and its cycle was one month. A willingness-to-pay threshold is set at $50,000 / quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was evaluated. Then one-way sensitivity analyses as deterministic sensitivity analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess data robustness.

Results

Incremental quality-adjusted life years, incremental costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were 0.464, $13,562, and $29,208 per QALY gained, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the stable state utility score difference between patent foramen ovale closure and medical therapy had the largest impact on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Patent foramen ovale closure is cost-effective at a stable state utility score difference of >0.051, compared with medical therapy. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that patent foramen ovale closure was 50.3% cost-effective.

Conclusions

Patent foramen ovale closure was cost-effective compared with medical therapy for Japanese patients with cryptogenic stroke who were ≤60 years.

Patent foramen ovale closure review: decades of research and the evolution of the evidence

Background

A quarter of the population suffers from patent foramen ovale, a form of interatrial shunt. It has been linked to cryptogenic strokes and is a common cause of paradoxical embolism.

Main text

The benefit of closing the patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke patients aged 18-60 years to prevent recurrent strokes, particularly in those with large shunts or associated atrial septal aneurysms, was recently demonstrated. It is a relatively safe procedure that necessitates post-operative anticoagulation, but it has been linked to new-onset atrial fibrillation of uncertain significance. The effectiveness of patent foramen closure depends on patient selection, and prediction scores such as the Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score should be used. Newer closure devices, such as bioabsorbable devices like the Biostar system and ‘device-less’ devices like the Noble Stitch, are becoming more common due to their lower operative risks. The use of such devices in future trials, as well as careful case selection, could improve the acceptability of patent foramen ovale closure in the general population, removing the need for perioperative anticoagulation.

Conclusion

Individuals aged 18-60 years with cryptogenic stroke who have adverse patent foramen ovale morphology on imaging should be offered patent foramen ovale closure, preferably using the newer closure devices. More studies are needed to determine the significance of periprocedural atrial fibrillation after device closure.

Uncertainties and Controversies in the Management of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of patent foramen ovale closure over medical therapy alone for patients who have had a stroke that has been attributed to the patent foramen ovale. Nevertheless, there are many areas of uncertainty and controversy related to patient selection, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. We summarize the available data on these challenging topics and attempt to provide some clarity and future directions for clinicians and investigators.

Patent foramen ovale closure in India; Feasibility, challenges and mid-term outcomes

Patent foramen ovale closure (PFO) is an underutilized therapy, and our study explored the challenges and feasibility of PFO closure in the Indian setting. Eighty patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS) were screened by transcranial Doppler (TCD) for PFO. Twenty-nine patients underwent successful closure. High-risk features of a long tunnel, inter-atrial septal aneurysm, and large defect were present in 31%, 28%, and 59%. Transcranial Doppler had a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 53% (p = 0.02) to detect PFO. Anticoagulation was withdrawn in 85% of patients post closure. Two patients had residual shunts at follow-up of 19 (9,34) months.

Effect of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure After Stroke on Circulatory Biomarkers

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure on circulatory biomarkers.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with PFO-related stroke were prospectively enrolled and followed with serial sampling of cardiac atrial and venous blood pre- and post-PFO closure over time. Candidate biomarkers were identified by mass spectrometry in a discovery cohort first, and lead candidates were validated in an independent cohort.

RESULTS

Patients with PFO-related stroke (n = 254) were recruited and followed up to 4 years (median 2.01; interquartile range 0.77-2.54). Metabolite profiling in the discovery cohort (n = 12) identified homocysteine as the most significantly decreased factor in intracardiac plasma after PFO closure (false discovery rate 0.001). This was confirmed in a validation cohort (n = 181), where intracardiac total homocysteine (tHcy) was immediately reduced in patients with complete closure, but not in those with residual shunting, suggesting association of PFO shunting with tHcy elevation (β 0.115; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.047-0.183; p = 0.001). tHcy reduction was more dramatic in left atrium than right (p < 0.001), suggesting clearance through pulmonary circulation. Long-term effect of PFO closure was also monitored and compared to medical treatment alone (n = 61). Complete PFO closure resulted in long-term tHcy reduction in peripheral blood, whereas medical therapy alone showed no effect (β -0.208; 95% CI -0.375∼-0.058; p = 0.007). Residual shunting was again independently associated with persistently elevated tHcy (β 0.184; 95% CI 0.051-0.316; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

PFO shunting may contribute to circulatory tHcy elevation, which is renormalized by PFO closure. PFO is not just a door for clots, but may itself enhance clot formation and injure neurovasculature by clot-independent mechanisms. Biomarkers such as tHcy can potentially serve as cost-effective measures of residual shunting and neurovascular risk for PFO stroke.

Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in the Greek population is high and impacts on the interpretation of the risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score

Background:

The risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score calculates the probability that patent foramen ovale (PFO) is causally related to stroke (PFO attributable fraction, PFOAF), based on PFO prevalence in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) compared with that in the general population. The latter has been estimated at 25%; however, PFO prevalence in nonselected populations varies widely.

Methods:

Since PFO prevalence in Greece remains unknown, we evaluated it and we calculated PFOAF stratified by RoPE score in a cohort of patients with CS ⩽55 years old. PFO was detected according to the international consensus transcranial Doppler (TCD) criteria in 124 healthy subjects (H), in 102 patients with CS, and in 56 patients with stroke of known cause (nonCS). Each subject underwent unilateral middle cerebral artery recording after infusion of agitated saline, at rest, and after a controlled Valsalva maneuver. We characterized PFO as large (>20 microbubbles or curtain), moderate (11–20), and small (⩽10).

Results:

PFO was detected in 42.7% of H, 49% of CS, and 25% of nonCS (p = 0.013). Large PFOs were numerically higher in CS [28.4% (29/102)] compared with H [19.3% (24/124); p = 0.1] and to nonCS [7.1% (4/56), p = 0.04]. The median RoPE score in patients with CS and PFO was seven. Even patients with very high RoPE score (9–10) had moderate PFOAF (57%). For any individual stratum up to RopE score 8, PFOAF was <33%.

Conclusions:

PFO prevalence in the Greek population is much higher than the widely accepted 25%. PFO may be the cause of stroke in one out of nine Greek patients with CS. Among Greek CS patients who harbor a PFO, the latter is causal in one out of five. The established RoPE score cutoff of ⩾7 for having a probable PFO-associated stroke may overestimate the probability in patients deriving from populations with high PFO prevalence.

New-onset atrial fibrillation following percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A patent foramen ovale (PFO), present in up to 25% of adults, is an embryologic remnant which allows for right to left shunting and has been implicated in cryptogenic stroke (Neill and Lin, Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 13(3):152-159, 2017; Bass 2015). The current standard of care for selected patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke is transcatheter closure, but the risk of post-closure, new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown (Vaidya et al., Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 8(6):739-753, 2018; Kjeld et al., Acta Radiol Open. 7(9):2058460118793922, 2018; Staubach et al., Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 74(6):889-95, 2009). This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence on AF development post transcatheter PFO closure and predictors of AF development, and assessed existing knowledge gaps.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were selected according to the inclusion criteria of adults that underwent a transcatheter PFO closure without a history of AF. Studies were retrieved from electronic databases from inception until February 2019. A Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation was performed for meta-analysis of AF incidence rate.

RESULTS

From 765 studies, 45 were included in quantitative data synthesis. Study sample sizes ranged between 20 and 1887 individuals, and average patient age between 37 to 67 years across studies. The overall incidence rate was 0.013 person-years, and 0.014 person-years for the within 6 months follow-up subgroup. There was no consistency in reported predictors of AF development.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of AF post-PFO closure was low across studies, with a high level of between-study heterogeneity. Until a concerted effort is made to improve accurate AF diagnosis, it will be difficult to gauge the association between transcatheter PFO closure and incidence of AF.

Network meta-analysis on patent foramen ovale: is a stroke or atrial fibrillation worse?

OBJECTIVE

Systematic reviews suggest that patent foramen ovale closure (PFOc) is performed percutaneously with low complication rates. We did a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing devices for PFO closures, evaluating safety and efficacy of transcatheter PFOc in preventing neurological events in patients with stroke when compared with medical therapy (MT), and assessing risk of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We searched 3 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL/CCTR) identifying six randomized controlled trials from 2012 until December 2019. We performed a Bayesian NMA; number-needed-to-treat and number-needed-to-harm were derived by applying the estimated odds ratios (ORs). The likelihood of being helped or harmed (LHH) was evaluated to estimate the risk-effectiveness balance.

RESULTS

The 3560 patients allocated to PFOc were less subject to a stroke than patients with MT. The overall ORs of PFOc versus MT were 0.41 with fixed-effects, and 0.22 with random-effects model. NMA proves that PFOc induces AF episodes significantly higher than MT, even when analysis is limited to only new episodes of "serious AF." LHH (0.68 fixed-effects, 0.79 random-effects) showed that strokes saved are less than cases of AFs added. By considering only serious AF, strokes saved are higher than serious AFs induced by the PFOc (LHH was 3.46 and 4.00 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

NMA supported PFOc in patients with cryptogenic stroke, confirming that devices are better than MT, but increase the risk of AF by over 2/4 times (serious or unserious AF). Considering serious AFs (real risky clinical condition), patients have more advantages in being treated, since LHH is ≥ 3-4.

Patent Foramen Ovale Attributable Cryptogenic Embolism With Thrombophilia Has Higher Risk for Recurrence and Responds to Closure

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of management on the risk for recurrent events among patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

BACKGROUND

The combination of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and hypercoagulability may greatly increase the risk for paradoxical embolism. However, previous randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of PFO closure excluded these potential high-risk patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with PFO attributable cryptogenic embolism were prospectively, without randomization, recruited from January 2005 to March 2018. The relationship between thrombophilia and recurrent events was evaluated in overall patients. Multivariate Cox regression was conducted to assess the relative risk for recurrence in PFO closure and medical therapy groups.

RESULTS

A total of 591 patients with cryptogenic embolism with PFO were identified. The median duration of follow-up was 53 months, and thrombophilia significantly increased the risk for recurrent events (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 3.16; p = 0.024). PFO closure was superior to medical therapy in overall patients (HR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.30; p < 0.001). Of the 134 patients (22.7%) with thrombophilia, there was a difference in the risk for recurrence events between the PFO closure (6 of 89) and medical therapy (15 of 45) groups (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.74; p = 0.012). There was no potential heterogeneity in the further subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cryptogenic stroke with PFO and hypercoagulable state had increased risk for recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack. PFO closure provided a lower risk for recurrent events compared with medical therapy alone.

Simultaneous Multifocal Paradoxical Embolism in an Elderly Patient with Patent Foramen Ovale: A Case Report

About one-third of ischemic strokes may be associated with a patent foramen ovale (PFO). This article presents an unusual case of a 68-year-old woman with simultaneous paradoxical thrombo-embolization to different systemic sites. The patient presented initially with visual deficits and intracerebellar hemorrhage but was found to have concomitant saddle pulmonary embolism, sub-acute cerebral infarction with focal neurological deficits, and thromboembolism to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) that resulted in an ischemic bowel. The unifying diagnosis was paradoxical embolism through a PFO and an atrial septal aneurysm with high-risk features. The patient underwent percutaneous closure of the PFO with an Amplatzer device.

Updates in the Management of Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a common neurological disorder and may present with visual symptoms. A thorough workup is warranted to determine the underlying cause of stroke to optimize secondary prevention. Despite a full workup, a high-risk mechanism may not be identified. Optimal treatment in this patient population has been the subject of recent research, particularly with regard to low-risk stroke mechanisms such as patent foramen ovale (PFO).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Using PubMed and published stroke guidelines, an evidence-based literature review was performed.

RESULTS

In this review, we compare cryptogenic stroke with the newer concept of embolic stroke of undetermined source, summarize the most common causes presumed to underlie these strokes, and review the evidence for optimal antithrombotic management. We also review recent clinical trials demonstrating a benefit for percutaneous closure of PFO for secondary stroke prevention in select patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke management is based on evaluation of individual patient-risk factors. Evaluation and treatment is ideally directed by a vascular neurologist to ensure optimal secondary prevention, especially in cases where an underlying etiology is not identified on initial workup.

Patent Foramen Ovale, the Role of Antiplatelet Therapy Alone or Anticoagulant Therapy Alone Versus Device Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Review of the Literature and Current Recommendations

Cryptogenic stroke and its relation to the Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a long-debated topic. Recent clinical trials have unequivocally established the relationship between cryptogenic strokes and paradoxical embolism across the PFO. This slit-like communication exists in everyone before birth, but most often closes shortly after birth. PFO may persist as a narrow channel of communication between the right and left atria in approximately 25-27% of adults. In this review, we examine the clinical relevance of the PFO with analysis of the latest trials evaluating catheter-based closure of PFO's for cryptogenic stroke. We also review the current evidence examining the use of antiplatelet medications versus anticoagulants for stroke prevention in those patients with PFO who do not qualify for closure per current guidelines.

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients older than 60 years of age with cryptogenic embolism

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Randomized trials have shown the efficacy of transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients aged ≤ 60 years with cryptogenic embolism. We aimed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of PFO closure in patients aged> 60 years.

METHODS

Of 475 consecutive patients with cryptogenic embolism who underwent PFO closure, 90 older patients aged> 60 years (mean, 66±5 years) were compared with 385 younger patients aged ≤ 60 years (mean, 44±10 years).

RESULTS

Older patients had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) (hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes; P <.01 for all vs younger patients). There were no differences in periprocedural complications between the 2 groups. During a median follow-up of 8 (4-12) years, there were a total of 17 deaths, all from noncardiovascular causes (7.8% and 2.6% in the older and younger patient groups, respectively; HR, 4.12; 95%CI, 1.56-10.89). Four patients had a recurrent stroke (2.2% and 0.5% in the older and younger patient groups, respectively; HR, 5.08; 95%CI, 0.71-36.2), and 12 patients had a transient ischemic attack (TIA) (3.3% and 2.3% in the older and younger patient groups, respectively; HR, 1.71; 95%CI, 0.46-6.39). There was a trend toward a higher rate of the composite of stroke/TIA in older patients (5.5% vs 2.6%; HR, 2.62; 95%CI, 0.89-7.75; P=.081), which did not persist after adjustment for CVRF (HR, 1.97; 95%CI, 0.59-6.56; P=.269).

CONCLUSIONS

In older patients with cryptogenic embolism, PFO closure was safe and associated with a low rate of ischemic events at long-term. However, older patients exhibited a tendency toward a higher incidence of recurrent stroke/TIA compared with younger patients, likely related to a higher burden of CVRF.

Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale: Randomized Trial Update

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found in about one-quarter of all adults, but the prevalence increases to approximately half of those with a history of a so-called cryptogenic stroke. The true efficacy of PFO closure for prevention of recurrent paradoxical embolism has been debated for years, as the early 3 randomized trials did not show a statistically significant benefit of PFO closure over standard-of-care medical therapy. However, 3 recent randomized trials along with the long-term follow-up data from the largest early trial demonstrated superiority of device closure for secondary stroke prevention.

Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale

Nearly one-half of patients with cryptogenic stroke have a patent foramen ovale (PFO). The dilemma of whether to close these PFOs percutaneously, in an effort to reduce the risk of recurrent paradoxical embolism, has been a matter of ongoing debate for more than a decade. Early randomized clinical trials failed to demonstrate a significant benefit of percutaneous PFO closure for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke in an intention-to-treat analysis. The long-term follow-up data from the RESPECT trial and 2 new randomized trials (CLOSE and REDUCE) have clarified these findings. They showed that with good patient selection, transcatheter PFO closure significantly reduces the risk of recurrent stroke compared with medical therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke, with no increased risk of serious adverse events or influence on major bleeding.

Impact of Discontinuation of Antithrombotic Therapy Following Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Cryptogenic Embolism

No data exist on the optimal duration of antithrombotic therapy (AT) following patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. We sought to assess the safety of AT discontinuation following PFO closure in patients with a cryptogenic ischemic event. A total of 453 consecutive patients (mean age: 48 ± 13years, men: 51%) who underwent PFO closure due to a cryptogenic ischemic event were included. All patients were on AT following PFO closure (antiplatelet therapy: 92.7%, anticoagulation: 7.3%). Ischemic and bleeding events, and AT were assessed at a median follow-up of 8 (IQR: 4 to 11) years, and follow-up was complete in 96% of patients. Stroke and transient ischemic attack occurred in 4 (0.9%) and 12 (2.6%) patients, respectively, and 27 (6.0%) patients had bleeding events (major in 6 [1.3%] patients, including 4 episodes of intracranial hemorrhage). All major bleeding events occurred under aspirin therapy. A total of 82 patients (18%) stopped the AT at a median of 7 (IQR: 5 to 34) months post-PFO closure (due to a bleeding event or gastrointestinal symptoms: 13 patients, no specific reason: 69 patients), and none of them had any ischemic event after a median time of 7 (IQR 3 to 10) years without any AT. A propensity score matched analysis including 46 patients who discontinued the AT within 1-year post-PFO closure and 120 patients with an ongoing AT showed the lack of differences in ischemic events between groups (0 vs 0.2 stroke/transient ischemic attack per 100 patient-years in the no-AT and AT groups, respectively). In conclusion, in young patients who underwent PFO closure, bleeding events occurred in ∼6% of patients after a median follow-up of 8years. AT was discontinued in about one fifth of patients (most of them within the year following PFO closure), and this was not associated with any increase in ischemic events at long-term follow-up. These results suggest that, in patients without other co-morbidities increasing the risk of stroke, temporary AT following PFO closure may be a reasonable strategy.

Meta-analysis of randomized trials on percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for prevention of migraine

BACKGROUND

The role of percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure for prevention of migraine is controversial.

METHODS

We performed a computerised search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases through December 2017 for randomised trials evaluating PFO closure versus control in patients with migraine headaches (with or without aura). The main study outcome was the reduction in monthly migraine attacks after PFO closure compared with the control group.

RESULTS

The final analysis included three randomised trials with a total of 484 patients. Reduction in monthly migraine attacks was higher in PFO closure compared with the control group (standardised mean difference-SMD = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.06-0.43; p = .01). There was higher reduction of monthly migraine days in PFO closure group compared with control group (SMD = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.08-0.53; p = .01). There was no statistically significant difference in complete resolution of migraine attacks (OR: 3.67; 95% CI: 0.66-20.41; p = .14) and in responders' rate (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 0.76-4.85; p = .17) between PFO closure and control groups. In patients whose majority of migraine attacks are with aura, there was an observed reduction in migraine attacks in PFO closure compared with control groups (SMD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.07-1.65; p = .03).

CONCLUSION

PFO closure might be beneficial in migraine patients by reducing migraine attacks and migraine days, especially in patients whose majority of migraine attacks are with aura. However, those benefits were not associated with an improvement in responders' rate or complete resolution of migraine; raising concerns on the magnitude of clinical benefit of PFO closure in migraine prevention.

Percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure during live case demonstrations

BACKGROUND

Live case demonstrations serve as an educational tool for interventional techniques in cardiology. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and technical success of percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure during live case demonstrations.

METHODS

All patients who had undergone percutaneous PFO closure with Amplatzer devices during live case demonstrations at our institution were consecutively included in this retrospective analysis. Procedure related events were compared with summary event rates derived from the eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating PFO closure, as well as with a propensity matched cohort of patients treated under usual conditions.

RESULTS

From April 2004 to June 2015, 142 patients underwent percutaneous PFO closure during live demonstrations, mainly for secondary prevention of cryptogenic cerebrovascular events. The interventions were fluoroscopy guided and successful in all but three cases (2%). Minor adverse events occurred in nine patients (6%). Contrast TEE performed at about 6 months showed complete closure in 84%. No significant differences with regard to technical success and major complications rate were found compared to RCTs, except for an increased rate of minor bleeding observed during live case demonstrations (P for difference < 0.001), mainly attributable to concomitant arterial access for incidental coronary angiography performed in 70% of patients. Except for slightly longer procedure duration, no difference was found compared to a matched population treated under usual conditions.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous PFO closure can be performed during live case demonstrations with the same high technical success as during routine cases.

Percutaneous transcatheter closure of high-risk patent foramen ovale in the elderly

The efficacy of percutaneous transcatheter closure for preventing recurrent cerebrovascular events in elderly patients with high-risk patent foramen ovale (PFO) remains unclear, whereas in young patients, it has been shown to effectively prevent the recurrence of embolic stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous PFO closure in elderly patients with high-risk PFO. Between September 2012 and October 2018, 14 patients ≥ 60 years old with high-risk PFO underwent percutaneous closure to prevent recurrence of cerebrovascular events. The primary end point was recurrence of cerebrovascular events after closure in elderly patients with high-risk PFO, and the secondary end points were occurrence of device-related complications, cerebral hemorrhage, and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). The mean patient age and number of cerebrovascular events before closure were 75.2 ± 6.5 years and 1.7 ± 0.7, respectively. All procedures were successfully performed under general anesthesia by transesophageal echocardiography and using a 25-mm Amplatzer Cribriform device. No procedure-related complications occurred. Patients were followed up for a mean 2.6 ± 1.8 years. No patients experienced device-related complications or recurrent cerebrovascular events. However, one patient had AF-related device closure complications at 1 month postoperatively. In addition, other patient had a cerebral hemorrhage with unknown relationship to PFO closure 3 years postoperatively. Percutaneous closure of high-risk PFO in elderly patients may be as effective and safe as in younger patients. It is crucial to evaluate PFO morphology regardless of age in cases of paradoxical embolism.

Patent Foramen Ovale and Hypoxemia

Patent foramen ovale (PFO), an embryonic remnant of the fetal circulation, is present in 20-25% of adults. Although recent observational studies and clinical trials have established the link between PFO-mediated right-to-left shunting with cryptogenic stroke and migraine with aura, the role of a PFO in exacerbating hypoxemic medical conditions (ie, sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, platypnea-orthodeoxia, pulmonary arteriovenous malformation, high-altitude pulmonary edema, and exercise desaturation) remains less understood. PFO-mediated hypoxemia occurs when deoxygenated venous blood from the right atrium enters and mixes with oxygenated arterial blood in the left atrium. Patients with an intracardiac right-to-left shunt may have profound hypoxemia out of proportion to underlying primary lung disease, even in the presence of normal right-sided pressures. The presence of right-to-left cardiac shunting can exacerbate the degree of hypoxemia in patients with underlying pulmonary disorders. In a subset of these patients, percutaneous PFO closure may result in marked improvement in dyspnea and hypoxemia. This review discusses the association between PFO-mediated right-to-left shunting with medical conditions associated with hypoxemia and explores the role of percutaneous PFO closure in alleviating the hypoxemia.

Are we there yet with patent foramen ovale closure for secondary prevention in cryptogenic stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Background:

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the benefit of patent foramen ovale closure in stroke prevention.

Methods:

We searched Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane central database for randomized control trials assessing the incidence of recurrent stroke after patent foramen ovale closure when compared to medical therapy. Pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. The heterogeneity among studies was tested using the χ² test and inconsistency was quantified using the I² statistic.

Results:

Our search strategy yielded 71 articles. We included five studies with a total of 3440 patients. Median age in the device group was 45 (43, 5.5) years and in the medical group was 45 (44.5, 46) years; 52% were male, 27.7% of patients had an atrial septal aneurysm, 25% had hypertension, and 20.5% had diabetes mellitus. The median follow-up time was 44 (34.5–50) months. The pooled odds ratio of recurrent stroke, transient ischemic attack and composite end point of stroke + transient ischemic attack + peripheral embolism in the patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy group were 0.4 (95% confidence interval 0.25–0.63, I² = 57.5%), 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.61–1.42, I² = 0%), and 0.6 (95% confidence interval 0.44–0.82, I² = 0%), respectively. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was found to be significantly higher in the patent foramen ovale closure group with odds ratio of 6 (95% confidence interval 3.13–11.4, I² = 33.5%). On subgroup analysis, patent foramen ovale closure appeared to benefit males and patients with a large shunt. Number needed to treat to prevent one recurrent stroke with patent foramen ovale closure is 42. Number needed to harm to cause one atrial fibrillation with patent foramen ovale closure is 39.

Conclusion:

This meta-analysis of randomized trials concludes that percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure is effective in recurrent stroke prevention especially in males and in those with a large shunt.

Patent Foramen Ovale: Story Closed?

The optimal treatment strategy for secondary prevention in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been a matter of controversy for decades. After three randomized trials failed to show a benefit of closure with an excess of complications in the interventional arm, two large recent trials suggest a benefit with regard of preventing further ischemic strokes. With this discrepancy in results it is important to discuss recent trials in detail and evolve an informed clinical approach for daily practice.

Secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of our study is to compare patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure versus medical treatment and antiplatelet versus anticoagulant therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) and PFO. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) of randomized trials. Primary outcomes are stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes are peripheral embolism, bleeding, serious adverse events, myocardial infarction and atrial dysrhythmias. We performed an intention to treat meta-analysis with a random-effects model. We include six trials (3677 patients, mean age 47.3 years, 55.8% men). PFO closure is associated with a lower recurrence of stroke or TIA at a mean follow-up of 3.88 years compared to medical therapy [risk ratio (RR) 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81; I² = 40%]. The TSA confirms this result. No difference is found in mortality (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.35-1.60; I² = 0%), while PFO closure is associated with a higher incidence of atrial dysrhythmias (RR 4.55, 95% CI 2.16-9.60; I² = 25%). The rate of the other outcomes is not different among the two groups. The comparison between anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy shows no difference in terms of stroke recurrence, mortality and bleeding. There is conclusive evidence that PFO closure reduces the recurrence of stroke or TIA in patients younger than 60 years of age with CS. More data are warranted to assess the consequences of the increase in atrial dysrhythmias and the advantage of PFO closure over anticoagulants.

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Versus Medical Therapy in Cryptogenic Strokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Cryptogenic strokes account for about 25% to 40% of total ischemic strokes, and 1 of the 3 of these have a patent foramen ovale (PFO). A meta-analysis concerning the effectiveness and safety of PFO closure in cryptogenic strokes or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) was performed. We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through April 2018. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials. Primary and secondary end points were, respectively, stroke or TIA and stroke recurrences. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all end points using fixed- and random-effects meta-analyses. Data were included from 6 trials involving 3560 patients. In the pooled analysis, PFO closure was superior to medical treatment for both primary (RR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.18-0.82; P < .02) and secondary end points (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.44-0.76; P < .001). Transcatheter closure significantly increased the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF; RR: 5.74; P < .001). Percutaneous closure is superior to medical treatment in reducing stroke and TIA recurrence, even if with a significant risk increasing for new-onset AF. These findings suggest that transcatheter closure is indicated in patients with cryptogenic strokes and large PFO.

Patent foramen ovale closure, antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis incorporating complementary external evidence

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relative impact of three management options in patients aged <60 years with cryptogenic stroke and a patent foramen ovale (PFO): PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy, antiplatelet therapy alone and anticoagulation alone.

DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) supported by complementary external evidence.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing PFO closure and/or medical therapies in patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke.

REVIEW METHODS

We conducted an NMA complemented with external evidence and rated certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs in eight studies proved eligible (n=4416). Seven RCTs (n=3913) addressed PFO closure versus medical therapy. Of these, three (n=1257) addressed PFO closure versus antiplatelet therapy, three (n=2303) addressed PFO closure versus mixed antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapies and one (n=353) addressed PFO closure versus anticoagulation. The remaining three RCTs (n=503) addressed anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy. PFO closure versus antiplatelet therapy probably results in substantial reduction in ischaemic stroke recurrence (risk difference per 1000 patients over 5 years (RD): -87, 95% credible interval (CrI) -100 to -33; moderate certainty). Compared with anticoagulation, PFO closure may confer little or no difference in ischaemic stroke recurrence (low certainty) but probably has a lower risk of major bleeding (RD -20, 95% CrI -27 to -2, moderate certainty). Relative to either medical therapy, PFO closure probably increases the risk of persistent atrial fibrillation (RD 18, 95% CI +5 to +56, moderate certainty) and device-related adverse events (RD +36, 95% CI +23 to +50, high certainty). Anticoagulation, compared with antiplatelet therapy, may reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke recurrence (RD -71, 95% CrI -100 to +17, low certainty), but probably increases the risk of major bleeding (RD +12, 95% CrI -5 to +65, moderate certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients aged <60 years, PFO closure probably confers an important reduction in ischaemic stroke recurrence compared with antiplatelet therapy alone but may make no difference compared with anticoagulation. PFO closure incurs a risk of persistent atrial fibrillation and device-related adverse events. Compared with alternatives, anticoagulation probably increases major bleeding.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017081567.

Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: diagnosis and updates in secondary stroke prevention

The patent foramen ovale (PFO), given its high prevalence in the general population and especially in patients with cryptogenic stroke, has long generated investigation and debate on its propensity for stroke by paradoxical embolism and its management for stroke prevention. The pendulum has swung for percutaneous PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention in cryptogenic stroke. Based on a review of current evidence, the benefit from PFO closure relies on careful patient selection: those under the age of 60 years with few to no vascular risk factors and embolic-appearing stroke deemed cryptogenic after thorough evaluation. As these data look towards influencing guideline statements and device approvals in the future, patient selection remains the crucial ingredient for clinical decision making and future trials.

Patent foramen ovale closure vs. medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Aims

The efficacy of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure for cryptogenic stroke has been controversial. We undertook a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing device closure with medical therapy to prevent recurrent stroke for patients with PFO.

Methods and results

We systematically identified all RCTs comparing device closure to medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke in patients with PFO. The primary efficacy endpoint was recurrent stroke, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary safety endpoint was new onset atrial fibrillation (AF). Five studies (3440 patients) were included. In all, 1829 patients were randomized to device closure and 1611 to medical therapy. Across all patients, PFO closure was superior to medical therapy for prevention of stroke [hazard ratio (HR) 0.32, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.13-0.82; P = 0.018, I2 = 73.4%]. The risk of AF was significantly increased with device closure [risk ratio (RR) 4.68, 95% CI 2.19-10.00, P<0.001, heterogeneity I2 = 27.5%)]. In patients with large shunts, PFO closure was associated with a significant reduction in stroke (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.72; P = 0.005), whilst there was no significant reduction in stroke in patients with a small shunt (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.50-1.60; P = 0.712). There was no effect from the presence or absence of an atrial septal aneurysm on outcomes (P = 0.994).

Conclusion

In selected patients with cryptogenic stroke, PFO closure is superior to medical therapy for the prevention of further stroke: this is particularly true for patients with moderate-to-large shunts. Guidelines should be updated to reflect this.

Reduced Stroke After Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent randomized control trials (RCTs) have suggested benefit with transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure plus antiplatelet therapy over medical treatment alone for secondary stroke prevention.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data sources: we searched PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE from the inception until November 10, 2017 for RCTs comparing TPFO closure to medical therapy in patients with a PFO and a history of cryptogenic stroke.

RESULTS

Five RCTs with 3,627 patients (TPFO closure = 1,829 versus medical therapy =1,798) were included. There was a decreased number of post-TPFO closure strokes compared to the medical therapy arm; 53 versus 80 strokes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, CI: 0.39-0.94, P = 0.03, I² = 17%). Transient ischemic attacks occurred in 43 patients after TPFO closure versus 60 patients in the medical therapy group (OR = 0.80, CI: 0.53-1.19, P = 0.26, I² = 0%). There was a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation in the TPFO closure group, which occurred in 75 patients, compared to 12 patients in the medical therapy group (OR = 5.23, CI: 2.17-12.59, P = 0.0002, I² = 43%). There was a trend toward a decreased number of neuropsychiatric events in the TPFO closure closure group compared to the medical therapy group; 42 versus 67 neuropsychiatric events (OR = 0.71, CI: 0.48-1.06, P = 0.09, I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

TPFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy is superior to medical therapy in patients with a PFO and cryptogenic stroke. PFO closure is associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation and a trend toward reduced neuropsychiatric events.