Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Are Ineligible for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

Left Ventricular Outflow Tract and Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Obstruction and TMVR: Predictors, Evaluation, and Solutions

In this issue of Structural Heart, high-impact presentations from Transcatheter Valve Therapies 2023 are reviewed. Dr Jaffar Khan provided updates on the current understanding of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in the field of transcatheter mitral valve replacement, highlighting known predictors of obstruction, a generally agreed-upon strategy for preprocedure assessment, and a host of management strategies in various stages of development and study.

Management strategies and prognosis of patients ineligible for transcatheter mitral valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) faces anatomical challenges, currently limiting widespread adoption.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the natural history and prognosis of patients ineligible for various TMVR devices.

METHODS

During a 4-year period (2019-2023) 3 TMVR devices (SAPIEN M3, Intrepid and Alta Valve) became available at a single institution (The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH) in the setting of pivotal clinical trials or early feasibility study. Consenting patients who were deemed ineligible ≥1 of these trials were prospectively studied to capture anatomical reasons for ineligibility, cross-over to alternative mitral valve therapies (surgery or high-risk mitral transcatheter edge to edge repair [M-TEER]), and clinical events.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients (out of 71 consenting patients or 85.9 %) were deemed ineligible for TMVR during the study period. The mean age was 79.2 ± 8.8 years, 65.6 % were female, with elevated surgical risk (median STS 4.3, IQR: 2.7-7.3). The 2 most common anatomical reasons for ineligibility were increased risk of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) (n = 24, 39.3 %) and annular size (n = 29, 47.5 %). During follow-up (median 277 [162-555] days) there were 7 deaths (11.5 %) and 12 (19.7 %) hospitalizations for heart failure. Management strategies included high-risk M-TEER in 11 patients (1 death [9.0 %], 0 HF hospitalizations [0 %]), surgery in 9 patients (0 deaths, 1 HF hospitalizations [11.1 %]), and medical management in 41 patients (6 deaths [14.6 %], 11 HF hospitalizations [26.8 %]) (p = 0.715 for mortality and p = 0.093 for HF hospitalizations). Residual MR ≥ moderate was 0 %, 50 %, and 100 % for surgery, M-TEER and medical treatment, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

One third of patients deemed ineligible for TMVR are candidates for high-risk M-TEER or surgery with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Our results have practical implications for patient management.

Etiologies and Impact of Exclusion Rates for Transcatheter Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Structural Heart Clinical Trials at a High-Volume Quaternary Care Hospital

There are various devices under clinical investigation for transcatheter mitral valve intervention and transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI); however, the exclusion rates remain high. We aimed to investigate the exclusion rates for transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr), transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr), and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR). There were 129 patients who were referred to St. Francis Hospital & Heart Center valve clinic and completed screening between January 2021 and July 2022. The causes for exclusion were classified into 4 categories: patient withdrawal, anatomic unsuitability, clinical criteria, and medical futility. In 129 patients, the exclusion rates for TMVr, TMVR, TTVr, and TTVR were 81%, 85%, 91%, and 87%, respectively. Patient withdrawal and medical futility were leading etiologies for exclusion, followed by anatomic unsuitability. TMVr had the highest rate of patient withdrawal (64%) and the lowest anatomic unsuitability (5%) because of short posterior leaflet length. Replacement interventions have a higher anatomic unsuitability (33%) than repair interventions (17%) (p = 0.04). Most exclusions of anatomic unsuitability were because of mitral stenosis or small annulus size for TMVR and large annulus size for TTVR. A total of 50% of exclusions from TTVr were because of the presence of pacemaker/defibrillator leads. In patients excluded from their respective trials, patients being referred for TMVr had the highest recurrent hospitalization and repair group had a higher mortality (p <0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, the exclusion rates for transcatheter mitral valve intervention and TTVI trials remain high because of various reasons, limiting patient enrollment and treatment. This supports the need for further device improvement or exploring alternative means of therapy.

Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: patient selection, current devices, and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Over the last two decades, mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has become a safe and effective therapy for severe mitral regurgitation in patients deemed at high surgical risk.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to encompass the most relevant and updated evidence in the field of M-TEER from its inception, focusing on clinical and anatomical features for proper patient and device selection.

EXPERT OPINION

Growing operator experience and device iterations have resulted in improved clinical outcomes and an expansion of the therapy to patients with complex anatomies and clinical scenarios. Future investigations are warranted to determine the best management options and the most suitable device for every patient with MR.

Evolving indications for transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair

Transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is an established procedure for managing mitral regurgitation (MR) in high-risk patients. It is effective in treating both primary and secondary MR, as reported in the surgical and interventional literature. Over time, TEER has gained popularity and achieved procedural success in various anatomies. The less invasive nature of TEER, along with its high safety profile and immediate haemodynamic improvement suggest potential benefits in high-risk populations who are not normally included in major trials. These patients, often deemed unsuitable for surgical intervention, are typically managed conservatively, despite accumulating evidence suggesting the potential of clinical improvement by reducing MR through TEER. Examples include post-myocardial infarction MR, patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and patients experiencing recurrent MR after surgical intervention. This review discusses the utilisation of TEER beyond recognised indications, examining outcomes and limitations in diverse patient populations. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the benefits of TEER in clinical scenarios beyond the current indications.

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation for native valve disease

Mitral regurgitation is the second most frequent heart valve disease in Europe and the most frequent in the US. Although surgery is the therapy of choice when intervention is indicated, transcatheter mitral valve repair or replacement are alternatives for patients who are not eligible for surgery. However, the development of transcatheter mitral valves is slower than expected. Although several transcatheter heart valves have been developed, only one has been commercialised. Indeed, most of these devices are being evaluated in clinical studies, with promising initial results. In this review, we propose an overview on transcatheter mitral valve replacement for the treatment of native mitral valve disease, from indication to results, including patients with severe annular calcification, and we provide you with a glimpse into the future of these therapies.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Transcatheter Aortic Valve or Dedicated Devices: Current Evidence and Future Prospects

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a novel and evolving field dedicated to addressing the therapeutic challenges posed by patients at high surgical risk with mitral valve disease. TMVR can be categorized into two distinct fields based on the type of device and its specific indications: TMVR with transcatheter aortic valves (TAV) and TMVR with dedicated devices. Similar to aortic stenosis, TMVR with TAV requires a rigid support structure to secure the valve in place. As a result, it is indicated for patients with failing bioprothesis or surgical rings or mitral valve disease associated with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC), which furnishes the necessary foundation for valve anchoring. While TMVR with TAV has shown promising outcomes in valve-in-valve procedures, its effectiveness remains more contentious in valve-in-ring or valve-in-MAC procedures. Conversely, TMVR with dedicated devices seeks to address native mitral regurgitation, whether accompanied by MAC or not, providing an alternative to Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER) when TEER is not feasible or expected to yield unsatisfactory results. This emerging field is gradually surmounting technical challenges, including anchoring a valve in a non-calcified annulus and transitioning from the transapical route to the transeptal approach. Numerous devices are presently undergoing clinical trials. This review aims to furnish an overview of the supporting evidence for TMVR using TAV in each specific indication (valve-in-valve, valve-in-ring, valve-in-MAC). Subsequently, we will discuss the anticipated benefits of TMVR with dedicated devices over TEER, summarize the characteristics and clinical results of TMVR systems currently under investigation, and outline future prospects in this field.

Update on Transcatheter Treatment of Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation represents a clinical challenge. They are associated with a poor prognosis, and many patients are not eligible for conventional surgery. Transcatheter therapies have been the focus of numerous studies and devices over the past decade. Here, we provide a summary of current options for transcatheter treatment of these 2 entities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated the benefits of edge-to-edge repair for increasing numbers of patients. Encouraging early results with transcatheter valve replacement are also becoming available. To date, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is currently the first-line transcatheter treatment for both mitral and tricuspid regurgitation for many patients who are not candidates for surgery. A number of transcatheter replacement devices are under development and clinical investigation but, for the most part, their current use is limited to compassionate cases or clinical trials.

Emerging Approaches to Management of Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction Risk in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

An increasing number of patients with mitral valve disease are high risk for surgery and in need of less invasive treatments including transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction is a predictor of poor outcome after TMVR, and its risk can be accurately predicted using cardiac computed tomography analysis. Novel treatment strategies that have shown efficacy in reducing risk of LVOT obstruction after TMVR include pre-emptive alcohol septal ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and anterior leaflet electrosurgical laceration. This review describes recent advances in the management of LVOT obstruction risk after TMVR, provides a new management algorithm, and explores forthcoming studies that will further advance the field.

Contemporary Treatment and Outcomes of High Surgical Risk Mitral Regurgitation

Before the development of transcatheter interventions, patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk were often conservatively treated and subject to poor prognoses. We aimed to assess the therapeutic approaches and outcomes in the contemporary era. The study participants were consecutive high-risk MR patients from April 2019 to October 2021. Among the 305 patients analyzed, 274 (89.8%) underwent mitral valve interventions, whereas 31 (10.2%) received medical therapy alone. Of the interventions, transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral repair (TEER) was the most frequent (82.0% of overall), followed by transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) (4.6%). In patients treated with medical therapy alone, non-optimal morphologies for TEER and TMVR were shown in 87.1% and 65.0%, respectively. Patients undergoing mitral valve interventions experienced less frequent heart failure (HF) rehospitalization compared to those with medical therapy alone (18.2% vs. 42.0%, p < 0.01). Mitral valve intervention was associated with a lower risk of HF rehospitalization (HR 0.36 [0.18-0.74]) and an improved New York Heart Association class (p < 0.01). Most high-risk MR patients can be treated with mitral valve interventions. However, approximately 10% remained on medical therapy alone and were considered as unsuitable for current transcatheter technologies. Mitral valve intervention was associated with a lower risk of HF rehospitalization and improved functional status.

The Clinical Profile and Natural History of Patients Who Fail Screening for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Rationale and Design of the Prospective Multicenter Mitral Valve Screening Survey (MVSS)

Mitral valve disease is insidious and associated with a decreased quality of life and survival over time. Despite surgery being the standard of care, many patients are at prohibitive surgical risk. Furthermore, a substantial proportion of patients with symptomatic mitral valve disease fail stringent screening criteria for transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). The natural history of patients who fail screening is not well-characterized, and data are limited on the reasons for screen failure in this population. The Mitral Valve Screening Survey (MVSS) seeks to detail the clinical profile and natural history of patients who fail screening for TMVR. The MVSS is a prospective, multicenter registry enrolling up to 1000 consecutive subjects who, after screening for TMVR, are deemed not to be candidates. Subjects will be followed for 30 days after failing screening for TMVR and annually for up to 5 years with clinical evaluations. The primary study endpoint of the MVSS registry is all-cause mortality at 1 year. Additional secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, subsequent mitral valve intervention (transcatheter or surgical), reason for screen failure, and quality-of-life assessments at 30 days and annually up to 5 years of follow-up. The MVSS registry is the first prospective multicenter study to characterize the clinical and anatomical profile of patients who fail screening for TMVR while providing longitudinal clarification on the natural history and outcomes of these patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Mitral Valve Screening Survey (MVSS), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04736667, NCT04736667.

Management of patients with mitral regurgitation ineligible for standard therapy undergoing TMVI screening

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) represents a novel treatment alternative for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) considered ineligible for standard therapies. Data on the management of patients after TMVI screening are scarce.

AIMS

We aimed to investigate outcomes of patients with severe MR undergoing TMVI evaluation treated with either TMVI, bailout-transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (bailout-TEER) or medical therapy (MT).

METHODS

Between May 2016 and February 2021, 121 patients with MR considered ineligible for standard therapy were screened for TMVI. Outcomes were assessed for the subgroups of patients treated with TMVI, bailout-TEER and MT. The primary composite endpoint was all-cause death or heart failure hospitalisation after one year.

RESULTS

The subgroups of TMVI (N=38), bailout-TEER (N=28) and MT (N=44) differed significantly with regard to MR aetiology (secondary MR: TMVI 68.4%, bailout-TEER 39.3%, MT 38.6%, p=0.014) and left ventricular ejection fraction (TMVI 37.0% [31.4-51.2], bailout-TEER 48.0% [35.3-58.3], MT 54.5% [40.8-60.0], p<0.001). At discharge and after one year, MR was reduced to ≤mild residual MR in all patients undergoing TMVI, while ≥moderate residual MR was present in 25.9% and 20.0% of patients, respectively, after bailout-TEER, and in 100.0% of patients on MT at one year. The primary endpoint occurred in 72.2% of patients remaining on MT, in 51.6% of patients undergoing TMVI and in 40.2% of those receiving bailout-TEER.

CONCLUSIONS

In MR patients considered ineligible for standard therapy, TMVI provided acceptable clinical outcomes and MR elimination in the majority of patients. In screen-failed patients, bailout-TEER represented a reasonable alternative while MT was associated with poor outcomes.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients screened for transcatheter mitral valve implantation: 1-year results from the CHOICE-MI registry

AIMS

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) represents a novel treatment option for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) unsuitable for established therapies. The CHOICE-MI registry aimed to investigate outcomes of patients undergoing screening for TMVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From May 2014 to March 2021, patients with MR considered suboptimal candidates for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) and at high risk for mitral valve surgery underwent TMVI screening at 26 centres. Characteristics and outcomes were investigated for patients undergoing TMVI and for TMVI-ineligible patients referred to bailout-TEER, high-risk surgery or medical therapy (MT). The primary composite endpoint was all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization after 1 year. Among 746 patients included (78.5 years, interquartile range [IQR] 72.0-83.0, EuroSCORE II 4.7% [IQR 2.7-9.7]), 229 patients (30.7%) underwent TMVI with 10 different dedicated devices. At 1 year, residual MR ≤1+ was present in 95.2% and the primary endpoint occurred in 39.2% of patients treated with TMVI. In TMVI-ineligible patients (n = 517, 69.3%), rates of residual MR ≤1+ were 37.2%, 100.0% and 2.4% after bailout-TEER, high-risk surgery and MT, respectively. The primary endpoint at 1 year occurred in 28.8% of patients referred to bailout-TEER, in 42.9% of patients undergoing high-risk surgery and in 47.9% of patients remaining on MT.

CONCLUSION

This registry included the largest number of patients treated with TMVI to date. TMVI with 10 dedicated devices resulted in predictable MR elimination and sustained functional improvement at 1 year. In TMVI-ineligible patients, bailout-TEER and high-risk surgery represented reasonable alternatives, while MT was associated with poor clinical and functional outcomes.

Imaging in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: State-of-Art Review

Mitral regurgitation is the second-most frequent valvular heart disease in Europe and it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recognition of MR should encourage the assessment of its etiology, severity, and mechanism in order to determine the best therapeutic approach. Mitral valve surgery constitutes the first-line therapy; however, transcatheter procedures have emerged as an alternative option to treat inoperable and high-risk surgical patients. In patients with suitable anatomy, the transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral leaflet repair is the most frequently applied procedure. In non-reparable patients, transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has appeared as a promising intervention. Thus, currently TMVR represents a new treatment option for inoperable or high-risk patients with degenerated or failed bioprosthetic valves (valve-in-valve); failed repairs, (valve-in-ring); inoperable or high-risk patients with native mitral valve anatomy, or those with severe annular calcifications, or valve-in-mitral annular calcification. The patient selection requires multimodality imaging pre-procedural planning to select the best approach and device, study the anatomical landing zone and assess the risk of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. In the present review, we aimed to highlight the main considerations for TMVR planning from an imaging perspective; before, during, and after TMVR.

Open transcatheter valve implantation for mitral annular calcification: One-year outcomes

Background

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) for native mitral valve pathology with severe mitral annular calcification has emerged as an alternative treatment option to conventional mitral valve surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate patients who were referred for TMVI with severe mitral annular calcification and their procedural outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients from 2017 to 2020 referred for TMVI was carried out. Demographic characteristic details; surgical strategy; perioperative complications; and hospital stay, including 30-day and 1-year mortality, were analyzed.

Results

Eleven patients were referred for consideration of TMVI. The 8 patients who underwent TMVI had a median age of 74 years (range, 57-80 years), the median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 4.6 (range, 2.4-10.9), and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score was 5.2% (2%-10.1%). The median cardiopulmonary bypass time and crossclamp times were 170 minutes (range, 150-248 minutes) and 152 minutes (range, 118-214 minutes), respectively. The median hospital stay was 29 days (range, 2-40 days). Thirty-day in hospital mortality was 12%, whereas 1-year mortality was 25%. There was symptomatic improvement with downgrade of New York Heart Association functional class from III or IV to I or II. The 3 patients who were turned down had a median age of 73 years, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 13.4, and median European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score was 5.72%. They were alive at 12 months follow-up from the date of surgical assessment; however, all with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV symptoms.

Conclusions

We describe a series demonstrating the technical consideration and capability of transatrial TMVI to treat mitral annular calcification and native mitral valve disease. Our results are favorable when compared with TMVI global registry data for transseptal or transapical approach.

Current Devices and Complications Related to Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: The Bumpy Road to the Top

Mitral regurgitation is the most common valvular lesion in the developed world, with increasing prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. The experience with surgical mitral valve repair or replacement is very well-validated. However, more than 45% of these patients get denied surgery due to an elevated risk profile and advanced disease of the left ventricle at the time of presentation, promoting the need for less invasive transcatheter options such as transcatheter repair and transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Early available TMVR studies have shown promising results, and several dedicated devices are under clinical evaluation. However, TMVR is still in the early developmental stages and is associated with a non-negligible risk of periprocedural and post-procedural complications. In this review, we discuss the current challenges facing TMVR and the potential TMVR-related complications, offering an overview on the measures implemented to mitigate these complications, and future implications.

Current Status and Future Prospects of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease and, when left untreated, it confers a poorer prognosis. Catheter-based repair therapies face some limitations like their applicability on challenging anatomies and the potential recurrence of significant MR over time. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has emerged as a less invasive approach potentially overcoming some of the current limitations associated with transcatheter mitral valve repair. Several devices are under clinical investigation, and a growing number of systems allow for a fully percutaneous transfemoral approach. In this review, the authors aimed to delineate the main challenges faced by the TMVR field, to highlight the key aspects for procedural planning, and to describe the clinical results of the TMVR systems under clinical investigation. Finally, they also discuss what the future perspectives are for this emerging field.

Reasons for Screen Failure for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement

Despite an expanding armamentarium of devices, many patients with mitral regurgitation referred for transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) or replacement (TMVR) do not meet strict clinical trial inclusion and exclusion criteria. We sought to understand the rates that patients were excluded from transcatheter mitral valve therapies and reasons why. We retrospectively analyzed the medical charts and correspondence related to patients referred to our tertiary valve center for TMVr or TMVR between June 2016 and September 2019. Patients were screened for eligibility by our structural Heart Team for either TMVr or TMVR. If TMVr or TMVR was not offered, the reason for screen failure was recorded and categorized. Over the 3-year period, 564 patients were referred for TMVr and orTMVR. Out of these, 15.9% were determined to be eligible for, and underwent, surgical repair or replacement. Ninety-two patients (16.3%) underwent TMVr or TMVR. The majority of patients (343 of 564, 60.8%) ultimately did not undergo intervention. The primary reason for exclusion was clinical in 38.5%, issues related to patient preference of care delivery in 38.8%, anatomical in 13.7%, and futility in 9.0%. In contemporary real-world practice, the majority of patients with mitral regurgitation referred for transcatheter therapies are excluded. Clinical trials testing new transcatheter devices should be encouraged to record and report reasons for screen failure and follow these patients to better understand optimal timing of intervention, address challenging anatomies, and, ultimately, improve penetrance of these novel therapies.

Role of Cardiac CT in Pre-Procedure Planning for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate cardiac computed tomography (CCT) findings and their clinical impact among patients being considered for transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR).

BACKGROUND

CCT is used to evaluate whether patients are candidates for TMVR, but limited data exist on the yield of such tests.

METHODS

Patients referred for pre-procedural CCT for TMVR planning in the context of failing mitral bioprosthetic valves, annuloplasty rings, and severe native valve disease with annular calcification were included in this study. CCT findings were analyzed to evaluate for suitability for TMVR. In the subset of patients who underwent TMVR, echocardiographic and procedural characteristics were recorded.

RESULTS

Among 80 patients who underwent pre-procedural CCT, the mean age was 71.8 ± 11.4 years, 60% were women, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeon score was 9.4 ± 6.7. Most cases were referred for valve-in-native annular calcification planning (n = 43), followed by valve-in-valve (n = 29), and valve-in-ring procedures (n = 8). A total of 51 (64%) patients did not undergo TMVR, 37 of whom had high-risk features identified on CCT. The most common reason for exclusion was related to large annular size, followed by heightened risk of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. Among 29 patients (36%) who underwent TMVR, the 30-day mortality rate was 17%. Five patients experienced LVOT obstruction, 4 of whom were predicted by CCT. Following TMVR, 5 patients had at least moderate peri-valvular regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS

A minority of patients referred for TMVR planning ultimately undergo the procedure. CCT identifies unsuitable anatomy and leads to exclusion in a significant number of cases.

Natural history observations in moderate aortic stenosis

Background

The natural history of patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) is poorly understood. We aimed to determine the long-term outcomes of patients with moderate AS.

Methods

We examined patients with moderate AS defined by echocardiography in our healthcare system, and performed survival analyses for occurrence of death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and progression of AS, with accounting for symptoms, left ventricular dysfunction, and comorbidities.

Results

We examined 729 patients with moderate AS (median age, 76 years; 59.9 % men) with a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range: 2.0 to 8.1 years). The 5-year overall survival was 52.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 48.6 % to 56.0 %) and survival free of death or HF hospitalization was 43.2 % (95 % CI: 39.5 % to 46.9 %). Worse New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was associated with poor long-term survival, with mortality rates ranging from 7.9 % (95 % CI: 6.6–9.2 %) to 25.2 % (95 % CI: 20.2–30.3 %) per year. Among patients with minimal or no symptoms, no futility markers, and preserved left ventricular function, 5-year overall survival was 71.9 % (95 % CI: 66.4–77.4 %) and survival free of death or HF hospitalization was 61.4 % (95 % CI: 55.5–67.3 %). Risk factors associated with adverse events were age, NYHA class, low ejection fraction and high aortic valve velocity (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Patients with moderate AS are at significant risk of death. Our findings highlight the need for more study into appropriate therapeutic interventions to improve the prognosis of these patients.

LAMPOON techniques to prevent or manage left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in transcatheter mitral valve replacement

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a therapeutic option for patients with severe mitral disease who are deemed inoperable due to their overall surgical risk. The close relationships between the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and the anterior mitral valve leaflet can lead to LVOT obstruction, a common complication with high mortality. Predicting and preventing LVOT obstruction is therefore essential, prior to TMVR. Laceration of the Anterior Mitral leaflet to Prevent Outflow ObtructioN (LAMPOON) is a transcatheter electrosurgical technique to split the anterior mitral valve leaflet immediately prior to TMVR. The technique has been studied in a prospective clinical trial and has evolved with many iterations for specific anatomies. In this review, we discuss the different LAMPOON techniques to prevent and treat LVOT obstruction.

Early results of a real-world series with two transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement devices

Aims

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) with dedicated devices promises to fill the treatment gap between open-heart surgery and edge-to-edge repair for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). We herein present a single-centre experience of a TMVR series with two transapical devices.

Methods and results

A total of 11 patients were treated with the Tendyne™ (N = 7) or the Tiara™ TMVR systems (N = 4) from 2016 to 2020 either as compassionate-use procedures or as commercial implants. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline, discharge and follow-up and are presented in accordance with the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) definitions.

The study cohort [age 77 years (73, 84); 27.3% male] presented with primary (N = 4), secondary (N = 5) or mixed (N = 2) MR etiology. Patients were symptomatic (all NYHA III/IV) and at high surgical risk [logEuroSCORE II 8.1% (4.0, 17.4)]. Rates of impaired RV function (72.7%), severe pulmonary hypertension (27.3%), moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation (63.6%) and prior aortic valve replacement (63.6%) were high. Severe mitral annulus calcification was present in two patients. Technical success was achieved in all patients. In 90.9% (N = 10) MR was completely eliminated (i.e. no or trace MR). Procedural and 30-day mortality were 0.0%. At follow-up NYHA class was I/II in the majority of patients. Overall mortality after 3 and 6 months was 10.0% and 22.2%.

Conclusions

TMVR was performed successfully in these selected patients with complete elimination of MR in the majority of patients. Short-term mortality was low and most patients experienced persisting functional improvement.

Graphic abstract

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-020-01757-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Identification of Subclinical Myocardial Dysfunction and Association with Survival after Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) using edge-to-edge mitral valve clip is effective for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) and high or prohibitive surgical risk. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) allows evaluation of subclinical myocardial dysfunction, but its incremental clinical utility into risk stratification, beyond traditional clinical parameters, is unknown in patients treated with TMVr. We sought to evaluate the association of baseline GLS with 1-year all-cause mortality in patients treated with TMVr using edge-to-edge mitral valve clip.

METHODS

We analyzed 155 patients who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve clip implantation (mean age, 83 ± 7 years; 48% were women; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 56% ± 10%, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score for repair, 6.62% ± 5.22%). Baseline left ventricular GLS was obtained by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography, averaging 18 segments from three apical views. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to assess the GLS cut point associated with all-cause mortality. Multivariable models with Cox regression tested its relationship after adjustment for baseline comorbidities.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 316 days, all-cause deaths occurred in 30 patients at a median of 156 days after TMVr. The area under the curve of preoperative GLS associated with the outcome was 0.60, with a cutoff point of -14.5%. Baseline GLS > -14.5% was associated with 1-year mortality (hazard ratio = 2.50; 95% CI, 1.20-5.21; P = .02) before and after adjustment for baseline characteristics. After accounting for baseline characteristics, patients with GLS > -14.5% had worse 1-year mortality than those with GLS ≤ -14.5% (χ²P < .001). In nested Cox proportional hazards models, the addition of baseline GLS to Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score, left ventricular ejection fraction, and the etiology of MR significantly increased the model χ² value (χ² = 12.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline GLS is independently associated with 1-year all-cause mortality in patients who undergo TMVr, and its assessment improves risk stratification in these patients.

Screening for transcatheter mitral valve replacement: a decision tree algorithm

AIMS

The high frequency of screening failure for anatomical reasons in patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is a limiting factor in the screening process for transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). However, data on optimal patient selection are scarce. The present study aimed to develop a screening algorithm based on TMVR screening data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 195 screenings for six different TMVR devices were performed in 94 high-risk patients with severe MR. We compared baseline echocardiographic and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) parameters between the subgroups of patients accepted (N=33) and rejected for TMVR (N=61). Reasons for screening failure were assessed, and a decision tree algorithm was statistically derived. Reasons for screening failure were small LV dimensions (30.6%), small (7.5%) or large (22.5%) annular size, potential risk of LVOT obstruction (22.0%) or mitral annulus calcification (15.6%). A four-step decision tree algorithm to assess TMVR eligibility was developed resulting in an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.89, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents the first screening algorithm to assess anatomical eligibility for TMVR in patients with severe MR, based on simple MSCT criteria. Given the high rate of TMVR screening failure, this algorithm may facilitate the identification of potential TMVR candidates.