On- Versus Off-Hours Presentation and Mortality of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Impact of off-hours admissions in STEMI-related cardiogenic shock managed with microaxial flow pump - insights from J-PVAD

BACKGROUND

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) is associated with high mortality rates. Patients admitted during off-hours, specifically on weekends and at night, show higher mortality rates, which is called the "off-hours effect". The off-hours effect in patients with STEMI-CS treated with mechanical circulatory support, especially Impella, has not been fully evaluated.

AIMS

We aimed to investigate whether off-hours admissions were associated with higher mortality rates in this population.

METHODS

We used large-scale Japanese registry data for consecutive patients treated with Impella between February 2020 and December 2021 and compared on- and off-hours admissions. On- and off-hours were defined as the time between 8:00 and 19:59 on weekdays and the remaining time, respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 1,207 STEMI patients, 566 (46.9%) patients (mean age: 69 years; 107 females) with STEMI-CS treated with Impella were included. Of these, 300 (53.0%) were admitted during on-hours. During the follow-up period (median 22 days [interquartile range 13-38 days]), 112 (42.1%) and 91 (30.3%) deaths were observed among patients admitted during off- and on-hours, respectively. Off-hours admissions were independently associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality than on-hours admissions (aHR 1.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-2.39; p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicated the persistence of the "off-hours effect" in STEMI-CS patients treated with Impella. Healthcare professionals should continue to address the disparities in cardiovascular care by improving the timely provision of evidence-based treatments and enhancing off-hours medical services.

Timing of Complete Revascularization Stratified by Index Presentation During On- and Off-Hours

Recent trials suggested immediate complete revascularization (ICR) as a safe alternative to staged complete revascularization (SCR), but the impact of the respective percutaneous coronary intervention strategies between on- versus off-hours is unclear. On-hours was defined as an index revascularization performed between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, or else the procedure was defined as performed during off-hours. The primary end point consisted of a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, and cerebrovascular events at 1-year follow-up. We used Cox regression models to relate randomized treatment with study end points. We evaluated multiplicative and additive interactions between on- versus off-hours and randomized treatment. The BIOVASC (Percutaneous Complete Revascularization Strategies Using Sirolimus Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Coated Stents in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Multivessel Disease) trial enrolled 1,097 and 428 patients during on- and off-hours, respectively. Patients randomized during off-hours were more likely to present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (66.4% vs 29.5%, p <0.001). The composite primary outcome occurred in 8.4% and 10.1% of patients randomized to ICR and SCR, respectively, during on-hours (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 1.19). During off-hours, the primary composite outcome occurred in 5.4% and 7.7% in ICR and SCR (0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 1.46) with no evidence of a differential effect (interaction pmultiplicative = 0.70, padditive = 0.56). No differential effect was found between treatment allocation and on- versus off-hours in any of the secondary outcomes. In conclusion, no differential treatment effect was found when comparing ICR versus SCR in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease during on- or off-hours.

Outcome of Patients Managed by Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation During On-Hours and Off-Hours

Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pVADs) may be used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) to stabilize hemodynamics and maintain sufficient end-organ perfusion. Vascular complications are commonly observed in patients with pVAD support. We aimed to assess the relationship between pVAD implantation time and access-site complication rates. This retrospective observational study included all patients who underwent pVAD insertion for the treatment of CS at our university hospital between 2014 and 2021 (n = 224). Depending on the pVAD insertion time, the patients were assigned to the on-hours (n = 120) or off-hours group (n = 104). Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics and comorbidities. The rate of access-site-related complications was higher in the off-hours group than in the on-hours group (26% vs. 10%, p = 0.002). Premature discontinuation of pVAD support to prevent limb ischemia or manage access-site bleeding was required more often in the off-hours group than in the on-hours group (14% vs. 5%, p = 0.016). Pre-existing peripheral artery disease and implantation time off-hours were independent predictors for access-siterelated vascular complications. In conclusion, patients with CS in whom pVAD was inserted during off-hours had higher rates of access-site-related complications and premature discontinuation of pVAD support than those in whom pVAD was inserted during on-hours.

Effect of Admission and Onset Time on the Prognosis of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND

The spectrum of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) has changed significantly over time. CS has become especially more common in the absence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), while this subset of patients was typically excluded from recent studies. Furthermore the prognostic impact of onset time and onset place due to CS has rarely been investigated.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do the place of CS onset (out-of-hospital, ie, primary CS vs in-hospital, ie, secondary CS) and the onset time of out-of-hospital CS (ie, on-hours vs off-hours admission) affect the risk of all-cause mortality at 30 days?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This prospective monocentric registry included consecutive patients with CS of any cause from 2019 until 2021. First, the prognostic impact of the place of CS onset (out-of-hospital, ie, primary CS vs during hospitalization, ie, secondary CS) was investigated. Thereafter, the prognostic impact of the onset time of out-of-hospital CS was investigated. Furthermore, the prognostic impact of causative AMI vs non-AMI was investigated. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier analyses, and univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-three patients with CS were included prospectively (64% with primary out-of-hospital CS). The place of CS onset was not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality within the entire study cohort (secondary in-hospital CS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.532; 95% CI, 0.990-2.371; P = .06). However, increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality was seen in patients with AMI related secondary in-hospital CS (HR, 2.087; 95% CI, 1.126-3.868; P = .02). Furthermore, primary out-of-hospital CS admitted during off-hours was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to primary CS admitted during on-hours (HR, 0.497; 95% CI, 0.302-0.817; P = .01), irrespective of the presence or absence of AMI.

INTERPRETATION

Primary and secondary CS were associated with comparable, whereas primary out-of-hospital CS admitted during off-hours was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality at 30 days.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05575856; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Risk-adjusted management in catheterization procedures for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A standard operating procedure pilot study

BACKGROUND

The effects of standardized risk-adjusted periprocedural management of cardiac catheterization procedures in Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remain unknown. We implemented a standard operating procedure (SOP) specifying risk assessment (RA, using National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) risk models) and risk-adjusted management (RM, e.g. intensified monitoring) in 2018 and aimed to investigate staff SOP adherence and associations with patient outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All 430 invasively managed NSTEMI patients (mean age 72y; 70.9% male) in 2018 were analyzed for staff SOP adherence and in-hospital clinical outcomes. 207 patients (48.1%; RM+) received both RA and RM; 92 patients (21.4%; RM-) received RA but no RM; 131 patients (30.5%; RA-) received neither RA nor RM. Lower staff adherence to RA was associated with emergency settings (51.9% (RA-) vs. 22.1% (RA+); p<0.01), presentation in cardiogenic shock (17.6% (RA-) vs. 6.4% (RA+); p<0.01) and invasive mechanical ventilation (12.2% (RA-) vs. 3.3% (RA+); p<0.01). Early sheath removal (87.9% (RM+) vs. 56.5% (RM-); p<0.01) and intensified monitoring (p<0.01) were more frequent in the RM+ group. All-cause mortality was not different (1.4% (RM+) vs. 4.3% (RM-); p=0.13), but there were fewer major bleeding events with associated with RM (2.4% (RM+) vs. 12% (RM-); p<0.01), which remained independently associated with RM in a multivariate logistic regression model correcting for confounders (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

In an all-comer patient cohort with NSTEMI, staff adherence to risk-adjusted periprocedural management was independently associated with fewer major bleeding events. Staff adherence to SOP-specified risk assessment was frequently neglected in more critical clinical situations.

Effect of Admission and Discharge Times on Hospital Mortality in Patients With Sepsis

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the time of admission/discharge time from the ICU and weekend admission are independently associated with hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis.

DESIGN

Retrospective study. Each 24-hour period (08:00 to 07:59 hr) was split into three time periods, defined as "day" (08:00 to 16:59 hr), "evening" (17:00 to 23:59 hr), and "night" (00:00 to 07:59 hr). Weekends were defined as 17:00 hours on Friday to 07:59 hours on Monday. Multivariate logistic regression models were conducted to assess the association between the ICU admission/discharge time, weekend admission, and hospital mortality.

SETTING

Single-center ICUs in China.

PATIENTS

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of 1,341 consecutive septic patients admitted to the emergency ICU, general ICU, or cardiovascular ICU in a tertiary teaching hospital were collected.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

ICU mortality rates were 5.8%, 11.9%, and 10.6%, and hospital mortality rates were 7.3%, 15.6%, and 17.1% during the day, evening, and night time, respectively. Hospital mortality was adjusted for patient to nurse (P/N) ratio, disease severity, Charlson index, age, gender, mechanical ventilation, and shock. Notably, ICU admission time and weekend admission were not predictors of mortality after adjustment. The P/N ratio at admission was significantly associated with mortality ( p < 0.05). The P/N ratio and compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) were significantly correlated. After risk adjustment for illness severity at time of ICU discharge and Charlson index, the time of discharge was no longer a significant predictor of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

ICU admission/discharge time and weekend admission were not independent risk factors of hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis. The P/N ratio at admission, which can affect the compliance rate with SSC, was a predictor of hospital survival. Unstable state on transfer from the ICU was the main risk factor for in-hospital death. These findings may have implications for the management of septic patients.

Association of Admission Time and Mortality in STEMI Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were admitted during off-hours and treated with primary angioplasty associated with an increased risk of mortality compared with those admitted during regular working hours. We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, SCOPUS, Europe PMC, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases that was finalized on March 15, 2021. The primary outcome was mortality comprising early (in-hospital), midterm (30 days to 1 year), and long-term mortality (>1 year). A total of 384,452 patients from 56 studies were included. The overall mortality of acute STEMI patients admitted during off-hours and regular hours were 6.1 and 6.7%, respectively. Patients admitted during off-hours had similar risk of early, midterm, and long-term mortality compared to those admitted during regular working hours ([relative risk or RR = 1.07, 95% confidence interval or CI, 1.00-1.14, p  = 0.06; I 2  = 45%, p  = 0.0009], [RR = 1.00, 95% CI, 0.95-1.05, p  = 0.92; I 2  = 13%, p  = 0.26], and [RR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.86-1.04, p  = 0.26; I 2  = 0%, p  = 0.76], respectively). Subgroup analyses indicated that the results were consistent across all subgroups ([women vs. men], [age >65 years vs. ≤65 years], and [Killip classification II to IV vs. Killip I]). Funnel plot was asymmetrical. However, Egger's test suggests no significance of small-study effects ( p  = 0.19). This meta-analysis showed that patients with acute STEMI who were admitted during off-hours and treated with primary angioplasty had similar risk of early, midterm, and long-term mortality compared with those admitted during regular working hours.

Evaluating the cardioprotective effect of metformin on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury using dynamic 18F-FDG micro-PET/CT imaging

BACKGROUND

The molecular mechanisms of protective effect of metformin (Met) on ischemic myocardium have not been fully understood. This study aims to evaluate the cardioprotective effect of metformin on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) in rat models at different time points using dynamic 18F-FDG micro-PET/CT imaging.

METHODS

The I/R injury model in SD rats was established by ligation of left anterior descending coronary artery near the pulmonary arch root for 30 min. SD rats (n = 12) were randomly divided into 2 groups: Control group (n = 6) without any intervention and Met group (n = 6) with oral administration of metformin (50 mg/kg) twice a day. Gated 18F-FDG (40Mbq) micro-PET/CT imaging was performed for 10 min at different time points (day 1st, day 7th, day 14th and day 30th after operation). Volumes of interest were drawn to identify different myocardium regions (ischemia center, peri-ischemia area and remote area). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) (SUVmean and SUVmax) were analyzed to evaluate the FDG uptake activity, and then the center/remote ratio was calculated. In addition, the left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were obtained. On the 30th day, all rats were scarified and myocardial ischemia was analyzed by HE staining and confirmed by pathology.

RESULTS

In the Control group, the center/remote ratio showed no obvious change trend at each time point after reperfusion, while the LV EDV increased gradually over time, and they were significantly negatively correlated (r = - 0.507, p < 0.05). In the Met group, the center/remote ratio gradually increased with time, there was no significant correlation between center/remote ratio and LV EDV (r = - 0.078, p > 0.05). On the 30th day, the center/remote ratio of the Met group was significantly higher than that of the Control group (0.81 ± 0.06 vs. 0.65 ± 0.09, p < 0.05), while LV EDV in Met group was significantly lower than in Control group (358.21 ± 22.62 vs. 457.53 ± 29.91, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference of LVEF between Met group and Control group at different time points after reperfusion (p < 0.05). HE staining showed that the myocardial infarction and fibrosis in ischemic center area of the Control group was more serious than that of the Met group.

CONCLUSIONS

Met could attenuate the severity of MIRI, delay and prevent the progress of LV remodeling. The cardioprotective progress could be dynamically assessed by 18F-FDG micro-PET/CT imaging.

Off-hour presentation and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction with Killip III-IV

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is conventionally recognized as an urgent medical condition requiring timely and effective reperfusion therapy. However, the results of studies on the clinical outcomes in AMI according to hospital visit timings are inconclusive. To explore the difference in long-term outcomes between off- and on-hour percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with AMI of Killip functional classification III-IV (Killip III-IV AMI).

METHODS

Data on the characteristics and clinical outcomes of 1,751 patients with Killip III-IV AMI between November 2011 and June 2015 from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health registry were analyzed. All participants were allocated into two groups: off-hour (weekdays from 6:00 PM to 8:00 AM, weekends, and legal holidays) and on-hour (weekdays from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM) groups. The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, any revascularization, cerebrovascular accident, and stent thrombosis, was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Among the 1,751 patients, 572 (39.1%) underwent PCI during on-hours and 892 (60.9%) during off-hours. At the 3-year follow-up, no significant difference was found in the clinical outcomes between the two groups in both the unadjusted and propensity-score weighing-adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of patients with Killip III-IV AMI admitted during off- and on-hours were similar.

Long-term outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated according to hospital visit time

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Rapid percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the cornerstone of treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there have been conflicting results regarding the differences in clinical outcomes between on-hours and off-hours presentation in STEMI patients. We aimed to examine the difference in long-term outcomes between off-hours and on-hours PCI in patients with STEMI.

METHODS

The characteristics and clinical outcomes of 5,364 STEMI patients between November 2011 and June 2015 from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health (KAMIR-NIH) registry were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: the off-hours group (weekdays from 6:01 PM to 7:59 AM, weekends, and legal holidays) and the on-hours group (weekdays from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were defined as a composite of allcause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, any revascularization, cerebrovascular accident, and stent thrombosis. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of MACCEs, and all other clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 3,119 patients (58.1%) underwent primary PCI due to STEMI during off-hours and 2,245 patients (41.9%) during on-hours. At 36 months, the clinical outcomes of the off-hours group were similar to those of the on-hours group in both the unadjusted and propensity score weighting-adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis revealed that the long-term outcomes in STEMI patients admitted to hospitals during off-hours were similar to outcomes of those admitted during on-hours.

Association Between Out-of-Hour Admission and Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: Out-of-hour admission (on weekends, holidays, and weekday nights) has been associated with higher mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We conducted a meta-analysis to verify the association between out-of-hour admission and mortality (both short- and long-term) in AMI patients.

Design: This Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Data Sources: PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to 27 May 2021.

Eligibility Criteria for Selected Studies: Studies of any design examined the potential association between out-of-hour admission and mortality in AMI.

Data Extraction and Synthesis: In total, 2 investigators extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias. Analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. The results are shown as odds ratios [ORs] with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). I² value was used to estimate heterogeneity. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was used to assess the certainty of the evidence.

Results: The final analysis included 45 articles and 15,346,544 patients. Short-term mortality (defined as either in-hospital or 30-day mortality) was reported in 42 articles (15,340,220 patients). Out-of-hour admission was associated with higher short-term mortality (OR 1.04; 95%CI 1.02–1.05; I² = 69.2%) but there was a significant statistical indication for publication bias (modified Macaskill's test P < 0.001). One-year mortality was reported in 10 articles (1,386,837 patients). Out-of-hour admission was also associated with significantly increased long-term mortality (OR 1.03; 95%CI 1.01–1.04; I² = 66.6%), with no statistical indication of publication bias (p = 0.207). In the exploratory subgroup analysis, the intervention effect for short-term mortality was pronounced among patients in different regions (p = 0.04 for interaction) and socio-economic levels (p = 0.007 for interaction) and long-term mortality was pronounced among patients with different type of AMI (p = 0.0008 for interaction) or on different types of out-to-hour admission (p = 0.006 for interaction).

Conclusion: Out-of-hour admission may be associated with an increased risk of both short- and long-term mortality in AMI patients.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020182364).

Effect of the Timing of Admission of Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction on Management and Outcome

There is limited data regarding the impact of time of admission on clinical outcomes of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We investigated the patient characteristics, management, and outcomes of OHCA complicating AMI according to the time of admission. Patients admitted with a diagnosis of AMI and OHCA between 2010 and 2017 from the Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project (MINAP) were studied. All patients were stratified into out-of-hours (OOH) and working hours (WH) cohort according to the time of hospital admission. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the predictors of clinical outcomes and treatment strategy. 16,118 patients were admitted with AMI and OHCA. The WH cohort consisted of 5,780 patients (35.9%) and OOH cohort consisted of 10,338 patients (64.1%). The OOH cohort was younger (OOH 64 vs WH 66 years, p <0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients had a final diagnosis of STEMI in OOH cohort (OOH 78.3% vs WH 76.6%, p = 0.012). Whilst the use of coronary angiography was lower in OOH (OOH 80.7% vs WH 82.5%, p = 0.005), PCI rates were similar (OOH 39.7% vs WH 40.5%, p = 0.4). Adjusted in-hospital mortality (OR 0.96, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.07), re-infarction (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.12) and bleeding (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.12) were similar in the 2 groups. In conclusion, the majority of OHCA occurred out of working hours. However, the time of hospital admission didn't affect the rate of revascularization by PCI or clinical outcomes.

Percutaneous coronary intervention during on- and off-hours in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

There are conflicting data on the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) based on the time of admission to the catheterization laboratory. Thus, we aimed to assess clinical outcomes in an unselected cohort of consecutive patients with STEMI treated with PCI during on-and-off hours of work.

METHODS

A total of 99,783 patients were included in the analysis. Patients were divided using the most frequently used definition: On-hours (Monday-Friday 07:00 AM-04:59 PM); off-hours (Monday-Friday 05:00 PM-06:59 AM, Saturday, Sunday, and nonworking holidays) (37,469 matched pairs). To avoid potential preselection bias, a propensity score was calculated to compare on-and-off hour groups.

RESULTS

Higher radiation doses were observed for PCIs performed during off-hours (1055.2(±1006.5) vs. 1081.6(±1003.25)[mGy] and p = 0.001). A similar prevalence of periprocedural complications was observed during on- and off-hours. However, there was a higher mortality rate during off-hours than during regular working hours (1.17% (439) vs. 1.49% (559) and p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary PCIs in STEMI performed during off-hours might be associated with a higher rate of periprocedural mortality and higher radiation doses than procedures conducted during regular working hours.

Procedural Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During Normal Work Hours Versus Non-work Hours

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed during non-work hours is believed to have inferior outcomes because of operator fatigue, differences in baseline patient characteristics, and fewer on-call catheterization laboratory staff. We aimed to analyze a cohort of patients who underwent PCI (all comers) at our tertiary-care center between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2018, and compare procedural and in-hospital outcomes between 2 groups defined by whether PCI was performed during normal work hours (7:00 A.M. to 7:00 PM) versus non-work hours (7:01 P.M. to 6:59 A.M. weekdays; all hours weekends and holidays). Finally, we examined temporal changes throughout the 24-hour weekday. Primary outcomes were unadjusted in-hospital adverse outcomes (composite death, recurrent myocardial infarction, emergent coronary artery bypass grafting, and target lesion revascularization). We identified 21,848 patients who underwent PCI at our institution. The proportions of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) were higher during non-work hours. Overall, unadjusted in-hospital adverse outcomes were higher during non-work hours than during normal work hours (8.80% vs 2.00%; p <0.001). These findings were consistent based on the patient's clinical presentation (STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina, and stable angina). Despite confounding variables in the patients' presentations preventing definite causal attribution, our analysis demonstrates that in-hospital adverse outcomes were higher for those patients who underwent PCI (all comers) who had their procedures during non-work hours than during normal work hours.

Effects of ON-Hours Versus OFF-Hours Admission on Outcome in Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: Results From the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is highly complex, and outcomes may depend on the time of hospital admission and subsequent intervention (ie, ON-hours versus OFF-hours). The CULPRIT-SHOCK trial (Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) demonstrated superior outcome for culprit-lesion-only versus immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, multivessel disease, and cardiogenic shock. However, it is unknown whether the time of hospital admission affects the overall outcome of these high-risk patients.

METHODS

We analyzed patients from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial with respect to the time of hospital admission. We divided patients in ON-hours and OFF-hours groups and further stratified them according to their individual revascularization strategy. Outcome measures consisted of a composite end point of death or renal-replacement therapy within 30 days and mortality within 1 year.

RESULTS

Out of 686 patients randomized in the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, 444 patients (64.7%) presented during ON-hours, whereas 242 patients (35.3%) presented during OFF-hours. Death or renal-replacement therapy at 30 days occurred to a similar extent in patients admitted during ON-hours (51.0%) and OFF-hours (50.0%; P=0.80). Similarly, 1-year mortality was not affected by the time of hospital admission (54.4% ON-hours versus 51.7% OFF-hours, P=0.49). Regardless of admission time, patients had a benefit from culprit-lesion-only as compared to immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. The composite end point at 30 days occurred in 45.1% versus 57.6% of patients admitted ON-hours and in 47.7% versus 51.9% of patients admitted OFF-hours (P_interaction=0.29). Death within 1 year occurred in 49.4% versus 60.0% of patients admitted during ON-hours and in 51.4% versus 51.9% of patients admitted OFF-hours (P_interaction=0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, the risk of death or renal-replacement therapy at 30 days, and mortality at 1 year did not differ significantly according to the time of hospital admission. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01927549.

Association of the long fluoroscopy time with factors in contemporary primary percutaneous coronary interventions

BACKGROUND

Since the long fluoroscopy time in primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) could be an indicator of delayed reperfusion, it should be important to recognize which types of lesions require longer fluoroscopy-time in primary PCI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of the long fluoroscopy-time with clinical factors in primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

METHODS

A total of 539 patients who underwent primary PCI were divided into the conventional fluoroscopy-time group (Q1-Q4: n = 434) and the long fluoroscopy-time group (Q5: n = 105) according to the quintile of the total fluoroscopy time in primary PCI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to find associations between clinical variables and the long fluoroscopy-time.

RESULTS

In univariate logistic regression analysis, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hemodialysis, and previous CABG were significantly associated with the long fluoroscopy-time. In addition, complex lesion characteristics such as lesion length, lesion angle, tortuosity, and calcification were associated with the long fluoroscopy-time. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, lesion length [per 10 mm incremental: odds ratio (OR) 1.751, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.397-2.195, P<0.001], moderate-excessive tortuosity (vs. mild tortuosity: OR 4.006, 95% CI 1.498-10.715, P = 0.006), and moderate to severe calcification (vs. none-mild calcification: OR 1.865, 95% CI 1.107-3.140, P = 0.019) were significantly associated with the long fluoroscopy-time.

CONCLUSIONS

In primary PCI for STEMI, diffuse long lesion, tortuosity, and moderate-severe calcification were associated with the long fluoroscopy-time. These complex features require special attention to reduce reperfusion time in primary PCI.

Evaluation of sex differences in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction: an observational cohort study in Amsterdam and surrounding region

Introduction

Women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) present with different symptoms compared to men. This can result in delays in diagnosis and in the timely treatment of women. The aim of this study is to examine these differences, including the short- and long-term mortality in women and men.

Methods

This quality registry study included all patients with STEMI who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 2015 or 2016 in Amsterdam and the surrounding region.

Results

Three PCI centres and the Emergency Medical Service in Amsterdam participated. In total, 558 men (71%) and 229 women (29%) were included. Women were on average 7 years older than men (68 vs 61 years, p < 0.001), and suffered more often from hypertension (46% vs 34%, p = 0.002) and monovascular disease (69% vs 57%, p = 0.002). A higher percentage of men were current smokers (41% vs 49%, p = 0.043). Patient delay, system delay and overall ischaemic times were similar in both women and men (medians: 51, 94 and 157 min, respectively). Initiation of treatment was achieved within 90 min after STEMI diagnosis in 85% of patients (87% in women, 85% in men). Thirty-day and 1‑year mortality adjusted hazard ratio for women versus men was 1.60 (95% CI 0.9–3.0) and 1.24 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), respectively.

Discussion

Recognition of cardiac complaints remains challenging for patients. In the Amsterdam region, time delays and mortality were not significantly different between men and women presenting with STEMI. These results are in contrast to findings in similar registries. This suggests that implementation of current knowledge and national campaigns are effective in increasing awareness of the signs and symptoms suggestive of myocardial infarction.

Weekend Effect in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000-2016

Objective

To assess the effects of weekend admission vs weekday admission on the management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods

Adult ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) hospital admissions were identified using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (2000-2016). Interhospital transfers were excluded. Timing of coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) relative to the day of admission was identified. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, receipt of early CA, timing of CA and PCI, resource utilization, and discharge disposition for weekend vs weekday admissions.

Results

Of the 9,041,819 AMI admissions, 2,406,876 (26.6%) occurred on weekends. Compared with 2000, in 2016 there was an increase in weekend STEMI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16; P<.001) but not NSTEMI (aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.98-1.02; P=.21) admissions. Compared with weekday admissions, weekend admissions received comparable CA (59.9% vs 58.8%) and PCI (38.4% vs 37.6%) and specifically lower rates of early CA (hospital day 0) (26.0% vs 20.8%; P<.001). There was a steady increase in CA and PCI use during the 17-year period. Mean ± SD time to CA was higher in the weekend group vs the weekday group (1.2±1.8 vs 1.0±1.8 days; P<.001). Weekend admission did not influence in-hospital mortality (aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; P=.05) but had fewer discharges to home (58.7% vs 59.7%; P<.001).

Conclusion

Despite small differences in CA and PCI, there were no differences in in-hospital mortality of AMI admissions on weekdays vs weekends in the United States in the contemporary era.