Optimal Strategy for Antiplatelet Therapy After Endovascular Revascularization for Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

Medical Optimization of Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive disease associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events and elevated mortality rates. Symptoms of PAD, including claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia, impair functional capacity and lead to lower quality of life. The focus of current therapies is to minimize symptoms, improve quality of life, and reduce adverse cardiovascular and limb events. Among the medical therapies are antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antihypertensives, lipid lowering therapies, cilostazol and pentoxifylline, and novel blood sugar-lowering therapies, plus exercise therapy and smoking cessation. In this review, we discuss these evidence-based medical therapies that are available for patients with symptomatic PAD.

2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

Practice patterns of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

Antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy are commonly prescribed after fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR). However, the optimal regimen remains unknown. We sought to characterize practice patterns and outcomes of antiplatelet and anticoagulant use in patients who underwent F/BEVAR.

METHODS

Consecutive patients enrolled (2012-2023) as part of the United States Aortic Research Consortium (US-ARC) from 10 independent physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies were evaluated. The cohort was characterized by medication regimen on discharge from index F/BEVAR: (1) Aspirin alone OR P2Y12 alone (single-antiplatelet therapy [SAPT]); (2) Anticoagulant alone; (3) Aspirin + P2Y12 (dual-antiplatelet therapy [DAPT]); (4) Aspirin + anticoagulant OR P2Y12 + anticoagulant (SAPT + anticoagulant); (5) Aspirin + P2Y12 + anticoagulant (triple therapy [TT]); and (6) No therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to compare 1-year outcomes including survival, target artery patency, freedom from bleeding complication, freedom from all reinterventions, and freedom from stent-specific reintervention.

RESULTS

Of the 1525 patients with complete exposure and outcome data, 49.6% were discharged on DAPT, 28.8% on SAPT, 13.6% on SAPT + anticoagulant, 3.2% on TT, 2.6% on anticoagulant alone, and 2.2% on no therapy. Discharge medication regimen was not associated with differences in 1-year survival, bleeding complications, composite reintervention rate, or stent-specific reintervention rate. However, there was a significant difference in 1-year target artery patency. On multivariable analysis comparing with SAPT, DAPT conferred a lower hazard of loss of target artery patency (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.84; P = .01). On sub-analyses of renal stents alone or visceral stents alone, DAPT no longer had a significantly lower hazard of loss of target artery patency (renal: HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.35-1.27; P = .22; visceral: HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.05-1.9; P = .21). Lastly, duration of DAPT therapy (1 month, 6 months, or 1 year) did not significantly affect target artery patency.

CONCLUSIONS

Practice patterns for antiplatelet and anticoagulant regimens after F/BEVAR vary widely across the US-ARC. There were no differences in bleeding complications, survival or reintervention rates among different regimens, but higher branch vessel patency was noted in the DAPT cohort. These data suggest there is a benefit in DAPT therapy. However, the generalizability of this finding is limited by the retrospective nature of this data, and the clinical significance of this finding is unclear, as there is no difference in survival, bleeding, or reintervention rates amongst the different regimens. Hence, an "optimal" regimen, including the duration of such regimen, could not be clearly discerned. This suggests equipoise for a randomized trial, nested within this cohort, to identify the most effective antiplatelet/anticoagulant regimen for the growing number of patients being treated globally with F/BEVAR.

Optimizing platelet inhibition in peripheral artery disease: A comparison of mono-antiplatelet therapy and dual-antiplatelet therapy using thromboelastography

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy is used to prevent thrombosis in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) following revascularization. However, the current standard of care for these patients remains at the physician's discretion, varying from mono-antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) to dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Viscoelastic assays such as Thromboelastography with Platelet Mapping (TEG-PM) provide insight into individual coagulation profiles and measure real-time platelet function. This prospective, observational study looks at the differences in platelet function for patients on MAPT versus DAPT using TEG-PM.

METHODS

Patients with PAD undergoing revascularization were prospectively evaluated between December 2020 and June 2023. TEG-PM analysis compared platelet function for patients prescribed MAPT (aspirin or clopidogrel) at the initial encounter and DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) at the next visit. Platelet function measured in percent inhibition was evaluated at these visits, and within-group t-tests were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 195 patients enrolled, 486 samples were analyzed by TEG-PM. Sixty-four patients met the study criteria. At the initial visit, 52 patients had been prescribed aspirin, and 12 patients had been prescribed clopidogrel. For patients initially prescribed aspirin MAPT, an increase of 96.8%in the mean ADP platelet inhibition was exhibited when transitioning to DAPT [22.0% vs. 43.3%, p < .01], as well as an increase of 34.6%in the mean AA platelet inhibition when transitioning to DAPT [60.9% vs. 82.0%, p < .01]. For patients prescribed initial clopidogrel MAPT, an increase of 100% in AA platelet inhibition was exhibited on DAPT compared to the MAPT state [42.3% vs. 84.6%, p < .01].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on DAPT showed a significant increase in platelet inhibition when compared to initial aspirin MAPT. A significant difference in AA %platelet inhibition was shown for patients on DAPT when compared to initial clopidogrel MAPT. The results show that patients may benefit from DAPT post-revascularization. Personalizing antiplatelet therapy with objective viscoelastic testing to confirm adequate treatment may be the next step in optimizing patient outcomes to reduce thrombosis in PAD patients.

Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia is a Residual Bleeding Risk Factor among Patients with Lower Extremity Artery Disease

AIM

Lower-extremity artery disease (LEAD) is a high-risk factor for bleeding. However, the specific risk factors for bleeding in patients with LEAD remain unclear. We aimed to identify risk factors for bleeding in patients with LEAD after endovascular treatment (EVT).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included 732 consecutive patients with LEAD who underwent EVT between January 2018 and December 2019. Patient characteristics, laboratory data, target lesions, and medications were compared between patients with and without chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Predictive bleeding risk factors were explored using Cox regression analysis with differential models.

RESULTS

In model 1, a body mass index (BMI) ＜18.5 kg/m2, prior heart failure, high bleeding risk, use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) plus warfarin, and CLTI were predictive bleeding risk factors (hazard ratio [HR] 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-3.52; p＜0.01; HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.28-3.55; p＜0.01; HR 3.40; 95% CI 1.28-3.55; p＜0.01; HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.33-5.84; p＜0.01; respectively). In model 2, a BMI ＜18.5 kg/m2, prior heart failure, anemia (＜11 g/dL), low platelet count (＜10*104/µL), chronic kidney disease, use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) plus warfarin, and CLTI were independent risk factors for bleeding (model 2: HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.12-3.56; p=0.02; HR 2.35; 95% CI 1.39-3.90; p＜0.01; HR 2.71; 95% CI 1.64-4.50; p＜0.01; HR 2.66; 95% CI 1.00-5.89; p=0.05; HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.25-5.45; p＜0.01; HR 2.79; 95% CI 1.24-5.63; p=0.01; respectively) Conclusions: CLTI is a residual and predictive risk factor for bleeding in patients with LEAD. We have to pay attention to the bleeding events of patients with CLTI after EVT during follow-up.

Effect of Cilostazol on Patients With Diabetes Who Underwent Endovascular Treatment for Peripheral Artery Disease

Background No large-scale study has compared the clinical impact of triple antiplatelet therapy (TAPT: aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on adverse limb events in patients with diabetes after endovascular therapy (EVT) for peripheral artery disease. Thus, we investigate the effect of cilostazol added to a DAPT on the clinical outcomes after EVT in patients with diabetes using a nationwide, multicenter, real-world registry. Methods and Results A total of 990 patients with diabetes who underwent EVT were enrolled from the retrospective cohorts of a Korean multicenter EVT registry and were divided according to the antiplatelet regimen (TAPT [n=350; 35.4%] versus DAPT [n=640; 64.6%]). After propensity score matching based on clinical characteristics, a total of 350 pairs were compared for clinical outcomes. The primary end points were major adverse limb events, a composite of major amputation, minor amputation, and reintervention. For the matched study groups, the lesion length was 125.4±102.0 mm, and severe calcification was observed in 47.4%. The technical success rate (96.9% versus 94.0%; P=0.102) and the complication rate (6.9% versus 6.6%; P>0.999) were similar between the TAPT and DAPT groups. At 2-year follow-up, the incidence of major adverse limb events (16.6% versus 19.4%; P=0.260) did not differ between the 2 groups. However, the TAPT group showed less minor amputation than the DAPT group (2.0% versus 6.3%; P=0.004). In multivariate analysis, TAPT was an independent predictor of minor amputation (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.354 [95% CI, 0.158-0.794]; P=0.012). Conclusions In patients with diabetes undergoing EVT for peripheral artery disease, TAPT did not decrease the incidence of major adverse limb events but may be associated with a decreased risk of minor amputation.

Validation of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria in patients undergoing peripheral endovascular interventions

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria could apply to peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT).

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the application of the ARC-HBR criteria to PAD patients undergoing EVT with contemporary drug-coated devices (DCD) for femoropopliteal artery lesions.

METHODS

Between May 2012 and December 2019, 542 consecutive patients undergoing EVT with DCD for femoropopliteal artery lesions were retrospectively analysed. The primary study endpoint was major bleeding events, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5.

RESULTS

Of 542 patients, 435 (80.3%) were stratified into the HBR group. The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding events was significantly higher in the HBR group than in the non-HBR group (31.9% vs 2.3%; p<0.001). The 5-year major bleeding event rate gradually increased with the number of ARC-HBR criteria (≥2 major criteria: 48.6%, 1 major: 33.1%, ≥2 minor: 12.9%, and non-HBR: 2.3%; p<0.001). Major bleeding events were associated with a 5.4-fold increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 5.42, 95% confidence interval: 2.91-10.1; p<0.001). Severe chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and severe anaemia were predictors of major bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS

80.3% of PAD patients undergoing EVT for femoropopliteal artery lesions with contemporary drug-coated devices met the ARC-HBR criteria. Given that major bleeding events remarkably increased the risk of mortality after EVT, the ARC-HBR criteria might be helpful for the risk stratification of PAD patients who undergo EVT with contemporary DCD.

Use of Thromboelastography with Platelet Mapping to Identify Prothrombotic Coagulation Profiles in Patients with History of Cardiac Intervention Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization

BACKGROUND

Patients with concomitant coronary and peripheral artery disease (CAD and PAD) are at significant risk for major adverse limb events (MALEs). Prevention of thrombosis in this population is of paramount importance. Identifying prothrombotic coagulation profiles in this cohort may facilitate targeted thromboprophylaxis. We compared coagulation profiles of those with CAD and PAD to those with PAD alone during the perioperative period of lower extremity revascularization.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization underwent thromboelastography-platelet mapping (TEG-PM) analysis preoperatively and at serial intervals for up to 6 months. Coagulation profiles of patients with significant CAD (defined as history of coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention) and PAD were compared with those with PAD alone. MALE in the postoperative period was recorded.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-seven TEG-PM samples from 114 patients were analyzed; 28.1% had a history of significant CAD. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was higher in this group. The significant CAD group had lower ADP-platelet inhibition, higher ADP-platelet aggregation, and greater maximum clot strength compared with patients with PAD alone. Patients with significant CAD were more frequently on full-dose anticoagulation, but less frequently on dual antiplatelet therapy; 28.1% of patients with significant CAD developed postoperative MALE compared with 22.9% of patients with PAD alone (p = 0.40). For both groups, patients who developed postoperative MALE demonstrated greater ADP-platelet aggregation and lower ADP-platelet inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a history of significant CAD undergoing lower extremity revascularization demonstrated prothrombotic TEG-PM profiles, less frequent use of dual antiplatelet therapy, and greater rates of full-dose anticoagulation. Decreased platelet inhibition was also associated with postoperative MALE. This study underscores the potential utility of viscoelastic assays for coagulation profiling in complex cardiovascular patients.

Antithrombotic therapy following revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia: a European survey from the ESC Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases

Aims

Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) entails dismal outcomes and is an absolute indication to lower extremity revascularization (LER) whenever possible. Antithrombotic therapy is here crucial, but available evidence on best strategies (choice of drugs, combinations, duration) is scarce. We conducted a European internet-based survey on physicians’ use of antithrombotic therapy after revascularization for CLTI, under the aegis of the ESC Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Disease in collaboration with other European scientific societies involved in CLTI management and agreeing to send the survey to their affiliates.

Methods and results

225 respondents completed the questionnaire. Antithrombotic therapy following surgical/endovascular LER varies widely across countries and specialties, with dedicated protocols reported only by a minority (36%) of respondents. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is the preferred choice for surgical (37%) and endovascular (79%) LER. Dual pathway inhibition (DPI) with aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban is prescribed by 16% of respondents and is tightly related to the availability of reimbursement (OR 6.88; 95% CI 2.60–18.25) and to the choice of clinicians rather than of physicians performing revascularization (OR 2.69; 95% CI 1.10–6.58). A ≥ 6 months-duration of an intense (two-drug) postprocedural antithrombotic regimen is more common among surgeons than among medical specialists (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.10–3.94). Bleeding risk assessment is not standardised and likely underestimated.

Conclusion

Current antithrombotic therapy of CLTI patients undergoing LER remains largely discretional, and prescription of DPI is related to reimbursement policies. An individualised assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risks is largely missing.

Impact of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy on 10-Year Mortality after Revascularization for Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the long-term impact of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) on 10-year mortality in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) after revascularization.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicentre study enrolle 459 patients with CLTI who underwent revascularization (396 endovascular therapy [EVT] and 63 bypass surgery [BSX] cases) between January 2007 and December 2011. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. We additionally explored the predictors for all-cause mortality using Cox regression hazard models; the influence of GDMT, defined as prescription of antiplatelet agents, statins, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in aggregate, on all-cause mortality, and the association between baseline characteristics using interaction effects.

RESULTS

During the 10-year follow-up after revascularization, 234 patients died. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, 10-year mortality was significantly lower in patients who received statins (p＜.001) and ACE inhibitors or ARBs (p=.010) than those who did not. However, there were no differences in 10-year mortality between patients who received anti-platelet agents and those who did not (p=.62). Interaction analysis revealed that GDMT had a significantly different hazard ratio in patients who were and were not on hemodialysis and in those treated with EVT or BSX (p for interaction =.002 and .044, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, age ＞75 years, non-ambulatory status, hemodialysis, congestive heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ＜50%, and GDMT were significantly associated with all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate GDMT use was independently associated with 10-year mortality in patients with CLTI after revascularization.

Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Agents in Peripheral Arterial Interventions

Effective revascularization of peripheral artery disease relies on periprocedural pharmacological regulation of the clotting cascade. Patient-specific factors such as cardiovascular risk factors, contraindications, and individual psychosocial factors must be considered when initiating post revascularization management. Management with anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents is discussed to guide the interventionalist on which therapy may be appropriate for their patient. While exact treatment may be institution and provider dependent, the interventionist must be familiar with the available classes of medications and how they can be prescribed in the postprocedural setting to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Cardiovascular and Limb Events Following Endovascular Revascularization Among Patients ≥65 Years Old: An American College of Cardiology PVI Registry Analysis

Background We aimed to characterize the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events (MACE and MALE) among patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), as well as associated factors in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). Methods and Results Patients undergoing PVI in the American College of Cardiology's (ACC) National Cardiovascular Data Registry's PVI Registry who could be linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data were included. The primary outcomes were MACE, MALE, and readmission within 1 month and 1 year following index CLTI-PVI or non-CLTI-PVI. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with the development of the primary outcomes among patients undergoing CLTI-PVI. There were 1758 (49.7%) patients undergoing CLTI-PVI and 1779 (50.3%) undergoing non-CLTI-PVI. By 1 year, MACE occurred in 29.5% of patients with CLTI (n=519), and MALE occurred in 34.0% of patients with CLTI (n=598). By 1 year, MACE occurred in 8.2% of patients with non-CLTI (n=146), and MALE occurred in 26.1% of patients with non-CLTI (n=465). Predictors of MACE at 1 year in CLTI-PVI included end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, congestive heart failure, prior CABG, and severe lung disease. Predictors of MALE at 1 year in CLTI-PVI included treatment of a prior bypass graft, profunda femoral artery treatment, end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, and treatment of a previously treated lesion. Conclusions Patients ≥65 years old undergoing PVI experience high rates of MACE and MALE. A range of modifiable and non-modifiable patient factors, procedural characteristics, and medications are associated with the occurrence of MACE and MALE following CLTI-PVI.

P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy is Associated with Superior Outcomes as Compared to Aspirin Monotherapy in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Antiplatelet therapy is recommended in patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) to reduce cardiovascular risk and improve outcomes. However, issues including the drug of choice and use of dual antiplatelet (DAPT) vs monotherapy remain unclear. This study aims to compare the impact of aspirin (ASA) monotherapy, P2Y12 monotherapy and DAPT on limb salvage (LS), amputation-free survival (AFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing lower extremity peripheral endovascular intervention (PVI) for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI registry was used to identify index procedures completed for CLTI between 3/1/2010- 09/30/2017. Patients were categorized by antiplatelet use at the time of last follow-up. Patients not on antiplatelet therapy were compared with ASA, P2Y12 monotherapy and DAPT. Propensity score matched (PSM) samples were created for direct ASA vs P2Y12 and P2Y12 vs DAPT comparisons; veracity was confirmed by Chi-Square and Hosmer-Lemeshow. Kaplan Meier and Cox regression were performed for OS, AFS and LS.

RESULTS

12,433 index PVI were completed for CLTI in 11,503 subjects in the pre-matched sample. Antiplatelet use at follow-up was: 12% none, 31% ASA, 14% P2Y12 and 43% DAPT. Median FU was 1389 days. P2Y12 monotherapy was associated with improved outcomes as compared to ASA monotherapy, OS (87.8% vs 85.5%, P=.026; Cox HR 0.82(0.68-0.98); P= .03), AFS (79.6% vs74.8%, P<.001; Cox HR 0.75(0.65-0.86); P < .001) and LS (89.5% vs 86.8%, P= .013; Cox HR 0 .74(0.60-0.91); P= .004). P2Y12 monotherapy and DAPT had comparable OS (87.8% vs 88.9%, P= .62; Cox HR 0.94(0.77-1.14); P= .50), AFS (79.6% vs 81.5%, P= .33; Cox HR 0.92(0.78-1.07); P= .28) and LS (91.7% vs 89.4, P=.03; Cox HR 0.80 (0.64-1.00); P= .06).

CONCLUSIONS

P2Y12 monotherapy was associated with superior overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS) and limb salvage (LS) as compared to ASA monotherapy, and comparable OS, LS and AFS to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing peripheral endovascular interventions for chronic limb threatening ischemia. P2Y12 monotherapy may be considered over ASA monotherapy and DAPT in CLTI patient, especially in patients at high bleeding risk.

Mono or Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Treating Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease after Lower Extremity Revascularization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) after lower-limb intervention remains controversial. Currently, the prescription of DAPT after an intervention is not fully recommended in guidelines due to limited evidence. This study compares and analyzes the prognosis for symptomatic PAD patients receiving DAPT versus monotherapy after lower-limb revascularization. Up to November 2021, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies reporting the efficacy, duration, and bleeding complications when either DAPT or monotherapy were used to treat PAD patients after revascularization. Three randomized controlled trials and seven nonrandomized controlled trials were included in our study. In total, 74,651 patients made up these ten studies. DAPT in PAD patients after intervention was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79−0.94; p < 0.01), major adverse limb events (HR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47−0.78; p < 0.01), and major amputation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64−0.96) when follow-up was for more than 1-year. DAPT was not associated with major bleeding events when compared with monotherapy (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.69−2.18; p = 0.50) but was associated with a higher rate of minor bleeding as a complication (OR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.59−4.08; p < 0.01). More prospective randomized studies are needed to provide further solid evidence regarding the important issue of prescribing DAPT.

Management of chronic peripheral artery disease patients with indication for endovascular revascularization

With an increasing global burden of patients with chronic peripheral artery disease (PAD) the safe and effective provision of lower limb revascularisation is a growing medical need. Endovascular procedures for the treatment of PAD have become a crucial cornerstone of modern vascular medicine, and the first line revascularisation approach if technically feasible and taking patient choice into consideration. With the increasing age of patients with PAD and the increasing number of comorbidities open vascular surgery is also often not feasible. We outline a framework of key messages, endorsed by the board of the European Society of Vascular Medicine for pre-, peri- and post procedural management of patients requiring endovascular arterial procedures of the lower limbs. These key messages emphasize the important and increasing role of interventional vascular physicians.

Major Adverse Events in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease after Endovascular Revascularization: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

For peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients, after endovascular revascularization, it is crucial to manage associated factors that can affect the risk of major adverse events. We aimed to investigate the associated factors of major adverse events in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective longitudinal analysis using the electronic medical records from a tertiary hospital in Korea and included the data of 1263 patients. Eligible patients were categorized into four groups based on diabetes mellitus (DM) and regular exercise. The major adverse events included major adverse limb events and major adverse cardiovascular events. Major adverse events-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and associated factors of major adverse events were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analyses.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients with DM and non-regular exercise had a shorter major adverse events-free survival. The Cox regression analysis showed that for patients with critical limb ischemia or chronic kidney disease, the risk of major adverse events increased, while group variables were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Target management of patients with DM, critical limb ischemia, and chronic kidney disease is essential to reduce major adverse events after endovascular revascularization in patients with PAD.

Impact of Statin Treatment Intensity after Endovascular Revascularization on Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

PURPOSE

Only a few Asian studies have discussed the impact of statin intensity on clinical outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). We aimed to investigate the clinical impact of statin intensity in patients with PAD after endovascular revascularization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2009 to June 2019, 376 patients with lower extremity PAD treated with endovascular revascularization were enrolled. They were classified into three groups according to statin intensity: no-statin, low-to-moderate intensity (LMI), and high-intensity (HI). The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE).

RESULTS

During the 40-month follow-up, MACE occurred less frequently in the HI and LMI groups than the no-statin group (11.4% vs. 16.0% vs. 39%, p<0.001). In adjusted Cox models, the HI group had the fewest MACE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.447; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.244-0.834; p=0.018] and MALE (HR: 0.360; 95% CI: 0.129-1.006; p=0.051) events, while the LMI group had fewer MACE (HR: 0.571; 95% CI: 0.326-1.0; p=0.050) events than the no-statin group. HI statin therapy was associated with better outcomes in terms of MALE (HR: 0.432; 95% CI: 0.223-0.837; p=0.003) than LMI statin therapy after inverse probability treatment weighting analysis.

CONCLUSION

HI and LMI statin use is associated with a significant reduction in MACE events than no-statin use. HI statin use was associated with better MALE outcomes than no-statin or LMI statin use.

Principal predictors of major adverse limb events in diabetic peripheral artery disease: A narrative review

Background and aims

The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus is causing a massive growth of peripheral artery disease incidences, a disabling complication of diabetic atherosclerosis, which leads often to the amputation of the affected limb. Critical limb ischemia is the terminal disease stage, which requires a prompt intervention to relieve pain and save limbs. However, patients undergoing revascularization often suffer from cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and major adverse limb events with poor outcomes. Furthermore, the same procedure performed in apparently similar patients has various outcomes and lack of an outcome predictive support causes a high lower limb arterial revascularization rate with disastrous effects for patients. We collected the main risk factors of major adverse limb events in a more readable and immediate format of the topic, to propose an overview of parameters to manage effectively peripheral artery disease patients and to propose basics of a new predictive tool to prevent from disabling vascular complications of the disease.

Methods

Most recent and updated literature about the prevalence of major adverse limb events in peripheral artery disease was reviewed to identify possible main predictors.

Results

In this article, we summarized major risk factors of limb revascularization failure and disabling vascular complications collecting those parameters principally responsible for major adverse limb events, which provides physio-pathological explanation of their role in peripheral artery disease.

Conclusion

We evaluated and listed a panel of possible predictors of MALE (Major Adverse Limb Event) in order to contribute to the development of a predictive score, based on a summary of the main risk factors reported in scientific articles, which could improve the management of peripheral artery disease by preventing vascular accidents.

Antithrombotic therapies in aortic and peripheral arterial diseases in 2021: a consensus document from the ESC working group on aorta and peripheral vascular diseases, the ESC working group on thrombosis, and the ESC working group on cardiovascular pharmacotherapy

The aim of this collaborative document is to provide an update for clinicians on best antithrombotic strategies in patients with aortic and/or peripheral arterial diseases. Antithrombotic therapy is a pillar of optimal medical treatment for these patients at very high cardiovascular risk. While the number of trials on antithrombotic therapies in patients with aortic or peripheral arterial diseases is substantially smaller than for those with coronary artery disease, recent evidence deserves to be incorporated into clinical practice. In the absence of specific indications for chronic oral anticoagulation due to concomitant cardiovascular disease, a single antiplatelet agent is the basis for long-term antithrombotic treatment in patients with aortic or peripheral arterial diseases. Its association with another antiplatelet agent or low-dose anticoagulants will be discussed, based on patient's ischaemic and bleeding risk as well therapeutic paths (e.g. endovascular therapy). This consensus document aims to provide a guidance for antithrombotic therapy according to arterial disease localizations and clinical presentation. However, it cannot substitute multidisciplinary team discussions, which are particularly important in patients with uncertain ischaemic/bleeding balance. Importantly, since this balance evolves over time in an individual patient, a regular reassessment of the antithrombotic therapy is of paramount importance.

The Role for Combined Antithrombotic Therapy With Platelet and Coagulation Inhibition After Lower Extremity Revascularization

Evidence for antithrombotic treatment following lower extremity revascularization (LER) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is limited, leading to weak and conflicting guideline recommendations and heterogeneous practice patterns. This variability in post-LER antithrombotic treatment raises quality-of-care issues that have long been under-studied. This Viewpoint reviews the most updated guidelines, currently-available evidence, and contemporary data about practice patterns and practitioner opinions in this area. Particular attention is paid to distinctions between antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, and combination therapy in light of the recent VOYAGER-PAD (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [acetylsalicylic acid] Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for PAD) trial. The implications of VOYAGER-PAD pertaining to various subgroups of patients undergoing LER are explored. Overall, this Viewpoint argues for consideration of post-LER therapy targeted at both platelet function and the coagulation cascade, though further LER-specific analyses, including expected VOYAGER-PAD sub-analyses, are needed.

Patients with failed femoropopliteal covered stents are more likely to present with acute limb ischemia than those with failed femoropopliteal bare metal stents

OBJECTIVE

Covered stents (CS) to treat superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease have become more common. However, concerns about patients presenting with acute limb ischemia (ALI) after failure due to coverage of important collaterals have been raised. Herein, we determine if CS are associated with ALI after failure.

METHODS

Vascular Quality Initiative peripheral vascular intervention and infrainguinal bypass datasets were queried from 2010 to 2020 for patients who underwent SFA stenting with a bare metal stent (BMS) or CS and who also had a subsequent ipsilateral SFA endovascular reintervention or bypass recorded in the Vascular Quality Initiative. The initial SFA stenting procedure will be referred to as the index procedure and the subsequent procedure will be referred to as the reintervention. Patients with aneurysmal pathology, prior infrainguinal bypass, and ALI at the index procedure were excluded. Patients with pre-index inflow/outflow procedures were not excluded. The primary outcome was ALI at reintervention. Other outcomes included higher degree of ischemia (claudication vs rest pain vs tissue loss vs ALI) and reoperative factors. Predictors of the primary outcome were determined with multivariable logistic regression. The index treatment length and pre-index ankle-brachial index were forced into the model.

RESULTS

There were 3721 patients: 3338 with index BMS, 383 with index CS. The mean patients age was 66.3 ± 11.0 years and 59.2% were male. Baseline covariates were similar between the groups; during the index procedure, more patients with BMS underwent plain balloon angioplasty (68.7% vs 62.1%; P = .001) and had shorter total index treatment length (median, 15.0 cm [interquartile range, 10.0-25.0 cm] vs 20.0 cm [interquartile range, 12.0-30.0 cm]; P < .001). At reintervention, ALI was the presenting symptom for 12.0% of the CS cohort vs 6.3% of the BMS cohort (P < .001). More patients with an index CS underwent major amputation at the time of reintervention (2.6% vs 1.0%; P = .006). Reinterventions for the patients with a CS more often used bypass, pharmacologic thrombolysis, and mechanical thrombolysis. CS at the index procedure was a predictor of ALI at reintervention (odds ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.65; P = .001) while controlling for age, time difference between procedures, body mass index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, preoperative anticoagulation and antiplatelet, prior carotid intervention and major amputation, index procedure fluoroscopy time and treatment length, and pre-index ankle-brachial index.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing reintervention for failed SFA stents, CS are more likely to present with ALI than those with failed SFA BMS.

Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Infrainguinal Endovascular Treatment for Peripheral Arterial Disease

After infrainguinal endovascular treatment for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), it is uncertain whether single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) should be preferred. This study investigated major adverse limb events (MALE) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between patients receiving SAPT and DAPT. Patient data from three centers in the Netherlands were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All patients treated for PAD by endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral, popliteal, or below-the-knee (BTK) arteries and who were prescribed acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel, were included. End points were 1-, 3-, and 12-month MALE and MACE, and bleeding complications. In total, 237 patients (258 limbs treated) were included, with 149 patients receiving SAPT (63%) and 88 DAPT (37%). No significant differences were found after univariate and multivariate analyses between SAPT and DAPT on 1-, 3-, and 12-month MALE and MACE, or bleeding outcomes. Subgroup analyses of patients with BTK treatment showed a significantly lower 12-month MALE rate when treated with DAPT (hazard ratio 0.33; 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.95; p = 0.04). In conclusion, although patient numbers were small, no differences were found between SAPT and DAPT regarding MALE, MACE, or bleeding complications. DAPT should, however, be considered over SAPT for the subgroup of patients with below-the-knee endovascular treatment.

Antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy after revascularization for lower extremity artery disease: a national survey and literature overview

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy (APT) after interventions for lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) is recommended. However, (inter)national guidelines vary on type and duration of APT. This report aimed to present the results of a survey on antithrombotic prescribing patterns after lower limb interventions in the Netherlands and an overview of the available literature on this topic.

METHODS

Vascular surgeons from the Dutch Society for Vascular Surgery and interventional radiologists from the Dutch Society for Interventional Radiology received an online survey on the type and duration of antithrombotic medication after lower limb interventions.

RESULTS

Surveys were completed by 139 of 285 vascular surgeons (49%) and 24 of 288 (8%) interventional radiologists. Clopidogrel was the most prescribed drug after iliac percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (77%), femoral PTA (77%), femoral PTA with drug-coated balloon (66%), and femoropopliteal (80%) and femorocrural (51%) prosthetic bypasses. Dual APT (DAPT), consisting of aspirin and clopidogrel, was most often prescribed after femoral PTA with stenting (56%) and crural PTAs (55% without stent, 73% with stent). Vitamin K antagonists were most often prescribed after femoropopliteal (83%) and femorocrural (80%) venous bypasses. Aspirin monotherapy prescription varied from 1% to 8% after interventions. Many interventional radiologists responded that they only advise in medication prescription but do not prescribe themselves.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescription of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy in LEAD patients after femoral and crural interventions varies widely among Dutch vascular surgeons, mostly between clopidogrel and DAPT. The duration of DAPT is also highly variable. These results reflect low-level evidence and discrepancy in current guideline recommendations.

Discharge Prescription Patterns for Antiplatelet Therapy Following Lower Extremity Peripheral Vascular Intervention

BACKGROUND

Despite current guidelines suggesting a benefit for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), there are limited data on antiplatelet prescribing patterns post-procedure. We attempted to determine variables associated with DAPT prescription following lower extremity PVI.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing lower extremity PVI in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2017-2018) was performed. Participants not on anticoagulation or DAPT before the procedure were considered for the final analysis. Postdischarge antiplatelet therapy regimen rates were determined (none, aspirin only, P2Y12 inhibitor only, and DAPT). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine variables associated with DAPT initiation compared with those discharged on single-agent or no antiplatelet therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 16 597 procedures were included for analysis, with 49% initiated on DAPT post-PVI. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.12 [95% CI, 1.05-1.20]), smoking (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.09-1.32]), and coronary artery disease (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.11-1.27]) were associated with an increased likelihood of post-PVI DAPT prescription. Procedures requiring multiple types of interventions (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.15-1.42]), stent placement (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.06-1.27]), and with complications (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.14-1.52]) were also positively associated with DAPT prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients not already receiving anticoagulation or on DAPT at the time of lower extremity PVI, prescription of DAPT following intervention is ≈50%. Multiple factors were associated with the decision for DAPT versus single antiplatelet therapy, and further study is required to understand how this affects postintervention adverse limb and cardiovascular events.