Effect of Residual Interatrial Shunt on Migraine Burden After Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale

Association of in situ thrombus within the patent foramen ovale and patients with migraine: A prospective cohort study

Background

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with migraine; however, the mechanism of PFO-associated migraine is not well known; additionally, percutaneous closure is controversial. This study aimed to investigate in situ thrombi within the PFO and explore the possible predictors of the effectiveness of PFO closure in migraineurs.

Methods

This prospective cohort study included 48 asymptomatic patients and 92 migraineurs with PFO. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to evaluate the PFO microstructure. Only migraineurs underwent percutaneous closure. Migraineurs were divided into two cohorts based on the presence of a thrombus within the PFO. The symptoms were assessed at the 12-month follow-up visit. Predictors were evaluated employing multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.

Results

In situ thrombi within PFO were identified in 69 migraineurs and in two asymptomatic patients (76.7 % vs. 4.3 %; P < 0.001). Additionally, endocardial irregularity, discontinuity, low signal, and spasm were found in 59 (65.6 %), 15 (16.7 %), 13 (14.4 %), and six (6.7 %) patients, respectively, in the migraine group. In situ thrombus was associated with migraine risk (OR 49.03; 95%CI 8.52-282.18; P < 0.001). At the 12-month follow-up of the migraineur cohort, the primary endpoint, a 50 % reduction in migraine frequency after closure (with or without thrombus in PFO) was met (85.3 % vs. 25.0 %; P < 0.001). In situ thrombus was associated with migraine relief (OR 6.75; 95%CI 1.28-35.56; P = 0.024).

Conclusions

In situ thrombus and abnormal endocardium within PFOs were common in migraineurs, and in situ thrombus was a risk factor for migraine. Percutaneous closure was more effective in migraineurs with thrombi within the PFO. OCT imaging improved the understanding of pathogenic PFOs and may be helpful in selecting suitable migraineurs for PFO closure.

Every Patent Foramen Ovale Should Be Closed

At present, the patent foramen ovale (PFO) does not receive the deserved medical attention. The PFO poses a serious threat to health and even the life of mankind. The first respective case report in the medical literature dates back to the 19th century. It led to death. The fact that a PFO is present in roughly 25% of people underscores its overall potential to cause harm. Yet at the same time, the sheer number discourages the medical community from screening for it and from treating it. About 5% of the population have particularly dangerous forms of PFOs. Such PFOs portray a high enough risk for clinical events, the likes of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or ocular, visceral, and peripheral embolism, to justify screening for them. Highly significant health incidents being at stake, it appears obvious that PFO closure should be used for primary prevention. This is supported by the fact that closing a PFO is the simplest intervention in cardiology, with presumably the highest clinical yield. Being mainly a preventive measure, PFO closure represents a mechanical vaccination. When closing PFOs for one of the rarer therapeutic indications (migraine, platypnea orthodeoxia, etc.), patients automatically profit from the collateral benefit of getting, at the same time, mechanically vaccinated for life against paradoxical embolism. Vice versa, closing a PFO for the prevention of paradoxical embolism betters or cures migraine or exercise dyspnea not infrequently, thereby improving quality of life as a collateral benefit.

Rationale and design of the SPRING trail: effectivity and safety of Pfo closuRe vs medIcine in alleviatiNg migraine, a multicenter, randomized and open-label trail

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Several retrospective studies have suggested that the closure of the Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) may provide relief from migraines. However, three randomized controlled trials did not meet their primary endpoints regarding migraine cessation, reduction in monthly migraine days, and responder rates.

METHODS

The SPRING study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, and open-label trial designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PFO closure versus medication in the relief of migraines. The primary endpoint is the total cessation of migraines, as recorded in patient headache diaries during the follow-up period. Additional diagnostic tools include echocardiography with agitated saline contrast, transcranial Doppler, and routine laboratory measurements.

CONCLUSION

The SPRING trial aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of PFO closure versus medication in mitigating migraines in real-world settings. (Clinical Trails ID: NCT04946734).

Patent Foramen Ovale Percutaneous Closure: Evolution and Ongoing Challenges

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) concerns nearly a quarter of the general population and incidence may reach up to 50% in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Recent randomized clinical trials confirmed that percutaneous closure of PFO-related stroke reduces the risk of embolic event recurrence. PFO also comes into play in other pathogenic conditions, such as migraine, decompression sickness or platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome, where the heterogeneity of patients is high and evidence for closure is less well-documented. In this review, we describe the current indications for PFO percutaneous closure and the remaining challenges, and try to provide future directions regarding the technique and its indications.

Efficacy and safety of transesophageal ultrasound-guided patent foramen ovale closure for migraine in adolescents

Objective

This retrospective analysis aims to assess the efficacy of transesophageal ultrasound-guided patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in treating migraine in adolescents and compare the therapeutic outcomes of PFO closure for migraine with and without aura.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 86 cases of adolescents (12-20 years old) who underwent PFO closure for migraine at our institution over the past 3 years. The efficacy was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), headache impact test (HIT)-6, and pediatric migraine disability assessment (PedMIDAS) scores, as well as by assessing the monthly frequency of migraine attacks, duration of each attack, and overall migraine burden. The patients were divided into two groups: an aura group (55 cases) and a non-aura group (31 cases) to investigate difference in therapeutic efficacy between the groups. The effect of residual shunt on migraine burden was assessed.

Results

Among the 86 patients, 46 (54%) experienced complete remission of migraine, while 71 (83%) achieved a >50% reduction in migraine burden during the one-year follow-up period. Patients in the aura group showed more significant improvements in VAS, HIT-6, and PedMIDAS scores, as well as in monthly migraine attack frequency, duration of each attack, and overall migraine burden, than patients in the non-aura group. Moreover, patients with residual shunt did not exhibit statistically significant differences in therapeutic efficacy compared to patients with complete closure.

Conclusion

PFO closure can effectively alleviate migraine symptoms in adolescents with migraine with concomitant PFO. The therapeutic efficacy is particularly pronounced for migraine with aura. Furthermore, minor levels of residual shunt have no effect on the improvement in migraine symptoms.

Comparison of the short-term efficacy of different Amplatzer models and similar occluders in the treatment of patent foramen ovale

Objective

To compare the recent efficacy and safety of different Amplatzer models and similar occluder in the treatment of patent foramen ovale (PFO).

Methods

Patients with PFO complicated with cryptogenic stroke or migraine who underwent transcatheter closure of PFO in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from September 2019 to March 2021 were selected. Patients were grouped according to the type of occluder device. The basic data of the patients were collected and followed up within 1 year after occlusion. Effectiveness was defined as no recurrence of stroke/remission of migraine symptoms and a negative postoperative foaming test, and safety events were counted as the combined results of serious adverse events.

Results

A total of 92 patients were selected, including 45 cases in the symmetrical group and 47 cases in the asymmetric group. There were no serious adverse events in the 2 groups during follow-up. 3 days and 1 month after occlusion, the number of shunt patients in the asymmetric group was significantly less than that in the symmetric group (χ² = 5.484, P = 0.019; χ² = 5.146, P = 0.023). The negative rate of blocked residual shunts in the asymmetric group was higher than that in the symmetric group at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after occlusion (χ² = 6.473, P = 0.011; χ² = 4.305, P = 0.038; χ² = 4.842, P = 0.027; χ² = 4.034, P = 0.045). Headache in migraine patients in the asymmetric group was significantly better than headache in patients in the symmetric group (P = 0.038; P = 0.049).

Conclusion

Asymmetric Amplatzer and similar occluders provide greater efficacy in short-term occlusion than symmetric ones.

Correlation between percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure and recurrence of unexplained syncope

Background

The relationship between patent foramen ovale (PFO) and unexplained syncope remains to be illustrated. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the outcomes and prognostic factors for syncope recurrence after PFO closure.

Methods

Patients with both large right-to-left shunting (RLS) PFO and unexplained syncope who visited the cardiovascular department of Xiangya Hospital Central South University from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 were consecutively enrolled in our study. The recurrence rate of syncope was compared between the non-closure group (n = 20) and the closure group (n = 91).

Results

A total of 111 patients were finally included. After 31.11 ± 14.30 months of follow-up, only 11% of patients in the closure group had recurrent syncope, which was much lower than that of the non-closure group (11.0 vs. 35%, P = 0.018). We further investigated the possible prognostic factors for syncope recurrence in the closure group and found syncope occurring more than five times preoperatively, hypertension, and residual RLS at 12-month follow-up were significantly correlated with a higher number of recurrences.

Conclusions

PFO closure reduced the recurrence rate of unexplained syncope. The efficacy of prevention was prognosticated by factors including the presence or absence of syncope induction, the frequency of syncope episodes, and the presence or absence of hypertension. Syncope recurrence was also related to residual shunts post closure.

Aortic Root Downward Movement as a Novel Method for Identification of an Adequately Performed Valsalva Maneuver to Detect Patent Foramen Ovale during Transesophageal Echocardiograph

The Valsalva maneuver (VM) is the most sensitive auxiliary method for the detection of patent foramen ovale (PFO), but it is difficult to assess whether the maneuver is adequately performed during transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). In this study, we tried to use aortic root downward movement as a novel method for judging whether VM was adequate or not, and to evaluate whether this novel method can increase the sensitivity of detecting PFO. A total of 224 patients with clinically suspected PFO were enrolled in this study. These patients were injected with activated normal saline to detect the right-to-left shunt (RLS), in the following three conditions: contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography under adequate VM (AVM cTTE), contrast-enhanced TEE under non-adequate VM (non-AVM cTEE), and cTEE under adequate VM (AVM cTEE). A novel method in which the aorta root moves downward (movement range ≥16 mm) in the cTEE judged whether AVM was performed. The PFO detection rate and sensitivity of AVM cTEE were better than that of non-AVM cTEE (detection rate: 108 PFOs [48.2%] vs. 86 PFOs [38.4%], p = 0.036; sensitivity: 100% vs. 79.6%). Among AVM cTTE, non-AVM cTEE, and AVM cTEE, the RLS grade evaluation results were inconsistent, with significant differences (p < 0.05). Non-AVM cTEE had RLS underestimation or false negatives. Compared with non-AVM cTEE, AVM cTEE and AVM cTTE had better consistency in evaluating PFO RLS (kappa value = 0.675). Aortic root downward movement could be used as a novel method for judging the effectiveness of VM, which is critical for the detection of PFO in cTEE. Concerning effectiveness and convenience, this method should be promoted during the clinical detection of PFO.

Association of migraine with patent foramen ovale closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Method

Result

Conclusion

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Treating Migraine: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Observational studies have shown percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure to be a safe means of reducing the frequency and duration of migraine.

Objective

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of PFO closure in patients with migraine using evidence-based medicine.

Methods

The Pubmed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and retrospective case series from January 1, 2001, to February 30, 2021. The Jadad scale and R 4.1.0 software were used to assess the quality of the literature and meta-analysis, respectively.

Results

In total, three randomized controlled trials, one pooled study, and eight retrospective case series including 1,165 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with control intervention in migraine, PFO closure could significantly reduce headache frequency (OR = 1.5698, 95% CI: 1.0465–2.3548, p=0.0293) and monthly migraine attacks and monthly migraine days (OR = 0.2594, 95% CI: 0.0790–0.4398, p=0.0048). Subgroup analysis of patients who all completed PFO surgery showed resolution of migraine headache for migraines with aura (OR = 1.5856, 95% CI: 1.0665–2.3575, p=0.0227).

Conclusions

Treatment with PFO closure could reduce the frequency of headaches and monthly migraine days and is an efficient treatment for migraine attacks with aura.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Interventions for Structural Heart Disease

Contemporary evidence supports device-based transcatheter interventions for the management of patients with structural heart disease. These procedures, which include aortic valve implantation, mitral or tricuspid valve repair/implantation, left atrial appendage occlusion, and patent foramen ovale closure, profoundly differ with respect to clinical indications and procedural aspects. Yet, patients undergoing transcatheter cardiac interventions require antithrombotic therapy before, during, or after the procedure to prevent thromboembolic events. However, these therapies are associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications. To date, challenges and controversies exist regarding balancing the risk of thrombotic and bleeding complications in these patients such that the optimal antithrombotic regimens to adopt in each specific procedure is still unclear. In this review, we summarize current evidence on antithrombotic therapies for device-based transcatheter interventions targeting structural heart disease and emphasize the importance of a tailored approach in these patients.

The evolving role of echocardiography in the assessment of patent foramen ovale in patients with left-side thromboembolism

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common congenital cardiac abnormality found approximately in 25% of the adult population The pathophysiological role of paradoxical embolization through the PFO in ischemic stroke is well established. "Self-expanding double disk" and, more recently, suture-based "deviceless" systems are used for PFO closure in the setting of secondary prevention after ischemic stroke likely related to paradoxical embolization. Ultrasound plays a significant role in PFO assessment, indication to treatment, intra-procedural guidance, and follow-up for those undergoing PFO closure. Three different techniques are frequently used for these purposes: transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiogram, and transcranial Doppler. In this review, advantages and limits of these techniques are discussed in detail to improve our skills in detection and treatment of this important condition by using ultrasound.

The Efficacy of Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure on Migraine: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies

Objectives

Whether patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is effective on migraine is controversial. This article was aimed at assessing the efficacy of PFO closure on migraine based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to October 2020 evaluating PFO closure versus control in patients with migraine, then conducted a meta-analysis of all RCTs and observational studies, respectively. The main outcomes were (1) respond rate: complete cessation of migraine; (2) reduction in the frequency of migraine attacks per month; and (3) reduction in migraine days per month.

Results

Seven studies (3 RCTs and 4 observational studies), containing 887 migraine patients, were identified. (1) The respond rate of PFO closure on migraine was significantly higher than control group both in RCT subgroup and observational studies subgroup (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.35-11.04, P = 0.01 in RCTs; OR 8.28, 95% CI 2.31-29.67, P = 0.001 in observational studies). (2) Reduction in frequency of migraine attacks was higher in PFO closure group compared with control group in the RCT subgroup analysis (mean difference (MD) = 0.57, 95% CI 0.23-0.90, P = 0.0009). (3) Reduction in migraine days was also higher in PFO closure group compared with control group in the RCT subgroup analysis (MD = 1.33, 95% CI 0.35-2.31, P = 0.008).

Conclusions

PFO closure might be suitable for migraine patients, especially for migraine with aura, by cessation of migraine headaches or reducing migraine attacks and migraine days.

Pooled Analysis of PFO Occluder Device Trials in Patients With PFO and Migraine

BACKGROUND

Although observational studies have shown percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure to be a safe means of reducing the frequency and duration of migraine, randomized clinical trials have not met their primary efficacy endpoints.

OBJECTIVES

The authors report the results of a pooled analysis of individual participant data from the 2 randomized trials using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder to assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous device closure as a therapy for episodic migraine with or without aura.

METHODS

The authors analyzed individual patient-level data from 2 randomized migraine trials (the PRIMA [Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Migraine With Aura] and PREMIUM [Prospective Randomized Investigation to Evaluate Incidence of Headache Reduction in Subjects with Migraine and PFO Using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder Compared to Medical Management] studies). Efficacy endpoints were mean reduction in monthly migraine days, responder rate (defined as ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine attacks), mean reduction in monthly migraine attacks, and percentage of patients who experienced complete cessation of migraine. The safety endpoint was major procedure- and device-related adverse events.

RESULTS

Among 337 subjects, 176 were randomized by blocks to device closure and 161 to medical treatment only. At 12-month follow-up, the analysis met 3 of the 4 efficacy endpoints: mean reduction of monthly migraine days (-3.1 days vs. -1.9 days; p = 0.02), mean reduction of monthly migraine attacks (-2.0 vs. -1.4; p = 0.01), and number of subjects who experienced complete cessation of migraine (14 [9%] vs. 1 [0.7%]; p < 0.001). For the safety analysis, 9 procedure-related and 4 device-related adverse events occurred in 245 subjects who eventually received devices. All events were transient and resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

This pooled analysis of patient-level data demonstrates that PFO closure was safe and significantly reduced the mean number of monthly migraine days and monthly migraine attacks, and resulted in a greater number of subjects who experienced complete migraine cessation.

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale: Current evidence and future perspectives

Recent prospective controlled studies have demonstrated that transcatheter closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) reduces recurrent stroke risk in select patients, especially in patients younger than 60 years with PFO and embolic-appearing infarct and where no other mechanism of stroke was identified. Detection of PFO depends on the intensity of the Valsalva maneuver, and not all PFOs can be diagnosed using transesophageal echocardiography. Transthoracic contrast echocardiography using abdominal compression during the Valsalva maneuver is an easy method that can increase the detection sensitivity of PFO shunt. PFO with two or more of the following factors is most likely considered a "high-risk PFO" and as such, has a significantly higher probability of cryptogenic stroke: (1) a long-tunnel PFO (≥10 mm in length), (2) atrial septal aneurysm and/or hypermobile interatrial septum, (3) prominent Eustachian valve or Chiari's network, (4) large right-to-left shunt at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver, and (5) low-angle PFO. In order to establish the benefit of catheter-based PFO closure as a safe and effective treatment in clinical practice, the degree of accuracy of PFO diagnosis and its long-term safety need to be confirmed.

Efficacy of patent foramen ovale closure for treating migraine: a prospective follow-up study

This study aims to evaluate the potential of percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure to improve the headache in patients with migraine and PFO, and discuss the difference between the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the single-center studies. Patients of migraine with a large shunt of PFO, who experienced ≥2 headache attacks per month and failed ≥2 categories of standardized medication, underwent PFO closure in First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University. The clinical outcomes, including frequency and duration of headache attacks, Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) score, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up after the PFO closure. The different efficacies of the clinical outcomes between patients with and without aura as well as different grades of PFO were also evaluated, respectively. 134 patients with migraine (39 male and 95 female) with PFO were enrolled, whose average age was 39.21±11.37 years. After PFO closure, there was a significant reduction in frequency and duration of headache attacks, HIT-6 score, and VAS score at 3, 6, and 12 months’ follow-up (p<0.001). Migraine was completely relieved in 54 (40.30%) patients during 12 months’ follow-up. The frequency of migraine was reduced by >50% in 44 (32.84%) patients at 3 months’ follow-up and increased to 48 (35.82%) at 12 months’ follow-up. 31.03% patients remained residual shunt after 6 months of closure with varying improvements of headache. This study confirmed that PFO closure can effectively reduce frequency and duration of migraine and improve quality of life, but the definitive indications and long-term effect still need further research.