The IN.PACT DEEP Clinical Drug-Coated Balloon Trial: 5-Year Outcomes

Algorithm for the Revascularization of Infrainguinal Arterial Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common vascular condition affecting over 200 million people worldwide. It is primarily characterized by stenosis or occlusion of peripheral arteries due to atherosclerosis. The infrainguinal segment is frequently involved in PAD, making revascularization decisions for infrainguinal arterial disease (IAD) complex. Multiple factors, including the patient's condition and anatomical characteristics, must be carefully considered when determining the optimal treatment approach. Once these factors are evaluated, the first revascularization strategy is selected from among open, endovascular, or hybrid modalities, based on high-level evidence. Endovascular therapy is widely accepted as the standard treatment for simple IAD, with balloon angioplasty and stenting being the commonly used techniques. However, advancements in endovascular techniques have enabled the treatment of increasingly complex lesions. Additionally, drug-based technologies have enhanced the durability of treatment outcomes, including improvements in primary patency rates and freedom from target lesion revascularization. Similar to surgical endarterectomy, percutaneous atherectomy has been developed to remove atherosclerotic plaques and mitigate intimal calcification. The purpose of this paper is to present an algorithm for revascularization of IAD through a comprehensive review of studies comparing the outcomes of various treatment modalities.

Current insights into drug-coated balloons for peripheral arterial disease

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis. It is often associated with coronary and/or cerebral vascular involvement, leading to a higher risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, among which myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Cardiovascular prevention has proven effective in reducing the progression of the disease and early diagnosis leads to more rapid initiation of medical therapy. However, revascularization of the diseased segment represents the only solution in the manifest and symptomatic forms of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

Surgical treatment has historically represented the first treatment of PAD, which consists in the creation of bypasses excluding the obstructed segment. Nowadays, endovascular treatment represents in many cases the first line of intervention. Drug-coated balloons are a cornerstone solution for the treatment of peripheral lesions and are supported by multiple trials demonstrating their efficacy and safety.

EXPERT OPINION

New devices, such as sirolimus-eluting balloons, and also new eluting technologies will further improve the efficacy and the results of peripheral angioplasty. In the next years, we will experience the routinary use of new techniques currently under study. In this review, we will discuss the role of drug-coated balloons in the treatment of PAD.

Application of the chocolate balloon (restrictive dilatation technique) in vascular preparation for arterial angioplasty of the lower limbs

Objective

This study aims to compare the immediate clinical effects of the chocolate balloon and the conventional balloon in endovascular angioplasty of the lower limbs.

Methods

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from a single center, including 117 patients with lower limb arterial lesions treated from January to December 2021 and 112 patients treated from January to December 2023 at our center. The comparison focused on the incidence of vascular dissection after balloon dilatation, with secondary endpoints including the stent implantation rate.

Results

In both groups, the success rate was 100%. Dissection formation rates in the chocolate balloon and conventional balloon groups were 20.5% vs. 17.5%, respectively. Non-flow-limiting dissection formation rates were 14.7% vs. 4.8% (P < 0.05), while severe dissection rates were 5.8% vs. 12.7% (P < 0.05). Stent implantation rates were 9.0% in the chocolate balloon group and 18.3% in the conventional balloon group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The use of chocolate balloons resulted in a lower incidence of severe dissection and reduced the stent implantation rate compared to conventional balloons. It effectively prepares complex multiple lesions of lower limb arteries in real-world scenarios.

TEG-Guided Anticoagulation Assessment in Deep Vein Arterialization: A Prospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Deep vein arterialization (DVA) is an innovative surgical technique aimed at enhancing blood flow in compromised limbs facing amputation. Maintenance of flow postrevascularization is crucial to limb salvage. As this is a new technique, no standardized thromboprophylaxis regime is currently established, and postprocedure thromboprophylaxis is at the discretion of the proceduralist. This study aims to evaluate coagulation profiles using viscoelastic studies in peripheral artery disease patients who underwent DVA, assessing the impact of various postprocedure thromboprophylaxis regimens.

METHODS

Patients (aged > 60 years) undergoing DVA were prospectively evaluated using thromboelastography at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months (2020-2024). Postprocedure thromboprophylaxis included mono antiplatelet therapy (MAPT), MAPT + direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), or DAPT + DOAC. Coagulation profiles were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Among 16 patients (mean age 66.6 years, 75% male/Caucasian), hypertension and hyperlipidemia were present in 91%, and diabetes in 88%. The DAPT + DOAC group showed consistently superior platelet inhibition with the lowest adenosine diphosphate maximum amplitude values throughout baseline (35.65 mm vs. 42.2-65.03 mm in other groups), 1 month (26.7 mm vs. 32.14-69.4 mm), 3 months (27.36 mm vs. 32.2-39.97 mm), and 6 months (43.7 mm vs. 50.2-50.5 mm). MAPT demonstrated the slowest clot strengthening (citrated kaolin angle 65.25° vs. 68.7-71.55°).

CONCLUSION

Thromboelastography with platelet mapping demonstrated enhanced platelet inhibition and reduced clot formation in the DAPT + DOAC group, suggesting the importance of coagulation monitoring.

Unmet Needs and Opportunities for Australian Innovation and Clinical Research to Improve Quality of Life and Outcomes in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is characterised by atherosclerotic stenosis or occlusion of arteries that leads to reduced blood flow to the limbs. PAD is associated with a very high rate of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality making the health and economic burden of PAD substantial. Despite high-quality evidence and international guidelines recommending conservative medical management of risk factors, and exercise and lifestyle interventions, surgical revascularisation (open or endovascular) remains the main treatment for PAD. Alarmingly, up to one-third of patients do not receive best medical therapy after revascularisation surgery despite evidence supporting this treatment reduces cardiovascular events. Due to the considerable health burden that PAD presents, this manuscript aims to identify gaps in care and clinical research in PAD across Australia and proposes potential collaborative solutions. In Australia, there is significant disparity in care between rural/regional and metropolitan communities. These gaps are exacerbated by inequitable access to services across Australia, particularly for First Nation Australians, culturally and linguistically diverse groups and those living in regional and remote areas. This review identifies unmet needs for patients with PAD that are multifaceted, spanning from improved understanding of disease mechanisms, diagnostic tools for risk stratification and personalised therapy, to a paucity of medical and rehabilitation therapies for symptoms or prevention of cardiovascular complications. Furthermore, there are opportunities for national and international registries to optimise clinical trial quality and outcomes. Strategies should be applied to improve implementation of optimal medical therapy in PAD which will improve quality of life, reduce health care costs, and prevent secondary complications, limb loss, and mortality across Australia's diverse population.

Long-term Outcomes of the AcoArt II-BTK Trial: Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions

PURPOSE

Previous studies have indicated mixed short-term outcomes between drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of infrapopliteal lesions. However, the long-term durability of DCB angioplasty remains uncertain. The objective of this study is to present the long-term outcomes of DCB angioplasty for infrapopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The AcoArt II-BTK Trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial that enrolled 120 patients with CLI. The patients were randomized 1:1 to DCB angioplasty or PTA. Assessments over 5 years included freedom from all-cause death, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and occurrence of major amputation. Additional endpoints included the rate of composite major adverse events.

RESULTS

Over 5 years, patients treated with DCB angioplasty demonstrated a higher rate of freedom from all-cause death than patients treated with PTA (Kaplan-Meier estimate 74.6% vs 57.2%; log-rank p=0.04). The major amputation rate was 5.2% for DCB angioplasty compared with 1.8% for PTA (log-rank p=0.347). Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was 70.5% and 53.7%, respectively (log-rank p=0.058). The rate of composite major adverse events was 34.5% for DCB angioplasty and 56.1% for PTA (log-rank p=0.013), and this statistically significant difference persisted throughout the 5-year follow-up period. Conclusion:Infrapopliteal artery revascularization in patients with CLI using Litos/Tulip DCB angioplasty showed superior 5-year overall survival compared with PTA. The DCB angioplasty group had a consistently lower rate of major adverse events within 5 years of follow-up.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The use of DCB in infrapopliteal arterial lesions has been controversial regarding both early and mid-term outcomes, with limited data on long-term results. However, this article demonstrates that the Litos/Tulip DCB exhibits favorable long-term outcomes in infrapopliteal artery lesions. These positive findings provide robust evidence supporting the use of DCB in treating infrapopliteal artery disease.

Moving away from metal: Step toward the future with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and novel antiproliferative agents

Background

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common source of morbidity and mortality globally and is expected to raise increase in prevalence. Many endovascular techniques exist to manage PAD; however, there remains room for improvement, especially as it relates to below-the-knee vessels. Recent evidence and devices are leading to a resurgence of interest in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and the -limus family of antiproliferative drugs in the PAD treatment space.

Methods

This nonsystematic review examines emerging technology for treatment of PAD with a specific focus on below-the-knee vessels and bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. Additional emerging and early technology such as novel delivery platforms are also briefly discussed with directions of future research highlighted.

Results

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold biomechanics and history are highlighted. Foundational knowledge of antiproliferative agents and evolving agents in peripheral vascular disease are also described.

Conclusions

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds are an additional endovascular tool for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease. The integration with an antiproliferative agent may result in improved patency and performance; however, there is a paucity of data in the literature at present.

A Bibliometric Analysis on Adherence to Reporting Standards for Endovascular Treatment of Chronic Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

The treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) involves a broad spectrum of therapies including many new and emerging techniques. To standardize the results of studies examining this pathology and to allow critical analysis and comparison between studies, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) recommended reporting standard guidelines for the endovascular management of CLTI in 2016. Research studies that do not adhere to complete reporting standards are often more ambiguous in impact and external validity, leading to bias and misinformation that has potentially damaging effects on clinical decision-making. We thus sought to examine adherence to and factors associated with noncompliance with these recommended guidelines.

METHODS

A literature database search was conducted to include all clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, and retrospective comparative studies written in English examining the endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD)/CLTI from January 2020 to August 2022. Systematic reviews, case reports, and meta-analysis were excluded. The manuscripts were reviewed for adherence with the SVS guidelines (overall and by guideline subcategories based on demographics, treatment methods, and outcomes), and factors associated with this adherence were determined. These data were used to calculate descriptive and comparative statistics.

RESULTS

Fifty-four manuscripts were identified from this time frame. On average, articles reviewed reported on 42.0% of the SVS reporting standards (range, 25.0-65.2%, Fig 1) with 74.1% of articles (n = 40) not adhering to at least 50.0% of the standards. Manuscripts most completely followed guidelines regarding "patient factors" and were least likely to demonstrate adherence to the description of CLTI and study complications. Within the guideline subcategories, complete adherence to guidelines was not demonstrated in any manuscript in stent trials, disease outcome measures, technical outcome measures, patient factors and critical limb ischemia description, and complete adherence rates within the other subcategories was low (range, 5.6-18.6%). Studies conducted within the United States and those with industry sponsorship were more likely to adhere to >50% of the reporting standards (P < 0.05). Journal impact factor, year of publication, and number of authors had no correlation to the percent adherence to guidelines in specific categories or adherence overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to reporting standard guidelines for endovascular treatment of lower extremity PAD specifically outlined by the SVS is suboptimal regardless of the quality of the journal the research is published in. Increasing adherence to reporting standards to provide a framework for comparison of studies across techniques used should be prioritized by authors, journal editors, and vascular societies.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Different Balloon Angioplasty Procedures for Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal endovascular method to treat infrapopliteal chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) remains to be determined, given the limitations of stent use in infrapopliteal artery disease. We performed a network meta-analysis (NWM) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to simultaneously compare the outcomes of different balloon angioplasty procedures for infrapopliteal artery lesions in CLTI patients.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and PubMed. 8 eligible RCTs involving 3 endovascular modalities or combinations (plain old balloon angioplasty [POBA], drug-coated balloon [DCB], orbital atherectomy plus plain old balloon angioplasty [OA+POBA]) were included. Primary outcomes were efficacy (12-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization [CDTLR]) and safety (12-month major amputation and all-cause mortality). We used random-effects models based on the frequentist framework.

RESULTS

Plain old balloon angioplasty had a higher 12-month CDTLR rate than DCB (relative risk [RR]: 2.11, confidence interval [CI]: 1.33, 3.34) in the NWM and this result was still statistically significant (RR: 0.47, CI: 0.30, 0.75) in subgroup analyses. According to the SUCRA value, in terms of 12-month CDTLR, OA+POBA was considered the best treatment (SUCRA=72.2), while POBA was considered the worst treatment (SUCRA=8.9). In terms of 12-month all-cause mortality, OA+POBA was considered the best treatment (SUCRA=95.0), while DCB was considered the worst treatment (SUCRA=12.8). In terms of 12-month major amputation, POBA was considered the best treatment (SUCRA=72.0), while DCB was considered the worst treatment (SUCRA=23.0).

CONCLUSIONS

In infrapopliteal CLTI disease, DCB showed a significantly lower 12-month CDTLR in comparison to POBA. There is no statistically significant evidence to suggest that DCB raises safety concerns. The SUCRA values of OA+POBA indicate that it might offer a superior treatment option compared to DCB or POBA in terms of CDTLR and mortality. This advantage, however, was not sustained when major-amputation rates were analyzed. Consequently, further RCTs are required to examine the potential benefits of OA and other forms of atherectomy for managing infrapopliteal CLTI disease.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The findings of this study provide further evidence for the safety of DCB in the application of infrapopliteal CLTI disease and suggest preliminary benefits of atherectomy. These results are likely to encourage further research and application of these treatment modalities in managing infrapopliteal CLTI.POBA has been a traditional approach for treating infrapopliteal artery disease. The current evidence supports clinicians in exploring and utilizing DCB and atherectomy as better treatments.We focused on the performance of different balloon angioplasty procedures in infrapopliteal CLTI, considering the characteristics of infrapopliteal CLTI.

Drug-eluting devices for lower limb peripheral arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease is the third leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity after coronary artery disease and stroke. Lower limb peripheral arterial disease commonly involves infrainguinal arteries, may impair walking ability (intermittent claudication) and may confer a significant risk of limb loss (chronic limb-threatening ischaemia), depending on the severity of ischaemia. Endovascular treatment has become the mainstay revascularisation option in both the femoropopliteal and the below-the-knee arterial segments. After crossing and preparing the lesion, treatment results in these arterial segments can be enhanced by using drug-coated devices (drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons) that mitigate the occurrence of restenosis. As for other medical devices, the use of drug-eluting devices is based on their demonstrated safety and efficacy profiles when applied in the distinct segments of the lower limb vasculature. In this state-of-the-art narrative review we provide an overview of the safety and efficacy of drug-coated devices when used in the femoropopliteal and below-the-knee arterial segments.

Dual-pathway inhibition in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia requiring reintervention for infrapopliteal occlusions

Our study aimed to assess the influence of incorporating new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy on clinical outcomes among patients who underwent endovascular intervention for below-the-knee (BTK) occlusions necessitating reintervention. The inclusion criteria encompassed patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and had undergone a successful endovascular intervention for BTK artery occlusion, necessitating reintervention. Patients who underwent endovascular interventions for BTK reocclusion were compared to those who received dual-pathway inhibition with NOAC (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg 2 × 1) and clopidogrel (NOAC group), or dual-antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin (DAPT group). The primary endpoints were target vessel reocclusion and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at the 1-year follow-up, while major and minor amputations served as the secondary endpoint. Additionally, a one-year comparison was conducted between the two groups for major bleeding events. 64 patients in our clinic treated with endovascular reintervention (NOAC = 28, DAPT = 34). The TLR rate is 10.7% in NOAC group (N = 3) and 32.4% in DAPT group (N = 11, p = 0.043). The target vessel reocclusion rate is 17.8% in NOAC group (N = 5) and 41.2% in DAPT group (N = 14, p = 0.048). Minor or major amputation rate at 1-year follow-up was 3.6% in NOAC group (N = 1) and 11.7% in DAPT group (N = 4, p = 0.245). The patency rate is significantly higher, and the TLR rate is significantly lower in the NOAC group compared to the DAPT group, with no significant difference in major bleeding between the two groups. Although no statistically significant difference exists in amputation rates, a numerical distinction is evident.

Network Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing the Outcomes of Different Endovascular Revascularisation Treatments for Infra-inguinal Peripheral Arterial Disease Causing Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different endovascular revascularisation procedures for treating chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) using network meta-analysis (NMA).

DATA SOURCES

The databases PubMed and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials were searched on 14 March 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

A NMA of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy of different endovascular revascularisation techniques for treating CLTI was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The primary and secondary outcomes were major amputation and death, respectively. Random effects models were developed and the results were presented using surface under the cumulative ranking curve plots and forest plots. A p value of ≤ .050 was considered statistically significant. The Cochrane collaborative tool was used to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS

A total of 2 655 participants of whom 94.8% had CLTI were included. Eleven trials compared plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) vs. drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty (n = 1 771), five trials compared bare metal stent (BMS) vs. drug coated stent (DCS) (n = 466), three trials compared atherectomy vs. DCB (n = 194), two trials compared PBA vs. BMS (n = 70), one trial compared PBA vs. atherectomy (n = 50), and one trial compared BMS vs. DCB (n = 104). None of the revascularisation strategies significantly reduced the risk of major amputation or death compared with PBA. Using the network estimates, GRADE certainty of evidence for improvement in major amputation outcomes for DCB was moderate, for atherectomy and BMS was low, and for DCS was very low compared with PBA. Risk of bias was low in 16 trials, of some concerns in six trials, and high in one trial, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is no current evidence from RCTs to reliably conclude that BMS, DCB, DCS, or atherectomy are superior to PBA in preventing major amputation and death in patients with CLTI. Larger comparative RCTs are needed to identify the best endovascular revascularisation strategy.

Safety and Effectiveness of Passeo-18 Lux Drug-Coated Balloon Catheter in Infrainguinal Endovascular Revascularization in the Korean Population: A Multicenter Post-Market Surveillance Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of the Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon (DCB) in endovascular revascularization procedures under real-world conditions in a Korean population with atherosclerotic disease of the infrainguinal arteries, including below-the-knee (BTK) arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight institutions in the Republic of Korea participated in this prospective, multicenter, single-arm, post-market surveillance study. Two hundred patients with Rutherford class 2-5 peripheral arterial disease and infrainguinal lesions suitable for endovascular treatment were competitively enrolled. Data were collected at baseline, the time of intervention, discharge, and 1-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up visits. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events (MAE) within 6 months (except when limiting the time frame for procedure- or device-related mortality to within 30 days), and the primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) within 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients with 332 target lesions were analyzed. Two-thirds of the patients had diabetes mellitus, and 41.6% had chronic limb-threatening ischemia. The median target lesion length was 100 mm (interquartile range: 56-133 mm). Of the target lesions, 35.2% were occlusions, and 14.8% were located in the BTK arteries. Rate of freedom from MAE was 97.9% at 6 months, and the rate of freedom from CD-TLR was 95.0% and 92.2% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis of 43 patients and 49 target lesions involving the BTK arteries showed rate of freedom from MAE of 92.8% at 6 months and rates of freedom from CD-TLR of 88.8% and 84.4% at 12 and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study, including the BTK subgroup analysis, showed outcomes comparable to those of other DCB studies, confirming the safety and effectiveness of Passeo-18 Lux DCB in the Korean population.

The phenomenon of drug-coating embolism during lower extremity endovascular interventions with paclitaxel-coated balloon

INTRODUCTION

There is a risk of distal embolization lower extremity endovascular interventions. Possibly a drug-coating embolism caused by coating detachment from intravascular devices.

METHODS

This review focuses on providing updated information on distal embolism in endovascular revascularization of lower extremity arteries, including the use of drug-coated balloons.

RESULTS

Drug-coating embolism is a special case of distal embolization during recanalization of the arteries of the lower extremities. Preclinical studies have demonstrated embolization of drug-coated balloons during angioplasty of lower extremity arteries. However, the clinical role of drug-coating embolism is not completely clear. A 2020 meta-analysis found an increased risk of major lower extremity amputation after drug-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with critical limb ischemia. But long-term research is emerging to support the safety of using these devices. Perhaps a more thorough assessment of the quality of life and the degree of compensation of lower limb ischemia with an intraoperative assessment of the frequency of peripheral embolizations using ultrasound emboli detection, as well as microcirculation with transcutaneous oximetry and laser Doppler flowmetry of the operated lower limb will allow a more detailed study of the phenomenon of drug-coating embolism and its impact on long-term clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

According to the results of preclinical studies, the use of paclitaxel-coated balloons leads to an increase in the concentration of paclitaxel in distal skeletal muscles. However, paclitaxel concentration in skeletal muscle was significantly higher in first-generation DCBs. The non-target effects of drug-coating balloon are not fully understood and require further study. Understanding the phenomenon of drug-coating embolism can help physicians to better assess the patient risk and to minimize complications.

Nationwide Study of the Outcome of Treatment of Lower Extremity Atherosclerotic Lesions With Endovascular Surgery With or Without Drug Eluting Methods in Patients With Diabetes

CLINICAL IMPACT

This retrospective observational registry trial combines national registries for vascular surgical procedures and diabetes mellitus to clarify results of drug eluting technology in treating diabetic subjects with intermittent claudication or chronic limb threatening ischemia compared to treatment of non-diabetic subjects. As earlier proposed and showed in this trial, there may be an implication for a beneficial treatment efficacy with drug eluting therapy in the diabetic population with PAD compared to the non-diabetic population. A finding worth further exploration.

Pharmacotherapy and revascularization strategies of peripheral artery disease

The global epidemiological transition of atherosclerotic vascular diseases is witnessing a rapid redistribution of its burden, shifting from high-income to low- and middle-income countries. With a wide clinical spectrum, spanning from intermittent claudication to more complex critical limb threatening ischemia, nonhealing ulcers, gangrene as well as acute limb ischemia, peripheral artery disease is often faced with the challenges of under-diagnosis and under-treatment despite its high prevalence. The management of peripheral arterial disease in patients with multiple comorbidities presents a formidable challenge and remains a pressing global health concern. In this review, we aim to provide an in-depth overview of the pathophysiology of peripheral artery disease and explore evidence-based management strategies encompassing pharmacological, lifestyle, interventional, and surgical approaches. By addressing these challenges, the review contributes to a better understanding of the evolving landscape of peripheral artery disease, offering insights into effective and holistic management strategies.

Comparing Endovascular Approaches in Lower Extremity Artery Disease: Insights from a Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy offers an alternative for treating femoropopliteal (FP) and infrapopliteal (IP) lesions related to occlusive lower extremity artery disease. Despite numerous trials, the effectiveness of restenosis prevention using local drug delivery devices remains a topic of debate.

OBJECTIVES

An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted. Our overall aim was to summarize the most recent clinical evidence regarding endovascular approaches for FP and IP atherosclerotic lesions.

METHODS

We conducted a search for randomized trials in the MEDLINE database, and extracted data related to clinical endpoints. Our primary focus was on the rate of major adverse events (MAEs), including mortality, amputation, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). A multiple treatment network meta-analysis supplemented with component network analyses was performed to examine the impact of combined treatment.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 33 randomized controlled trials encompassing 5766 patients. This included 19 studies focused on femoropopliteal and 14 on IP lesions, accounting for 3565 and 2201 patients, respectively. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) displayed a reduced MAE risk in comparison to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA)-RR for DCB: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.52-0.77) and for DES: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.51-0.99). The bare-metal stent (BMS) group manifested the most substantial MAE risk, being 59% higher relative to the DCB cohort (BMS vs. DCB RR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.03-2.47). For FP lesions, DES was the standout performer, curtailing MAE risk by 55% relative to POBA. Within IP lesions, DES mitigated the MAE risk by 25% versus POBA. DCB did not exhibit any notable MAE reduction when pitted against POBA.

CONCLUSION

In FP arteries, both DESs and DCBs yielded significantly diminished MAEs, thus outpacing other techniques. Regarding IP arteries, only DESs resulted in significantly fewer MAEs. In alignment with contemporary research, our findings revealed no signs of elevated mortality in patients undergoing treatment with drug-eluting apparatuses.

The Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Infrapopliteal Revascularization: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) to standard endovascular techniques like percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bare metal stent (BMS) for treating infrapopliteal artery disease.

METHODS

Including 8 DCB trials and 4 DES trials, this meta-analysis of 12 recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is comprehensive. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science of Web, Cochrane, and PubMed for this meta-analysis. We searched these databases for papers from their inception to February 2023. We also analyzed the references given in the listed studies and any future study that cited them. No language or publication date restrictions were applied to the 12 RCTs. The experimental group includes 8 DCB studies and 4 DES investigations, the DCB group is primarily concerned with the paclitaxel devices, whereas the DES group is preoccupied with the "-limus" devices. Key clinical outcomes in this study were primary patency and binary restenosis rates. This study's secondary outcomes are late lumen loss (LLL), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), limb amputation, and all-cause mortality. The evidence quality was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias. The PROSPERO registration number for this study is CRD42023462038.

FINDINGS

Only 108 of 1152 publications found satisfied qualifying criteria and contained data. All 13 RCTs have low to moderate bias. Drug-coated balloons and DESs were compared in the excluded study. The analysis comprised 2055 participants from 12 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, including 1417 DCB patients and 638 DES patients. Drug-coated balloons outperform traditional methods in short-term monitoring of primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR. The benefits fade over time, and the 2 techniques had similar major amputation rates, mortality rates, and LLL. Drug-eluting stents outperform conventional procedures in primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR during medium-term to short-term follow-up. Comparing the 2 methods, major and minor amputations, death rate, and LLL were similar.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of DES and DCB with PTA or BMS shows that DES had better follow-up results. DCB has positive short-term results, but long-term effects differ, however, more research is needed to determine when DES and DCB should be used in medical procedures.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The provision of additional evidence to substantiate the advancement of drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy in the treatment of lower limb arteriosclerosis obliterans, particularly in the below-the-knee area characterized by high calcium load and significant occlusion, is comparable in efficacy to conventional procedures. This finding is advantageous for the progress of interventional revascularization. The advancement and efficacy of DCB have resulted in improved treatment outcomes for medical practitioners in clinical settings. Our research incorporates the most recent randomized experiments.

Drug-Eluting Resorbable Scaffold versus Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and infrapopliteal artery disease, angioplasty has been associated with frequent reintervention and adverse limb outcomes from restenosis. The effect of the use of drug-eluting resorbable scaffolds on these outcomes remains unknown.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, 261 patients with CLTI and infrapopliteal artery disease were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive treatment with an everolimus-eluting resorbable scaffold or angioplasty. The primary efficacy end point was freedom from the following events at 1 year: amputation above the ankle of the target limb, occlusion of the target vessel, clinically driven revascularization of the target lesion, and binary restenosis of the target lesion. The primary safety end point was freedom from major adverse limb events at 6 months and from perioperative death.

RESULTS

The primary efficacy end point was observed (i.e., no events occurred) in 135 of 173 patients in the scaffold group and 48 of 88 patients in the angioplasty group (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 74% vs. 44%; absolute difference, 30 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15 to 46; one-sided P<0.001 for superiority). The primary safety end point was observed in 165 of 170 patients in the scaffold group and 90 of 90 patients in the angioplasty group (absolute difference, -3 percentage points; 95% CI, -6 to 0; one-sided P<0.001 for noninferiority). Serious adverse events related to the index procedure occurred in 2% of the patients in the scaffold group and 3% of those in the angioplasty group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CLTI due to infrapopliteal artery disease, the use of an everolimus-eluting resorbable scaffold was superior to angioplasty with respect to the primary efficacy end point. (Funded by Abbott; LIFE-BTK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04227899.).

Evaluation of an Infrapopliteal Drug-Eluting Resorbable Scaffold: Design Methodology for the LIFE-BTK Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a severe condition characterized by rest pain and ischemic tissue loss that affects 5% to 10% of people with peripheral artery disease. In the United States, there are few Food and Drug Administration-approved devices for the primary treatment of arteries below-the-knee (BTK). Unfortunately, all suffer from high restenosis rates due to intimal hyperplasia, elastic recoil, and untreated dissection because of a lack of scaffolding. The Esprit BTK system is a resorbable, drug-eluting scaffold device with the potential to address an unmet need in people suffering from CLTI because of infrapopliteal atherosclerosis. The LIFE-BTK (pivotaL Investigation of saFety and Efficacy of drug-eluting resorbable scaffold treatment-Below The Knee) randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a prospectively designed premarket evaluation of the Esprit BTK drug-eluting resorbable scaffold used in the treatment of those patients.

Methods

The LIFE-BTK trial enrolled 261 subjects with CLTI for the RCT and a further 7 subjects for a pharmacokinetic substudy. The objective of the RCT was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Esprit BTK scaffold compared to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of limb salvage and primary patency at 12 months. The primary safety end point is freedom from major adverse limb events and peri-operative death at 6 months and 30 days, respectively. Clinical follow-up care is planned for 5 years.

Conclusions

Novel devices must be tested in RCTs to evaluate their safety and efficacy compared to the standard of care if we are to improve outcomes for this challenging group of patients.

Paclitaxel Protects against Isoproterenol-Induced Damage in Rat Myocardium: Its Heme-Oxygenase Mediated Role in Cardiovascular Research

(1) Background: In cardiovascular applications, paclitaxel inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration and significantly reduces the occurrence of restenosis and target lesion revascularization. However, the cellular effects of paclitaxel in the myocardium are not well understood; (2) Methods: Wistar rats were divided into four groups: control (CTRL), isoproterenol (ISO) treated (1 mg/kg) and two groups treated with paclitaxel (PAC), which was administrated (10 mg/kg/day) for 5 days by gavage/per os alone or in combination (ISO + PAC) 3 weeks after ISO treatment. Ventricular tissue was harvested 24 h later for measurements of heme oxygenase (HO-1), reduced glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), superoxide dismutase (SOD), NF-κB, TNF-α and myeloperoxidase (MPO); (3) Results: HO-1 protein concentration, HO-1 activity, SOD protein concentration and total glutathione significantly decreased in response to ISO treatment. When PAC was administered in conjunction with ISO, HO-1, SOD concentration and total glutathione were not different from control levels. MPO activity, NF-κB concentration and TNF-α protein concentration were significantly increased in the ISO-only group, while the levels of these molecules were restored when PAC was co-administered; (4) Conclusions: Oral administration of PAC can maintain the expression of important antioxidants, anti-inflammatory molecules, HO-1, SOD and GSH, and suppress the production of TNF-α, MPO and NF-κB, which are involved in myocardial damage. The principal component of this cellular defense seems to be the expression of HO-1.

Effect of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty of Infrapopliteal Lesions on Mortality

BACKGROUND

Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials have suggested an increased long-term mortality risk following femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal angioplasty using paclitaxel-coated devices. This study was conducted to evaluate long-term mortality after paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) of infrapopliteal lesions in real-world practice.

METHODS

A retrospective mortality analysis of patients with at least 3 years of follow-up who underwent balloon-based endovascular therapy of infrapopliteal lesions was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 2,424 patients with infrapopliteal lesions were treated within the study period. Five hundred seventy-six patients fulfilled the study criteria. Of those, 269 patients were treated with uncoated devices without crossover to a paclitaxel-coated device during follow-up and 307 patients with DCB angioplasty. Mean (SD) follow-up was 46.48 (32.77) months. The mortality rate was 66.9% after POBA and 46.9% after DCB (P < .001). In the matched-pair cohort, 164 patients died after uncoated treatment (66.7%), and 119 in the DCB group died (48.4%; P < .001). There was no correlation between DCB length and mortality rate (P = .357). For the entire cohort, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed type of treatment (uncoated device vs DCB; P = .002), age (P < .001), stroke (P = .005), renal insufficiency (P = .014), and critical limb ischemia (P = .001) to be independent predictors of all-cause mortality. There was no significant difference in mortality among the paclitaxel exposure groups.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world retrospective analysis, the long-term mortality rate was lower after DCB angioplasty than after POBA of infrapopliteal lesions.

Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Angioplasty of Infra-popliteal Lesions for the Treatment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Study Protocol for the Randomized Controlled LIMES Study

PURPOSE

Evidence on efficacy and long-term safety of paclitaxel-coated devices is still conflicting. Therefore, this study aims to assess whether sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is safe and effective for the treatment of infra-popliteal occlusions in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

STUDY DESIGN

The randomized controlled, single-blinded, multicentre, investigator-initiated study aims to enrol 230 participants with CLTI and infra-popliteal occlusions at up to 25 centres. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty or to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Bailout stenting in case of flow-limiting dissection or ≥ 50% residual diameter stenosis is permitted.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome is the Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency at 6 months, defined as the absence of target lesion occlusion with restoration of in-line flow to the ankle. Key secondary outcome is non-inferiority in the proportionate occurrence of major adverse limb events and perioperative all-cause death at 30 days. Overall, participants will be followed for 36 months to assess further secondary efficacy and safety outcomes.

ASSUMED GAIN OF KNOWLEDGE

If sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty turns out to be superior to uncoated-balloon angioplasty regarding patency of infra-popliteal lesions without safety signals, it could become a welcome treatment option for patients with CLTI. Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT04772300, German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00024629. Level of Evidence Level 2a, randomized controlled trial.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Drug-Coated Balloons and Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Artery Disease

Limited data is available regarding the safety and effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus conventional percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of critical limb ischemia because of infrapopliteal peripheral arterial disease. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of DCB in the treatment of infrapopliteal disease. A database search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed by 2 reviewers from inception through November 15, 2021. Randomized trials that compared DCB with conventional PTA in treating infrapopliteal arterial disease were included. The risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. A total of 9 trials were included (1,501 participants) in the study. The mean age was 71.1 ± 10.2 years. Regarding the primary end points, treating infrapopliteal arterial disease with DCB had a lower incidence of re-stenosis (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.70, p = 0.0001) with no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.69, p = 0.61), compared with conventional PTA. With regards to the secondary end points, DCB usage was associated with a significant reduction in clinically driven target lesion revascularization (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84, p = 0.006) with no significant difference with regards to major target limb amputation and major adverse cardiovascular events (p ≥0.05). In conclusion, among patients with critical limb ischemia secondary to infrapopliteal artery disease, DCB usage was associated with a significantly lower number of restenosis and clinically driven target lesion revascularization compared with conventional PTA. There was no increase in all-cause mortality or major target limb amputation with the use of DCB.

Medikamentenbeschichtete Ballons bei PAVK

Paclitaxel-beschichtete Ballons bei femoropoplitealen Läsionen Für die Behandlung femoropoplitealer Gefäßläsionen, bei Verschlusslängen unter 25 cm sowie bei längeren Verschlüssen (wenn kein Venenmaterial vorliegt und/oder das Operationsrisiko hoch ist), wird die endovaskuläre Therapie empfohlen. Um Restenosierungen und Reinterventionen zu vermeiden, wird dabei die Verwendung von medikamentenbeschichteten Ballons empfohlen. Durch die Weiterentwicklung des Ballondesigns kann die Effektivität noch gesteigert werden.

Paclitaxel-beschichtete Ballons bei infrapoplitealen Läsionen Im Stadium der kritischen Extremitäten-Ischämie wird bei infrapoplitealen Gefäßläsionen primär ebenfalls ein endovaskulärer Therapieansatz empfohlen. Aufgrund von inkonsistenten, teilweise widersprüchlichen Ergebnissen verschiedener klinischer Studien, kann der Vorteil medikamentenbeschichteter Ballons bei der Angioplastie infrapoplitealer Arterien bislang nicht ausreichend beurteilt werden.

Sicherheitsaspekt Paclitaxel-beschichteter Ballons Zahlreiche Real-World-Studien und Nachauswertungen prospektiver Studien konnten den in einer früheren Metaanalyse postulierten Zusammenhang einer höheren Mortalität nach Anwendung Paclitaxel-beschichteter Devices weder bestätigen noch einen möglichen Pathomechanismus oder eine Dosis-Wirkungs-Beziehung aufzeigen. Dennoch wurden die Empfehlungen des Bundesinstituts für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM) zur sorgfältigen Nutzen-Risiko-Abwägung und Aufklärungspflicht noch nicht angepasst.

Sirolimus-beschichtete Ballons Mit dem Zytostatikum Sirolimus steht eine weitere antiproliferativ und zusätzlich antientzündlich wirkende Substanz zur Vermeidung von Restenosierungen bei femoropoplitealen und infrapoplitealen Läsionen zur Verfügung. Die therapeutische Breite von Sirolimus ist zwar größer als die von Paclitaxel, dennoch ist die Gewebeabsorption und -retention von Sirolimus deutlich schwieriger. Erste Ergebnisse aus kleineren Studien, die die Sicherheit und Effektivität Sirolimus-beschichteter Ballons untersuchten, sind vielversprechend, müssen allerdings noch in großen, prospektiven, randomisierten Studien bewiesen werden.

Drug-coated balloons in below-the-knee arteries

Background: The search for an optimal interventional treatment strategy in infrapopliteal peripheral artery disease remains in the focus of interest. Whether drug-coated balloons (DCB) might enhance interventional outcomes after crural interventions is a matter of debate, as studies yielded conflicting results on DCB safety and efficacy. Patients and methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 75 infrapopliteal DCB interventions performed at our institution in 68 patients with peripheral artery disease in Rutherford category 3 to 6. Results: Despite a high rate of long complex lesions and multi-vessel disease, freedom from clinically driven target lesions revascularization (TLR) after 365 days was 68%. After six months, healing or significant improvement of the ischemic ulcer was observed in 78% of cases. Accordingly, freedom from major amputation and death after 365 days was 82%. Freedom from major amputation and death was 76.2% of cases in patients with diabetes mellitus as opposed to 91.5% in patients without diabetes mellitus (p=0.049). Conclusions: With this real-world analysis we would like to contribute to the ongoing discussion on the benefit and safety of DCB treatment in below-the-knee interventions.

Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon in the Treatment of Below-The-Knee Artery: A Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chronic limb threat ischemia is associated with cardiovascular events, resulting in high amputation, morbidity and mortality rates. This study aims to accomplish a comprehensive summary of randomized controlled trials and single-center trials related to drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of below-the-knee (BTK) artery disease, and to provide a recommendation for the application of DCBs in BTK artery disease.

METHODS

Five electronic databases were used to retrieve relevant articles on the safety and effectiveness of DCBs in the treatment of BTK artery disease. A random-effects model was applied to calculate the standard mean deviation, odds ratio (OR) and their 95% of confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

As of April 8, 2021, a total of 241 articles were retrieved, but only 13 articles were finally included for meta-analysis. The 12 mo follow-up study found that major adverse events , all-cause mortality, major amputation ,and target lesion revascularization had no statistically significant difference between the DCBs group and the control group (target lesion revascularization: OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.36, 1.31; all-cause mortality: OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.69, 2.46; major amputation: OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.64, 2.79; target lesion revascularization: OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.35, 1.45).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis results of randomized controlled trials focusing on comparing DCBs and other treatments suggest that DCBs do not have significant advantages in the treatment of BTK artery disease when compare with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), but better than control intervention except PTA in both safety and efficacy end points. However, the results of meta-analysis of single-arm trial reported DCBs in treating BTK artery lesions are significantly improved compared with the meta-analysis concentrating on PTA.

Increased thrombogenicity is associated with revascularization outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVES

Clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) frequently occurs after endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The total thrombus-formation analysis system (T-TAS) can quantitatively evaluate thrombogenicity. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the association of T-TAS parameters with CD-TLR.

METHODS

We analyzed 34 CLTI patients and 62 Non-CLTI patients who underwent EVT. Blood samples collected on the day of EVT were used in T-TAS to compute the thrombus formation area under the curve (PL₂₄-AUC₁₀ in the platelet chip and AR₁₀-AUC₃₀ in the atheroma chip). After the EVT procedure, clinical follow-up was performed, and the presence of CD-TLR was assessed.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period (median 574 days), 10 patients (29%) in the CLTI group and 11 patients (18%) in the Non-CLTI group showed CD-TLR. In the CLTI group, patients who showed CD-TLR had a higher AR₁₀-AUC₃₀ than those who did not (1694 [1657, 1799] vs. 1561 [1412, 1697], p=0.01). In contrast, the PL₂₄-AUC₁₀ showed no significant differences depending on CD-TLR in both groups. For the CLTI patients, multivariable Cox regression analysis using propensity scores revealed that the AR₁₀-AUC₃₀ was an independent predictor of CD-TLR even after adjusting for baseline demographics, lesion characteristics, and anticoagulant use (HR=2.04, 95%CI=1.18-3.88, p=0.01; per 100 increase). In contrast, in Non-CLTI patients, neither the AR₁₀-AUC₃₀ and nor the PL₂₄-AUC₁₀ was significantly associated with CD-TLR. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis identified an AR₁₀-AUC₃₀ level of 1646 as an optimal cutoff value to predict CD-TLR (AUC = 0.85, sensitivity = 0.93, specificity = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

In CLTI patients, but not in Non-CLTI patients, the AR₁₀-AUC₃₀ showed a potential to predict CD-TLR. This finding suggests that hypercoagulability may play a predominant role in the progression of CLTI and anticoagulants may be useful in preventing revascularization.

Paclitaxel-coated balloons versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for infrapopliteal chronic total occlusions: the IN.PACT BTK randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Data are mixed concerning the safety and effectiveness of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for treating below-the-knee (BTK) lesions.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of the IN.PACT 014 paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for infrapopliteal chronic total occlusions (CTOs) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI).

METHODS

The IN.PACT BTK randomised study is a prospective, multicentre, randomised pilot study. Fifty CLTI participants (Rutherford clinical category 4-5) with BTK CTOs were randomised 1:1 to DCB (N=23) or PTA (N=27). The primary effectiveness endpoint was late lumen loss (LLL) at 9 months post procedure. Safety outcomes up to 9 months included all-cause mortality, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR).

RESULTS

Mean lesion length was 215.41±83.81 mm in the DCB group and 218.19±80.43 mm for PTA (p=0.806). The 9-month angiographic LLL was 0.892±0.774 mm for the DCB group and 1.312±0.720 mm for the PTA group (p=0.070) in a classic analysis, and 0.592±0.944 mm for DCB and 1.260±0.810 mm for PTA (p=0.017) in a subsegmental analysis. The Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from CD-TLR up to 9 months was 91.1% for DCB and 91.8% for PTA (log-rank p=0.942). At 9 months, 1 patient died in the DCB group and 2 in the PTA group (p=1.000); there were no major target limb amputations in either arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The 9-month subsegmental LLL was lower after treatment with the IN.PACT 014 DCB compared with PTA with no differences in safety or revascularisation events in a small complex population of patients with BTK CTOs.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT02963649.

Drug-Eluting Balloon for Below the Knee Angioplasty: Five-Year Outcome of the DEBATE-BTK Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the 5-year clinical outcome of the DEBATE-BTK (Drug-eluting balloon for below-the-knee angioplasty evaluation) trial.

METHODS

The DEBATE-BTK was a single-center, randomized trial that enrolled 132 diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to DCB or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Major clinical endpoints were, freedom from all-cause death, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CDTLR) and the occurrence of major amputation. Additional analysis were conducted to assess overall survival in patients treated with DCB compared to those treated with only POBA in the entire 5-years period and to test the correlation between paclitaxel dose exposure (in terciles) and overall survival.

RESULTS

Freedom from all-cause death at 5 years was 63.1% (41/65) in DCB vs. 53.7%(35/67) POBA patients (p = 0.4). Freedom from CDTLR was 82% in DCB and 63% in POBA patients (p = 0.002) at 1 year and 63 versus 54% at 5 years respectively P = 0.07. One patient in DCB and 2 patients in POBA underwent a major amputation of the target limb. During the 5-year follow-up, 24 patients originally randomized to POBA received DCB treatment for additional limb revascularization. According to DCB treatment in all the 5 years period, overall survival was 66.3.% (30/89) in DCB versus 40%(26/43) in POBA patients, p = 0.003.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival at 5-year was similar in DCB treated patients compared to POBA. Moreover, survival was higher in patients that received DCB angioplasty at any time of the 5 years period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1b, Individual inception cohort study with > 80% follow-up.

Editor's Choice - Risk of Major Amputation Following Application of Paclitaxel Coated Balloons in the Lower Limb Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

There have been concerns about the long term safety of paclitaxel coated devices in the lower limbs. A formal systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to examine the long term risk of major amputation using paclitaxel coated balloons in peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

METHOD

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (ID 227761). A broad bibliographic search was performed for RCTs investigating paclitaxel coated balloons in the peripheral arteries (femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal) for treatment of intermittent claudication or critical limb ischaemia (CLI). The literature search was last updated on 20 February 2021 without any restrictions on publication language, date, or status. Major amputations were analysed with time to event methods employing one and two stage models. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses, combinatorial meta-analysis, and a multivariable dose response meta-analysis to examine presence of a biological gradient were also performed.

RESULTS

In all, 21 RCTs with 3 760 lower limbs were analysed (52% intermittent claudication and 48% CLI; median follow up two years). There were 87 major amputations of 2 216 limbs in the paclitaxel arms (4.0% crude risk) compared with 41 major amputations in 1 544 limbs in the control arms (2.7% crude risk). The risk of major amputation was significantly higher for paclitaxel coated balloons with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.66 (95% CI 1.14 - 2.42; p = .008, one stage stratified Cox model). The prediction interval was 95% CI 1.10 - 2.46 (two stage model). The observed amputation risk was consistent for both femoropopliteal (p = .055) and infrapopliteal (p = .055) vessels. Number needed to harm was 35 for CLI. There was good evidence of a significant non-linear dose response relationship with accelerated risk per cumulative paclitaxel dose (chi square model p = .007). There was no evidence of publication bias (p = .80) and no significant statistical heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 0%, p = .77). Results were stable across sensitivity analyses (different models and subgroups based on anatomy and clinical indication and excluding unpublished trials). There were no influential single trials. Level of certainty in evidence was downrated from high to moderate because of sparse events in some studies.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be heightened risk of major amputation after use of paclitaxel coated balloons in the peripheral arteries. Further investigations are warranted urgently.

Endovascular treatment of high-risk peripheral vascular occlusive lesions: a review of current evidence and emerging applications of intravascular lithotripsy, atherectomy, and paclitaxel-coated devices

Endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease has evolved and expanded rapidly over the last 20 years. New technologies have increased the diversity of devices available and have made it possible to approach even the most challenging and high-risk lesions using endovascular techniques. In this review, we examine the clinical evidence available for several categories of endovascular devices available to treat peripheral arterial disease, including intravascular lithotripsy, atherectomy, and drug-coated devices. The best application for some technologies, such as intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomies, have yet to be identified. In contrast, drug-coated devices have an established role in patients at high risk for long-term failure, but have been the subject of much controversy, given recent concerns about possible adverse effects of paclitaxel. Future investigation should further assess these technologies in patients with complex disease using updated staging systems and outcomes with direct clinical relevance, such as functional improvement, wound healing, and freedom from recurrent symptoms.

Prospective Study of Serration Angioplasty in the Infrapopliteal Arteries Using the Serranator Device: PRELUDE BTK Study

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Serranator percutaneous transluminal angioplasty serration balloon catheter in patients with infrapopliteal peripheral artery disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, single-arm feasibility study in 46 patients with claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia, Rutherford Clinical Category (RCC) 3 to 5, that required treatment of the infrapopliteal arteries above the tibiotalar joint. The primary efficacy outcome was device success-successful insertion, balloon inflation and deflation, and removal of the device(s) with a final diameter stenosis of <50%. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of major adverse limb events (MALE) and perioperative death (POD) through 30 day postprocedure. Other outcomes were change in RCC and ankle-brachial index, wound healing, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). A subset of 9 patients were further evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for the presence of serrations in treated lesions. Patient follow-up occurred at 30 days and 6 months.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients received treatment with the Serranator device and 55 lesions were treated. Fifty-three lesions were deemed analyzable by the core lab with data and reported hereafter. Device success was 91.7% and freedom from MALE + POD through 30 days was 95.7%. Pretreatment stenosis of 82% was reduced to 21.8% and only 1 lesion (1.9%) required a bailout stent for a grade D dissection. The average maximum balloon inflation pressure was 6 atmospheres. Serrations were present in all treated lesions (n=10) in 9 patients imaged with OCT/IVUS as reviewed by the core laboratory. The RCC score improved by 1 or more level in 70% of patients at 6 months with 42% having a score of 0. The 6 month freedom from CD-TLR was 97.7%.

CONCLUSION

Serranator treatment of infrapopliteal lesions showed excellent lumen gain with minimal evidence of arterial injury and low 6 month CD-TLR. Imaging by IVUS and OCT showed serrations without significant dissection, supporting the device's proposed mechanism of action.

Catheter based interventions for lower extremity peripheral artery disease

The field of peripheral arterial intervention has exploded over the past 20 years. Current knowledge includes a growing evidence base for treatment as well as a myriad of new interventional approaches to complex disease. This review seeks to outline the current state of the art for interventional approaches to lower extremity peripheral arterial disease.

Nanospheres encapsulated everolimus delivery into arterial wall-the tissue pharmacokinetics and vascular response experimental study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile and tissue effects of everolimus delivered into arterial wall using biodegradable nanospheres.

BACKGROUND

Delivery of everolimus into the arterial wall is challenging due to its low-lipophilic profile.

METHODS

A pharmacokinetic study included 28 porcine coronary arterial segments initially injured with balloon angioplasty followed by the local delivery of everolimus encapsulated in nanospheres (EEN) via injection through a microporous delivery catheter. The animals were sacrificed at 1 hour, 1,7,28, and 90-day follow-up. In the tissue effects study 16 coronary bare metal stent (BMS) were implanted following EEN delivery, 15 BMS following nanospheres delivery without the drug (reference group) and 16 implanted BMS served as a control. Angiographic and histology follow-up was scheduled at 28 and 90-day.

RESULTS

The study showed high-everolimus concentrations in arterial tissue early after nanoparticles delivery followed by its gradual decrease to 1.15 ± 0.40 ng/mg at 90 days. Histology analysis showed favorable biocompatibility and healing profile with comparable area stenosis between groups at both time-points.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates for the first time the safety, biocompatibility, and long-term retention of everolimus in arterial tissue after single local delivery of biodegradable nanospheres.

Excimer laser atherectomy combined with drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in ischemic diabetic foot: 24-month outcomes

There are few studies on excimer laser (308 nm) atherectomy in the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the efficacy and safety of excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) in combination with adjuvant drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) compared to DCB for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in patients with ischemic diabetic foot. From September 2018 to February 2019, a total of 79 patients with diabetic foot were treated for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization at Tianjin First Central Hospital (Tianjin, China). In this project, 35 patients were treated with ELA combined with DCB angioplasty, and 44 patients were treated with DCB angioplasty. The patients' baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The primary efficacy endpoints through 24 months were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), wound healing rate, major amputation rate, and target vessel patency rate. The primary safety endpoint through 24 months was all-cause mortality. The primary efficacy results at 24 months of ELA + DCB versus DCB were CD-TLR of 14.3% versus 34.1% (p = 0.044), wound healing rate of 88.6% versus 65.9% (p = 0.019), target vessel patency rate of 80.0% versus 52.3% (p = 0.010), and major amputations rate of 5.7% versus 22.7% (p = 0.036). The safety signal at 24 months of all-cause mortality rate was 2.9% for ELA + DCB group and 4.5% for DCB group (p = 0.957). ELA combined with DCB angioplasty is more effective than DCB in the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease in patients with ischemic diabetic foot, which can improve the wound healing rate and target vessel patency rate. There was no statistical difference in the safety results between the two groups.

Validation of the correlation between angiosome-based target arterial path, mid-term limb-based patency, and the global limb anatomical staging system

This study aimed to validate the correlation between the Global Limb Anatomical Staging System (GLASS) and limb-based patency (LBP) and angiosome-based target arterial path (TAP) and to detect the predictors of LBP loss. After the publication of the Global Vascular Guidelines in 2019, the evaluation of GLASS and identification of TAP have been recommended. However, there are few reports regarding GLASS. Eighty-three patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and tissue loss from 2016 to 2020 were evaluated. The correlation between GLASS and LBP and successful revascularization of angiosome-based TAP was analyzed. We also investigated the predictors of LBP loss. The number of patients in each GLASS stage was as follows: GLASS I, 6 patients; GLASS II, 15 patients; GLASS III, 62 patients. At 6 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of LBP was 66.7% in GLASS I, 41.6% in GLASS II, and 16.4% in GLASS III, respectively (p = 0.034). The rate of successful revascularization of angiosome-based TAP was 100% in GLASS I, 86.7% in GLASS II, and 46.8% in GLASS III, respectively (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage [hazard ratio (HR) 1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-2.33; p = 0.021] and GLASS infrapopliteal (IP) grade (HR 1.96; 95% CI 1.31-2.95; p = 0.001) were the independent predictors of LBP loss. The GLASS stage was significantly correlated with successful revascularization of angiosome-based TAP and mid-term LBP. The WIfI stage and GLASS IP grade were the independent predictors of loss of LBP.

Mortality Following Treatment with Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in Real World Utilization: Correlation to Total Lifetime Dosage?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the all-cause mortality after treatment with paclitaxel-coated devices depending on paclitaxel exposure in real-world practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of mortality of patients with at least a 3-year follow-up was performed. Patients were categorized into terciles according to the paclitaxel dosage received during the index procedure and every subsequent intervention. The incidence of mortality of these patients was compared with that of a paclitaxel-naïve control group.

RESULTS

In total, 2,376 patients were treated with drug-coated devices and 980 patients with uncoated devices. The overall all-cause mortality rate at a mean follow-up of 46.27 months ± 24.71 was 29.2% (n = 696) for the paclitaxel group and 49.4% (n = 484) for the paclitaxel-naive control group. The mortality rate between the groups according to the initial paclitaxel exposure was not significantly different (P = .205). In comparison to the group of surviving patients, the total lifetime paclitaxel dosage was lower in the group of patients who died (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world retrospective analysis, long-term mortality was not correlated with the paclitaxel exposure during the index procedure. Regarding the total paclitaxel exposure, lower mortality was observed in the highest tercile of paclitaxel exposure.

Macrophage Polarization as a Novel Therapeutic Target for Endovascular Intervention in Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) has a significant impact on human health, affecting 200 million people globally. Advanced PAD severely diminishes quality of life, affecting mobility, and in its most severe form leads to limb amputation and death. Treatment of PAD is among the least effective of all endovascular procedures in terms of long-term efficacy. Chronic inflammation is a key driver of PAD; however, stents and coated balloons eluting antiproliferative drugs are most commonly used. As a result, neither stents nor coated balloons produce durable clinical outcomes in the superficial femoral artery, and both have recently been associated with significantly increased mortality. This review summarizes the most common clinical approaches and limitations to treating PAD and highlights the necessity to address the underlying causes of inflammation, identifying macrophages as a novel therapeutic target in the next generation of endovascular PAD intervention.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Treating Below-the-Knee Arteries in Critical Limb Ischemia: The SINGA-PACLI Trial

Background There is a paucity of randomized trials demonstrating superior efficacy of drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) compared with conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for below-the-knee arterial disease in patients with -critical limb ischemia. Purpose To compare DCBA versus PTA for below-the-knee lesions in participants with critical limb ischemia through 12 months. Materials and Methods In this prospective, randomized, two-center, double-blind superiority study, participants with critical limb ischemia with rest pain or tissue loss with atherosclerotic disease in the native below-the-knee arteries were randomly assigned (in a one-to-one ratio) to DCBA or PTA after stratification for diabetes and renal failure between November 2013 and October 2017. The primary efficacy end point was angiographic primary patency at 6 months analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary end points through 12 months were composed of major adverse events including death and major amputations, wound healing, limb salvage, clinically driven target-lesion revascularization, and amputation-free survival. Primary and binary secondary end points, analyzed by using generalized-linear model and time-to-event analyses, were estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hazard ratios (Cox regression). Results Seventy participants (mean age, 61 years ± 10 [standard deviation]; 43 men) in the DCBA group and 68 (mean age, 64 years ± 10; 50 men) in the PTA group were evaluated. The percentage of patients with angiographic primary patency at 6 months was 43% (30 of 70) in the DCBA group and 38% (26 of 68) in the PTA group (P = .48). Through 12 months, the percentage of deaths was similar: 21% in the DCBA group and 16% in the PTA group (P = .43). Amputation-free survival rate assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves differed through 12 months: 59% (41 of 70) in the DCBA group compared with 78% (53 of 68) in the PTA group (P = .01). Conclusion In participants with critical limb ischemia, the drug-coated balloon angioplasty group and the conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group had similar primary patency rates at 6 months after treatment of below-the-knee arteries. Amputation-free survival rates through 12 months were higher in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Advances in Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease: Revascularization in PAD

Effective revascularization of the patient with peripheral artery disease is about more than the procedure. The approach to the patient with symptom-limiting intermittent claudication or limb-threatening ischemia begins with understanding the population at risk and variation in clinical presentation. The urgency of revascularization varies significantly by presentation; from patients with intermittent claudication who should undergo structured exercise rehabilitation before revascularization (if needed) to those with acute limb ischemia, a medical emergency, who require revascularization within hours. Recent years have seen the rapid development of new tools including wires, catheters, drug-eluting technology, specialized balloons, and biomimetic stents. Open surgical bypass remains an important option for those with advanced disease. The strategy and techniques employed vary by clinical presentation, lesion location, and lesion severity. There is limited level 1 evidence to guide practice, but factors that determine technical success and anatomic durability are largely understood and incorporated into decision-making. Following revascularization, medical therapy to reduce adverse limb outcomes and a surveillance plan should be put in place. There are many hurdles to overcome to improve the efficacy of lower extremity revascularization, such as restenosis, calcification, microvascular disease, silent embolization, and tools for perfusion assessment. This review highlights the current state of revascularization in peripheral artery disease with an eye toward technologies at the cusp, which may significantly impact current practice.

Atherectomy and Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Long Infrapopliteal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

[Figure: see text].

The Rollercoaster of Paclitaxel in the Lower Limbs and Skeletons in the Closet: An Opinion Review

There have been concerns about the long-term risk of all-cause death with the use of paclitaxel-coated devices in the lower limbs. Results from a 2018 meta-analysis were corroborated by the US Food and Drug Administration and later confirmed by an individual patient data meta-analysis. However, population-based observational studies have produced contradictory results and often claimed a survival benefit with the use of paclitaxel. The recently published Swedish drug-elution trial in peripheral arterial disease did not confirm a significant mortality risk. In this review, the authors discuss the key elements of the identified mortality signal and stress important facts and figures that remain underrecognized and elusive. They also highlight the important types of epidemiological bias that pertain to the ongoing debate on paclitaxel.

[Current Strategy in Endovascular Management for Below-the-Knee Arterial Lesions]

The below-the-knee arterial tree is the thinnest of all the leg vessels and is an important path for blood flow to the foot. Hence, lesions including stenosis, especially obstruction, may lead to critical limb ischemia which represents the most severe clinical manifestation of peripheral arterial disease. It is characterized by the presence of ischemic rest pain, ischemic lesions, or gangrene attributable to the objectively proven arterial occlusive disease. Typically, the atherosclerotic disease process involving the below-the-knee arterial tree is diffuse in the majority of patients. The cornerstone of therapy is vascular reconstruction and limb salvage. Revascularization should be attempted whenever technically possible, without delay, in patients presenting critical limb ischemia and when the clinical status is not hopelessly non-ambulatory. Therefore, endovascular treatment can become the gold standard for the full range of patients including below-the-knee, limiting the clinical role of the classically trained surgeons.

Downstream Paclitaxel Released Following Drug-Coated Balloon Inflation and Distal Limb Wound Healing in Swine

•

PCBs are a clinically proven antirestenotic alternative to plain percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of superficial femoral arteries but their application in critical limb ischemia is inhibited by the concern that the downstream release of particulate paclitaxel may negatively impact distal lower limb’s circulation and its tissues already compromised by chronic ischemia.

•

To investigate this concern experimentally, we used an animal model of standardized distal limb wounds to determine the effect of downstream paclitaxel released during PCB treatment of superficial femoral arteries on distal wound healing process.

•

A clinically relevant concentration of paclitaxel in the vicinity of the wound did not impair the healing of preexisting distal cutaneous lesions in healthy swine even after multiple PCB deployments.

The authors evaluated the presence of paclitaxel and healing of distal hind limb wounds created in 27 swine using biopsy punches followed by paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) use in the iliofemoral arteries of healthy swine. After 14 and 28 days, no differences were seen in time course, appearance, and histopathology of wound healing between the single or triple PCB and uncoated balloon treatment despite clinically relevant paclitaxel concentrations in the skin adjacent to the healing wounds. Presence of paclitaxel downstream from the PCB treatment site does not impair the wound healing response of preexisting distal cutaneous lesions in healthy swine.