Supraventricular Arrhythmia Following Patent Foramen Ovale Percutaneous Closure

Percutaneous suture-based patent foramen ovale closure: A state-of-the-art review

Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), a common variation of interatrial septum anatomy, is a commonly performed procedure in the catheterization laboratory to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in selected patients and to treat other PFO-related syndromes. In the last twenty years, disc-based devices have represented the armamentarium of the interventional cardiologist; recently, suture-based devices have become an attractive alternative, despite limited data regarding their long-term performance. The present review gives an overview of the current evidence regarding suture-based PFO closure, the device's characteristics, the echocardiographic evaluation of the PFO anatomy, and recommendations for patient selection. A detailed procedural guide is then provided, and potential complications and future developments in the field are discussed.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: Brain-Heart Board Experience

Background and Objectives

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in approximately 25% of adult population. The prevalence of PFO is high in patients with cryptogenic stroke suggesting paradoxical embolism. PFO closure in carefully selected patients is an effective secondary preventive strategy in these patients. We report predictors of management recommendations by the multidisciplinary Board and their impact on outcomes.

Methods

Brain-Heart Board comprises vascular and interventional neurology and cardiology subspecialties (structural, electrophysiology, and cardiac imaging). Adult patients referred to the Board for consideration of PFO closure between October 2017 to March 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. Demographics, comorbid conditions, risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score, event frequencies (transient ischemic attack [TIA] or stroke, intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], post-PFO closure cardiac arrhythmias), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 1 year were compared between the groups (PFO closure vs medical management). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with management recommendation and chi-square tests to test differences in outcomes for patients according to management.

Results

Two hundred seventy patients (229 stroke; 41 TIA) were discussed by the Board for PFO closure. 119 (44.0%) patients were recommended for PFO closure of which 117 (98.3%) had evidence of ischemic infarct on imaging. In univariate analysis, age was similar (50 ± 11.9 vs 52 ± 12.8, p = 0.17), but RoPE score was higher in closure as compared with the medical management group (6 [IQR 5-7] vs 5 [IQR 4-7], p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, TIA as the index event was an independent predictor of Board recommendation against PFO closure (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.19, p < 0.05). Event frequency was low in both cohorts (5.9% vs 4.8%, p > 0.05) and comprised cardiac arrhythmias (6 cases of atrial fibrillation and 1 ICH in closure group; 1 TIA and 1 recurrent stroke in medical management group). Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) was similar in both cohorts (66.3% vs 70.7%, p > 0.05) at 1 year.

Discussion

Multidisciplinary Brain-Heart Board provides a clinical practice model of collaborative care to ensure proper patient selection for PFO closure. TIA as the index event is associated with recommendation of medical management by the multidisciplinary Brain-Heart Board.

The Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Detected by Implantable Loop Recorders

Background

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is seen in 25% of the general population but in up to 50% of patients ≤60 years old with cryptogenic strokes. Trials have shown that PFO closure vs medical therapy reduces the risk of future strokes. PFO closure may cause atrial fibrillation (AF), with prior trials reporting an incidence of 2% to 11.9%. However, the true incidence of AF after PFO closure is unknown due to limitations in prior studies for long-term monitoring.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study at a single center. Patients who underwent PFO closure and had an implantable loop recorder prior to PFO closure were included. The final review included 38 patients who had at least 2 months of implantable loop recorder data post-PFO closure.

Results

Ten out of 38 (26%) patients developed AF post-PFO closure. The median time to the first episode of AF was 3.95 weeks, with 40% having their first AF episode after 3 months. Median duration of AF episodes was 1 hour. One hundred percent had spontaneous termination of AF. Of the AF patients, 70% were started on oral anticoagulant therapy.

Conclusions

Our review shows a higher incidence of AF post-PFO closure as compared with most reported prior studies. We recommend larger prospective studies to explore the true incidence of AF post-PFO closure, its clinical impact, and subsequent stroke risk.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patent foramen ovale (PFO) after stroke

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is frequently identified in young patients with cryptogenic ischaemic stroke. Potential stroke mechanisms include paradoxical embolism from a venous clot which traverses the PFO, in situ clot formation within the PFO, and atrial arrhythmias due to electrical signalling disruption. The purpose of this guideline is to provide recommendations for diagnosing, treating, and long-term managing patients with ischaemic stroke and PFO. Conversely, Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) was not considered an index event in this context because only one RCT involved TIA patients. However, this subgroup analysis showed no significant differences between TIA and stroke outcomes. The working group identified questions and outcomes, graded evidence, and developed recommendations following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedure for guideline development. This document underwent peer-review by independent experts and members of the ESO Guideline Board and Executive Committee. The working group acknowledges the current evidentiary gap in delineating an unequivocal diagnostic algorithm for the detection of PFO. Although transoesophageal echocardiography is conventionally held as the most accurate diagnostic tool for PFO identification, its status as the 'gold standard' remains unsubstantiated by rigorously validated evidence. We found high-quality evidence to recommend PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy in selected patients aged 18-60 years in whom no other evident cause of stroke is found but a PFO (i.e. PFO-associated stroke). The PASCAL classification system can be used to select such candidates for PFO closure. Patients with both a large right-to-left shunt and an atrial septal aneurysm benefit most from PFO closure. There is insufficient evidence to make an evidence-based recommendation on PFO closure in patients older than 60 and younger than 18 years. We found low quality evidence to suggest against PFO closure in patients with unlikely PFO-related stroke according to the PASCAL classification, except in specific scenarios (Expert Consensus). We suggest against long-term anticoagulation in patients with PFO-associated stroke unless anticoagulation is indicated for other medical reasons. Regarding the long-term AF monitoring after PFO closure, the working group concluded that there remains significant uncertainty regarding the risks and benefits associated with the use of long-term cardiac monitoring, such as implantable loop recorders. This document provides additional guidance, in the form of evidence-based recommendations or expert consensus statements, on diagnostic methods for PFO detection, and medical management after PFO closure.

Atrial Fibrillation After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Incidence, Pathophysiology, and Management

This comprehensive review explores the incidence, pathophysiology, and management of atrial fibrillation (AF) following percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO). Although AF is considered a common adverse event post PFO closure, its incidence, estimated at <5%, varies based on monitoring methods. The review delves into the challenging task of precisely estimating AF incidence, given subclinical AF and diverse diagnostic approaches. Notably, a temporal pattern emerges, with peak incidence around the 14th day after closure and a subsequent decline after the 45th day, mimicking general population AF trends. The pathophysiological mechanisms behind post PFO closure AF remain elusive, with proposed factors including local irritation, device-related interference, tissue stretch, and nickel hypersensitivity. Management considerations encompass rhythm control, with flecainide showing promise, and anticoagulation tailored to individual risk profiles. The authors advocate for a personalized approach, weighing factors like age, comorbidities, and device characteristics. Notably, postclosure AF is generally considered benign, often resolving spontaneously within 45 days, minimizing thromboembolic risks. Further studies are required to refine understanding and provide evidence-based guidelines.

Patent Foramen Ovale Management for Secondary Stroke Prevention: State-of-the-Art Appraisal of Current Evidence

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is frequently identified in young patients with ischemic stroke. Randomized controlled trials provide robust evidence supporting PFO closure in selected patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke; however, several questions remain unanswered. This report summarizes current knowledge on the epidemiology of PFO-associated stroke, the role of PFO as a cause of stroke, and anatomic high-risk features. We also comment on breakthrough developments in patient selection algorithms for PFO closure in relation to the PFO-associated stroke causal likelihood risk stratification system. We further highlight areas for future research in PFO-associated stroke including the efficacy and safety of PFO closure in the elderly population, incidence, and long-term consequences of atrial fibrillation post-PFO closure, generalizability of the results of clinical trials in the real world, and the need for assessing the effect of neurocardiology teams on adherence to international recommendations. Other important knowledge gaps such as sex, race/ethnicity, and regional disparities in access to diagnostic technologies, PFO closure devices, and clinical outcomes in the real world are also discussed as priority research topics.

Atrial function after percutaneous occluder device and suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis closure

Aims

Suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis (PFO) closure is a recent technique, achieving closure by means of a simple suture. The differences between traditional occluders and suture might have different impacts on atrial function. The aim of this study was to evaluate atrial function after PFO closure by direct suture and traditional occluders.

Methods and results

We prospectively studied 40 patients, 20 undergoing PFO closure by occluder and 20 by suture. Trans-thoracic echocardiography was carried out the day before and 1 year after the procedure. Left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) function was evaluated by using speckle-tracking analysis assessing the strain values of the reservoir (st-RES), conduit (st-CD), and contraction phase (st-CT). Compared with values baseline PFO closure, at 1-year follow-up, patients with occluder implantation had significantly worse indices of LA and RA reservoir (LA st-RES P < 0.001; RA st-RES P < 0.001), conduit (LA st-CD P < 0.001; RA st-CD P < 0.001), and contraction function (LA st-CT P < 0.05; RA st-CT P < 0.05). In patients with suture-mediated PFO closure, no significant differences were observed in the same indices of reservoir (LA st-RES P = 0.848; RA st-RES P = 0.183), conduit (LA st-CD P = 0.156; RA st-CD P = 0.419), and contraction function (LA st-CT P = 0.193; RA st-CT P = 0.375).

Conclusion

Suture-mediated PFO closure does not alter atrial function. Conversely, PFO closure by metallic occluders is associated with a deterioration of atrial function. This detrimental effect on atrial function could favour the development of atrial arrhythmias.

Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation or Arrhythmias After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

Background

Patients with a patent foramen ovale (PFO) who undergo percutaneous PFO closure are at a greater risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with patients whose PFOs are managed medically. Postclosure AF appears to be well tolerated if treated but may increase the risk for stroke. Postclosure AF is reported to occur in 3.7% to 7.4% of patients; however, incidence across devices remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the frequency of postclosure AF, atrial flutter, and arrhythmias in 6 PFO closure devices.

Methods

Four hundred forty-five patients underwent percutaneous PFO closure with appropriate follow-up between 2001 and 2021. The procedure was performed using Abbott Amplatzer PFO, Amplatzer ASD, Amplatzer Cribriform, NMT CardioSEAL, Gore Helex, or Gore Cardioform devices. Incidence of AF, atrial flutter, and arrhythmias were assessed by electrocardiogram within 6 months from closure. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated potential predictors of postclosure AF or atrial flutter.

Results

Postclosure AF or atrial flutter occurred in 30 patients (6.7%) within 6 months, and its incidence was significantly different across devices. Gore Cardioform had the greatest frequency of postclosure AF or atrial flutter events (16.8%) compared with other devices. The Gore Cardioform device, larger device sizes, and male sex were associated with greater risk of postclosure AF or atrial flutter.

Conclusions

Postclosure AF or atrial flutter was more likely to occur in the Gore Cardioform device, in males, and in patients who underwent PFO closure with larger devices. Although it is more effective for complete closure, the Gore Cardioform device was shown to be an independent predictor of postclosure AF or atrial flutter.

Cardiovascular Outcomes and Readmissions of Atrial Fibrillation Among Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder Device Recipients: A Propensity Matched National Readmission Study

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder devices are increasingly utilized in minimally invasive procedures used to treat cryptogenic stroke. Data on the impact of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) among PFO occluder device recipients are limited. The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried between 2016 and 2019 to identify PFO patients with and without AF. The 2 groups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate regression models. The outcomes included in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), Mechanical circulatory support use (MCS), Cardiogenic shock (CS), acute ischemic stroke, bleeding, and other cardiovascular outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA v. 17. Out of 6508 Weighted hospitalizations for PFO occluder device procedure over the study period, 877 (13.4%) had AF compared to 5631 (86.6%) who did not. On adjusted analysis, PFO with AF group had higher rates of MCS (PSM, 4.5% vs 2.2 %, P value = 0.011) and SCA (PSM, 7.6% vs 4.6 %, P value = 0.015) compared to PFO with no AF. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of in-hospital mortality (PSM, 5.4% vs 6.4 %, P value = 0.39), CS (PSM, 8.3% vs 5.9 %, P value = 0.075), AKI (PSM, 32.4% vs 32.3 %, P value = 0.96), bleeding (PSM, 2.08% vs 1.3%, P value = 0.235) or the readmission rates among both cohorts. Additionally, AF was associated with higher hospital length of stay (9.5 ± 13.2 vs 8.2 ± 24.3 days, P-value = 0.012) and total cost ($66,513 ± $80,922 vs $52,013±$125,136, 0.025, P-value = 0.025) compared to PFO without AF. AF among PFO occluder device recipients is associated with increased adverse outcomes, including MCS use and SCA, with no difference in mortality and readmission rates among both cohorts. Long-term follow-up needs further studies.

Patent Foramen Ovale Percutaneous Closure: Evolution and Ongoing Challenges

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) concerns nearly a quarter of the general population and incidence may reach up to 50% in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Recent randomized clinical trials confirmed that percutaneous closure of PFO-related stroke reduces the risk of embolic event recurrence. PFO also comes into play in other pathogenic conditions, such as migraine, decompression sickness or platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome, where the heterogeneity of patients is high and evidence for closure is less well-documented. In this review, we describe the current indications for PFO percutaneous closure and the remaining challenges, and try to provide future directions regarding the technique and its indications.

New-onset atrial fibrillation after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The exact incidence and predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to find post-procedural AF incidence rates and differences due to different screening strategies and devices.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Controlled trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included into this meta-analysis. The incidence of new-onset AF was the primary outcome. Further parameters were surveillance strategy, device type, AF treatment and neurological events. New AF was determined as early onset within one month after implantation and late thereafter.

RESULTS

8 controlled trials and 16 cohort studies were eligible for quantitative analysis. 7643 patients received percutaneous PFO closure after cryptogenic stroke or transient ischaemic attack, 117 with other indications, whereas 1792 patients formed the control group. Meta-analysis of controlled trials showed an AF incidence of 5.1% in the interventional and 1.6% in the conservative arm, respectively (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.46-6.86, P = 0.03, I2 = 55%). 4.7% received high-quality surveillance strategy with Holter-ECG or Loop recorder whereby AF incidence was overall higher compared to the low-quality group with 12-lead ECG only (3.3-15% vs. 0.2-4.3%). Heterogeneous results on time of AF onset were found, limited by different follow-up strategies. CardioSEAL and Starflex seemed to have higher AF incidences in early and late onset with 4.5% and 4.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous PFO closure led to higher AF post-procedural incidence compared to the conservative strategy. Heterogeneity in surveillance and follow-up strategy limited the generalizability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022359945).

Impact of the antiplatelet strategy following patent foramen ovale percutaneous closure

AIMS

Temporary dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended following patent foramen ovale (PFO) percutaneous closure although its benefit, compared to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), has not been demonstrated in this setting. We aimed at assessing outcomes following PFO closure according to the antiplatelet strategy at discharge.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ambispective AIR-FORCE cohort included consecutive patients from seven centres in France and Canada undergoing PFO closure and discharged without anticoagulation. Patients treated in French and Canadian centres were mostly discharged with DAPT and SAPT, respectively. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral embolism, myocardial infarction, or BARC type ≥2 bleeding with up to 5 years of follow-up. The impact of the antiplatelet strategy on outcomes was evaluated with a marginal Cox model (cluster analyses per country) with inverse probability weighting according to propensity score. A total of 1532 patients (42.2% female, median age: 49 [40-57] years) were included from 2001 to 2022, of whom 599 (39.1%) were discharged with SAPT and 933 (60.9%) with DAPT, for ≤3 months in 894/923 (96.9%) cases. After a median follow-up of 2.4 [1.1-4.4] years, a total of 58 events were observed. In the weighted analysis, the rate of the primary endpoint up to 5 years was 7.8% in the SAPT strategy and 7.3% in the DAPT strategy (weighted hazard ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.59-1.83).

CONCLUSION

The antiplatelet strategy following PFO closure did not seem to impact clinical outcomes, thus challenging the current recommendations of temporary DAPT.

Sex Differences in Patients With Cryptogenic Cerebrovascular Events Undergoing Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale

Background Scarce data exist on sex differences in patients with cryptogenic cerebrovascular events undergoing patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. This study aimed to determine the sex differences in clinical profile, procedural characteristics, and long-term outcomes of patients with cryptogenic cerebrovascular events undergoing PFO closure. Methods and Results A retrospective cohort was used, including 1076 consecutive patients undergoing PFO closure because of a cryptogenic cerebrovascular event. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 469 (43.6%) women and 607 (56.4%) men. The median follow-up was 3 years (interquartile range, 2-8 years). Women were younger (46±13 versus 50±12 years; P<0.01) and had a higher risk of paradoxical embolism score (6.9±1.7 versus 6.6±1.6; P<0.01). Procedural characteristics and postprocedural antithrombotic therapy were similar. At follow-up, there were no differences in atrial fibrillation (women versus men: 0.47 versus 0.97 per 100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.27-1.11]; P=0.095; adjusted P=0.901), stroke (0.17 versus 0.07 per 100 patient-years; IRR, 2.58 [95% CI, 0.47-14.1]; P=0.274; adjusted P=0.201), or transient ischemic attack (0.43 versus 0.18 per 100 patient-years; IRR, 2.58 [95% CI, 0.88-7.54]; P=0.084; adjusted P=0.121); nevertheless, women exhibited a higher incidence of combined ischemic cerebrovascular events (0.61 versus 0.26 per 100 patient-years; IRR, 2.58 [95% CI, 1.04-6.39]; P=0.041; adjusted P=0.028) and bleeding events (1.04 versus 0.45 per 100 patient-years; IRR, 2.82 [95% CI, 1.41-5.65]; P=0.003; adjusted P=0.004). Conclusions Compared with men, women with cryptogenic cerebrovascular events undergoing PFO closure were younger and had a higher risk of paradoxical embolism score. After a median follow-up of 3 years, there were no differences in stroke events, but women exhibited a higher rate of combined (stroke and transient ischemic attack) cerebrovascular events and bleeding complications. Additional studies are warranted to clarify sex-related outcomes after PFO closure further.

Long-term risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter after transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure: a nationwide Danish study

AIMS

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the recommended stroke prevention treatment in patients ≤60 years with cryptogenic ischemic stroke and PFO. Atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) is a known potential procedure-related complication, but long-term risk of developing AF remains unknown. This paper studied the long-term risk of developing AF following PFO closure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A Danish nationwide cohort study was conducted. During 2008-2020, this study identified a PFO closure cohort, a PFO diagnosis cohort without PFO closure, and a general population comparison cohort matched 10:1 to the PFO closure cohort on age and sex. The outcome was first-time AF diagnosis. Risk of AF and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of the association between PFO closure or PFO diagnosis and AF were calculated. A total of 817 patients with PFO closure, 1224 with PFO diagnosis, and 8170 matched individuals were identified. The 5 year risk of AF was 7.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.5-10] in the PFO closure cohort, 3.1% (95% CI: 2.0-4.2) in the PFO diagnosis cohort, and 1.2% (95% CI: 0.8-1.6) in the matched cohort. The HR of AF comparing PFO closure with PFO diagnosis was 2.3 (95% CI: 1.3-4.0) within the first 3 months and 0.7 (95% CI: 0.3-1.7) thereafter. The HR of AF comparing PFO closure with the matched cohort was 51 (95% CI: 21-125) within the first 3 months and 2.5 (95% CI: 1.2-5.0) thereafter.

CONCLUSION

Patent foramen ovale closure was not associated with any substantial increased long-term risk of developing AF beyond the well-known procedure-related short-term risk.

Recent progress in patent foramen ovale and related neurological diseases: A narrative review

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common congenital cardiac abnormality when the opening of the interatrial septum is not closed in adulthood. This abnormality affects 25% of the general population. With the development of precision medicine, an increasing number of clinical studies have reported that PFO is closely related to various neurological diseases such as stroke, migraine, obstructive sleep apnea, and decompression syndrome. It has also been suggested that PFO closure could be effective for preventing and treating these neurological diseases. Therefore, increasing attention has been given to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of PFO-related neurological diseases. By reviewing existing literature, this article focuses on the pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical characteristics of PFO-related neurological diseases, as well as the prevention and treatment of different neurological diseases to discuss, and aims to provide current progress for this field and decision-making evidence for clinical practice.

Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: Integrated Management

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common cardiac abnormality with a prevalence of 25% in the general population. PFO has been associated with the paradoxical embolism causing cryptogenic stroke and systemic embolization. Results from clinical trials, meta-analyses, and position papers support percutaneous PFO device closure (PPFOC), especially if interatrial septal aneurysms coexist and in the presence of large shunts in young patients. Remarkably, accurately evaluating patients to refer to the closure strategy is extremely important. However, the selection of patients for PFO closure is still not so clear. The aim of this review is to update and clarify which patients should be considered for closure treatment.

Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack

Limited data exist on patients with a transient ischemic attack (TIA) who underwent patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. The objectives of this study were to determine the clinical and procedural characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with TIA who underwent transcatheter PFO closure. This was a multicenter study including 1,012 consecutive patients who underwent PFO closure after a cerebrovascular event. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their index event leading to PFO closure: TIA (n = 183 [18%]), and stroke (n = 829 [82%]). The median follow-up was 3 (2 to 8) years (complete in 98% of patients). There were no significant differences between patients with TIA and stroke, except for a lower Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score in the TIA group (6.1 vs 6.9 in the stroke group, p <0.001). PFO closure was successful in all patients with a low rate of complications (<1%) in both groups. There were no differences in the incidence of neurologic events during long-term follow-up. There was 1 stroke event in the TIA group and 6 in the stroke group (0.08 vs 0.17 per 100 patients-years, p = 0.584). There were 2 TIA events in the TIA group and 10 in the stroke group (0.17 vs 0.28 per 100 patients-years, p = 0.557). In conclusion, our study showed that patients with TIA who underwent PFO closure have similar clinical characteristics as patients with stroke including a high Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score. Furthermore, these results suggest that PFO closure procedural results and long-term clinical outcomes are similar to their stroke counterparts, with a very low incidence of recurrent neurologic events. Further prospective randomized clinical trials are needed on this population.