No Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insight From the OCEAN-TAVI Registry

Recurrent strokes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in an elderly patient with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: a case report

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has evolved from a novel technology to an established therapy for high-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). Recently, its use has also been extended to low-risk patients, resulting in its increasing utilization in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). But as a serious post-TAVR complication, ischemic stroke was associated with a nearly 6-fold increased 30-day mortality. BAV presents unique challenges for post-TAVR antithrombotic therapy due to its distinct valvular anatomy.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of a 72-year-old female who presented with angina pectoris symptoms and was found to have severe BAV stenosis (Type 0). According to the patient's age, obvious symptom and willingness herself, TAVR was successful performed with deployment of a 23 mm Venus-A Plus valve (Venus Medtech, Hangzhou, China). A post-procedure echocardiogram confirmed the appropriate placement of the bioprosthetic valve with minor paravalvular regurgitation. Six months after TAVR, this patient experienced multiple strokes, presenting a significant challenge for clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

This case underscores the serious complications that can occur post-TAVR and highlights the need for improved strategies to prevent early strokes.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Japanese Patients With Large Annulus: The OCEAN-TAVI Registry

Background

East Asians have smaller aortic valve complexes than individuals from Western countries, and few studies have reported transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcomes in Asian patients with a large annulus.

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of TAVI using balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) and self-expandable valves (SEVs) in Asian patients with a large annulus.

Methods

The study retrospectively analyzed the data from the OCEAN-TAVI (Optimized Transcatheter Valvular Intervention Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) registry. A large annulus was defined by an annular area ≥500 mm2 and an average diameter ≥25 mm as measured by computed tomography. The primary endpoint was 3-year all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were 3-year heart failure rehospitalization (HFR) after TAVI, short-term outcomes of TAVI, and changes in valve function 2 years after TAVI.

Results

Among 773 patients, 671 underwent BEV TAVI. The SEV TAVI group showed a significantly higher incidence of greater than moderate paravalvular leakage (PVL) (P < 0.001), and an increased pacemaker implantation rate (P = 0.035). The incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch did not differ between the 2 groups. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed no significant differences in 3-year all-cause mortality and HFR rates (log-rank P = 0.900), and echocardiographic valve function at 2 years post-TAVI did not differ between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

The lack of differences in postoperative valve performance and long-term prognosis between BEV TAVI and SEV TAVI highlights the importance of selecting valves that can reduce the pacemaker implantation rate and PVL grade in the acute phase in patients with a large annulus. (Optimized Transcatheter Valvular Intervention Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation [OCEAN-TAVI]; UMIN000020423).

Successful Treatment of Malignant Lymphoma Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

A 67-year-old woman with severe aortic stenosis (AS) was transferred to our hospital for large B-cell lymphoma treatment. Because of her high risk of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity due to severe AS and low performance status, the patient was initially treated with doxorubicin-free chemotherapy. However, doxorubicin was considered necessary to achieve complete remission. After multidisciplinary team discussions, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was performed without complications. Nine days after TAVR, the patient received the first cycle of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (R-CHOP). Currently, 12 months after completing 4 cycles of R-CHOP, the patient remains in complete remission without having developed cardiotoxicity.

Antithrombotic therapy for transcatheter structural heart intervention

Percutaneous transcatheter structural heart interventions have considerably expanded within the last two decades, improving clinical outcomes and quality of life versus guideline-directed medical therapy for patients frequently ineligible for surgical treatment. Transcatheter structural heart interventions comprise valve implantation or repair and also occlusions of the patent foramen ovale, atrial septal defects and left atrial appendage. These procedures expose structural devices to arterial or venous blood flow with various rheological conditions leading to potential thrombotic complications and embolisation. Furthermore, these procedures may concern comorbid patients at high risk of both ischaemic and bleeding complications. This state-of-the-art review provides a description of the device-related thrombotic risk associated with these transcatheter structural heart interventions and of the current evidence-based guidelines regarding antithrombotic treatments. Gaps in evidence for each of the studied transcatheter interventions and the main ongoing trials are also summarised.

Size of Self-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve and Mid-Term Adverse Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

The hemodynamic performance of self-expandable valves (SEVs) is a preferable choice for small aortic annuli in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, no data are, so far, available regarding the relation between the size of SEVs and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of prosthesis size on adverse events after TAVR using SEVs. We retrospectively analyzed 1,400 patients (23-mm SEV: 13.6%) who underwent TAVR using SEVs at 12 centers. The impact of SEV size on all-cause death and heart failure (HF) after TAVR was evaluated by multivariate Cox regression and propensity score (PS) matching analysis. During the follow-up period (median 511 days), 201 all-cause deaths and 87 HF rehospitalizations were observed. The incidence of all-cause death was comparable between small- (23-mm SEV) and larger-sized (26- or 29-mm SEV) (16.8% vs 13.9%, log-rank p = 0.29). The size of SEV was not associated with a higher incidence of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 1.86 in Cox regression; HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.23 in PS matching) and HF after TAVR (subdistribution HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.72 in Cox regression; subdistribution HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.30 in PS matching). The multivariate model including postprocedural prosthesis-patient mismatch showed consistent results. In conclusion, small SEVs had comparable midterm clinical outcomes to larger-sized SEVs, even if the prosthesis-patient mismatch was observed after TAVR.

Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Thrombosis: Definitions, Clinical Impact, and Management: A State-of-the-Art Review

Bioprosthetic aortic valve thrombosis is frequently detected after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement due to advances in cardiac computed tomography angiography technology and standardized surveillance protocols in low-surgical-risk transcatheter aortic valve replacement trials. However, evidence is limited concerning whether subclinical leaflet thrombosis leads to clinical adverse events or premature structural valve deterioration. Furthermore, there may be net harm in the form of bleeding from aggressive antithrombotic treatment in patients with subclinical leaflet thrombosis. This review will discuss the incidence, mechanisms, diagnosis, and optimal management of bioprosthetic aortic valve thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) now represents the mainstay of treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Owing to its exceptional procedural efficacy and safety, TAVI has been extended to include patients at lower surgical risk, thus now encompassing a diverse patient population receiving this treatment. Yet, long-term outcomes also depend on optimal medical therapy for secondary vascular prevention, with antithrombotic therapy serving as the cornerstone. Leveraging data from multiple randomized controlled trials, the current guidelines generally recommend single antithrombotic therapy, with either single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or oral anticoagulation (OAC) alone in those patients without or with atrial fibrillation, respectively. Yet, individualization of this pattern, as well as specific case uses, may be needed based on individual patient characteristics and concurrent procedures. This review aims to discuss the evidence supporting antithrombotic treatments in patients treated with TAVI, indications for a standardized treatment, as well as specific considerations for an individualized approach to treatment.

Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a VARC-HBR consensus document

The identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are of major importance, but the lack of standardised definitions is challenging for trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Valve Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (VARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organisations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from Europe, the USA, and Asia, with a major focus on TAVI-related bleeding. VARC-HBR is an initiative of the CERC (Cardiovascular European Research Center), aiming to develop a consensus definition of TAVI patients at HBR, based on a systematic review of the available evidence, to provide consistency for future clinical trials, clinical decision-making, and regulatory review. This document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of HBR evaluating the safety and effectiveness of procedures, devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing TAVI..

What is the current optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation? Current evidence from Japan and the world

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a major valvular disease that can have a negative impact on patients' prognosis, and its prevalence is increasing due to an aging population worldwide. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-established therapy for symptomatic severe AS utilized across the entire surgical risk spectrum. Based on the recently published evidence of large, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the number of patients undergoing TAVI is increasing worldwide. Ischemic and bleeding events are common after TAVI and can have serious consequences both immediately after the procedure and in the long-term. Antiplatelet therapy has been traditionally recommended to prevent thromboembolic events after TAVI. The situation regarding the optimal antithrombotic regimen following TAVI is rapidly changing because many game-changing RCTs have been published. This report provides an overview of the current status and remaining issues in the field of optimal antithrombotic therapy following TAVI, including its possible effect on leaflet thrombosis.

Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes of Noncardiac Surgery After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Aortic stenosis is a prevalent valvular heart disease, especially in the older people. They often coexist with other co-morbidities, and noncardiac surgery carries a higher risk because of the underlying valve condition. Despite the growing concern about the safety and optimal management of noncardiac surgery post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), there is limited evidence on this matter. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of noncardiac surgeries after TAVR. This retrospective study included 718 patients who underwent TAVR. Of these, 36 patients underwent noncardiac surgery after TAVR. The primary end point was the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events post-TAVR and the secondary end point was the incidence of structural valve deterioration. Composite end points included disabling stroke, heart failure requiring hospitalization, and cardiac death as defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium 3. Most of these surgeries were orthopedic and classified as intermediate risk. All noncardiac surgeries were performed without perioperative adverse events. There was no observed structural valve deterioration, and the incidence of composite end points did not significantly differ between the surgical and nonsurgical groups during the follow-up period. Noncardiac surgery after TAVR can be performed safely and does not have a negative impact on prognosis. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal strategy for noncardiac surgery after TAVR.

Review of Bleeding and Thrombotic Risks Associated With Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Structural Heart Interventions

Transcatheter structural heart interventions have drastically evolved over the past 2 decades. However, most catheterization procedures require the deployment of devices in the body; therefore, the adhesion of thrombi to those devices is a major problem, resulting in the requirement of a period of postprocedural antithrombotic regimen. However, in recent years, bleeding associated with these antithrombotic therapies has also become a major concern, attracting the attention of investigators. This is complicated by the fact that patients at high thrombotic risk are also at high bleeding risk, making the issue of administrating antithrombotic therapy challenging. The objective of this review was to identify the important issues and summarize the current status of postoperative antithrombotic therapy and assessment of the bleeding risk following transcatheter structural heart interventions such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, and transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With or Without Active Cancer

Background Data on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in specific cancer types or the presence of metastatic disease remain sparse. This study aimed to investigate the impact of active cancer on short-term mortality, complications, and readmission rates after TAVR across different cancer types. Methods and Results The authors assessed the Nationwide Readmissions Database for TAVR cases from 2012 to 2019. Patients were stratified by specific cancer types. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included bleeding requiring blood transfusion and readmissions at 30, 90, and 180 days after TAVR. Overall, 122 573 patients undergoing TAVR were included in the analysis, of whom 8013 (6.5%) had active cancer. After adjusting for potential confounders, the presence of active cancer was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06 [95% CI, 0.89-1.27]; P=0.523). However, active cancer was associated with an increased risk of readmission at 30, 90, and 180 days after TAVR and increased risk of bleeding requiring transfusion at 30 days. Active colon and any type of metastatic cancer were individually associated with readmissions at 30, 90, and 180 days after TAVR. At 30 days after TAVR, colon (aOR, 2.51 [95% CI, 1.68-3.76]; P<0.001), prostate (aOR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.05-1.86]; P=0.021), and any type of metastatic cancer (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.23-2.22]; P=0.001) were individually associated with an increased risk of bleeding requiring transfusion. Conclusions Patients with active cancer had similar in-hospital mortality after TAVR but higher risk of readmission and bleeding requiring transfusion, the latter depending on certain types of cancer.

Rationale and design of Non-antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (NAPT) Trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the wide implementation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the optimal antithrombotic therapy after TAVI has not been established yet. Owing to the accumulating evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) over dual antiplatelet therapy, the latest guideline recommends life-long SAPT. However, there is scarce evidence supporting SAPT compared with non-antithrombotic therapy. Given the vulnerability of patients undergoing TAVI in terms of high bleeding risk, the benefit of SAPT may be canceled out by its potential increased bleeding risk.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES

Non-antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (NAPT) Trial is a prospective, randomized controlled, open-label blinded endpoint multicenter trial conducted in Japan, testing the non-inferiority of non-antithrombotic therapy compared with aspirin monotherapy in patients who underwent TAVI and had no indications for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Patients who successfully underwent trans-femoral TAVI for severe aortic stenosis with either balloon-expandable or self-expandable valves are eligible for inclusion. Key exclusion criteria are (i) occurrence of perioperative complications (ii) indications of taking antithrombotic drugs for other reasons; (iii) eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. A total of 360 patients will be randomized (1:1) to aspirin monotherapy vs. non-antithrombotic therapy. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding. All bleeding events based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 are included as a component of the primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

The NAPT trial will determine the non-inferiority of a non-antithrombotic therapy compared with aspirin monotherapy after TAVI.

Antithrombotic therapy following transcatheter aortic valve intervention

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly being performed to treat symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis and annual procedure volume has overtaken surgical aortic valve replacement in the United States. However, current international guidelines were written prior to the publication of several important recent studies. Furthermore, European and American guidelines differ in their recommendations of antithrombotic therapy following TAVR. Consequently, there is a need to examine the literature to provide clinicians guidance on the optimum antithrombotic strategy, particularly as different patient populations exist. In this review, we examine the data for antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy post-TAVR.

Medium-Term Outcomes of the Different Antithrombotic Regimens After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is associated with accelerated bioprosthesis degeneration and valve re-replacement. Whether 3-month warfarin use after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) protects against such consequences is unknown. We aimed to investigate if 3-month warfarin treatment after TAVI is associated with better outcomes than dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) at medium-term follow-up. Adults who underwent TAVI were identified retrospectively (n = 1,501) and classified into warfarin, DAPT, and SAPT groups based on antithrombotic regimen received. Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded. Outcomes and valve hemodynamics were compared between the groups. Annualized change from baseline in mean gradients and effective orifice area at last follow-up echocardiography was calculated. Overall, 844 patients were included (mean age: 80 ± 9 years, 43% women; 633 receiving warfarin, 164 DAPT, and 47 SAPT). Median time to follow-up was 2.5 (interquartile range 1.2 to 3.9) years. There were no differences in the adjusted outcome end points of ischemic stroke, death, valve re-replacement/intervention, structural valve degeneration, or their composite end point at follow-up. Annualized change in aortic valve area was significantly higher in DAPT (-0.11 [0.19] cm²/year) than warfarin (-0.06 [0.25] cm²/y, p = 0.03), but annualized change in mean gradients was not different (p >0.05). In conclusion, antithrombotic regimen, including warfarin, after TAVI was associated with marginally lower decrease in aortic valve area but no difference in medium-term clinical outcomes compared with DAPT and SAPT.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Cancer; Balancing between Ischemic and Bleeding Risk: A Narrative Review

Cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with cancer can be caused by concomitant CV risk factors, cancer itself, and anticancer therapy. Since malignancy can dysregulate the hemostatic system, predisposing cancer patients to both thrombosis and hemorrhage, the administration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to patients with cancer who suffer from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a clinical challenge to cardiologists. Apart from PCI and ACS, other structural interventions, such as TAVR, PFO-ASD closure, and LAA occlusion, and non-cardiac diseases, such as PAD and CVAs, may require DAPT. The aim of the present review is to review the current literature on the optimal antiplatelet therapy and duration of DAPT for oncologic patients, in order to reduce both the ischemic and bleeding risk in this high-risk population.

Contemporary issues and lifetime management in patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Latest clinical trials have indicated favorable outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, there are unanswered questions particularly in younger patients with longer life expectancy. While current evidence are limited to short duration of clinical follow-up, there are certain factors which may impair patients clinical outcomes and quality-of-life at long-term. Contemporary issues in the current TAVR era include prosthesis-patient mismatch, heart failure hospitalization, subclinical thrombosis, future coronary access, and valve durability. In this review, the authors review available evidence and discuss each remaining issues and theoretical treatment strategies in lifetime management of TAVR patients.