Patient Perspectives on Discharge from Specialist Type 2 Diabetes Care Back to Primary Care: A Qualitative Study

Effects of nurse tele support via telephone calls on transition between specialized and primary care in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a CONSORT-compliant randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The role of telemedicine in the transition to primary care for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is yet unknown. We aimed to evaluate this issue in well-controlled T2DM patients discharged from a tertiary clinic.

METHODS

This is a CONSORT-compliant 12-month randomized clinical trial (RCT). T2DM patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) < 8%, being discharged to primary care from a tertiary clinic, were recruited. The intervention group periodically received nurse phone calls focusing on education. The control group received primary care as usual. The main outcome was glycemic control (HbA1c) at 12 months.

RESULTS

147 patients were randomized (73 in intervention vs. 74 in control groups) with no differences in baseline data. After one year, we found no differences between groups in HbA1c (7.46% ± 1.37 in intervention vs. 7.54% ± 1.6 in control group; P = 0.76). HbA1c slightly increased from baseline in both groups (0.46% in intervention vs. 0.64% in control group) at 12 months, without differences between them (P = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

A telemedicine intervention based on phone calls plus primary care shows a similar effect to primary care alone on T2DM patients' HbA1c after tertiary clinic discharge. Patients remained with a reasonable HbA1c during the trial, suggesting that the transition to primary care was safe.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials, NCT02768480. Registered on April 29, 2016.

Experiences with hospital-to-home transitions: perspectives from patients, family members and healthcare professionals. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

PURPOSE

Multiple studies have explored the needs and experiences of patients, family members, and healthcare professionals regarding hospital-to-home transitions. Our study aimed to identify, critically appraise, and summarize these studies in a qualitative meta-synthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline, CINAHL and Embase were systematically searched to identify eligible articles from inception to June 2024. Qualitative studies were included and critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Insufficient-quality papers were excluded. We performed a meta-synthesis following (1) open coding by two independent researchers and (2) discussing codes during reflexivity meetings.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight studies were appraised, of which 53 were included. We reached thematic saturation, four themes were constructed: (1) care coordination and continuity, (2) communication, (3) patient and family involvement, and (4) individualized support and information exchange. For patients and families, tailored information and support are prerequisites for a seamless transition and an optimal recovery trajectory after hospital discharge. It is imperative that healthcare professionals communicate effectively within and across care settings to ensure multidisciplinary collaboration and care continuity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies essential elements of optimal transitional care. These findings could be supportive to researchers and healthcare professionals when (re)designing transitional care interventions to ensure care continuity after hospital discharge.

Provision of primary care by specialist physicians: a systematic review

Patients with stable chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension can be safely managed at the primary care level. Yet many such patients continue to follow-up with specialists at a higher expense with no added benefit. We introduce a new term to describe this phenomenon: scope inversion, defined as the provision of primary care by specialist physicians. We aimed to quantify the extent of scope inversion by conducting a systematic review. MEDLINE and five other databases were searched using the keywords 'specialist AND (routine OR primary) AND provi*' as well as other variations. The search was limited to human research without restrictions on language or date of publication. The inclusion criterion was studies on rates of the provision of routine primary care by specialist physicians. Thirteen observational studies met the inclusion criteria. A wide range of primary care involvement was observed among specialists, from 2.6% to 65% of clinic visits. Among children, 41.3% of visits with specialists were routine follow-ups for conditions such as allergic rhinitis and seborrhoeic dermatitis which could be managed in primary care. Data quality was moderate to low across the studies due to limitations of source data and varying definitions of primary care. Specialist physicians provide primary care to patients in a substantial proportion of clinic visits. Scope inversion is wasteful as it diverts patients to more expensive care without improving outcomes. A systems approach is needed to mitigate scope inversion and its harmful effects on healthcare service delivery.

Basal insulin initiation in primary vs. specialist care: similar glycaemic control in two different patient populations

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of healthcare provider (HCP) type (primary vs. specialist) on glycaemic control and other treatment parameters.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Study of Once-Daily Levemir (SOLVE(™) ) is an international, 24-week, observational study of insulin initiation in people with type 2 diabetes.

RESULTS

A total of 17,374 subjects were included, comprising 4144 (23.9%) primary care subjects. Glycaemic control improved in both HCP groups from baseline to final visit [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) -1.2 ± 1.4% (-13.1 ± 15.3 mmol/mol) and -1.3 ± 1.6% (-14.2 ± 17.5 mmol/mol), respectively]. After adjustment for known confounders, there was no statistically significant effect of HCP group on final HbA1c [-0.04%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 to -0.01 (-0.4 mmol/mol, 95% CI -1.0-0.1 mmol/mol), p = 0.1590]. However, insulin doses at the final visit were higher in primary care patients (+0.06, 95% CI 0.06-0.07 U/kg, p < 0.0001). Logistic regression demonstrated a significant effect of HCP type (primary vs. specialist care) on hypoglycaemia risk [odds ratio (OR) 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.87, p = 0.0002]. Primary care physicians took more time to train patients and had more frequent contact with patients than specialists (both p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care physicians and specialists achieved comparable improvements in glycaemic control following insulin initiation.

Short-term intensive insulin therapy at diagnosis in type 2 diabetes: plan for filling the gaps

Short-term intensive insulin therapy is unique amongst therapies for type 2 diabetes because it offers the potential to preserve and improve beta-cell function without additional pharmacological treatment. On the basis of clinical experience and the promising results of a series of studies in newly diagnosed patients, mostly in Asian populations, an expert workshop was convened to assess the available evidence and the potential application of short-term intensive insulin therapy should it be advocated for inclusion in clinical practice. Participants included primary care physicians and endocrinologists. We endorse the concept of short-term intensive insulin therapy as an option for some patients with type 2 diabetes at the time of diagnosis and have identified the following six areas where additional knowledge could help clarify optimal use in clinical practice: (1) generalizability to primary care, (2) target population and biomarkers, (3) follow-up treatment, (4) education of patients and providers, (5) relevance of ethnicity, and (6) health economics.