Evaluation of an online peer fundus photograph matching program in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy to medical students

The Decline of Basic Ophthalmology in General Medical Education: A Scoping Review and Recommended Potential Solutions

OBJECTIVE

This literature review aims to explore research and conceptual pieces on the state of ophthalmology education and suggest potential ways to address current challenges.

METHODS

A search was conducted in PubMed, ERIC, Web of Science, and Google Scholar with combinations of the following search terms: "ophthalmology education," "undergraduate medical education," "medical student," "United States," and "Canada." Eliminating irrelevant articles yielded 47 articles. Three were excluded because of region and focus, leaving 44. After examining the citations, we generated an additional 22 texts for review, totaling 66 articles.

RESULTS

Four primary themes were identified: (1) challenges to ophthalmological education in the U.S. and Canada, (2) potential remedies for optimizing ophthalmology curriculum, (3) technology in ophthalmology education, and (4) innovative ophthalmology teaching approaches. Major challenges included the lack of a standardized curriculum and inadequate clinical exposure and skills training. A number of remedies were proposed, such as standardizing curriculum and furthering faculty involvement, utilizing technology as time-effective learning aids, and employing innovative teaching approaches such as service learning.

CONCLUSION

In light of challenges in ophthalmology education, curriculum designers should consider Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) to assist students to remember meaningful exposures to ophthalmology knowledge and techniques. Based on CLT, we suggest two potential approaches to incorporating ophthalmology curriculum. The first is to embrace interdisciplinary collaborations and place ophthalmology knowledge in varied contexts to facilitate schema construction. The second is to incorporate ophthalmology diagnostics requirements into OSCEs and utilize simulation models for students to gradually increase the fidelity of tasks and devote cognitive resources fully to learning.

Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The goal of this systematic review was to examine self-directed learning (SDL) assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education.

METHODS

Seven electronic databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) to retrieve English-language articles published between 2015 and July of 2022, investigating assessment of SDL learning outcomes. Extracted data included the sample size, field of study, study design, SDL activity type, SDL assessment method, number of SDL assessments used, study quality, number of SDL components present utilising the framework the authors developed, and SDL activity outcomes. We also assessed relationships between SDL assessment method and number of SDL components, study quality, field of study, and study outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 141 studies included, the majority of study participants were medical (51.8%) or nursing (34.8%) students. The most common SDL assessment method used was internally-developed perception surveys (49.6%). When evaluating outcomes for SDL activities, most studies reported a positive or mixed/neutral outcome (58.2% and 34.8%, respectively). There was a statistically significant relationship between both number and type of assessments used, and study quality, with knowledge assessments (median-IQR 11.5) being associated with higher study quality (p < 0.001). Less than half (48.9%) of the studies used more than one assessment method to evaluate the effectiveness of SDL activities. Having more than one assessment (mean 9.49) was associated with higher quality study (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our systematic review suggest that SDL assessment practices within undergraduate health professions education vary greatly, as different aspects of SDL were leveraged and implemented by diverse groups of learners to meet different learning needs and professional accreditation requirements. Evidence-based best practices for the assessment of SDL across undergraduate healthcare professions education should include the use of multiple assessments, with direct and indirect measures, to more accurately assess student performance.

Medical Student Attitudes Toward the Use of Peer Physical Exam for Learning Fundoscopy

Background Peer physical examination learning is commonly practiced in medical schools during preclinical curricula and has been shown to improve empathy for patients. While there is literature regarding medical student attitudes toward peer physical exam learning, no studies to date have specifically examined student attitudes toward fundoscopy and dilation of the eyes for the purposes of learning fundoscopy. This study evaluates medical student preferences with regards to learning fundoscopy on peers and explores attitudes toward alternate approaches.

Methods First year medical students at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai participated in a 2-hour fundoscopy skills workshop in March 2020. Following the session, the authors administered a voluntary survey querying students on attitudes toward peer physical exam learning and its use in learning peer fundoscopy. Primary study endpoints evaluated (1) student attitudes toward the use of peer physical exam learning, (2) learning benefit of the session, including student comfort with conducting the fundoscopy exam, and (3) empathy toward patients experiencing dilation. Secondary endpoints focused on alternative teaching methods and preferences for nonmydriatic fundoscopy. Analysis of survey data was performed using nonparametric Spearman's correlations, chi-square tests, t-tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results A total of 51/138 (37%) students completed the survey, with 78% indicating they felt peer physical exam learning was a helpful instructional method, including for the fundoscopic exam. The session led to improved self-rated fundoscopy skills and empathy for patients. However, when considering learning with dilation versus alternative nonmydriatic techniques, 96% of students indicated a preference for using alternative nonmydriatic techniques.

Conclusion This study found that students' attitudes toward fundoscopy generally aligned with their overall peer physical exam preferences. However, they preferred not using dilation and learning with nonmydriatic fundoscopic techniques. Assessing student learning preferences and incorporating novel instructional tools can help facilitate more successful fundoscopy skills acquisition. These considerations are particularly important in the context of COVID-19 and with advances in teleophthalmology.

Smartphone Compatible versus Conventional Ophthalmoscope: A Randomized Crossover Educational Trial

Objective The aim of the study is to compare performance and ease-of-use (EOU) of optic disk assessment using a smartphone direct ophthalmoscope attachment (D-EYE) to the gold standard direct ophthalmoscope (DO).

Design The type of study involved is prospective, randomized, crossover, and educational trial.

Participants The participants involved were first year medical students inexperienced in ophthalmoscopy.

Methods Optic disks of standardized and volunteer patients were examined using the D-EYE and a conventional DO. Optic disk identification, EOU ratings of the devices, self-reported confidence level in their examination with the devices, and estimation of vertical cup-to-disk ratio (VCDR) were compared. Analyses included Chi-square tests, independent samples t-tests, correlations, and multivariable linear regression.

Results Forty-four medical students voluntarily participated in the study. Students using the DO required more attempts (3.57 vs. 2.69, p = 0.010) and time (197.00 vs. 168.02 seconds, p = 0.043) to match the patient's fundus to the correct photograph. Overall EOU between the devices (6.40 vs. 4.79, p < 0.001) and overall confidence in examination (5.65 vs. 4.49, p = 0.003) were greater when using the D-EYE. There were no statistically significant differences in accuracy of VCDR estimations between the two ophthalmoscopes.

Conclusion Smartphone ophthalmoscopy could offer additional learning opportunities in medical education and may be considered in clinical practice by non-specialist physicians given its greater EOU and increased success in visualizing the optic disk.

Non-simulator-based techniques in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy for medical students: a systematic review

Non-simulator-based examination methods of the fundal examination have shown to be cost-effective. We reviewed different non-simulator-based direct fundoscopy examination methods used in undergraduate curricula and their outcomes. PubMed (MEDLINE) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched using standard Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms ophthalmoscopy, medical education, undergraduate medical education, medical student, educational assessment and learning. The search included publications until 28^th February 2019. We obtained 34 articles after screening abstracts; of them, 12 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. The studies were comprised of diverse teaching methods which included fundal photograph matching with corresponding eye, continuous education using community-based eye clinics, formal instructions and demonstrations prior to skills training, ophthalmoscopy skills practice using eye pathologies, teaching versus conventional ophthalmoscopy and group-based teaching. We concluded that non-simulator-based techniques such as use of fundal photograph matching of an eye of a volunteer, introduction to eye pathologies, smaller student groups and formal instructions with video demonstrations prior to skills training were highly effective in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy for undergraduate medical students.

Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education

BACKGROUND

Direct ophthalmoscopy (DO) is an essential skill for medical graduates but there are multiple barriers to learning this. Medical students and junior doctors typically lack confidence in DO. Most students do not own an ophthalmoscope and learn via ward devices that vary in design and usability. The Arclight ophthalmoscope (AO) is an easy to use, low-cost and portable device that could help address device access. This study aimed to assess the impact of personal ownership of an AO on DO skill acquisition and competency amongst medical students in the clinical environment.

METHODS

Method comparison study with 42 medical students randomised to either traditional device ophthalmoscope (TDO) control or AO intervention group during an 18-week medical placement. Three objective assessments of DO competency were performed at the beginning and end of the placement: vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) measurement, fundus photo multiple-choice questions (F-MCQ) and model slide examination (MSE). DO examinations performed during the placement were recorded via an electronic logbook.

RESULTS

Students in both groups recorded a median number of six examinations each during an eighteen-week placement. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in any of the objective assessment measures (VCDR p = 0.561, MCQ p = 0.872, Model p = 0.772). Both groups demonstrated a minor improvement in VCDR measurement but a negative performance change in F-MCQ and MSE assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Students do not practice ophthalmoscopy often, even with constant access to their own portable device. The lack of significant difference between the groups suggests that device access alone is not the major factor affecting frequency of DO performance and consequent skill acquisition. Improving student engagement with ophthalmoscopy will require a more wide-ranging approach.

Comparison of smartphone ophthalmoscopy vs conventional direct ophthalmoscopy as a teaching tool for medical students: the COSMOS study

Purpose

To investigate the utility of smartphone ophthalmology for medical students for learning fundoscopy compared with direct ophthalmoscopy.

Methods

After 1 hour of didactic instruction on ophthalmoscopy, second-year medical students in a small group setting were randomized to start training with the direct ophthalmoscope vs smartphone ophthalmoscope and crossed over to the other instrument through the session.

Main outcome measures

Ability to visualize the optic nerve and retinal blood vessels in an undilated pupil as well as a survey evaluating ease of use, confidence, and ability to visualize the optic nerve with the two instruments.

Results

One hundred and one medical students participated. Significantly more medical students were able to visualize the optic nerve with the smartphone ophthalmoscope vs the direct ophthalmoscope in an undilated pupil (82.3% vs 48.5%, P<0.0001). Students reported a more positive experience with the smartphone ophthalmoscope, specifically regarding ease of use (median of 4 vs 3; P<0.0001), their confidence in performing ophthalmoscopy (median of 4 vs 3; P<0.0001), and their ability to visualize features of the optic nerve (median 4 vs 3; P<0.0001). A significant number of participants preferred the smartphone ophthalmoscope over the traditional direct ophthalmoscope for learning how to identify the optic disc and for evaluating patients (78.2% and 77.2%, respectively; P<0.0001).

Conclusion

Smartphone ophthalmoscopy may serve as a useful adjunctive tool to teach direct ophthalmoscopy as well as being an alternative for examining the fundus for noneye care physicians.

The scratch collapse test: A systematic review

The diagnosis of nerve compression relies on collecting diagnostic clues from the history, physical examination, imaging and diagnostic testing. There are several provocative tests to aid in the diagnosis of nerve compression. The 'Scratch Collapse Test' (SCT) has emerged as a new provocative test to assist in the localisation of peripheral nerve compression. This study aims to perform a systematic review of literature to assess the data on the reliability of the SCT as a diagnostic test for entrapment neuropathy. Ten articles were reviewed. Five articles had sufficient numerical data for analysis, and in these five articles, the positive predictive values and specificity were high, i.e. between 0.71 and 0.99 and 0.6 and 0.99, respectively, whereas other values were very variable, i.e. individual negative predictive values ranged from 0.15 to 0.92 and the sensitivity values ranged from 0.24 to 0.77. Another main finding was the versatility of the test in that it can be used for various nerve entrapments and to localise the exact level of compression. Literature suggests that SCT has potential to be used as a clinical diagnostic tool for entrapment neuropathy. However, wide variations in early literature suggest that SCT should not be used as a sole diagnostic tool but as an adjunct to a surgeon's diagnostic repertoire.