The effect of stimulating versus nonstimulating catheters for continuous interscalene plexus blocks in short-term pain management

Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block versus parenteral analgesia for postoperative pain relief after major shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain may lead to adverse effects on the body, which might result in an increase in morbidity. Its management therefore poses a unique challenge for the clinician. Major shoulder surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain, and different modalities are available to manage such pain, including opioid and non-opioid analgesics, local anaesthetics infiltrated into and around the shoulder joint and regional anaesthesia. All of these techniques, alone or in combination, have been used to treat the postoperative pain of major shoulder surgery but with varying success.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to compare the analgesic efficacy of continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) with parenteral opioid analgesia for pain relief after major shoulder surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2012, Issue 12), MEDLINE (1950 to December 2012), EMBASE (1980 to December 2012), Web of Science (1954 to December 2012), CINAHL (1982 to December 2012) and bibliographies of published studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of continuous ISBPB compared with different forms of parenteral opioid analgesia in relieving pain in adult participants undergoing elective major shoulder surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted outcome data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two randomized controlled trials (147 participants). A total of 17 participants were excluded from one trial because of complications related to continuous ISBPB (16) or parenteral opioid analgesia (one). Thus we have information on 130 participants (66 in the continuous ISBPB group and 64 in the parenteral opioid group). The studies were clinically heterogeneous. No meta-analysis was undertaken. However, results of the two included studies showed better pain relief with continuous ISBPB following major shoulder surgery and a lower incidence of complications when interscalene block is performed under ultrasound guidance rather than without it.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Because of the small number of studies (two) relevant to the subject and the high risk of bias of the selected studies, no reasonable conclusion can be drawn.

Assessing health status in inflammatory bowel disease using a novel single-item numeric rating scale

BACKGROUND

Current instruments used to measure disease activity and health-related quality of life in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are often cumbersome, time-consuming, and expensive; although used in clinical trials, they are not convenient for clinical practice. A numeric rating scale (NRS) is a quick, inexpensive, and convenient patient-reported outcome that can capture the patient's overall perception of health.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of an NRS and evaluate its use in clinical practice in patients with CD and UC.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated patient-reported NRS scores and measured correlations between NRS and a range of severity measures, including physician-reported NRS, Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI), Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI), inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with CD. Subsequently, we evaluated the correlation between the NRS and standard measures of health status (HBI or simple colitis clinical activity index [SCCAI]) and laboratory tests (sedimentation rate [ESR], CRP, and fecal calprotectin) in patients with CD and UC.

RESULTS

The patient-reported NRS showed excellent correlation with CDAI (R (2) = 0.59, p < 0.0001), IBDQ (R (2) = 0.66, p < 0.0001), and HBI (R (2) = 0.32, p < 0.0001) in patients with CD. The NRS showed poor, but statistically significant correlation with SCCAI (R (2) = 0.25, p < 0.0001) in patients with UC. The NRS did not correlate with CRP, ESR, or calprotectin. The NRS was reliable and responsive to change.

CONCLUSIONS

The NRS is a valid, reliable, and responsive measure that may be useful to evaluate patients with CD and possibly UC.

The effect of stimulating versus nonstimulating catheter techniques for continuous regional anesthesia: a semiquantitative systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Stimulating catheters provide feedback regarding the location of the catheter tip in relation to the target nerve or plexus. There is debate concerning whether stimulating catheters may reduce the failure rate of postoperative analgesia or whether they may enhance functional recovery by providing superior and more reliable postoperative analgesia.

METHODS

Studies comparing the effect of stimulating versus nonstimulating catheters for postoperative analgesia were systematically and independently searched by 2 authors.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized controlled studies could be included in this review. One trial was performed in volunteers; the others were clinical trials in patients. Five trials were performed in patients scheduled for a femoral nerve catheter, 4 for a distal sciatic nerve catheter, 1 in patients receiving an interscalene nerve catheter, and 1 in patients with an infraclavicular brachial plexus block. A standard quantitative analysis was deemed inappropriate because of considerable heterogeneity regarding the investigated outcome parameters. A semiquantitative review revealed that efficacy (judged by reduction in the need for rescue analgesics, complete surgery block, or median effective local anesthetic volume blocking the nerve) suggests improvement in stimulating catheters compared with nonstimulating catheters. Patient satisfaction as well as functional recovery was poorly investigated, so no conclusions could be drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

Published reports of randomized controlled trials provide evidence for a better analgesic effect from stimulating catheters. Future trials should be conducted in a standardized manner with uniform reporting of outcomes, which may facilitate future quantitative analysis.

Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008

Brachial plexus blockade is the cornerstone of the peripheral nerve regional anesthesia practice of most anesthesiologists. As part of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine's commitment to providing intensive evidence-based education related to regional anesthesia and analgesia, this article is a complete update of our 2002 comprehensive review of upper extremity anesthesia. The text of the review focuses on (1) pertinent anatomy, (2) approaches to the brachial plexus and techniques that optimize block quality, (4) local anesthetic and adjuvant pharmacology, (5) complications, (6) perioperative issues, and (6) challenges for future research.

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks in clinical practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review highlights new insights into indications and guidance during procedures for continuous peripheral nerve blocks.

RECENT FINDINGS

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks consistently provide better analgesia than traditional systemic opioid-based analgesia. The literature shows that continuous peripheral nerve blocks prolong site-specific local anesthetic delivery in the outpatient setting, allow optimal analgesia, have minimal side effects, and avoid premature regression of an analgesic block. Furthermore, an improvement in patients' health-related quality of life or outcome benefits has been demonstrated. It appears that continuous peripheral nerve blocks are generally superior to intraarticular local anesthetic infusion for immediate postoperative pain, but new data demonstrate that, apart from a multimodal analgesia regimen, periarticular and intraarticular application of local anesthetics can improve early postoperative analgesia and mobilization. Finally, it seems that, only for interscalene and popliteal sciatic nerve blocks, the use of stimulating catheters slightly decreases visual analog scale scores for postoperative pain and intravenous opioid rescue analgesia. Ultrasound guidance offers the potential advantage to confirm catheter tip location.

SUMMARY

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks are essential in the perioperative anesthetic management of in-hospital or ambulatory patients. Ultrasound guidance and stimulating catheters can help anesthetists during the procedure.