Effects of high intraoperative inspired oxygen on postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery

Promethazine for nausea and vomiting prevention after gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) represent significant concerns for patients undergoing surgical procedures, as these symptoms greatly impact their postoperative experience. Among female patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, the incidence of PONV is estimated to be approximately 45%. Moreover, for those individuals who have not undergone preventive treatment, the risk of experiencing PONV can be as high as 80%.Regrettably, despite ongoing efforts, there is still a lack of a fully effective and comprehensive solution to effectively manage and prevent PONV in these patient populations. The pursuit of an ideal strategy for the prevention and management of PONV remains an active area of research and clinical investigation. This prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind study was conducted at Gansu Provincial Hospital from June 2021 to March 2022, involving a cohort of 100 subjects aged 18-65 years undergoing non-emergent gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Prior to anesthesia induction, subjects were intravenously administered either 6.25 mg of promethazine or 1 mL of saline. Postoperatively, all subjects received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia and a continuous infusion of metoclopramide at a rate of 50 mg. The primary outcome measures included assessing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting at 72 h following the surgical procedure. The results of this study show that the overall incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 72 h after operation is significantly different between the two groups before. (P = 0.026, P = 0.012). The incidence and severity of nausea during the early period (the first 6 h postoperatively) was significantly different between groups (P = 0.043, 95%CI(-0.273,-0.019), P = 0.048). A statistically significant difference was found in the incidence and severity within 24 h postoperatively (P = 0.026,95%CI (-0.348,-0.042), P = 0.003). Vomiting incidence and severity were lower than in the control group at the 6 h postoperatively but without statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.166, 95%CI(-0.164,0.016) P = 0.180). Vomiting incidence and severity were statistically different during the 24 h postoperatively (P = 0.011, 95%CI(-0.342,-0.048),P = 0.004). A significant statistical difference was found in the satisfaction between the two groups during the postoperative observation period (P = 0.002). The administration of preoperative prophylactic promethazine proved to be notably effective in diminishing both the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting within the initial 72 h postoperatively. This intervention demonstrated a favorable safety profile, characterized by a minimal occurrence of adverse effects and an absence of serious adverse reactions. Furthermore, the satisfaction levels of patients undergoing this prophylactic approach were observed to be improved. These findings highlight the potential benefits of preoperative prophylactic promethazine in enhancing the postoperative experience for patients, with positive implications for their overall satisfaction with the surgical procedure. Clinical Trials Registration Number: (18/12/2021) ChiCTR2100054495.

Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Subanalysis of a Trial, Systematic Review, and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative supplemental oxygen may reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting by mitigating hypoxic stress on the gastrointestinal tract. The authors therefore tested the hypothesis that supplemental oxygen reduces nausea and vomiting in adults recovering from colorectal surgery at the Cleveland Clinic between January 28, 2013, and March 11, 2016.

METHODS

Initially, the authors conducted an unplanned subanalysis of a previous trial that evaluated the effect of 80% versus 30% intraoperative inspired oxygen on surgical site infection. Specifically, they assessed the effect of 80% versus 30% oxygen concentration on the incidence of postoperative nausea and/or vomiting. Thereafter, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of supplemental oxygen on postoperative nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

The authors' underlying analysis included 5,057 colorectal surgeries on 4,001 patients. For 2,554 surgeries, assignment was to 80% oxygen, and in 2,503 surgeries, to 30%. Postoperative nausea and vomiting was 852 of 2,554 (33%) in 80% oxygen and 814 of 2,503 (33%) in 30% oxygen. The estimated relative risk (95% CI) of 80% versus 30% oxygen on postoperative nausea and vomiting was 1.04 (0.96 to 1.12) in a generalized estimating equation model adjusting for within-patient correlation for patients with multiple surgeries, P = 0.355. Furthermore, supplemental oxygen did not reduce antiemetic use (P = 0.911) or the severity of nausea and vomiting (P = 0.924). The authors' meta-analysis included 10 qualifying trials (6,749 patients) and did not find a difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting: relative risk, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.08], P = 0.55, I2 = 52%.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting did not differ in patients assigned to 80% or 30% inspired oxygen. A meta-analysis of available trials similarly indicated that supplemental intraoperative oxygen does not reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting. Therefore, supplemental oxygen should not be given in the expectation that it will reduce nausea and vomiting.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Intraoperative Respiratory and Hemodynamic Strategies for Reducing Nausea, Vomiting, and Pain after Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite improved medical treatment strategies, post-operative pain, nausea, and vomiting remain major challenges. This systematic review investigated the relationship between perioperative respiratory and hemodynamic interventions and postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched on March 8, 2021 for randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of perioperative respiratory or hemodynamic interventions in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Investigators reviewed trials for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed when feasible. GRADE was used to assess the certainty in the evidence.

RESULTS

This review included 65 original trials; of these 48% had pain, nausea and/or vomiting as the primary focus. No reduction of postoperative pain was found in meta-analyses when comparing recruitment maneuvers with no recruitment, high (80%) to low (30%) fraction of oxygen, low (5-7 ml/kg) to high (9-12 ml/kg) tidal volume, or goal-directed hemodynamic therapy to standard care. In the meta-analysis comparing recruitment maneuvers with no recruitment maneuvers, patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery had less shoulder pain 24 hours postoperatively (mean difference in the numeric rating scale from 0 to 10: -1.1, 95% CI: -1.7, -0.5). In meta-analyses, comparing high to low fraction of inspired oxygen and goal-directed hemodynamic therapy to standard care in patients undergoing abdominal surgery, the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting was reduced (odds ratio: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.87 and 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.85). The certainty in the evidence was mostly very low to low. The results should be considered exploratory given the lack of pre-specified hypotheses and corresponding risk of Type 1 errors.

CONCLUSION

There is limited evidence regarding the impact of intraoperative respiratory and hemodynamic interventions on postoperative pain or nausea and vomiting. More definitive trials are needed to guide clinical care within this area. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Effects of intraoperative high versus low inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) on patient's outcome: A systematic review of evidence from the last 20 years

Despite numerous studies, controversies about the best intraoperative FiO2 remain. In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia should be ventilated intraoperatively with an 80% FiO2 to reduce surgical site infection (SSI). However, several data suggest that hyperoxia could have adverse effects. In order to determine the potential effect of FiO2 on SSI, we included in this systematic review 23 studies (among which 21 randomised controlled trials [RCT]) published between 1999 and 2020, comparing intraoperative high versus low FiO2. Results were heterogeneous but most recent studies on one hand, and the largest RCTs on the other hand, reported no difference on the incidence of SSI regarding intraoperative FiO2 during general anaesthesia. There was also no difference in the incidence of SSI depending of intraoperative FiO2 in patients receiving regional anaesthesia. The review on secondary endpoints (respiratory and cardiovascular adverse events, postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative length-of-stay and mortality) also failed to support the use of high FiO2. On the opposite, some data from follow-up analyses and registry studies suggested a possible negative effect of high intraoperative FiO2 on long-term outcomes. In conclusion, the systematic administration of a high intraoperative FiO2 in order to decrease SSI or improve other perioperative outcomes seems unjustified in the light of the evidence currently available in the literature.

The effects of high perioperative inspiratory oxygen fraction for adult surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Available evidence on the effects of a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) of 60% to 90% compared with a routine fraction of inspired oxygen of 30% to 40%, during anaesthesia and surgery, on mortality and surgical site infection has been inconclusive. Previous trials and meta-analyses have led to different conclusions on whether a high fraction of supplemental inspired oxygen during anaesthesia may decrease or increase mortality and surgical site infections in surgical patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of an FIO2 equal to or greater than 60% compared with a control FIO2 at or below 40% in the perioperative setting in terms of mortality, surgical site infection, respiratory insufficiency, serious adverse events and length of stay during the index admission for adult surgical patients.We looked at various outcomes, conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses, examined the role of bias and applied trial sequential analysis (TSA) to examine the level of evidence supporting or refuting a high FIO2 during surgery, anaesthesia and recovery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, International Web of Science, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information Database (LILACS), advanced Google and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) up to February 2014. We checked the references of included trials and reviews for unidentified relevant trials and reran the searches in March 2015. We will consider two studies of interest when we update the review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized clinical trials that compared a high fraction of inspired oxygen with a routine fraction of inspired oxygen during anaesthesia, surgery and recovery in individuals 18 years of age or older.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data independently. We conducted random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses, and for dichotomous outcomes, we calculated risk ratios (RRs). We used published data and data obtained by contacting trial authors.To minimize the risk of systematic error, we assessed the risk of bias of the included trials. To reduce the risk of random errors caused by sparse data and repetitive updating of cumulative meta-analyses, we applied trial sequential analyses. We used Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to assess the quality of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 28 randomized clinical trials (9330 participants); in the 21 trials reporting relevant outcomes for this review, 7597 participants were randomly assigned to a high fraction of inspired oxygen versus a routine fraction of inspired oxygen.In trials with an overall low risk of bias, a high fraction of inspired oxygen compared with a routine fraction of inspired oxygen was not associated with all-cause mortality (random-effects model: RR 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.36; GRADE: low quality) within the longest follow-up and within 30 days of follow-up (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.99, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.60; GRADE: low quality). In a trial sequential analysis, the required information size was not reached and the analysis could not refute a 20% increase in mortality. Similarly, when all trials were included, a high fraction of inspired oxygen was not associated with all-cause mortality to the longest follow-up (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.33) or within 30 days of follow-up (Peto OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.29), both of very low quality according to GRADE. Neither was a high fraction of inspired oxygen associated with the risk of surgical site infection in trials with low risk of bias (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.17; GRADE: low quality) or in all trials (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.07; GRADE: low quality). A high fraction of inspired oxygen was not associated with respiratory insufficiency (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.99), serious adverse events (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.43) or length of stay (mean difference -0.06 days, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.32 days).In subgroup analyses of nine trials using preoperative antibiotics, a high fraction of inspired oxygen was associated with a decrease in surgical site infections (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.97; GRADE: very low quality); a similar effect was noted in the five trials adequately blinded for the outcome assessment (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.96; GRADE: very low quality). We did not observe an effect of a high fraction of inspired oxygen on surgical site infections in any other subgroup analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

As the risk of adverse events, including mortality, may be increased by a fraction of inspired oxygen of 60% or higher, and as robust evidence is lacking for a beneficial effect of a fraction of inspired oxygen of 60% or higher on surgical site infection, our overall results suggest that evidence is insufficient to support the routine use of a high fraction of inspired oxygen during anaesthesia and surgery. Given the risk of attrition and outcome reporting bias, as well as other weaknesses in the available evidence, further randomized clinical trials with low risk of bias in all bias domains, including a large sample size and long-term follow-up, are warranted.

Effect of intraoperative high inspired oxygen fraction on surgical site infection, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pulmonary function: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative high inspired oxygen fraction (FIO2) is thought to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) and postoperative nausea and vomiting, and to promote postoperative atelectasis.

METHODS

The authors searched for randomized trials (till September 2012) comparing intraoperative high with normal FIO2 in adults undergoing surgery with general anesthesia and reporting on SSI, nausea or vomiting, or pulmonary outcomes.

RESULTS

The authors included 22 trials (7,001 patients) published in 26 reports. High FIO2 ranged from 80 to 100% (median, 80%); normal FIO2 ranged from 30 to 40% (median, 30%). In nine trials (5,103 patients, most received prophylactic antibiotics), the incidence of SSI decreased from 14.1% with normal FIO2 to 11.4% with high FIO2; risk ratio, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59-1.00). After colorectal surgery, the incidence of SSI decreased from 19.3 to 15.2%; risk ratio, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.60-1.02). In 11 trials (2,293 patients), the incidence of nausea decreased from 24.8% with normal FIO2 to 19.5% with high FIO2; risk ratio, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66-0.93). In patients receiving inhalational anesthetics without prophylactic antiemetics, high FIO2 provided a significant protective effect against both nausea and vomiting. Nine trials (3,698 patients) reported on pulmonary outcomes. The risk of atelectasis was not increased with high FIO2.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative high FIO2 further decreases the risk of SSI in surgical patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics, has a weak beneficial effect on nausea, and does not increase the risk of postoperative atelectasis.

Rational use of oxygen in medical disease and anesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Supplemental oxygen is often administered during anesthesia and in critical illness to treat hypoxia, but high oxygen concentrations are also given for a number of other reasons such as prevention of surgical site infection (SSI). The decision to use supplemental oxygen is, however, controversial, because of large heterogeneity in the reported results and emerging reports of side-effects. The aim of this article is to review the recent findings regarding benefits and harms of oxygen therapy in anesthesia and acute medical conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Large randomized trials have not found significant reductions in SSI with 80% oxygen during and after abdominal surgery and cesarean section. There is no documented benefit of hyperbaric oxygen treatment for acute ischemic stroke, and there is emerging data to suggest increased mortality with normobaric supplemental oxygen for myocardial infarction without heart failure. Survival and neurologic outcome seem to be adversely affected by hyperoxia in patients with return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest.

SUMMARY

The benefits of supplemental oxygen are not yet confirmed, and new findings suggest that potential side-effects should be considered if the inspired oxygen concentration is increased above what is needed to maintain normal arterial oxygen saturation.