Can we reduce anesthesia exposure? Neonatal brain MRI: Swaddling vs. sedation, a national survey

Effect of Anesthesia During Pregnancy, Delivery, and Childhood on Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

To investigate the association between exposure to anesthesia during three periods of pregnancy, delivery, and childhood and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, PsycArticles, and PsycINFO were searched from the date of database inception to 1 December 2022. Studies reported the association between exposure to anesthesia during pregnancy, delivery, and childhood and ASD were included. Extracted variables included hazard ratio (HR), relative risk or odds ratio, standard error, and 95% confidence interval (CI). Effect estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. In total, 16 studies including 8,156,608 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. Labor epidural anesthesia during delivery was associated with ASD in the general population (adjusted HR = 1.16, 95% CI, 1.06-1.28) but not in the sibling population (adjusted HR = 1.06, 95% CI, 0.98-1.15). Other anesthesia during delivery was not associated with ASD (general population: adjusted HR = 1.08, 95% CI, 0.99-1.17; sibling population: adjusted HR = 1.20, 95% CI, 0.81-1.79). Three studies suggested that exposure to anesthesia during pregnancy was associated with ASD in offspring (adjusted HR = 2.15, 95% CI, 1.32-3.48). There was no significant association between exposure to general anesthesia during childhood and ASD (adjusted HR = 1.02, 95% CI, 0.60-1.72). This meta-analysis did not confirm the association between exposure to anesthesia during labour and ASD. Previous observational studies used the neurotoxicity of anesthesia to biologically explain significant associations, but in fact different controls for confounding factors led to differences in associations. The evidence for pregnancy and childhood was limited given the small number of studies in these periods.

Sedation and anesthesia for imaging of the infant and neonate-a brief review

Sedation and anesthesia are often required in order to facilitate collection of high-quality imaging studies free of significant motion artifact for infants and neonates. Provision of safe sedation and anesthesia requires good communication between the ordering provider, radiologist, and anesthesiologist, careful pre-procedural evaluation of the patient, and availability of appropriate and sufficient equipment, drugs, personnel, and facilities. There are many additional factors to be considered for provision of safe sedation or anesthesia for infants and neonates-it is ideal to involve a fellowship-trained pediatric anesthesiologist in the planning and carry-out of these plans. In this review, we discuss some of the basic definitions of sedation and anesthesia, requirements for safe sedation and anesthesia, and many of the germane risks and additional considerations that factor into the delivery of a safe sedation or anesthesia plan for the imaging of an infant or neonate.

Adequacy of an In-Neonatal Intensive Care Unit 1T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Management

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aims to assess the added diagnostic utility and clinical value of a 3-Tesla neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging after obtaining a 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging within the neonatal intensive care unit.

METHODS

A cohort of 34 infants had an initial 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and repeat imaging within 14 days in a 3-Tesla scanner. All infants were admitted to the level III neonatal intensive care unit at Brigham and Women's Hospital, and all images were interpreted by pediatric neuroradiologists.

RESULTS

For 31 infants (91%), the 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging showed similar or expected evolution of known findings found on 1 Tesla. For infants with change between the 1-Tesla and 3-Tesla imaging results, there was no clinical impact.

CONCLUSION

Images from 1-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging were sufficient for characterizing a wide range of neonatal brain injuries and abnormalities and repeated 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging did not yield further clinical benefit.

Four-year review of safe and effective procedural sedation in neonates and young infants

Objectives

Newborns and small infants are unable to cooperate actively during diagnostic procedures; therefore, sedation is often employee to maintain immobilization and obtain high-quality images. However, these procedures are often indicated in sick, vulnerable, or hemodynamically unstable neonates and young infants, which raises the associated risks of sedation. This study summarizes our 4-year of experience with safe and effective procedural sedation in this vulnerable population.

Study design

This retrospective study analyzed data on neonates and young infants who underwent non-painful diagnostic procedures from December 2019 to November 2023. Patients were categorized into the neonate (aged≦ 28 days) and the young infant (29 days ≦ aged ≦ 90 days) groups.

Results

Non-pharmacological strategies, including sleeping naturally, swaddling/facilitated tucking, non-nutritive sucking, and skin-to-skin care, can achieve a success rate for sedation about 98.4%. In terms of pharmacological methods, our institution primarily utilizes chloral hydrate for procedural sedation in neonates and young infants undergoing non-painful diagnostic procedures. Midazolam serves as an alternative sedative. Chloral hydrate alone demonstrated a 92.5% success rate on the first attempt, compared to midazolam alone, with an 85.11% success rate. Neonates experienced a higher incidence of adverse events during sedation compared to young infants.

Conclusion

This study reviews our 4-year experience with procedural sedation in neonates and young infants. Chloral hydrate demonstrated a high degree of safety and efficacy in this population. However, supervision by skilled medical personnel and extended observation is required. In our institution, the experience with midazolam is limited in this population, and further research is warranted to establish its safety and efficacy. Non-pharmacological strategies can achieve an acceptable rate of sedation success, which can be used based on patient's tolerance.

A survey of non-sedate practices when acquiring pediatric magnetic resonance imaging examinations

BACKGROUND

Improving access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in childhood can be facilitated by making it faster and cheaper and reducing need for sedation or general anesthesia (GA) to mitigate motion. Some children achieve diagnostic quality MRI without GA through the use of non- practices fostering their cooperation and/or alleviating anxiety. Employed before and during MRI, these variably educate, distract, and/or desensitize patients to this environment.

OBJECTIVE

To assess current utilization of non-sedate practices in pediatric MRI, including variations in practice and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey-based study was conducted with 1372 surveys emailed to the Society for Pediatric Radiology members in February 2021, inviting one response per institution.

RESULTS

Responses from 50 unique institutions in nine countries revealed 49/50 (98%) sites used ≥ 1 non-sedate practice, 48/50 (96%) sites in infants < 6 months, and 11/50 (22%) for children aged 6 months to 3 years. Non-sedate practices per site averaged 4.5 (range 0-10), feed and swaddle used at 47/49 (96%) sites, and child life specialists at 35/49 (71%). Average success rates were moderate (> 50-75%) across all sites and high (> 75-100%) for 20% of sites, varying with specific techniques. Commonest barriers to use were scheduling conflicts and limited knowledge.

CONCLUSION

Non-sedate practice utilization in pediatric MRI was near-universal but widely variable across sites, ages, and locales, with room for broader adoption. Although on average non-sedate practice success rates were similar, the range in use and outcomes suggest a need for standardized implementation guidelines, including patient selection and outcome metrics, to optimize utilization and inform educational initiatives.

Factors and Labor Cost Savings Associated with Successful Pediatric Imaging without Anesthesia: a Single-Institution Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

In pediatric imaging, sedation is often necessary to obtain diagnostic quality imaging. We aim to quantify patient and imaging-specific factors associated with successful pediatric scans without anesthesia and to evaluate labor cost savings associated with our institutional Scan Without Anesthesia Program (SWAP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who participated in SWAP between 2019-2022 were identified. Chart review was conducted to obtain sociodemographic and clinical information. Radiology database was used to obtain scan duration, modality/body part of examination, and administration of contrast. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-Square tests were used for univariate analysis of factors associated with success. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate independent contributions to success. Associated hospital labor cost savings were estimated using salary information obtained through publicly available resources.

RESULTS

Of 731 patients, 698 had successful and 33 had unsuccessful scans (95% success rate). In univariate analysis, older age, female sex, absence of developmental delay, and administration of contrast were significantly associated with successful scans. Multivariate analyses revealed that older age, female sex, and absence of developmental delay were significant independent factors lending toward success. Imaging-related factors were not associated with outcome in multivariate analysis. Estimated labor cost savings were $139,367.80 per year for the medical center.

CONCLUSION

SWAP had an overall success rate of 95%. Older age, absence of developmental delay, and female sex were independently significantly associated with successful outcome. Cost analysis reveals substantial labor cost savings to the institution compared with imaging under anesthesia.

[Anaesthesia and Sedation for Diagnostic Procedures in Children]

Constant medical progress leads to an increasing range of indications and consequently increasing number of diagnostic procedures in (early) childhood. To prevent lasting traumatization of children (and parents) and to ensure proper examination conditions, adequate (analgo-)sedation or general anesthesia is usually required for the appropriate management of diagnostic procedures in childhood, whether painful or not. The safety of young patients is the first priority. Administrations, hospitals, and each individual anesthesiologist are responsible for establishing structures, experience, and knowledge in this area so that children of all ages receive optimum care. In this article, the authors provide an overview of basic principles (structures, requirements, recommendations), currently used drugs, and procedure-specific examples for providing procedural analgosedation/anesthesia in children.

Variation in NICU Head CT Utilization Among U.S. Children's Hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate nationwide 12-year trend and hospital-level variation in head computed tomography (CT) utilization among infants admitted to pediatric hospital NICUs. We hypothesized there was significant variation in utilization.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining head CT utilization for infants admitted to the NICU within 31 United States children's hospitals within the Pediatric Health Information System database between 2010 and 2021. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to estimate head CT, head MRI, and head ultrasound utilization (% of admissions) by year. Risk-adjusted hospital head CT rates were examined within the 2021 cohort.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2021, there were 338 644 NICU admissions, of which 10 052 included head CT (3.0%). Overall, head CT utilization decreased (4.9% in 2010 to 2.6% in 2021, P < .0001), with a concomitant increase in head MRI (12.1% to 18.7%, P < .0001) and head ultrasound (41.3% to 43.4%, P < .0001) utilization. In 2021, significant variation in risk-adjusted head CT utilization was noted across centers, with hospital head CT rates ranging from 0% to 10% of admissions. Greatest hospital-level variation was noted for patients with codes for seizure or encephalopathy (hospital head CT rate interquartile range [IQR] = 11.6%; 50th percentile = 12.0%), ventriculoperitoneal shunt (IQR = 10.8%; 50th percentile = 15.4%), and infection (IQR = 10.1%; 50th percentile = 7.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Head CT utilization within pediatric hospital NICUs has declined over the past 12-years, but substantial hospital-level variation remains. Development of CT stewardship guidelines may help decrease variation and reduce infant radiation exposure.

Utilization of neonatal sedation and anesthesia: an SPR survey

BACKGROUND

There is little data regarding the use of sedation and anesthesia for neonatal imaging, with practice patterns varying widely across institutions.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the current utilization of sedation and anesthesia for neonatal imaging, and review the current literature and recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One thousand, two hundred twenty-six questionnaire invitations were emailed to North American physician members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology using the Survey Monkey platform. Descriptive statistical analysis of the responses was performed.

RESULTS

The final results represented 59 institutions from 26 U.S. states, the District of Columbia and three Canadian provinces. Discrepant responses from institutions with multiple respondents (13 out of 59 institutions) were prevalent in multiple categories. Of the 80 total respondents, slightly more than half (56%) were associated with children's hospitals and 44% with the pediatric division of an adult radiology department. Most radiologists (70%) were cognizant of the neonatal sedation policies in their departments. A majority (89%) acknowledged awareness of neurotoxicity concerns in the literature and agreed with the validity of these concerns. In neonates undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 46% of respondents reported attempting feed and bundle in all patients and an additional 46% attempt on a case-by-case basis, with most (35%) using a single swaddling attempt before sedation. Sedation was most often used for neonatal interventional procedures (93%) followed by MR (85%), nuclear medicine (48%) and computed tomography (31%). More than half of respondents (63%) reported an average success rate of greater than 50% when using neonatal sedation for MR.

CONCLUSION

Current practice patterns, policies and understanding of the use of sedation and anesthesia for neonatal imaging vary widely across institutions in North America, and even among radiologists from the same institution. Our survey highlights the need for improved awareness, education, and standardization at both the institutional level and the societal level. Awareness of the potential for anesthetic neurotoxicity and success of non-pharmacologic approaches to neonatal imaging is crucial, along with education of health care personnel, systematic approaches to quality control and improvement, and integration of evidence-based protocols into clinical practice.

Children and neonates anesthesia in magnetic resonance environment in Italy: an active call survey

Background

Pediatric anesthesia care in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a challenge for clinicians. The recent debate about the role of anesthetic agent on neural development, encouraged an evaluation of their actual activity in this environment. In this active call survey, the authors sought to delineate the Italian situation regarding national centers, staff involved, monitoring tools available and sedation techniques.

Methods

A complete sample of all national centers performing almost a pediatric discharge in the 2014 was obtained from Health Ministry registers. All Institutions were contacted for a prospective phone investigation and a three-section survey was fill out with the Physician in charge. A descriptive and exploratory analyzes about the organization setting of the Centers were performed.

Results

Among 876 Institution screened, only 106 (37%) met minimal criteria for inclusion. Children are managed by anesthesiologists in the 95% of cases, while neonates in the 54%. A dedicated nurse is present in 74% of centers. While a pulse oximetry is present in 100% of centers, the rate of prevalence of other monitoring is lower. A specific MRI-compatible ventilator is available in the 95% of Centers, but many tools are not equally homogenously distributed. Pharmacological approach is preferred in pediatric age (98%), but its use for newborns is reduced to 43%.

Conclusions

We found significant heterogeneity in the daily clinical practice of sedation in MRI. Our results could be a starting point to evaluate the further evolution of approach to children and neonates in magnetic resonance setting.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04775641.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01821-3.

Dexmedetomidine as a sole sedative for procedural sedation in preterm and neonate infants: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Many different sedation concepts for magnetic resonance imaging have been described for prematurely and term-born infants, ranging from "no sedation" to general anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 receptor agonist that is frequently used to sedate older children, because the anesthesiologist can easily adjust sedation depth, the patient maintains spontaneous breathing, and awakens rapidly afterwards.

AIMS

The present study evaluates whether dexmedetomidine could safely be used as the sole sedative for prematurely and term-born infants less than 60 weeks postconceptional age undergoing diagnostic procedures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of n = 39 prematurely and term-born infants (<60 weeks postconceptional age or a body weight <5 kg) who were sedated with dexmedetomidine for an MRI at a German university hospital from August 2016 to November 2018.

RESULTS

Successful imaging was achieved in all cases. The median initial bolus of dexmedetomidine administered over 10 min was 1.39 μg kg^-1 body weight (range 0.34-3.64 μg kg^-1 ), followed with a continuous infusion at a median rate of 1.00 μg kg^-1  h^-1 (range 0.5-3.5 μg kg^-1  h^-1 ); however, 3 patients (7%) needed some additional sedation (ketamine or propofol). All patients, including 10 infants who had previously required respiratory support, underwent the procedure without any relevant desaturation or apnea. Bradycardia was observed in up to 15 out of 39 cases (38.5%), but only four (10.3% in total and 26.7% of bradycardia) required atropine.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that dexmedetomidine can be safely used for procedural sedation in the high-risk cohort of prematurely and term-born infants less than 60 weeks postconceptional age. Apnea during procedural sedation and subsequent stay in the recovery room is avoided, but bradycardia remains a relevant risk that may require treatment.

Assessing and conveying risks and benefits of imaging in neonates using ionizing radiation and sedation/anesthesia

Neonates represent a unique subset of the pediatric population that requires special attention and careful thought when implementing advanced cross-sectional imaging with CT or MRI. The ionizing radiation associated with CT and the sedation/anesthesia occasionally required for MRI present risks that must be balanced against the perceived benefit of the imaging examination in the unique and particularly susceptible neonatal population. We review the perceived risks of ionizing radiation and the more concrete risks of sedation/anesthesia in term and preterm neonates in the context of an imaging paradigm. When the expected diagnostic yield from CT and MRI is similar, and sedation is required for MRI but not for CT, CT likely has the higher benefit-to-risk ratio in the neonate. However, despite the risks, the most appropriate imaging modality should always be chosen after thoughtful consideration is given to each unique patient and informed discussions including radiology, anesthesia, neonatology and the parents/caregivers are pursued.

Optimizing neonatal cardiac imaging (magnetic resonance/computed tomography)

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT perform an important role in the evaluation of neonates with congenital heart disease (CHD) when echocardiography is not sufficient for surgical planning or postoperative follow-up. Cardiac MRI and cardiac CT have complementary applications in the evaluation of cardiovascular disease in neonates. This review focuses on the indications and technical aspects of these modalities and special considerations for imaging neonates with CHD.

Value of pre- and postnatal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of congenital central nervous system anomalies

Fetal MRI and neonatal MRI of the central nervous system (CNS) are complementary tools that can help to accurately counsel and direct the management of children with anomalies of the central nervous system. Postnatal MRI can add to fetal MRI by allowing for monitoring of changes in the severity of disease, better delineation of a suspected prenatal anomaly, evaluation for secondary pathologies related to the primary diagnosis, and surgical management direction. In this review we discuss the roles of fetal and neonatal MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital anomalies of the CNS through a series of case examples and how both are important in patient management.

Decreased Need for Anesthesia during Ultra-Fast Cranial MRI in Young Children: One-Year Summary

PURPOSE

 Rapid volume coverage sequences based on real-time MRI allow for scanning of the entire brain within a few seconds. Movements of children become almost irrelevant due to the ultra-fast acquisition of 30 ms per slice. The adoption of these sequences in a real-time cranial MRI protocol (RT-cMRI) is expected to reduce the frequency of examinations requiring anesthesia in infants and toddlers. The aim of the study was to quantify the reduction in the number of anesthesia examinations in young children after the implementation of the new RT-cMRI protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 All cMRI studies of children up to 6 years in the first 12 months after the establishment of the RT-cMRI 2019/2020 were retrospectively compared to a matched group of the same period in 2017/2018. The frequency of examinations under anesthesia vs. non-sedation examinations was analyzed. In addition, the number of follow-up examinations and the effectiveness of RT-cMRI was determined.

RESULTS

 The launch of RT-cMRI led to a significant decrease in the proportion of cMRI under anesthesia from 92 % to 55 %. Only 2 % of the RT-cMRI failed and required conventional MRI under sedation in the follow-up. The speed and ease of use of RT-cMRI increased the number of follow-up examinations from 1.3 to 1.4 examinations per child.

CONCLUSION

 This innovative real-time MRI examination allows a drastic reduction in the number of studies under anesthesia for suitable cranial pathologies in children under 6 years. However, cautious selection of indications as well as adjustments to the workflow in the radiological department are required.

KEY POINTS

  · Real-time MRI sequences are almost unaffected by patient movement. · The application of real-time cranial MRI can spare children from sedation. · Low-threshold access results in more frequent follow-up examinations.

CITATION FORMAT

· Sorge I, Hirsch FW, Voit D et al. Decreased Need for Anesthesia during Ultra-Fast Cranial MRI in Young Children: One-Year Summary. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; DOI: 10.1055/a-1561-2430.

Implementation of the Feed and Swaddle Technique as a Non-Pharmacological Strategy to Conduct Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful tool for evaluating brain injury and maturation in preterm infants and often requires sedation to acquire images of sufficient quality. Infant sedation is often associated with adverse events, despite extreme precautions. In this study, the swaddling technique was investigated as an alternative non-pharmacological strategy to obtain brain MRIs of sufficient quality.Methods: We applied the feed and swaddle technique during routine brain MRI as a quality improvement project and compared its morbidity with that of sedation in a historic age-matched group. Seventy-nine very low birth weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit of Ajou University Hospital (Suwon, Korea) were enrolled. Thirty-two (40.5%) infants were in the feed and swaddling group, and 47 (59.5%) were in the sedation group.Results: The morbidity associated with the cardiopulmonary system (swaddling group vs. sedation group: 53.13% [n=17] vs. 63.83% [n=30], P=0.723) and central nervous system (40.63% [n=13] vs. 29.79% [n=14], P=0.217) were not significantly different between groups. The MRI failure rate was not significantly different (swaddling group vs. sedation group: 12.5% [n=4] vs. 4.3% [n=2], P=0.174). The MRI scanning time was longer in the swaddling group than in the sedation group (76.5±20.3 minutes vs. 61.5±13.6 minutes, P=0.001). Cardiopulmonary adverse events were significantly less common in the swaddling group than in the sedation group (3.13% [n=1] vs. 34.04% [n=16], P=0.002).Conclusion: The success rate of MRI was comparable between the swaddling technique and sedation. Furthermore, despite the drawback of prolonged scan time, cardiopulmonary adverse events are fewer with swaddling than with sedative agents. Therefore, swaddling can be an alternative to sedation or anesthesia when performing neonatal MRI scans.

Single-Shot Spinal Anesthesia in an Infant Requiring Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Open Lower-Extremity Surgery: A Case Report

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is a safe and effective anesthetic technique for lower abdominal and lower extremity surgery in neonates and infants and is associated with an apparent state of sedation. We report the use of single-shot SA in a 6-week-old infant for a combined magnetic resonance imaging and open surgical biopsy of a deep soft tissue lower extremity mass. By leveraging the unique qualities of SA (sedation and surgical blockade), we avoided the need for general anesthesia. To our knowledge, this is the first reported use of single-shot SA for an infant undergoing two procedures in the same day.

RAVE-T2/T1 - Feasibility of a new hybrid MR-sequence for free-breathing abdominal MRI in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

The new radial volumetric encoding RAVE-T₂/T₁ hybrid sequence is a modern three-dimensional sequence with multiparametric approach, which includes T₂- and T₁-weighted contrasts obtained in identical slice position during one measurement. However, the RAVE-T₂/T₁ hybrid sequence is not yet being used in clinical routine.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the RAVE-T₂/T₁ hybrid sequence in a pediatric population with a clinical indication for an abdominal MRI examination to demonstrate that the hybrid imaging may be less challenging to perform on children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our retrospective observational study included pediatric patients of all age groups and required for an abdominal MRI examination. Non-contrast standard axial T₁ DIXON and non-contrast RAVE-T₂/T₁ hybrid sequence were obtained at 3 T. MRI studies were analyzed independently by two pediatric radiologists using a 5-point Likert-type scale in five different categories. T₁- and T₂-weighted sequences were each compared with the RAVE-T₂/T₁-sequence using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

The analysis included 15 children (mean age, 11 years and 4 months, 7 girls and 8 boys). The Cohens Kappa of interrater agreement measured 0.62. The T₂ weighted part of the RAVE-T₂/T₁ sequence was significantly better than the standard T₂ HASTE sequence in four of five image quality categories: overall image quality (2.2 ± 0.7 vs 1.8 ± 0,7, p = 0.03), respiratory motion artefacts (3.8 ± 0.4 vs 2.0 ± 0.7, p <= 0.01), portal vein clarity (3.3 ± 0.8 vs 2.2 ± 0.7, p <= 0.01), hepatic margin sharpness (2.4 ± 1,0 vs 1.8 ± 0.7, p <= 0.01). The T₁ weighted part of the RAVE-T₂/T₁ sequence was significantly better than the standard T₁ DIXON weighted sequence in three of five image quality categories: respiratory motion artefacts (4.0 ± 0.2 vs 3.6 ± 0.8, p = 0.01), portal vein clarity (2.7 ± 0.9 vs 2.1 ± 0.7, p <= 0.01), hepatic margin sharpness (3.2 ± 0.7 vs 2.6 ± 0.9, p <= 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The RAVE-T₂/T₁ hybrid sequence is feasible and equal compared to standard T₁- and T₂-weighted sequences in the assessment of abdominal organs in a pediatric population. Due to non-inferiority to the current standard sequences for abdominal imaging, the RAVE-T₂/T₁ hybrid sequence is a good alternative for children who cannot be examined in breath-hold technique.

Brain perfusion imaging in neonates

•

MRI is the modality of choice to image and quantify cerebral perfusion.

•

Imaging of neonatal brain perfusion is possible using MRI and ultrasound.

•

Novel ultrafast ultrasound imaging allows for excellent spatiotemporal resolution.

•

Understanding cerebral hemodynamic changes of neonatal adaptation is key.

Abnormal variations of the neonatal brain perfusion can result in long-term neurodevelopmental consequences and cerebral perfusion imaging can play an important role in diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making. To identify at-risk situations, perfusion imaging of the neonatal brain must accurately evaluate both regional and global perfusion. To date, neonatal cerebral perfusion assessment remains challenging. The available modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound imaging, computed tomography (CT), near-infrared spectroscopy or nuclear imaging have multiple compromises and limitations. Several promising methods are being developed to achieve better diagnostic accuracy and higher robustness, in particular using advanced MRI and ultrasound techniques.

The objective of this state-of-the-art review is to analyze the methodology and challenges of neonatal brain perfusion imaging, to describe the currently available modalities, and to outline future perspectives.

Infant and Child MRI: A Review of Scanning Procedures

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a safe method to examine human brain. However, a typical MR scan is very sensitive to motion, and it requires the subject to lie still during the acquisition, which is a major challenge for pediatric scans. Consequently, in a clinical setting, sedation or general anesthesia is often used. In the research setting including healthy subjects anesthetics are not recommended for ethical reasons and potential longer-term harm. Here we review the methods used to prepare a child for an MRI scan, but also on the techniques and tools used during the scanning to enable a successful scan. Additionally, we critically evaluate how studies have reported the scanning procedure and success of scanning. We searched articles based on special subject headings from PubMed and identified 86 studies using brain MRI in healthy subjects between 0 and 6 years of age. Scan preparations expectedly depended on subject's age; infants and young children were scanned asleep after feeding and swaddling and older children were scanned awake. Comparing the efficiency of different procedures was difficult because of the heterogeneous reporting of the used methods and the success rates. Based on this review, we recommend more detailed reporting of scanning procedure to help find out which are the factors affecting the success of scanning. In the long term, this could help the research field to get high quality data, but also the clinical field to reduce the use of anesthetics. Finally, we introduce the protocol used in scanning 2 to 5-week-old infants in the FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, and tips for calming neonates during the scans.

Predictors of Anesthetic Exposure in Pediatric MRI

BACKGROUND. Anesthetic exposure in children may impact long-term neurocognitive outcomes. Therefore, minimizing pediatric MRI scan time in children under anesthesia and the associated anesthetic exposure is necessary. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pediatric MRI scan time as a predictor of total propofol dose, considering imaging and clinical characteristics as covariates. METHODS. Electronic health records were retrospectively searched to identify MRI examinations performed from 2016 to 2019 in patients 0-18 years old who received propofol anesthetic. Brain; brain and spine; brain and abdomen; and brain, head, and neck MRI examinations were included. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were extracted for each examination, including anesthesia maintenance phase time, MRI scan time, and normalized propofol dose. MRI scan time and propofol dose were compared between groups using a t test. A multiple linear regression with backward selection (threshold, p < .05) was used to evaluate MRI scan time as a predictor of total propofol dose, adjusting for sex, age, time between scan and study end, body part, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, diagnosis, magnet strength, and IV contrast medium administration as covariates. RESULTS. A total of 501 examinations performed in 426 patients (172 girls, 254 boys; mean age, 6.55 ± 4.59 [SD] years) were included. Single body part examinations were shorter than multiple body part examinations (mean, 52.7 ± 18.4 vs 89.3 ± 26.4 minutes) and required less propofol (mean, 17.7 ± 5.7 vs 26.1 ± 7.7 mg/kg; all p < .001). Among single body part examinations, a higher ASA classification, oncologic diagnosis, 1.5-T magnet, and IV contrast medium administration were associated with longer MRI scan times (all p ≤ .009) and higher propofol exposure (all p ≤ .005). In multivariable analysis, greater propofol exposure was predicted by MRI scan time (mean dose per minute of examination, 0.178 mg/kg; 95% CI, 0.155-0.200; p < .001), multiple body part examination (p = .04), and IV contrast medium administration (p = .048); lower exposure was predicted by 3-T magnet (p = .04). CONCLUSION. Anesthetic exposure during pediatric MRI can be quantified and predicted based on imaging and clinical variables. CLINICAL IMPACT. This study serves as a valuable baseline for future efforts to reduce anesthetic doses and scan times in pediatric MRI.

Gentle Touch: Noninvasive Approaches to Improve Patient Comfort and Cooperation for Pediatric Imaging

Pediatric imaging presents unique challenges related to patient anxiety, cooperation, and safety. Techniques to reduce anxiety and patient motion in adults must often be augmented in pediatrics, because it is always mentioned in the field of pediatrics, children are not miniature adults. This article will review methods that can be considered to improve patient experience and cooperation in imaging studies. Such techniques can range from modifications to the scanner suite, different ways of preparing and interacting with children, collaborating with parents for improved patient care, and technical advances such as accelerated acquisition and motion correction to reduce artifact. Special considerations for specific populations including transgender patients, neonates, and pregnant women undergoing fetal imaging will be described. The unique risks of sedation in children will also be briefly reviewed.

The Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Without General Anesthesia Using the "Bundle and Scan" Technique for Infants With Sensorineural Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without general anesthesia (GA) for infants being evaluated for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) using the bundle and scan technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Pediatric tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

All infants who underwent MRI using the bundle and scan technique as part of the diagnostic workup for unilateral or bilateral SNHL between June 2016 to April 2019 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was the proportion of clinically useful images produced.

RESULTS

We reviewed 21 bundle and scan MRI examinations in infants being evaluated for SNHL. Patients had a median age of 10 (range: 6-25) weeks at the time of MRI. Motion artifact was noted in 38% (8/21) of cases. Eighty-six percent (18/21) of the magnetic resonance images produced using the bundle and scan technique were of diagnostic quality and/or sufficient for surgical planning for cochlear implantation. Repeat imaging with GA was required for three cases (14%) as the initial images were not clinically useful. All patients requiring GA had unilateral SNHL. All patients with bilateral SNHL successfully underwent MRI without GA using the bundle and scan technique.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study demonstrate that it is feasible to perform MRI using the bundle and scan technique in the majority of young infants being evaluated for SNHL. This has the potential to help determine cochlear implant candidacy earlier, reduce exposure to GA, and reduce healthcare costs.

Melatonin in neuropaediatric MRI: a retrospective study of efficacy in a general hospital setting

BACKGROUND

Melatonin may offer a safe and cheap alternative to general anaesthesia and sedatives in neuropaediatric MRI. The purpose of our study was to evaluate its efficacy during a daily scanning programme and to assess its financial benefit.

METHODS

Neuro-MRI scans, performed in a general hospital setting after administration of melatonin in 64 children aged 10 months-5 years, were retrospectively reassessed by an experienced paediatric neuroradiologist, rating them as diagnostically contributing or as failed. The financial benefit was calculated.

RESULTS

49/64 scans (77%) were diagnostically contributing, in 11 (22%) no movement artefact was seen in any sequence; 15/64 scans failed (23%), in 3/15 because of serious movement artefacts, in 12/15 the scan was not started. Repeat scans under general anaesthesia were performed in 17 cases (27%): in the 15 failed cases and in 2 cases initially assessed as failed, but were considered diagnostically contributing in the present study. The financial benefit at the time the scans were made was approximately 13,360 Euro.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, the use of melatonin in neuropaediatric MRI, made during a daily scanning programme with a remote waiting room, was associated with a high success rate in infants and young children. A minority of scans had no movement artefacts, indicating most children were not asleep. The sleep-inducing effect of melatonin could therefore not be proven, but the high success rate may be attributed to the sedative and/or anxiolytic effect of melatonin. Only a minority of scans had to be repeated under general anesthesia, leading to a reduction of scan related costs.

MRI Techniques to Decrease Imaging Times in Children

Long acquisition times can limit the use of MRI in pediatric patients, and the use of sedation or general anesthesia is frequently necessary to facilitate diagnostic examinations. The use of sedation or anesthesia has disadvantages including increased cost and imaging time and potential risks to the patient. Reductions in imaging time may decrease or eliminate the need for sedation or general anesthesia. Over the past decade, a number of imaging techniques that can decrease imaging time have become commercially available. These products have been used increasingly in clinical practice and include parallel imaging, simultaneous multisection imaging, radial k-space acquisition, compressed sensing MRI reconstruction, and automated protocol selection software. The underlying concepts, supporting data, current clinical applications, and available products for each of these strategies are reviewed in this article. In addition, emerging techniques that are still under investigation may provide further reductions in imaging time, including artificial intelligence-based reconstruction, gradient-controlled aliasing sampling and reconstruction, three-dimensional MR spectroscopy, and prospective motion correction. The preliminary results for these techniques are also discussed. ^©RSNA, 2020 See discussion on this article by Greer and Vasanawala.

Non-Operating Room Anesthesia: Patient Selection and Special Considerations

Non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) represents a growing field of medicine with an increasing trend in the number of cases performed over the previous decade. As a result, anesthesia providers will need to enhance their familiarity with the resources, personnel, and environment outside of the operating room. Anesthesia delivery in NORA settings should be held with the same high-quality standards as that within the operating room. This review looks at special considerations in patient selection and the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. In addition, there is a discussion on the unique aspects of specific NORA areas and the considerations that come with them.

Experience with a "Feed and Swaddle" program in infants up to six months of age

BACKGROUND

Feed and swaddle is a technique in which an infant is fed and allowed to fall asleep to facilitate diagnostic imaging. This study reviews our experience and diagnostic success in premature and term infants up to 6 months old undergoing brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a feed and swaddle technique and with comparable patients imaged under anesthesia.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of all infants ≤6 months who underwent brain MRI at our institution between 1 January 2013 and 31 March 2016. We recorded and analyzed demographic information, scan indication, scan length, prematurity status, anesthetic technique if used, complications, and diagnostic success or failure.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-four term infants underwent brain MRI using a feed and swaddle technique. The success rate in term infants <90 days was 91.1% (113/124) versus 95.0% (38/40) in infants ≥90 days and ≤181 days old. Fifty-three premature infants underwent feed and swaddle for brain MRI with a diagnostic success rate of 92.5% (49/53). No complications were noted in any feed and swaddle patients. Those who received anesthesia had a diagnostic success rate of 100% (70/70) but experienced complications including hypoxemia, 14.3% (10/70); hypothermia, 18.9% (10/53); bradycardia, 10.1% (7/69); and hypotension, 4.2% (3/70).

CONCLUSION

Given the high rate of success and absence of complications with feed and swaddle in children ≤6 months for brain MRI and the presence of anesthesia-related complications, most infants should undergo a trial of feed and swaddle prior to undergoing brain MRI with anesthesia.

Techniques for minimizing sedation in pediatric MRI

MRI is used widely in infants and young children. However, in these young cases deep sedation or general anesthesia is often required to minimize motion artifacts during MRI examinations. Although the benefits of MR typically outweigh the potential risks of sedation when delivered by an experienced team, there are increasing concerns regarding the affect of sedation on young children. There continues to be a push to develop various strategies that can minimize the need for sedation. The present review summarizes several technical and clinical approaches that can help decrease the need for sedation in the pediatric patient. Optimization of the MRI environment, the role of child life specialists, feed-and-bundle and distraction techniques, noise-reduction methods, artificial intelligence, and MRI advances to decrease both scan times and motion artifacts will be discussed. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.

Fast, free-breathing and motion-minimized techniques for pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality in children with complex medical issues. Patient motion and respiration remain major challenges in pediatric abdominal MRI. Young children ages 3 months to 6 years are unable to cooperate or perform breath-holding and frequently require deep sedation or general anesthesia to undergo MRI. Given the growing concerns associated with the use of sedation and anesthesia as well as the adverse impact on workflow, developing and implementing fast and motion-resistant MRI sequences are of great interest. Fast sequences such as single-shot fast spin echo and balanced steady-state free precession are useful as quick anatomical surveys on routine abdominal MRI. The widespread utilization of parallel imaging and sequences with radial k-space sampling has contributed to decreasing scan time and improving image quality, respectively. Newer strategies including compressed sensing, simultaneous multi-slice acquisition, and hybrid approaches hold the prospect of faster image acquisition that could significantly reduce the need for sedation in this vulnerable population and decrease the time of anesthesia in cases where it is indicated.

Overuse of CT and MRI in paediatric emergency departments

The aim of this review is to survey CT and MRI overuse in the paediatric emergency department (ED) population. CT is one of the most important modalities employed in the ED. Not surprisingly, its high accuracy, rapid acquisition and availability have resulted in overuse. An obvious limitation of CT is ionizing radiation; in addition there are economic implications to overuse. Studies from the last two decades have shown increase in paediatric ED CT utilization in the first decade, reaching a plateau forming around 2008, followed by a decrease in the last decade. This decrease occurred in conjunction with campaigns raising awareness to the risks of radiation exposure. Although a trend of decrease in overuse have been observed, great variability has been shown across different facilities, as well as among physicians, with more pronounced overuse in non-teaching and non-children dedicated EDs. The leading types of paediatric ED CTs are head and abdominal scans. Decision rules, such as PECARN for head injury and the Alvarado score for abdominal pain, as well as using alternative imaging modalities, have been shown to reduce CT overuse in these two categories. MRI has the obvious benefit of avoiding radiation exposure, but the disadvantages of higher costs, less availability and less tolerability in younger children. Although anecdotally paediatric ED MRI usage has increased in recent years, only scarce reports have been published. In our opinion, there is need to conduct up-to-date studies covering paediatric CT and MRI overuse trends, usage variability and adherence to clinical protocols.