Bioimpedence: A noninvasive measure of stroke volume and cardiac output

Non-invasive pulse arrival time is associated with cardiac index in pediatric heart transplant patients with normal ejection fraction

Objective.Cardiac Index (CI) is a key physiologic parameter to ensure end organ perfusion in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Determination of CI requires invasive cardiac measurements and is not routinely done at the PICU bedside. To date, there is no gold standard non-invasive means to determine CI. This study aims to use a novel non-invasive methodology, based on routine continuous physiologic data, called Pulse Arrival Time (PAT) as a surrogate for CI in patients with normal Ejection Fraction (EF).Approach.Electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals were collected from beside monitors at a sampling frequency of 250 samples per second. Continuous PAT, derived from the ECG and PPG waveforms was averaged per patient. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated between PAT and CI, PAT and heart rate (HR), and PAT and EF.Main Results.Twenty patients underwent right heart cardiac catheterization. The mean age of patients was 11.7 ± 5.4 years old, ranging from 11 months old to 19 years old, the median age was 13.4 years old. HR in this cohort was 93.8 ± 17.0 beats per minute. The average EF was 54.4 ± 9.6%. The average CI was 3.51 ± 0.72 l min-1m-2, with ranging from 2.6 to 4.77 l min-1m-2. The average PAT was 0.31 ± 0.12 s. Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between PAT and CI (0.57,p< 0.01). Pearson correlation between HR and CI, and correlation between EF and CI was 0.22 (p= 0.35) and 0.03 (p= 0.23) respectively. The correlation between PAT, when indexed by HR (i.e. PAT × HR), and CI minimally improved to 0.58 (p< 0.01).Significance.This pilot study demonstrates that PAT may serve as a valuable surrogate marker for CI at the bedside, as a non-invasive and continuous modality in the PICU. The use of PAT in clinical practice remains to be thoroughly investigated.

Can bioimpedance cardiography assess hemodynamic response to passive leg raising in critically ill patients: A STROBE-compliant study

Passive leg raising (PLR) is a convenient and reliable test to predict fluid responsiveness. The ability of thoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiography (TEB) to monitor changes of cardiac output (CO) during PLR is unknown.In the present study, we measured CO in 61 patients with shock or dyspnea by TEB and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) during PLR procedure. Positive PLR responsiveness was defined as the velocity-time integral (VTI) ≥10% after PLR. TTE measured VTI in the left ventricular output tract. The predictive value of TEB parameters in PLR responders was tested. Furthermore, the agreement of absolute CO values between TEB and TTE measurements was assessed.Among the 61 patients, there were 28 PLR-responders and 33 non-responders. Twenty-seven patients were diagnosed with shock and 34 patients with dyspnea, with 55.6% (15/27) and 54.6% (18/34) non-responders, respectively. A change in TEB measured CO (ΔCO) ≥9.8% predicted PLR responders with 75.0% sensitivity and 78.8% specificity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.79. The Δd2Z/dt2 (a secondary derivative of the impedance wave) showed the best predictive value with AUROC of 0.90, the optimal cut point was -7.1% with 85.7% sensitivity and 87.9% specificity. Bias between TEB and TTE measured CO was 0.12 L/min, and the percentage error was 65.8%.TEB parameters had promising performance in predicting PLR responders, and the Δd2Z/dt2 had the best predictive value. The CO values measured by TEB were not interchangeable with TTE in critically ill settings.