Higher versus lower mean arterial pressure target management in older patients having non-cardiothoracic surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Characteristics associated with effectiveness in postoperative delirium research: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-regression and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative delirium remains prevalent despite extensive research through randomised trials aimed at reducing its incidence. Understanding trial characteristics associated with interventions' effectiveness facilitates data interpretation.

METHODS

Trial characteristics were extracted from eligible trials identified through two systematic literature searches. Multivariable meta-regression was used to investigate trial characteristics associated with effectiveness estimated using odds ratios. Meta-analysis was used to investigate pooled effectiveness.

RESULTS

We identified 201 eligible trials. Compared with China, trials from the USA/Canada (ratio of odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.45) and Europe/Australia/New Zealand (1.67; 1.29-2.18) had an 89% and 67% higher odds ratio, respectively, suggesting reduced effectiveness. The effectiveness was enhanced when the incidence of postoperative delirium increased (0.85; 0.79-0.92, per 10% increase). Trials with concerns related to deviations from intended interventions reported increased effectiveness compared with those at low risk (0.69; 0.53-0.90). Compared with usual care, certain interventions appeared to have reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium in low-risk trials with low-to-moderate certainty of evidence. However, these findings should be considered inconclusive because of challenges in grouping heterogeneous interventions, the limited number of eligible trials, the prevalence of small-scale studies, and potential publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of postoperative delirium trials varied based on the region of trial origin, the incidence of delirium, and the risk of bias. The limitations caution against drawing definitive conclusions from different bodies of evidence. These findings highlight the imperative need to improve the quality of research on a global scale.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROSPERO (CRD42023413984).

Low Versus High Blood Pressure Targets in Critically Ill and Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES

Hypotension is associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill and perioperative patients. However, these assumptions are supported by observational studies. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aims to compare the impact of lower versus higher blood pressure targets on mortality.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Scholar from inception to February 10, 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized trials comparing lower versus higher blood pressure targets in the management of critically ill and perioperative settings.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up available. This review was registered in the Prospective International Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42023452928.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 2940 studies identified by the search string, 28 (12 in critically ill and 16 in perioperative settings) were included totaling 15,672 patients. Patients in the low blood pressure target group had lower mortality (23 studies included: 1019/7679 [13.3%] vs. 1103/7649 [14.4%]; relative risk 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%). This corresponded to a 97.4% probability of any increase in mortality with a Bayesian approach. These findings were mainly driven by studies performed in the ICU setting and with treatment lasting more than 24 hours; however, the magnitude and direction of the results were similar in the majority of sensitivity analyses including the analysis restricted to low risk of bias studies. We also observed a lower rate of atrial fibrillation and fewer patients requiring transfusion in low-pressure target groups. No differences were found in the other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on pooled randomized trial evidence, a lower compared with a higher blood pressure target results in a reduction of mortality, atrial fibrillation, and transfusion requirements. Lower blood pressure targets may be beneficial but there is ongoing uncertainty. However, the present meta-analysis does not confirm previous findings and recommendations. These results might inform future guidelines and promote the study of the concept of protective hemodynamics.

Personalised blood pressure management during major noncardiac surgery and postoperative neurocognitive disorders: a randomised trial

Background

It remains unknown whether there is a causal relationship between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative neurocognitive disorders. We tested the hypothesis that personalised-compared to routine-intraoperative blood pressure management reduces the incidence of postoperative neurocognitive disorders in patients having major noncardiac surgery.

Methods

In this single-centre trial, 328 elective major noncardiac surgery patients were randomly allocated to receive personalised blood pressure management (i.e. maintaining intraoperative mean arterial pressure [MAP] above preoperative baseline MAP from automated 24-h blood pressure monitoring) or routine blood pressure management (i.e. maintaining MAP above 65 mm Hg). The primary outcome was the incidence of neurocognitive disorders (composite of delayed neurocognitive recovery and delirium) between postoperative days 3 and 7.

Results

The primary outcome, neurocognitive disorders, occurred in 18 of 147 patients (12%) assigned to personalised and 21 of 148 patients (14%) assigned to routine blood pressure management (odds ratio [OR]=0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-1.75, P=0.622). Delayed neurocognitive recovery occurred in 17 of 146 patients (12%) assigned to personalised and 17 of 145 patients (12%) assigned to routine blood pressure management (OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.45-2.17, P=0.983). Delirium occurred in 2 of 157 patients (1%) assigned to personalised and 4 of 158 patients (3%) assigned to routine blood pressure management (OR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.04-3.53, P=0.684).

Conclusions

Personalised intraoperative blood pressure management maintaining preoperative baseline MAP neither reduced the incidence of the composite primary outcome neurocognitive disorders between postoperative days 3 and 7 nor the incidences of the components of the composite primary outcome-delayed neurocognitive recovery and delirium-compared to routine blood pressure management in patients having major noncardiac surgery.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03442907).

PeriOperative Quality Initiative (POQI) international consensus statement on perioperative arterial pressure management

Arterial pressure monitoring and management are mainstays of haemodynamic therapy in patients having surgery. This article presents updated consensus statements and recommendations on perioperative arterial pressure management developed during the 11th POQI PeriOperative Quality Initiative (POQI) consensus conference held in London, UK, on June 4-6, 2023, which included a diverse group of international experts. Based on a modified Delphi approach, we recommend keeping intraoperative mean arterial pressure ≥60 mm Hg in at-risk patients. We further recommend increasing mean arterial pressure targets when venous or compartment pressures are elevated and treating hypotension based on presumed underlying causes. When intraoperative hypertension is treated, we recommend doing so carefully to avoid hypotension. Clinicians should consider continuous intraoperative arterial pressure monitoring as it can help reduce the severity and duration of hypotension compared to intermittent arterial pressure monitoring. Postoperative hypotension is often unrecognised and might be more important than intraoperative hypotension because it is often prolonged and untreated. Future research should focus on identifying patient-specific and organ-specific hypotension harm thresholds and optimal treatment strategies for intraoperative hypotension including choice of vasopressors. Research is also needed to guide monitoring and management strategies for recognising, preventing, and treating postoperative hypotension.

Intraoperative Hypotension in Patients Having Major Noncardiac Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review of Blood Pressure Optimization Strategies

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative hypotension is associated with increased risks of postoperative complications. Consequently, a variety of blood pressure optimization strategies have been tested to prevent or promptly treat intraoperative hypotension. We performed a systematic review to summarize randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of blood pressure optimization interventions in either mitigating exposure to intraoperative hypotension or reducing risks of postoperative complications.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials were searched from database inception to August 2, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (without language restriction) that evaluated the impact of any blood pressure optimization intervention on intraoperative hypotension and/or postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The review included 48 studies (N = 46,377), which evaluated 10 classes of blood pressure optimization interventions. Commonly assessed interventions included hemodynamic protocols using arterial waveform analysis, preoperative withholding of antihypertensive medications, continuous blood pressure monitoring, and adjuvant agents (vasopressors, anticholinergics, anticonvulsants). These same interventions reduced intraoperative exposure to hypotension. Conversely, low blood pressure alarms had an inconsistent impact on exposure to hypotension. Aside from limited evidence that higher prespecified intraoperative blood pressure targets led to a reduced risk of complications, there were few data suggesting that these interventions prevented postoperative complications. Heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes precluded meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Several different blood pressure optimization interventions show promise in reducing exposure to intraoperative hypotension. Nonetheless, the impact of these interventions on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Future trials should assess promising interventions in samples sufficiently large to identify clinically plausible treatment effects on important outcomes.

KEY POINTS

Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future

During surgery, various haemodynamic variables are monitored and optimised to maintain organ perfusion pressure and oxygen delivery - and to eventually improve outcomes. Important haemodynamic variables that provide an understanding of most pathophysiologic haemodynamic conditions during surgery include heart rate, arterial pressure, central venous pressure, pulse pressure variation/stroke volume variation, stroke volume, and cardiac output. A basic physiologic and pathophysiologic understanding of these haemodynamic variables and the corresponding monitoring methods is essential. We therefore revisit the pathophysiologic rationale for intraoperative monitoring of haemodynamic variables, describe the history, current use, and future technological developments of monitoring methods, and finally briefly summarise the evidence that haemodynamic management can improve patient-centred outcomes.

Cerebral autoregulation-based mean arterial pressure targets and delirium in critically ill adults without brain injury: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is a mechanism that acts to maintain consistent cerebral perfusion across a range of blood pressures, and impaired CA is associated with delirium. Individualized CA-derived blood pressure targets are poorly characterized in critically ill patients and the association with intensive care unit (ICU) delirium is unknown. Our objectives were to characterize optimal mean arterial pressure (MAPopt) ranges in critically ill adults without brain injury and determine whether deviations from these targets contribute to ICU delirium.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with shock of any etiology and/or respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, without a neurologic admitting diagnosis. Patients were screened daily for delirium. Cerebral oximetry and mean arterial pressure data were captured for the first 24 hr from enrolment.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with invasive blood pressure monitoring data were analyzed. Optimal mean arterial pressure targets ranged from 55 to 100 mm Hg. Optimal mean arterial pressure values were not significantly different based on history of hypertension or delirium status, and delirium was not associated with deviations from MAPopt. Nevertheless, the majority (69%) of blood pressure targets exceeded the current 65 mm Hg Surviving Sepsis guidelines.

CONCLUSION

We observed that MAPopt targets across patients were highly variable, but did not observe an association with the incidence of delirium. Studies designed to evaluate the impact on neurologic outcomes are needed to understand the association with individualized mean arterial pressure targets in the ICU.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02344043); first submitted 22 January 2015.

Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomised trials

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative hypotension is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes; however these findings are supported only by observational studies. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomised trials was to compare the postoperative effects permissive management with targeted management of intraoperative blood pressure.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase up to June 2023 for studies comparing permissive (mean arterial pressure ≤60 mm Hg) with targeted (mean arterial pressure >60 mm Hg) intraoperative blood pressure management. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up available. Secondary outcomes were atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, delirium, stroke, number of patients requiring transfusion, time on mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

We included 10 randomised trials including a total of 9359 patients. Mortality was similar between permissive and targeted blood pressure management groups (89/4644 [1.9%] vs 99/4643 [2.1%], odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.18, P=0.38, I2=0% with nine studies included). Atrial fibrillation (102/3896 [2.6%] vs 130/3887 [3.3%] odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96, P=0.03, I2=0%), and length of hospital stay (mean difference -0.20 days, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.13, P<0.001, I2=0%) were reduced in the permissive management group. No significant differences were found in subgroup analysis for cardiac and noncardiac surgery.

CONCLUSION

Pooled randomised evidence shows that a target intraoperative mean arterial pressure ≤60 mm Hg is not associated with increased mortality; nevertheless it is surprisingly associated with a reduced rate of atrial fibrillation and of length of hospital stay.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROSPERO CRD42023393725.

Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of opioid-based versus lidocaine-based induction of anesthesia with propofol in older adults: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The present study aims to compare the hemodynamic profile of lidocaine and fentanyl during propofol induction of general anesthesia.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial included patients aged above 60 years undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. The included patients received either 1 mg/kg lidocaine (n = 50) or 1 mcg/kg fentanyl (n = 50) based on total body weight with propofol induction of anesthesia. Patient's hemodynamics were recorded every minute for the first 5 min then every 2 min until 15 min after induction of anesthesia. Hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] <65 mmHg or >30% reduction from baseline) was treated by intravenous 4 mcg bolus of norepinephrine. Outcomes included norepinephrine requirements (primary), the incidence of postinduction hypotension, MAP, heart rate, intubation condition, and postoperative delirium via the cognitive assessment method.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients in the lidocaine group and 46 patients in the fentanyl group were analyzed. None in the lidocaine group experienced hypotension, while 28/46 (61%) of patients in the fentanyl group developed at least one episode of hypotension requiring a median (25th and 75th quartiles) norepinephrine dose of 4 (0,5) mcg, p-value <0.001 for both outcomes. The average MAP was lower in the fentanyl group than in the lidocaine group at all time points after anesthesia induction. The average heart rate was comparable between the two groups nearly at all time points after anesthesia induction. The overall intubation condition was comparable between the two groups. None of the included patients developed postoperative delirium.

CONCLUSION

Lidocaine-based regimen for induction of anesthesia reduced the risk of postinduction hypotension in older patients compared to the fentanyl-based regimen.

Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients Having Surgery: A Narrative Review

Hypotension can occur before, during, and after surgery and is associated with postoperative complications. Anesthesiologists should thus avoid profound and prolonged hypotension. A crucial part of avoiding hypotension is accurate and tight blood pressure monitoring. In this narrative review, we briefly describe methods for continuous blood pressure monitoring, discuss current evidence for continuous blood pressure monitoring in patients having surgery to reduce perioperative hypotension, and expand on future directions and innovations in this field. In summary, continuous blood pressure monitoring with arterial catheters or noninvasive sensors enables clinicians to detect and treat hypotension immediately. Furthermore, advanced hemodynamic monitoring technologies and artificial intelligence-in combination with continuous blood pressure monitoring-may help clinicians identify underlying causes of hypotension or even predict hypotension before it occurs.

Effect of Remimazolam on Postoperative Delirium in Older Adult Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background

Postoperative delirium is common in older adult patients and associated with a poor prognosis. The use of benzodiazepine was identified as an independent risk factor for delirium, but there is no randomized controlled trial regarding the relationship between remimazolam, a new ultra-short acting benzodiazepine, and postoperative delirium. We designed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate if remimazolam increases the incidence of postoperative delirium compared with propofol in older adult patients undergoing orthopedic surgery with general anesthesia.

Patients and Methods

We enrolled 320 patients aged more than 60 with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III who underwent orthopedic surgery. Patients were randomized to two groups to receive intraoperative remimazolam or propofol, respectively. Our primary outcome was the incidence of delirium within 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcome was emergence quality including the incidence of emergence agitation, extubation time, and length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay. Adverse events were also recorded.

Results

The incidence of postoperative delirium was 15.6% in the remimazolam group and 12.4% in the propofol group (Risk ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.21; Risk difference, 3.2%; 95% CI, -4.7% to 11.2%; P = 0.42). No significant differences were observed for time of delirium onset, duration of delirium, and delirium subtype between the two groups. Patients in remimazolam group had a lower incidence of hypotension after induction and consumed less vasoactive drugs intraoperatively, but had a longer postoperative extubation time and PACU stay.

Conclusion

General anesthesia with remimazolam was not associated with an increased incidence of postoperative delirium compared with propofol in older adult patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Association of preoperative prognostic nutritional index with risk of postoperative delirium: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study objective

To assess the association between prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and risk of postoperative delirium (POD) in adult patients.

Methods

MEDLINE, Google scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched from inception till April 2022. The primary outcome was the association between PNI and the risk of POD, while the secondary outcomes were correlations of other prognostic factors with POD risk. The correlation between PNI and the incidence of POD was assessed with three approaches: Difference in preoperative PNI between POD and non-POD groups (Model 1) as well as the association of PNI as a continuous parameter (Model 2) or as a binary variable (i.e., low vs. high using a PNI cut-off value of 50) (Model 3) with POD risk.

Results

Analysis of nine observational studies published from 2010 to 2021 recruiting 3,743 patients showed a POD incidence of 6.4-35%. Our meta-analysis demonstrated a lower PNI among patients in the POD group (MD: -3.78, 95% CI: -4.85 to -2.71, p < 0.0001, I ² = 54.2%) compared to the non-POD group (Model 1). Pooled results revealed a negative association between PNI and POD risk for both Model 2 (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.97, p = 0.002, I ² = 71%) and Model 3 (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.26-2.23, p < 0.0001, I ² = 0%). Besides, while our results supported an age-dependent increase in POD risk, other factors including body-mass index, surgical time, health status, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and male gender were non-significant predictors of POD.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated a negative association between PNI and POD, which warrant further large-scale studies for validation.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022323809.

Higher blood pressure versus normotension targets to prevent acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Renal hypoperfusion is one of the most common causes of acute kidney injury (AKI), especially in shock and perioperative patients. An optimal blood pressure (BP) target to prevent AKI remains undetermined. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized clinical trial (RCT) results to address this knowledge gap.

METHODS

From inception to May 13, 2022, we searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, clinicaltrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP for RCTs comparing higher BP target versus normotension in hemodynamically unstable patients (shock, post-cardiac arrest, or surgery patients). The outcomes of interest were post-intervention AKI rate and renal replacement therapy (RRT) rate. Two investigators independently screened the citations and reviewed the full texts for eligible studies according to a predefined form.

RESULTS

Twelve trials were included, enrolling a total of 5759 participants, with shock, non-cardiac, and cardiac surgery patients accounting for 3282 (57.0%), 1687 (29.3%) and 790 (13.7%) patients, respectively. Compared to lower mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) targets that served as normotension, targeting higher MAP had no significant effect on AKI rates in shock (RR [95% CI] = 1.10 [0.93, 1.29]), in cardiac-surgery (RR [95% CI] = 0.87 [0.73, 1.03]) and non-cardiac surgery patients (RR [95% CI] = 1.25 [0.98, 1.60]) using random-effects meta-analyses. In shock patients with premorbid hypertension, however, targeting MAP above 70 mmHg resulted in significantly lower RRT risks, RR [95%CI] = 1.20 [1.03, 1.41], p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting a higher MAP in shock or perioperative patients may not be superior to normotension, except in shock patients with premorbid hypertension. Further studies are needed to assess the effects of a high MAP target to preventing AKI in hypertensive patients across common settings of hemodynamic instability. Trial registration This systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO ( CRD42021286203 ) on November 19, 2021, prior to data extraction and analysis.

Provisional Decision-Making for Perioperative Blood Pressure Management: A Narrative Review

Blood pressure (BP) is a basic determinant for organ blood flow supply. Insufficient blood supply will cause tissue hypoxia, provoke cellular oxidative stress, and to some extent lead to organ injury. Perioperative BP is labile and dynamic, and intraoperative hypotension is common. It is unclear whether there is a causal relationship between intraoperative hypotension and organ injury. However, hypotension surely compromises perfusion and causes harm to some extent. Because the harm threshold remains unknown, various guidelines for intraoperative BP management have been proposed. With the pending definitions from robust randomized trials, it is reasonable to consider observational analyses suggesting that mean arterial pressures below 65 mmHg sustained for more than 15 minutes are associated with myocardial and renal injury. Advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence may facilitate the management of hemodynamics globally, including fluid administration, rather than BP alone. The previous mounting studies concentrated on associations between BP targets and adverse complications, whereas few studies were concerned about how to treat and multiple factors for decision-making. Hence, in this narrative review, we discussed the way of BP measurement and current knowledge about baseline BP extracting for surgical patients, highlighted the decision-making process for BP management with a view to providing pragmatic guidance for BP treatment in the clinical settings, and evaluated the merits of an automated blood control system in predicting hypotension.