1
|
Alebouyeh F, Boutron I, Ravaud P, Tran VT. Psychometric properties and domains covered by patient-reported outcome measures used in trials assessing interventions for chronic pain. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 170:111362. [PMID: 38615827 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials assessing interventions for chronic pain, describe their psychometric properties, and the clinical domains they cover. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We identified phase 3 or 4 interventional trials: on adult participants (aged >18 years), registered in clinicaltrials.gov between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022, and which provided "chronic pain" as a keyword condition. We excluded diagnostic studies and phase 1 or 2 trials. In each trial, one reviewer extracted all outcomes registered and identified those captured using PROMs. For each PROM used in more than 1% of identified trials, two reviewers assessed whether it covered the six important clinical domains from the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT): pain, emotional functioning, physical functioning, participant ratings of global improvement and satisfaction with treatment, symptoms and adverse events, and participant disposition (eg, adherence to medication). Second, reviewers searched PubMed for both the initial publication and latest review reporting the psychometric properties of each PROM and assessed their content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypotheses testing, criterion validity, and responsiveness using published criteria from the literature. RESULTS In total, 596 trials assessing 4843 outcomes were included in the study (median sample size 60, interquartile range 40-100). Trials evaluated behavioral (22%), device-based (21%), and drug-based (10%) interventions. Of 495 unique PROMs, 55 were used in more than 1% trials (16 were generic pain measures; 8 were pain measures for specific diseases; and 30 were measures of other symptoms or consequences of pain). About 50% PROMs had more than 50% of psychometric properties rated as sufficient. Scales often focused on a single clinical domain. Only 25% trials measured at least three clinical domains from IMMPACT. CONCLUSION Half of PROMs used in trials assessing interventions for chronic pain had sufficient psychometric properties for more than 50% of criteria assessed. Few PROMs assessed more than one important clinical domain. Only 25% of trials measured more than 3/6 clinical domains considered important by IMMPACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farzaneh Alebouyeh
- Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Boutron
- Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, AP-HP, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, CRESS, INSERM, INRAE, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Ravaud
- Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, AP-HP, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, CRESS, INSERM, INRAE, Paris, France; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Viet-Thi Tran
- Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, AP-HP, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, CRESS, INSERM, INRAE, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liang G, Kaur MN, Wade CG, Edelen MO, Bates DW, Pusic AL, Liu JB. Patient-reported outcome measures for primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review of measurement properties. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22:31. [PMID: 38566079 PMCID: PMC10988805 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02248-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess the outcomes of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), a common endocrine disorder that can negatively affect patients' health-related quality of life due to chronic symptoms, has not been rigorously examined. This systematic review aimed to summarize and evaluate evidence on the measurement properties of PROMs used in adult patients with PHPT, and to provide recommendations for appropriate measure selection. METHODS After PROSPERO registration (CRD42023438287), Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Trials were searched for full-text articles in English investigating PROM development, pilot studies, or evaluation of at least one PROM measurement property in adult patients with any clinical form of PHPT. Two reviewers independently identified studies for inclusion and conducted the review following the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Methodology to assess risk of bias, evaluate the quality of measurement properties, and grade the certainty of evidence. RESULTS From 4989 records, nine PROM development or validation studies were identified for three PROMs: the SF-36, PAS, and PHPQoL. Though the PAS demonstrated sufficient test-retest reliability and convergent validity, and the PHPQoL sufficient test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and responsiveness, the certainty of evidence was low-to-very low due to risk of bias. All three PROMs lacked sufficient evidence for content validity in patients with PHPT. CONCLUSIONS Based upon the available evidence, the SF-36, PAS, and PHPQoL cannot currently be recommended for use in research or clinical care, raising important questions about the conclusions of studies using these PROMs. Further validation studies or the development of more relevant PROMs with strong measurement properties for this patient population are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Liang
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value, and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Manraj N Kaur
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value, and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Maria O Edelen
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value, and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W Bates
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Clinical and Quality Analysis, Information Systems, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea L Pusic
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value, and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jason B Liu
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value, and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
do Espirito Santo CDM, Santos VS, Miyamoto GC, Chiarotto A, Santos M, Yamato TP. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D in children and adolescents: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 2024; 13:18. [PMID: 38183127 PMCID: PMC10768350 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02443-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the EQ-5D instruments have been initially designed for adult populations, there are new studies evaluating and applying these instruments to children and adolescents. The EuroQol Group adapted and created two versions designed for these groups, i.e., the EQ-5D-Y versions. The measurement properties of the EQ-5D have been systematically reviewed in different health conditions. However, there is a lack of a proper systematic assessment including the studies' risk of bias and focusing on recent studies assessing the EQ-5D instruments in children and adolescents. The lack of a systematic assessment of the EQ-5D versions does not allow us to have a comprehensive evaluation of the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of these instruments among children and adolescents. This systematic review aims to critically appraise and summarize the evidence on the measurement properties of the EQ-5D instruments (self-reported version - answered by children and adolescents; and proxy versions - versions reported by parents, caregivers, or health professionals) in children and adolescents. METHODS A systematic review searching the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, EconLit, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS-EED), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts and select full texts for eligibility. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology will be followed to conduct three main assessment steps: risk of bias, quality criteria for measurement properties, and evidence synthesis. DISCUSSION This systematic review will provide comprehensive information about the evidence regarding the measurement properties of EQ-5D instruments in children and adolescents of different settings and countries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION Open Science Framework with Registration https://osf.io/r8kt9/ and PROSPERO: CRD42020218382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caique de Melo do Espirito Santo
- Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475, São Paulo, Tatuapé, 03071-000, Brazil.
| | - Verônica Souza Santos
- Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475, São Paulo, Tatuapé, 03071-000, Brazil
| | - Gisela Cristiane Miyamoto
- Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475, São Paulo, Tatuapé, 03071-000, Brazil
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Chiarotto
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marisa Santos
- Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Tiê Parma Yamato
- Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo Rua Cesário Galeno, 448/475, São Paulo, Tatuapé, 03071-000, Brazil
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Center for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Javeed S, Benedict B, Yakdan S, Saleem S, Zhang JK, Botterbush K, Frumkin MR, Hardi A, Neuman B, Kelly MP, Steinmetz MP, Piccirillo JF, Goodin BR, Rodebaugh TL, Ray WZ, Greenberg JK. Implications of Preoperative Depression for Lumbar Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2348565. [PMID: 38277149 PMCID: PMC10818221 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Comorbid depression is common among patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease. Although a well-researched topic, the evidence of the role of depression in spine surgery outcomes remains inconclusive. Objective To investigate the association between preoperative depression and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after lumbar spine surgery. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, Scopus, PsychInfo, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed from database inception to September 14, 2023. Study Selection Included studies involved adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery and compared PROMs in patients with vs those without depression. Studies evaluating the correlation between preoperative depression and disease severity were also included. Data Extraction and Synthesis All data were independently extracted by 2 authors and independently verified by a third author. Study quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to synthesize data, and I2 was used to assess heterogeneity. Metaregression was performed to identify factors explaining the heterogeneity. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the standardized mean difference (SMD) of change from preoperative baseline to postoperative follow-up in PROMs of disability, pain, and physical function for patients with vs without depression. Secondary outcomes were preoperative and postoperative differences in absolute disease severity for these 2 patient populations. Results Of the 8459 articles identified, 44 were included in the analysis. These studies involved 21 452 patients with a mean (SD) age of 57 (8) years and included 11 747 females (55%). Among these studies, the median (range) follow-up duration was 12 (6-120) months. The pooled estimates of disability, pain, and physical function showed that patients with depression experienced a greater magnitude of improvement compared with patients without depression, but this difference was not significant (SMD, 0.04 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.10]; I2 = 75%; P = .21). Nonetheless, patients with depression presented with worse preoperative disease severity in disability, pain, and physical function (SMD, -0.52 [95% CI, -0.62 to -0.41]; I2 = 89%; P < .001), which remained worse postoperatively (SMD, -0.52 [95% CI, -0.75 to -0.28]; I2 = 98%; P < .001). There was no significant correlation between depression severity and the primary outcome. A multivariable metaregression analysis suggested that age, sex (male to female ratio), percentage of comorbidities, and follow-up attrition were significant sources of variance. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that, although patients with depression had worse disease severity both before and after surgery compared with patients without depression, they had significant potential for recovery in disability, pain, and physical function. Further investigations are needed to examine the association between spine-related disability and depression as well as the role of perioperative mental health treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Javeed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Braeden Benedict
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Salim Yakdan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Samia Saleem
- Department of Musculoskeletal Research, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Justin K. Zhang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Kathleen Botterbush
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Madelyn R. Frumkin
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Angela Hardi
- Becker Medical Library, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Brian Neuman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Michael P. Kelly
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children’s Hospital, University of California, San Diego, San Diego
| | | | - Jay F. Piccirillo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Burel R. Goodin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Thomas L. Rodebaugh
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Wilson Z. Ray
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jacob K. Greenberg
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Babiloni-Lopez C, Fritz N, Ramirez-Campillo R, Colado JC. Water-Based Exercise in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. J Strength Cond Res 2024; 38:206-219. [PMID: 38085630 DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000004635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Babiloni-Lopez, C, Fritz, N, Ramirez-Campillo, R, and Colado, JC. Water-based exercise in patients with nonspecific chronic low-back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 38(1): 206-219, 2024-This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize evidence (i.e., active [land-based training] and nonactive controls [e.g., receiving usual care]) regarding the effects of water-based training on patients with nonspecific chronic low-back pain (NSCLBP). Web of Science (WOS), PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, EBSCO (SPORTDiscus; CINAHL), and PEDro were searched, with no date restrictions, until October 2021. The included studies satisfied the following criteria: (a) NSCLBP (≥12 weeks) patients, (b) water-based intervention, (c) control group (land-based trained; nonactive group), and (d) outcomes related to pain, disability, quality of life, or flexibility. The main outcome analyzed in the meta-analysis was pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included disability, body mass index, and flexibility. The random-effects model was used, and effect size (ES) values are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The impact of heterogeneity was assessed (I2 statistic), with values of <25%, 25-75%, and >75% representing low, moderate, and high levels, respectively. Alpha was set at p < 0.05. In conclusion, 15 studies (n = 524) were meta-analyzed. After intervention, pain intensity was reduced compared with nonactive controls (ES = -3.61; p < 0.001) and a similar reduction was noted when compared with land-based trained group (ES = -0.14; p = 0.359). Greater decrease in disability (ES = 2.15; p < 0.001) and greater increase in sit-and-reach (i.e., flexibility; ES = -2.44; p < 0.001) were noted after intervention compared with the nonactive group. In conclusion, water-based exercise therapy reduces pain intensity, disability, and increases flexibility in NSCLBP compared with nonactive subjects and was equally effective compared with land-based exercise to reduce pain. Favorable effects may be expected at ≤8 weeks. However, due to several methodological issues (e.g., high heterogeneity), for the improvement of most outcomes, we are unable to provide other than a weak recommendation in favor of intervention compared with control treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Babiloni-Lopez
- Research Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Nicole Fritz
- Research Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Health, University of Los Lagos, Puerto Montt, Chile; and
| | - Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
- Research Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
| | - Juan C Colado
- Research Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Angarita-Fonseca A, Lacasse A, Choinière M, Kaboré JL, Sylvestre MP, Dinkou GDT, Bruneau J, Martel MO, Hovey R, Motulsky A, Rahme E, Pagé MG. Trajectories of opioid consumption as predictors of patient-reported outcomes among individuals attending multidisciplinary pain treatment clinics. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2024; 33:e5706. [PMID: 37800356 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to identify opioid consumption trajectories among persons living with chronic pain (CP) and put them in relation to patient-reported outcomes 6 months after initiating multidisciplinary pain treatment. METHODS This study used data from the Quebec Pain Registry (2008-2014) linked to longitudinal Quebec health insurance databases. We included adults diagnosed with CP and covered by the Quebec public prescription drug insurance plan. The daily cumulative opioid doses in the first 6 months after initiating multidisciplinary pain treatment were transformed into morphine milligram equivalents. An individual-centered approach involving principal factor and cluster analyses applied to longitudinal statistical indicators of opioid use was conducted to classify trajectories. Multivariate regression models were applied to evaluate the associations between trajectory group membership and outcomes at 6-month follow-up (pain intensity, pain interference, depression, and physical and mental health-related quality of life). RESULTS We identified three trajectories of opioid consumption: "no or very low and stable" opioid consumption (n = 2067, 96.3%), "increasing" opioid consumption (n = 40, 1.9%), and "decreasing" opioid consumption (n = 39, 1.8%). Patients in the "no or very low and stable" trajectory were less likely to be current smokers, experience polypharmacy, use opioids or benzodiazepine preceding their first visit, or experience pain interference at treatment initiation. Patients in the "increasing" opioid consumption group had significantly greater depression scores at 6-month compared to patients in the "no or very low and stable" trajectory group. CONCLUSION Opioid consumption trajectories do not seem to be important determinants of most PROs 6 months after initiating multidisciplinary pain treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Angarita-Fonseca
- Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn Noranda, Canada
| | - Anaïs Lacasse
- Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn Noranda, Canada
| | - Manon Choinière
- Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jean-Luc Kaboré
- Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Marie-Pierre Sylvestre
- Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Julie Bruneau
- Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Marc O Martel
- Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Richard Hovey
- Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Aude Motulsky
- Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elham Rahme
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - M Gabrielle Pagé
- Research Center, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Innocenti T, Salvioli S, Logullo P, Giagio S, Ostelo R, Chiarotto A. The Uptake of the Core Outcome Set for Non-Specific Low Back Pain Clinical Trials is Poor: A Meta-Epidemiological Study of Trial Registrations. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:31-38. [PMID: 37604361 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a meta-epidemiological study on all non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) trial registrations on the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov. We aimed to 1) assess the uptake of the core outcome set (COS) for NSLBP in clinical trials; 2) assess the uptake of the core outcome measurement set for NSLBP in clinical trials; and 3) determine whether specific study characteristics are associated with the COS uptake. After applying the relevant filters for the condition, study type, and phase of the trial, 240 registry entries were included in this study. Only 50 (20.8%) entries showed a full COS uptake, and this rate did not increase over time. Most registry entries that planned to measure physical functioning (n = 152) used the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (n = 74; 48.7%); a small percentage used the numeric rating scale (n = 60; 27.3%) or Short Form-12 (n = 5; 8.3%) if they planned to measure pain intensity (n = 220) or health-related quality of life (n = 60), respectively. Only the planned sample size (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.03) showed a significant but small association with COS uptake. The uptake of the COS for NSLBP is poor. Only 21% of the randomized controlled trials aimed to measure all COS domains in their study registration and COS uptake is not increased over time. Great heterogeneity in measurement instruments was also observed, revealing poor core outcome measurement set uptake. PERSPECTIVE: The Core Outcome Set (COS) for non-specific low back pain was published more than 20 years ago. We evaluated whether trial registrations are using this set of outcomes when testing interventions for low back pain. Full uptake was found only in 21% of the sample, and this is not increasing over time. Researchers should use the COS to ensure that trials measure relevant outcomes consistently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiziano Innocenti
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, the Netherlands; GIMBE Foundation, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Salvioli
- GIMBE Foundation, Bologna, Italy; Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Patricia Logullo
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine (CSM), Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Diseases (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Silvia Giagio
- Division of Occupational Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Raymond Ostelo
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Movement Sciences research institute, the Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Chiarotto
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, the Netherlands; Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Close J, Vandercappellen J, King M, Hobart J. Measuring Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: There may be Trouble Ahead. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1649-1668. [PMID: 37353721 PMCID: PMC10444927 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00501-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Poorly developed patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) risk type-II errors (i.e. false negatives) in clinical trials, resulting in erroneous failure to achieve trial endpoints. Validity is a fundamental requirement of fit-for-purpose PROs, with the main determinant of validity being the PROs items, i.e. content validity. Here, we sought to identify fatigue PRO instruments used in multiple sclerosis (MS) studies and to assess the extent to which their development satisfied current content validity standards. METHODS We searched Embase® and Medline® for MS studies using fatigue-based PROs. Abstracts were screened, PROs identified, and their relevant development papers assessed against seven Consensus Standards for Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria for content development. RESULTS From 3814 abstracts, 18 fatigue PROs met our inclusion criteria. Most PROs did not satisfy at least one COSMIN content validity standard. Frequent omissions during PRO development include: clearly defined constructs; conceptual frameworks; qualitative research in representative samples; and literature reviews. PRO development quality has improved significantly since FDA guidance was published (U = 10.0, p = 0.02). However, scatterplots and correlations between PRO COSMIN scores and citation frequency (rho = - 0.62) and clinical trials usage (rho = + 0.18) implied that PRO quality is unrelated to choice. COSMIN scores implied that the Fatigue Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS) and Neurological Fatigue Index-Multiple Sclerosis (NFI-MS) had the strongest evidence for adequate content validity. CONCLUSION Most existing fatigue PROs do not meet COSMIN content validity requirements. Although two PROs scored well on aggregate (NFI-MS and FSIQ-RMS), our subsequent evaluation of the item sets that generated their scores implied that both PROs have weaker content validity than COSMIN suggests. This indicates that COSMIN criteria require further development, and raises significant concerns about how we have measured one of the most common and burdensome MS symptoms. A detailed head-to-head psychometric evaluation is needed to determine the impact of different PRO development qualities and the implications of the problems implied by our analyses, on measurement performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Close
- Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | | | | | - Jeremy Hobart
- Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Teuwen MMH, Knaapen IRE, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Schoones JW, van den Ende CHM, van Weely SFE, Gademan MGJ. The use of PROMIS measures in clinical studies in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:2731-2749. [PMID: 37103773 PMCID: PMC10474175 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03422-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures is widely advocated, little is known on their use in patients with inflammatory arthritis. We systematically describe the use and outcomes of PROMIS measures in clinical studies involving people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Through a systematic search of nine electronic databases, clinical studies including patients with RA or axSpA and reporting the use of PROMIS measure were selected. Study characteristics, details of PROMIS measures and their outcomes, if available, were extracted. RESULTS In total, 29 studies described in 40 articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 25 studies included RA patients, three studies included axSpA patients and one study included both RA and axSpA patients. The use of two general PROMIS measures (PROMIS Global Health, PROMIS-29) and 13 different domain-specific PROMIS measures was reported, of which the PROMIS Pain Interference (n = 17), Physical Function (n = 14), Fatigue (n = 13), and Depression (n = 12) measures were most frequently used. Twenty-one studies reported their results in terms of T-scores. Most T-scores were worse than the general population mean, indicating impairments of health status. Eight studies did not report actual data but rather measurement properties of the PROMIS measures. CONCLUSION There was considerable variety regarding the different PROMIS measures used, with the PROMIS Pain interference, Physical function, Fatigue, and Depression measures being the most frequently used. In order to facilitate the comparisons across studies, more standardization of the selection of PROMIS measures is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M H Teuwen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - I R E Knaapen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J W Schoones
- Directorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C H M van den Ende
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - S F E van Weely
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M G J Gademan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li X, Zhao K, Li K, Wang W, Feng S, Wu J, He X, Xie S, Hu H, Fan J, Fu Q, Xie F. China Health Related Outcomes Measures (CHROME): development of a descriptive system to support cardiovascular disease specific preference-based measure for the Chinese population. Qual Life Res 2023:10.1007/s11136-023-03416-y. [PMID: 37119354 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03416-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preference-based measures have been increasingly recommended to measure health outcomes for economic evaluation. However, none of existing cardiovascular disease (CVD)-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments are preference-based. This study aimed to develop the descriptive system of preference-based HRQoL instrument for Chinese patients with CVDs under the Initiative of China Health Related Outcomes Measures (CHROME). METHODS Qualitative face-to-face interviews were conducted with Chinese patients with CVDs. Content analysis was employed to generate candidate items for the instrument. Then expert consultation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted to guide further selection and revision of the items. RESULTS We interviewed 127 CVD patients with 67.7% being male and 63.8% living in the urban area. A hierarchical code book comprised of four themes, 20 categories, 62 sub-categories, and 207 codes, was developed. Candidate items were selected based on the criteria set by the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology and ISPOR PRO guidance. An online survey and meeting with an expert advisory panel (n = 15) followed by cognitive debriefing interviews with 20 patients and 13 physicians were conducted to further select and revise the candidate items. The descriptive system of CHROME-CVD consists of 14 items, namely frequency and severity of chest pain, chest tightness, palpitation, shortness of breath, dizziness, fatigue, appetite, sleeping, mobility, daily activities, depression, worry, and social relationship. Four or five level responses were selected based on cognitive debriefing results to each item. CONCLUSION The current study developed the descriptive system (items and response options) of CHROME-CVD, the future CVD-specific preference-based HRQoL instrument for Chinese CVD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Li
- Department of Health Technology Assessment, China National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Kun Zhao
- Department of Health Technology Assessment, China National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China
- Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Kexin Li
- China Alliance for Rare Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjun Wang
- Department of Health Technology Assessment, China National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Siting Feng
- Emergency and Critical Care Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Wu
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaoning He
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Shitong Xie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Hao Hu
- Liaoning Institute of Basic Medicine, Liaoning, China
| | - Jing Fan
- National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
- Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Fu
- China National Health Development Research Center, 9 Chegongzhuang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100444, China.
| | - Feng Xie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hernández-Lázaro H, Mingo-Gómez MT, Jiménez-del-Barrio S, Lahuerta-Martín S, Hernando-Garijo I, Medrano-de-la-Fuente R, Ceballos-Laita L. Researcher's Perspective on Musculoskeletal Conditions in Primary Care Physiotherapy Units through the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): A Scoping Review. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11020290. [PMID: 36830831 PMCID: PMC9953260 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Musculoskeletal disorders are the second cause of disability in the world. The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) is a tool for systematically describing functioning. Outcome measures for musculoskeletal disorders and functioning concepts embedded in them have not been described under the ICF paradigm. The objective of this scoping review was to identify ICF categories representing the researcher's perspective and to compare them with the ICF core set for post-acute musculoskeletal conditions. (2) Methods: This review was conducted as follows: (a) literature search using MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus databases; (b) study selection applying inclusion criteria (PICOS): musculoskeletal conditions in primary care, application of physiotherapy as a treatment, outcome measures related to functioning, and experimental or observational studies conducted in Western countries during the last 10 years; (c) extraction of relevant concepts; (d) linkage to the ICF; (e) frequency analysis; and (f) comparison with the ICF core set. (3) Results: From 540 studies identified, a total of 51 were included, and 108 outcome measures were extracted. In the ICF linking process, 147 ICF categories were identified. Analysis of data showed that 84.2% of the categories in the ICF core set for post-acute musculoskeletal conditions can be covered by the outcome measures analyzed. Sixty-eight relevant additional ICF categories were identified. (4) Conclusion: Outcome measures analyzed partially represent the ICF core set taken as a reference. The identification of additional categories calls into question the applicability of this core set in primary care physiotherapy units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héctor Hernández-Lázaro
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
- Clinical Research in Health Sciences Group, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
- Ólvega Primary Care Health Center (Soria, Spain), Soria Health Care Management, Castilla y León Regional Health Management (SACYL), 47007 Valladolid, Spain
| | - María Teresa Mingo-Gómez
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
- Clinical Research in Health Sciences Group, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
| | - Sandra Jiménez-del-Barrio
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
- Clinical Research in Health Sciences Group, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Ignacio Hernando-Garijo
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
- Clinical Research in Health Sciences Group, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
| | - Ricardo Medrano-de-la-Fuente
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
- Clinical Research in Health Sciences Group, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
| | - Luis Ceballos-Laita
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
- Clinical Research in Health Sciences Group, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Multimedia Instructions for Motor Control Exercises in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain. J Sport Rehabil 2023; 32:424-432. [PMID: 36848900 DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2022-0158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is one of the top 3 diseases that may lead to disability. Current treatment guidelines define exercise as a first-line treatment for nonspecific LBP (NSLBP). There are various evidence-based exercise approaches for treating NSLBP, and many of them include motor control principles. Motor control exercises (MCEs) are better than general exercises that do not include motor control principles. Many patients find learning these exercises complex and challenging, in that MCE exercises have no standard teaching method. The researchers of this study developed multimedia instructions for an MCE program to make teaching MCE easier; thus, more effective. METHODS The participants were randomized into multimedia or standard (face-to-face) instruction groups. We applied the same treatments to both groups at the same dosage. The only differences between groups were the exercise instruction methods. The multimedia group learned MCE from multimedia videos; the control group learned MCE from a physiotherapist with face-to-face instructions. Treatment lasted 8 weeks. We evaluated patients' exercise adherence with Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS), pain with the Visual Analog Scale, and disability with Oswestry Disability Index. Evaluations were made before and after treatment. Follow-up evaluations were carried out 4 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS There was no statistically significant interaction between the group and time on pain, F2,56 = 0.068, P = .935, partial η2 = .002 and Oswestry Disability Index scores, F2,56 = 0.951, P = .393, partial η2 = .033. Also, there was no statistically significant interaction between the group and time on Exercise Adherence Rating Scale total scores F1,20 = 2.343, P = .142, partial η2 = .105. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that multimedia instructions for MCE have similar effects to standard (face-to-face) instructions on pain, disability, and exercise adherence in patients with NSLBP. To our knowledge, with these results, the developed multimedia instructions became the first free, evidence-based instructions that have objective progression criteria and a Creative Commons license.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hernández-Segura N, Marcos-Delgado A, Pinto-Carral A, Fernández-Villa T, Molina AJ. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Instruments and Mobility: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:16493. [PMID: 36554369 PMCID: PMC9779526 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Physical function is one of the most important constructs assessed in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and it could be very useful to assess movement ability from the perspective of the patient. The objective of this study was to compare the content of the domains related to mobility covered by the HRQOL questionnaires based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and to evaluate their quality according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidance. For this, a systematic review was carried out in the databases Scopus, Web of Science and Science Direct. The inclusion criteria were development and/or validation studies about generic HRQOL measures, and the instruments had to include items related to mobility and studies written in English or Spanish. The comparison of content was performed using the ICF coding system. A total of 3614 articles were found, 20 generic HRQOL instruments were identified and 120 (22.4%) mobility-related items were found. Walking was the most represented category. Low-quality evidence on some measurement properties of the generic HRQOL instruments was revealed. The CAT-Health is a useful questionnaire to be used in rehabilitation due to its psychometric properties and its content.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Arrate Pinto-Carral
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, SALBIS Research Group, Campus de Ponferrada, Universidad de León, Avda/Astorga, s/n, 24071 Leon, Spain
| | | | - Antonio J. Molina
- Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), University of León, 24071 Leon, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Remus A, Lempke AFD, Wuytack F, Smith V. Outcome Measurement Instruments and Evidence-based Recommendations for Measurement of the Pelvic Girdle Pain Core Outcome Set (PGP-COS): A Systematic Review and Consensus Process. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:2052-2069. [PMID: 36115519 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
This study provides evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for the instruments to measure the five Pelvic Girdle Pain Core Outcome Set (PGP-COS): pain frequency, pain intensity/severity, function/disability/activity limitation, health-related quality of life and fear avoidance. Studies evaluating measurement properties of instruments measuring any PGP-COS outcome in women with PGP were identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PEDro databases (inception-July 2021). The methodological quality of studies and quality of measurement properties were evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Quality criteria and the synthesized evidence were graded using the modified grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach. A consensus meeting with PGP stakeholders was then held to establish recommendations, based on the evidence, for the instruments that should be used to measure the PGP-COS. Ten instruments were identified from 17 studies. No instrument showed high quality evidence for all measurement properties and/or measured all PGP-COS outcomes. Based on current evidence and consensus, the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), the Short Form-8 (SF-8) and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) are recommended for measuring the PGP-COS. Future research should establish additional measurement properties of instruments and to substantiate these recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandria Remus
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Alexandra F DeJong Lempke
- Division of Sports Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | - Francesca Wuytack
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Valerie Smith
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Garratt AM, Nerheim EM, Einvik G, Stavem K, Edvardsen A. Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD. BMJ Open Respir Res 2022; 9:9/1/e001262. [PMID: 35609940 PMCID: PMC9131054 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) questionnaire is widely used and tested in patients with breathing difficulties. The objective of this study was to translate and undertake the first evaluation of the measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the D-12 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) attending a 4-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme. METHODS Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess structural validity. Fit to the Rasch partial credit model and differential item functioning (DIF) were assessed in relation to age, sex and comorbidity. Based on a priori hypotheses, validity was assessed through comparisons with scores for the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) and clinical variables. RESULTS There were 203 (86%) respondents with a mean age (SD) of 65.2 (9.0) years, and 49% were female. The D-12 showed satisfactory structural validity including presence of physical and affective domains. There was acceptable fit to Rasch model including unidimensionality for the two domains, and no evidence of DIF. Correlations with scores for the CAT, HADS and clinical variables were as hypothesised and highest for domains assessing similar aspects of health. CONCLUSIONS The Norwegian version of the D-12 showed good evidence for validity and internal consistency in this group of patients with COPD, including support for two separate domains. Further testing for these measurement properties is recommended in other Norwegian patients with dyspnoea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gunnar Einvik
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Knut Stavem
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Anne Edvardsen
- LHL Hospital Gardermoen, Jessheim, Norway.,Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ghai V, Subramanian V, Jan H, Doumouchtsis SK. A systematic review highlighting poor-quality of evidence for Content Validity of Quality of Life (QoL) Instruments in Female Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP). J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 149:1-11. [PMID: 35452795 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the content validity of 19 Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used to measure QoL in women with CPP DESIGN AND SETTING: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO databases and Google Scholar from inception to August 2020. We included records describing the development or studies assessing content validity of PROMs. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of PROMs using the COSMIN checklist. Evidence was synthesised for relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. Quality of evidence was rated using a modified GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS PROM development was inadequate for all instruments included in this review. No high-quality evidence ratings were found for relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. QoL was measured using generic instruments (68.42%, 13/19) rather than those specific to chronic pain (21.04%, 4/19) or pelvic pain (10.53%, 2/19). Quality of concept elicitation was inadequate for 90% of PROMs. Half of PROMs did not include patients in their development and only 40% were devised using a sample representative of the target population for which the PROM was developed. Cognitive interviews were conducted in one-fifth of PROMs and were mostly of inadequate/doubtful quality. CONCLUSION There is poor-quality of evidence for content validity of PROMs used to measure QoL in women with CPP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishalli Ghai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, KT18 7EG, United Kingdom; St George's University of London, Crammer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, United Kingdom.
| | - Venkatesh Subramanian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, KT18 7EG, United Kingdom
| | - Haider Jan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, KT18 7EG, United Kingdom
| | - Stergios K Doumouchtsis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, KT18 7EG, United Kingdom; St George's University of London, Crammer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, United Kingdom; Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S. Christeas, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece; American University of the Caribbean, School of Medicine; Ross University, School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ho EKY, Chen L, Simic M, Ashton-James CE, Comachio J, Wang DXM, Hayden JA, Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH. Psychological interventions for chronic, non-specific low back pain: systematic review with network meta-analysis. BMJ 2022; 376:e067718. [PMID: 35354560 PMCID: PMC8965745 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain. DESIGN Systematic review with network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and CINAHL from database inception to 31 January 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION Randomised controlled trials comparing psychological interventions with any comparison intervention in adults with chronic, non-specific low back pain. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and confidence in the evidence. Primary outcomes were physical function and pain intensity. A random effects network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach was performed at post-intervention (from the end of treatment to <2 months post-intervention); and at short term (≥2 to <6 months post-intervention), mid-term (≥6 to <12 months post-intervention), and long term follow-up (≥12 months post-intervention). Physiotherapy care was the reference comparison intervention. The design-by-treatment interaction model was used to assess global inconsistency and the Bucher method was used to assess local inconsistency. RESULTS 97 randomised controlled trials involving 13 136 participants and 17 treatment nodes were included. Inconsistency was detected at short term and mid-term follow-up for physical function, and short term follow-up for pain intensity, and were resolved through sensitivity analyses. For physical function, cognitive behavioural therapy (standardised mean difference 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 1.44), and pain education (0.62, 0.08 to 1.17), delivered with physiotherapy care, resulted in clinically important improvements at post-intervention (moderate quality evidence). The most sustainable effects of treatment for improving physical function were reported with pain education delivered with physiotherapy care, at least until mid-term follow-up (0.63, 0.25 to 1.00; low quality evidence). No studies investigated the long term effectiveness of pain education delivered with physiotherapy care. For pain intensity, behavioural therapy (1.08, 0.22 to 1.94), cognitive behavioural therapy (0.92, 0.43 to 1.42), and pain education (0.91, 0.37 to 1.45), delivered with physiotherapy care, resulted in clinically important effects at post-intervention (low to moderate quality evidence). Only behavioural therapy delivered with physiotherapy care maintained clinically important effects on reducing pain intensity until mid-term follow-up (1.01, 0.41 to 1.60; high quality evidence). CONCLUSIONS For people with chronic, non-specific low back pain, psychological interventions are most effective when delivered in conjunction with physiotherapy care (mainly structured exercise). Pain education programmes (low to moderate quality evidence) and behavioural therapy (low to high quality evidence) result in the most sustainable effects of treatment; however, uncertainty remains as to their long term effectiveness. Although inconsistency was detected, potential sources were identified and resolved. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019138074.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Kwan-Yee Ho
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, School of Health Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lingxiao Chen
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Milena Simic
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, School of Health Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Claire Elizabeth Ashton-James
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Pain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Josielli Comachio
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, School of Health Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel Xin Mo Wang
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, School of Health Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jill Alison Hayden
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Manuela Loureiro Ferreira
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paulo Henrique Ferreira
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, School of Health Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Arwert HJ, Oosterveer DM, Schoones JW, Terwee CB, Vliet Vlieland TP. The use of PROMIS measures in clinical research in stroke patients, a systematic literature review. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2022; 4:100191. [PMID: 35756978 PMCID: PMC9214304 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To systematically describe the use and outcomes of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures in clinical studies in populations with stroke. Data Sources A systematic search on the use of PROMIS measures in clinical stroke studies in 9 electronic databases. Study Selection Studies had to be original, reporting on outcome data using PROMIS measures in populations with stroke (ischemic and/or hemorrhagic), from January 1st, 2007. Initially, 174 unique studies met the inclusion criteria. In 2 steps, titles, abstracts and full-text articles were screened for eligibility (2 authors independently). Data Extraction From the selected articles, study characteristics, type of PROMIS measures, and its outcomes were extracted by 2 authors independently. The authors discussed their views to achieve consensus. A third author was consulted if necessary. Data Synthesis In total, 27 studies (24,366 patients) were included, predominantly from the United States (22); most study populations were hospital-based (20); the number of patients ranged from 30-3283. In general, patients had no or mild symptoms (median modified Rankin scale 1). Two different generic PROMIS measures were reported (PROMIS Global Health, PROMIS 29) and 9 PROMIS measures focusing on specific domains (sleep, pain, physical functioning, self-efficacy, satisfaction with social roles, depression, anxiety, cognition, fatigue). These match the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains mentioned in the Core Set for Stroke. The measures were administered 1-55 months after stroke. Outcome data are provided. Pooling of data was not achieved because of a large variety in study characteristics (inclusion criteria, follow-up moments, data processing). Conclusions The PROMIS measures in this review could be relevant from a patient's perspective, covering ICF core set domains for patients with stroke. The large variety in study characteristics hampers comparisons across populations. Many different outcome measures are used to report results of stroke rehabilitation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henk J. Arwert
- Department of Rehabilitation, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Corresponding author Henk J Arwert, MD, PhD, Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Rehabilitation, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | - Caroline B. Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thea P.M. Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopedics, Rehabilitation, and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions following operative fixation of closed ankle fractures. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:2071-2082. [PMID: 35182304 PMCID: PMC9188494 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03105-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To undertake the first testing and comparison of measurement properties for the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L and 5L in patients with ankle problems. Methods The cross-sectional postal survey of 959 patients aged ≥ 18 years, who underwent surgical treatment (ORIF) for unstable and closed ankle fractures in Eastern Norway. Both the EQ-5D-3L and 5L were included in a postal questionnaire in 2015, 3–6 years post surgery. Missing data, floor and ceiling effects, and response consistency were assessed. Tests of validity included comparisons with scores for the SF-36 and widely used ankle-specific instruments. The 5L version was assessed for test–retest reliability. Results There were 567 (59%) respondents; 501 completed both versions and 182 (61%) the 5L retest questionnaire. The 5L outperformed the 3L in tests of data quality and classification efficiency. Correlations with scores for other instruments largely met expectations, those for the 5L being slightly higher. All 5L scores had acceptable levels of reliability. For the 5L index, the smallest detectable differences for group and individual comparisons were 0.02 and 0.20, respectively. Conclusion The 5L outperformed the 3L in terms of data quality, number of health states assessed and tests of validity. The 5L is recommended in research and other applications following surgery for ankle fracture but further testing including responsiveness to change is recommended at clinically relevant follow-up periods.
Collapse
|
20
|
Tsunoda A, Takahashi T. The Minimal Important Difference of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) Questionnaire for Patients with Posterior Compartment Prolapse: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Anus Rectum Colon 2022; 6:16-23. [PMID: 35128133 PMCID: PMC8801248 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2021-035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The minimally important difference (MID) of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) scale has never been determined. Thus, in this study, we aimed to estimate the MID of the Japanese FIQL for patients with posterior compartment prolapse (PCP). Methods: For 3-months after surgery, we followed a prospective cohort of 136 patients with PCP combined with fecal incontinence (FI) who had undergone ventral rectopexy between 2012 and 2018. Usable data from 114 patients were analyzed. Patients have both completed the FIQL and the 36-Item Short Forum Health Survey (SF-36) before and after surgery. Distribution-based MID values were estimated at 1/2 SD and the standard error of measurement (SEM) for domain and total scores across time points. Changes in the domain scores anchored to changes in a SF-36 overall health assessment question were used to estimate anchor-based MID. To be interpreted as true change, the median, anchor-based MID values that were greater than the corresponding SEM were proposed as estimates of the MID for the FIQL. Results: Distribution-based MID of 1/2 SD for each domain and total score ranged between 0.3 and 0.4, whereas SEM ranges were between 0.2 and 0.3. The anchor-based approach resulted in the median MID estimates of 0.4 to 1.0. Final estimates of MID for each FIQL and total score were as follows: lifestyle (0.6-1.1), coping/behavior (0.8-1.4), depression/self-perception (0.4-0.8), embarrassment (1.0-1.6), and total score (0.7-1.1). Conclusions: The results provide a basis for clinically important differences in FIQL scores after surgery for patients with PCP and FI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Tsunoda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center
| | - Tomoko Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:2267-2279. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03071-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
22
|
Schuttert I, Timmerman H, Petersen KK, McPhee ME, Arendt-Nielsen L, Reneman MF, Wolff AP. The Definition, Assessment, and Prevalence of (Human Assumed) Central Sensitisation in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5931. [PMID: 34945226 PMCID: PMC8703986 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Central sensitisation is assumed to be one of the underlying mechanisms for chronic low back pain. Because central sensitisation is not directly assessable in humans, the term 'human assumed central sensitisation' (HACS) is suggested. The objectives were to investigate what definitions for HACS have been used, to evaluate the methods to assess HACS, to assess the validity of those methods, and to estimate the prevalence of HACS. Database search resulted in 34 included studies. Forty different definition references were used to define HACS. This review uncovered twenty quantitative methods to assess HACS, including four questionnaires and sixteen quantitative sensory testing measures. The prevalence of HACS in patients with chronic low back pain was estimated in three studies. The current systematic review highlights that multiple definitions, assessment methods, and prevalence estimates are stated in the literature regarding HACS in patients with chronic low back pain. Most of the assessment methods of HACS are not validated but have been tested for reliability and repeatability. Given the lack of a gold standard to assess HACS, an initial grading system is proposed to standardize clinical and research assessments of HACS in patients with a chronic low back.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Schuttert
- Pain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9750 RA Groningen, The Netherlands; (I.S.); (H.T.)
| | - Hans Timmerman
- Pain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9750 RA Groningen, The Netherlands; (I.S.); (H.T.)
| | - Kristian K. Petersen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark; (K.K.P.); (M.E.M.); (L.A.-N.)
| | - Megan E. McPhee
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark; (K.K.P.); (M.E.M.); (L.A.-N.)
| | - Lars Arendt-Nielsen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark; (K.K.P.); (M.E.M.); (L.A.-N.)
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology (Mech-Sense), Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Michiel F. Reneman
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9750 RA Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - André P. Wolff
- Pain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9750 RA Groningen, The Netherlands; (I.S.); (H.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Construct Validity and Item Response Theory Analysis of the PROMIS-29 v2.0 in Recipients of Lumbar Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:1721-1728. [PMID: 34818268 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Observational cohort design involving measurement property assessment. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess construct validity through hypothesis testing and to examine reliability and discrimination of the PROMIS-29 v2.0 using item response theory (IRT) analyses. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29.0 version 2.0 includes 28 questions for the seven domains of Physical function, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep disturbance, Social role, and Pain interference, and one item related to pain intensity. To date, the tool has not been tested for construct validity for selected concepts, nor has it been evaluated using IRT in a population of spine surgery recipients. METHODS Using the Quality Outcomes Dataset lumbar registry, we evaluated the construct validity of the PROMIS-29 v2.0 against pain intensity measures for back and leg, the Oswestry Disability Index, the EQ5D 3L-visual analog scale (quality of life) and proxy measures of activities, mobility and self-care. IRT was used to test PROMIS-29 v2.0 assumptions and fit. RESULTS The sample included 652 surgery recipients (mean age = 60.1, SD = 14.0) who had a high level of baseline disability. Hypothesis testing confirmed direction and magnitude of correlation between the PROMIS and legacy measures in 10 of the 12 hypotheses. IRT identified three misfit items, but otherwise adequate scale reliability and unidimensionality. CONCLUSION The PROMIS-29 v2.0 measures several different constructs pertinent to a patient's health and recovery during spine surgery. We feel that the PROMIS-29 v2.0 tool is a useful and effective outcome measure for populations who receive spine surgery.Level of Evidence: 4.
Collapse
|
24
|
Pellicciari L, Chiarotto A, Giusti E, Crins MHP, Roorda LD, Terwee CB. Psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scale v1.2: global health (PROMIS-GH) in a Dutch general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:226. [PMID: 34579721 PMCID: PMC8477486 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the psychometric properties of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Scale v1.2 – Global Health (PROMIS-GH). Methods The PROMIS-GH (also referred to as PROMIS-10) was administered to 4370 persons from the Dutch general population. Unidimensionality (CFI ≥ 0.95; TLI ≥ 0.95; RMSEA ≤ 0.06; SRMR ≤ 0.08), local independence (residual correlations < 0.20), monotonicity (H > 0.30), model fit with the Graded Response Model (GRM, p < 0.001), internal consistency (alpha > 0.75), precision (total score information across the latent trait), measurement invariance (no Differential Item Functioning [DIF]), and cross-cultural validity (no DIF for language, Dutch vs. United States English) of its subscales, composed of four items each, Global Mental Health (GMH) and Global Physical Health (GPH), were assessed. Results Confirmatory factor analyses, on both subscales, revealed slight departures from unidimensionality for GMH (CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.22; SRMR = 0.04) and GPH (CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.12; SRMR = 0.03). Local independence, monotonicity, GRM model fit, internal consistency, precision and cross-cultural validity were supported. However, Global10 (emotional problems) showed misfit on the GMH subscale, while Global08 (fatigue) presented DIF for age. Conclusion The psychometric properties of the PROMIS-GH in the Dutch population were considered acceptable. Sufficient local independence, monotonicity, GRM fit, internal consistency, measurement invariance and cross-cultural validity were found. If future studies find similar results, structural validity of the GMH could be enhanced by improving or replacing Global10 (emotional problems). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-021-01855-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessandro Chiarotto
- Department of Health Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, , University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emanuele Giusti
- Psychology Research Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy
| | - Martine H P Crins
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center
- Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Zuyderland MC Department of Quality and Safety, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center
- Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, de Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Garratt AM, Coste J, Rouquette A, Valderas JM. The Norwegian PROMIS-29: psychometric validation in the general population for Norway. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5:86. [PMID: 34499288 PMCID: PMC8427163 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00357-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System profile instruments include “high information” items drawn from large item banks following the application of modern psychometric criteria. The shortest adult profile, PROMIS-29, looks set to replace existing short-form instruments in research and clinical practice. The objective of this study was to undertake the first psychometric evaluation of the Norwegian PROMIS-29, following a postal survey of a random sample of 12,790 Norwegians identified through the National Registry of the Norwegian Tax Administration. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess structural validity. Fit to the Rasch partial credit model and differential item functioning (DIF) were assessed in relation to age, gender, and education. PROMIS-29 scores were compared to those for the EQ-5D-5L and the Self-assessed Comorbidity Questionnaire (SCQ), for purposes of assessing validity based on a priori hypotheses. Results There were 3200 (25.9%) respondents with a mean age (SD) of 51 (20.7, range 18 to 97 years) and 55% were female. The PROMIS-29 showed satisfactory structural validity and acceptable fit to Rasch model including unidimensionality, and measurement invariance across age and education levels. One pain interference item had uniform DIF for gender but splitting gave satisfactory fit. Domain reliability estimates ranged from 0.85 to 0.95. Correlations between PROMIS-29 domain, SCQ and EQ-5D scores were largely as expected, the largest being for scores assessing very similar aspects of health. Conclusions The Norwegian version of the PROMIS-29 is a reliable and valid generic self-reported measure of health in the Norwegian general population. The instrument is recommended for further application, but the analysis should be replicated and responsiveness to change assessed in future studies before it can be recommended for clinical and health services evaluation in Norway. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00357-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Garratt
- Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Post Box 4404, 0403, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Joël Coste
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 27 rue du faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.,Paris University, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Rouquette
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, 75014, Paris, France.,Public Health and Epidemiology Department, AP-HP Paris-Saclay, 94276, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre Cedex, France
| | - José M Valderas
- Health Services and Policy Research Group (HSPRG), Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), and NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pak SS, Miller MJ, Cheuy VA. Use of the PROMIS-10 global health in patients with chronic low back pain in outpatient physical therapy: a retrospective cohort study. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5:81. [PMID: 34487270 PMCID: PMC8421489 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00360-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although evidence-based guidelines for physical therapy for patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) are available, selecting patient-reported outcome measures to capture complexity of health status and quality of life remains a challenge. PROMIS-10 Global Health (GH) may be used to screen for impactful health risks and enable patient-centered care. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interrelationships between PROMIS-10 GH scores and patient demographics, health status, and healthcare utilization in patients with cLBP who received physical therapy. Methods A retrospective review of de-identified electronic health records of patients with cLBP was performed. Data were collected for 328 patients seen from 2017 to 2020 in three physical therapy clinics. Patients were grouped into HIGH and LOW initial assessment scores on the PROMIS-10 Global Physical Health (PH) and Global Mental Health (MH) measures. Outcomes of interest were patient demographics, health status, and healthcare utilization. Mann–Whitney U and chi-square tests were used to determine differences between groups, and binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) to determine predictors of PH-LOW and MH-LOW group assignments. Results The PH-LOW and MH-LOW groups contained larger proportions of patients who were African American, non-Hispanic, and non-commercially insured compared to PH-HIGH and MH-HIGH groups (p < .05). The PH-LOW and MH-LOW groups also had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), higher rates of diabetes and depression, and more appointment cancellations or no-shows (p < .05). African American race (OR 2.54), other race (2.01), having Medi-Cal insurance (OR 3.37), and higher CCI scores (OR 1.55) increased the likelihood of being in the PH-LOW group. African American race (OR 3.54), having Medi-Cal insurance (OR 2.19), depression (OR 3.15), kidney disease (OR 2.66), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.92) all increased the likeihood of being in the MH-LOW group. Conclusions Our study identified groups of patients with cLBP who are more likely to have lower PH and MH scores. PROMIS-10 GH provides an opportunity to capture and identify quality of life and global health risks in patients with cLBP. Using PROMIS-10 in physical therapy practice could help identify psychosocial factors and quality of life in the population with cLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang S Pak
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California San Francisco, 1500 Owens St., Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| | - Matthew J Miller
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California San Francisco, 1500 Owens St., Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.,Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Victor A Cheuy
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California San Francisco, 1500 Owens St., Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Garratt AM, Furunes H, Hellum C, Solberg T, Brox JI, Storheim K, Johnsen LG. Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:155. [PMID: 34049574 PMCID: PMC8160396 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01792-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The EuroQol EQ-5D is one of the most widely researched and applied patient-reported outcome measures worldwide. The original EQ-5D-3L and more recent EQ-5D-5L include three and five response categories respectively. Evidence from healthy and sick populations shows that the additional two response categories improve measurement properties but there has not been a concurrent comparison of the two versions in patients with low back pain (LBP). Methods LBP patients taking part in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of lumbar total disc replacement and conservative treatment completed the EQ-5D-3L and 5L in an eight-year follow-up questionnaire. The 3L and 5L were assessed for aspects of data quality including missing data, floor and ceiling effects, response consistency, and based on a priori hypotheses, associations with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain-Visual Analogue Scales and Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). Results At the eight-year follow-up, 151 (87%) patients were available and 146 completed both the 3L and 5L. Levels of missing data were the same for the two versions. Compared to the EQ-5D-5L, the 3L had significantly higher floor (pain discomfort) and ceiling effects (mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). For these patients the EQ-5D-5L described 73 health states compared to 28 for the 3L. Shannon’s indices showed the 5L outperformed the 3L in tests of classification efficiency. Correlations with the ODI, Pain-VAS and HSCL-25 were largely as hypothesized, the 5L having slightly higher correlations than the 3L. Conclusion The EQ-5D assesses important aspect of health in LBP patients and the 5L improves upon the 3L in this respect. The EQ-5D-5L is recommended in preference to the 3L version, however, further testing in other back pain populations together with additional measurement properties, including responsiveness to change, is recommended. Trial registration: retrospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01704677.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Garratt
- Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
| | - H Furunes
- Department of Surgery, Innlandet Hospital Gjøvik, Gjøvik, Norway.,University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Hellum
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - T Solberg
- Department of Neurosurgery and The Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine), University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - J I Brox
- University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - K Storheim
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - L G Johnsen
- Department of Neuromedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ibsen C, Schiøttz-Christensen B, Vinther Nielsen C, Hørder M, Schmidt AM, Maribo T. Assessment of functioning and disability in patients with low back pain - the low back pain assessment tool. Part 1: development. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:4841-4852. [PMID: 33945363 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1913648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present the process used to develop the low back pain (LBP) assessment tool including evaluation of the initial content validity of the tool. METHODS The development process comprised the elements: definition of construct and content, literature search, item generation, needs assessment, piloting, adaptations, design, and technical production. The LBP assessment tool was developed to assess the construct "functioning and disability" as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Involvement of patients and health professionals was essential. RESULTS The elements were collapsed into five steps. In total, 18 patients and 12 health professionals contributed to the content and the design of the tool. The LBP assessment tool covered all ICF components shared among 63 ICF categories. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the process used to develop the LBP assessment tool, which is the first tool to address all ICF components and integrate biopsychosocial perspectives provided by patients and health professionals in the same tool. Initial evaluation of content validity showed adequate reflection of the construct "functioning and disability". Further work on the way will evaluate comprehensiveness, acceptability, and degree of implementation of the LBP assessment tool to strengthen its use for clinical practice.Implications for RehabilitationA biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach is a strong foundation for identifying the many relevant aspects related to low back pain (LBP).Responding to a lack of tools to support a biopsychosocial and patients-centred approach the LBP assessment tool was developed using a robust, multi-step process with involvement of patients and health professionals.The LBP assessment tool is a strong candidate for a user-friendly tool to facilitate use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Ibsen
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Berit Schiøttz-Christensen
- Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Hospital Lillebaelt, Middelfart, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Claus Vinther Nielsen
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM, Aarhus, Denmark.,Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark
| | - Mogens Hørder
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit of User Perspectives, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne Mette Schmidt
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM, Aarhus, Denmark.,SANO Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Thomas Maribo
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Benz T, Lehmann S, Elfering A, Sandor PS, Angst F. Comprehensiveness and validity of a multidimensional assessment in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:291. [PMID: 33743669 PMCID: PMC7981999 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04130-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic low back pain is a multidimensional syndrome affecting physical activity and function, health-related quality of life and employment status. The aim of the study was to quantify the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of single measurement scales in specific construct domains and to examine how they combine to build a comprehensive outcome, covering the complex construct of chronic low back pain before and after a standardized interdisciplinary pain program. Methods This prospective cohort study assessed 177 patients using the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 2 functional performance tests, the Back Performance Scale (BPS) and the 6-Minute Walking Distance (6MWD). The comprehensiveness and overlap of the constructs used were quantified cross-sectionally and longitudinally by bivariate correlations, exploratory factor analysis, and effect sizes. Results The mean age of the participants was 48.0 years (+/− 12.7); 59.3% were female. Correlations of baseline scores ranged from r = − 0.01 (BPS with MPI Life control) to r = 0.76 (SF-36 Mental health with MPI Negative mood). SF-36 Physical functioning correlated highest with the functional performance tests (r = 0.58 BPS, 0.67 6MWD) and ODI (0.56). Correlations of change scores (difference of follow-up – baseline score) were consistent but weaker. Factor analysis revealed 2 factors: “psychosocial” and “pain & function” (totally explained variance 44.0–60.9%). Psychosocial factors loaded strongest (up to 0.89 SCL-90-R) on the first factor, covering 2/3 of the explained variance. Pain and function (ing) loaded more strongly on the second factor (up to 0.81 SF-36 Physical functioning at follow-up). All scales showed improvements, with effect sizes ranging from 0.16–0.67. Conclusions Our results confirm previous findings that the chronic low back pain syndrome is highly multifactorial and comprises many more dimensions of health and quality of life than merely back-related functioning. A comprehensive outcome measurement should include the predominant psychosocial domain and a broad spectrum of measurement constructs in order to assess the full complexity of the chronic low back syndrome. Convergence and divergence of the scales capture the overlapping contents and nuances within the constructs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Benz
- Research Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Zurzach Care Group, Quellenstrasse 34, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland. .,Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, Bern, Switzerland. .,Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. .,Institute of Physiotherapy, School of Health Professions, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
| | - Susanne Lehmann
- Research Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Zurzach Care Group, Quellenstrasse 34, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland
| | - Achim Elfering
- Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter S Sandor
- Research Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Zurzach Care Group, Quellenstrasse 34, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland
| | - Felix Angst
- Research Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Zurzach Care Group, Quellenstrasse 34, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yang CY, Tsai YA, Wu PK, Ho SY, Chou CY, Huang SF. Pilates-based core exercise improves health-related quality of life in people living with chronic low back pain: A pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2021; 27:294-299. [PMID: 34391248 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effects of Pilates exercise on improving health-related quality of life in people living with chronic low back pain. METHODS This was a single-blind, randomised clinical trial. Thirty-nine physically active subjects aged between 30 and 70 years with nonspecific chronic low back pain for more than three months were recruited. The study employed a pretest-posttest design, with a 4 -, 8 -, and 26-week follow-up. For eight weeks, the intervention group participated in a group-supervised, mat-based Pilates program, while the control group received the usual pharmacologic and rehabilitation standard of care, including patient education on chronic low back pain. The primary outcome was self-perceived health status measured using the EQ-5D questionnaire in a structured form and a visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes included intensity of pain and degree of disability. RESULTS By the end of the 8-week Pilates program, the intervention group achieved a better health-related quality of life on the EQ-5D visual analogue score than the control group. In assessing the trends in each individual group regarding pain, the intervention group demonstrated an earlier pain reduction than the control group that lasted until the end of the trial. CONCLUSIONS An 8-week supervised Pilates-based core exercise program is an effective therapeutic modality for improving self-perceived health status in patients with chronic low back pain. This finding could inform clinicians of better alternatives when they suggest exercise interventions for chronic low back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Ya Yang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Chiayi and Wanqiao Branch, Chiayi, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yun-An Tsai
- Neural Regeneration and Repair Division, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pi-Keng Wu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Keelung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Sih-Ying Ho
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital Yuanshan Branch, Yilan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Yi Chou
- College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Fong Huang
- Neural Regeneration and Repair Division, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vishwanathan K, Braithwaite I. Construct validity and responsiveness of commonly used patient reported outcome instruments in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 16:125-131. [PMID: 33717946 PMCID: PMC7920003 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Validity and responsiveness of Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland Morris disability questionnaires (RMDQ), Short Form-12 Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS) and Short Form-12 Mental Component Score (SF-12 MCS) in patients undergoing open decompression for lumbar canal stenosis has not been previously reported. METHODS Outcome assessment was prospectively evaluated using the ODI, RMDQ, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS pre-intervention and at average follow-up of three months post-intervention. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association between change in values of ODI, RMDQ, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS. Distribution based methods (Effect size [ES], standardised response mean [SRM]) and anchor based method (Area under the curve [AUC] of receiver operating curve [ROC]) were used to determine responsiveness. AUC value ≥ 0.70 is considered as adequate level of responsiveness and the outcome instrument with the largest AUC is considered to be the most responsive outcome instrument. RESULTS This study included 77 participants. Responsiveness was assessed at a mean follow-up of 12 weeks postoperatively. There was significant strong correlation between ODI and RMDQ (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001). The ES of ODI, RMDQ, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS were 1.54, 1.48, 1.85 and 0.51 respectively. The SRM of RMDQ, ODI, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS were 1.22, 1.17, 1.0 and 0.47 respectively. AUC of ODI, RMDQ, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS were 0.83-0.88, 0.82 to 0.86, 0.78 to 0.81 and 0.69 to 0.70 respectively. CONCLUSION It is recommended to use either ODI or RMDQ as region specific patient reported outcome instrument and SF-12 PCS as a health related quality of life outcome instrument to evaluate outcome after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis.
Collapse
Key Words
- AUC, Area under the curve
- ES, Effect Size
- HRQoL, Health Related Quality of Life
- Lumbar stenosis
- MCID, Minimal Clinically Important Difference
- NRS, Numerical Rating Scale
- ODI, Oswestry Disability Index
- Oswestry disability index
- RMDQ, Roland Morris disability questionnaires
- ROC, Receiver Operating Curve
- Responsiveness
- Roland morris disability questionnaire
- SF-12
- SF-12 PCS, Short Form-12 Physical Component Score
- SF12-MCS, Short Form-12 Mental Component Score
- SRM, Standardised Response Mean
- VAS, Visual Analogue Scale
- Validity
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karthik Vishwanathan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Parul University, Waghodia, Vadodara, India,Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedics, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Faculty of Medicine, Parul University, P.O Limda, Waghodia, Vadodara, 391760, India.
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Psychometric properties of Short Form-36 Health Survey, EuroQol 5-dimensions, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with chronic pain. Pain 2021; 161:83-95. [PMID: 31568237 PMCID: PMC6940032 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. This large-sample item response theory-based evaluation assessed the measurement properties of SF-36, EQ-5D, and hospital anxiety and depression scale for chronic pain patients in clinical settings. Recent research has highlighted a need for the psychometric evaluation of instruments targeting core domains of the pain experience in chronic pain populations. In this study, the measurement properties of Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36),EuroQol 5-dimensions (EQ-5D) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were analyzed within the item response-theory framework based on data from 35,908 patients. To assess the structural validity of these instruments, the empirical representations of several conceptually substantiated latent structures were compared in a cross-validation procedure. The most structurally sound representations were selected from each questionnaire and their internal consistency reliability computed as a summary of their precision. Finally, questionnaire scores were correlated with each other to evaluate their convergent and discriminant validity. Our results supported that SF-36 is an acceptable measure of 2 independent constructs of physical and mental health. By contrast, although the approach to summarize the health-related quality of life construct of EQ-5D as a unidimensional score was valid, its low reliability rendered practical model implementation of doubtful utility. Finally, rather than being separated into 2 subscales of anxiety and depression, HADS was a valid and reliable measure of overall emotional distress. In support of convergent and discriminant validity, correlations between questionnaires showed that theoretically similar traits were highly associated, whereas unrelated traits were not. Our models can be applied to score SF-36 and HADS in chronic pain patients, but we recommend against using the EQ-5D model due to its low reliability. These results are useful for researchers and clinicians involved in chronic pain populations because questionnaires' properties determine their discriminating ability in patient status assessment.
Collapse
|
33
|
Busija L, Ackerman IN, Haas R, Wallis J, Nolte S, Bentley S, Miura D, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. Adult Measures of General Health and Health‐Related Quality of Life. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72 Suppl 10:522-564. [DOI: 10.1002/acr.24216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Romi Haas
- Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia, and Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Jason Wallis
- Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia, and Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Sandra Nolte
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany, ICON GmbH, Munich, Germany, and Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia
| | - Sharon Bentley
- Queensland University of Technology Kelvin Grove Queensland Australia
| | | | - Melanie Hawkins
- Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia, and Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia, and Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Eftekharsadat B, Fasaie N, Golalizadeh D, Babaei-Ghazani A, Jahanjou F, Eslampoor Y, Dolatkhah N. Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21:695. [PMID: 33076888 PMCID: PMC7574569 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03714-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of corticosteroid trigger point injection (TPI) versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle. METHODS In this single-blind randomized clinical trial, 54 low back pain patients with myofascial trigger points on QL muscle were investigated. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups with A and B pockets. Patients in group A underwent radial ESWT and received 5 treatment sessions (1 per week) and actually were not followed-up. However, patients in group B received corticosteroid TPI and received one session of corticosteroid treatment and followed-up for 4 weeks after injection. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), pain pressure threshold (PPT) and short form (36) health survey (SF-36) were measured in both groups before, two weeks after and four weeks after intervention. RESULTS The between group comparison indicated that corticosteroid TPI leaded to significant higher improvements of ODI (P-value< 0.01), VAS (P value< 0.001), and PPT (P-value = 0.001) scores compared to the ESWT group at two-week follow-up time-point. ESWT group recorded significant higher improvement of ODI (P-value< 0.01) and SF-36 (P-value< 0.001) compared to the corticosteroid TPI at 4th week post treatment evaluation. At four-week follow-up time-point, the patients in the ESWT group were 1.46 times more likely to achieve 30% reduction in VAS, 2.67 times more likely to achieve 30% reduction in ODI, and 2.30 times more likely to achieve 20% improvement in SF-36 compared to the participants in corticosteroid TPI group. These results refer to large effect size for all study outcomes in ESWT group (d = 4.72, d = 1.58, d = 5.48, and d = 7.47 for ODI, PPT, SF-36, and VAS, respectively). CONCLUSION Corticosteroid TPI was more effective compared to ESWT in short-term controlling of pain and disability caused by myofascial pain syndrome of QL muscle. However, after 4 weeks treatment, ESWT further improved the quality of life and disability and was related with more probability of achievement the minimal clinically important difference concerning pain, disability and quality of life and large effect size for all study outcomes in treated patients compared to corticosteroid TPI. TRIAL REGISTRATION www.irct.ir , IRCT20100827004641N14 , retrospectively registered 2019-01-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bina Eftekharsadat
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Aging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Negar Fasaie
- Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Dina Golalizadeh
- Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Arash Babaei-Ghazani
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Yashar Eslampoor
- Palliative Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Neda Dolatkhah
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Aging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Powell PA, Carlton J, Woods HB, Mazzone P. Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:263. [PMID: 32746836 PMCID: PMC7397669 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01511-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited X-linked neuromuscular disorder. A number of questionnaires are available to assess quality of life in DMD, but there are concerns about their validity. This systematic review aimed to appraise critically the content and structural validity of quality of life instruments for DMD. Five databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library) were searched, with supplementary searches in Google Scholar. We included articles with evidence on the content and/or structural validity of quality of life instruments in DMD, and/or instrument development. Evidence was evaluated against the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. Fifty five articles featured a questionnaire assessing quality of life in DMD. Forty instruments were extracted and 26 underwent assessment. Forty-one articles contained evidence on content or structural validity (including 37 development papers). Most instruments demonstrated low quality evidence and unsatisfactory or inconsistent validity in DMD, with the majority not featuring direct validation studies in this population. Only KIDSCREEN received an adequate rating for instrument design and a satisfactory result for content validity based on its development, yet, like the majority of PROMs, the measure has not been directly validated for use in DMD. Further research is needed on the validity of quality of life instruments in DMD, including content and structural validity studies in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip A Powell
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. .,Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, 9 Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 4DT, UK.
| | - Jill Carlton
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Helen Buckley Woods
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Paolo Mazzone
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Close J, Baines K, Burke L, Hobart J. Measuring upper limb function in MS: Which existing patient reported outcomes are fit for purpose? eNeurologicalSci 2020; 19:100237. [PMID: 32258444 PMCID: PMC7125352 DOI: 10.1016/j.ensci.2020.100237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple Sclerosis (MS) clinical trials increasingly focus on progressive and advanced MS, with upper limb function (ULF) as a key outcome. Within clinical trials, Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) quantify clinical variables and establish meaningfulness of changes. Scientific standards and regulatory criteria (from Food and Drug Administration [FDA]) require PROs be “fit-for-purpose”: well-defined and reliable measures of specific concepts in defined contexts. Objective To identify, from literature, existing PROs measuring ULF and determine which satisfy scientific and regulatory clinical trials requirements. Method We screened PubMed/Web of Science using multiple relevant terms. Abstracts and full texts were screened using suitability criteria. PRO development papers were evaluated using recently expanded Consensus Standards for Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria for content development. Results We identified 3619 articles; 485 used 24 different ULF PROs. No PRO satisfied scientific and regulatory requirements as a well-defined measure of a clearly defined construct in a specific clinical context. Conclusions Existing ULF PROs don't meet fit-for-purpose criteria. MS clinical trials require new measures with greater emphasis on patient engagement to derive theoretical frameworks, concepts of interest, and contexts of use followed by systematic literature searches, expert input, and qualitative research to support item generation. Until then, trials will miss aspects of meaningful within-patient change and thereby misrepresent (likely underestimating) treatment effects. With MS clinical trials increasingly focusing on progressive and advanced MS, we searched for and assessed existing Upper Limb Function (ULF) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) for MS clinical trials We established that existing PROs for ULF in MS do not meet regulatory and scientific criteria for content validity. In fact, we established that the content development of existing PROs is worrisome – often falling short of guidelines around conceptual development, qualitative involvement of patients, use of representative samples and well-documented literature searches. These results reiterate the work of other authors, where poor historical PRO content development has been established in various clinical contexts. New measures are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Close
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth Science Park, Davy Road, Plymouth, Devon PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Kathryn Baines
- Institute of Translational & Stratified Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth Science Park, Davy Road, Plymouth, Devon PL6 8BX, UK
| | | | - Jeremy Hobart
- Institute of Translational & Stratified Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth Science Park, Davy Road, Plymouth, Devon PL6 8BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Validation of PROMIS CATs and PROMIS Global Health in an Interdisciplinary Pain Program for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2020; 45:E227-E235. [PMID: 31513107 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To (1) confirm validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and pain interference computer-adaptive tests (CATs) and (2) assess the validity of PROMIS Global Health (GH) and five additional PROMIS CATs: social role satisfaction, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance in a population of patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) who completed a 3-month Interdisciplinary Pain Program (IPP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Recent recommendations for assessing outcomes in patients with cLBP have included PROMIS scales; however, there is a need for further evaluation, and PROMIS GH has not been studied in this population. METHODS The study cohort included patients with cLBP who completed the entirety of a 3-month IPP between August 2016 and December 2018. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed before the start of the IPP and at graduation. Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients. Known groups' validity assessed the change in PROMIS scores stratified by improvement on the Modified LBP Disability Questionnaire. Responsiveness was evaluated with standardized response means based on global impression of change. RESULTS IPP was completed by 217 patients (67.7% women, age 53.8 ± 12.8). Convergent validity was supported (P < 0.01 for all pairwise PROMs comparisons). All PROMs improved significantly by graduation, with the largest improvement for PROMIS pain interference, physical function, social role satisfaction, and Modified LBP Disability Questionnaire. Known groups' validity demonstrated the greatest change on PROMIS physical function, social role satisfaction, pain interference, and depression. Responsiveness was supported for all PROMs in 170 (78.3%) patients who indicated at least minimal improvement (standardized response means 0.43-1.06). CONCLUSION Our study provides support of PROMIS CATs, highlights the importance of including other meaningful outcome measures, such as social role satisfaction, and provides the first validation of PROMIS GH, in patients with cLBP. PROMs collection can be streamlined through the use of PROMIS CATs which offer advantages over legacy measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
38
|
Evaluation of measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments for burns: A systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020; 88:555-571. [DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
39
|
Clinimetrics: A core outcome measurement set for low back pain. J Physiother 2020; 66:58. [PMID: 31477503 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
40
|
Parai C, Hägg O, Lind B, Brisby H. ISSLS prize in clinical science 2020: the reliability and interpretability of score change in lumbar spine research. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2019; 29:663-669. [PMID: 31760488 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06222-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Revised: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A statistically significant score change of a PROM (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure) can be questioned if it does not exceed the clinically Minimal Important Change (MIC) or the SDC (Smallest Detectable Change) of the particular measure. The aim of the study was to define the SDC of three common PROMs in degenerative lumbar spine surgery: Numeric Rating Scale (NRSBACK/LEG), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Euroqol-5-Dimensions (EQ-5DINDEX) and to compare them to their MICs. The transition questions Global Assessment (GABACK/LEG) were also explored. METHODS Reliability analyses were performed on a test-retest population of 182 symptomatically stable patients, with similar characteristics as the Swespine registry population, who underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar spine conditions 2017-2018. The MIC values were based on the entire registry (n = 98,732) using the ROC curve method. The ICC for absolute agreement was calculated in a two-way random-effects single measures model. For categorical variables, weighted kappa and exact agreement were computed. RESULTS For the NRS, the SDC exceeded the MIC (NRSBACK:3.6 and 2.7; NRSLEG: 3.7 and 3.2, respectively), while they were of an equal size of 18 for the ODI. The gap between the two estimates was remarkable in the EQ-5DINDEX, where SDC was 0.49 and MIC was 0.10. The GABACK/LEG showed an excellent agreement between the test and the retest occasion. CONCLUSION For the tested PROM scores, the changes must be considerable in order to distinguish a true change from random error in degenerative lumbar spine surgery research. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Parai
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. .,Spine Center Göteborg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - O Hägg
- Spine Center Göteborg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - B Lind
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Spine Center Göteborg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - H Brisby
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rannisto S, Okuloff A, Uitti J, Paananen M, Rannisto PH, Malmivaara A, Karppinen J. Correction of leg-length discrepancy among meat cutters with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20:105. [PMID: 30871549 PMCID: PMC6417033 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2478-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The etiology of non-specific low back pain (LBP) is complex and not well understood. LBP is common and causes a remarkable health burden worldwide. Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) is potentially a risk factor for development of LBP, although this relationship has been questioned. Yet only one randomized controlled study (RCT) has been performed. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of insoles with leg-length discrepancy (LLD) correction compared to insoles without LLD correction among meat cutters in a RCT-design. Methods The study population consisted 387 meat cutters who were over 35 years old and had been working 10 years or more. The LLD measurement was done by a laser ultrasound technique. All workers with an LLD of at least 5 mm and an LBP intensity of at least 2 on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale were eligible. The LLD of all the participants in the intervention group was corrected 70%, which means that if the LLD was for example 10 mm the correction was 7 mm. The insoles were used at work for eight hours per day. The control group had insoles without LLD correction. The primary outcome was between-group difference in LBP intensity. Secondary outcomes included sciatic pain intensity, disability (Roland Morris), RAND-36, the Oswestry Disability Index, physician visits and days on sick leave over the first year. We used a repeated measures regression analysis with adjustments for age, gender and BMI. The hurdle model was used for days on sick leave. Results In all, 169 workers were invited and 114 (67%) responded. Of them, 42 were eligible and were randomized to the intervention (n = 20) or control group (n = 22). The workers in the intervention group had a higher improvement in LBP intensity (− 2.6; 95% confidence intervals − 3.7 – − 1.4), intensity of sciatic pain (− 2.3; − 3.4 – − 1.07) and RAND-36 physical functioning (9.6; 1.6–17.6) and a lesser likelihood of sick leaves (OR -3.7; − 7.2 - -0.2). Conclusions Correction of LLD with insoles was an effective intervention among workers with LBP and a standing job. Trial registration ISRCTN11898558. Registration date 11. Feb 2011. BioMed Central Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satu Rannisto
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33014, Tampere Yliopisto, Finland.
| | - Annaleena Okuloff
- Information Systems Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jukka Uitti
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Tampere, Finland.,Clinic of Occupational Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.,Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33014, Tampere Yliopisto, Finland
| | - Markus Paananen
- Medical Research Centre Oulu, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Pasi-Heikki Rannisto
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Health sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Malmivaara
- Centre for Health and Social Economics, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.,Orton Orthopaedic Hospital and Orton Research Institute, Orton Foundation, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jaro Karppinen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Tampere, Finland.,Medical Research Centre Oulu, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.,Center for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wei W, Tang HY, Li YZ, Wang TS. Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave for low back pain: A protocol of systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e14511. [PMID: 30762785 PMCID: PMC6408122 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000014511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous clinical trials have reported that extracorporeal shock wave (EPSW) can be used to treat low back pain (LBP), and have achieved satisfied effect. However, its effectiveness is still inconclusive. Thus, this systematic review will aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of EPSW for patients with LBP. METHODS In this systematic review, the electronic databases of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PUBMED, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and Wanfang Data will be searched from inception to January 1, 2019. Randomized controlled trials and case-control studies that assessed the effectiveness and safety of EPSW for LBP will be included. The primary outcome is pain intensity. The secondary outcomes are functional status, quality of life, psychological outcomes, as well as the adverse events. All process of the study selection, data extraction, and methodology evaluation will be carried out by two authors independently. RevMan 5.3 software will be utilized for statistical analysis. RESULTS This study will provide a detailed summary of latest evidence related to the effectiveness and safety of EPSW in pain relief, improvement of functional status, quality of life, and psychological disorders in patients with LBP. CONCLUSION The findings of this study may provide possible guidance for LBP treated by EPSW. DISSEMINATION AND ETHICS Ethical approval is not required in this study, because it will not collect the original data from individual patient. The results are expected to publish through a peer-reviewed journal. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019120501.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wei
- Second Ward of Orthopedis Department
| | | | - Yu-zhi Li
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Best Is the Enemy of Good (But What if Good Is Not Good Enough?). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019; 49:39-42. [PMID: 30704358 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2019.0602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly important in research and clinical practice and to monitoring the efficiency of health care services. The selection process of a PROM is fundamental to ensure that what matters to patients is captured in a valid, reliable, responsive, and feasible manner. However, selecting a fit-for-purpose PROM is not always an easy task, as many clinimetric and sociological factors can play a role. In this Viewpoint, 2 different perspectives on PROM selection are presented and debated, and a few key suggestions are provided to improve PROM development and assessment. The measurement of physical functioning in patients with low back pain (LBP) is used as a recurring example. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(2):39-42. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.0602.
Collapse
|
44
|
Ricciardi L, Sturiale CL, Pucci R, Reale G, Stifano V, Izzo A, Perna A, Proietti L, Forcato S, Rivera Perla KM, El Boustany S, Olivi A, Polli FM. Patient-Oriented Aesthetic Outcome After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A 1-Year Follow-Up Prospective Observational Study Comparing Minimally Invasive and Standard Open Procedures. World Neurosurg 2018; 122:e1041-e1046. [PMID: 30415051 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Revised: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recent treatment developments, back pain and related disabilities still represent a challenge for practitioners. Among the available surgical techniques, many different features and outcomes have been investigated; however, aesthetic result was missing among them. The present investigation was designed to prospectively compare patient-oriented aesthetic results after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and standard open surgery (SOS) for the lumbar spine. METHODS This was a prospective observational study with 1-year follow-up. Patients who underwent SOS were assigned to group 1 and MIS to group 2. Patient-oriented aesthetic result evaluation was collected using a dedicated visual aesthetic analogue scale. The Vancouver Scar Scale was used to exclude objective underlying influencing factors. The Oswestry Disability Index and a 10-point itemized visual analogue scale for back pain were administered to assess the clinical and functional status. Follow-up data were collected before discharge at 1, 6, and 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted, and P < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS We enrolled 74 patients, 44 in group 1 and 30 in group 2. The 2 groups were homogeneous for demographic and clinical data. No clinical or functional differences were measured at the end of follow-up. Visual aesthetic analogue scale reported greater mean values in group 1 at every follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS Patients seem to prefer the aesthetic result from a single midline incision after SOS compared with MIS. The use of specific techniques could be considered if there is scientific evidence reporting greater aesthetic outcome, having similar clinical and functional ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Ricciardi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Istituto di Neurochirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | | | - Resi Pucci
- Dipartimento di Scienze Odontostomatologiche e Maxillo Facciali, "Sapienza" Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Reale
- Dipartimento di Scienze Odontostomatologiche e Maxillo Facciali, "Sapienza" Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Vito Stifano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Istituto di Neurochirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Izzo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Istituto di Neurochirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Perna
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Istituto di Ortopedia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Proietti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Istituto di Ortopedia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Forcato
- Unità operativa di neurochirurgia, Pia Fondazione Panico, Ospedale di Tricase (LE), Italy
| | | | | | - Alessandro Olivi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Istituto di Neurochirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|