Contrast-Specific Imaging Without Contrast: An Echocardiographic Technique for the Detection of Myocardial Scar

Simultaneous measurements of myocardial glucose metabolism and extracellular volumes with hybrid PET/MRI using concurrent injections of Gd-DTPA and [18F]FDG

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to investigate the application of a constant infusion (CI) to mitigate the issue of constantly changing Gd-DTPA contrast levels in a bolus injection for extracellular volume (ECV) measurements by (a) comparing a CI alone to a bolus alone and a bolus followed by CI in healthy myocardium, (b) evaluating the impact of glucose suppression using heparin on ECV.

METHODS

Five healthy canine subjects were imaged to compare three different protocols for injecting Gd-DTPA and FDG: bolus alone, CI alone, bolus followed by CI. Suppression of myocardial glucose uptake was induced using a continuous infusion of 20% lipid at a rate of 0.25 mL·min-1·kg-1 as well as 2000 units of intravenous heparin injected 20 minutes prior to FDG/Gd-DTPA injection.

RESULTS

There was no significant effect on ECV measurement when heparin was used for glucose suppression at equilibrium irrespective of infusion protocol). Measurements of ECV in myocardium, regardless of infusion protocol showed no significant difference at all time points (P = 0.21) prior to washout.

CONCLUSIONS

The suppression of myocardial uptake of [18F]FDG with heparin did not alter the determination of myocardial ECV though a larger sample size may show differences. Further, the infusion protocol (bolus or constant infusion) had no effect on the calculated ECV.

Segmental strain for scar detection in acute myocardial infarcts and in follow-up exams using non-contrast CMR cine sequences

Background

The purpose of the study was to investigate feasibility of infarct detection in segmental strain derived from non-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine sequences in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and in follow-up (FU) exams.

Methods

57 patients with AMI (mean age 61 ± 12 years, CMR 2.8 ± 2 days after infarction) were retrospectively included, FU exams were available in 32 patients (35 ± 14 days after first CMR). 43 patients with normal CMR (54 ± 11 years) served as controls. Dedicated software (Segment CMR, Medviso) was used to calculate global and segmental strain derived from cine sequences. Cine short axis stacks and segmental circumferential strain calculations of every patient and control were presented to two blinded readers in random order, who were advised to identify potentially infarcted segments, blinded to LGE and clinical information.

Results

Impaired global strain was measured in AMI patients compared to controls (global peak circumferential strain [GPCS] p = 0.01; global peak longitudinal strain [GPLS] p = 0.04; global peak radial strain [GPRS] p = 0.01). In both imaging time points, mean segmental peak circumferential strain [SPCS] was impaired in infarcted tissue compared to remote segments (AMI: p = 0.03, FU: p = 0.02). SPCS values in infarcted segments were similar between AMI and FU (p = 0.8). In SPCS calculations, 141 from 189 acutely infarcted segments were accurately detected (74.6%), visual evaluation of correlating cine images detected 43.4% infarcts. In FU, 80% infarcted segments (91/114 segments) were detected in SPCS and 51.8% by visual evaluation of correlating short axis cine images (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Segmental circumferential strain derived from routinely acquired native cine sequences detects nearly 75% of acute infarcts and 80% of infarcts in subacute follow-up CMR, significantly more than visual evaluation of correlating cine images alone. Acute infarcts may display only subtle impairment of wall motion and no obvious wall thinning, thus SPCS calculation might be helpful for scar detection in patients with acute infarcts, when LGE images are not available.