1
|
Huang X, Li Y, Zheng H, Xu Y. Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Cardiol Rev 2024:00045415-990000000-00279. [PMID: 38814094 DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) poses a significant clinical challenge, with sudden cardiac death (SCD) emerging as one of the leading causes of mortality. Despite advancements in cardiovascular medicine, predicting and preventing SCD in HFpEF remains complex due to multifactorial pathophysiological mechanisms and patient heterogeneity. Unlike heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, where impaired contractility and ventricular remodeling predominate, HFpEF pathophysiology involves heavy burden of comorbidities such as hypertension, obesity, and diabetes. Diverse mechanisms, including diastolic dysfunction, microvascular abnormalities, and inflammation, also contribute to distinct disease and SCD risk profiles. Various parameters such as clinical factors and electrocardiogram features have been proposed in SCD risk assessment. Advanced imaging modalities and biomarkers offer promise in risk prediction, yet comprehensive risk stratification models specific to HFpEF ar0e lacking. This review offers recent evidence on SCD risk factors and discusses current therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing SCD risk in HFpEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Huang
- From the Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kan A, Leng Y, Li S, Lin F, Fang Q, Tao X, Hu M, Gong L. The predictive value of coronary microvascular dysfunction for left ventricular reverse remodelling in dilated cardiomyopathy. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1301509. [PMID: 38111885 PMCID: PMC10726051 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1301509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims To evaluate the degree of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) first-pass perfusion parameters and to examine the correlation between myocardial perfusion and left ventricle reverse remodelling (LVRR). Methods In this study, 94 DCM patients and 35 healthy controls matched for age and sex were included. Myocardial perfusion parameters, including upslope, time to maximum signal intensity (Timemax), maximum signal intensity (SImax), baseline signal intensity (SIbaseline), and the difference between maximum and baseline signal intensity (SImax-baseline) were measured. Additionally, left ventricular (LV) structure, function parameters, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were also recorded. The parameters were compared between healthy controls and DCM patients. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of LVRR. Results With a median follow-up period of 12 months [interquartile range (IQR), 8-13], 41 DCM patients (44%) achieved LVRR. Compared with healthy controls, DCM patients presented CMD with reduced upslope, SIbaseline, and increased Timemax (all p < 0.01). Timemax, SImax, and SImax-baseline were further decreased in LVRR than non-LVRR group (Timemax: 60.35 [IQR, 51.46-74.71] vs. 72.41 [IQR, 59.68-97.70], p = 0.017; SImax: 723.52 [IQR, 209.76-909.27] vs. 810.92 [IQR, 581.30-996.89], p = 0.049; SImax-baseline: 462.99 [IQR, 152.25-580.43] vs. 551.13 [IQR, 402.57-675.36], p = 0.038). In the analysis of multivariate logistic regression, Timemax [odds ratio (OR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-1.00; p = 0.032)], heart rate (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.08; p = 0.029), LV remodelling index (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.06-3.00; p = 0.038) and LGE extent (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.96; p = 0.021) were independent predictors of LVRR. Conclusions CMD could be found in DCM patients and was more impaired in patients with non-LVRR than LVRR patients. Timemax at baseline was an independent predictor of LVRR in DCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ao Kan
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yinping Leng
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Shuhao Li
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Fang Lin
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Qimin Fang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Xinwei Tao
- Department of Medical, Bayer Healthcare, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengyao Hu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Lianggeng Gong
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weiner J, Heinisch C, Oeri S, Kujawski T, Szucs-Farkas Z, Zbinden R, Guensch DP, Fischer K. Focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis both contribute to regional hypoperfusion assessed by post-processing quantitative-perfusion MRI techniques. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1260156. [PMID: 37795480 PMCID: PMC10546174 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1260156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Indications for stress-cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to assess myocardial ischemia and viability are growing. First pass perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) have limited value in balanced ischemia and diffuse fibrosis. Quantitative perfusion (QP) to assess absolute pixelwise myocardial blood flow (MBF) and extracellular volume (ECV) as a measure of diffuse fibrosis can overcome these limitations. We investigated the use of post-processing techniques for quantifying both pixelwise MBF and diffuse fibrosis in patients with clinically indicated CMR stress exams. We then assessed if focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis and other features quantified during the CMR exam explain individual MBF findings. Methods This prospective observational study enrolled 125 patients undergoing a clinically indicated stress-CMR scan. In addition to the clinical report, MBF during regadenoson-stress was quantified using a post-processing QP method and T1 maps were used to calculate ECV. Factors that were associated with poor MBF were investigated. Results Of the 109 patients included (66 ± 11 years, 32% female), global and regional perfusion was quantified by QP analysis in both the presence and absence of visual first pass perfusion deficits. Similarly, ECV analysis identified diffuse fibrosis in myocardium beyond segments with LGE. Multivariable analysis showed both LGE (β = -0.191, p = 0.001) and ECV (β = -0.011, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of reduced MBF. In patients without clinically defined first pass perfusion deficits, the microvascular risk-factors of age and wall thickness further contributed to poor MBF (p < 0.001). Discussion Quantitative analysis of MBF and diffuse fibrosis detected regional tissue abnormalities not identified by traditional visual assessment. Multi-parametric quantitative analysis may refine the work-up of the etiology of myocardial ischemia in patients referred for clinical CMR stress testing in the future and provide a deeper insight into ischemic heart disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Weiner
- Cardiology, Hospital Centre of Biel, Biel, Switzerland
| | | | - Salome Oeri
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Zsolt Szucs-Farkas
- Radiology, Hospital Centre of Biel, Biel, Switzerland
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Paediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Dominik P. Guensch
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Paediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kady Fischer
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou W, Sin J, Yan AT, Wang H, Lu J, Li Y, Kim P, Patel AR, Ng MY. Qualitative and Quantitative Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Clinical Practice: A Comprehensive Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13030524. [PMID: 36766629 PMCID: PMC9914769 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a well-validated non-invasive stress test to diagnose significant coronary artery disease (CAD), with higher diagnostic accuracy than other common functional imaging modalities. One-stop assessment of myocardial ischemia, cardiac function, and myocardial viability qualitatively and quantitatively has been proven to be a cost-effective method in clinical practice for CAD evaluation. Beyond diagnosis, stress CMR also provides prognostic information and guides coronary revascularisation. In addition to CAD, there is a large body of literature demonstrating CMR's diagnostic performance and prognostic value in other common cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), especially coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). This review focuses on the clinical applications of stress CMR, including stress CMR scanning methods, practical interpretation of stress CMR images, and clinical utility of stress CMR in a setting of CVDs with possible myocardial ischemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenli Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai 200233, China
| | - Jason Sin
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Andrew T. Yan
- St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
| | | | - Jing Lu
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai 200233, China
| | - Yuehua Li
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai 200233, China
| | - Paul Kim
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Amit R. Patel
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Ming-Yen Ng
- Department of Medical Imaging, HKU-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518009, China
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pica S, Di Odoardo L, Testa L, Bollati M, Crimi G, Camporeale A, Tondi L, Pontone G, Guglielmo M, Andreini D, Squeri A, Monti L, Roccasalva F, Grancini L, Gasparini GL, Secco GG, Bellini B, Azzalini L, Maestroni A, Bedogni F, Lombardi M. Collateral presence and extent do not predict myocardial viability and ischemia in chronic total occlusions: A stress-CMR study. Int J Cardiol 2023; 371:10-15. [PMID: 36181950 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Well-developed collaterals are assumed as a marker of viability and ischemia in chronic total occlusions (CTO). We aim to correlate viability and ischemia with collateral presence and extent in CTO patients by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS Multicentre study of 150 CTO patients undergoing stress-CMR, including adenosine if normal systolic function, high-dose-dobutamine for patients with akinetic/>2 hypokinetic segments and EF ≥35%, otherwise low-dose-dobutamine (LDD); all patients underwent late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. Viability was defined as mean LGE transmurality ≤50% for adenosine, as functional improvement for dobutamine-stress-test, ischemia as ≥1.5 segments with perfusion defects outside the scar zone. RESULTS Rentrop 3/CC 2 defined well-developed (WD, n = 74) vs poorly-developed collaterals (PD, n = 76). Viability was equally prevalent in WD vs PD: normo-functional myocardium with ≤50% LGE in 52% vs 58% segments, p = 0.76, functional improvement by LDD in 48% vs 52%, p = 0.12. Segments with none, 1-25%,26-50%,51-75% LGE showed viability by LDD in 90%,84%,81%,61% of cases, whilst in 12% if 76-100% LGE (p < 0.01). There was no difference in WD vs PD for ischemia presence (74% vs 75%, p = 0.99) and extent (2.7 vs 2.8 segments, p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS In a large cohort of CTO patients, presence and extent of collaterals did not predict viability and ischemia by stress-CMR. Scar extent up to 75% LGE was still associated with viability, whereas ischemia was undetectable in 25% of patients, suggesting that the assessment of CTO patients with CMR would lead to a more comprehensive evaluation of viability and ischemia to guide revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Pica
- Multimodality Cardiac Imaging Section, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
| | - L Di Odoardo
- Multimodality Cardiac Imaging Section, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - L Testa
- Cardiology Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - M Bollati
- Cardiology Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - G Crimi
- Interventional Cardiology, Cardio Thoraco-Vascular-Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - A Camporeale
- Multimodality Cardiac Imaging Section, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - L Tondi
- Multimodality Cardiac Imaging Section, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - G Pontone
- Cardiology Department, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M Guglielmo
- Cardiology Department, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - D Andreini
- Cardiology Department, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Squeri
- Cardiology Department, Villa Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy
| | - L Monti
- Cardiology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - F Roccasalva
- Cardiology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - L Grancini
- Cardiology Department, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - G L Gasparini
- Cardiology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G G Secco
- Interventional Cardiology Department, A.O.Ss. Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria, Italy
| | - B Bellini
- Interventional Cardiology Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - L Azzalini
- Division of Cardiology, VCU Health Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - A Maestroni
- Cardiology Department, ASST Valle Olona, Busto Arsizio, Varese, Italy
| | - F Bedogni
- Cardiology Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - M Lombardi
- Multimodality Cardiac Imaging Section, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Henningsson M, Carlhäll CJ, Ebbers T, Kihlberg J. Non-contrast myocardial perfusion in rest and exercise stress using systolic flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 35:711-718. [PMID: 34958438 PMCID: PMC9463284 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-021-00992-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate systolic flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) during rest and exercise stress using 2RR (two cardiac cycles) or 1RR intervals between inversion pulse and imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS 1RR and 2RR FAIR was implemented on a 3T scanner. Ten healthy subjects were scanned during rest and stress. Stress was performed using an in-bore ergometer. Heart rate, mean myocardial blood flow (MBF) and temporal signal-to-noise ratio (TSNR) were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS Mean heart rate during stress was higher than rest for 1RR FAIR (85.8 ± 13.7 bpm vs 63.3 ± 11.1 bpm; p < 0.01) and 2RR FAIR (83.8 ± 14.2 bpm vs 63.1 ± 10.6 bpm; p < 0.01). Mean stress MBF was higher than rest for 1RR FAIR (2.97 ± 0.76 ml/g/min vs 1.43 ± 0.6 ml/g/min; p < 0.01) and 2RR FAIR (2.8 ± 0.96 ml/g/min vs 1.22 ± 0.59 ml/g/min; p < 0.01). Resting mean MBF was higher for 1RR FAIR than 2RR FAIR (p < 0.05), but not during stress. TSNR was lower for stress compared to rest for 1RR FAIR (4.52 ± 2.54 vs 10.12 ± 3.69; p < 0.01) and 2RR FAIR (7.36 ± 3.78 vs 12.41 ± 5.12; p < 0.01). 2RR FAIR TSNR was higher than 1RR FAIR for rest (p < 0.05) and stress (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION We have demonstrated feasibility of systolic FAIR in rest and exercise stress. 2RR delay systolic FAIR enables non-contrast perfusion assessment during stress with relatively high TSNR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Henningsson
- Unit of Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Carl-Johan Carlhäll
- Unit of Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Physiology in Linköping, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Tino Ebbers
- Unit of Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Johan Kihlberg
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rumbinaite E, Karuzas A, Verikas D, Jonauskiene I, Gustiene O, Mamedov A, Jankauskiene L, Benetis R, Zaliunas R, Vaskelyte JJ. Value of myocardial deformation parameters for detecting significant coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2022; 14:180-190. [PMID: 36398054 PMCID: PMC9617060 DOI: 10.34172/jcvtr.2022.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of global and regional myocardial deformation parameters derived from two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography to detect functionally significant coronary artery stenosis.
Methods: Dobutamine stress echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI) were performed on 145 patients with a moderate and high probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) and LVEF≥55%. Significant CAD was defined as>50% stenosis of the left main stem,>70% stenosis in a major coronary vessel, or in the presence of intermediate stenosis (50-69%) validated as hemodynamically significant by CMRMPI. Patients were divided in two groups: non-pathological (48.3%) vs pathological (51.7%), according to CAG and CMR-MPI results. Afterwards, off-line speckle-tracking analysis was performed to analyse myocardial deformation parameters. Results: There were no differences in myocardial deformation parameters at rest between groups, except global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global radial strain (GRS) were significantly lower in the CAD (+) group: -21.3±2.2 vs.-16.3±2.3 (P<0.001) and 39.7±23.2 vs. 24.5±15.8 (P<0.001). GLS and regional longitudinal strain rate (SR) had the highest diagnostic value at high dobutamine dose with AUC of 0.902 and 0.878, respectively. At early recovery, GLS was also found to be the best myocardial deformation parameter with a sensitivity of 78%, specificity 67%, AUC 0.824. Conclusion: Global and regional myocardial deformation parameters are highly sensitive and specific in detecting functionally significant CAD. The combination of deformation parameters and WMA provides an incremental diagnostic value for patients with a moderate and high probability of CAD, especially the combination with regional longitudinal SR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Egle Rumbinaite
- Department of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Arnas Karuzas
- Department of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Dovydas Verikas
- Department of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Ieva Jonauskiene
- Department of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Olivija Gustiene
- Department of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Arslan Mamedov
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Loreta Jankauskiene
- Department of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Rimantas Benetis
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Remigijus Zaliunas
- Department of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Jolanta Justina Vaskelyte
- Department of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Edvardsen T, Asch FM, Davidson B, Delgado V, DeMaria A, Dilsizian V, Gaemperli O, Garcia MJ, Kamp O, Lee DC, Neglia D, Neskovic AN, Pellikka PA, Plein S, Sechtem U, Shea E, Sicari R, Villines TC, Lindner JR, Popescu BA. Non-Invasive Imaging in Coronary Syndromes: Recommendations of The European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, in Collaboration with The American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2022; 16:362-383. [PMID: 35729014 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thor Edvardsen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Federico M Asch
- MedStar Health Research Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Brian Davidson
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | - Victoria Delgado
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vasken Dilsizian
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Mario J Garcia
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Bronx, New York
| | - Otto Kamp
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel C Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Danilo Neglia
- Department of Cardiology, Istituto di Scienze della Vita Scuola Superiore Sant Anna Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Aleksandar N Neskovic
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Clinical Hospital Center Zemun, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Patricia A Pellikka
- Division of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sven Plein
- Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Udo Sechtem
- Cardiologicum Stuttgart and Department of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Elaine Shea
- Alta Bates Summit Medical Center, Berkeley and Oakland, Berkeley, California
| | - Rosa Sicari
- CNR, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
| | - Todd C Villines
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, University of Virginia Health Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jonathan R Lindner
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Bogdan A Popescu
- Department of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila Euroecolab, Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Prof. Dr. C. C. Iliescu, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rafiee MJ, Khaki M, Haririsanati L, Fard FB, Chetrit M, Friedrich MG. MRI findings of epipericardial fat necrosis: As a rare cause of acute chest pain in a healthy man. Radiol Case Rep 2022; 17:2488-2491. [PMID: 35586161 PMCID: PMC9108741 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Epipericardial fat necrosis (EPFN) is a rare, benign cause of acute chest pain imitating symptoms of life-threatening diseases, such as acute coronary syndrome. Here We report a 37-year-old, healthy male presented to the emergency department (ED) with sudden-onset pleuritic chest pain after an isometric physical training. Initial cardiac workup included ECG, echocardiography was unremarkable, but diagnosis of an inflammatory process that involved the epipericardial fat tissue surrounding the heart was made by showing encapsulated fatty lesion, enhanced adjacent parietal pericardium using of contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Magnetic resonance imaging would help physicians to differentiate EPFN from severe and life-treating conditions.
Collapse
|
10
|
Edvardsen T, Asch FM, Davidson B, Delgado V, DeMaria A, Dilsizian V, Gaemperli O, Garcia MJ, Kamp O, Lee DC, Neglia D, Neskovic AN, Pellikka PA, Plein S, Sechtem U, Shea E, Sicari R, Villines TC, Lindner JR, Popescu BA. Non-Invasive Imaging in Coronary Syndromes: Recommendations of The European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, in Collaboration with The American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2022; 35:329-354. [PMID: 35379446 DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thor Edvardsen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Federico M Asch
- MedStar Health Research Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Brian Davidson
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | - Victoria Delgado
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vasken Dilsizian
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Mario J Garcia
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Bronx, New York
| | - Otto Kamp
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel C Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Danilo Neglia
- Department of Cardiology, Istituto di Scienze della Vita Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna - Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Aleksandar N Neskovic
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Clinical Hospital Center Zemun, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Patricia A Pellikka
- Division of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sven Plein
- Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Udo Sechtem
- Cardiologicum Stuttgart and Department of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Elaine Shea
- Alta Bates Summit Medical Center, Berkeley and Oakland, Berkeley, California
| | - Rosa Sicari
- CNR, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
| | - Todd C Villines
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, University of Virginia Health Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jonathan R Lindner
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Bogdan A Popescu
- Department of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila"-Euroecolab, Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Prof. Dr. C. C. Iliescu", Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Han PL, Li XM, Jiang L, Yan WF, Guo YK, Li Y, Li K, Yang ZG. Additive Effects of Obesity on Myocardial Microcirculation and Left Ventricular Deformation in Essential Hypertension: A Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:831231. [PMID: 35402539 PMCID: PMC8987987 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.831231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The combination of hypertension and obesity is a major cause of cardiovascular risk, and microvascular changes and subclinical dysfunction should be considered to illustrate the underlying mechanisms and early identification, thereby developing targeted therapies. This study aims to explore the effect of obesity on myocardial microcirculation and left ventricular (LV) deformation in hypertensive patients by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods This study comprised 101 hypertensive patients, including 54 subjects with a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 and 47 subjects with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2, as well as 55 age- and sex-matched controls with a BMI of 18.5–24.9 kg/m2. Myocardial perfusion indicators [upslope, time to maximum signal intensity (TTM), maximum signal intensity (Max SI)] and LV strains [radial, circumferential, and longitudinal global peak strain (PS), peak systolic strain rate (PSSR), and peak diastolic strain rate (PDSR)] were measured. Results Upslope was numerically increased in obese patients but statistically decreased in non-obese patients compared with controls. Longitudinal PS deteriorated significantly and gradually from controls to non-obese and obese hypertensive patients. Longitudinal PSSR and PDSR were significantly decreased in obese hypertensive patients compared with the other two groups. BMI was associated with upslope (β = −0.136, P < 0.001), Max SI (β = −0.922, P < 0.001), longitudinal PSSR (β = 0.018, P < 0.001), and PDSR (β = −0.024, P = 0.001). Myocardial perfusion was independently associated with longitudinal PSSR (TTM: β = 0.003, P = 0.017) and longitudinal PDSR (upslope: β = 0.067, P = 0.020) in hypertension. Conclusion Obesity had adverse effects on microvascular changes and subclinical LV dysfunction in hypertension, and BMI was independently associated with both myocardial perfusion and LV deformation. Impaired myocardial perfusion was independently associated with subclinical LV dysfunction in hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Lun Han
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xue-Ming Li
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Li Jiang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei-Feng Yan
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ying-Kun Guo
- Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuan Li
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Kang Li
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- *Correspondence: Kang Li,
| | - Zhi-Gang Yang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Zhi-Gang Yang,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Long-Standing Non-Infarcted Chronic Coronary Syndrome with Preserved Systolic Function. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12040786. [PMID: 35453834 PMCID: PMC9031407 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The impact of imaging-derived ischemia is still under debate and the role of stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (spCMR) in non-high-risk patient still needs to be clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of spCMR in a case series of stable long-standing chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients with ischemia and no other risk factor. (2) Methods: This is a historical prospective study including 35 patients with history of long-standing CCS who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and additional adenosine spCMR. Clinical and imaging findings were included in the analysis. Primary outcomes were HF (heart failure) and all major cardiac events (MACE) including death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. (3) Results: Mean follow-up was 3.7 years (IQR: from 1 to 6). Mean ejection fraction was 61 ± 8%. Twelve patients (31%) referred primary outcomes. Probability of experiencing primary outcomes based on symptoms was 62% and increased to 67% and 91% when multivessel disease and ischemia, respectively, were considered. Higher ischemic burden was predictive of disease progression (OR: 1.59, 95%CI: 1.18–2.14; p-value = 0.002). spCMR model resulted non inferior to the model comprising all variables (4) Conclusions: In vivo spCMR-modeling including perfusion and strain anomalies could represent a powerful tool in long-standing CCS, even when conventional imaging predictors are missing.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sakuma H, Ishida M. Advances in Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging: Physiological Implications, the Importance of Quantitative Analysis, and Impact on Patient Care in Coronary Artery Disease. Magn Reson Med Sci 2022; 21:195-211. [PMID: 34108304 PMCID: PMC9199984 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is the preferred test in patients with intermediate-to-high clinical likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) and can be used as a gatekeeper to avoid unnecessary revascularization. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has a number of favorable characteristics, including: (1) high spatial resolution that can delineate subendocardial ischemia; (2) comprehensive assessment of morphology, global and regional cardiac functions, tissue characterization, and coronary artery stenosis; and (3) no radiation exposure to patients. According to meta-analysis studies, the diagnostic accuracy of perfusion CMR is comparable to positron emission tomography (PET) and perfusion CT, and is better than single-photon emission CT (SPECT) when fractional flow reserve (FFR) is used as a reference standard. In addition, stress CMR has an excellent prognostic value. One meta-analysis study demonstrated the annual event rate of cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction was 4.9% and 0.8%, respectively, in patients with positive and negative stress CMR. Quantitative assessment of perfusion CMR not only allows the objective evaluation of regional ischemia but also provides insights into the pathophysiology of microvascular disease and diffuse subclinical atherosclerosis. For accurate quantification of myocardial perfusion, saturation correction of arterial input function is important. There are two major approaches for saturation correction, one is a dual-bolus method and the other is a dual-sequence method. Absolute quantitative mapping with myocardial perfusion CMR has good accuracy in detecting coronary microvascular dysfunction. Flow measurement in the coronary sinus (CS) with phase contrast cine CMR is an alternative approach to quantify global coronary flow reserve (CFR). The measurement of global CFR by quantitative analysis of perfusion CMR or flow measurement in the CS permits assessment of microvascular disease and diffuse subclinical atherosclerosis, which may provide improved prediction of future event risk in patients with suspected or known CAD. Multi-institutional studies to validate the diagnostic and prognostic values of quantitative perfusion CMR approaches are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajime Sakuma
- Department of Radiology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - Masaki Ishida
- Department of Radiology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Torlasco C, Castelletti S, Soranna D, Volpato V, Figliozzi S, Menacho K, Cernigliaro F, Zambon A, Kellman P, Moon JC, Badano LP, Parati G. Effective Study: Development and Application of a Question-Driven, Time-Effective Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Scanning Protocol. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 11:e022605. [PMID: 34970923 PMCID: PMC9075206 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.022605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Long scanning times impede cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) clinical uptake. A “one‐size‐fits‐all” shortened, focused protocol (eg, only function and late‐gadolinium enhancement) reduces scanning time and costs, but provides less information. We developed 2 question‐driven CMR and stress‐CMR protocols, including tailored advanced tissue characterization, and tested their effectiveness in reducing scanning time while retaining the diagnostic performances of standard protocols. Methods and Results Eighty three consecutive patients with cardiomyopathy or ischemic heart disease underwent the tailored CMR. Each scan consisted of standard cines, late‐gadolinium enhancement imaging, native T1‐mapping, and extracellular volume. Fat/edema modules, right ventricle cine, and in‐line quantitative perfusion mapping were performed as clinically required. Workflow was optimized to avoid gaps. Time target was <30 minutes for a CMR and <35 minutes for a stress‐CMR. CMR was considered impactful when its results drove changes in diagnosis or management. Advanced tissue characterization was considered impactful when it changed the confidence level in the diagnosis. The quality of the images was assessed. A control group of 137 patients was identified among scans performed before February 2020. Compared with standard protocols, the average scan duration dropped by >30% (CMR: from 42±8 to 28±6 minutes; stress‐CMR: from 50±10 to 34±6 minutes, both P<0.0001). Independent on the protocol, CMR was impactful in ≈60% cases, and advanced tissue characterization was impactful in >45% of cases. Quality grading was similar between the 2 protocols. Tailored protocols did not require additional staff. Conclusions Tailored CMR and stress‐CMR protocols including advanced tissue characterization are accurate and time‐effective for cardiomyopathies and ischemic heart disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Torlasco
- Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy
| | | | - Davide Soranna
- Biostatistics Unit IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy
| | - Valentina Volpato
- Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Milano-Bicocca Milan Italy
| | - Stefano Figliozzi
- Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy
| | - Katia Menacho
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science University College London London UK.,Barts Heart Centre St Bartholomew's Hospital London UK
| | - Franco Cernigliaro
- Radiodiagnostic Department IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy
| | - Antonella Zambon
- Biostatistics Unit IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy.,Department of Statistics and Quantitative Method University of Milano-Bicocca Milan Italy
| | - Peter Kellman
- National Heart, Lung and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health Bethesda MD
| | - James C Moon
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science University College London London UK.,Barts Heart Centre St Bartholomew's Hospital London UK
| | - Luigi P Badano
- Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Milano-Bicocca Milan Italy
| | - Gianfranco Parati
- Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Milano-Bicocca Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Edvardsen T, Asch FM, Davidson B, Delgado V, DeMaria A, Dilsizian V, Gaemperli O, Garcia MJ, Kamp O, Lee DC, Neglia D, Neskovic AN, Pellikka PA, Plein S, Sechtem U, Shea E, Sicari R, Villines TC, Lindner JR, Popescu BA. Non-invasive Imaging in Coronary Syndromes - Recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, in Collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 23:e6-e33. [PMID: 34751391 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide, with a high socioeconomic impact.(1) Non-invasive imaging modalities play a fundamental role in the evaluation and management of patients with known or suspected CAD. Imaging end-points have served as surrogate markers in many observational studies and randomized clinical trials that evaluated the benefits of specific therapies for CAD.(2) A number of guidelines and recommendations have been published about coronary syndromes by cardiology societies and associations, but have not focused on the excellent opportunities with cardiac imaging. The recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2019 guideline on chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and 2020 guideline on acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) highlight the importance of non-invasive imaging in the diagnosis, treatment, and risk assessment of the disease.(3)(4) The purpose of the current recommendations is to present the significant role of non-invasive imaging in coronary syndromes in more detail. These recommendations have been developed by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE), in collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, all of which have approved the final document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thor Edvardsen
- Dept of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo Norway, and University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Federico M Asch
- MedStar Health Research Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, . USA
| | - Brian Davidson
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University; VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Victoria Delgado
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Vasken Dilsizian
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - Mario J Garcia
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, New York, 10467, USA
| | - Otto Kamp
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel C Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Danilo Neglia
- Department of Cardiology, Fondazione Toscana G. Monastrerio, Pisa, Italy
| | - Aleksandar N Neskovic
- Dept of Cardiology, Clinical Hospital Zemun, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Patricia A Pellikka
- Division of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sven Plein
- Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Udo Sechtem
- Cardiologicum Stuttgart and Department of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Elaine Shea
- Alta Bates Summit Medical Center, Berkeley and Oakland, California, ., USA
| | - Rosa Sicari
- CNR, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa and Milan, Italy
| | - Todd C Villines
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jonathan R Lindner
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute and Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Bogdan A Popescu
- Department of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila" - Euroecolab, Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Prof. Dr. C. C. Iliescu", Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dong S, Liu Y, Sun W, Wang C, Wang Y, Zhao W, Zhao S, Chu Y. Analysis of Characteristics of Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e933220. [PMID: 34667142 PMCID: PMC8544020 DOI: 10.12659/msm.933220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to investigate the characteristics of patients who have total coronary occlusion but manifest with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and we assessed the extent of infarct transmurality and myocardial necrosis size in NSTEMI patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled all patients diagnosed at our hospital with subtotal or total occlusion of the culprit artery (TOCA), based on the coronary angiography, who successfully underwent PCI within 12 h of admission, and who had CMR imaging performed within 2 days after the PCI. RESULTS Based on 12-lead ECG findings, 48% of patients were categorized as having STEMI and 52% as having NSTEMI. TOCA was detected by coronary angiography in 43% of NSTEMI patients, and in 60% and 33% of normal ST segment and ST-segment depression MI patients, respectively. The transmural segments were found in 78% of STEMI patients and 31% of NSTEMI patients (P<0.05). Transmural infarction segments were found in 64% of NSTEMI patients with TOCA and in 8% of NTOCA patients (P<0.05). Moreover, the number of transmural segments in ST-segment depression MI patients was the lowest (P<0.05). Infarct size in STEMI patients was significantly larger than in patients with NSTEMI (P<0.05), whereas there was no statistically significant difference in patients with normal ST segment and ST-segment depression MI patients (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Identification TOCA by coronary angiography and transmural infarction by DE-MRI can be challenging in AMI patients with non-ST-segment elevation. In approximately 30% of non-ST-segment elevation MI patients, transmural infarction was detected by DE-MRI. Therefore, TOCA accompanied by transmural infarction in non-ST-segment-elevation MI patients is not uncommon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shujuan Dong
- Department of Cardiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland)
| | - Yunbo Liu
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland)
| | - Wenjing Sun
- Department of Cardiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland)
| | - Chunqiu Wang
- Department of Radiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland)
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Radiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland)
| | - Wenbo Zhao
- Department of Cardiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland)
| | - Shenghui Zhao
- Department of Cardiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland)
| | - Yingjie Chu
- Department of Cardiology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China (mainland)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is one of the most common causes of congestive heart failure. In patients with ICM, tissue characterization with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) allows for evaluation of myocardial abnormalities in acute and chronic settings. Myocardial edema, microvascular obstruction (MVO), intracardiac thrombus, intramyocardial hemorrhage, and late gadolinium enhancement of the myocardium are easily depicted using standard CMR sequences. In the acute setting, tissue characterization is mainly focused on assessment of ventricular thrombus and MVO, which are associated with poor prognosis. Conversely, in chronic ICM, it is important to depict late gadolinium enhancement and myocardial ischemia using stress perfusion sequences. Overall, with CMR's ability to accurately characterize myocardial tissue in acute and chronic ICM, it represents a valuable diagnostic and prognostic imaging method for treatment planning. In particular, tissue characterization abnormalities in the acute setting can provide information regarding the patients that may develop major adverse cardiac event and show the presence of ventricular thrombus; in the chronic setting, evaluation of viable myocardium can be fundamental for planning myocardial revascularization. In this review, the main findings on tissue characterization are illustrated in acute and chronic settings using qualitative and quantitative tissue characterization.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ochs MM, Kajzar I, Salatzki J, Ochs AT, Riffel J, Osman N, Katus HA, Friedrich MG. Hyperventilation/Breath-Hold Maneuver to Detect Myocardial Ischemia by Strain-Encoded CMR: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Needle-Free Stress Protocol. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 14:1932-1944. [PMID: 33865775 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a fast, needle-free test for myocardial ischemia using fast Strain-ENCoded (fSENC) cardiovascular MR (CMR) after a hyperventilation/breath-hold maneuver (HVBH). BACKGROUND Myocardial stress testing is one of the most frequent diagnostic tests performed. Recent data indicate that CMR first-pass perfusion outperforms other modalities. Its use, however, is limited by the need for both, a vasodilatory stress and the intravenous application of gadolinium. Both are associated with added cost, safety concerns, and patient inconvenience. The combination of 2 novel CMR approaches, fSENC, an ultrafast technique to visualize myocardial strain, and HVBH, a physiological vasodilator, may overcome these limitations. METHODS Patients referred for CMR stress testing underwent an extended protocol to evaluate 3 different tests: 1) adenosine-perfusion; 2) adenosine-strain; and 3) HVBH-strain. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using quantitative coronary angiography as reference. RESULTS A total of 122 patients (age 66 ± 11years; 80% men) suspected of obstructive coronary artery disease were enrolled. All participants completed the protocol without significant adverse events. Adenosine-strain and HVBH-strain provided significantly better diagnostic accuracy than adenosine-perfusion, both on a patient level (adenosine-strain: sensitivity 82%, specificity 83%; HVBH-strain: sensitivity 81%, specificity 86% vs. adenosine-perfusion: sensitivity 67%, specificity 92%; p < 0.05) and territory level (adenosine-strain: sensitivity 67%, specificity 93%; HVBH-strain: sensitivity 63%, specificity 95% vs. adenosine-perfusion: sensitivity 49%, specificity 96%; p < 0.05). However, these differences in diagnostic accuracy disappear by excluding patients with history of coronary artery bypass graft or previous myocardial infarction. The response of longitudinal strain differs significantly between ischemic and nonischemic segments to adenosine (ΔLSischemic = 0.6 ± 5.4%, ΔLSnonischemic = -0.9 ± 2.7%; p < 0.05) and HVBH (ΔLSischemic = 1.3% ± 3.8%, ΔLSnonischemic = -0.3 ± 1.8%; p = 0.002). Test duration of HVBH-strain (t = 64 ± 2 s) was significantly shorter compared with adenosine-strain (t = 184 ± 59 s; p < 0.0001) and adenosine-perfusion (t = adenosine-perfusion: 172 ± 59 s; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS HVBH-strain has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting significant coronary artery stenosis. It is not only significantly faster than any other method but also neither requires contrast agents nor pharmacological stressors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco M Ochs
- Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Isabelle Kajzar
- Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Janek Salatzki
- Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas T Ochs
- Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Riffel
- Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nael Osman
- MyocardialSolutions, Morrisville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hugo A Katus
- Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias G Friedrich
- Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Medicine and Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sanghvi SK, Schwarzman LS, Nazir NT. Cardiac MRI and Myocardial Injury in COVID-19: Diagnosis, Risk Stratification and Prognosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:130. [PMID: 33467705 PMCID: PMC7830889 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11010130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Myocardial injury is a common complication of the COVID-19 illness and is associated with a worsened prognosis. Systemic hyperinflammation seen in the advanced stage of COVID-19 likely contributes to myocardial injury. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the preferred imaging modality for non-invasive evaluation in acute myocarditis, enabling risk stratification and prognostication. Modified scanning protocols in the pandemic setting reduce risk of exposure while providing critical data regarding cardiac tissue inflammation and fibrosis, chamber remodeling, and contractile function. The growing use of CMR in clinical practice to assess myocardial injury will improve understanding of the acute and chronic sequelae of myocardial inflammation from various pathological etiologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saagar K. Sanghvi
- Division of Cardiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Logan S. Schwarzman
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Noreen T. Nazir
- Division of Cardiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Donal E, Delgado V, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Galli E, Haugaa KH, Charron P, Voigt JU, Cardim N, Masci PG, Galderisi M, Gaemperli O, Gimelli A, Pinto YM, Lancellotti P, Habib G, Elliott P, Edvardsen T, Cosyns B, Popescu BA. Multimodality imaging in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of patients with dilated cardiomyopathies: an expert consensus document from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 20:1075-1093. [PMID: 31504368 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is defined by the presence of left ventricular or biventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction in the absence of abnormal loading conditions or coronary artery disease sufficient to explain these changes. This is a heterogeneous disease frequently having a genetic background. Imaging is important for the diagnosis, the prognostic assessment and for guiding therapy. A multimodality imaging approach provides a comprehensive evaluation of all the issues related to this disease. The present document aims to provide recommendations for the use of multimodality imaging according to the clinical question. Selection of one or another imaging technique should be based on the clinical condition and context. Techniques are presented with the aim to underscore what is 'clinically relevant' and what are the tools that 'can be used'. There remain some gaps in evidence on the impact of multimodality imaging on the management and the treatment of DCM patients where ongoing research is important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erwan Donal
- Service de Cardiologie et CIC-IT INSERM 1414, CHU Pontchaillou, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, Rennes, France.,LTSI, Université de Rennes 1, INSERM, UMR, Rennes, France
| | - Victoria Delgado
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden RC, The Netherlands
| | - Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci
- Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Malborough St, Bristol, UK
| | - Elena Galli
- Service de Cardiologie et CIC-IT INSERM 1414, CHU Pontchaillou, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, Rennes, France.,LTSI, Université de Rennes 1, INSERM, UMR, Rennes, France
| | - Kristina H Haugaa
- Department of Cardiology, Center for Cardiological Innovation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, Oslo, Norway
| | - Philippe Charron
- Centre de Référence pour les Maladies Cardiaques Héréditaires, APHP, ICAN, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Université Versailles Saint Quentin & AP-HP, CESP, INSERM U1018, Service de Génétique, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Jens-Uwe Voigt
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nuno Cardim
- Cardiology Department, Hospital da Luz, Av. Lusíada, n° 100, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - P G Masci
- HeartClinic, Hirslanden Hospital Zurich, Witellikerstrasse 32, CH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maurizio Galderisi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Oliver Gaemperli
- HeartClinic, Hirslanden Hospital Zurich, Witellikerstrasse 32, CH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Gimelli
- Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Via Moruzzi, 1, Pisa, Italy
| | - Yigal M Pinto
- Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrizio Lancellotti
- Department of Cardiology, University of Liège Hospital, Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman, B Liège, Belgium
| | - Gilbert Habib
- Cardiology Department, APHM, La Timone Hospital, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille University, IRD, APHM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France
| | - Perry Elliott
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.,Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Thor Edvardsen
- Department of Cardiology, Center for Cardiological Innovation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bernard Cosyns
- Centrum voor Hart en Vaatziekten (CHVZ), Unversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Bogdan A Popescu
- Department of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila"- Euroecolab, Emergency Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases "Prof. Dr. C. C. Iliescu", Sos. Fundeni 258, Sector 2, Bucharest, Romania
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pieske B, Tschöpe C, de Boer RA, Fraser AG, Anker SD, Donal E, Edelmann F, Fu M, Guazzi M, Lam CSP, Lancellotti P, Melenovsky V, Morris DA, Nagel E, Pieske-Kraigher E, Ponikowski P, Solomon SD, Vasan RS, Rutten FH, Voors AA, Ruschitzka F, Paulus WJ, Seferovic P, Filippatos G. How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2020; 40:3297-3317. [PMID: 31504452 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 790] [Impact Index Per Article: 197.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the 'HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm'. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for HF symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e'), left ventricular (LV) filling pressure estimated using E/e', left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2-4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F1: Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F2: Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burkert Pieske
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin, Partner Site, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Institute, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Germany
| | - Carsten Tschöpe
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin, Partner Site, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rudolf A de Boer
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Stefan D Anker
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin, Partner Site, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charite, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medicine Göttingen (UMG), Germany
| | - Erwan Donal
- Cardiology and CIC, IT1414, CHU de Rennes LTSI, Université Rennes-1, INSERM 1099, Rennes, France
| | - Frank Edelmann
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin, Partner Site, Germany
| | - Michael Fu
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hosptal/Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Marco Guazzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolyn S P Lam
- National Heart Centre, Singapore & Duke-National University of Singapore.,University Medical Centre Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Patrizio Lancellotti
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège Hospital, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
| | - Vojtech Melenovsky
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine - IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Daniel A Morris
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum
| | - Eike Nagel
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Pieske-Kraigher
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum
| | | | - Scott D Solomon
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ramachandran S Vasan
- Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Frans H Rutten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Voors
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Ruschitzka
- University Heart Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Walter J Paulus
- Department of Physiology and Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Petar Seferovic
- University of Belgrade School of Medicine, Belgrade University Medical Center, Serbia
| | - Gerasimos Filippatos
- Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School; University Hospital "Attikon", Athens, Greece.,University of Cyprus, School of Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pezel T, Sanguineti F, Kinnel M, Landon V, Bonnet G, Garot P, Hovasse T, Unterseeh T, Champagne S, Louvard Y, Claude Morice M, Garot J. Safety and Prognostic Value of Vasodilator Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13:e010599. [DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.120.010599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Background:
Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction <40%) referred for stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) may have a less optimal hemodynamic response to intravenous vasodilator. The aim was to assess the prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in patients with HFrEF.
Methods:
Between 2008 and 2018, consecutive patients with HFrEF defined by left ventricular ejection fraction <40% prospectively referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR were followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined by cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of inducible ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement by CMR.
Results:
Of 1053 patients with HFrEF (65±11 years, median [interquartile range] left ventricular ejection fraction 38.7% [37.2–39.0]), 1018 (97%) completed the CMR protocol and 950 (93%) completed the follow-up (median [interquartile range], 5.6 [3.6–7.3] years); 117 experienced a MACE (12.3%). Stress CMR was well tolerated without any adverse events. Patients without ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement experienced a lower annual event rate of MACE (1.8%) than those with both ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement (12.0%;
P
<0.001). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, inducible ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement were significantly associated with the occurrence of MACE (hazard ratio, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.69–3.60]; and hazard ratio, 2.92 [95% CI, 1.77–4.83], respectively, both
P
<0.001). In multivariable Cox regression, inducible ischemia was an independent predictor of a higher incidence of MACE (hazard ratio, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.52–3.35];
P
<0.001).
Conclusions:
Stress CMR is safe and has a good discriminative prognostic value to predict the occurrence of MACE in patients with HFrEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Théo Pezel
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., F.S., M.K., V.L., P.G., T.H., T.U., S.C., Y.L., M.C.M., J.G.)
| | - Francesca Sanguineti
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., F.S., M.K., V.L., P.G., T.H., T.U., S.C., Y.L., M.C.M., J.G.)
| | - Marine Kinnel
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., F.S., M.K., V.L., P.G., T.H., T.U., S.C., Y.L., M.C.M., J.G.)
| | - Valentin Landon
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., F.S., M.K., V.L., P.G., T.H., T.U., S.C., Y.L., M.C.M., J.G.)
| | - Guillaume Bonnet
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unit 970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, France (G.B.)
| | - Philippe Garot
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., F.S., M.K., V.L., P.G., T.H., T.U., S.C., Y.L., M.C.M., J.G.)
| | - Thomas Hovasse
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., F.S., M.K., V.L., P.G., T.H., T.U., S.C., Y.L., M.C.M., J.G.)
| | - Thierry Unterseeh
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., F.S., M.K., V.L., P.G., T.H., T.U., S.C., Y.L., M.C.M., J.G.)
| | - Stéphane Champagne
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., F.S., M.K., V.L., P.G., T.H., T.U., S.C., Y.L., M.C.M., J.G.)
| | - Yves Louvard
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., F.S., M.K., V.L., P.G., T.H., T.U., S.C., Y.L., M.C.M., J.G.)
| | - Marie Claude Morice
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., F.S., M.K., V.L., P.G., T.H., T.U., S.C., Y.L., M.C.M., J.G.)
| | - Jérôme Garot
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Hôpital Privé Jacques CARTIER, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., F.S., M.K., V.L., P.G., T.H., T.U., S.C., Y.L., M.C.M., J.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stress cardiac MRI in stable coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 2020; 35:566-573. [PMID: 32649360 DOI: 10.1097/hco.0000000000000776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Non-invasive testing is often the first step in the evaluation of stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an established modality with high diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value. This review will focus on the recent advances in understanding how stress CMR can help guide patient care. RECENT FINDINGS Diagnostic accuracy of stress CMR has been validated against coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with stable CAD. Large registry data have shown stress CMR to have important prognostic importance and that its cost-effectiveness compares favorably to alternatives. In patients with stable CAD, guidance using a CMR based strategy led to equivalent outcomes when compared to coronary angiography with FFR. SUMMARY In persons with stable CAD, Stress CMR is an accurate and cost-effective imaging modality that should be considered in patients at intermediate pre-test probability of CAD. Prognostic studies have shown it to have excellent negative predictive value and that it can safely serve as a "gatekeeper" for invasive angiography.
Collapse
|
24
|
Zoghbi WA, DiCarli MF, Blankstein R, Choi AD, Dilsizian V, Flachskampf FA, Geske JB, Grayburn PA, Jaffer FA, Kwong RY, Leipsic JA, Marwick TH, Nagel E, Nieman K, Raman SV, Salerno M, Sengupta PP, Shaw LJ, Chandrashekhar YS. Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Ramping Up Safely to a New Normal. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13:1615-1626. [PMID: 32646721 PMCID: PMC7290215 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- William A Zoghbi
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Marcelo F DiCarli
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ron Blankstein
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew D Choi
- Department of Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC; Department of Radiology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Vasken Dilsizian
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Frank A Flachskampf
- Clinical Physiology and Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jeffrey B Geske
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Paul A Grayburn
- Department of Medicine, Baylor Scott and White Heart and Vascular Hospital, Dallas Texas
| | - Farouc A Jaffer
- Cardiovascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raymond Y Kwong
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan A Leipsic
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Thomas H Marwick
- Department of Medicine, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eike Nagel
- Institute of Experimental and Translational Cardiac Imaging, German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt AM Main, Germany
| | - Koen Nieman
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Subha V Raman
- Division of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, Indiana
| | - Michael Salerno
- Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Partho P Sengupta
- Department of Medicine, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Leslee J Shaw
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Y S Chandrashekhar
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota and VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Foley JR, Richmond C, Fent GJ, Bissell M, Levelt E, Dall’armellina E, Swoboda PP, Plein S, Greenwood JP. Rapid Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Ischemic Heart Disease Investigation (RAPID-IHD). JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13:1632-1634. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
26
|
Marcos-Garces V, Gavara J, Monmeneu JV, Lopez-Lereu MP, Perez N, Rios-Navarro C, De Dios E, Moratal D, Miñana G, Nuñez J, Chorro FJ, Bodi V. A Novel Clinical and Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (C-CMR-10) Score to Predict Long-Term All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Known or Suspected Chronic Coronary Syndrome. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E1957. [PMID: 32585832 PMCID: PMC7356983 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance (stressCMR) has shown robust diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). However, it is unknown whether integration of stressCMR with clinical variables in a simple clinical-imaging score can straightforwardly predict all-cause mortality in this population. We included 6187 patients in a large registry that underwent stressCMR for known or suspected CCS. Several clinical and stressCMR variables were collected, such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ischemic burden (number of segments with stress-induced perfusion defects (PD)). During a median follow-up of 5.56 years, we registered 682 (11%) all-cause deaths. The only independent predictors of all-cause mortality in multivariable analysis were age, male sex, diabetes mellitus (DM), LVEF and ischemic burden. Based on the weight of the chi-square increase at each step of the multivariable analysis, we created a simple clinical-stressCMR (C-CMR-10) score that included these variables (age ≥ 65 years = 3 points, LVEF ≤ 50% = 3 points, DM = 2 points, male sex = 1 point, and ischemic burden > 5 segments = 1 point). This 0 to 10 points C-CMR-10 score showed good performance to predict all-cause annualized mortality rate ranging from 0.29%/year (score = 0) to >4.6%/year (score ≥ 7). The goodness of the model and of the C-CMR-10 score was separately confirmed in 2 internal cohorts (n > 3000 each). We conclude that a novel and simple clinical-stressCMR score, which includes clinical and stressCMR variables, can provide robust prediction of the risk of long-term all-cause mortality in a population of patients with known or suspected CCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Marcos-Garces
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (V.M.-G.); (G.M.); (J.N.); (F.JC.)
| | - Jose Gavara
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria INCLIVA, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (J.G.); (N.P.); (C.R.-N.)
- Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Jose V Monmeneu
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Exploraciones Radiologicas Especiales (ERESA), 46015 Valencia, Spain; (J.VM.); (M.PL.-L.)
| | - Maria P Lopez-Lereu
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Exploraciones Radiologicas Especiales (ERESA), 46015 Valencia, Spain; (J.VM.); (M.PL.-L.)
| | - Nerea Perez
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria INCLIVA, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (J.G.); (N.P.); (C.R.-N.)
| | - Cesar Rios-Navarro
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria INCLIVA, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (J.G.); (N.P.); (C.R.-N.)
| | - Elena De Dios
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red—Cardiovascular (CIBER-CV), 28029 Madrid, Spain;
| | - David Moratal
- Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Gema Miñana
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (V.M.-G.); (G.M.); (J.N.); (F.JC.)
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria INCLIVA, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (J.G.); (N.P.); (C.R.-N.)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red—Cardiovascular (CIBER-CV), 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Julio Nuñez
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (V.M.-G.); (G.M.); (J.N.); (F.JC.)
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria INCLIVA, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (J.G.); (N.P.); (C.R.-N.)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red—Cardiovascular (CIBER-CV), 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Francisco J Chorro
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (V.M.-G.); (G.M.); (J.N.); (F.JC.)
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria INCLIVA, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (J.G.); (N.P.); (C.R.-N.)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red—Cardiovascular (CIBER-CV), 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Vicente Bodi
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (V.M.-G.); (G.M.); (J.N.); (F.JC.)
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria INCLIVA, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (J.G.); (N.P.); (C.R.-N.)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red—Cardiovascular (CIBER-CV), 28029 Madrid, Spain;
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Giusca S, Wolf D, Hofmann N, Hagstotz S, Forschner M, Schueler M, Nunninger P, Kelle S, Korosoglou G. Splenic Switch-Off for Determining the Optimal Dosage for Adenosine Stress Cardiac MR in Terms of Stress Effectiveness and Patient Safety. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 52:1732-1742. [PMID: 32557923 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adenosine stress MRI is well established for the evaluation of known and suspected coronary artery disease. However, a proportion of patients might be "under-stressed" using the standard adenosine dose. PURPOSE To compare three different adenosine dosages for stress MRI in terms of stress adequacy based on splenic switch-off (SSO) and limiting side effects. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION In all, 100 patients were randomized in group 1 (33 pts), group 2 (34 pts), and group 3 (33 pts), receiving dosages of 140 μg/kg/min, 175 μg/kg/min, or 210 μg/kg/min, respectively. SSO was evaluated visually and quantitatively. SEQUENCE Stress perfusion was performed using a 1.5T scanner in three short axes using a standard single-shot, saturation recovery gradient-echo sequence. ASSESSMENT Three blinded experienced operators evaluated SSO on stress and rest perfusion acquisitions in the three groups. The signal intensity of the spleen and myocardium and the presence of inducible ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement were assessed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS T-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-squared test, and Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS SSO was present more frequently in patients receiving 175 μg/kg/min and 210 μg/kg/min (31/33 [94%] and 27/29 [93%], respectively) compared to those receiving the standard dose (19/33 [58%], P < 0.05). A positive stress result was noted in 3/33 (9%) patients receiving 140 μg/kg/min vs. 9/33 (27%) patients receiving 175 μg/kg/min and 10/31 (33%) patients receiving 210 μg/kg/min (P < 0.05 for all, P < 0.05 for group 1 vs. groups 2, 3). The relative decrease of splenic signal intensity at hyperemia vs. baseline was significantly lower in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (-33% vs. -54%, -56%, respectively; P < 0.05). No adverse events during scanning were noted in groups 1 and 2, whereas in group 3 four examinations were stopped due to severe dyspnea (n = 2) and AV-blockage (n = 2). DATA CONCLUSION A dosage of 175 μg/kg/min adenosine results in a higher proportion of SSO, which may be an indirect marker of adequate coronary vasodilatation and simultaneously offers similar safety compared to the standard 140 μg/kg/min dosage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2020;52:1732-1742.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sorin Giusca
- Department of Cardiology Angiology and Pneumology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany
| | - David Wolf
- Department of Cardiology Angiology and Pneumology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany
| | - Nina Hofmann
- Department of Cardiology Angiology and Pneumology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany
| | - Saskia Hagstotz
- Department of Cardiology Angiology and Pneumology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany
| | | | - Melanie Schueler
- Department of Cardiology Angiology and Pneumology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian Kelle
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Charité Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Grigorios Korosoglou
- Department of Cardiology Angiology and Pneumology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
After ISCHEMIA: Is cardiac MRI a reliable gatekeeper for invasive angiography and myocardial revascularization? Herz 2020; 45:446-452. [PMID: 32458013 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-020-04936-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
This review surveys the findings of the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial and puts them into a clinical perspective regarding its effect of the role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as a well-validated gatekeeper for invasive angiography and myocardial revascularization. Noninvasive stress testing of patients with intermediate-to-high pretest likelihood for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) using perfusion CMR provides excellent diagnostic accuracy in detecting ischemic myocardium, and additional information from tissue characterization can guide the management of patients with stable angina toward a more individualized therapy as other non-coronary underlying causes of chest pain can be detected. Since ISCHEMIA failed to show that an invasive strategy using percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with an improved prognosis compared with initial conservative medical therapy among stable patients with moderate-to-severe ischemia, CMR as a multifaceted diagnostic imaging approach to explain patients' symptoms should be preferred over anatomical and stress testing alone. Nevertheless, the exclusion of left main coronary artery stenosis either by coronary CT or MR angiography may be required. In conclusion, the results of the ISCHEMIA trial are in good accordance with those of the MR-INFORM trial recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, as the noninvasive management of a large proportion of patients with CAD was shown to be noninferior to current invasive strategies. Recent outcome data from trials may therefore have an impact on future guidelines to further reduce the execution of unnecessary left heart catheterizations.
Collapse
|
29
|
Situ Y, Birch SCM, Moreyra C, Holloway CJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for structural heart disease. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2020; 10:361-375. [PMID: 32420118 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2019.06.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has increasingly become a powerful imaging technique over the past few decades due to increasing knowledge about clinical applications, operator experience and technological advances, including the introduction of high field strength magnets, leading to improved signal-to-noise ratio. Its success is attributed to the free choice of imaging planes, the wide variety of imaging techniques, and the lack of harmful radiation. Developments in CMR have led to the accurate evaluation of cardiac structure, function and tissues characterisation, so this non-invasive technique has become a powerful tool for a broad range of cardiac pathologies. This review will provide an introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) physics, an overview of the current techniques and clinical application of CMR in structural heart disease, and illustrated examples of its use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiling Situ
- St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.,Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | | | - Camila Moreyra
- St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cameron J Holloway
- St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.,Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pieske B, Tschöpe C, de Boer RA, Fraser AG, Anker SD, Donal E, Edelmann F, Fu M, Guazzi M, Lam CSP, Lancellotti P, Melenovsky V, Morris DA, Nagel E, Pieske-Kraigher E, Ponikowski P, Solomon SD, Vasan RS, Rutten FH, Voors AA, Ruschitzka F, Paulus WJ, Seferovic P, Filippatos G. How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur J Heart Fail 2020; 22:391-412. [PMID: 32133741 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the 'HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm'. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for heart failure symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e'), LV filling pressure estimated using E/e', left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2-4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F1 : Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F2 : Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burkert Pieske
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin, Partner Site, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, German Heart Institute, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Germany
| | - Carsten Tschöpe
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin, Partner Site, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rudolf A de Boer
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Stefan D Anker
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin, Partner Site, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charite, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medicine Göttingen (UMG), Germany
| | - Erwan Donal
- Cardiology and CIC, IT1414, CHU de Rennes LTSI, Université Rennes-1, INSERM 1099, Rennes, France
| | - Frank Edelmann
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin, Partner Site, Germany
| | - Michael Fu
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hosptal/Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Marco Guazzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolyn S P Lam
- National Heart Centre, Singapore & Duke-National University of Singapore.,University Medical Centre Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Patrizio Lancellotti
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège Hospital, GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
| | - Vojtech Melenovsky
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine - IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Daniel A Morris
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum
| | - Eike Nagel
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Pieske-Kraigher
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum
| | | | - Scott D Solomon
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ramachandran S Vasan
- Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Frans H Rutten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Voors
- University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Ruschitzka
- University Heart Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Walter J Paulus
- Department of Physiology and Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Petar Seferovic
- University of Belgrade School of Medicine, Belgrade University Medical Center, Serbia
| | - Gerasimos Filippatos
- Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School; University Hospital "Attikon", Athens, Greece.,University of Cyprus, School of Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
Le MTP, Zarinabad N, D’Angelo T, Mia I, Heinke R, Vogl TJ, Zeiher A, Nagel E, Puntmann VO. Sub-segmental quantification of single (stress)-pass perfusion CMR improves the diagnostic accuracy for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2020; 22:14. [PMID: 32028980 PMCID: PMC7006214 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-020-0600-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myocardial perfusion with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is an established diagnostic test for evaluation of myocardial ischaemia. For quantification purposes, the 16 segment American Heart Association (AHA) model poses limitations in terms of extracting relevant information on the extent/severity of ischaemia as perfusion deficits will not always fall within an individual segment, which reduces its diagnostic value, and makes an accurate assessment of outcome data or a result comparison across various studies difficult. We hypothesised that division of the myocardial segments into epi- and endocardial layers and a further circumferential subdivision, resulting in a total of 96 segments, would improve the accuracy of detecting myocardial hypoperfusion. Higher (sub-)subsegmental recording of perfusion abnormalities, which are defined relatively to the normal reference using the subsegment with the highest value, may improve the spatial encoding of myocardial blood flow, based on a single stress perfusion acquisition. OBJECTIVE A proof of concept comparison study of subsegmentation approaches based on transmural segments (16 AHA and 48 segments) vs. subdivision into epi- and endocardial (32) subsegments vs. further circumferential subdivision into 96 (sub-)subsegments for diagnostic accuracy against invasively defined obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS Thirty patients with obstructive CAD and 20 healthy controls underwent perfusion stress CMR imaging at 3 T during maximal adenosine vasodilation and a dual bolus injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol. Using Fermi deconvolution for blood flow estimation, (sub-)subsegmental values were expressed relative to the (sub-)subsegment with the highest flow. In addition, endo-/epicardial flow ratios were calculated based on 32 and 96 (sub-)subsegments. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance of discrimination between patients with CAD and healthy controls. Observer reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman approaches. RESULTS Subdivision into more and smaller segments revealed greater accuracy for #32, #48 and # 96 compared to the standard #16 approach (area under the curve (AUC): 0.937, 0.973 and 0.993 vs 0.820, p < 0.05). The #96-based endo-/epicardial ratio was superior to the #32 endo-/epicardial ratio (AUC 0.979, vs. 0.932, p < 0.05). Measurements for the #16 model showed marginally better reproducibility compared to #32, #48 and #96 (mean difference ± standard deviation: 2.0 ± 3.6 vs. 2.3 ± 4.0 vs 2.5 ± 4.4 vs. 4.1 ± 5.6). CONCLUSIONS Subsegmentation of the myocardium improves diagnostic accuracy and facilitates an objective cut-off-based description of hypoperfusion, and facilitates an objective description of hypoperfusion, including the extent and severity of myocardial ischaemia. Quantification based on a single (stress-only) pass reduces the overall amount of gadolinium contrast agent required and the length of the overall diagnostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie T. P. Le
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Niloufar Zarinabad
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Tommaso D’Angelo
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, G. Martino University Hospital Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, Messina, 98100 Italy
| | - Ibnul Mia
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Robert Heinke
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Thomas J. Vogl
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas Zeiher
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Eike Nagel
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Valentina O. Puntmann
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen D, Lo-Kioeng-Shioe M, van Domburg RT, Deckers JW, Kuijpers D, van Dijkman PRM. Stress-Only Adenosine CMR Improves Diagnostic Yield in Stable Symptomatic Patients With Coronary Artery Calcium. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13:1152-1160. [PMID: 31954641 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study assessed whether adenosine stress-only perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) following a positive coronary artery calcium (CAC) score improved the diagnostic yield of invasive coronary angiography (CAG) in patients with stable chest pain. The study also established the association between positive CAC scores and stress-induced myocardial ischemia. BACKGROUND The diagnostic yield of catheterization among patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) is low. Improved patient selection and diagnostic testing are necessary. The CAC score can minimize unnecessary diagnostic testing, and in low-risk patients, normal CMR results have a high negative predictive value. Less comprehensive protocols may be sufficient to guide further work-up. METHODS A total of 642 consecutive patients (mean age: 63 years; 50% women) with stable chest pain and CAC scores of >0 who were referred for CMR were enrolled. Patients with a perfusion defect were subsequently examined by CAG. Patients were followed up for 1 year. Outcome was obstructive CAD. RESULTS Obstructive CAD was present in 12% of patients. For CAD diagnosis, the sensitivity of adenosine CMR was 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.7 to 93.1), specificity was 98.7% (95% CI: 97.9 to 99.6), positive predictive value was 92.0% (95% CI: 89.8 to 94.1), and negative predictive value was 98.6% (95% CI: 97.6 to 99.5). A CAC score between 0.1 and 100 without typical angina was associated with obstructive CAD in only 3% of patients. Patients with nonanginal chest pain and a CAC score ≥400 had obstructive CAD (16%). CONCLUSIONS Stress-only adenosine CMR had high diagnostic accuracy and served as an efficient gatekeeper to CAG in stable patients with a CAC score >0. Patients with CAC scores between 0.1 and 100 could be deferred from further testing in the absence of clinical features that suggested high risk. However, in patients with CAC score ≥400, functional testing should be indicated, regardless of the type of chest pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorine Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen
- Haaglanden Medical Center Bronovo, Department of Cardiology, The Hague, the Netherlands; Haaglanden Medical Center Bronovo, Department of Radiology, The Hague, the Netherlands; Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ron T van Domburg
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap W Deckers
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Dirkjan Kuijpers
- Haaglanden Medical Center Bronovo, Department of Radiology, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Paul R M van Dijkman
- Haaglanden Medical Center Bronovo, Department of Cardiology, The Hague, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
The spectrum of myocarditis: from pathology to the clinics. Virchows Arch 2019; 475:279-301. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-019-02615-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
36
|
Contemporary Issues in Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion CMR Imaging. CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s12410-019-9484-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
37
|
Bohnen S, Prüßner L, Vettorazzi E, Radunski UK, Tahir E, Schneider J, Cavus E, Avanesov M, Stehning C, Adam G, Blankenberg S, Lund GK, Muellerleile K. Stress T1-mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and inducible myocardial ischemia. Clin Res Cardiol 2019; 108:909-920. [PMID: 30701297 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-019-01421-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alterations in native myocardial T1 under vasodilation stress ("T1 reactivity") were recently proposed as a non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) method to detect myocardial ischemia. This study evaluated the performance of a segmental, truly non-contrast stress T1 mapping CMR approach to detect inducible ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS One-hundred patients with suspected/known coronary artery disease underwent CMR at 3.0 or 1.5 T. T1 mapping was performed using the 5s(3s)3s-modified look-locker inversion-recovery (MOLLI) sequence at rest and under regadenoson stress. We defined T1 reactivity as the change in native T1 from rest to stress (1) in the 16-segment AHA model independent from perfusion images and (2) in focal regions of interest that were copied from perfusion images to T1 maps. We compared T1 reactivity between segments/regions with inducible ischemia, scar, and remote myocardium for both approaches. Segmental T1 reactivity was significantly lower in segments including inducible ischemia [- 1.15 (95% CI, - 2.16 to - 0.14)%] compared to remote segments [2.49 (95% CI, 1.87 to 3.11)%; p < 0.001]. Focal T1 reactivity was also significantly lower [- 2.65 (95% CI, - 3.84 to - 1.46)%] in regions with stress-perfusion defects compared to remote regions [4.72 (95% CI, 3.90 to 5.54)%; p < 0.001]. However, the performance of segmental T1 reactivity to depict inducible ischemia was significantly inferior compared to the focal approach (AUCs 0.68 versus 0.85; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Myocardium with inducible ischemia is characterized by the absence of significant T1 reactivity, but a clinically applicable approach for truly non-contrast stress T1 mapping remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Bohnen
- General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany.
| | - Lennard Prüßner
- General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - E Vettorazzi
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ulf K Radunski
- General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Enver Tahir
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Schneider
- General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Ersin Cavus
- General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Maxim Avanesov
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Stehning
- Philips Research Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Adam
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| | - Gunnar K Lund
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kai Muellerleile
- General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gulsin GS, Abdelaty AMSEK, Shetye A, Lai FY, Bajaj A, Das I, Deshpande A, Rao PPG, Khoo J, McCann GP, Arnold JR. Haemodynamic effects of pharmacologic stress with adenosine in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Int J Cardiol 2018; 278:157-161. [PMID: 30528627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Revised: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with heart failure, downregulation of adenosine receptor gene expression and impaired adenosine-related signal transduction may result in a diminished response to adenosine. This may have implications for cardiac stress testing. We evaluated the haemodynamic response to intravenous adenosine in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) undergoing stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). METHODS AND RESULTS We retrospectively examined 497 consecutive patients referred for clinical stress CMR. Blood pressure and heart rate responses with intravenous adenosine were compared in patients with normal, mild-moderately impaired and severely impaired LV systolic function (ejection fraction [EF] > 55%, 36-55% and < 35%, respectively). Following 2 min of adenosine infusion, there was a significant difference between the groups in the heart rate change from baseline, with a diminished heart rate response in patients with LVSD (p < 0.001). An increase in the dose of adenosine (up to 210 μg/kg/min) was required to achieve a sufficient haemodynamic response in more patients with severe LVSD (41%) than those with mild-moderately impaired and normal LV systolic function (24% and 19%, respectively, p < 0.001). Even with increased doses of adenosine in subjects with severe LVSD, peak haemodynamic response remained blunted. With multivariate analysis age (p < 0.001) and LVEF (p = 0.031) were independent predictors of heart rate response to adenosine. CONCLUSION Patients with reduced LVEF referred for stress CMR may have a blunted heart rate response to adenosine. Further study is warranted to determine whether this may be associated with reduced diagnostic accuracy and also the potential utility of further dose increases or alternative stressors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav S Gulsin
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Ahmed M S E K Abdelaty
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Abhishek Shetye
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Florence Y Lai
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Amrita Bajaj
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Indrajeet Das
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Aparna Deshpande
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Praveen P G Rao
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Jeffrey Khoo
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Gerry P McCann
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
| | - Jayanth R Arnold
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Evaluation of myocardial viability in myocardial infarction patients by magnetic resonance perfusion and delayed enhancement imaging. Herz 2018; 44:735-742. [DOI: 10.1007/s00059-018-4741-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
40
|
Bohnen S, Avanesov M, Jagodzinski A, Schnabel RB, Zeller T, Karakas M, Schneider J, Tahir E, Cavus E, Spink C, Radunski UK, Ojeda F, Adam G, Blankenberg S, Lund GK, Muellerleile K. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in the prospective, population-based, Hamburg City Health cohort study: objectives and design. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2018; 20:68. [PMID: 30244673 PMCID: PMC6151919 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-018-0490-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this work is to describe the objectives and design of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the single center, prospective, population-based Hamburg City Health study (HCHS). The HCHS aims at improving risk stratification for coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). METHODS The HCHS will finally include 45,000 inhabitants of the city of Hamburg (Germany) between 45 and 74 years who undergo an extensive cardiovascular evaluation and collection of biomaterials. Risk-scores for CAD, AF and HF are used to create enriched subpopulations who are invited for CMR. A total number of approximately 12,362 subjects will undergo CMR and incident CAD, AF and HF will be assessed after 6 years follow-up. The standard CMR protocol includes cine-CMR, T1 and T2 mapping, aortic/mitral valve flow measurements, Late gadolinium enhancement, angiographies and measurements of aortic distensibility. A stress-perfusion scan is added in individuals at risk for CAD. The workflow of CMR data acquisition and analyses was evaluated in a pilot cohort of 200 unselected subjects. RESULTS The obtained CMR findings in the pilot cohort agree with current reference values and demonstrate the ability of the established workflow to accomplish the objectives of HCHS. CONCLUSIONS CMR in HCHS promises novel insights into major cardiovascular diseases, their subclinical precursors and the prognostic value of novel imaging biomarkers. The HCHS database will facilitate combined analyses of imaging, clinical and molecular data ("Radiomics").
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Bohnen
- University Heart Center Hamburg, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maxim Avanesov
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Annika Jagodzinski
- University Heart Center Hamburg, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung e. V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Renate B. Schnabel
- University Heart Center Hamburg, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung e. V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Zeller
- University Heart Center Hamburg, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung e. V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mahir Karakas
- University Heart Center Hamburg, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung e. V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Schneider
- University Heart Center Hamburg, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Enver Tahir
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ersin Cavus
- University Heart Center Hamburg, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clemens Spink
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ulf K. Radunski
- University Heart Center Hamburg, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francisco Ojeda
- University Heart Center Hamburg, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Adam
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- University Heart Center Hamburg, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung e. V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gunnar K. Lund
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kai Muellerleile
- University Heart Center Hamburg, Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung e. V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Vasodilator Stress Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography or Contrast Stress Echocardiography Association with Hard Cardiac Events in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2018; 31:683-691. [DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
42
|
Stillman AE, Oudkerk M, Bluemke DA, de Boer MJ, Bremerich J, Garcia EV, Gutberlet M, van der Harst P, Hundley WG, Jerosch-Herold M, Kuijpers D, Kwong RY, Nagel E, Lerakis S, Oshinski J, Paul JF, Slart RHJA, Thourani V, Vliegenthart R, Wintersperger BJ. Imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018; 34:1249-1263. [PMID: 29556943 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1330-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive imaging plays a growing role in the diagnosis and management of ischemic heart disease from its earliest manifestations of endothelial dysfunction to myocardial infarction along the myocardial ischemic cascade. Experts representing the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology have worked together to organize the role of non-invasive imaging along the framework of the ischemic cascade. The current status of non-invasive imaging for ischemic heart disease is reviewed along with the role of imaging for guiding surgical planning. The issue of cost effectiveness is also considered. Preclinical disease is primarily assessed through the coronary artery calcium score and used for risk assessment. Once the patient becomes symptomatic, other imaging tests including echocardiography, CCTA, SPECT, PET and CMR may be useful. CCTA appears to be a cost-effective gatekeeper. Post infarction CMR and PET are the preferred modalities. Imaging is increasingly used for surgical planning of patients who may require coronary artery bypass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur E Stillman
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- Center of Medical Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David A Bluemke
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Menko Jan de Boer
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jens Bremerich
- Department of Radiology, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ernest V Garcia
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Matthias Gutberlet
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Pim van der Harst
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - W Gregory Hundley
- Departments of Internal Medicine & Radiology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Dirkjan Kuijpers
- Department of Radiology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond Y Kwong
- Department of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eike Nagel
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, DZHK Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | | | - John Oshinski
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | | | - Riemer H J A Slart
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Vinod Thourani
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Muehlberg F, Arnhold K, Fritschi S, Funk S, Prothmann M, Kermer J, Zange L, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Schulz-Menger J. Comparison of fast multi-slice and standard segmented techniques for detection of late gadolinium enhancement in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy - a prospective clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance trial. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2018; 20:13. [PMID: 29458430 PMCID: PMC5819178 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-018-0434-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Segmented phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) sequences are reference standard for non-invasive evaluation of myocardial fibrosis using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Several multi-slice LGE sequences have been introduced for faster acquisition in patients with arrhythmia and insufficient breathhold capability. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of several multi-slice LGE sequences to detect and quantify myocardial fibrosis in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic myocardial disease. METHODS Patients with known or suspected LGE due to chronic infarction, inflammatory myocardial disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) were prospectively recruited. LGE images were acquired 10-20 min after administration of 0.2 mmol/kg gadolinium-based contrast agent. Three different LGE sequences were acquired: a segmented, single-slice/single-breath-hold fast low angle shot PSIR sequence (FLASH-PSIR), a multi-slice balanced steady-state free precession inversion recovery sequence (bSSFP-IR) and a multi-slice bSSFP-PSIR sequence during breathhold and free breathing. Image quality was evaluated with a 4-point scoring system. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and acquisition time were evaluated. LGE was quantitatively assessed using a semi-automated threshold method. Differences in size of fibrosis were analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS Three hundred twelve patients were enrolled (n = 212 chronic infarction, n = 47 inflammatory myocardial disease, n = 53 HCM) Of which 201 patients (67,4%) had detectable LGE (n = 143 with chronic infarction, n = 27 with inflammatory heart disease and n = 31 with HCM). Image quality and CNR were best on multi-slice bSSFP-PSIR. Acquisition times were significantly shorter for all multi-slice sequences (bSSFP-IR: 23.4 ± 7.2 s; bSSFP-PSIR: 21.9 ± 6.4 s) as compared to FLASH-PSIR (361.5 ± 95.33 s). There was no significant difference of mean LGE size for all sequences in all study groups (FLASH-PSIR: 8.96 ± 10.64 g; bSSFP-IR: 8.69 ± 10.75 g; bSSFP-PSIR: 9.05 ± 10.84 g; bSSFP-PSIR free breathing: 8.85 ± 10.71 g, p > 0.05). LGE size was not affected by arrhythmia or absence of breathhold on multi-slice LGE sequences. CONCLUSIONS Fast multi-slice and standard segmented LGE sequences are equivalent techniques for the assessment of myocardial fibrosis, independent of an ischemic or non-ischemic etiology. Even in patients with arrhythmia and insufficient breathhold capability, multi-slice sequences yield excellent image quality at significantly reduced scan time and may be used as standard LGE approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN48802295 (retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Muehlberg
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kristin Arnhold
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Simone Fritschi
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Funk
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcel Prothmann
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Josephine Kermer
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Leonora Zange
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jeanette Schulz-Menger
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
D’Angelo T, Grigoratos C, Mazziotti S, Bratis K, Pathan F, Blandino A, Elen E, Puntmann VO, Nagel E. High-throughput gadobutrol-enhanced CMR: a time and dose optimization study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2017; 19:83. [PMID: 29110679 PMCID: PMC5674223 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0400-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing time and contrast agent doses are important goals to provide cost-efficient cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Limited information is available regarding the feasibility of evaluating left ventricular (LV) function after gadobutrol injection as well as defining the lowest dose for high quality scar imaging. We sought to evaluate both aspects separately and systematically to provide an optimized protocol for contrast-enhanced CMR (CE-CMR) using gadobutrol. METHODS This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind cross-over study performed in two different populations. The first population consisted of 30 patients with general indications for a rest CE-CMR who underwent cine-imaging before and immediately after intravenous administration of 0.1 mmol/kg body-weight of gadobutrol. Quantitative assessment of LV volumes and function was performed by the same reader in a randomized and blinded fashion. The second population was composed of 30 patients with indication to late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging, which was performed twice at different gadobutrol doses (0.1 mmol/kg vs. 0.2 mmol/kg) and at different time delays (5 and 10 min vs. 5, 10, 15 and 20 min), within a maximal interval of 21 days. LGE images were analysed qualitatively (contrast-to-noise ratio) and quantitatively (LGE%-of-mass). RESULTS Excellent correlation between pre- and post-contrast cine-imaging was found, with no difference of LV stroke volume and ejection fraction (p = 0.538 and p = 0.095, respectively). End-diastolic-volume and end-systolic-volume were measured significantly larger after contrast injection (p = 0.008 and p = 0.001, respectively), with a mean difference of 3.7 ml and 2.9 ml, respectively. LGE imaging resulted in optimal contrast-to-noise ratios 10 min post-injection for a gadobutrol dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body-weight and 20 min for a dose of 0.2 mmol/kg body-weight. At these time points LGE quantification did not significantly differ (0.1 mmol/kg: 11% (16.4); 0.2 mmol/kg: 12% (14.5); p = 0.059), showing excellent correlation (ICC = 0.957; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION A standardized CE-CMR rest protocol giving a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadobutrol before cine-imaging and performing LGE 10 min after injection represents a fast low-dose protocol without significant loss of information in comparison to a longer protocol with cine-imaging before contrast injection and a higher dose of gadobutrol. This approach allows to reduce examination time and costs as well as minimize contrast-agent exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso D’Angelo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, G. Martino University Hospital Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98100 Messina, Italy
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, DZHK Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern- Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Chrysanthos Grigoratos
- G. Monasterio CNR-Tuscany Foundation, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, King’s College London, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Silvio Mazziotti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, G. Martino University Hospital Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Bratis
- Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, King’s College London, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Faraz Pathan
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, DZHK Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern- Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - Alfredo Blandino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, G. Martino University Hospital Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Elen Elen
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, DZHK Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern- Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Valentina O. Puntmann
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, DZHK Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern- Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, King’s College London, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, DZHK Rhein-Main, Theodor-Stern- Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Eike Nagel
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, DZHK Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern- Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, King’s College London, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, DZHK Rhein-Main, Theodor-Stern- Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
D'Angelo T, Nagel E. Overcoming the difficulties to adequately detect myocardial ischaemia in women. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 18:1107-1108. [PMID: 28984892 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jex195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso D'Angelo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, G. Martino University Hospital, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124 Messina ME, Italy.,Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, DZHK Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7; 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Eike Nagel
- Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, DZHK Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7; 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Fuetterer M, Busch J, Peereboom SM, von Deuster C, Wissmann L, Lipiski M, Fleischmann T, Cesarovic N, Stoeck CT, Kozerke S. Hyperpolarized 13C urea myocardial first-pass perfusion imaging using velocity-selective excitation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2017; 19:46. [PMID: 28637508 PMCID: PMC5480203 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0364-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A velocity-selective binomial excitation scheme for myocardial first-pass perfusion measurements with hyperpolarized 13C substrates, which preserves bolus magnetization inside the blood pool, is presented. The proposed method is evaluated against gadolinium-enhanced 1H measurements in-vivo. METHODS The proposed excitation with an echo-planar imaging readout was implemented on a clinical CMR system. Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion images were acquired in six healthy pigs after bolus injection of hyperpolarized 13C urea with the velocity-selective vs. conventional excitation, as well as standard 1H gadolinium-enhanced images. Signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise (CNR) and homogeneity of semi-quantitative perfusion measures were compared between methods based on first-pass signal-intensity time curves extracted from a mid-ventricular slice. Diagnostic feasibility is demonstrated in a case of septal infarction. RESULTS Velocity-selective excitation provides over three-fold reduction in blood pool signal with a two-fold increase in myocardial CNR. Extracted first-pass perfusion curves reveal a significantly reduced variability of semi-quantitative first-pass perfusion measures (12-20%) for velocity-selective excitation compared to conventional excitation (28-93%), comparable to that of reference 1H gadolinium data (9-15%). Overall image quality appears comparable between the velocity-selective hyperpolarized and gadolinium-enhanced imaging. CONCLUSION The feasibility of hyperpolarized 13C first-pass perfusion CMR has been demonstrated in swine. Comparison with reference 1H gadolinium data revealed sufficient data quality and indicates the potential of hyperpolarized perfusion imaging for human applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Fuetterer
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Julia Busch
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sophie M. Peereboom
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Constantin von Deuster
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Wissmann
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Miriam Lipiski
- Division of Surgical Research, University Hospital Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 14, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thea Fleischmann
- Division of Surgical Research, University Hospital Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 14, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nikola Cesarovic
- Division of Surgical Research, University Hospital Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 14, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian T. Stoeck
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Kozerke
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kwong RY, Shaw LJ, Nagel E. Can Stress CMR Impact Care in the Era After COURAGE and FAME-2? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10:538-540. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|