The "Native T1 Versus Extracellular Volume Fraction Paradox" in Cardiac Amyloidosis: Answer to the Million-Dollar Question?

A compartment-based myocardial density approach helps to solve the native T1 vs. ECV paradox in cardiac amyloidosis

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) plays an important clinical role for diagnosis and therapy monitoring of cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Previous data suggested a lower native T1 value in spite of a higher LV mass and higher extracellular volume fraction (ECV) value in wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) compared to light-chain amyloidosis (AL)-resulting in the still unsolved "native T1 vs. ECV paradox" in CA. The purpose of this study was to address this paradox. The present study comprised N = 90 patients with ATTRwt and N = 30 patients with AL who underwent multi-parametric CMR studies prior to any specific treatment. The CMR protocol comprised cine- and late-gadolinium-enhancement (LGE)-imaging as well as T2-mapping and pre-/post-contrast T1-mapping allowing to measure myocardial ECV. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF), left ventricular mass index (LVMi) and left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) were significantly higher in ATTRwt in comparison to AL. Indexed ECV (ECVi) was also higher in ATTRwt (p = 0.041 for global and p = 0.001 for basal septal). In contrast, native T1- [1094 ms (1069-1127 ms) in ATTRwt vs. 1,122 ms (1076-1160 ms) in AL group, p = 0.040] and T2-values [57 ms (55-60 ms) vs. 60 ms (57-64 ms); p = 0.001] were higher in AL. Considering particularities in myocardial density, "total extracellular mass" (TECM) was substantially higher in ATTRwt whereas "total intracellular mass" (TICM) was rather similar between ATTRwt and AL. Consequently, the "ratio TICM/TECM" was lower in ATTRwt compared to AL (0.58 vs. 0.83; p = 0.007). Our data confirm the presence of a "native T1 vs. ECV paradox" with lower native T1 values in spite of higher myocardial mass and ECV in ATTRwt compared to AL. Importantly, this observation can be explained by particularities regarding myocardial density that result in a lower TICM/TECM "ratio" in case of ATTRwt compared to AL-since native T1 is determined by this ratio.

State of the Art: Quantitative Cardiac MRI in Cardiac Amyloidosis

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is characterized by amyloid infiltration in the myocardial extracellular space, causing heart failure. Patients with CA are currently underdiagnosed. Cardiac involvement is significantly associated with the prognosis and treatment decision-making for CA. Early identification and accurate stratification are the crucial first step in patient management. Comprehensive cardiac MRI-based evaluation of the cardiac structure, function, and myocardial tissue characterization assesses cardiac involvement by tracing disease processes. Emerging quantitative tissue characterization techniques have introduced new measures that can identify early staged CA and monitor disease progression or response after treatment. Quantitative cardiac MRI is becoming an instrumental tool in understanding CA, which leads to changes in individualized patient care. This review aimed to discuss the quantitative cardiac MRI-based assessment of CA using established and emerging techniques. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Myocardial Composition in Light-Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis More Than 1 Year After Successful Therapy

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to characterize myocardial composition during the active and remission phases of light-chain (AL) cardiac amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND

Cardiac dysfunction in AL amyloidosis is characterized by dual insults to the myocardium from infiltration and toxicity from light chains during the active phase and by infiltration alone in the remission phase.

METHODS

Prospectively enrolled subjects with cardiac AL amyloidosis (21 remission AL amyloidosis; age: 63.4 ± 7.3 years; 47.6% male; and 48 active AL amyloidosis; age: 62.5 ± 7.4 years; 60.4% male) underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance with T1 and T2 mapping and measurement of extracellular volume (ECV). By definition, serum free light-chain levels were normal for at least 1 year following successful AL therapy in the remission group and abnormal in the active group.

RESULTS

Myocardial ECV was similarly expanded in the remission and active AL amyloidosis groups (0.488 ± 0.082 vs 0.519 ± 0.083, respectively; P = 0.15). However, myocardial T2 relaxation times (47.7 ± 3.2 ms vs 45.5 ± 3.0 ms; P = 0.008) as well as native T1 times (1,368 ms [IQR: 1,290-1,422 ms] vs 1,264 ms [IQR: 1,203-1,380 ms]; P = 0.024) were significantly higher in the remission compared to the active AL amyloidosis group.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial ECV is substantially expanded in the active AL and remission AL cardiac amyloidosis groups, but native T1 values were higher, suggesting a different myocardial composition. There is no evidence of myocardial edema in active AL cardiac amyloidosis. Future phenotyping studies of AL cardiac amyloidosis need to consider complementary myocardial markers that define the interstitial milieu in addition to changes in extracellular volume. (Molecular Imaging of Primary Amyloid Cardiomyopathy; NCT02641145).

[Cardiac amyloidosis and aortic valve stenosis]

Aortic valve stenosis in old age has become a topic of interest for cardiology and cardiac surgery after the development of transvascular and transluminal minimally invasive techniques for aortic valve implantation. The observation of amyloid deposits in surgically excised valvular material led to the diagnostics of amyloidosis of the myocardium, which was discovered in up to 20% of the patients who underwent valve implantation. Clinical signs of cardiac amyloidosis, such as carpal tunnel syndrome and ruptured distal biceps tendon should be taken into account. In addition to the electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiogram and magnetic resonance imaging, ^99mtechnetium bone scintigraphy plays a key diagnostic role. The simultaneous occurrence of severe aortic valve stenosis and amyloidosis explains the special hemodynamic situation of a low gradient with low blood flow in high-grade valve stenosis. The interventional or surgical valve implantation improves the prognosis for these patients, similarly to aortic valve stenosis alone, followed by a specific pharmaceutical treatment depending on the type of amyloidosis.

Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: position statement of the German Cardiac Society (DGK)

Systemic forms of amyloidosis affecting the heart are mostly light-chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidoses. The latter is caused by deposition of misfolded transthyretin, either in wild-type (ATTRwt) or mutant (ATTRv) conformation. For diagnostics, specific serum biomarkers and modern non-invasive imaging techniques, such as cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and scintigraphic methods, are available today. These imaging techniques do not only complement conventional echocardiography, but also allow for accurate assessment of the extent of cardiac involvement, in addition to diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis. Endomyocardial biopsy still plays a major role in the histopathological diagnosis and subtyping of cardiac amyloidosis. The main objective of the diagnostic algorithm outlined in this position statement is to detect cardiac amyloidosis as reliably and early as possible, to accurately determine its extent, and to reliably identify the underlying subtype of amyloidosis, thereby enabling subsequent targeted treatment.

Diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in comparison to endomyocardial biopsy in cardiac amyloidosis: a multi-centre study

Background

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an infiltrative disease characterised by accumulation of amyloid deposits in the extracellular space of the myocardium—comprising transthyretin (ATTR) and light chain (AL) amyloidosis as the most frequent subtypes. Histopathological proof of amyloid deposits by endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard for diagnosis of CA. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows non-invasive workup of suspected CA. We conducted a multi-centre study to assess the diagnostic value of CMR in comparison to EMB for the diagnosis of CA.

Methods

We studied N = 160 patients characterised by symptoms of heart failure and presence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy of unknown origin who presented to specialised cardiomyopathy centres in Germany and underwent further diagnostic workup by both CMR and EMB. If CA was diagnosed, additional subtyping based on EMB specimens and monoclonal protein studies in serum was performed. The CMR protocol comprised cine- and late-gadolinium-enhancement (LGE)-imaging as well as native and post-contrast T1-mapping (in a subgroup)—allowing to measure extracellular volume fraction (ECV) of the myocardium.

Results

An EMB-based diagnosis of CA was made in N = 120 patients (CA group) whereas N = 40 patients demonstrated other diagnoses (CONTROL group). In the CA group, N = 114 (95%) patients showed a characteristic pattern of LGE indicative of CA. In the CONTROL group, only 1/40 (2%) patient showed a “false-positive” LGE pattern suggestive of CA. In the CA group, there was no patient with elevated T1-/ECV-values without a characteristic pattern of LGE indicative of CA. LGE-CMR showed a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 98% for the diagnosis of CA. The combination of a characteristic LGE pattern indicating CA with unremarkable monoclonal protein studies resulted in the diagnosis of ATTR-CA (confirmed by EMB) with a specificity of 98% [95%-confidence interval (CI) 92–100%] and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 99% (95%-CI 92–100%), respectively. The EMB-associated risk of complications was 3.13% in this study—without any detrimental or persistent complications.

Conclusion

Non-invasive CMR shows an excellent diagnostic accuracy and yield regarding CA. When combined with monoclonal protein studies, CMR can differentiate ATTR from AL with high accuracy and predictive value. However, invasive EMB remains a safe invasive gold-standard and allows to differentiate CA from other cardiomyopathies that can also cause LV hypertrophy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-020-01771-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.