Early Single-Site Experience With Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement

A decade's summary of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is the most common pathology for the tricuspid valve. Moderate to severe TR is associated with morbidity and adverse outcomes. The concept that TR resolves on its own if the underlying disease is successfully treated has proven to be false. Only a few patients with significant TR are deemed suitable for surgery. Given the late presentation of patients with high perioperative risks and substantial perioperative mortality, the development of transcatheter therapies and the experience gained with transcatheter aortic valve implantation operations have turned attention towards treating this challenging group of patients. In this article, we review the treatment options and highlight the role of transcatheter valve therapies in patients with severe TR.

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Valvular Heart Disease: A Comprehensive Exploration of Equipment, Efficacy, Gender, Racial, and Socioeconomic Disparities, and Future Prospects

The 2 primary components of valvular heart disease are mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is an advanced, minimally invasive procedure that has recently displayed encouraging outcomes in the treatment of these pathologies. TEER offers a nonsurgical alternative for individuals diagnosed with conditions deemed to be high-risk surgical candidates. Currently, the TEER procedure employs devices such as MitraCLIP and TriCLIP, as well as innovative PASCAL (transcatheter valve repair system used for mitral and tricuspid valve repair) and FORMA (repair system used for tricuspid valve repair) repair systems. In the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial enrolling 614 patients to test the efficacy of TEER in MR, a significant reduction in hospitalization due to heart failure was observed at 24 months in the MitraClip + guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) group (35.8%) than in the GDMT-alone group (67.9%), HR, 0.53; P < 0.001, lower rate of all-cause mortality at 29.1% compared with 46.1% (P < 0.001), lower risk of cerebrovascular events (P = 0.001), and lower mortality due to cardiovascular events (P < 0.001). In another trial, patients with moderate TR or greater than New York Heart Association Class II or higher underwent TEER using the TriClip for the management of TR. The outcomes were encouraging, with 86% of patients showing a reduction in TR severity of at least one grade. As the technology and research surrounding TEER continue to progress, a more extensive range of patients are expected to qualify for TEER procedures. Our comprehensive review sought to extensively explore the background, equipment used, effectiveness of MR and TR, potential side effects, future prospects, and ongoing trials associated with TEER. We further discuss the existing gender, racial, and socioeconomic disparities in the realm of TEER.

Transcatheter Therapy for the Tricuspid Valve: A Focused Review of Edge-to-Edge Repair and Orthotopic Valve Replacement

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are at risk for significant morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) may offer patients less invasive treatment alternatives to surgery. This review evaluates the most common class of device currently used worldwide to treat TR, tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) and orthotopic transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR), both of which are now approved in the USA and Europe.

RECENT FINDINGS

The first pivotal randomized clinical trial, TRILUMINATE, demonstrated that T-TEER can safely reduce TR and is associated with improved health status outcomes. However, results of this trial have raised questions about whether this device can provide sufficient TR reduction to impact clinical outcomes. Orthotopic TTVR has recently gained attention with initial data suggesting near-complete TR elimination. The current review examines the technical features and anatomic limitations of the most commonly used devices for T-TEER and orthotopic TTVR, discusses the current clinical data for these devices, and offers a theoretical construct for device selection.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Screened for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: The TriACT Registry

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) abolishes tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and has emerged as a definitive treatment for TR.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this multicenter, observational study was to determine the clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of patients with TR screened for TTVR.

METHODS

Patients underwent TTVR screening at 7 centers on a compassionate-use basis. The primary endpoints were NYHA functional class and TR grade at 30-day follow-up. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, technical success, and reasons for TTVR screening failure.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients (median age 79 years [Q1-Q3: 72-84 years], 54% women) underwent TTVR screening. The TTVR screening failure rate was 74%, mainly related to large tricuspid annular diameter. Patients undergoing TTVR (n = 38) had significant functional improvements (NYHA functional class I or II from 21% to 68%; P < 0.001), with TR ≤1+ in 97% at 30-day follow-up (P < 0.001 from baseline). Technical success was achieved in 91%, with no intraprocedural mortality or conversion to surgery. At 30-day follow-up, mortality was 8%, heart failure hospitalization 5%, major bleeding 18%, and reintervention 9%. Patients who failed screening for TTVR and subsequently underwent "bailout" transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (n = 26) had favorable outcomes (NYHA functional class I or II from 27% to 58%; P < 0.001), with TR ≤1+ in 43% at 30-day follow-up (P < 0.001 from baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

This first real-world report of TTVR screening demonstrated a high screening failure rate, mainly related to large tricuspid annular diameter. Patients undergoing TTVR had superior TR reduction and symptom alleviation compared with bailout tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, at the cost of greater procedural complications.

Guidelines for the Evaluation of Prosthetic Valve Function With Cardiovascular Imaging: A Report From the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration With the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

In patients with significant cardiac valvular disease, intervention with either valve repair or valve replacement may be inevitable. Although valve repair is frequently performed, especially for mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, valve replacement remains common, particularly in adults. Diagnostic methods are often needed to assess the function of the prosthesis. Echocardiography is the first-line method for noninvasive evaluation of prosthetic valve function. The transthoracic approach is complemented with two-dimensional and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for further refinement of valve morphology and function when needed. More recently, advances in computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance have enhanced their roles in evaluating valvular heart disease. This document offers a review of the echocardiographic techniques used and provides recommendations and general guidelines for evaluation of prosthetic valve function on the basis of the scientific literature and consensus of a panel of experts. This guideline discusses the role of advanced imaging with transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance in evaluating prosthetic valve structure, function, and regurgitation. It replaces the 2009 American Society of Echocardiography guideline on prosthetic valves and complements the 2019 guideline on the evaluation of valvular regurgitation after percutaneous valve repair or replacement.

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Tricuspid Regurgitation-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has emerged as a widely accepted procedure for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) as gauged by echocardiographic parameters and clinical outcomes. Our study aims to assess TR severity and other echocardiographic outcomes in patients undergoing TEER with TriClip, MitraClip, and PASCAL devices. A literature search of 5 databases was performed until 1st June 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies with moderate to severe (grade III-V) TR patients undergoing isolated TEER were considered eligible. Echocardiographic, and quality of life determining outcomes such as improvement in TR severity grade ≥3, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥3, procedural success, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and adverse outcomes were analyzed. Grade assessment was performed and studies were assessed for risk of bias and publication bias. We included 15 studies (14 observational and 1 RCT) in our paper. Analysis revealed a substantial reduction in TR volume (P < 0.00001), TR grading (P < 0.00001), tricuspid annular diameter (P < 0.00001), proximal isovelocity surface area radius (P < 0.00001), effective regurgitant orifice area (P < 0.00001), and improvement in NYHA class (P < 0.00001) at 30 days from baseline, postprocedurally. A significant increase in 6MWD at 1 year (P = 0.001) was also recorded. No significant differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.87), fractional area change (P = 0.37), or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (P = 0.76) were observed. TEER procedural success was 97%. TEER produced a significant reduction in TR grade and volume, NYHA class, 6MWD, and showed prominent procedural success. Large scale RCTs comparing the TEER devices are needed to strengthen the present findings.

Lead management in patients undergoing percutaneous tricuspid valve replacement or repair: a 'heart team' approach

Clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has historically been managed with either medical therapy or surgical interventions. More recently, percutaneous trans-catheter tricuspid valve (TV) replacement and tricuspid trans-catheter edge-to-edge repair have emerged as alternative treatment modalities. Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have an increased incidence of TR. Severe TR in this population can occur for multiple reasons but most often results from the interactions between the CIED lead and the TV apparatus. Management decisions in patients with CIED leads and clinically significant TR, who are undergoing evaluation for a percutaneous TV intervention, need careful consideration as a trans-venous lead extraction (TLE) may both worsen and improve TR severity. Furthermore, given the potential risks of 'jailing' a CIED lead at the time of a percutaneous TV intervention (lead fracture and risk of subsequent infections), consideration should be given to performing a TLE prior to a percutaneous TV intervention. The purpose of this 'state-of-the-art' review is to provide an overview of the causes of TR in patients with CIEDs, discuss the available therapeutic options for patients with TR and CIED leads, and advocate for including a lead management specialist as a member of the 'heart team' when making treatment decisions in patients TR and CIED leads.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions: A Triumph for Transcatheter Procedures?

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common valvular pathology, estimated to affect 1.6 million people in the United States alone. Even though guidelines recommend either medical therapy or surgical treatment for TR, the misconception of TR as a benign disease along with the high mortality rates of surgical intervention led to undertreating this disease and commonly describing it as a "forgotten" valve. Recently, the development of transcatheter interventions for TR show promising potential for use in the clinical setting. There are currently few approved and numerous tested percutaneously delivered devices, which can be categorized, based on their mechanism of action, to either valve repair or valve replacement procedures. Both procedures were tested in clinical trials and show an echocardiographic reduction in TR sustained for at least 1 year after the procedure, as well as symptom relief and functional improvement of the patients. Device selection should be personalized, taking into consideration the anatomy of each valve and the available options at each heart center. Moreover, appropriate patient selection and timing of the procedure are also crucial for the success of the procedure. In this review, we analyze the clinical trials available for all devices currently approved or tested, aiming to provide a comprehensive summary of the most recent evidence in the field of transcatheter TR interventions.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Interventions: Past, Present, and Future

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) etiologies include primary valve pathology or secondary (functional) regurgitation from increased hemodynamic pressure or volume on the right side of the heart. Patients with severe TR have a worse prognosis independent of all other variables. Surgical treatment for TR has mostly been limited to patients undergoing concomitant left-sided cardiac surgery. The results and durability of surgical repair or replacement are not well defined. For patients with significant and symptomatic TR, transcatheter techniques would be beneficial, but these techniques and devices have been slow to develop. Much of the delay is a result of neglect and challenges in defining the symptoms associated with TR. In addition, the anatomic and physiological aspects of the tricuspid valve apparatus present unique challenges. Several devices and techniques are in various phases of clinical investigation. This review highlights the current landscape of transcatheter tricuspid interventions and future opportunities. It is imminent that these therapies become commercially available and widely adopted to have a significant positive impact on millions of patients that have been neglected.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention: to repair or to replace?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The burden of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is high in the aging population, almost 4% in the age group over 75 have moderate or more TR. This carries a poor prognosis and an increased incidence of mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and rehospitalization in symptomatic patients with severe TR is observed. Percutaneous tricuspid valve intervention has emerged as a viable therapeutic option, with an increasingly large toolbox of both tricuspid repair and replacement devices. The optimal strategy, timing and patient selection for transcatheter intervention are yet to be determined. This review focuses on the current strengths and limitations of transcatheter tricuspid repair vs. replacement, drawing on lessons learned from surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early outcome studies have been published in the last 2 years for many of the new percutaneous tricuspid valve devices. We have summarized these results and compared them to surgical tricuspid valve repair and replacement. We found that surgical data shows a tendency to better outcome with tricuspid valve repair compared to replacement. For transcatheter interventions studies comparing repair and replacement are lacking but both interventions show good procedural success rates and are efficient in reducing the grade of tricuspid regurgitation.

SUMMARY

Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions offer a safe and effective alternative to tricuspid surgery or medical therapy. The decision between valve replacement and repair should be based on patient anatomy, operator experience and device availability until head-to-head comparison of different devices are available.

Hemodynamics of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with Lux-Valve

Objective

Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has emerged as an alternative treatment option for high-risk and inoperable patients with symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, scarce data in hemodynamic profiles were available on TTVI. In this paper, we attempt to report the hemodynamic profiles of LuX-Valve.

Methods

30 patients from July 2020 to July 2021 were enrolled in this study. The patient was diagnosed with severe symptomatic TR. The clinical, invasive hemodynamic, and echocardiographic data were collected.

Results

The surgical success rate was 100%. The cardiac index and stroke volume increased sharply from 2.42(2.27, 2.85) and 47.8(43.6, 62.0) to 3.04 ± 0.63 and 57.2 ± 14.7, respectively. With the elimination of TR and the increase of forward blood flow of the tricuspid valve, the extravascular lung water [798.0 (673.0, 1147.0) vs. 850.3 ± 376.1, P < 0.01] increased subsequently. The peak right atrium pressure decreased after Lux-Valve implantation (21.0 ± 6.4 vs. 19.4 ± 6.5, P < 0.05). On the contrary, the nadir right atrium pressure increased [10.0(8.0, 15.0) vs. 12.0(10.0, 17.0), P < 0.01]. Notably, the right atrium pressure difference dropped sharply from 9.0(5.0, 13.0) to 5.0(4.0, 8.0) after Lux-Valve implantation. There was no significant change in the pulmonary artery pressure. The right atrium volume decreased from 128(83, 188) to 91(67, 167) mL at 1 month and 107(66,157) mL at 6 months. With the remolding of the right heart chamber, the tricuspid annulus diameter shrank significantly from 42.5 ± 5.6 to 36.6 ± 6.3 mm at 1 month and 36.0 (33.0, 38.0) at 6 months.

Conclusion

Invasive right atrium pressure may act as a potential candidate for TR evaluation and procedural guidance. Elimination of TR by LuX-Valve implantation improves the cardiac output and right atrium pressure and has no significant effect on the pulmonary artery pressure even with the increment of forward blood flow, suggesting the hemodynamic superiority of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement but needs further study.

Indications, Limitations, and Development of Tricuspid Valve Interventions in Adults

Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with excessive mortality and poor outcomes regardless of the cause and associated comorbidities. Despite this clear association with mortality, tricuspid valve diseases remain undertreated. Tricuspid valve surgery, either repair or replacement, has shown little detectable survival benefit. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions have emerged as a less invasive approach to tricuspid valve diseases. They can be categorised into coaptation devices, annuloplasty devices, transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement, heterotopic caval valve implantation, and tricuspid valve-in-valve. Despite the late referral and the patient's profile, results remain fairly acceptable at least in the short term, with good procedural device success, excellent safety profile, and sustained reduction of tricuspid regurgitation for up to 1 year. Because results are limited to the mid-term, transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention durability will need to be established before broader adoption of these technologies.

Transcatheter interventions for severe tricuspid regurgitation: a literature review

The prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) increases with age, affecting 65%-85% of adults. Primary TR is caused by a congenital or acquired abnormality of the tricuspid valve apparatus (leaflets, chordae, papillary muscles, or annulus). Secondary TR is due to insufficient coaptation from dilation of tricuspid valve annulus due to the right ventricle (RV) or right atrium (RA) remodeling and increased RV pressures. Isolated TR is without increased RV pressures and is associated with atrial fibrillation. Mild TR is a benign disease. Moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation has independently been associated with increased mortality. Most of these patients are treated medically due to poor outcomes with surgical repair of isolated TR. The in-hospital mortality rate is 8.8%, and the median length of stay in hospital is 11 days resulting in higher healthcare costs. Even if the patients undergo surgical repair or replacement, available data do not show improvement in survival. With a more detailed understanding of the complex anatomy and physiology of the tricuspid valve and significant complications from untreated tricuspid valve disease, the approach to the management of TR has shifted from a conservative approach to a process of prevention and intervention. In the past decade, transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions and tricuspid annuloplasty rings have been developed, contributing to decreased mortality from surgical repair. Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention techniques have improved survival, quality of life, and reduced heart failure rehospitalization. This review summarizes normal anatomy, types of TR, etiology and different mechanisms of TR, echocardiographic assessment of the severe TR, and highlights various percutaneous transcatheter techniques for tricuspid valve repair.

Tricuspid Valve Percutaneous Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we have focused on the currently available transcatheter tricuspid valve therapies, device selection, as well as role and management of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in the setting of other transcatheter valvular procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we have enlisted the recently finished as well as ongoing trials in the percutaneous tricuspid valve therapies. TR is highly prevalent yet remains underrecognized and is often untreated. TR has traditionally been managed conservatively with medical therapies including diuretics for volume management, whereas surgical therapies are reserved for those undergoing left-sided valvular surgery. Although the transcatheter devices for tricuspid repair and replacement are in clinical trials, the experience to date for their effectiveness and safety has been reassuring.

Transcatheter treatment of tricuspid and mitral regurgitation. Similar path, different stages

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is frequently detected, especially in its secondary form, while primary TR is far less frequent. Similar to mitral regurgitation (MR), primary tricuspid regurgitation should require timely intervention to avoid secondary damage of the RV, which is associated with poor outcome. Current guidelines suggest that secondary TR should be treated at the time of left-sided valve surgery, although a surgical option is rarely offered to high-risk patients with combined heart valve disease. As such, while the transcatheter approach to mitral valve repair/replacement has become a major goal of the transcatheter therapies, the transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention is still at a very early stage. In this review, we provide an overview of the different stages of technical and clinical evolution of transcatheter treatment of patients with TR or MR, highlighting the challenges and the avenues for future research.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapy: From Anatomy to Intervention

Nowadays, severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (TR) affects millions of persons worldwide. However, the benefit of surgical correction of isolated secondary TR remains controversial because of the increased risk of periprocedural mortality and morbidity. In recent years, novel transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) were developed to treat TR, so that TTVI is currently considered in symptomatic, inoperable, anatomically eligible patients. TTVI can be divided into these five domains: edge-to-edge leaflet repair, tricuspid annuloplasty, caval implants, spacer, and total valve replacement. Each transcatheter intervention needs specific imaging protocols for assessing the anatomical feasibility and consequentially predicting the procedural success. This review summarizes the available multimodality imaging tools for screening patients with TR, and identifies anatomical characteristics to choose the best option for the patient.

Right ventricle dysfunction assessment for transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: A matter of debate

Newer approaches in transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) have recently showed optimistic data of efficacy and safety in patients at high risk for surgery. However, the absence of residual regurgitation (and subsequently higher likelihood for developing afterload mismatch) with TTVR compared with transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention may become a critical concern if RV dysfunction is misdiagnosed. Indeed, such sudden increase in afterload on the right ventricle (RV) may not be tolerable, resulting in higher risk of acute right heart failure in the early postoperative period. In this context, strain imaging may find a further application to provide a more comprehensive stratification of the severity of RV dysfunction and thus help to better define the eligibility criteria and timing for TTVR. Meanwhile, it is of paramount importance to underline the contribution given by the Trivalve study on the understanding of the role of RV function in TTVI, that so far was largely undefined, being evaluated only in small noncontrolled cohorts.

Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease

Approximately 4% of subjects aged 75 years or more have clinically relevant tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Primary TR results from anatomical abnormality of the tricuspid valve apparatus and is observed in only 8-10% of the patients with tricuspid valve disease. Secondary TR is more common and arises as a result of annular dilation caused by right ventricular enlargement and dysfunction as a consequence of pulmonary hypertension, often caused by left-sided heart disease or atrial fibrillation. Irrespective of its aetiology, TR leads to volume overload and increased wall stress, both of which negatively contribute to detrimental remodelling and worsening TR. This vicious circle translates into impaired survival and increased heart failure symptoms in patients with and without reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Interventions to correct TR are underutilised in daily clinical practice owing to increased surgical risk and late patient presentation. The recently introduced transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions aim to address this unmet need. Dedicated expertise and an interdisciplinary Heart Team evaluation are essential to integrate these new techniques successfully and select patients. The present article proposes a standardised approach to evaluate patients with TR who may be candidates for transcatheter interventions. In addition, a state-of-the-art review of the available transcatheter therapies, the main criteria for patient and device selection, and information concerning the remaining uncertainties are provided.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions: Current devices and associated evidence

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common finding in patients with chronic cardiopathy, and often a marker of an advanced disease. Being silent or with symptoms intertwined with the primitive left heart disease, TR has often been neglected, leading to the late referral of patients with advanced right-heart failure. Hence, isolated tricuspid surgery has been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, the worse of all valve interventions, and medical management has been limited to symptomatic treatment. In this context, percutaneous therapies for severe TR have gained traction, addressing the unmet therapeutic gap for a less invasive disease-modifying management. The aim of this review is to provide an updated overview on transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions, focusing on devices' characteristics, associated evidence, and future perspectives.

Rediscovered and Unforgotten: Transcatheter Interventions for the Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation

Tricuspid valve regurgitation is both globally prevalent and undertreated. Historically, surgical intervention for isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was avoided despite the prevalence of TR, largely due to poor surgical outcomes and an incomplete understanding of how it independently affects mortality. Over the past two decades, TR has been shown by several studies to be an independent predictor of worse functional status and poor survival on long-term follow-up. During this same time period, transcatheter interventions for the treatment of valvular heart disease have evolved dramatically. While the transcatheter repair and replacement of the tricuspid valve in patients with severe TR remains in the early stages of investigation relative to the mitral or aortic valve, the field is rapidly expanding. Here, the authors review the field of transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions for severe TR, focusing on the orthotropic devices and valves currently available worldwide.

Mitral and Tricuspid Valves Percutaneous Repair in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: Panacea, or Pandora's Box?

In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the interventional landscape has recently expanded. New transcatheter approaches are emerging for both mitral and tricuspid secondary (functional) regurgitation. Transcatheter therapies for mitral and tricuspid valve require a more tailored approach than for the aortic valve, because of more heterogeneous clinical scenarios, anatomic features, and mechanisms of valvular lesions.

Early Multinational Experience of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement for Treating Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this registry was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of transcatheter tricuspid valve implantation (TTVI) in patients with extreme surgical risk.

BACKGROUND

Isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) surgery is associated with high in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients (mean age 75 ± 10 years; 56% women) from 10 institutions, with symptomatic functional TR, had institutional and notified body approval for compassionate use of the GATE TTVI system. Baseline, discharge, and 30-day follow-up echocardiographic data and procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up clinical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

At baseline, all patients had multiple comorbidities, severe or greater TR, and reduced baseline right ventricular function. Technical success was achieved in 26 of 30 patients (87%). Device malpositioning occurred in 4 patients, with conversion to open heart surgery in 2 (5%). Of those who received the device, 100% had reductions in TR of ≥1, and 75% experienced reductions of ≥2 grades, resulting in 18 of 24 of patients (76%) with mild or less TR at discharge. All patients had mild or less central TR. There was continued improvement in TR grade between discharge and 30 days in 15 of 19 patients (79%). In-hospital mortality was 10%. At mean follow-up of 127 ± 82 days, 4 patients (13%) had died. Of patients alive at follow-up, 62% were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, with no late device-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Compassionate treatment of severe, symptomatic functional TR using a first-generation TTVI device is associated with significant reduction in TR and improvement in functional status with acceptable in-hospital mortality. Further studies are needed to determine the appropriate patient population and long-term outcomes with TTVI therapy.

[Current technologies in interventional treatment of tricuspid valve regurgitation]

For a long time, severe tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) was an underestimated disease, especially in the older population and was associated with high morbidity and mortality. Due to the high perioperative mortality of tricuspid valve surgery, historically only pharmaceutical treatment was a practical treatment option. In the first studies interventional approaches could achieve promising results with an effective reduction of TR with simultaneous proof of a convincing safety profile. Conceptually, the currently available interventional treatment options can be divided into three concepts: coaptation systems (edge-to-edge repair), annuloplasty and interventional valve replacement. The largest clinical experience and best scientific body of evidence could so far be generated in the field of coaptation systems. Very promising preliminary results with effective reduction of TR and improvement of the clinical symptoms are, however, also available for interventional valve replacement. Meticulous preprocedural diagnostics with selection of the most suitable treatment option for each individual patient is paramount for successful treatment in this critically ill patient cohort. Future prospective randomized studies will investigate the net benefit of an interventional treatment of TR in comparison to a purely conservative treatment concept.

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Treatment of Tricuspid Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a frequent disease with a progressive increase in mortality as disease severity increases. Transcatheter therapies for treatment of TR may offer a safe and effective alternative to surgery in this high-risk population.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this report was to study the 1-year outcomes with the TriClip transcatheter tricuspid valve repair system, including repair durability, clinical benefit and safety.

METHODS

The TRILUMINATE trial (n = 85) is an international, prospective, single arm, multicenter study investigating safety and performance of the TriClip Tricuspid Valve Repair System in patients with moderate or greater TR. Echocardiographic assessment was performed by a core laboratory.

RESULTS

At 1 year, TR was reduced to moderate or less in 71% of subjects compared with 8% at baseline (p < 0.0001). Patients experienced significant clinical improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I/II (31% to 83%, p < 0.0001), 6-minute walk test (272.3 ± 15.6 to 303.2 ± 15.6 meters, p = 0.0023) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score (improvement of 20 ± 2.61 points, p < 0.0001). Significant reverse right ventricular remodeling was observed in terms of size and function. The overall major adverse event rate and all-cause mortality were both 7.1% at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair using the TriClip device was found to be safe and effective in patients with moderate or greater TR. The repair itself was durable at reducing TR at 1 year and was associated with a sustained and marked clinical benefit with low mortality after 1 year in a fragile population that was at high surgical risk. (TRILUMINATE Study With Abbott Transcatheter Clip Repair System in Patients With Moderate or Greater TR; NCT03227757).

Computed tomography imaging needs for novel transcatheter tricuspid valve repair and replacement therapies

Transcatheter tricuspid valve therapies are an emerging field in structural heart interventions due to the rising number of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation and the high risk for surgical treatment. Computed tomography (CT) allows exact measurements of the annular plane, evaluation of adjacent structures, assessment of the access route, and can also be used to identify optimal fluoroscopic projection planes to enhance periprocedural imaging. This review provides an overview of current transcatheter tricuspid valve repair and replacement therapies and to what extent CT can support these interventions.

Outcomes of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention by right ventricular function: a multicentre propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has a poor prognosis and limited treatment options and is frequently accompanied by right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) to reduce TR have been shown to be safe and feasible with encouraging early results. Patient selection for TTVI remains challenging, with the role of right ventricular (RV) function being unknown.

AIMS

The aims of this study were 1) to investigate survival in a TTVI-treated patient population and a conservatively treated TR population, and 2) to evaluate the outcome of TTVI as compared to conservative treatment stratified according to the degree of RV function.

METHODS

We studied 684 patients from the multicentre TriValve cohort (TTVI cohort) and compared them to 914 conservatively treated patients from two tertiary care centres. Propensity matching identified 213 pairs of patients with severe TR. As we observed a non-linear relationship of RV function and TTVI outcome, we stratified patients according to tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to preserved (TAPSE >17 mm), mid-range (TAPSE 13-17 mm) and reduced (TAPSE <13 mm) RV function. The primary outcome was one-year all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

TTVI was associated with a survival benefit in patients with severe TR when compared to matched controls (one-year mortality rate: 13.1% vs 25.8%; p=0.031). Of the three RV subgroups, only in patients with mid-range RV function was TTVI associated with an improved survival (p log-rank 0.004). In these patients, procedural success was associated with a reduced hazard ratio for all-cause mortality (HR 0.22; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

TTVI is associated with reduced mortality compared to conservative therapy and might exert its highest treatment effect in patients with mid-range reduced RV function.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention: Current Perspective

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) adversely impacts both quality of life and long-term survival, which generates interest in therapeutic approaches to mitigate these effects. Historically, therapeutic options for TR were limited to surgical approaches, which are often complicated by significant morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. This gap in therapeutic options led to the rapid evolution of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI), with a wide variety of approaches pursued and early results suggesting that TTVI improves clinical outcomes. Numerous strategies, including edge-to-edge repair, annular reduction, spacers, caval valve implantation, and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement form the basis of TTVI today. In this review, the authors discuss the current state of each approach.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair and replacement: a landscape review of current techniques and devices for the treatment of tricuspid valve regurgitation

Background and ObjectiveTricuspid regurgitation is a prevalent and undertreated cardiac pathology impacting millions across the globe. While historically surgical interventions for isolated tricuspid regurgitation were largely avoided due to data citing poor surgical outcomes, advances in transcatheter techniques and imaging modalities have reframed the approach to tricuspid valve disease in promising new ways.MethodsHere we sought to provide a landscape review of the current state of the field for transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions. We first start with a descriptive overview of the tricuspid valve, reviewing the anatomy, imaging characteristics, and the current guidelines for tricuspid interventions. We then review both transcatheter valve repair and valve replacement modalities, highlighting the devices, techniques, and valves currently under investigation, summarizing available outcomes data for each modality when possible.Results and ConclusionOur aim in writing this landscape review is the create an all-encompassing, up-to-date resource for clinicians to refer to when seeking to learn about the current state of transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions. We also hope to highlight the exciting promise of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement in appropriate patients, and review the valves currently under development for use in the tricuspid position.

Patient selection, procedural planning and interventional guidance for transcatheter aortic valve intervention

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established treatment for severe aortic stenosis across a broad spectrum of patient risk profiles. Pre-procedural planning using multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is a fundamental component to ensure acute and long-term procedural success. MSCT can establish the procedural feasibility, the type vascular of approach as well as the device which is more likely to give a good result. Moreover, MSCT is a key tool to estimate the risk of potentially life-threatening complications. In this review, the role of MSCT for pre-procedural TAVR planning will be discussed providing a panoramic overview of the key elements that should be considered when performing TAVR. Additionally, the adjunctive role of fluoroscopy and echocardiography to plan and guide a TAVR procedure will also be discussed.

Update on Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement Therapies

Severe tricuspid regurgitation is relatively common, especially in the elderly, and portends poor survival. Neither medical therapy nor conventional surgery is efficacious for most patients. In contrast, transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions are showing promise to improve quality of life and mortality. Although there is more clinical experience with transcatheter tricuspid valve repair, there are many patients for which repair is either not possible or cannot optimally reduce the severity of tricuspid regurgitation. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement is rapidly emerging and may ultimately become the preferred treatment option. In this review, we discuss transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement, analyze the devices in development and in clinical trials, and highlight the advantages and drawbacks of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement vs. repair.

Transfemoral Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement With the EVOQUE System: A Multicenter, Observational, First-in-Human Experience

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this observational first-in-human experience was to investigate the feasibility and safety of the EVOQUE tricuspid valve replacement system and its impact on short-term clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter tricuspid intervention is a promising option for selected patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Although transcatheter leaflet repair is an option for some, transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) may be applicable to a broader population.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with severe TR underwent EVOQUE TTVR in a compassionate-use experience. The primary outcome was technical success, with NYHA (NYHA) functional class, TR grade, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events assessed at 30-day follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients (mean age 76 ± 3 years, 88% women) were at high surgical risk (mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score 9.1 ± 2.3%), with 96% in NYHA functional class III or IV. TR etiology was predominantly functional, with mean tricuspid annular diameter of 44.8 ± 7.8 mm and mean tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion of 16 ± 2 mm. Technical success was 92%, with no intraprocedural mortality or conversion to surgery. At 30-day follow-up, mortality was 0%, 76% of patients were in NYHA functional class I or II, and TR grade was ≤2+ in 96%. Major bleeding occurred in 3 patients (12%), 2 patients (8%) required pacemaker implantation, and 1 patient (4%) required dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This first-in-human experience evaluating EVOQUE TTVR demonstrated high technical success, acceptable safety, and significant clinical improvement. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm durability and safety and the impact on long-term clinical outcomes.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve implantation with the Cardiovalve system

Historically considered the 'forgotten valve', there has been increasing attention on the percutaneous transcatheter treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Prevalence of TR is high in the elderly population and prior studies have shown worse outcomes in patients with severe TR. Advances in transcatheter-based therapies have shed a new light in the treatment of TR and one such treatment option is tricuspid valve replacement with the Cardiovalve system. This device is approved as an early feasibility study in the US and also approved for clinical study in Germany, Italy and Switzerland. The Cardiovalve device is in the early stage of clinical studies and this article reviews the existing clinical data and future studies on percutaneous transcatheter treatment of severe TR.

New Percutaneous Options for Tricuspid Intervention: How to Identify the Good Clinical Candidate

The tricuspid valve has been neglected for a long time and severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was largely undertreated in the past due to a high operative risk. In the last years we observed the development of different less invasive percutaneous options to treat TR. Currently, percutaneous treatments are reserved for high-risk patients presenting with advanced stage disease by which time they are likely to derive a partial benefit at best. There is a limited evidence base, including no randomized trials, to guide the management strategy for severe TR. In the interim we feel that choosing the best device for the most appropriate clinical candidate and with an adequate timing (most probably an “earlier” timing) will be the key combination to improve early and late outcomes of percutaneous treatments.

Transcatheter therapies for severe tricuspid regurgitation. Quo vadis?

Moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is common and is associated with a poor prognosis. To date, most patients are undertreated; therefore, transcatheter options could be clinically impactful in those who are denied surgery. Several transcatheter solutions have been developed that address the problem via leaflet enhancement, annuloplasty, or heterotopic implantation of self-expandable or balloon-expandable valves in the caval veins. A comprehensive patient evaluation, based on multimodality imaging techniques for a better understanding of the valvular pathology and TR mechanism, remains paramount for an appropriate device selection. To date, several trials have shown the feasibility and safety of a multitude of devices in this setting, but data from randomized clinical trials regarding clinical benefit based on hard endpoints are still lacking. Although the optimal patient profile and timing of intervention remain under investigation, data from available studies indicate that an earlier treatment referral, before onset of irreversible right ventricular remodeling, could be beneficial. This review discusses the present landscape and future implications of transcatheter therapies for severe TR.

Mitral and Tricuspid Transcatheter Interventions Current Indications and Future Directions

Valvular heart disease is responsible for a high rate of morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly population. With the emergence of new transcatheter treatment options, the therapeutic spectrum for patients with valvular heart disease has considerably expanded during the past years. Interventional treatment of the mitral and tricuspid valve requires an individualized and versatile approach owing to the different etiologies of valvular dysfunction and the complex anatomy of the atrioventricular valves. This article aims to review recent developments, summarize the evidence, indications and limitations of the available systems, and provide a glimpse into the future of transcatheter interventions for the treatment of mitral and tricuspid valve disease.

Imaging and Patient Selection for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions

With the emergence of transcatheter solutions for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) increased attention has been directed to the once neglected tricuspid valve (TV) complex. Recent studies have highlighted new aspects of valve anatomy and TR etiology. The assessment of valve morphology along with quantification of regurgitation severity and RV function pose several challenges to cardiac imagers guiding transcatheter valve procedures. This review article aims to give an overview over the role of modern imaging modalities during assessment and treatment of the TV.

Aetiology and outcomes of severe right ventricular dysfunction

Aims

Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is an important determinant of functional status and survival in various diseases states. Data are sparse on the epidemiology and outcome of patients with severe RVD. This study examined the characteristics, aetiology, and survival of patients with severe RVD.

Methods and results

Retrospective study of consecutive patients with severe RVD diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) between 2011 and 2015 in a single tertiary referral institution. Patients with prior cardiac surgery, mechanical assist devices, and congenital heart disease were excluded. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. In 64 728 patients undergoing TTE, the prevalence of ≥mild RVD was 21%. This study focused on the cohort of 1299 (4%) patients with severe RVD; age 64 ± 16 years; 61% male. The most common causes of severe RVD were left-sided heart diseases (46%), pulmonary thromboembolic disease (18%), chronic lung disease/hypoxia (CLD; 17%), and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH; 11%). After 2 ± 2 years of follow-up, 701 deaths occurred, 66% within the first year of diagnosis. The overall probability of survival at 1- and 5 years for the entire cohort were 61% [95% confidence interval (CI) 58–64%] and 35% (95% CI 31–38%), respectively. In left-sided heart diseases, 1- and 5-year survival rates were 61% (95% CI 57–65%) and 33% (95% CI 28–37%), respectively; vs. 76% (95% CI 68–82%) and 50% (95% CI 40–59%) in PAH, vs. 71% (95% CI 64–76%) and 49% (95% CI 41–58%) in thromboembolic diseases, vs. 42% (95% CI 35–49%) and 8% (95% CI 4–15%) in CLD (log-rank P &lt; 0.0001). Presence of ≥moderate tricuspid regurgitation portended worse survival in severe RVD.

Conclusion

One-year mortality of patients with severe RVD was high (∼40%) and dependent on the aetiology of RVD. Left-sided heart diseases is the most common cause of severe RVD but prognosis was worst in CLD.

Advances in transcatheter mitral and tricuspid therapies

BACKGROUND

While rheumatic mitral stenosis has been effectively treated percutaneously for more than 20 years, mitral and tricuspid regurgitation treatment appear as a contemporary unmet need. The advent of transcatheter therapies offer new treatment options to often elderly and frail patients at high risk for open surgery. We aimed at providing an updated review of fast-growing domain of transcatheter mitral and tricuspid technology.

MAIN BODY

We reviewed the existing literature on mitral and tricuspid transcatheter therapies. Mitraclip is becoming an established therapy for secondary mitral regurgitation in selected patients with disproportionately severe regurgitation associated with moderate left ventricle dysfunction. Evidence is less convincing for primary mitral regurgitation. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement is a promising emerging alternative to transcatheter repair, for secondary as well as primary mitral regurgitation. But further development is needed to improve delivery. Transcatheter tricuspid intervention arrives late after similar technologies have been developed for aortic and mitral valves and is currently at its infancy. This is likely due in part to previously under-recognized impact of tricuspid regurgitation on patient outcomes. Edge-to-edge repair is the most advanced transcatheter solution in development. Data on tricuspid annuloplasty and replacement is limited, and more research is warranted.

CONCLUSION

The future appears bright for transcatheter mitral therapies, albeit their place in clinical practice is yet to be clearly defined. Tricuspid transcatheter therapies might address the unmet need of tricuspid regurgitation treatment.

[Transcatheter Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation]

Transcatheter Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Abstract. Severe tricuspid regurgitation can lead to increased morbidity and mortality due to clinical symptoms and impairment of organ function. With the emergence of new interventional treatment options, the once neglected tricuspid valve is receiving increased attention. The following article intends to provide an overview of the causes, diagnostic modalities, and therapeutic options of severe tricuspid regurgitation.

[Transcatheter treatment of tricuspid regurgitation]

Tricuspid regurgitation is serious disease for which surgical correction is underperformed because of a prohibitive risk. It is responsible for a 50% mortality at 3 years which is decreased by surgical treatment. However, only a negligible proportion of patients undergoes surgery. In this context, there is currently an unmet need for percutaneous treatment technique. Several technologies are undergoing preclinical or early clinical development. These techniques aim to mimic the different surgical strategies used for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation. Thus, some target the leaflets, the tricuspid annulus or offer a complete tricuspid valve replacement. Before planning a transcatheter tricuspid intervention, a comprehensive evaluation is mandatory, addressing the patient clinical status and comorbidities, the tricuspid regurgitation ad its consequences on right heart and, the anatomy of the tricuspid annulus and the right heart to determine if the patient is eligible for the chosen technique. This article will review the indications, contraindications and exams to perform before transcatheter tricuspid intervention and will then detail the different strategies available or undergoing development.

Uncertainties and challenges in surgical and transcatheter tricuspid valve therapy: a state-of-the-art expert review

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a frequent and complex problem, commonly combined with left-sided heart disease, such as mitral regurgitation. Significant TR is associated with increased mortality if left untreated or recurrent after therapy. Tricuspid regurgitation was historically often disregarded and remained undertreated. Surgery is currently the only Class I Guideline recommended therapy for TR, in the form of annuloplasty, leaflet repair, or valve replacement. As growing experience of transcatheter therapy in structural heart disease, many dedicated transcatheter tricuspid repair or replacement devices, which mimic well-established surgical techniques, are currently under development. Nevertheless, many aspects of TR are little understood, including the disease process, surgical or interventional risk stratification, and predictors of successful therapy. The optimal treatment timing and the choice of proper surgical or interventional technique for significant TR remain to be elucidated. In this context, we aim to highlight the current evidence, underline major controversial issues in this field and present a future roadmap for TR therapy.

Collapse