Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Does it Matter?

Sudden cardiac death in the adolescent population: a narrative review

Background

Death from unexpected circulatory arrest within 60 min of onset of symptom is known as sudden cardiac death (SCD). In spite of the advancement in treatment and prevention strategies, SCD remains the most common cause of death worldwide especially in the young.

Main body

This review focuses on highlighting how different cardiovascular diseases contribute to SCD. We discuss the clinical symptoms that the patient experience prior to sudden cardiac arrest and the treatment strategies including pharmacological and surgical treatment.

Conclusions

We conclude that since there are many causes of SCD and very few treatment options, prevention strategies, early detection, and resuscitation of those at greatest risk is important.

Qualitative and Quantitative Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Clinical Practice: A Comprehensive Review

Stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a well-validated non-invasive stress test to diagnose significant coronary artery disease (CAD), with higher diagnostic accuracy than other common functional imaging modalities. One-stop assessment of myocardial ischemia, cardiac function, and myocardial viability qualitatively and quantitatively has been proven to be a cost-effective method in clinical practice for CAD evaluation. Beyond diagnosis, stress CMR also provides prognostic information and guides coronary revascularisation. In addition to CAD, there is a large body of literature demonstrating CMR's diagnostic performance and prognostic value in other common cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), especially coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). This review focuses on the clinical applications of stress CMR, including stress CMR scanning methods, practical interpretation of stress CMR images, and clinical utility of stress CMR in a setting of CVDs with possible myocardial ischemia.

Relation of Myocardial Perfusion Reserve and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) using vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance is increasingly used to detect coronary artery disease. However, MPR can also be altered because of changes in microvascular function. We aimed to determine whether MPR can distinguish between ischemic cardiomyopathy (IC) secondary to coronary artery disease and non-IC (NIC) with microvascular dysfunction and no underlying epicardial coronary disease. A total of 60 patients (mean age 65 ± 14 years, 30% women), including 31 with IC and 29 with NIC, were identified from a pre-existing vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance registry. Short-axis cine slices were used to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using the Simpson method of disks. MPR index (MPRi) was determined from first-pass myocardial perfusion images during stress and rest using the upslope ratio, normalized for the arterial input and corrected for rate pressure product. Patients in both groups were divided into subgroups of LVEF ≤35% and LVEF >35%. Differences in MPRi between the subgroups were examined. MPRi was moderately correlated with LVEF in patients with NIC (r = 0.53, p = 0.03), whereas the correlation in patients with IC was lower (r = 0.32, p = 0.22). Average LVEF in NIC and IC was 34% ± 8% and 35% ± 8%, respectively (p = 0.63). MPRi was not significantly different in IC compared with NIC (1.17 [0.88 to 1.61] vs 1.23 [1.07 to 1.66], p = 0.41), including the subgroups of LVEF (IC: 1.20 ± 0.56 vs NIC: 1.15 ± 0.24, p = 0.75 for LVEF ≤35% and IC: 1.35 ± 0.44 vs NIC: 1.58 ± 0.50, p = 0.19 for LVEF >35%). However, MPRi was significantly lower in patients with LVEF ≤35% compared with those with LVEF>35% (1.17 ± 0.40 vs 1.47 ± 0.47, p = 0.01). Similar difference between LVEF groups was noted in the patients with NIC (1.15 ± 0.24 vs 1.58 ± 0.50, p = 0.006) but not in the patients with IC (1.20 ± 0.56 vs 1.35 ± 0.44, p = 0.42). MPRi can be abnormal in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction with nonischemic etiology. This is a potential pitfall to consider when using this approach to detect ischemia because of epicardial coronary disease using myocardial perfusion imaging.

Relationship Between Myocardial Perfusion and Myocardial Function in Dilated Cardiomyopathy by Shown Ultrasonography

Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) were used to detect left ventricular myocardial microcirculation perfusion and myocardial systolic function in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and to explore the relationship between the two.Conventional ultrasound, MCE, and 2D-STE examinations were performed on 30 patients and 30 controls. Left ventricular microcirculation perfusion, left ventricular longitudinal strain (GLS), and circumferential strain (GCS) were analyzed to further compare the correlation between left ventricular perfusion and myocardial strain parameters.Regional myocardial perfusion was reduced in patients with DCM, manifesting as a decrease in the rising slope (A) of the mid-segment of the posterior septum, the peak intensity (PI) of the mid-segment of the anterior septum and the posterior septum, the apical segment of the lateral wall, the area under the curve (AUC) of the posterior septum, the basal segment of the posterior wall, the anterior septum, posterior septum, posterior wall, mid-segment of the lateral wall, and apical segment of the lateral wall and the overall average PI and AUC of the mid-segment, compared with that in the controls (P < 0.05). The left ventricular systolic function and the strain parameters GLS and GCS of DCM patients were lower than those of the controls (P < 0.001). Correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between the A of the mitral valve and GCS (r = 0.372, P = 0.043), and MV-E/e' had a positive correlation with the AUC of the basal and intermediate segments (r = 0.379, P = 0.039; r = 0.404, P = 0.027).In patients with DCM, regional myocardial microcirculation perfusion is reduced, and myocardial strain is impaired. Myocardial perfusion has a good positive correlation with myocardial mechanics.

Myocardial ischemia and coronary disease in heart failure

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome and represents the final path of numerous heart diseases. Coronary artery disease is recognized as the primary risk factor for heart failure development, being the main etiological factor in more than 50% of heart failure patients in North America and Europe. Regardless of overt coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia is a common finding in failing hearts, likely due to structural or functional coronary circulation alterations. Ischemia is a self-propagating process which irreversibly impairs the cardiac function and negatively impacts prognosis. Thus, a better and thorough understanding of myocardial ischemia pathophysiology in heart failure would likely lead to significantly improved outcomes in these patients. This review aims to describe the mechanisms of myocardial ischemia and coronary artery disease in heart failure, focusing on coronary circulation dysfunctions due to increased parietal stress or non-obstructive coronary disease, and discussing the association and management of coronary artery disease in patients with heart failure.