Diastolic Stress Test

Left atrium as key player and essential biomarker in heart failure

This article reviews roles of the left atrium as regulator of left ventricular filling, as compensatory reserve in left ventricular dysfunction and as diagnostic marker in patients with cardiovascular disorders. Application of novel imaging tools to assess left atrial function and their integration with conventional clinical methods are discussed. This includes a review of clinical applications of left atrial strain as a method to quantify the reservoir and booster pump components of left atrial function. Emerging methods for assessing left atrial wall stiffness and active work by pressure-strain loop analysis are discussed. Recommendations for how to apply left atrial strain in clinical routine to diagnose elevated left ventricular filling pressure are provided. Furthermore, a role for left atrial strain in the diagnostic work-up in patients suspected of pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension is proposed. The article also reviews how to implement parameters of atrial structure and function in clinical routine as recommended by recent international guidelines for imaging of heart failure.

Relationship Between Left Atrial Strain and Atrial Fibrillation: The Role of Stress Echocardiography

Interest in advanced echocardiographic imaging methods is growing. Left atrial strain (LAS) is among recently developed echocardiographic parameters. LAS represents an index of tissue deformation of the left atrium (LA). This parameter is an expression of LA function. Several arrhythmias are caused by impaired LA function. LAS can be assessed with a resting echocardiogram. The evaluation of LAS during stress echocardiography represents another model for assessing LA function. The development of altered LAS during physical or pharmacological stress is a predictor of early LA disease. Our review aims to evaluate the relationship between alterations in LAS and the development of atrial fibrillation (AF), and the diagnostic and prognostic roles of the stress echocardiogram in clinical practice.

Echocardiography in the Assessment of Heart Failure Patients

Doppler echocardiography is the corner-stone of non-invasive investigation of patients with a clinical diagnosis of heart failure. It provides an accurate and quantitative assessment of cardiac structure and function. Furthermore, spectral Doppler measurement is an invaluable technique for estimating intracardiac pressures with their crucial value in the optimum management of heart failure patients, irrespective of ejection fraction. Speckle tracking echocardiography stretches the unique application of echocardiography to analyze the myocardial deformation function which has proved very accurate in detecting ischemia, dyssynchrony, subclinical dysfunction and also in estimating pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. The role of longitudinal myocardial left atrial deformation dynamics has recently emerged as a valuable tool for assessing left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with cardiac diseases regardless of their ejection fraction. Finally, the extent of myocardial deformation has been shown to correlate with the severity of myocardial fibrosis, a common finding in patients with heart failure.

Establishing a novel model to assess exercise capacity in chronic heart failure based on stress echocardiography

AIMS

The aim of this study was to develop a simple, fast and efficient clinical diagnostic model, composed of exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) indicators, of the exercise capacity of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) by comparing the effectiveness of different classifiers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighty patients with CHF (aged 60 ± 11 years; 78% male) were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent both cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and ESE and were divided into two groups according to the VE/VCO2 slope: 30 patients with VE/VCO2 slope ventilation classification (VC)1 (i.e., VE/VCO2 slope < 30) and 50 patients with VC2 (i.e., VE/VCO2 slope ≥ 30). The analytical features of all patients in the four phases (rest, warm-up, peak and recovery phases) of ESE included the following parameters: left ventricular (LV) systolic function, LV systolic function reserve, LV diastolic function, LV diastolic function reserve and right ventricular function. Logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting trees (XGBT), classification regression tree (CART) and random forest (RF) classifiers were implemented in a K-fold cross-validation model to distinguish VC1 from VC2 (LVEF in VC1 vs. VC2: 44 ± 8% vs. 43 ± 11%, P = 0.617). Among the four models, the LR model had the largest area under the curve (AUC) (0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73 to 0.92). In the multiple-variable LR model, the differences between the peak-exercise-phase and resting-phase values of E (ΔE), s'peak and sex were strong independent predictors of a VE/VCO2 slope ≥ 30 (P value: ΔE = 0.002, s'peak = 0.005, sex = 0.020). E/e'peak, ΔLVEF, ΔLV global longitudinal strain and Δstroke volume were not predictors of VC in the multivariate LR model (P > 0.05 for the above).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the LR, XGBT, CART and RF models, the LR model performed best at predicting the VE/VCO2 slope category of CHF patients. A score chart was created to predict VE/VCO2 slopes ≥ 30. ΔE, s'peak and sex are independent predictors of exercise capacity in CHF patients.

Diastolic Stress Echocardiography in Patients With Hypertrophy Cardiomyopathy: Association With Exercise Capacity

Diastolic dysfunction plays a major role in precipitating congestive heart failure in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). In many such patients, symptoms are unmasked only during exercise because left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is normal at rest but increase with exercise. We sought to establish whether abnormal postexercise diastolic parameters are associated with reduced exercise capacity in patients with HCM. We examined 590 patients with asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic HCM (age 54 ± 14 years, 57% men, body mass index 30 ± 6 kg/m2, 84% on β blockers) with HCM by 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography at rest and after maximal treadmill exercise echocardiography (TSE). A complete echocardiogram (including LV ejection fraction, LV thickness, LV outflow tract [LVOT] gradient, degree of mitral regurgitation) was recorded. Diastolic parameters (septal and lateral [e'] velocities of the mitral annulus, peak early [E] and late [A] mitral inflow velocity, E/A ratio, E/e', right ventricular systolic pressure [RVSP], and left atrial volume index) were recorded at rest and after TSE. Exercise functional capacity was recorded and divided into <85% or >85% of age-gender predicted metabolic equivalents (AGP-METs). After maximal exercise, 32% patients had at least moderate mitral regurgitation, mean LVOT gradient was 61 ± 59 mm Hg, E/A ratio was 1.2 ± 1.0, average E/e' ratio 12.9 ± 1.0, and peak RVSP was 36 ± 15 mm Hg. Only 42% of patients achieved >85% of AGP-METs; the mean METs was 7 ± 3. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 1.05), β-blocker use (OR 2.58), higher left atrial volume index (OR 1.02), higher peak stress LVOT gradient (LVOTG) (OR 1.06), peak stress E/e' (OR 1.04), and higher RVSP (OR 1.03) were independently associated with <85% AGP-METs achieved (all p <0.05). In conclusion, in patients with asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic HCM who underwent TSE, there is a significant and independent association between abnormal diastolic response to exercise and reduced exercise capacity in HCM. Incorporating diastolic parameters during stress echocardiography could provide incremental diagnostic utility in deciphering the exact etiology of dyspnea in such patients.

Stress Echocardiography for Assessment of Diastolic Function

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diastolic dysfunction is an important, though often underappreciated, cause for exertional dyspnea. Echocardiography enables noninvasive evaluation of diastolic function and filling pressure, but images acquired at rest may be insensitive for detection of exertional abnormalities. This review focuses on stress echocardiography to assess diastolic function, including traditional and novel techniques, with emphasis on specific patient sub-groups in whom this testing may be valuable.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging data informs patient selection for diastolic stress testing. Further, increasing literature provides considerations for performance and interpretation of diastolic metrics relevant to patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, athletes, and those with microvascular coronary dysfunction. Methods, such as speckle-tracking and multi-modality imaging, provide additional and complementary information for non-invasive diastolic assessment. This review serves as a guide to optimally utilize existing and novel techniques of stress echocardiography for diastolic assessment across a broad range of patients.

The Interplay between Severe Cirrhosis and Heart: A Focus on Diastolic Dysfunction

Background/Objectives: Cardiovascular involvement in severe cirrhosis presents diagnostic challenges and carries significant prognostic implications. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between liver disease severity and portal hypertension with the burden of diastolic dysfunction. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients with hepatic cirrhosis, classified according to the Child-Pugh criteria. Of the 102 patients included, 65 were classified as Group A (non-severe cirrhosis: Child-Pugh Classes A and B) and 37 as Group B (severe cirrhosis: Child-Pugh Class C). Portal vein and spleen diameters were assessed using abdominal ultrasound. All patients underwent echocardiographic evaluation. LV systolic function was assessed by measuring ejection fraction, while diastolic function was evaluated using three parameters: E/Em ratio, E/Vp ratio, and indexed left atrial volume. Results: We observed a significantly greater burden of diastolic dysfunction in Group B compared to Group A. Specifically, the E/Vp ratio was 2.2 ± 0.4 in Group B versus 1.9 ± 0.3 in Group A (p < 0.001); the indexed LA volume was 34.5 ± 3.2 mL/m2 in Group B versus 30.1 ± 2.9 mL/m2 in Group A (p < 0.001); and the E/Em ratio was 17.0 ± 3.0 in Group B versus 11.5 ± 2.8 in Group A (p < 0.001). Additionally, the mean diameters of the portal vein and spleen were larger in Group B, with measurements of 14.3 ± 2.1 mm versus 11.5 ± 1.6 mm for the portal vein and 15.0 ± 1.2 mm versus 11.7 ± 1.5 mm for the spleen (p < 0.001), which correlated with the extent of diastolic dysfunction. Conclusions: Diastolic dysfunction was prevalent in 55% of patients with liver cirrhosis. The burden of diastolic dysfunction was higher in patients with severe hepatic cirrhosis compared to those with milder forms, and it correlated with the severity of portal hypertension, as assessed by measuring portal vein diameter and spleen diameter.

Interpreting Diastolic Dynamics and Evaluation through Echocardiography

In patients with heart failure, evaluating left ventricular (LV) diastolic function is vital, offering crucial insights into hemodynamic impact and prognostic accuracy. Echocardiography remains the primary imaging modality for diastolic function assessment, and using it effectively requires a profound understanding of the underlying pathology. This review covers four main topics: first, the fundamental driving forces behind each phase of normal diastolic dynamics, along with the physiological basis of two widely used echocardiographic assessment parameters, E/e' and mitral annulus early diastolic velocity (e'); second, the intricate functional relationship between the left atrium and LV in patients with varying degrees of LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD); third, the role of stress echocardiography in diagnosing LVDD and the significance of echocardiographic parameter changes; and fourth, the clinical utility of evaluating diastolic function from echocardiography images across diverse cardiovascular care areas.

Prognostic Significance of Elevated Left Ventricular Filling Pressures with Exercise: Insights from a Cohort of 14,338 Patients

BACKGROUND

Exercise echocardiography can assess for cardiovascular causes of dyspnea other than coronary artery disease. However, the prevalence and prognostic significance of elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressures with exercise is understudied.

METHODS

We evaluated 14,338 patients referred for maximal symptom-limited treadmill echocardiography. In addition to assessment of LV regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs), we measured patients' early diastolic mitral inflow (E), septal mitral annulus relaxation (e'), and peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity before and immediately after exercise.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 3.4 years, patients with E/e' ≥15 with exercise (n = 1,323; 9.2%) had lower exercise capacity (7.3 ± 2.1 vs 9.1 ± 2.4 metabolic equivalents, P < .0001) and were more likely to have resting or inducible RWMAs (38% vs 18%, P < .0001). Approximately 6% (n = 837) had elevated LV filling pressures without RWMAs. Patients with a poststress E/e' ≥15 had a 2.71-fold increased mortality rate (2.28-3.21, P < .0001) compared with those with poststress E/e' ≤ 8. Those with an E/e' of 9 to 14, while at lower risk than the E/e' ≥15 cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58 [0.48-0.69]; P < .0001), had higher risk than if E/e' ≤8 (HR = 1.56 [1.37-1.78], P < .0001). On multivariable analysis, adjusting for age, sex, exercise capacity, LV ejection fraction, and presence of pulmonary hypertension with stress, patients with E/e' ≥15 had a 1.39-fold (95% CI, 1.18-1.65, P < .0001) increased risk of all-cause mortality compared with patients without elevated LV filling pressures. Compared with patients with E/e' ≤ 15 after exercise, patients with E/e' ≤15 at rest but elevated after exercise had a higher risk of cardiovascular death (HR = 8.99 [4.7-17.3], P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with elevated LV filling pressures are at increased risk of death, irrespective of myocardial ischemia or LV systolic dysfunction. These findings support the routine incorporation of LV filling pressure assessment, both before and immediately following stress, into the evaluation of patients referred for exercise echocardiography.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: New challenges and new hopes

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem affecting millions of adults worldwide. HF with preserved ejection fraction, i.e. > 50 %, (HFpEF) accounts for more than half of all HF cases, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing with the aging of the population and the growing prevalence of metabolic disorders such as obesity, diabetes and hypertension. Diagnosis of HFpEF requires a combination of numerous echocardiographic parameters and also results of natriuretic peptide assays, to which may be added the need for a stress test. HFpEF is characterized by complex, interrelated pathophysiological mechanisms, which must be understood. This complexity probably accounts for the lack of evidence-based medicine compared with HF with reduced EF. Nevertheless, significant progress has been made recently, with a high level of evidence obtained for the SGLT2 inhibitor class on the one hand, and promising data with new drugs targeting more specifically certain mechanisms such as obesity and inflammation on the other.

Mitral E-wave to stroke volume ratio displays stronger diagnostic performance to identify elevated left ventricular filling pressures than mitral E/e' during passive leg lift: A cross-sectional study employing simultaneous echocardiography and catheterization

BACKGROUND

Elevated filling pressure is a hallmark of heart failure (HF) and portends poor prognosis. Accurate diagnosis is challenging, given that patients with normal filling pressure at rest develop disproportionate elevation with sudden preload increase. We aimed to test the accuracy of the ratio between mitral inflow velocity (E) and left ventricular stroke volume (SV) to identify patients with elevated filling pressure with passive leg lifting (PLL) and compare this with other echocardiographic surrogates of filling pressure.

METHODS

Doppler echocardiography and right heart catheterization (RHC) were simultaneously performed in 37 patients (11 males, mean age 67 ± 12 years) with exertional dyspnea. Twenty-six healthy controls (14 males, mean age 60 ± 12 years) were added as reference. SV, cardiac output (CO), tricuspid regurgitation peak gradient (TRG), mitral E-wave (E) and early myocardial velocity (e') were obtained at rest and with PLL. E/SV, E/CO and E/e' were calculated and correlated with invasive pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (PCWP) with PLL.

RESULTS

During PLL, E/SV (AUC = 0.94) displayed stronger diagnostic ability to identify PCWP >15 mmHg than E/e' (AUC = 0.81), mitral E/A ratio (0.76) and resting invasive PCWP (0.84). An E/SV cutoff of >1.0 showed 88% sensitivity and 75% specificity to identify elevated PCWP. Further, 10 patients (27%) were reassigned during PLL from normal to postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (postCPH), and 6 patients (16%) switched diagnosis from precapillary PH (preCPH) to postCPH.

CONCLUSION

The novel E/SV ratio identifies patients with elevated PCWP with PLL and displays stronger diagnostic performance than routinely utilized echocardiographic measures such as E/e' in addition to resting, catheterization derived PCWP.

Comprehensive diagnostic workup in patients with suspected heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) can be challenging and it could require different tests, some of which are affected by limited availability. Nowadays, considering that new therapies are available for HFpEF and related conditions, a prompt and correct diagnosis is relevant. However, the diagnostic role of biomarker level, imaging tools, score-based algorithms and invasive evaluation, should be based on the strengths and weaknesses of each test. The aim of this review is to help the clinician in diagnosing HFpEF, overcoming the diagnostic uncertainty and disentangling among the different underlying causes, in order to properly treat this kind of patient.

Current Insights and Future Directions in the Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome associated with poor quality of life, substantial healthcare resource utilization, and premature mortality, in large part related to high rates of hospitalizations. The clinical manifestations of heart failure are similar regardless of the ejection fraction. Unlike heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, there are few therapeutic options for treating heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Molecular therapies that have shown reduced mortality and morbidity in heart failure with reduced ejection have not been proven to be effective for patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. The study of pathophysiological processes involved in the production of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is the basis for identifying new therapeutic means. In this narrative review, we intend to synthesize the existing therapeutic means, but also those under research (metabolic and microRNA therapy) for the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Prevalence and incidence of diastolic dysfunction in atrial fibrillation: clinical implications

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are intimately associated disorders; HFpEF may be overlooked in AF when symptoms are simply attributed to dysrhythmia, and incident AF may identify patients at risk for developing diastolic dysfunction (DD). This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and incidence of DD in patients with new-onset AF compared with sinus rhythm (SR).

METHODS

Adults with new-onset AF (n = 1747) or SR (n = 29 623) and no structural heart disease were identified. Propensity score matching was performed (1:3 ratio) between AF and SR based on age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities. Severe DD (SDD) was defined by ≥3/four abnormal parameters (medial e', medial E/e', tricuspid regurgitation velocity, and left atrial volume index) and ≥moderate DD (>MDD) by ≥2/4. Annualized changes in DD indices were determined.

RESULTS

New-onset AF was independently associated with SDD (8% vs. 3%) and ≥MDD (25% vs. 16%); 62% of patients with AF had high-risk H2FPEF scores, and 5% had clinically recognized HFpEF. Over a median follow-up of 3.2 (interquartile range 1.6-5.8) years, DD progressed two-four-fold more rapidly in those with new-onset AF (P < .001 for all). The risk for incident DD was increased in new-onset AF [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.69 (2.19-3.32) for SDD and 1.73 (1.49-2.02) for ≥MDD].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with new-onset AF display high-risk features for HFpEF at diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of evaluating for HFpEF among symptomatic patients with AF. Patients with new-onset AF have accelerated progression in DD over time, which may identify patients with preclinical HFpEF, where preventive therapies may be tested.

Abnormal left ventricular systolic reserve function detected by treadmill exercise stress echocardiography in asymptomatic type 2 diabetes

Aims

Subclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction may occur in T2DM patients at the early asymptomatic stage, and LV reserve function is a sensitive index to detect subtle LV dysfunction. The purpose of our study is (1) to assess the LV reserve function using treadmill exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in asymptomatic type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients; (2) to explore the link of serum biological parameters and LV reserve function.

Methods

This study included 84 patients with asymptomatic T2DM from September 2021 to July 2022 and 41 sex- and age-matched healthy controls during the corresponding period. All subjects completed treadmill ESE, LV systolic function-related parameters such as global longitudinal strain (GLS) and systolic strain rate (SRs), as well as diastolic function-related parameters such as E wave (E), early diastolic velocity (e'), E/e' ratio, early diastolic SR (SRe), and late diastolic SR (SRa) were compared at rest and immediately after exercise. The difference between LV functional parameters after treadmill exercise and its corresponding resting value was used to compute LV reserve function. In addition, the associations of LV reserve function and serum biological parameters were analyzed.

Results

Patients with T2DM did not significantly vary from the controls in terms of alterations in LV diastolic reserve measures, the changes of LVGLS and SRs (ΔGLS: 2.19 ± 2.72% vs. 4.13 ± 2.79%, P < 0.001 and ΔSRs:0.78 ± 0.33 s-1 vs. 1.02 ± 0.28 s-1, P < 0.001) in the T2DM group were both lower than those in the control group. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), waist circumference, and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were identified as independent predictors of LV systolic reserve by stepwise multiple linear regression analysis.

Conclusion

LV systolic reserve function, as measured by pre- and post-exercise differences in GLS and SRs were significantly impaired in patients with asymptomatic T2DM, whereas diastolic reserve remained normal during exercise and was comparable to that of the control group. This was different from previous findings. High levels of HbA1c, NTproBNP, hsCRP, and increasing waist circumference were independent predictors of LV systolic reserve.

Phenotyping heart failure by echocardiography: imaging of ventricular function and haemodynamics at rest and exercise

Traditionally, congestive heart failure (HF) was phenotyped by echocardiography or other imaging techniques according to left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF). The more recent echocardiographic modality speckle tracking strain is complementary to LVEF, as it is more sensitive to diagnose mild systolic dysfunction. Furthermore, when LV systolic dysfunction is associated with a small, hypertrophic ventricle, EF is often normal or supernormal, whereas LV global longitudinal strain can reveal reduced contractility. In addition, segmental strain patterns may be used to identify specific cardiomyopathies, which in some cases can be treated with patient-specific medicine. In HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), a diagnostic hallmark is elevated LV filling pressure, which can be diagnosed with good accuracy by applying a set of echocardiographic parameters. Patients with HFpEF often have normal filling pressure at rest, and a non-invasive or invasive diastolic stress test may be used to identify abnormal elevation of filling pressure during exercise. The novel parameter LV work index, which incorporates afterload, is a promising tool for quantification of LV contractile function and efficiency. Another novel modality is shear wave imaging for diagnosing stiff ventricles, but clinical utility remains to be determined. In conclusion, echocardiographic imaging of cardiac function should include LV strain as a supplementary method to LVEF. Echocardiographic parameters can identify elevated LV filling pressure with good accuracy and may be applied in the diagnostic workup of patients suspected of HFpEF.

The Importance of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract and Mid-Ventricular Gradients in Stress Echocardiography: A Narrative Review

This review aims to serve as a guide for clinical practice and to appraise the current knowledge on exercise stress echocardiography in the evaluation of intraventricular obstruction in HCM, in patients with cardiac syndrome X, in athletes with symptoms related to exercise, and in patients with normal left ventricular systolic function and exercise-related unexplained tiredness. The appearance of intraventricular obstruction while exercising is considered rare, and it usually occurs in patients with hypertrophy of the left ventricle. The occurrence of intraventricular obstruction when exercising has been evidenced in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, athletes, patients with cardiac syndrome X, patients with syncope or dizziness related to exercise, and patients with dyspnea and preserved ejection fraction. The clinical significance of this observation and the exercise modality that is most likely to trigger intraventricular obstruction remains unknown. Supine exercise and lying supine after exercise are less technically demanding, but they are also less physiologically demanding than upright exercise. Importantly, in everyday life, human beings generally do not become supine after exercise, as takes place in post-exercise treadmill stress echocardiograms in most echocardiography labs. The presence of induced intraventricular obstruction might be considered when patients have exercise-related symptoms that are not understood, and to assess prognosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Role of Exercise Stress Echocardiography in Pulmonary Hypertension

Resting and exercise right heart catheterisation is the gold standard method to diagnose and differentiate types of pulmonary hypertension (PH). As it carries technical challenges, the question arises if non-invasive exercise stress echocardiography may be used as an alternative. Exercise echocardiography can unmask exercise PH, detect the early stages of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, and, therefore, differentiate between pre- and post-capillary PH. Regardless of the underlying aetiology, a developed PH is associated with increased mortality. Parameters of overt right ventricle (RV) dysfunction, including RV dilation, reduced RV ejection fraction, and elevated right-sided filling pressures, are detectable with resting echocardiography and are associated with worse outcome. However, these measures all fail to identify occult RV dysfunction. Echocardiographic measures of RV contractile reserve during exercise echocardiography are very promising and provide incremental prognostic information on clinical outcome. In this paper, we review pulmonary haemodynamic response to exercise, briefly describe the modalities for assessing pulmonary haemodynamics, and discuss in depth the contemporary key clinical application of exercise stress echocardiography in patients with PH.

Imaging in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multimodality Imaging Point of View

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is an important global health problem. Despite increased prevalence due to improved diagnostic options, limited improvement has been achieved in cardiac outcomes. HFpEF is an extremely complex syndrome and multimodality imaging is important for diagnosis, identifying its different phenotypes and determining prognosis. Evaluation of left ventricular filling pressures using echocardiographic diastolic function parameters is the first step of imaging in clinical practice. The role of echocardiography is becoming more popular and with the recent developments in deformation imaging, cardiac MRI is extremely important as it can provide tissue characterisation, identify fibrosis and optimal volume measurements of cardiac chambers. Nuclear imaging methods can also be used in the diagnosis of specific diseases, such as cardiac amyloidosis.

Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Definition and Diagnosis

The Korean Society of Heart Failure guidelines aim to provide physicians with evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and managing patients with heart failure (HF). In Korea, the prevalence of HF has been rapidly increasing in the last 10 years. HF has recently been classified into HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). Moreover, the availability of newer therapeutic agents has led to an increased emphasis on the appropriate diagnosis of HFpEF. Accordingly, this part of the guidelines will mainly cover the definition, epidemiology, and diagnosis of HF.

Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Definition and Diagnosis

The Korean Society of Heart Failure guidelines aim to provide physicians with evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and managing patients with heart failure (HF). In Korea, the prevalence of HF has been rapidly increasing in the last 10 years. HF has recently been classified into HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF), HF with mildly reduced EF, and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). Moreover, the availability of newer therapeutic agents has led to an increased emphasis on the appropriate diagnosis of HFpEF. Accordingly, this part of the guidelines will mainly cover the definition, epidemiology, and diagnosis of HF.

Role of Echocardiography in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: From Mechanisms to Clinical Practice

It has been well established that diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered as a core risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases. However, what is less appreciated is the fact that DM may affect cardiac function irrespective of cardiac pathologies to which it contributes, such as coronary artery disease and hypertension. Although echocardiography provides accurate and reproducible diagnostic and prognostic data in patients with DM, its use in these patients is still underappreciated, resulting in progression of DM-related heart failure in many patients. Hence, in the present review, we aimed to discuss the role of echocardiography in the contemporary management of diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), as well as the role of emerging echocardiographic techniques, which may contribute to earlier diagnosis and more appropriate management of this complication of DM. In order to improve outcomes, focus must be placed on early diagnosis of this condition using a combination of echocardiography and emerging biomarkers, but perhaps the more important thing is to change perspective when it comes to the clinical importance of DCM.

Additive prognostic and diagnostic value of diastolic exercise parameters in patients referred for exercise echocardiography

AIMS

Exercise echocardiography (ExE) may evaluate left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function. We aimed to assess the value of diastolic parameters at exercise [early LV inflow velocity to early tissue Doppler annulus velocity (E/e')] in patients with normal or abnormal resting diastolic function (DF) referred for a clinically indicated ExE.

METHODS AND RESULTS

LV systolic and DF according to ASE/EACVI guidelines and mitral regurgitation (MR) were evaluated at rest in 772 patients (age 67 ± 12 years) with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%). We assessed regional/global LV systolic function at peak exercise, while MR and E/e' where evaluated in the immediate post-exercise period. Abnormal ExE was defined as ischaemia or fixed wall motion abnormalities, and raised E/e' values as >15 at rest and at exercise (e' at the septal level). Patients were grouped as complaining or not of dyspnoea. Events were overall mortality, myocardial infarction, admission for unstable angina or cardiac failure, and coronary revascularization. DF was abnormal at rest in 221 patients (29%) and indeterminate in 77 (10%), with similar percentages in patients with and without dyspnoea. Exercise E/e' >15 was found in 37% of patients with abnormal DF, 21% with indeterminate DF, and 6% with normal DF (P < 0.001). Patients with abnormal ExE had more often abnormal resting DF (39% vs. 25%, P = 0.001) and exercise E/e' >15 (25% vs. 13%, P < 0.001) than those with normal ExE. During a median follow-up of 1.68 years, there were 132 events. Independent predictors included peak exercise LVEF [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.91-0.94, P < 0.001], and exercise E/e' (HR= 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.07, P = 0.01). Neither resting E/e' values nor resting abnormal DF by ASE/EACVI guidelines, were independent predictors. Annualized event-rates were 43.2% in patients with (+) ExE plus (+) exercise E/e', 23.8% in those with (+) ExE and (-) exercise E/e', 7.9% in (-) ExE and (+) exercise E/e', and 3.6% with both variables normal.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of diastolic dysfunction at rest and at exercise were similar between patients with or without dyspnoea referred for ExE, but they were associated with abnormal ExE. Exercise E/e' reclassified 21% of patients with indeterminate DF and further predicted outcome on top of ExE results.

Left ventricular dysfunction with preserved ejection fraction: the most common left ventricular disorder in chronic kidney disease patients

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for premature cardiovascular disease. As kidney function declines, the presence of left ventricular abnormalities increases such that by the time kidney replacement therapy is required with dialysis or kidney transplantation, more than two-thirds of patients have left ventricular hypertrophy. Historically, much research in nephrology has focussed on the structural and functional aspects of cardiac disease in CKD, particularly using echocardiography to describe these abnormalities. There is a need to translate knowledge around these imaging findings to clinical outcomes such as unplanned hospital admission with heart failure and premature cardiovascular death. Left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac fibrosis, which are common in CKD, predispose to the clinical syndrome of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF). There is a bidirectional relationship between CKD and HFpEF, whereby CKD is a risk factor for HFpEF and CKD impacts outcomes for patients with HFpEF. There have been major improvements in outcomes for patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction as a result of several large randomized controlled trials. Finding therapy for HFpEF has been more elusive, although recent data suggest that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition offers a novel evidence-based class of therapy that improves outcomes in HFpEF. These observations have emerged as this class of drugs has also become the standard of care for many patients with proteinuric CKD, suggesting that there is now hope for addressing the combination of HFpEF and CKD in parallel. In this review we summarize the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic strategies and treatment of HFpEF with a focus on patients with CKD.

Left Ventricular Diastolic Response to Isometric Handgrip Exercise in Physically Active and Sedentary Individuals

Aims: This study aims to investigate the diastolic left ventricular (LV) response to isometric handgrip exercise among healthy middle-aged men with high physical activity levels, versus matched sedentary individuals. Methods: Two groups of 10 men aged 41−51 years were studied. Men in the first group had high weekly self-reported physical activity levels (>3000 METs × min/week). In comparison, men in the second group reported low physical activity levels (<300 METs × min/week). An isometric handgrip exercise (IHE) stress echocardiography test was performed in all of them. Results: Both groups showed a similar and statistically significant increase in heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure following IHE. The group of active men under study did not show a statistically significant change in the ratio of early diastolic mitral valve inflow velocity to early diastolic lateral wall tissue velocity (E/e’ ratio) in response to IHE. Conversely, the inactive participants’ E/e’ ratio was higher at peak activity in the isometric handgrip exercise. Conclusions: Apparently, healthy middle-aged men with high levels of physical activity seem to have an improved lusitropic cardiac function compared to men with low levels of physical activity, as observed by the different diastolic LV responses induced by isometric handgrip exercise.

Associations between Subclinical Myocardial Dysfunction and Premature Fusion of Early and Late Diastolic Filling with Uncertain Cause

PURPOSE

The fusion of early (E) and late diastolic filling (A) on mitral inflow Doppler, even in the absence of tachycardia, is often found during assessment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function. We evaluated the echocardiographic characteristics and clinical implications of premature E-A fusion of uncertain cause in the absence of tachycardia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 1014 subjects who showed E-A fusion and normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF) between January 2019 and June 2021 at two tertiary hospitals. Among these, 105 (10.4%) subjects showed premature E-A fusion at heart rates less than 100 beats per minute (bpm). The conventional echocardiographic parameters and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) were compared with 1:1 age-, sex-, and heart rate-matched controls without E-A fusion.

RESULTS

The premature E-A fusion group had a heart rate of 96.4±3.7 bpm. Only 4 (3.8%) subjects were classified as having LV diastolic dysfunction according to current guidelines. The group showed prolonged isovolumic relaxation time (107.2±25.3 msec vs. 61.6±15.6 msec, p<0.001), increased Tei index (0.76±0.19 vs. 0.48±0.10, p<0.001), lower LVEF (63.8±7.0% vs. 67.3±5.6%, p<0.001) and lower absolute LV GLS (|LV GLS|) (17.0±4.2% vs. 19.7±3.3%, p<0.001) than controls. As the E-A fusion occurred at lower heart rate, the |LV GLS| was also lower (p for trend=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Premature E-A fusion at heart rates less than 100 bpm is associated with subclinical LV dysfunction. Time-based indices and LV GLS are helpful for evaluating this easily overlooked population.

Phenotyping the hypertensive heart

Arterial hypertension remains the most frequent cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, and is responsible for a huge global burden of disease. Echocardiography is the first-line imaging method for the evaluation of cardiac damage in hypertensive patients and novel techniques, such as 2D and D speckle tracking and myocardial work, provide insight in subclinical left ventricular (LV) impairment that would not be possible to detect with conventional echocardiography. The structural, functional, and mechanical cardiac remodelling that are detected with imaging are intermediate stages in the genesis of CV events, and initiation or intensification of antihypertensive therapy in response to these findings may prevent or delay progressive remodelling and CV events. However, LV remodelling—especially LV hypertrophy—is not specific to hypertensive heart disease (HHD) and there are circumstances when other causes of hypertrophy such as athlete heart, aortic stenosis, or different cardiomyopathies need exclusion. Tissue characterization obtained by LV strain, cardiac magnetic resonance, or computed tomography might significantly help in the distinction of different LV phenotypes, as well as being sensitive to subclinical disease. Selective use of multimodality imaging may therefore improve the detection of HHD and guide treatment to avoid disease progression. The current review summarizes the advanced imaging tests that provide morphological and functional data about the hypertensive cardiac injury.

Factors associated with the intermediate probability of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction on the H₂FPEF score in asymptomatic patients in rotation work conditions in the Arctic

Aim. To study the factors associated with the intermediate probability of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) according to the H2FPEF score (Heavy; Hypertensive; Atrial Fibrillation; Pulmonary Hypertension; Elder; Filling Pressure) in asymptomatic patients in rotation work conditions in the Arctic.

Material and methods. In the polar village of Yamburg (68° 21’ 40” northern latitude), 100 men and 80 women with grade 1, 2 hypertension and normotensive persons were examined on the basis of the Medical Unit of OOO Gazprom Dobycha Yamburg. All patients underwent echocardiography using generally accepted methods of imaging and data processing, according to European Society of Echocardiography guidelines. To calculate the probability of HFpEF, the H2FPEF score was used. The Bruce protocol treadmill test was performed. The SF-36 (Health Status Survey) questionnaire for assessment of life quality was used.

Results. Group 1 included 95 male and female patients with a low probability of HF (H2FPEF score — 0-1), group 2 — 85 patients of both sexes with an intermediate probability of HF (H2FPEF score — 2-5). Group 2 patients were older (p=0,038), worked longer on a shift (p=0,0143), and had higher ambulatory systolic (p=0,0001) and diastolic blood pressure (p=0,0013) with a higher body mass index (BMI) (p=0,0001). Based on the odds ratio (OR) analysis, the factor most strongly influencing the intermediate probability of HFpEF was BMI (OR=1,261, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1,140-1,393). SF-36 questionnaire revealed intergroup differences only on the role functioning scale (p=0,013) with lower values in group 2. In the logistic regression model, dyspnea during the treadmill test occupied a leading position as follows: OR=8,952; 95% CI: 3,454-15,197 (p<0,0001). The second place was taken by inotropic reserve value (OR=1,020; 95% CI: 1,006-1,035 (p=0,005), which was higher in group 2 and was regarded as one of the compensatory mechanisms for adapting to stress. In the group 2, echocardiography revealed significant differences in terms of left ventricular (LV) myocardial mass (p=0,0002), LV internal area (p=0,0002), isovolumic relaxation time (p=0,003), and ratio of transmitral diastolic flow rate to mean mitral annulus velocity (p=0,0001), which indirectly indicates the presence of LV diastolic dysfunction.

Conclusion. There are following factors associated with H2FPEF intermediate probability of HFpEF in asymptomatic patients on shift in the Arctic: BMI, length of shift, dyspnea and an increase in inotropic reserve during exercise due to a decrease in adaptive potential, impaired LV diastolic function. Initiating management strategies that target identified factors in patients with asymptomatic HF may slow symptomatic disease progression in shift workers in the Arctic region.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Dyspnea-Suspected Cardiac Origin (Ischemia Already Excluded): 2021 Update

Dyspnea is the symptom of perceived breathing discomfort and is commonly encountered in a variety of clinical settings. Cardiac etiologies of dyspnea are an important consideration; among these, valvular heart disease (Variant 1), arrhythmia (Variant 2), and pericardial disease (Variant 3) are reviewed in this document. Imaging plays an important role in the clinical assessment of these suspected abnormalities, with usually appropriate procedures including resting transthoracic echocardiography in all three variants, radiography for Variants 1 and 3, MRI heart function and morphology in Variants 2 and 3, and CT heart function and morphology with intravenous contrast for Variant 3. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Peak atrio-ventricular mechanics predicts exercise tolerance in heart failure patients

PURPOSE

Exercise intolerance is a cardinal symptom of patients with heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in comparison with those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have disproportionate exercise-induced impairment of left atrial (LA) function that may explain the effort intolerance.

METHODS

Total 40 HFpEF patients, 40 HFrEF patients, and 20 matched healthy controls underwent resting and exercise stress transthoracic echocardiography using modified Bruce protocol with speckle-tracking derived assessments of peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS).

RESULTS

In comparison to controls, PALS and LVGLS were reduced in HFpEF and HFrEF patients (P < 0.01); however, the strain magnitudes were significantly lower in HFrEF than in HFpEF (P < 0.01). Both HFpEF and HFrEF showed a 28% and 30% reduction in exercise time in comparison with controls (HFpEF, 363 ± 152, HFrEF 352 ± 91, controls, 505 ± 42 s, P < 0.01) and exercise-related rise in E/E' in HFpEF patients. However, during exercise PALS reduced from resting values by 26% (resting 23.1 ± 4.7 and peak 18.5 ± 3.5, P < 0.01) in HFpEF but only 8% in HFrEF (resting 11.5 ± 1.4 and peak 10.5 ± 1.5, P < 0.01), and remained unchanged in controls (resting 34 ± 1.9 and peak 34.4 ± 1.2, P = 0.4). Regression analysis of the combined data from the HF patients and controls revealed that PALS was independently associated with exercise time such that a 1% reduction in PALS was associated with a 10 s reduction in exercise duration (p < 0.01). PALS at baseline and peak exercise differentiated normal from HF patients. LVGLS at baseline and peak exercise differentiated HFpEF from HFrEF and patients of HFpEF showed abnormality of both PALS and LVGLS.

CONCLUSION

Although left ventricle and LA strain are lower in HFrEF than HFpEF at rest and exercise compared to healthy controls, patients with HFpEF show more profound deterioration of LA reservoir function with exercise which appears to contribute to exercise intolerance.

Exercise Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate hemodynamic correlates of inducible blood pressure (BP) pulsatility with exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), to identify relationships to outcomes, and to compare this with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

BACKGROUND

In HFpEF, determinants and consequences of exercise BP pulsatility are not well understood.

METHODS

We measured exercise BP in 146 patients with HFpEF who underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Pulsatile BP was evaluated as proportionate pulse pressure (PrPP), the ratio of pulse pressure to systolic pressure. We measured pulmonary arterial catheter pressures, Fick cardiac output, respiratory gas exchange, and arterial stiffness. We correlated BP changes to central hemodynamics and cardiovascular outcome (nonelective cardiovascular hospitalization) and compared findings with 57 patients with HFrEF from the same referral population.

RESULTS

In HFpEF, only age (standardized beta = 0.593; P < 0.001), exercise stroke volume (standardized beta = 0.349; P < 0.001), and baseline arterial stiffness (standardized beta = 0.182; P = 0.02) were significant predictors of peak exercise PrPP in multivariable analysis (R = 0.661). In HFpEF, lower PrPP was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events, despite adjustment for confounders (HR:0.53 for PrPP below median; 95% CI: 0.28-0.98; P = 0.043). In HFrEF, lower exercise PrPP was not associated with arterial stiffness but was associated with lower peak exercise stroke volume (P = 0.013) and higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In HFpEF, greater inducible BP pulsatility measured using exercise PrPP reflects greater arterial stiffness and higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, in contrast to HFrEF where inducible exercise BP pulsatility relates to stroke volume reserve and favorable outcome.

Exercise Systolic Reserve and Exercise Pulmonary Hypertension Improve Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Aims

Diastolic stress testing (DST) is recommended to confirm heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with exertional dyspnea, but current algorithms do not detect all patients. We aimed to identify additional echocardiographic markers of elevated pulmonary arterial wedge pressure during exercise (exPAWP) in patients referred for DST.

Methods and Results

We identified candidate parameters in 22 patients referred for exercise right heart catheterization with simultaneous echocardiography. Elevated exPAWP (≥25 mmHg) was present in 14 patients, and was best identified by peak septal systolic annular velocity <9.5 cm/s [exS', area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.92–1.0] and mean pulmonary artery pressure/cardiac output slope ≥3.2 mmHg/L [mPAP/CO, AUC 0.88 (0.72–1.0)]. We propose a decision tree to identify patients with elevated exPAWP. Applying this decision tree to 326 patients in an independent non-invasive DST cohort showed that patients labeled as “high probability of HFpEF” (n = 85) had reduced peak oxygen uptake [13.0 (10.7–15.1) mL/kg/min, p < 0.001 vs. intermediate/low probability], high H2FPEF score [53 (40–72) %, p < 0.001 vs. intermediate/low probability], and typical clinical characteristics. The diagnostic yield of DST increased from 11% using exercise E/e', to 62% using the decision tree.

Conclusion

In DST for suspected HFpEF, exS' was the most accurate echocardiographic parameter to identify elevated PAWP. We propose a decision tree including exS' and mPAP/CO for interpretation of DST. Application of this decision tree revealed typical HFpEF characteristics in patients labeled as high probability of HFpEF, and substantially reduced the number of inconclusive results.

Arterial Hypertension and Cardiopulmonary Function: The Value of a Combined Cardiopulmonary and Echocardiography Stress Test

Arterial hypertension (AH) is a global burden and the leading risk factor for mortality worldwide. Haemodynamic abnormalities, longstanding neurohormonal and inflammatory activation, which are commonly observed in patients with AH, promote cardiac structural remodeling ultimately leading to heart failure (HF) if blood pressure values remain uncontrolled. While several epidemiological studies have confirmed the strong link between AH and HF, the pathophysiological processes underlying this transition remain largely unclear. The combined cardiopulmonary-echocardiography stress test (CPET-ESE) represents a precious non-invasive aid to detect alterations in patients at the earliest stages of HF. The opportunity to study the response of the cardiovascular system to exercise, and to differentiate central from peripheral cardiovascular maladaptations, makes the CPET-ESE an ideal technique to gain insights into the mechanisms involved in the transition from AH to HF, by recognizing alterations that might be silent at rest but influence the response to exercise. Identifications of these subclinical alterations might allow for a better risk stratification in hypertensive patients, facilitating the recognition of those at higher risk of evolution towards established HF. This may also lead to the development of novel preventive strategies and help tailor medical treatment. The purpose of this review is to summarise the potential advantages of using CPET-ESE in the characterisation of hypertensive patients in the cardiovascular continuum.

Multimodality imaging in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

Nearly half of all patients with heart failure (HF) have a normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and the condition is termed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). It is assumed that in these patients HF is due primarily to LV diastolic dysfunction. The prognosis in HFpEF is almost as severe as in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). In contrast to HFrEF where drugs and devices are proven to reduce mortality, in HFpEF there has been limited therapy available with documented effects on prognosis. This may reflect that HFpEF encompasses a wide range of different pathological processes, which multimodality imaging is well placed to differentiate. Progress in developing therapies for HFpEF has been hampered by a lack of uniform diagnostic criteria. The present expert consensus document from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) provides recommendations regarding how to determine elevated LV filling pressure in the setting of suspected HFpEF and how to use multimodality imaging to determine specific aetiologies in patients with HFpEF.

Heart Failure with Perserved Ejection Fraction Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a syndrome associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Little progress has been in the treatment of this condition since its introduction some 30 years ago. It's accepted that HFpEF is heterogeneous in many ways, ethologically and phenotypically. The underlying mechanisms of the syndrome are not clear. Recently, it has been shown that the diagnostic criteria for HFpEF lacks sensitivity and specificity. Novel treatment approaches, which were developed based on current HFpEF pathophysiological concepts, did not show either clinical or prognostic benefit for patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need to revise current diagnostic approaches and to further investigate the underlying mechanisms. Recently, two novel diagnostic score systems were proposed: H2PEF and HFA-PEFF. Recently, a number of phase II and III randomized control trials have been completed. Here, the authors discuss the potential novel diagnostic approaches to HFpEF and treatment perspectives.

Ivabradine Ameliorates Cardiac Diastolic Dysfunction in Diabetic Mice Independent of Heart Rate Reduction

Cardiac fibroblast (CF) proliferation and activation play important roles in cardiac fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction (DD), which are involved in fibrosis-associated cardiovascular diseases. A previous study showed that ivabradine, a specific heart rate (HR)-lowering agent, significantly ameliorated DD in diabetic db/db mice by reducing HR. Herein, we attempted to determine whether ivabradine has antifibrotic and cardioprotective effects in diabetic mice by directly suppressing CF proliferation and activation, independent of a reduction in HR. We found that knockdown of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) or p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), or treatment with ivabradine, reduced JNK and p38 MAPK phosphorylation and the protein expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, collagen I, collagen III, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 2, and α-smooth muscle actin, accompanied with upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase 2 both in high glucose-treated neonatal rat CFs and left ventricular CFs isolated from db/db mice. However, zatebradine (a HR-lowering agent) did not have these effects in vitro or in vivo. In addition, cardiac fibrosis and DD were ameliorated in db/db mice that were intravenously administered lentiviruses carrying short hairpin RNAs targeting JNK and p38 MAPK or administered ivabradine. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the ivabradine-induced amelioration of cardiac fibrosis, and DD in db/db mice may be at least in part attributable to the suppression of CF proliferation and activation, through the inhibition of JNK and p38 MAPK.

Characterisation of haemodynamic and metabolic abnormalities in the heart failure spectrum: the role of combined cardiopulmonary and exercise echocardiography stress test

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome characterised by different etiologies and a broad spectrum of cardiac structural and functional abnormalities. Current guidelines suggest a classification based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), distinguishing HF with reduced (HFrEF) from preserved (HFpEF) LVEF. HF should also be thought of as a continuous range of conditions, from asymptomatic stages to clinically manifest syndrome. The transition from one stage to the next is associated with a worse prognosis. While the rate of HF-related hospitalisation is similar in HFrEF and HFpEF once clinical manifestations occur, accurate knowledge of the steps and risk factors leading to HF progression is still lacking, especially in HFpEF. Precise hemodynamic and metabolic characterisation of patients with or at risk of HF may help identify different disease trajectories and risk factors, with the potential to identify specific treatment targets that might offset the slippery slope towards overt clinical manifestations. Exercise can unravel early metabolic and haemodynamic alterations that might be silent at rest, potentially leading to improved risk stratification and more effective treatment strategies. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) offers valuable aid to investigate functional alterations in subjects with or at risk of HF, while echocardiography can assess cardiac structure and function objectively, both at rest and during exercise (exercise stress echocardiography, ESE). The purpose of this narrative review is to summarise the potential advantages of using an integrated CPET-ESE evaluation in the characterisation of both subjects at risk of developing HF and patients with stable HF.

Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Two Chronic Troublemakers

In this article, the definition; mechanisms; diagnostic strategies, including scoring systems; treatments; prognosis; and future perspectives in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with atrial fibrillation, which are common comorbid conditions, are reviewed thoroughly.

Stress Testing in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Exertional dyspnea is the most common symptom in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; however, it is not specific to this disease. Stress testing provides crucial information about the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection before it reaches the advanced stage. Among various stress tests, noninvasive supine bicycle diastolic stress echocardiography has provided the most evidence for diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. In current practice guidelines, a noninvasive or invasive diastolic stress test is recommended when a diagnosis is unclear in resting echocardiography.

Update of clinical echocardiographic assessment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has an increasing global prevalence. Diastolic dysfunction is the predominant cause of symptoms, most commonly, exertional dyspnea. Although prevalent, the syndrome is challenging to identify due to the comorbid conditions that can present similarly. This paper will review established, guideline recommended, echocardiographic variables, and pathophysiology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Echocardiography is the primary diagnostic modality. The latest advances in strain analysis, algorithmic use of multiple parameters, and deeper understanding of exercise hemodynamics have improved our classification of those with HFpEF.

SUMMARY

There remains a paucity of therapies with mortality benefit in this subgroup. Thus, improving diagnostic efficacy is important as it can clarify epidemiologic, phenotypic, and pathologic features of HFpEF.

Evaluation of diastolic function in newly diagnosed hyperthyroid patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function

Background

Diastolic dysfunction has been reported as a cardiovascular effect of hyperthyroidism, and is also supposed to be a cause of heart failure manifestations in the patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF).

Methods

For evaluation of diastolic function in hyperthyroid patients and also diastolic function during performing exercise stress echocardiography, we conducted this study on 25 newly diagnosed hyperthyroid patients compared to 26 healthy subjects as control group. Diastolic function of the patients at rest was assessed using these parameters as follows: left atrium volume index, tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity, mitral inflow early diastolic flow (E wave), tissue Doppler of mitral annular velocity (e′), E/e′ ratio, and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT); and during exercise stress echocardiography, we judged diastolic response by measuring E/e′ ratio and TR velocity at the peak of stress.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 39.64 ± 12.23 years old and 52% of them were female. History of exertional dyspnea was found in 64% of patients. All the patients had normal diastolic function at the time of resting and there was no significant difference in diastolic parameters between the two groups except for IVRT, which was lower in hyperthyroid patients. Interestingly, no patients developed diastolic dysfunction during exercise stress echocardiography.

Conclusion

Our finding did not show diastolic dysfunction in hyperthyroid patients neither at rest nor during exercise echocardiography and did not support the hypothesis that diastolic dysfunction can be a cause of exertional intolerance and dyspnea in the patients with preserved EF.

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: the Major Unmet Need in Cardiology

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has recently been recognized as the single greatest unmet need in cardiovascular medicine. As the population ages and the comorbidity increases, the prevalence of HFpEF increases considerably. Even though there have been large numbers of studies on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of HFpEF for latest years, there are no current pharmacologic interventions that can reduce mortality. HFpEF is currently understood as a heterogeneous syndrome originated from the interplay of cardiac and extracardiac abnormalities recognized by systemic inflammation, endothelial and coronary microvascular dysfunction, cardiomyocyte dysfunction and skeletal muscle dysfunction. The difficult “jigsaw puzzle” called HFpEF has been filled with some pieces, but it is still not enough to meet clinical needs. Here, we review recent evidences and unsolved problems about HFpEF to improve our understanding of HFpEF. Finally, we hope to accelerate to completion of the problematic “jigsaw puzzle”.

Diastolic function assessment by echocardiography: A practical manual for clinical use and future applications

Diastole is an important component of the cardiac cycle, during which time optimum filling of the ventricle determines physiological stroke volume ejected in the succeeding systole. Many factors contribute to optimum ventricular filling including venous return, left atrial filling from the pulmonary circulation, and emptying into the left ventricle. Left ventricular filling is also impacted by the cavity emptying function and also its synchronous function which may suppress early diastolic filling in severe cases of dyssynchrony. Sub-optimum LA emptying increases cavity pressure, causes enlarged left atrium, unstable myocardial function, and hence atrial arrhythmia, even atrial fibrillation. Patients with clear signs of raised left atrial pressure are usually symptomatic with exertional breathlessness. Doppler echocardiography is an ideal noninvasive investigation for diagnosing raised left atrial pressure as well as following treatment for heart failure. Spectral Doppler based increased E/A, shortened E-wave deceleration time, increased E/e', and prolonged atrial flow reversal in the pulmonary veins are all signs of raised left atrial pressure. Left atrial reduced myocardial strain is another correlate of raised cavity pressure (>15 mm Hg). In patients with inconclusive signs of raised left atrial pressure at rest, exercise/stress echocardiography or simply passive leg lifting should identify those with stiff left ventricular which suffers raised filling pressures with increased venous return.

Diagnostic algorithm for HFpEF: how much is the recent consensus applicable in clinical practice?

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents an important cardiovascular entity with increasing prevalence and relatively high mortality. The agreement about diagnostic algorithm for HFpEF is still missing. Echocardiographic approach remains the cornerstone in HFpEF diagnosis. Echocardiographic diastolic stress test provides numerous useful parameters that correlated well with indexes obtained by cardiac catheterization. Recently published consensus recommended new scoring system that included functional and structural echocardiographic parameters, as well as biomarkers. The new score for evaluation of HFpEF introduces a new set of parameters and proposed novel cutoff values for some of them. There are several important points that need to be resolved before full acceptance and clinical usage. First, some cutoff values are new and represent the result of expert consensus, without previous validation. Second, many patients with hypertension, obesity, and diabetes would be referred for further investigations as the result of this scoring, which is difficult to achieve in clinical circumstances. Third, the consensus equalized non-invasive and invasive diastolic stress tests in diagnosing of HFpEF, which is not a small issue. Namely, even though cardiac catheterization provides the final confirmation of elevated left ventricular filling pressures, it is still an invasive method, associated with procedural risk and other limitations. The aim of this review was to summarize the current knowledge diagnosis of HFpEF, as well as the recent consensus about diagnostic algorithm in patients with suspected HFpEF with its advantages and disadvantages.