Clinical Use of CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in the Emergency Department

Late Outcomes of Patients in the Emergency Department With Acute Chest Pain Evaluated With Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve

Computed tomography (CTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) guides the need for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Late outcomes after FFRCT are reported in stable ischemic heart disease but not in acute chest pain in the emergency department (ACP-ED). The objectives are to assess the risk of death, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and ICA after FFRCT. From 2015 to 2018, 389 low-risk patients with ACP-ED (negative biomarkers, no electrocardiographic ischemia) underwent CTA and FFRCT and were entered into a prospective institutional registry; patients were followed up for 41 ± 10 months. CTA stenosis ≥50% was present in 81% of the patients. Positive (FFRCT ≤0.80) and negative FFRCT were observed in 124 (32%) and 265 patients (68%), respectively. ICA was performed in 108 of 124 patients (87%) with positive FFRCT and 89 of 265 patients (34%) with negative FFRCT (p <0.00001). Revascularization was performed in 87 of 124 (70%) patients with positive FFRCT and in 22 of 265 (8%) with negative FFRCT (p <0.00001). Appropriateness of revascularization was established by blinded adjudication of ICA and invasive FFR using practice guidelines; revascularization was appropriate in 81 of 124 (65%) and 6 of 265 (2%) of FFRCT-positive and -negative patients, respectively (p <0.00001). At follow-up, for patients with positive versus negative FFRCT, the rates were 0.8% versus 0% for death (p = 0.32) and 1.6% versus 0.4% for MI (p = 0.24). In conclusion, in low-risk patients with ACP-ED who underwent CTA and FFRCT, the risk of late death (0.2%) and MI (0.7%) are low. Negative FFRCT is associated with excellent long-term prognosis, and positive FFRCT predicts obstructive disease requiring revascularization. FFRCT can safely triage patients with ACP-ED and reduce unnecessary ICA and revascularization.

Coronary Artery Disease: Role of Computed Tomography and Recent Advances

In this review, the authors summarize the role of coronary computed tomography angiography and coronary artery calcium scoring in different clinical presentations of chest pain and preventative care and discuss future directions and new technologies such as pericoronary fat inflammation and the growing footprint of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine.

Virtual Hemodynamic Assessment of Coronary Lesions: The Advent of Functional Angiography and Coronary Imaging

The fractional flow reserve (FFR) is well recognized as a gold standard measure for the estimation of functional coronary stenosis. Technological progressions in image processing have empowered the reconstruction of three-dimensional models of the coronary arteries via both non-invasive and invasive imaging modalities. The application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques to coronary 3D anatomical models allows the virtual evaluation of the hemodynamic significance of a coronary lesion with high diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Search of the bibliographic database for articles published from 2011 to 2023 using the following search terms: invasive FFR and non-invasive FFR. Pooled analysis of the sensitivity and specificity, with the corresponding confidence intervals from 32% to 94%. In addition, the summary processing times were determined.

RESULTS

In total, 24 studies published between 2011 and 2023 were included, with a total of 13,591 patients and 3345 vessels. The diagnostic accuracy of the invasive and non-invasive techniques at the per-patient level was 89% (95% CI, 85-92%) and 76% (95% CI, 61-80%), respectively, while on the per-vessel basis, it was 92% (95% CI, 82-88%) and 81% (95% CI, 75-87%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

These opportunities providing hemodynamic information based on anatomy have given rise to a new era of functional angiography and coronary imaging. However, further validations are needed to overcome several scientific and computational challenges before these methods are applied in everyday clinical practice.

FFRct use for acute chest pain triage in the emergency department: a cost-effectiveness analysis

AIMS

To model and assess the cost-effectiveness of CT-based fractional flow reserve (FFRct) for a population of low to intermediate risk patients for coronary artery disease (CAD) presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using a decision tree model with a 1 year time horizon and from a health care perspective, two diagnostic pathways using FFRct are compared to current clinical routine combining coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with an exercise test. Model data are drawn from the literature and nationally reported data. Outcomes are assessed as the number of avoided invasive coronary angiographies (ICAs) showing no obstructive CAD and quality of life (QoL) in a theoretical cohort of 1000 patients. Sensitivity analyses are performed to test the robustness of the results. Determining FFRct when CCTA is inconclusive is a cost-effective and dominant strategy with a potential saving of 198€/patient, 154 avoided unnecessary ICA showing no obstructive CAD (uICA)/1000 patients and an average improvement in QoL of 0.008 QALY/patient. With an additional 574€/patient, 8 avoided uICA/1000 patients and an improvement in QoL of 0.001 QALY/patient, a strategy where FFRct is always performed is cost-effective only when considering high cost-effectiveness thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain and a low to intermediate pre-test probability of CAD, a diagnostic strategy where FFRct is determined after an inconclusive CCTA is cost-effective. Clinical trials investigating both sensitivity and specificity of FFRct, as well as QoL associated with the use of this technology in this setting are warranted.

Computed Tomography-Derived Physiology Assessment: State-of-the-Art Review

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) are the best non-invasive techniques to assess coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial ischemia. Advances in these technologies allow a paradigm shift to the use of CCTA and FFRCT for advanced plaque characterization and planning myocardial revascularization.

Utility of Fractional Flow Reserve Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary computed tomography angiography is a modality with high negative predictive value for evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, its diagnostic accuracy for obstructive CAD is limited by multiple factors. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) computed tomography (FFRCT) is an emerging analysis tool for identifying flow-limiting disease; nonetheless, the prognostic value of FFRCT is not well established. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the association of FFRCT with clinical outcomes in patients with stable CAD. A literature search was conducted for studies reporting the association between FFRCT measurements and all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and any need for coronary revascularization. Obstructive disease was defined as a FFR value ≤0.80; nonobstructive disease was defined as an FFR value >0.80. Ten studies were identified to meet the inclusion criteria; mean follow-up was 17 months (range, 3 to 56 months). There was no difference in risk of all-cause mortality between patients with obstructive and those with nonobstructive CAD on FFRCT. However, obstructive lesions were associated with increased risk of MACE, AMI, and any need for revascularization. FFRCT is a useful adjunctive modality for further risk stratification of patients with stable CAD. Obstructive lesions identified by FFRCT are associated with increased risk of MACE, AMI, and any need for revascularization.

Predictive value of coronary artery computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR-CT) assesses whether coronary artery lesions will result in myocardial ischemia. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of FFR-CT for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from patients with CAD who underwent FFR-CT at our hospital from January 2020 to February 2022 (1-year average follow-up). Patients were divided into ischemic (FFR-CT ≤ 0.80) and non-ischemic (FFR-CT > 0.80) groups. The incidence of endpoint events (cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, unstable angina, and stable angina) was calculated. The FFR-CT value was correlated with endpoint events using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

We recruited 134 patients (93 [69.4%] and 41 [30.6%] patients in the ischemic and non-ischemic groups, respectively). The ischemic group had a higher proportion of men, patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, and patients taking antiplatelet drugs and β‑blockers than did the non-ischemic group (all p < 0.05), whereas other parameters were comparable. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed no significant differences in cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and unstable angina between the groups. The incidence of stable angina events (hazard ratio: 3.092, 95% confidence interval: 1.362-7.022, p = 0.007) was significantly higher in the ischemic group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant difference in event-free survival for stable angina between the groups (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In patients with CAD, FFR-CT showed an independent predictive value for stable angina within 1 year of examination.

Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography in ischemia-specific coronary artery stenosis and indeterminate lesions: results from a multicenter study in China

Background

To determine the diagnostic performance of a novel computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based algorithm for in situ CT-FFR in patients with ischemia-induced coronary artery stenosis. Additionally, we investigated whether the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR differs significantly across the spectrum of disease and analyzed the influencing factors that contribute to misdiagnosis.

Methods

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and FFR were performed on 324 vessels from 301 patients from six clinical medical centers. Local investigators used CCTA and ICA to conduct assessments of stenosis, and CT-FFR calculations were performed in the core laboratory. For CCTA and ICA, CT-FFR ≤ 0.8 and a stenosis diameter ≥ 50% were identified as lesion-specific ischemia. Univariate logistic regression models were used to assess the effect of features on discordant lesions (false negative and false positive) in different CT-FFR categories. The diagnostic performance of CT-FFR was analyzed using an invasive FFR ≤ 0.8 as the gold standard.

Results

The Youden index indicated an optimal threshold of 0.80 for CT-FFR to identify functionally ischemic lesions. On a per-patient basis, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for CT-FFR were 96% (91%-98%), 92% (87%-96%), 94% (90%-96%), 91% (85%-95%), and 96% (92%-99%), respectively. The diagnostic efficacy of CT-FFR was higher than that of CCTA without the influence of calcification. Closer to the cut point, there was less certainty, with the agreement between the invasive FFR and the CT-FFR being at its lowest in the CT-FFR range of 0.7-0.8. In all lesions, luminal stenosis ≥ 50% significantly affected the risk of reduced false negatives (FN) and false positives (FP) results by CT-FFR, irrespective of the association with calcified plaque.

Conclusions

In summary, CT-FFR based on the new parameter-optimized CFD model has a better diagnostic performance than CTA for lesion-specific ischemia. The presence of calcified plaque has no significant effect on the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR and is independent of the degree of calcification. Given the range of applicability of our software, its use at a CT-FFR of 0.7-0.8 requires caution and must be considered in the context of multiple factors.

Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve on 3-year Outcomes in Patients with Stable Angina

Background The prognostic value of coronary CT angiography (CTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) beyond 1-year outcomes and in patients with high levels of coronary artery calcium (CAC) is uncertain. Purpose To assess the prognostic value of coronary CTA-derived FFR test results on 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with coronary stenosis and among a subgroup of patients with high levels of CAC. Materials and Methods This study represents a 3-year follow-up of patients with new-onset stable angina pectoris who were consecutively enrolled in the Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive CT-FFR in Coronary Care, known as ADVANCE (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02499679) registry, between December 2015 and October 2017 at three Danish sites. A high CAC was defined as an Agatston score of at least 400. A lesion-specific coronary CTA-derived FFR value of 2 cm with distal-to-stenosis value at or below 0.80 represented an abnormal test result. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death and nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction. Event rates were estimated using the one-sample binomial model, and relative risk was compared between participants stratified by results of coronary CTA-derived FFR. Results This study included 900 participants: 523 participants with normal results (mean age, 64 years ± 9.6 [SD]; 318 male participants) and 377 with abnormal results from coronary CTA-derived FFR (mean age, 65 years ± 9.6; 264 male participants). The primary end point occurred in 11 of 523 (2.1%) and 25 of 377 (6.6%) participants with normal and abnormal coronary CTA-derived FFR results, respectively (relative risk, 3.1; 95% CI: 1.6, 6.3; P < .001). In participants with high CAC, the primary end point occurred in four of 182 (2.2%) and 19 of 212 (9.0%) participants with normal and abnormal coronary CTA-derived FFR results, respectively (relative risk, 4.1; 95% CI: 1.4, 11.8; P = .001). Conclusion In individuals with stable angina, a normal coronary CTA-derived FFR test result identified participants with a low 3-year risk of all-cause death or nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction, both in the overall cohort and in participants with high CAC scores. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02499679 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sinitsyn in this issue.

Utility of FFRCT in Patients with Chest Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this article is to review the data supporting the use of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) in patients with chest pain.

REVIEW FINDINGS

Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can be improved with the use of FFRCT, primarily due to its superior specificity when compared to CCTA alone. This promising development may help reduce the need for invasive angiography in patients presenting with chest pain. Furthermore, some studies have indicated that incorporating FFRCT into decision-making is safe, with an FFRCT value of ≥ 0.8 being associated with favorable outcomes. While FFRCT has been shown to be feasible in patients with acute chest pain, further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm its utility. The emergence of FFRCT as a tool for the management of patients with chest pain is promising. However, potential limitations require the interpretation of FFRCT in conjunction with clinical context.

In search of new gatekeepers: coronary CT (Computed Tomography) in acute coronary syndrome

Coronary computed tomography (CCT) is a non-invasive imaging method that allows visualization of the epicardial coronary arteries. The diagnostic and prognostic role of CCT has been demonstrated by various randomized trials to such an extent that it has been included as a Class I, level of evidence B recommendation in the latest European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis of chronic coronary syndrome in patients at intermediate-low cardiovascular risk. In addition to the anatomical evaluation, the CCT allows to evaluate the presence of high-risk characteristics of the atherosclerotic plaque (napkin-ring sign, positive remodelling, spotty calcification, and low-attenuation plaque), thus discriminating the stability of the atheromatous pathology. Furthermore, among the potential of cardiac CT in the emergency department, the possibility of making a triple rule-out must be underlined, excluding three potential big killers as the cause of acute chest pain: acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and aortic dissection. Various randomized clinical studies have demonstrated that the prognosis of the patient with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) improves only if a haemodynamically significant stenosis is treated, generally investigated with invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR); CCT technological advances have made it possible to create an algorithm for calculating the FFR-CT, an index of haemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis, whose correlation with the invasive FFR data and, consequently, with the prognosis has been demonstrated of patients with CAD.

Outcomes of Functional Testing Versus Invasive Cardiac Catheterization for the Evaluation of Intermediate Severity Coronary Stenosis Detected on Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of functional testing in comparison to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) among acute chest pain patients whose first diagnostic modality was a coronary computed tomography angiogram (CCTA) and were found to have intermediate coronary stenosis, defined as 50%-70% luminal stenosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 4763 acute chest pain patients ≥18 years old who received a CCTA as the initial diagnostic modality. Of these, 118 patients met enrollment criteria and proceeded to either stress test (80/118) or directly to ICA (38/118). The primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiac event, consisting of acute myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, or death.

RESULTS

There was no difference in 30-day major adverse cardiac event among patients who underwent initial stress testing versus directly referred to ICA (0% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.322) following CCTA. The rate of revascularization without acute myocardial infarction was significantly higher among those who underwent ICA versus stress test [36.8% vs. 3.8%, P < 0.0001; adjusted odds ratio: 9.6, 95% confidence interval, 1.8-49.6]. Patients who underwent ICA had a higher rate of catheterization without revascularization within 30 days of the index admission in comparison to those who underwent initial stress testing (55.3% vs. 12.5%, P < 0.0001; adjusted odds ratio: 26.7, 95% confidence interval, 6.6-109.5).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with intermediate coronary stenosis on CCTA, a functional stress test compared with ICA may prevent unnecessary revascularization and improve cardiac catheterization yield without negatively affecting the 30-day patient safety profile.

2022 use of coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: An expert consensus document of the Society of cardiovascular computed tomography (SCCT): Endorsed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and North American Society for cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI)

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) improves the quality of care for patients presenting with acute chest pain (ACP) to the emergency department (ED), particularly in patients with low to intermediate likelihood of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee was formed to develop recommendations for acquiring, interpreting, and reporting of coronary CTA to ensure appropriate, safe, and efficient use of this modality. Because of the increasing use of coronary CTA testing for the evaluation of ACP patients, the Committee has been charged with the development of the present document to assist physicians and technologists. These recommendations were produced as an educational tool for practitioners evaluating acute chest pain patients in the ED, in the interest of developing systematic standards of practice for coronary CTA based on the best available data or broad expert consensus. Due to the highly variable nature of medical care, approaches to patient selection, preparation, protocol selection, interpretation or reporting that differs from these guidelines may represent an appropriate variation based on a legitimate assessment of an individual patient's needs.

Artificial intelligence in atherosclerotic disease: Applications and trends

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the most common cause of death globally. Increasing amounts of highly diverse ASCVD data are becoming available and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques now bear the promise of utilizing them to improve diagnosis, advance understanding of disease pathogenesis, enable outcome prediction, assist with clinical decision making and promote precision medicine approaches. Machine learning (ML) algorithms in particular, are already employed in cardiovascular imaging applications to facilitate automated disease detection and experts believe that ML will transform the field in the coming years. Current review first describes the key concepts of AI applications from a clinical standpoint. We then provide a focused overview of current AI applications in four main ASCVD domains: coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and carotid artery disease. For each domain, applications are presented with refer to the primary imaging modality used [e.g., computed tomography (CT) or invasive angiography] and the key aim of the applied AI approaches, which include disease detection, phenotyping, outcome prediction, and assistance with clinical decision making. We conclude with the strengths and limitations of AI applications and provide future perspectives.

Computed Tomography-Derived Physiology Assessment: State-of-the-Art Review

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) are the best non-invasive techniques to assess coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial ischemia. Advances in these technologies allow a paradigm shift to the use of CCTA and FFRCT for advanced plaque characterization and planning myocardial revascularization.

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: An Expert Consensus Document of Chinese Society of Radiology

Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured by a pressure wire is a reference standard for evaluating functional stenosis in coronary artery disease. Coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) uses advanced computational analysis methods to noninvasively obtain FFR results from a single conventional coronary computed tomography angiography data to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery disease. More and more evidence has found good correlation between the results of noninvasive CT-FFR and invasive FFR. CT-FFR has proven its potential in optimizing patient management, improving risk stratification and prognosis, and reducing total health care costs. However, there is still a lack of standardized interpretation of CT-FFR technology in real-world clinical settings. This expert consensus introduces the principle, workflow, and interpretation of CT-FFR; summarizes the state-of-the-art application of CT-FFR; and provides suggestions and recommendations for the application of CT-FFR with the aim of promoting the standardized application of CT-FFR in clinical practice.

The role of cardiac computed tomography in predicting adverse coronary events

Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) is now considered a first-line diagnostic test for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) providing a non-invasive, qualitative, and quantitative assessment of the coronary arteries and pericoronary regions. CCT assesses vascular calcification and coronary lumen narrowing, measures total plaque burden, identifies plaque composition and high-risk plaque features and can even assist with hemodynamic evaluation of coronary lesions. Recent research focuses on computing coronary endothelial shear stress, a potent modulator in the development and progression of atherosclerosis, as well as differentiating an inflammatory from a non-inflammatory pericoronary artery environment using the simple measurement of pericoronary fat attenuation index. In the present review, we discuss the role of the above in the diagnosis of coronary atherosclerosis and the prediction of adverse cardiovascular events. Additionally, we review the current limitations of cardiac computed tomography as an imaging modality and highlight how rapid technological advancements can boost its capacity in predicting cardiovascular risk and guiding clinical decision-making.

Role of CT and MRI in Cardiac Emergencies

Current strategies for the evaluation of patients with chest pain have significantly changed thanks to the implemented potentiality of CT and MRI. The possible fatal consequences and high malpractice costs of missed acute coronary syndromes lead to unnecessary hospital admissions every year. CT provides consistent diagnostic support, mainly in suspected coronary disease in patients with a low or intermediate pre-test risk. Moreover, it can gain information in the case of cardiac involvement in pulmonary vascular obstructive disease. MRI, on the other hand, has a leading role in the condition of myocardial damage irrespective of the underlying inflammatory or stress related etiology. This article discusses how radiology techniques (CT and MRI) can impact the diagnostic workflow of the most common cardiac and vascular pathologies that are responsible for non-traumatic chest pain admissions to the Emergency Department.

Synergistic prognostic value of coronary distensibility index and fractional flow reserve based cCTA for major adverse cardiac events in patients with Coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary distensibility index (CDI), as an early predictor of cardiovascular diseases, has the potential to complement coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Thus, the prognostic value of CT-FFR combined with CDI for MACEs is worth exploring.

METHODS

Patients with a moderate or severe single left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis were included and underwent FFR and CDI analysis based on cCTA, followed up at least 1 year, and recorded MACEs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of MACEs. The area under of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluated evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR, CDI, and a combination of the two.

RESULTS

All the vessel-specific data were from LAD. 150 patients were analysed. 55 (37%) patients experienced MACEs during follow-up. Patients with CT-FFR ≤ 0.8 had higher percentage of MACEs compared with CT-FFR > 0.8 (56.3% vs.7.3%, p < 0.05). Patients' CDI was significantly decreased in MACEs group compared with non-MACEs group (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that diabetes (p = 0.025), triglyceride (p = 0.015), CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 (p = 0.038), and CDI (p < 0.001) are independent predictors of MACEs. According to ROC curve analysis, CT-FFR combined CDI showed incremental diagnostic performance over CT-FFR alone for prediction of MACEs (AUC = 0.831 vs. 0.656, p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

Our study provides initial evidence that combining CDI with CT-FFR shows incremental discriminatory power for MACEs over CT-FFR alone, independent of clinical risk factors. Diabetes and triglyceride are also associated with MACEs.

Role of Coronary CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain and Suspected or Confirmed Acute Coronary Syndrome

Advances in CT technology have resulted in improved imaging of the coronary anatomy in patients with stable coronary artery disease, using coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Recent data suggest that CCTA may play a role in higher risk patients, such as those evaluated in the emergency room with acute chest pain. Data thus far support the use of CCTA in low-risk patients with acute chest pain. Recent literature suggests that CCTA may play a role in the risk stratification of selected intermediate-risk patients. In this review, the authors discuss the emerging role of CCTA in higher risk patients, such as those with suspected or confirmed acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The excellent accuracy of CCTA in detecting obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with ACS is detailed, along with a highlighting of the safety of using CCTA in this setting. The authors also discuss the role for CCTA atheromatous plaque characterization, which is being increasingly recognized as an important predictor of clinical outcomes.

CT Fractional Flow Reserve: A Practical Guide to Application, Interpretation, and Problem Solving

CT fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) is a physiologic simulation technique that models coronary flow from routine coronary CT angiography (CTA). To evaluate lesion-specific ischemia, FFR_CT is measured 2 cm distal to a stenotic lesion. FFR_CT greater than 0.8 is normal, 0.76-0.8 is borderline, and 0.75 or less is abnormal. FFR_CT should always be interpreted in correlation with clinical and anatomic coronary CTA findings. FFR_CT increases the specificity of coronary CTA in the evaluation of coronary artery disease, decreases the prevalence of nonobstructive disease in invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and helps with revascularization decisions and planning. Patients with intermediate-risk coronary anatomy at CTA and abnormal FFR_CT can undergo ICA and revascularization, whereas those with normal FFR_CT can be safely deferred from ICA. In borderline FFR_CT values, management is decided in the context of the clinical scenario, but many cases could be safely managed with medical treatment. There are some limitations and pitfalls of FFR_CT. Abnormal FFR_CT values can be seen in mild stenosis, and normal FFR_CTvalues can be seen in severe stenosis. Gradually decreasing or abnormal low FFR_CT values at the distal vessel without a proximal focal lesion could be due to diffuse atherosclerosis. Coronary stents, bypass grafts, coronary anomalies, coronary dissection, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, unstable angina, and acute or recent myocardial infarction are situations in which FFR_CT has not been validated and should not be used at this time. The authors provide a practical guide to the applications and interpretation of FFR_CT, focusing on common pitfalls and challenges. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

One-year outcomes of CCTA alone versus machine learning-based FFRCT for coronary artery disease: a single-center, prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To explore downstream management and outcomes of machine learning (ML)-based CT derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) strategy compared with an anatomical coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) alone assessment in participants with intermediate coronary artery stenosis.

METHODS

In this prospective study conducted from April 2018 to March 2019, participants were assigned to either the CCTA or FFR_CT group. The primary endpoint was the rate of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) that demonstrated non-obstructive disease at 90 days. Secondary endpoints included coronary revascularization and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 567 participants were allocated to the CCTA group and 566 to the FFR_CT group. At 90 days, the rate of ICA without obstructive disease was higher in the CCTA group (33.3%, 39/117) than that (19.8%, 19/96) in the FFR_CT group (risk difference [RD] = 13.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.4%, 18.6%; p = 0.03). The ICA referral rate was higher in the CCTA group (27.5%, 156/567) than in the FFR_CT group (20.3%, 115/566) (RD = 7.2%, 95% CI: 2.3%, 12.1%; p = 0.003). The revascularization-to-ICA ratio was lower in the CCTA group than that in the FFR_CT group (RD = 19.8%, 95% CI: 14.1%, 25.5%, p = 0.002). MACE was more common in the CCTA group than that in the FFR_CT group at 1 year (HR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.95; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

In patients with intermediate stenosis, the FFR_CT strategy appears to be associated with a lower rate of referral for ICA, ICA without obstructive disease, and 1-year MACE when compared to the anatomical CCTA alone strategy.

KEY POINTS

• In stable patients with intermediate stenosis, ML-based FFR_CT strategy was associated with a lower referral ICA rate, a lower normalcy rate of ICA, and higher revascularization-to-ICA ratio than the CCTA strategy. • Compared with the CCTA strategy, ML-based FFR_CTshows superior outcome prediction value which appears to be associated with a lower rate of 1-year MACE. • ML-based FFR_CT strategy as a non-invasive "one-stop-shop" modality may be the potential to change diagnostic workflows in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Myocardial ischemia may occur in patients with normal or non-obstructive CAD on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The comprehensive evaluation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) integrated with fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (CT-FFR) to CAD may be essential to improve the outcomes of patients with non-obstructive CAD. China CT-FFR Study-2 (ChiCTR2000031410) is a large-scale prospective, observational study in 29 medical centers in China. The primary purpose is to uncover the relationship between the CCTA findings (including CT-FFR) and the outcome of patients with non-obstructive CAD. At least 10,000 patients with non-obstructive CAD but without previous revascularization will be enrolled. A 5-year follow-up will be performed. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarct, unplanned revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina. Clinical characteristics, laboratory and imaging examination results will be collected to analyze their prognostic value.

2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to assess and diagnose chest pain in adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from November 11, 2017, to May 1, 2020, encompassing randomized and nonrandomized trials, observational studies, registries, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through April 2021, were also considered.

STRUCTURE

Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits in the United States. The "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain" provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence on the assessment and evaluation of chest pain. This guideline presents an evidence-based approach to risk stratification and the diagnostic workup for the evaluation of chest pain. Cost-value considerations in diagnostic testing have been incorporated, and shared decision-making with patients is recommended.

2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to assess and diagnose chest pain in adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from November 11, 2017, to May 1, 2020, encompassing randomized and nonrandomized trials, observational studies, registries, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through April 2021, were also considered.

STRUCTURE

Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits in the United States. The "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain" provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence on the assessment and evaluation of chest pain. This guideline presents an evidence-based approach to risk stratification and the diagnostic workup for the evaluation of chest pain. Cost-value considerations in diagnostic testing have been incorporated, and shared decision-making with patients is recommended.

2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This executive summary of the clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to assess and diagnose chest pain in adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from November 11, 2017, to May 1, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through April 2021, were also considered.

STRUCTURE

Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits in the United States. The "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain" provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence on the assessment and evaluation of chest pain. These guidelines present an evidence-based approach to risk stratification and the diagnostic workup for the evaluation of chest pain. Cost-value considerations in diagnostic testing have been incorporated and shared decision-making with patients is recommended.

2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to assess and diagnose chest pain in adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from November 11, 2017, to May 1, 2020, encompassing randomized and nonrandomized trials, observational studies, registries, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through April 2021, were also considered. Structure: Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits in the United States. The "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain" provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence on the assessment and evaluation of chest pain. This guideline presents an evidence-based approach to risk stratification and the diagnostic workup for the evaluation of chest pain. Cost-value considerations in diagnostic testing have been incorporated, and shared decision-making with patients is recommended.

2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This executive summary of the clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to assess and diagnose chest pain in adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from November 11, 2017, to May 1, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through April 2021, were also considered. Structure: Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits in the United States. The "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain" provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence on the assessment and evaluation of chest pain. These guidelines present an evidence-based approach to risk stratification and the diagnostic workup for the evaluation of chest pain. Cost-value considerations in diagnostic testing have been incorporated and shared decision-making with patients is recommended.

Non-invasive Imaging in Coronary Syndromes - Recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, in Collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide, with a high socioeconomic impact.(1) Non-invasive imaging modalities play a fundamental role in the evaluation and management of patients with known or suspected CAD. Imaging end-points have served as surrogate markers in many observational studies and randomized clinical trials that evaluated the benefits of specific therapies for CAD.(2) A number of guidelines and recommendations have been published about coronary syndromes by cardiology societies and associations, but have not focused on the excellent opportunities with cardiac imaging. The recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2019 guideline on chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and 2020 guideline on acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) highlight the importance of non-invasive imaging in the diagnosis, treatment, and risk assessment of the disease.(3)(4) The purpose of the current recommendations is to present the significant role of non-invasive imaging in coronary syndromes in more detail. These recommendations have been developed by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE), in collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, all of which have approved the final document.

Influence of coronary stenosis location on diagnostic performance of machine learning-based fractional flow reserve from CT angiography

BACKGROUND

Compared with invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary CT angiography (cCTA) is limited in detecting hemodynamically relevant lesions. cCTA-based FFR (CT-FFR) is an approach to overcome this insufficiency by use of computational fluid dynamics. Applying recent innovations in computer science, a machine learning (ML) method for CT-FFR derivation was introduced and showed improved diagnostic performance compared to cCTA alone. We sought to investigate the influence of stenosis location in the coronary artery system on the performance of ML-CT-FFR in a large, multicenter cohort.

METHODS

Three hundred and thirty patients (75.2% male, median age 63 years) with 502 coronary artery stenoses were included in this substudy of the MACHINE (Machine Learning Based CT Angiography Derived FFR: A Multi-Center Registry) registry. Correlation of ML-CT-FFR with the invasive reference standard FFR was assessed and pooled diagnostic performance of ML-CT-FFR and cCTA was determined separately for the following stenosis locations: RCA, LAD, LCX, proximal, middle, and distal vessel segments.

RESULTS

ML-CT-FFR correlated well with invasive FFR across the different stenosis locations. Per-lesion analysis revealed improved diagnostic accuracy of ML-CT-FFR compared with conventional cCTA for stenoses in the RCA (71.8% [95% confidence interval, 63.0%-79.5%] vs. 54.8% [45.7%-63.8%]), LAD (79.3 [73.9-84.0] vs. 59.6 [53.5-65.6]), LCX (84.1 [76.0-90.3] vs. 63.7 [54.1-72.6]), proximal (81.5 [74.6-87.1] vs. 63.8 [55.9-71.2]), middle (81.2 [75.7-85.9] vs. 59.4 [53.0-65.6]) and distal stenosis location (67.4 [57.0-76.6] vs. 51.6 [41.1-62.0]).

CONCLUSION

In a multicenter cohort with high disease prevalence, ML-CT-FFR offered improved diagnostic performance over cCTA for detecting hemodynamically relevant stenoses regardless of their location.

Prevalence of pathological FFRCT values without coronary artery stenosis in an asymptomatic marathon runner cohort

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate computed tomography fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) values in distal parts of the coronaries in an asymptomatic cohort of marathon runners without any coronary stenosis for potentially false-positive values.

METHODS

Ninety-eight asymptomatic male marathon runners (age 53 ± 7 years) were enrolled in a prospective monocentric study and underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). CCTA data were analyzed for visual coronary artery stenosis. FFR_CT was evaluated in 59 participants without coronary artery stenosis in proximal, mid, and distal coronary sections using an on-site software prototype.

RESULTS

In participants without coronary artery stenosis, abnormal FFR_CT values ≤ 0.8 in distal segments were found in 22 participants (37%); in 19 participants in the LAD; in 5 participants in the LCX; and in 4 participants in the RCA. Vessel diameters in participants with FFR_CT values > 0.80 compared to ≤ 0.80 were 1.6 ± 0.3 mm versus 1.5 ± 0.3 mm for distal LAD (p = 0.025), 1.8 ± 0.3 mm versus 1.6 ± 0.5 mm for distal LCX (p = 0.183), and 2.0 ± 0.4 mm versus 1.5 ± 0.2 mm for distal RCA (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal FFR_CT values of ≤ 0.8 frequently occurred in distal coronary segments in subjects without any anatomical coronary artery stenosis. This effect is only to some degree explainable by small distal vessel diameters. Therefore, the validity of hemodynamic relevance evaluation using FFR_CT in distal coronary artery segment stenosis is reduced.

KEY POINTS

• Abnormal FFR_CT values (≤ 0.8) occurred in over a third of the subjects in the distal LAD despite the absence of coronary artery stenosis.. • Therefore, the validity of hemodynamic relevance evaluation in distal coronary artery segment stenosis is reduced. • Decision-making based on abnormal FFR_CT values in distal vessel sections should be performed with caution and only in combination with visual assessment of the grade of stenosis..

The Impact of Implementing 24/7 Cardiac CTA Interpretation in the Emergency Department on Patient Care: Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to provide insight on the diagnostic validity of cardiac CTA (CCTA) to identify obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and patients who require urgent intervention, compared with those who require same-admission coronary catheterization (CC), and to help elucidate the necessity of a 24/7 CCTA service. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed 658 consecutive CCTA examinations performed of emergency department (ED) patients who presented with acute chest pain from October 1, 2013, to February 28, 2018. Patients were categorized by CAD severity on CCTA. Using same-admission CC as the reference standard, we assessed CCTA's validity to identify obstructive disease using PPV, NPV, sensitivity, and specificity and CCTA's validity to identify patients who require urgent intervention. The added value of the CCTA findings of subendocardial hypoattenuation and wall motion abnormality was evaluated. CCTA examinations were categorized on the basis of the time of day when scanning was performed. RESULTS. The PPV, NPV, and sensitivity of CCTA to diagnose obstructive CAD were 0.87, 0.79, and 0.95, respectively. Nine percent of the scanned patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or were referred for urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The presence of obstructive CAD on CCTA has a PPV of 0.73 to identify patients deemed to be at higher acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk to warrant urgent PCI or CABG. Wall motion abnormality increased the PPV to 1.0; subendocardial attenuation increased the PPV to 0.9. The NPV and sensitivity were 0.89 and 0.97, respectively. Of the CCTA examinations, 54% were performed outside regular working hours. Of the patients who received urgent interventions, 62% underwent CCTA examinations performed outside regular working hours. CONCLUSION. CCTA provides high correlation with CC, helps identify individuals with high ACS risk, and is further strengthened by functional analysis; 24/7 CCTA service is warranted.

The evolving role of coronary CT angiography in Acute Coronary Syndromes

In the United States, non-obstructive coronary disease has been on the rise, and each year, nearly one million adults suffer myocardial infarction, 70% of which are non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). In addition, approximately 15% of patients suffering NSTEMI will have subsequent readmission for a recurrent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). While invasive angiography remains the standard of care in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to these patients, these methods have limitations that include procedural complications, uncertain specificity in diagnosis of the culprit lesion in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD), and challenges in following coronary disease over time. The role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for evaluating patients with both stable and acute chest pain has seen a paramount upshift in the last decade. This paper reviews the established role of CCTA for the rapid exclusion of obstructive plaque in troponin negative acute chest pain, while exploring opportunities to address challenges in the current approach to evaluating NSTEMI.

Current Role of Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Acute Coronary Syndrome

This review article provides an overview regarding the role of computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of acute chest pain (ACP) in the emergency department (ED), focusing on characteristic CT findings.

Improving CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Analysis: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Objectives

The aim of this study was to identify factors and quality improvement strategies to improve coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) studies referred for fractional flow reserve derived from CT angiography (FFRCT) analysis.

Methods

Thirty randomly selected CCTAs were analyzed for quality control. A uniform CCTA protocol was implemented by an in-house steering committee, emphasizing the importance of adequate heart rate control and nitroglycerine usage. Sixty additional randomly selected CCTAs were evaluated for quality at multiple time points during intervention, and FFRCT acceptance rate was analyzed at the conclusion.

Results

Prior to the implementation of this quality improvement program, our overall institution-specific percent acceptance rate was 76.1% for FFRCT compared to the national average of >95%. Post-intervention, this was improved to an average acceptance rate of 90% for FFRCT analysis.

Conclusions

Establishment and strict adherence to CCTA imaging protocols with appropriate training and adequate buy-in of CT technologists and nurses is a viable way of improving the quality of imaging and subsequent patient care.

Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography: where are we now and where are we heading?

Computed tomography coronary angiography is emerging as the preferred diagnostic tool for patients with chest pain. Additional knowledge of the extent and distribution of myocardial ischemia enables tailored patient management. Computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) employs computed tomography coronary angiography raw data processed via complex computational fluid dynamics and produces a surrogate of the invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) thus delivering anatomical and physiological assessment in a single test. FFR_CT has been extensively validated against invasive FFR and observational clinical studies have consistently demonstrated its utility as gatekeeper to invasive angiography while also reducing downstream clinical events and costs. Novel workstation-based models of estimating FFR are now being tested. Ongoing and future research results will define their role in clinical practice.

Machine learning-based CT fractional flow reserve assessment in acute chest pain: first experience

Background

Computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) enables the non-invasive functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis. We evaluated the feasibility and potential clinical role of FFR_CT in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain who underwent chest-pain CT (CPCT).

Methods

For this retrospective IRB-approved study, we included 56 patients (median age: 62 years, 14 females) with acute chest pain who underwent CPCT and who had at least a mild (≥25% diameter) coronary artery stenosis. CPCT was evaluated for the presence of acute plaque rupture and vulnerable plaque features. FFR_CT measurements were performed using a machine learning-based software. We assessed the agreement between the results from FFR_CT and patient outcome (including results from invasive catheter angiography and from any non-invasive cardiac imaging test, final clinical diagnosis and revascularization) for a follow-up of 3 months.

Results

FFR_CT was technically feasible in 38/56 patients (68%). Eleven of the 38 patients (29%) showed acute plaque rupture in CPCT; all of them underwent immediate coronary revascularization. Of the remaining 27 patients (71%), 16 patients showed vulnerable plaque features (59%), of whom 11 (69%) were diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and 10 (63%) underwent coronary revascularization. In patients with vulnerable plaque features in CPCT, FFRCT had an agreement with outcome in 12/16 patients (75%). In patients without vulnerable plaque features (n=11), one patient showed myocardial ischemia (9%). In these patients, FFR_CT and patient outcome showed an agreement in 10/11 patients (91%).

Conclusions

Our preliminary data show that FFR_CT is feasible in patients with acute chest pain who undergo CPCT provided that image quality is sufficient. FFR_CT has the potential to improve patient triage by reducing further downstream testing but appears of limited value in patients with CT signs of acute plaque rupture.

Cardiac Computed Tomography for Comprehensive Coronary Assessment: Beyond Diagnosis of Anatomic Stenosis

Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has evolved into a versatile imaging modality that can depict atherosclerosis burden, determine functional significance of a stenotic lesion, and guide the management and treatment of stable coronary artery disease.1 With newer-generation scanners, diagnostic CCTA can be obtained in the majority of patients with a very acceptable radiation dose. We discuss the ability of CCTA to provide comprehensive assessment of a patient with suspected CAD, including functional techniques of stress-rest myocardial perfusion assessment using a vasodilator and a purely post-processing approach that assesses fractional flow reserve derived by CCTA. In addition, recent data validated the role of CCTA in managing stable patients with chest pain and suspected CAD, serving as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiogram as well as optimizing the preprocedural planning of percutaneous coronary revascularization and coronary artery bypass surgery.