Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with mandible first sequence: A retrospective study

Comprehensive analysis of alar base inclination and lip line cant following orthognathic correction of maxillomandibular asymmetry: A retrospective study

This paper examines the relationship between roll rotation of the jaws and changes in alar base or lip line asymmetry in the coronal plane following orthognathic correction. The study involved patients with preoperative frontal alar base and lip line asymmetries greater than 0.5° (because it corresponds to the minimum asymmetry perception threshold) and underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery without (Group I) or with (Group II) genioplasty. The alar base angle (ABA), lip line cant angle (LLCA), maxillary cant angle (MxCA), and mandibular cant angle (MnCA) were measured using preoperative and 12 months postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Thirty-four patients were included in the study. Significant correlations were found between changes in MxCA and ABA besides between changes in MnCA and LCA in Groups I (P = 0.016, P˂0.001, respectively) and II (P = 0.002, P˂0.001, respectively). The mean of the change in ABA/the change in MxCA and the change in LLCA/the change in MnCA ratios for Group I were 0.59 ± 1.57 and 0.73 ± 0.94, respectively, while those for Group II were 0.46 ± 3.70 and 0.39 ± 2.00, respectively. Angular measurements from jugular and mental foramina points, aligned with the bony midline, offer a convenient tool for predicting alar base and lip symmetry during bimaxillary orthognathic surgery planning.

Mandibular autorotation: a critical virtual parameter in clinical decision-making regarding maxilla-first versus mandible-first sequence

Large degrees of mandibular autorotation during intermediate splint design are prone to transfer error and decrease accuracy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of mandibular autorotation necessary to design intermediate splints for maxilla- and mandible-first sequences using virtual planning software, to help the clinical decision-making regarding the most adequate sequence for each patient. The influence of specific orthognathic movements (different vertical and sagittal changes at the Le Fort I level, cant correction) and the type of maxillofacial deformity (skeletal Class II, III, anterior open bite) were evaluated to identify those that would require higher levels of autorotation for each sequence. Three-dimensional virtual surgical planning data of 194 patients were reviewed (126 female, 68 male; mean age 26.5 ± 11.0 years; 143 skeletal Class II, 51 skeletal Class III) and subgroup analyses were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc pairwise comparisons. As an additional parameter (mandibular autorotation), maxilla-first is indicated for bimaxillary osteotomies with Le Fort I posterior intrusion, anterior open bite, and skeletal Class III, while mandible-first is recommended for Le Fort I global extrusion, especially with maxillary cant correction.

Morpho-functional analysis of the temporomandibular joint following mandible-first bimaxillary surgery with mandible-only patient-specific implants

The aim of this study was to evaluate condylar and glenoid fossa remodeling after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery guided by patient-specific mandibular implants. In total, 18 patients suffering from dentofacial dysmorphism underwent a virtually planned bimaxillary mandibular PSI-guided orthognathic procedure. One month prior to surgery, patients underwent a CBCT scan and optical scans of the dental arches; these datasets were re-acquired 1 month and at least 9 months postsurgery. Three-dimensional models of the condyles, glenoid fossae, and interarticular surface space (IASS) were obtained and compared to evaluate the roto-translational positional discrepancy and surface variation of each condyle and glenoid fossa, and the IASS variation. The condylar position varied by an average of 4.31° and 2.18 mm, mainly due to surgically unavoidable ramus position correction. Condylar resorption remodeling was minimal (average ≤ 0.1 mm), and affected skeletal class III patients the most. Later condylar remodeling was positively correlated with patient age. No significant glenoid fossa remodeling was observed. No postoperative orofacial pain was recorded at clinical follow-up. The procedure was accurate in minimizing the shift in relationship between the bony components of the TMJ and their remodeling, and was effective in avoiding postoperative onset of orofacial pain. An increase in sample size, however, would be useful to confirm our findings.

Skeletal stability after mandible bilateral sagittal split osteotomy - comparison of patient-specific implant and mini-plate fixation: A retrospective study

The aim of the study was to compare the stability of the virtual surgical planning (VSP) and computer-aided design accompanied by patient-specific implants (PSIs) and conventional mini-plates in mandible advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). This retrospective study evaluates the clinical and cephalometric records of 53 patients (12 male, 41 female) treated with BSSO in Helsinki University Hospital. Subjects were divided into two groups: VSP-PSI (21 patients: 4 male and 17 female; mean age 38 years, range 25-53 years); and conventional wafer-based repositioning with mini-plate fixation (32 patients: 8 male and 24 female; mean age 39 years, range 21-56 years). The effect of the amount and direction of the advancement on the stability was also analysed individually. The standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs in three time points were analysed to compare the groups. After surgery (T2), there were no differences between groups in cephalometric variables. During follow-up (T2-T3), the cephalometric variables in both Groups A and B were stable, so there was no difference in stability between the VSP-PSI and the conventional mini-plate groups. During follow-up, the mandibles rotated clockwise or counterclockwise, relapsed towards their original direction, and the changes were statistically significant (jaw relationship; p = 0.018, soft tissue profile; p = 0.025); when the advancement of mandible was >6 mm, the increase in gonial angle compared to mandibles advanced ≤6 mm was statistically significant (p = 0.03). VSP-PSI and conventional mini-plate fixation can be considered equally stable. Large advancements with counterclockwise rotation regardless of fixation method are more susceptible to relapse. VSP-PSI alone cannot solve the relapse-related concerns in mandible osteotomy.

Sequencing in Orthognathic Bimaxillary Surgery: Which Jaw Should Be Operated First? A Scoping Review

Bimaxillary orthognathic surgery is widely used for the correction of dentoskeletal deformities. Surgery sequencing (maxilla or mandible first) remains debated, and guidelines and consensus are lacking. This scoping review summarizes the state of the art and compares the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches. The review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched using the PICO protocol and key words in orthognathic surgical sequencing. Four reviewers screened the records independently, and disagreement was resolved by consensus. A total of 23 records met the inclusion criteria. The advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches were compared and assessed for accuracy of reporting. Within the limitations of the present study, available evidence for the intrinsic advantages and the accuracy of the mandible-first sequence supports the choice of this approach in most cases. Nevertheless, each clinical case needs to be evaluated individually, as no dogmatic recommendations can be given for sequencing in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.