Thromboprophylaxis in medical-surgical intensive care unit patients

Barriers and potential solutions toward optimal prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis for hospitalized medical patients: a survey of healthcare professionals

OBJECTIVE

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis remains underused in hospitalized medical patients despite strong recommendations that at-risk patients should receive prophylaxis. To understand this gap between knowledge and practice, we surveyed clinicians' perceptions about the importance of DVT prophylaxis, barriers to guideline implementation, and interventions to optimize prophylaxis.

METHODS

Paper- and electronic mail-based surveys were sent to 1553 internists, nurses, pharmacists, and physiotherapists in Ontario, Canada. Responses were scored on 7-point Likert scales. An important barrier to optimal DVT prophylaxis was 1 with a mean score ≥5, and interventions with high potential success or feasibility were those with mean scores ≥5.

RESULTS

DVT prophylaxis was perceived as important by all clinician groups but this did not appear to translate into knowledge about underutilization of current DVT prophylaxis strategies. Physicians and pharmacists recognized the underuse of DVT prophylaxis in medical patients, while nurses and physiotherapists tended to perceive prophylaxis strategies as appropriate. Lack of clear indications and contraindications for prophylaxis and concerns about bleeding risks were perceived as important barriers. Preprinted orders were considered the most potentially successful and feasible way to optimize prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable barrier to optimal DVT prophylaxis utilization may be that those healthcare providers best able to conduct a daily assessment of patients' need for prophylaxis underrecognize the problem that prophylaxis is underutilized in this population. Interventions to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice should consider preprinted orders outlining DVT risk factors, and educating front-line care providers prior to implementation of a top-down approach.

Surgical intensive care unit--the trauma surgery perspective

PURPOSE

This review addresses and summarizes the key issues and unique specific intensive care treatment of adult patients from the trauma surgery perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cornerstones of successful surgical intensive care management are fluid resuscitation, transfusion protocol and extracorporeal organ replacement therapies. The injury-type specific complications and unique pathophysiologic regulatory mechanisms of the traumatized patients influencing the critical care treatment are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Furthermore, the fundamental knowledge of the injury severity, understanding of the trauma mechanism, surgical treatment strategies and specific techniques of surgical intensive care are pointed out as essentials for a successful intensive care therapy.

Pharmacotherapy in pediatric critical illness: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pharmacotherapy is an under-evaluated element of critical care medicine. In order to better understand pharmacotherapy in pediatric critical illness, we evaluated a cohort of emergency admissions to a university-affiliated pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was performed. Eligible patients were admitted to this medical-surgical ICU for at least 24 hours. The primary outcomes were the number of drug orders written, the number of different medications ordered, and the number of drug administrations. Multiple regression analyses were used to identify factors independently associated with each primary outcome.

RESULTS

We studied 100 patients with a median age of 40 months (interquartile range [IQR] 9-82), who were admitted for a total of 851 ICU days. These patients received 4419 drug orders and 11 911 intermittent dose-administrations of 241 different medications. Each patient received a median of 29.5 (IQR 16.5-48.5) drug orders, 14 (IQR 9-18.5) different medications, and 58 (IQR 28-129) drug administrations while in the ICU. The most frequent orders were for morphine 457 (10.6%), furosemide (frusemide) 337 (7.8%), potassium 237 (5.5%), lorazepam 226 (5.2%), and albuterol (salbutamol) 158 (3.7%). The duration of PICU stay and severity of illness were independently associated with all primary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacotherapy is an active component in the practice of pediatric critical care medicine. We demonstrated that increasing numbers of ordered medications, drug orders, and drug administrations were associated with increasing duration of ICU therapies and the length of ICU stay. These data underscore the potential importance of improved safety and efficacy of medicines used to treat critically ill children.

The clinical research enterprise in critical care: what's right, what's wrong, and what's ahead?

Intensivists have been remarkably successful in using randomized controlled trials to assess aspects of current practice. Unfortunately, this success has not been mirrored in trials of new pharmacotherapy, despite convincing pathophysiological rationales and encouraging preliminary studies. Misunderstandings of biological processes and flawed early clinical studies have led to the almost universal failure of fundamentally new treatments subjected to large phase III trials, despite their sound methodology. Compounding these problems is the tendency for new approaches to be either implemented widely on the basis of relatively poor studies or ignored despite strong supporting evidence. Having mastered the principles of evidence-based medicine in assessing existing therapy, intensivists have established a strong foundation. Critical care medicine must now embrace the challenge of translating a more solid understanding of basic disease mechanisms into widely implemented treatments.