1
|
Aljuhani O, Al Sulaiman K, Korayem GB, Altebainawi AF, Alsohimi S, Alqahtani R, Alfaifi S, Alharbi A, AlKhayrat A, Hattan A, Albassam M, Almohammed OA, Alkeraidees A, Alonazi DA, Alsalman WF, Aldamegh G, Alshahrani R, Vishwakarma R. The association between tocilizumab therapy and the development of thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicenter, cohort study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3037. [PMID: 38321099 PMCID: PMC10847412 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53087-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of tocilizumab for the management of COVID-19 emerged since it modulates inflammatory markers by blocking interleukin 6 receptors. Concerns regarding higher thrombosis risk while using tocilizumab were raised in the literature. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between tocilizumab therapy and the development of thromboembolic events in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A propensity score-matched, multicenter cohort study for critically ill adult patients with COVID-19. Eligible patients admitted to ICU between March 2020 and July 2021 were categorized into two sub-cohorts based on tocilizumab use within 24 h of ICU admission. The primary endpoint was to assess the incidence of all thrombosis cases during ICU stay. The secondary endpoints were 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, and the highest coagulation parameters follow-up (i.e., D-dimer, Fibrinogen) during the stay. Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) was based on nine matching covariates. Among a total of 867 eligible patients, 453 patients were matched (1:2 ratio) using propensity scores. The thrombosis events were not statistically different between the two groups in crude analysis (6.8% vs. 7.7%; p-value = 0.71) and regression analysis [OR 0.83, 95% CI (0.385, 1.786)]. Peak D-dimer levels did not change significantly when the patient received tocilizumab (beta coefficient (95% CI): 0.19 (- 0.08, 0.47)), while there was a significant reduction in fibrinogen levels during ICU stay (beta coefficient (95% CI): - 0.15 (- 0.28, - 0.02)). On the other hand, the 30-day and in-hospital mortality were significantly lower in tocilizumab-treated patients (HR 0.57, 95% CI (0.37, 0.87), [HR 0.67, 95% CI (0.46, 0.98), respectively). The use of tocilizumab in critically ill patients with COVID-19 was not associated with higher thrombosis events or peak D-dimer levels. On the other hand, fibrinogen levels, 30-day and in-hospital mortality were significantly lower in the tocilizumab group. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ohoud Aljuhani
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Al Sulaiman
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC)-Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, PO Box 22490, 11426, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Ghazwa B Korayem
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali F Altebainawi
- Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Salman Specialist Hospital, Hail Health Cluster, Hail, Saudi Arabia
| | - Samiah Alsohimi
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rahaf Alqahtani
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saeedah Alfaifi
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Dallah Hospital, Riydah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aisha Alharbi
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Azzah AlKhayrat
- Pharmaceutical Care Services, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Hattan
- Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Meshal Albassam
- Department of Internal Medicine & Critical Care, King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Atheer Alkeraidees
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dhay A Alonazi
- College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Weam F Alsalman
- College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ghaliah Aldamegh
- College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rasha Alshahrani
- College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ramesh Vishwakarma
- Norwich clinical trial unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Althemery AU, Albadi MA, Allaf AF, Almoqren SS, Alnajjar AH, Alkholifi FK. Comparing oxygen demand in critical covid-19 patients using single versus double doses of tocilizumab. Saudi Med J 2023; 44:513-517. [PMID: 37182918 PMCID: PMC10187733 DOI: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.5.20220755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the outcomes of single versus double doses of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19, especially on different types of oxygenation requirements. METHODS This cross-sectional study was carried out from January 2020 to March 2020. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19, who received at least one dose of tocilizumab, were included. The dependent variable was tocilizumab dose (single versus double). The primary outcome variable was oxygen demand on the first and last day of hospitalization. A series of comparisons between patients administered one dose of tocilizumab versus 2 doses were conducted. RESULTS Herein, 80 patients with severe COVID-19 infection were included, of whom 68.8% received one dose of tocilizumab, while 31.3% received a double dose. Two-thirds of the patients were male, with an overall average age of 58 years. In patients receiving 2 doses, oxygen demand tended to worsen by the seventh day, while in those who received one dose. The group that received 2 doses had a longer length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION This study could not capture the additional value of the second dose for different health outcomes. However, the results can inform clinician from experience when facing uncertainty due to new virus or variant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah U. Althemery
- From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy (Abdullah, Fisal), College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj; from the Internal Medicine Department (Marzoog, Ahmad) and Pharmacy Department (Amal), Security Forces Hospital; and from Pharmaceutical Care Services (Shekhah), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Marzoog A. Albadi
- From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy (Abdullah, Fisal), College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj; from the Internal Medicine Department (Marzoog, Ahmad) and Pharmacy Department (Amal), Security Forces Hospital; and from Pharmaceutical Care Services (Shekhah), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Ahmad F. Allaf
- From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy (Abdullah, Fisal), College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj; from the Internal Medicine Department (Marzoog, Ahmad) and Pharmacy Department (Amal), Security Forces Hospital; and from Pharmaceutical Care Services (Shekhah), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Shekhah S. Almoqren
- From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy (Abdullah, Fisal), College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj; from the Internal Medicine Department (Marzoog, Ahmad) and Pharmacy Department (Amal), Security Forces Hospital; and from Pharmaceutical Care Services (Shekhah), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Amal H. Alnajjar
- From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy (Abdullah, Fisal), College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj; from the Internal Medicine Department (Marzoog, Ahmad) and Pharmacy Department (Amal), Security Forces Hospital; and from Pharmaceutical Care Services (Shekhah), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Faisal K. Alkholifi
- From the Department of Clinical Pharmacy (Abdullah, Fisal), College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj; from the Internal Medicine Department (Marzoog, Ahmad) and Pharmacy Department (Amal), Security Forces Hospital; and from Pharmaceutical Care Services (Shekhah), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Langford BJ, So M, Simeonova M, Leung V, Lo J, Kan T, Raybardhan S, Sapin ME, Mponponsuo K, Farrell A, Leung E, Soucy JPR, Cassini A, MacFadden D, Daneman N, Bertagnolio S. Antimicrobial resistance in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. THE LANCET. MICROBE 2023; 4:e179-e191. [PMID: 36736332 PMCID: PMC9889096 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(22)00355-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frequent use of antibiotics in patients with COVID-19 threatens to exacerbate antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to establish the prevalence and predictors of bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance in patients with COVID-19. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of bacterial co-infections (identified within ≤48 h of presentation) and secondary infections (>48 h after presentation) in outpatients or hospitalised patients with COVID-19. We searched the WHO COVID-19 Research Database to identify cohort studies, case series, case-control trials, and randomised controlled trials with populations of at least 50 patients published in any language between Jan 1, 2019, and Dec 1, 2021. Reviews, editorials, letters, pre-prints, and conference proceedings were excluded, as were studies in which bacterial infection was not microbiologically confirmed (or confirmed via nasopharyngeal swab only). We screened titles and abstracts of papers identified by our search, and then assessed the full text of potentially relevant articles. We reported the pooled prevalence of bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance by doing a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. Our primary outcomes were the prevalence of bacterial co-infection and secondary infection, and the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens among patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and bacterial infections. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021297344). FINDINGS We included 148 studies of 362 976 patients, which were done between December, 2019, and May, 2021. The prevalence of bacterial co-infection was 5·3% (95% CI 3·8-7·4), whereas the prevalence of secondary bacterial infection was 18·4% (14·0-23·7). 42 (28%) studies included comprehensive data for the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial infections. Among people with bacterial infections, the proportion of infections that were resistant to antimicrobials was 60·8% (95% CI 38·6-79·3), and the proportion of isolates that were resistant was 37·5% (26·9-49·5). Heterogeneity in the reported prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in organisms was substantial (I2=95%). INTERPRETATION Although infrequently assessed, antimicrobial resistance is highly prevalent in patients with COVID-19 and bacterial infections. Future research and surveillance assessing the effect of COVID-19 on antimicrobial resistance at the patient and population level are urgently needed. FUNDING WHO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J Langford
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Miranda So
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Valerie Leung
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer Lo
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tiffany Kan
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mia E Sapin
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kwadwo Mponponsuo
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Elizabeth Leung
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, UK
| | - Jean-Paul R Soucy
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Derek MacFadden
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nick Daneman
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kardos Z, Szabó M, Baráth Z, Miksi Á, Oláh C, Kozma Á, Gergely JA, Csánky E, Szekanecz Z. Tocilizumab in Combination with Corticosteroids in COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Single-Centre Retrospective Controlled Study. Biomedicines 2023; 11:349. [PMID: 36830885 PMCID: PMC9953028 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Interleukin 6 receptor inhibition by tocilizumab (TCZ) has been effectively used worldwide for the treatment of multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) associated with COVID-19. In this single centre study, we compared the outcome of COVID-19 pneumonia in TCZ-treated vs. untreated (control) patients. We wished to compare TCZ administration in the general ward vs. in the intensive care unit (ICU). We also studied the role of a consulting rheumatologist in the management of severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients and methods: In our patients, COVID-19 pneumonia was confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 PCR, chest X-ray, and CT. We compared patients selected for TCZ treatment with TCZ-untreated age- and sex-matched controls. All patients received corticosteroids. In the TCZ-treated group, patients received one or two doses of TCZ 8 mg/kg IV in combination with corticosteroids. We recorded age, sex, symptom duration, oxygen saturation (SaO2), partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), total white blood cell (WBC), absolute neutrophil, absolute lymphocyte and platelet counts, CRP, ferritin, IL-6, LDH, procalcitonin (PCT), and D-dimer. The primary outcome parameters were the need for ICU, ventilation, death, and time of hospitalisation. Results: Altogether, 104 patients, 52 TCZ-treated and 52 TCZ-untreated, were included in this study. At baseline, the TCZ-treated patient group indeed had more pronounced COVID-19-related MIS compared to controls. Consultation with a rheumatologist was performed in 60% vs. 40% of cases. Nineteen patients (37%) received one, while 33 (63%) received two TCZ doses. TCZ was administered to 28 patients (54%) in the general ward and to 24 (46%) in the ICU. TCZ treatment was found to be safe in our COVID-19 pneumonia patients. TCZ treatment favourably influenced MIS biomarkers, and was associated with better clinical outcomes compared to controls. Patients receiving TCZ treatment in combination with corticosteroids already in the general ward exerted much better outcomes than those treated in the ICU. Consultation with a rheumatologist also improved outcome. Conclusions: We successfully used TCZ in combination with corticosteroids in Hungarian COVID-19 pneumonia patients. We pointed out the importance of early treatment already in the general ward, and the involvement of a rheumatologist in making treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsófia Kardos
- Departments of Rheumatology, Borsod Academic County Hospital, H-3529 Miskolc, Hungary
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Miskolc, H-3515 Miskolc, Hungary
| | - Miklós Szabó
- Departments of Pulmonology, Borsod Academic County Hospital, H-3529 Miskolc, Hungary
| | - Zsuzsanna Baráth
- Departments of Rheumatology, Borsod Academic County Hospital, H-3529 Miskolc, Hungary
| | - Ágnes Miksi
- Departments of Rheumatology, Borsod Academic County Hospital, H-3529 Miskolc, Hungary
| | - Csaba Oláh
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Borsod Academic County Hospital, H-3526 Miksolc, Hungary
| | - Ádám Kozma
- Departments of Institutional Pharmacy, Borsod Academic County Hospital, H-3526 Miskolc, Hungary
| | - József A. Gergely
- Departments of Institutional Pharmacy, Borsod Academic County Hospital, H-3526 Miskolc, Hungary
| | - Eszter Csánky
- Departments of Pulmonology, Borsod Academic County Hospital, H-3529 Miskolc, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Szekanecz
- Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Korayem GB, Aljuhani O, Altebainawi AF, Shaya AIA, Alnajjar LI, Alissa A, Aldhaeefi M, Kensara R, Al Muqati H, Alhuwahmel A, Alhuthaili O, Vishwakarma R, Aldardeer N, Eljaaly K, Alharbi A, Harbi SA, Katheri AA, Bekairy AMA, Aljedai A, Al Sulaiman K. The safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab in older adult critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicenter, cohort study. Int J Infect Dis 2022; 122:252-259. [PMID: 35605948 PMCID: PMC9121644 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evidence supports tocilizumab (TCZ) benefit and safety in adult patients with severe COVID-19. However, its effectiveness in critically ill older adult patients remains questionable. Thus, the study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of TCZ in older critically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS A multicenter, retrospective study for all critically ill older adults (aged ≥65 years) with confirmed COVID-19 infection and admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs). Eligible patients were categorized into two groups based on TCZ use during ICU stay (control vs TCZ). Propensity score (PS) matching was used (1:1 ratio) based on the selected criteria. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality. RESULTS A total of 368 critically ill older adult patients were included in the study. Fifty one patients (13.8%) received TCZ. The in-hospital mortality was lower in the TCZ group (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.22-0.76, P-value = 0.005). Patients who received TCZ had lower odds of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (OR [95% CI]: 0.32 [0.10-0.98], P-value = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups for 30-days mortality, ventilator-free days, length of stay, and complications during ICU stay. CONCLUSION Tocilizumab use in critically ill older adult patients with COVID-19 is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and a similar safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghazwa B. Korayem
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P. O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ohoud Aljuhani
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali F. Altebainawi
- Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Salman Specialist Hospital, Hail Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman I. Al Shaya
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Lina I. Alnajjar
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P. O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia,Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman Alissa
- Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Aldhaeefi
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Raed Kensara
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hessa Al Muqati
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulmohsen Alhuwahmel
- College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Omar Alhuthaili
- College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ramesh Vishwakarma
- Statistics Department, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Namareq Aldardeer
- Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Eljaaly
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia,College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Aisha Alharbi
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shmeylan Al Harbi
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulmalik Al Katheri
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulkareem M. Al Bekairy
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Aljedai
- Deputyship of Therapeutic Affairs, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Al Sulaiman
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,Saudi Critical Care Pharmacy Research (SCAPE) Platform, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,Corresponding author: Khalid A. Al Sulaiman, Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC)-Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS); PO Box 22490, 11426, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aljuhani O, Al Sulaiman K, Alshabasy A, Eljaaly K, Al Shaya AI, Noureldeen H, Aboudeif M, Al Dosari B, Alkhalaf A, Korayem GB, Aleissa MM, Badreldin HA, Al Harbi S, Alhammad A, Vishwakarma R. Association between tocilizumab and emerging multidrug-resistant organisms in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21:1127. [PMID: 34724920 PMCID: PMC8559694 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06813-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tocilizumab is an IgG1 class recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that directly inhibits the IL-6 receptor. Several randomized clinical trials have evaluated its safety and efficacy in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and these studies demonstrate conflicting results. Our study aimed to determine the association between tocilizumab treatment and microbial isolation and emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria in critically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at two tertiary government hospitals in Saudi Arabia. All critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units with a positive COVID-19 PCR test between March 1 and December 31, 2020, who met study criteria were included. Patients who received tocilizumab were compared to those who did not receive it. RESULTS A total of 738 patients who met our inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. Of these, 262 (35.5%) received tocilizumab, and 476 (64.5%) were included in the control group. Patients who received tocilizumab had higher odds for microbial isolation (OR 1.34; 95% CI 0.91-1.94, p = 0.13); however, the difference was not statistically significant. Development of resistant organisms (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.51-1.98, p = 0.99) or detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.29-1.54, p = 0.34) was not statistically significant between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Tocilizumab use in critically ill patients with COVID-19 is not associated with higher microbial isolation, the emergence of resistant organisms, or the detection of CRE organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ohoud Aljuhani
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80260, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Khalid Al Sulaiman
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- College of Pharmacy, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adel Alshabasy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Khalid Eljaaly
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80260, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia
- College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Abdulrahman I Al Shaya
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- College of Pharmacy, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Haytham Noureldeen
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohammed Aboudeif
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Bodoor Al Dosari
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amina Alkhalaf
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80260, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ghazwa B Korayem
- College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muneera M Aleissa
- College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hisham A Badreldin
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- College of Pharmacy, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shmeylan Al Harbi
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- College of Pharmacy, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Alhammad
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ramesh Vishwakarma
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|