CustomVue laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Visx S4 excimer laser

Comparison of the 1st Generation and 3rd Generation Wavefront-Guided LASIK for the Treatment of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Purpose

To compare refractive, visual, and patient-reported outcomes associated with a 1st generation wavefront-guided (WFG) treatment with those associated with a 3rd generation WFG treatment.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study included patients who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia/myopic astigmatism. Two random stratified samples of patients who underwent either 1stgeneration (WaveScan, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA) or 3rd generation (iDesign 2.0, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA) treatment matched on preoperative refraction were compared (4290 eyes of 2145 patients in each group). One-month postoperative visual, refractive, and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. Refractive and monocular visual acuity analyses were performed using one random eye of each patient.

Results

The percentage of eyes achieving 20/20 or better uncorrected vision was 91.3% (1958/2145) in the 1st generation group and 95.9% (2056/2145) in the 3rd generation group (p<0.01). Binocularly, the percentage of patients with 20/20 or better UDVA was 97.0% (2080/2145) and 99.2% (2127/2145) in the 1st and 3rd generation groups, respectively (p<0.01). The mean postoperative MSE was -0.01 ± 0.33 D in the 1st generation group and +0.19 ± 0.33 D in the 3rd generation group (p<0.01). Postoperative refractive astigmatism had a mean value of -0.20 ± 0.26 D and -0.18 ± 0.24 D in the 1st and 3rd generation groups, respectively (p<0.01). The mean correction index of refractive astigmatism was 1.09 ± 0.53 in the 1st generation group and 1.02 ± 0.38 in the 3rd generation group, p<0.01. The overall percentage of patients satisfied with vision was 92.8% (1991/2145 patients) in the 1st generation group and 97.3% (2087/2145 patients) in the 3rd generation group (p<0.01).

Conclusion

For the majority of postoperative variables, there were significant differences between 1st and 3rd generation treatments. The 3rd generation treatments had better visual acuity outcomes and higher patient satisfaction.

The 25th Anniversary of Laser Vision Correction in the United States

Laser Vision Correction (LVC) is an elective, self-pay and safe surgical procedure to correct myopia and hyperopia. Since FDA approval 25 years ago, there have been a progression of technological improvements leading to better outcomes and LVC is now one of the safest surgical procedures. With a potential pool of 50 million patients, 6000 trained ophthalmic surgeons regularly treating in over 1000 centers of which 65% are physician owned. Treatments remain low from an earlier peak of 1.4 million to less than 800,000 over last 10 years. The factors preventing patients undergoing surgery have not changed and include the cost of $2000 ± $1000 per eye and fear of laser surgery on their eyes. The latter is overcome by word of mouth referrals and positive social media messaging. In addition, press misinformation and lack of optometrists participating in co-management have not helped grow LVC procedures despite the positive results of the FDA’s Patient Reported Outcomes with LASIK studies known as PROWL. The surgery is quick, and patients can be “in and out” in less than two hours with a rapid recovery, minimal postoperative restrictions and within 24 hours have 20/20 vision. Volume and price drives center and physician profitability with a scheduling capacity of two to four patients’ treatments per hour. Laser vision correction and especially LASIK, remains the treatment of choice for myopic and hyperopic patients wanting to remove their dependency on glasses and contact lenses.

Comparison of 2 wavefront-guided excimer lasers for myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results

PURPOSE

To compare laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) outcomes between 2 wavefront-guided excimer laser systems in the treatment of myopia.

SETTING

University eye clinic, Palo Alto, California, USA.

DESIGN

Prospective comparative case series.

METHODS

One eye of patients was treated with the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q system (small-spot scanning laser) and the fellow eye with the Visx Star Customvue S4 IR system (variable-spot scanning laser). Evaluations included measurement of uncorrected visual acuity, corrected visual acuity, and wavefront aberrometry.

RESULTS

One hundred eyes (50 patients) were treated. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -3.89 diopters (D) ± 1.67 (SD) and -4.18 ± 1.73 D in the small-spot scanning laser group and variable-spot scanning laser group, respectively. There were no significant differences in preoperative higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between the groups. Twelve months postoperatively, all eyes in the small-spot scanning laser group and 92% in the variable-spot scanning laser group were within ±0.50 D of the intended correction (P = .04). At that time, the small-spot scanning laser group had significantly less spherical aberration (0.12 versus 0.15) (P = .04) and significantly less mean total higher-order root mean square (0.33 μm versus 0.40 μm) (P = .01). Subjectively, patients reported that the clarity of night and day vision was significantly better in the eye treated with the small-spot scanning laser.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictability and self-reported clarity of vision of wavefront-guided LASIK were better with the small-spot scanning laser. Eyes treated with the small-spot scanning laser had significantly fewer HOAs.

Early clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided myopic LASIK treatments using a new-generation hartmann-shack aberrometer

PURPOSE

To provide an initial retrospective evaluation of early postoperative outcomes after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK using a new-generation Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor.

METHODS

A noncomparative, retrospective study of 243 eyes of 126 patients that underwent primary wavefront-guided LASIK, using wavefront data obtained with a new Hartmann-Shack aberrometer (iDesign Advanced WaveScan aberrometer; Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Santa Ana, CA). Visual acuity, refraction, and patient satisfaction were evaluated 1 month after surgery.

RESULTS

The manifest spherical equivalent was reduced from -3.28 ± 1.79 diopters (D) (range: -9.88 to -0.38 D) before surgery to -0.03 ± 0.29 D (range: -1.00 to +1.25 D) 1 month after surgery. The manifest spherical equivalent was within 0.50 and 1.00 D of target in 93.0% and 99.6% of eyes, respectively. Manifest astigmatism preoperatively (-0.72 ± 0.67 [range: 0.0 to -5.00 D]) was reduced to -0.14 ± 0.20 (range: 0.0 to -1.00 D) at 1 month and the vector-derived correction ratio (surgically induced refractive change/intended refractive correction) was 1.02 ± 0.30. Uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/16, 20/20, and 20/25 or better was achieved in 79.0%, 93.4%, and 96.7% of eyes, respectively. No eyes lost two or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity, whereas a gain of one or more lines was observed in 14.0%. Most patients (98.5%) reported that they were satisfied with the outcome of their procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided LASIK using the new aberrometer in this retrospective evaluation was effective, safe, and predictable in the early postoperative time period for the correction of myopia with high patient satisfaction.

Quantification of ghosting produced with presbyopic contact lens correction

OBJECTIVES

The defocused portion of the image obtained in wearers of bifocal and multifocal contact lenses often appears as a "ghost." Relatively few methods exist to quantify the ghosting perceived with lenses. The purpose of this study is to validate and implement a questionnaire to help patients quantify the ghost images perceived with bifocal or multifocal corrections.

METHODS

Ten subjects viewed simulated bifocal vision images displayed on a monitor. Images contained a focused and a defocused (ghost) component of a specific dimension (direction, position offset, intensity, and focus). Using a test card, the subjects identified the ghosting dimension level displayed on the monitor. An additional 54 presbyopic subjects wearing a multifocal correction monocularly viewed a well-focused stimulus and then compared the perceived image to that of the other well-corrected eye looking at the ghosting test card to quantify their visual experience of the 4 proposed ghosting dimensions.

RESULTS

Regardless of ghost letter size and orientation, subject responses were within 1 rating unit of expected on >95% of all trials for all 4 dimensions when asked to directly match a single dimension of ghosting. With bifocal images containing random amounts of these 4 dimensions most response errors were also within ± 1 unit. In presbyopes wearing a multifocal lens, the focus dimension was most strongly associated with overall ratings of ghosting.

CONCLUSIONS

The subjects can accurately and reliably report on ghost intensity, focus, direction and position offset, and well-focused ghosts are most correlated with the overall perceptual saliency of ghosting.

Effects of advanced surface ablations and intralase femtosecond LASIK on higher order aberrations and visual acuity outcome

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To study the changes in wavefront (ocular) and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) and visual acuity (VA) outcome following wavefront-guided advanced surface ablation (ASA) techniques and intralase femtosecond LASIK (iLASIK) in myopia treatment.

METHODS

Ocular aberration and corneal topography of 240 eyes in the ASA techniques (this was equally divided into a flap-on group where the epithelial flap was preserved and reapplied to the photoablated stromal bed and a flap-off group when the epithelial flap was discarded during the procedure), and 138 eyes in the iLASIK group were obtained before and 3 months following treatment. The correlation of aberrations with best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was analyzed.

RESULTS

At 3 months, there was statistically significant (P < 0.001) surgically induced increase in spherical aberration (SA) in each of the techniques for both ocular and corneal analysis. iLASIK induced significantly less ocular and corneal HOAs (P < 0.001). The mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent was closer to attempted correction compared to other groups (P < 0.001). Eighty-three eyes (70%) of flap-on, 80 (67%) flap-off and 94 eyes (68%) in the iLASIK group achieved 20/20 uncorrected VA. Fifteen eyes (11%) accomplished 20/12.5 or better in iLASIK compared to 4 (3%) for flap-on and 7 (6%) for flap-off ASA group. Only the flap-off treatment showed a consistent correlation between the corrected aberrations and visual performance.

CONCLUSION

At 3 months, all procedures resulted in a significant increase in HOAs and SA. All had comparable 20/20 VA and 11% of iLASIK patients achieved 20/12.5 or better level.

Efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting anterior and non-anterior corneal astigmatism: comparative study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating corneal astigmatism and in treating noncorneal ocular residual astigmatism.

SETTING

Private practice, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

The records of dominant eyes of consecutive patients who had LASIK were retrospectively analyzed to compare the efficacy of LASIK in eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism with the efficacy in eyes with predominantly ocular residual astigmatism (ORA). The ORA was determined by vector analysis using refractive cylinder and topographic astigmatism. Preoperatively, the ratio of ORA to preoperative refractive cylinder (R) was used to divide the patients into 2 groups; that is, eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism (ORA/R ratio <1.0) and eyes with predominantly ORA (ORA/R ratio ≥1.0). Efficacy was determined by examining the magnitude of the remaining uncorrected astigmatism and comparing the index of success (proportion of preoperative refractive astigmatism that remained uncorrected by LASIK) between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 61 eyes of 61 patients. Conventional LASIK was twice as efficacious in the low-ORA group as in the high-ORA group. The index of success was 0.24 and 0.50, respectively, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (P = .036).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of astigmatic correction by LASIK was significantly higher in eyes in which the preoperative refractive astigmatism was located mainly on the anterior corneal surface than in eyes in which it was mainly located posterior to the anterior corneal surface.

Wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy to correct ametropia following aspheric ReSTOR implantation

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical course of three eyes of two patients who underwent wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy to correct ametropia following cataract extraction and aspheric ReSTOR lens (SN6AD3; +4.00-diopter model) implantation.

METHODS

Pre-and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and WaveScans based on the Hartmann-Shack analyzer were evaluated. The VISX STAR S4 excimer with eye tracking and iris registration was used in all cases.

RESULTS

Good quality WaveScans were obtained; UCVA improved in all cases and BSCVA improved or remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases demonstrate that it is possible to obtain good quality wavefront data in patients with the ReSTOR lens and to use such data to design wavefront-guided treatment to maximize uncorrected distance and near visual acuities after ReSTOR implantation.

LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction

PURPOSE

To analyze the patient reported outcome of satisfaction after LASIK surgery.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

PARTICIPANTS

Patient data from previously reported studies.

METHODS

A literature search conducted for the years 1988 to 2008 that included pertinent LASIK surgery information from the review of 2915 retrieved citations. All abstracts from these citations were reviewed and 1581 were deemed to be relevant for review. Complete copies of each of these relevant (1581) articles were obtained, and after thorough analysis each was rated based on the strength of the study design and weight of evidence. A level I rating was assigned to properly conducted, well-designed, randomized clinical trials; a level II rating to well-designed cohort and case-control studies; and a level III rating to case series, case reports, and poorly designed prospective and retrospective studies. Level I and II rated, peer-reviewed articles were entered into a database, and level III articles were eliminated. A total of 309 articles were incorporated into this database, representing level I and level II well-controlled studies of primary LASIK surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients' satisfaction rates and factors associated with dissatisfaction.

RESULTS

Nineteen of the 309 database articles (6.1%) reported on both patient quality of life and satisfaction and together encompassed a total of 2198 subjects. The procedures from these 19 articles took place between 1995 and 2003. The overall patient satisfaction rate after primary LASIK surgery was 95.4% (2097 of 2198 subjects; range of patient satisfaction for the 19 articles was 87.2%-100%). The patient satisfaction rate after myopic LASIK was 95.3% (1811 of 1901 patients), and after hyperopic LASIK was 96.3% (286 of 297 subjects).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this review, worldwide, an average 95.4% of patients were satisfied with their outcome after LASIK surgery. With 16.3 million procedures performed worldwide, and more than a decade of clinical studies and technological innovation, LASIK surgery should be considered among the most successful elective procedures. LASIK surgery compares more favorably with other elective surgical procedures in terms of generally higher satisfaction rates.

Comparison of Collamer toric implantable [corrected] contact lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative visual outcomes after implantation of a Collamer toric implantable contact lens (ICL) and after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in high myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan.

METHODS

This study comprised 30 eyes (18 patients) having toric ICL implantation and 24 eyes (17 patients) having wavefront-guided LASIK (Technolas 217z) to correct high myopic astigmatism (manifest spherical equivalent [SE] <or=-6.0 diopters [D]; manifest refractive cylinder >or=1.0 D). The safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and adverse events were assessed preoperatively and 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the mean safety index was 1.28+/-0.25 (SD) in the ICL group and 1.01+/-0.16 in the LASIK group and the mean efficacy index, 0.87+/-0.15 and 0.83+/-0.23, respectively. All eyes in the ICL group and 71% of eyes in the LASIK group were within +/-1.00 D of the targeted SE correction at 6 months. The mean change in manifest refraction from 1 week to 6 months was -0.04+/-0.24 D in the ICL group and -0.60+/-0.49 D in the LASIK group. There were no significant complications in the ICL group; 2 eyes (8.3%) in the LASIK group required enhancement ablations.

CONCLUSION

Toric ICL implantation was better than wavefront-guided LASIK in eyes with high myopic astigmatism in almost all measures of safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability, suggesting that toric ICL implantation may become a viable surgical option to treat high myopic astigmatism.

Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the treatment of high myopia by using the CustomVue wavefront platform

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy, predictability, and safety of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the treatment of high myopia by using the Visx S4 CustomVue wavefront platform.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive cases of eyes with high myopia (manifest refraction spherical equivalent >or= -6.00 D) that underwent non-physician-adjusted wavefront-guided LASIK by using the Visx S4 CustomVue wavefront platform. Forty-three eyes of 29 patients were included. Preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, WaveScan refraction, postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and BSCVA, and manifest refraction were determined. The clinical outcomes were evaluated on the basis of standard formats and criteria. Data at 3 months postoperatively are presented.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, we found mean sphere was -6.89 +/- 1.08 D, mean cylinder was -0.97 +/- 0.75 D, and mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -7.38 +/- 1.20 D. Postoperatively, mean sphere was 0.02 +/- 0.40 D, mean cylinder was -0.40 +/- 0.40 D, and mean SE was -0.18 +/- 0.43 D. UCVA was 20/15 or better in 27.9% and cumulatively 20/20 or better in 58% of eyes. All eyes treated had at least 20/50 UCVA. Efficacy index was 0.94. Eighty-two percent of eyes were within 0.50 D and 97.6% were within 1.00 D of emmetropia at the 3-month follow-up visit. Ninety-one percent of eyes either maintained or gained 1 line of BSCVA. No eye lost >1 line of BSCVA. The safety index was 1.1.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-month follow-up results of our study indicate that wavefront-guided LASIK by using the Visx S4 CustomVue wavefront platform is an effective, predictable, and safe treatment of high myopia.