Visual simulation through different intraocular lenses in patients with previous myopic corneal ablation using adaptive optics: Effect of tilt and decentration

Beam-Shaping Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens: Optical Assessment With Corneas of Increasing Spherical Aberration

PURPOSE

To assess the optical quality and halo formation of a beam-shaping extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) (AcrySof IQ Vivity; Alcon Laboratories, Inc) with corneas of long-range spherical aberration (SA) such as those resulting from myopic laser ablations.

METHODS

The optical quality of the EDOF IOL and a reference monofocal IOL was evaluated with three corneas (A, B, and C, with SA =+0.135, +0.290, +0.540 µm, respectively, for a 5.15-mm pupil at the IOL plane). The through-focus modulation transfer function area (MTFa) curves were obtained between -5.00 and +2.00 diopters (D) defocus range. The halo was also assessed with the three corneas.

RESULTS

Through-focus MTFa curves for a 4.5-mm IOL pupil showed a slight decrease in the maximum MTFa value provided by the EDOF IOL compared to the monofocal IOL in the three corneal situations (A: 45.9 vs 38.6 units; B: 41.1 vs 33.1 units, and C: 26.9 vs 23.8 units). For the 3.0-mm pupil, the EDOF IOL also had lower maximum MTFa than the monofocal IOL; however, the depth-of-focus increased to -2.20 D. With corneas A and B, the halo induced was of low energy with both IOLs. With cornea C, the EDOF IOL created a much larger and intense halo.

CONCLUSIONS

The EDOF IOL provided a good distance optical performance and an extended range of focus of approximately 2.00 D, with a halo of low intensity when evaluated with a corneal SA similar to the one induced by a low to moderate myopic ablation. With a high myopic ablation, the halo induced would be of considerable size and energy. [J Refact Surg. 2023;39(2):95-102.].

The Influence of Angle Alpha, Angle Kappa, and Optical Aberrations on Visual Outcomes after the Implantation of a High-Addition Trifocal IOL

The aim of our investigation was to examine the possible correlations between optical aberrations, angle kappa, angle alpha, and visual outcomes following cataract surgery. In total, 56 eyes of 28 patients were implanted with the Liberty 677MY trifocal intraocular lens (IOL). Pre- and postoperative higher-order aberrations, coma, astigmatism, angle alpha, and angle kappa were registered, along with uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at multiple distances. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity defocus curves were plotted, and the areas under the curve were calculated 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Excellent visual outcomes were found at all distances. Patients reported low levels of dysphotopsia, and 96.4% of patients achieved complete spectacle independence. While angle kappa significantly decreased during cataract surgery (p = 0.0007), angle alpha remained unchanged (p = 0.5158). Angle alpha correlated with postoperative HOAs and had a negative impact on near vision (p = 0.0543). Preoperative corneal HOA and coma had a strong adverse effect on future intermediate and near vision. Residual astigmatism significantly affected postoperative intermediate vision (p = 0.0091). Our results suggest that angle kappa is not an optimal predictive factor for future visual outcomes, while angle alpha and the preoperative screening of optical aberrations might help patient selection prior to multifocal IOL implantation.

Repeatability and Agreement of Wavefront aberrations of Pentacam AXL Wave- a new hybrid topographer and aberrometer with ITrace in healthy eyes

PURPOSE

To assess repeatability and agreement of Pentacam AXL Wave, with iTrace aberrometer.

SETTING

Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.

DESIGN

Prospective ,cross-sectional study.

METHODS

One hundred eyes of 100 patients underwent three sets of measurements, at a single visit, using Pentacam AXL Wave (Oculus, Germany) and iTrace (Tracey Technologies, USA).Lower-order aberration (LOA), higher-order aberration (HOA), Coma and Spherical Aberrations (SA) were analyzed. Repeatability was assessed using within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test-retest variability (TRT), within-subject coefficient of variation (COV) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and the correlation coefficient (r) to determine strength of relationship between measurements.

RESULTS

All measurements with Pentacam AXL Wave had repeatability with an ICC for total ocular aberrations ranging from 0.84 for HOAto 0.92 for LOA and corneal from 0.76 for HOA to 0.86 for LOA The Sw, TRT, COV of all aberrations were significantly lower (better) than those of iTrace (p < 0.001). The mean differences between 2 devices were insignificant for the comparison of all parameters, except for spherical aberration (0.011(0.002571 to 0.02008; P= 0.01). Both devices showed excellent corelations for ocular aberrations (tHOA (P=0.12,LoA= -0.52 to 0.025; r= 0.89); LOA (P=0.14, LoA = -2.71 to 2.61  ; r= 0.96) coma (P=0.27, LoA = -0.11 to 0.12; r= 0.89) and in SA (P=0.01,  LoA = -0.09 to 0.07;r=0.97)).

CONCLUSIONS

The repeatability estimates for wavefront aberrations using Pentacam AXL Wave were significantly better than that using iTrace. Both devices showed excellent corelations for total ocular aberrations.

Changes in Optical Quality Induced by Tilt and Decentration of a Trifocal IOL and a Novel Extended Depth of Focus IOL in Eyes With Corneal Myopic Ablations

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of decentration and tilt combined with prior myopic ablations on the optical performance of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a novel IOL with an extended depth of focus (EDOF) design.

METHODS

The XACT Mono-EDOF ME4 (Santen Pharmaceutical Co Ltd) and the trifocal FineVision (PhysIOL) IOLs were analyzed with and without simulated previous myopic ablations. The optical quality of the IOLs was evaluated with the PMTF optical bench (LAMBDA-X). The through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF) curves were recorded. Measurements were done for three situations: centered, 0.4 mm decentered, and 4 degrees tilted.

RESULTS

The trifocal IOL showed three peaks of vision and the EDOF IOL showed a far distance peak with intermediate addition. When decentration or tilt were induced, the trifocal IOL showed negligible changes but the EDOF IOL showed a -0.50 diopters (D) shift of the overall curve. With simulated myopic ablation, the trifocal IOL showed a -0.50 D shift of the curve. When tilt or decentration were also induced, the better optical results were found at -1.00 D. With myopic ablations, the EDOF IOL showed a -0.50 D shift of the optical quality and when decentration or tilt were then induced, negative shifts over -1.00 D were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The trifocal IOL was less affected by mis-alignments. When myopic ablations were induced, both lenses decreased their optical quality and the effects of misalignments were higher. In patients who have undergone corneal myopic ablation procedures, proper alignment of the implanted IOL and obtaining effective emmetropia becomes even more critical. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(8):532-537.].

Misalignment and tilt effect on aspheric intraocular lens designs after a corneal refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To numerically evaluate and compare the tolerance to misalignment and tilt of aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs) designed for three eyes: with standard cornea and with simulated corneas after myopic and hyperopic laser ablation surgery.

METHODS

Three aspheric IOLs of +20.00 diopter (D) with different spherical aberration (SA) ([Formula: see text]) values have been designed using a theoretical model eye. Drastic changes on the theoretical eye anterior corneal asphericity have been performed to simulate myopic and hyperopic refractive surgeries. The effect of IOL misalignment and tilt on the image quality has been evaluated using a commercial optical software design for the three eye models. Image quality was assessed from the modulation transfer function (MTF), root mean square (RMS) values of defocus, astigmatism, coma and spherical aberration ([Formula: see text]), and retinal images obtained from a visual simulator using an aleatory optotype of 0.00 LogMar visual acuity (VA).

RESULTS

IOL misalignment and tilt reduced MTF values in general, and increased wavefront aberrations errors. Aberration-free IOLs maintained best the MTF values when misalignments were applied, together with good on-axis optical quality. IOLs with negative SA ([Formula: see text]) correction decreased the MTF value under 0.43 for misalignments values higher than 0.50 mm with the three corneas. The effect of misalignment on RMS astigmatism and coma was correlated with the IOL SA ([Formula: see text]) and with the three corneas.

CONCLUSIONS

This theoretical study shows that the largest degradation in image quality arises for the IOL with the highest amount of spherical aberration ([Formula: see text]). Moreover, it has been found that the aspherical design has a more influential role in misalignment tolerance than in tilt tolerance.

Effect of Intraocular Lens Tilt and Decentration on Visual Acuity, Dysphotopsia and Wavefront Aberrations

Tilt and decentration of intraocular lenses (IOL) may occur secondary to a complicated cataract surgery or following an uneventful phacoemulsification. Although up to 2–3° tilt and a 0.2–0.3 mm decentration are common and clinically unnoticed for any design of IOL, larger extent of tilt and decentration has a negative impact on the optical performance and subsequently, the patients’ satisfaction. This negative impact does not affect various types of IOLs equally. In this paper we review the methods of measuring IOL tilt and decentration and focus on the effect of IOL tilt and decentration on visual function, in particular visual acuity, dysphotopsia, and wavefront aberrations. Our review found that the methods to measure the IOL displacement have significantly evolved and the available studies have employed different methods in their measurement, while comparability of these methods is questionable. There has been no universal reference point and axis to measure the IOL displacement between different studies. A remarkably high variety and brands of IOLs are used in various studies and occasionally, opposite results are noticed when two different brands of a same design were compared against another IOL design in two studies. We conclude that <5° of inferotemporal tilt is common in both crystalline lenses and IOLs with a correlation between pre- and postoperative lens tilt. IOL tilt has been noticed more frequently with scleral fixated compared with in-the-bag IOLs. IOL decentration has a greater impact than tilt on reduction of visual acuity. There was no correlation between IOL tilt and decentration and dysphotopsia. The advantages of aspheric IOLs are lost when decentration is >0.5 mm. The effect of IOL displacement on visual function is more pronounced in aberration correcting IOLs compared to spherical and standard non-aberration correcting aspherical IOLs and in multifocal versus monofocal IOLs. Internal coma has been frequently associated with IOL tilt and decentration, and this increases with pupil size. There is no correlation between spherical aberration and IOL tilt or decentration. Although IOL tilt produces significant impact on visual outcome in toric IOLs, these lenses are more sensitive to rotation compared to tilt.

Pre-operative simulation of post-operative multifocal vision

While multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) are increasingly implanted to correct for presbyopia, how one sees with a multifocal correction is hard to explain and imagine. The current study evaluates the quality of various visual simulating technologies by comparing vision with simulated MIOLs pre-operatively and the implanted MIOLs post-operatively in the same patients. Two simulation platforms were used: (1) a custom-developed adaptiveoptics (AO) system, with two visual simulator devices: a spatial light modulator (SLM) and an optotunable lens operating under temporal multiplexing (SimVis); and (2) a wearable, binocular, large field of view SimVis2Eyes clinical simulator (SimVis Gekko, 2Eyes Vision, Madrid, Spain). All devices were programmed to simulate a trifocal diffractive MIOL (POD F, FineVision, PhysIOL). Eight patients were measured pre-operatively simulating the trifocal lens and post-operatively with implantation of the same MIOL. Through-focus decimal visual acuity (TF VA) was measured (1) monocularly in monochromatic light using a four-alternative-forced-choice procedure in the AO system; and (2) binocularly using a clinical optotype in white light. Visual simulations pre-operatively predict well the TF VA performance found post-operatively in patients implanted with the real IOL. The average RMS difference between TF curves with the different visual simulators was 0.05 ± 0.01. The average RMS difference between the TF VA curves with the SimVis pre-operatively and the real MIOL post-operatively was 0.06 ± 0.01 in both platforms, and it was higher in cataract eyes (0.08 ± 0.01, on average across simulators) than in eyes with clear lens. In either group the shape of the TF curves is similar across simulators and pre- and post-operatively. TF curves cross-correlated significantly between simulators (lag k = 0, rho = 0.889), as well as with results with the real MIOL implanted (lag k = 0, rho = 0.853). Visual simulations are useful programmable tools to predict visual performance with MIOLs, both in an AO environment and in a clinical simulator. Pre-operative visual simulations and post-operative data are in good agreement.

Nonpupil adaptive optics for visual simulation of a customized contact lens

We present a method for determining the deformable mirror profile to simulate the optical effect of a customized contact lens in the central visual field. Using nonpupil-conjugated adaptive optics allows a wider field simulation compared to traditional pupil-conjugated adaptive optics. For a given contact lens, the mirror shape can be derived analytically using Fermat's principle of the stationary optical path or numerically using optimization in ray-tracing programs. An example of an aspheric contact lens simulation is given to illustrate the method, and the effect of eye misalignment with respect to the deformable mirror position is investigated. The optimal deformable mirror conjugation position is found to be near the posterior corneal surface. Chromatic aberration analysis is also presented, and our findings indicate that the polychromatic simulation quality is similar to that of the monochromatic case, even though the mirror is a reflective component. The limitations of a single continuous surface deformable mirror to mimic a contact lens are outlined, with some recommendations for improving the quality of simulation.

Visual and refractive outcomes following implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens

Background

Independence from all optical aids, and freedom from unwanted symptoms, following cataract and lens surgery remains the ultimate goal of both patient and surgeon. The development of trifocal IOL technology provides an ever-increasing range of options. The purpose of our study is to understand the predictability, safety and efficacy of a new trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) following cataract or refractive lens exchange (RLE) surgery.

Methods

This was a retrospective consecutive case series of patients undergoing cataract extraction or RLE followed by implantation of the Alcon IQ Panoptix IOL. Pre and postoperative refractive and visual parameters were recorded and evaluated. As the cohort followed a normal distribution, standard parametric tests were used. Paired t-test was used to compare the difference between target and postoperative refractive errors. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications was also reported.

Results

The IOL was implanted in 66 eyes of 33 patients. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -0.08 ± 0.25 dioptres (D). This was not significantly different from the target refraction (p = 0.841). Sixty-five percent of patients were within ± 0.25 D of the target SE refraction with 100% within ± 0.50 D of intended correction. Mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.01 ± 0.10 LogMAR. All patients achieved an unaided distance acuity of 20/40 or better postoperatively. Binocularly, 100% saw 0.20 LogMAR or better at near without correction and 88.9% achieved this level for uncorrected intermediate visual acuity. No intraoperative complications were noted. Five patients complained of moderate haloes in the early postoperative period.

Conclusion

The AcrySof IQ Panoptix IOL provides functional uncorrected visual acuity at distance, intermediate and near positions. Our results remain equivalent with existing trifocal IOL outcomes and provide surgeons with a further IOL alternative for the patient motivated to obtain true spectacle independence. Surgeons should consider individual reading and working requirements when counselling patients preoperatively to optimise postoperative patient satisfaction.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40662-017-0076-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

In vitro optical performance of a new aberration-free intraocular lens

PURPOSE

To assess the optical performance of the new EnVista intraocular lens (IOL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four aspheric IOLs were evaluated; the new EnVista is one amoung them. This IOL, similarly to the Z-Flex HB and the Bi-Flex 1.8 667AB ones, has a neutral aspheric design, whereas the fourth IOL under test (AcrySof IQ IOL SN60WF) presents a negative spherical aberration (SA). The IOL's aberration patterns were measured in vitro, by setting them up on an optical bench. From these aberration-pattern data, the modulation transfer function (MTF), the average modulation values, and the points spread function (PSF) were calculated. Furthermore, in order to assess the potential optical quality that these IOLs would yield once they are implanted, an average corneal-aberration pattern was juxtaposed to the in-vitro profiles and the same parameters were calculated again.

RESULTS

For the IOL-only scenario (ie, without including the corneal factor), it was the EnVista IOL, which is aberration-free that showed the higher MTF, PSF values. This was followed by the other two aberration-free IOL models. However, when the effect of an average corneal pattern was also taken into consideration, the AcrySof IQ IOL SN60WF always outperformed the other neutral-asphericity IOLs.

CONCLUSIONS

The in-vitro optical performance of the EnVista IOL was good, but it decreases substantially in a whole-eye scenario, when the wavefront profile of an average cornea is added. Other designs with different degrees of SA should be considered for this IOL in order to surpass these results.

Optical quality comparison between spherical and aspheric toric intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To measure and compare the optical quality of spherical and aspheric toric intraocular lenses (IOLs).

METHODS

Wavefront aberrations of AcrySof Toric and IQ Toric IOLs (Alcon Laboratories) for different powers were measured at 3- and 5-mm pupils by Nimo TR0805 instrument. The Zernike coefficients of trefoil, coma, tetrafoil, secondary astigmatism, and spherical aberration were evaluated. The point spread functions (PSFs) of each IOL evaluated were calculated from the wavefront aberrations. The PSF images also were calculated from the IOL wavefront aberrations, adding the cornea's aberrations to simulate the optical quality after their implantation.

RESULTS

Spherical toric IOLs showed positive and aspheric toric IOLs negative spherical aberrations. Statistically significant differences were found in spherical aberration root mean square (RMS) values between spherical and aspheric IOLs for both pupil sizes (p<0.05). Aspheric toric IOLs showed higher spherical aberration RMS values. We found differences in PSF images between both IOL designs at 5-mm pupil. The PSFs corresponding to the aspheric toric IOLs showed more spread out than the PSFs corresponding to the spherical toric IOLs. However, when corneal aberrations were added, aspheric toric IOLs showed better optical quality than spherical toric IOLs.

CONCLUSIONS

At 3-mm pupil, the optical quality between the IOL designs was similar, but at 5-mm pupil the optical quality was higher for spherical IOLs than aspheric IOLs. However, when theoretical corneal aberrations were added, aspheric toric IOLs showed better optical quality than spherical toric IOLs, due to the compensation between aspheric toric IOL negative spherical aberration and corneal positive spherical aberration.

Crystalens HD intraocular lens analysis using an adaptive optics visual simulator

PURPOSE

To compare visual and optical quality of the Crystalens HD intraocular lens (IOL) with that of a monofocal IOL.

METHODS

The wavefront aberration patterns of the monocular Akreos Adapt AO IOL and the single-optic accommodating Crystalens HD IOL were measured in a model eye. The Crystalens IOL was measured in its nonaccommodative state and then, after flexing the haptic to produce 1.4 mm of movement, in its accommodative state. Using an adaptive optics system, subjects' aberrations were removed and replaced with those of pseudophakes viewing with either lens. Monocular distance visual acuity (DVA) at high (100%), medium (50%), and low (10%) contrast and contrast sensitivity (CS) were measured for both IOL optics. Near VA (NVA) and CS were measured for the Crystalens HD IOL in its accommodative state. Depth of focus around the distance and near focus was also evaluated for the Crystalens HD IOL. Modulation transfer function (MTF), point spread function (PSF), and Strehl ratio were also calculated. All measures were taken for 3- and 5-mm pupils.

RESULTS

The MTF, PSF, and Strehl ratio showed comparable values between IOLs (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in DVA and CS between IOLs for all contrasts and pupils (p > 0.05). When spherically focused, mean DVA and NVA with the Crystalens HD IOL were ≥20/20 at 100 and 50% contrasts for both pupils. Monocular DVA, NVA, and CS were slightly better with 3- than 5-mm pupils, but without statistically significant differences. The Crystalens HD IOL showed about 0.75 and 0.50 D of depth of focus in its accommodative state and nonaccommodative state, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The optical and visual quality with the nonaccommodatied Crystalens HD IOL was comparable to that of a monofocal IOL. If this lens can move 1.4 mm in the eye, it will provide high-quality optics for near vision as well.

Optical and visual quality of the visian implantable collamer lens using an adaptive-optics visual simulator

PURPOSE

To evaluate visual and optical quality of the implantable collamer lens for different powers and sizes of incision surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective study in humans.

METHODS

An adaptive optics visual simulator was used to measure 3 powers of implantable collamer lenses and simulate the implantable collamer lens wavefront aberration's pattern for small- and large-incision surgery. Visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity were measured in 11 observers for 3- and 5-mm pupils. Modulation transfer function, point spread function, and Strehl ratio were calculated.

RESULTS

At 3 mm pupil, no statistically significant differences were found between both incision sizes for any implantable collamer lens power, except for -15 diopter (D) implantable collamer lens at 25 cycles/degree (cpd) (P < .05). At 5 mm pupil, statistically significant differences in Strehl ratio, VA, and contrast sensitivity were found between both incision sizes for all implantable collamer lens powers (P < .05). The outcomes were better with small incision. Implantable collamer lens power also affected the optical and visual quality. At 3 mm pupil, no statistically significant differences were found in VA and contrast sensitivity between implantable collamer lens powers, except between -3 and -15 D at low-contrast VA and at 20 and 25 cpd (P < .05). At 5 mm pupil, no statistically significant differences were found in Strehl ratio, VA, and contrast sensitivity between -3 and -6 D implantable collamer lens, but they did become apparent for -15 D implantable collamer lens for both incision sizes, all contrasts and spatial frequencies (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The implantable collamer lens provides good optical and visual quality, although these outcomes decreased with large-incision surgery because of the increase of aberrations.

Myopic astigmatism correction: comparison of a Toric Implantable Collamer Lens and a bioptics technique by an adaptive optics visual simulator

PURPOSE

To compare the optical and visual quality of a simulated Toric Implantable Collamer Lens (TICL) and a bioptics technique to treat high myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

An adaptive optics visual simulator was used to simulate the vision after TICL implantation and a bioptics procedure from the wavefront aberration pattern for moderate and high-myopic astigmatism. Visual acuity (VA) at different contrasts and contrast sensitivity (CS) at 10, 20 and 25 cycles degree(-1) were measured for 3 and 5-mm pupils. Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and Point Spread Function (PSF) were calculated for a 5-mm pupil.

RESULTS

At a 3-mm pupil we only found statistically significant differences in VA between the two simulated surgeries at low-contrast for moderate- and high-myopic astigmatism (p < 0.05). Statistically significant differences were found in CS at 3-mm pupil between both procedures at the highest spatial frequency for moderate-myopic astigmatism and at all frequencies for high-myopic astigmatism (p < 0.05). At a 5-mm pupil we found statistically significant differences in VA and CS between both simulated surgeries at all contrasts and frequencies evaluated for both groups (p < 0.05). In all cases VA and CS were better with the TICL than with the bioptics technique. MTFs for the bioptics technique were worse than those computed for the TICL. The TICL showed less spread out of the PSF than the bioptics procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulated TICL and bioptics procedures provided good optical and visual quality, although TICL implantation provided slightly better outcomes than the bioptics procedure, especially when the pupil diameter was increased.

Visual simulation through an aspheric aberration-correcting intraocular lens in subjects with different corneal profiles using adaptive optics

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyse the visual quality of the AcrySof IQ SN60WF(®) intraocular lens (IOL) when combined with different corneal profiles.

METHODS

Ten eyes of 10 participants with no prior history of refractive or cataract surgery were evaluated. An adaptive optics visual simulator was used to simulate the wavefront aberration pattern of an aspheric aberration-correcting IOL (AcrySof IQ SN60WF(®)). Normal corneas (group A), low and high myopic corneal ablations (groups B and C, respectively) and low and high hyperopic corneal ablations (groups D and E, respectively) were also simulated. Monocular distance visual acuities at 100, 50 and 10 per cent of contrast were measured.

RESULTS

At 100, 50 and 10 per cent contrast, no differences were found between groups A and B (p > 0.06 for all contrasts). Group A obtained better values than groups C, D and E for all contrasts (p = 0.031, p = 0.038, p = 0.032 at 100, 50 and 10 per cent of contrast, respectively). At the same time, group B obtained better values than groups C, D and E (p = 0.041, p = 0.042, p = 0.036 at 100, 50 and 10 per cent of contrast, respectively). Within the five groups, the worst results were always obtained for group E (p = 0.017, p = 0.021 and p = 0.025 at 100, 50 and 10 per cent of contrast, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the aspheric aberration-correcting IOL studied provides comparable results, when it is combined with normal corneas and with corneas with simulated low myopic ablations. When negative amounts of residual spherical aberration after cataract surgery are expected to be achieved, IOLs with more positive spherical aberration should be considered.

Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable Collamer lens and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using an adaptive optics visual simulator

Purpose. To compare optical and visual quality of the implantable Collamer lens (ICL) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. Methods. An adaptive optics visual simulator (CRX1, Imagine Eyes, France) was used to simulate the vision after ICL implantation and LASIK procedure from the wavefront aberration pattern for -3 and -6 D. Monocular visual acuity (VA) at different contrasts and contrast sensitivity (CS) at 10, 20, and 25 cycles/degree (cpd) were measured for 3- and 5-mm pupils. Modulation transfer function (MTF) and point spread function (PSF) were calculated for a 5-mm pupil. Results. The ICL showed a MTF near of diffraction-limited MTF, but the post-LASIK of MTF worsened moving away from both curves. Statistically significant differences were found in VA between both procedures for all conditions (p<0.05). For -3 D ICL and LASIK, we did not find statistically significant differences in CS between the procedures for both pupils and any spatial frequencies (p>0.05). But for -6 D ICL and LASIK, the effect of aberrations became apparent, finding statistically significant differences in CS between both procedures for 2 pupils and all spatial frequencies evaluated (p<0.05). In all cases optical and visual quality was better with the ICL procedure. Conclusions. Both ICL and LASIK procedures provide good optical and visual quality, although the ICL provides better outcomes, especially for large refractive errors and pupil sizes. These outcomes are due to the LASIK procedure inducing higher higher-order aberrations than ICL implantation.

Depth of focus through different intraocular lenses in patients with different corneal profiles using adaptive optics visual simulation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the depth of focus with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients with different corneal profiles using adaptive optics (AO) visual simulation.

METHODS

An AO visual simulator (crx1, Imagine Eyes) was used to simulate the aberration pattern of three monofocal IOLs (Acrysof IQ SN60WF [Alcon Laboratories Inc]; Akreos Adapt AO [Bausch & Lomb]; and Triplato [AJL Ophthalmic]) of different optic designs. Five groups were considered: patients without any corneal refractive surgery (normal cornea group) and with prior low and high myopic and hyperopic ablations (low myopic ablation, high myopic ablation, low hyperopic ablation, and high hyperopic ablation groups). Defocus curves for all situations were measured, with the target being moved from -5.00 to +2.50 diopters (D) in 0.25-D steps, and visual acuity was measured at all vergences.

RESULTS

Ten eyes from 10 patients were evaluated. The higher residual spherical aberration (SA) for all IOLs was obtained for the high myopic ablation group and the most negative residual SA was obtained for the high hyperopic ablation group. The best compromise between distance visual and depth of focus for the normal cornea, low myopic ablation, and high myopic ablation groups was obtained with the aspheric designs, whereas the best results for the low hyperopic and high hyperopic ablation groups were obtained with the spherical IOL.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the better compromise between distance visual acuity and depth of focus with the three IOLs and the different corneal profiles relies on a certain amount of positive SA. Above a certain limit of residual SA (positive or negative), visual acuity decreases at all vergences, worsening the depth of focus.