Small-aperture corneal inlay implantation to treat presbyopia after laser in situ keratomileusis

BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia: Management with corneal techniques

Corneal techniques for enhancing near and intermediate vision to correct presbyopia include surgical and contact lens treatment modalities. Broad approaches used independently or in combination include correcting one eye for distant and the other for near or intermediate vision, (termed monovision or mini-monovision depending on the degree of anisometropia) and/or extending the eye's depth of focus [1]. This report reviews the evidence for the treatment profile, safety, and efficacy of the current range of corneal techniques for managing presbyopia. The visual needs and expectations of the patient, their ocular characteristics, and prior history of surgery are critical considerations for patient selection and preoperative evaluation. Contraindications to refractive surgery include unstable refraction, corneal abnormalities, inadequate corneal thickness for the proposed ablation depth, ocular and systemic co-morbidities, uncontrolled mental health issues and unrealistic patient expectations. Laser refractive options for monovision include surface/stromal ablation techniques and keratorefractive lenticule extraction. Alteration of spherical aberration and multifocal ablation profiles are the primary means for increasing ocular depth of focus, using surface and non-surface laser refractive techniques. Corneal inlays use either small aperture optics to increase depth of field or modify the anterior corneal curvature to induce corneal multifocality. In presbyopia correction by conductive keratoplasty, radiofrequency energy is applied to the mid-peripheral corneal stroma, leading to mid-peripheral corneal shrinkage and central corneal steepening. Hyperopic orthokeratology lens fitting can induce spherical aberration and correct some level of presbyopia. Postoperative management, and consideration of potential complications, varies according to technique applied and the time to restore corneal stability, but a minimum of 3 months of follow-up is recommended after corneal refractive procedures. Ongoing follow-up is important in orthokeratology and longer-term follow-up may be required in the event of late complications following corneal inlay surgery.

Applications of the pinhole effect in clinical vision science

The pinhole effect is commonly used to discriminate uncorrected refractive error from ocular diseases. A small aperture limits the width of light beams entering the eye, thus increasing the depth of focus. The pinhole effect has also been used in spectacles, contact lenses, corneal inlays, and intraocular lenses (IOLs) to improve reading by compensating for loss of accommodative function. Pinhole spectacles improve near visual acuity, but reduce reading speed, increase interblink interval, and decrease tear break-up time. For contact lenses and IOLs, pinhole devices are usually used in the nondominant eye, which allow compensation of various refractive errors and decrease spectacle dependence. Pinhole corneal inlays are implanted during laser in situ keratomileusis or as a separate procedure. Pinhole IOLs are gaining popularity, particularly as they do not bring a risk of a local inflammatory reaction as corneal inlays do. Disadvantages of using the pinhole effect include high susceptibility to decentration, decrease in retinal luminance levels, and difficulties in performing fundus examinations or surgery in eyes with implanted devices. There are also concerns regarding perceptive issues with different retinal illuminances in the 2 eyes (the Pulfrich effect).

Surgical Technique to Treat Presbyopic Inlay-Associated Corneal Haze With Sequential Excimer Photoablation: A Case Series

PURPOSE

To describe an approach using sequential excimer laser ablation of the stromal surface of the corneal flap with or without subsequent excimer ablation to the stromal bed to reduce presbyopic inlay-associated corneal haze.

METHODS

Twelve patients who underwent KAMRA inlay (Acufocus) explantation due to corneal haze were included. The mean interval between explantation and the primary surgery (phototherapeutic keratotomy [PTK] to corneal flap) was 16.2 ± 29.7 months (range = 1 to 83 months). The corneal flap was lifted and laid on an evisceration spoon and an excimer laser was used to ablate the flap stroma by 30 to 40 µm depth. Subsequently, an excimer laser was used to ablate and treat the stromal bed following a second flap lift according to the manifest refraction, leaving a minimal residual stromal bed thickness of greater than 300 µm. For both procedures, mitomycin C 0.02% was applied to the stromal bed before the flap was replaced and a bandage contact lens applied.

RESULTS

Reductions in corneal haze were observed, following PTK to the corneal flap with or without photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to the stromal bed, both clinically and on imaging. No significant changes in uncorrected distance visual acuity (P = .442) and corrected distance visual acuity (P = .565) were observed. Improvements were observed for both spherical equivalent refractive errors (P = .036) and corneal light backscatter (P = .019). There were significant improvements in spherical aberrations (P = .014) but no changes in total lower and higher order aberrations.

CONCLUSIONS

PTK to the corneal flap with or without subsequent stromal bed PRK is an effective technique in treating corneal haze following presbyopic inlay explantation. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(9):639-646.].

Complications of Small Aperture Intracorneal Inlays: A Literature Review

Presbyopia can be defined as the refractive state of the eye in which, due to a physiological decrease in the ability to accommodate, it is not possible to sustain vision without fatigue in a prolonged manner, along with difficulty focusing near vision. It is estimated that its prevalence in 2030 will be approximately 2.1 billion people. Corneal inlays are an alternative in the correction of presbyopia. They are implanted beneath a laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap or in a pocket in the center of the cornea of the non-dominant eye. The purpose of this review is to provide information about intraoperative and postoperative KAMRA inlay complications in the available scientific literature. A search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus with the following search strategy: ("KAMRA inlay" OR "KAMRA" OR "corneal inlay pinhole" OR "pinhole effect intracorneal" OR "SAICI" OR "small aperture intracorneal inlay") AND ("complication" OR "explantation" OR "explanted" OR "retired"). The bibliography consulted shows that the insertion of a KAMRA inlay is an effective procedure that improves near vision with a slight decrease in distance vision. However, postoperative complications such as corneal fibrosis, epithelial iron deposits, and stromal haze are described.

Review of surgical devices using small aperture optics

Small aperture optics work by blocking unfocused peripheral light rays while allowing central light rays to focus on the retina. This pinhole effect creates an extended depth of focus and has been used in presbyopia correction, improving intermediate and near vision without markedly affecting distance vision. Another beneficial effect of small aperture optics is reducing aberrations caused by irregular corneas or irregular pupils. The first small aperture surgical device was the Kamra corneal inlay used on the nondominant eyes of presbyopic emmetropes. The pinhole concept was also adapted into the IC-8 intraocular lens (IOL) for presbyopia correction during cataract surgery and by the XtraFocus piggyback device to lessen unwanted aberrations in eyes with irregular corneas or pupils. The IC-8 IOL can be placed monocularly or binocularly with mini-monovision for further near vision improvement. The XtraFocus piggyback device can be placed either in the sulcus or capsular bag. The aim of this literature review is to synthesize evidence on the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes on surgical devices utilizing small aperture optics. A comprehensive search on PubMed was conducted with the keywords “small aperture optics,” “small aperture corneal inlay,” “small aperture IOL,” “Kamra corneal inlay,” “IC-8 IOL,” and “XtraFocus.” In this review, we describe the progression of small aperture surgical devices, patient criteria, visual outcomes, complications, satisfaction, and recommendations for surgical success.

Presbyopia management with Q-factor modulation without additive monovision: One-year visual and refractive results

PURPOSE

To analyze refractive results after hyperopic presbyopia surgery by Q-factor modulation without additive monovision.

SETTING

Quinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital, Paris, France.

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized study.

METHODS

Forty-five hyperopic presbyopic patients not tolerating monovision were included. The target for the dominant eye was emmetropia, whereas that for the nondominant eye was emmetropia associated with a target Q factor of -0.8. The postoperative follow-up included assessments of spherical equivalent (SE) refraction, monocular and binocular corrected and uncorrected (UDVA) distance visual acuities, and binocular corrected and uncorrected (UNVA) near visual acuities. Corneal pachymetry, topography, aberrometry and an analysis of patient satisfaction were performed at the 12-month examination.

RESULTS

The study comprised 90 eyes of 45 consecutive patients. The mean age at surgery was 53.8 years ± 4.99 (SD). The mean preoperative SE was +2.33 ± 1.16 diopters (D) in the dominant eyes and +2.26 ± 1.17 D in the nondominant eyes. At 12 months postoperatively, 42 patients (93%) had a binocular UDVA of Snellen 20/20 and 37 patients (82%) had a binocular UNVA of Jaeger 2 (Parinaud 3). The mean SE at 12 months was -0.22 ± 0.35 D in the dominant eyes (P < .0001) and -0.83 ± 0.50 D in the nondominant eyes (P < .0001). Two eyes required retreatment. Overall, 39 patients (87%) said that they were satisfied and would recommend the intervention.

CONCLUSION

The Q-factor modulation without additive monovision aims to compensate for presbyopia by changing the Q factor of the nondominant eye to generate a greater depth of field in hyperopic presbyopic patients who are unable to tolerate monovision. The visual outcomes and quality of vision were satisfactory, and only a few patients required additional correction.

Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon

Presbyopia results from loss or insufficiency of the eye's accommodative ability, and clinically manifests as the inability to focus near objects on the retina. It is one of the most common causes of visual impairment worldwide especially in adults of productive or working age. Various means of compensating for the loss of accommodative ability have been devised from optical tools such as spectacles and contact lenses, to topical medications and to surgical procedures. A comprehensive search on journal articles about topical and surgical correction of presbyopia was undertaken. The various techniques for presbyopia correction, as enumerated in these articles, are discussed in this paper with the addition of our personal experience and perspective on the future of these techniques.

Review of Static Approaches to Surgical Correction of Presbyopia

Presbyopia is the primary cause of reduction in the quality of life of people in their 40s, due to dependence on spectacles. Therefore, presbyopia correction has become an evolving and rapidly progressive field in refractive surgery. There are two primary options for presbyopia correction: the dynamic approach uses the residual accommodative capacity of the eye, and the static approach attempts to enhance the depth of focus of the optical system. The dynamic approach attempts to reverse suspected pathophysiologic changes. Dynamic approaches such as accommodative intraocular lenses (IOLs), scleral expansion techniques, refilling, and photodisruption of the crystalline lens have attracted less clinical interest due to inconsistent results and the complexity of the techniques. We have reviewed the most popular static techniques in presbyopia surgery, including multifocal IOLs, PresbyLASIK, and corneal inlays, but we should emphasize that these techniques are very different from the physiologic status of an untouched eye. A systematic PubMed search for the keywords “presbylasik”, “multifocal IOL”, and “presbyopic corneal inlay” revealed 634 articles; 124 were controlled clinical trials, 95 were published in the previous 10 years, and 78 were English with available full text. We reviewed the abstracts and rejected the unrelated articles; other references were included as needed. This narrative review compares different treatments according to available information on the optical basis of each treatment modality, including the clinical outcomes such as near, intermediate, and far visual acuity, spectacles independence, quality of vision, and dysphotopic phenomena.

Long-term Results of Combined LASIK and Monocular Small-Aperture Corneal Inlay Implantation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of combined LASIK and small-aperture intracorneal inlay implantation (KAMRA; AcuFocus, Irvine, CA) for the surgical compensation of presbyopia and refractive errors.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all ametropic, presbyopic patients who underwent combined LASIK and KAMRA inlay implantation at a single clinic. Demographic data and preoperative uncorrected and corrected monocular and binocular near and distance visual acuity (UNVA, UDVA, and CDVA) with manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) were collected and analyzed. All perioperative adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 132 patients were available (median age: 56 years; interquartile range (IQR) ± 5; range: 44 to 68 years). Median preoperative MRSE was +1.37± 1.20 diopters (D). The majority (113; 85%) were hypermetropic. Preoperative median UNVA improved from N24 (J13) ±6 to N6 (J5) ±1 by day 1 postoperatively, remaining stable throughout follow-up. At last follow-up, 97% of patients achieved UNVA of N5 (J3) or better. Median UDVA (implanted eye) improved from 20/40 (0.50 ± 0.41 on the decimal chart) preoperatively to 20/25 (0.80 ± 0.13) at month 12. Binocular UDVA was 20/20 in 88%, with CDVA unchanged for 84% at 12 months. No patient lost more than one line of CDVA. MRSE was also stable, albeit +0.25 D off-target refraction (-0.75 D). Two inlays were explanted due to suboptimal adaptation/corneal haze.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this follow-up study show that combined insertion of a small-aperture corneal inlay with LASIK in presbyopic patients improves near vision with a slight compromise in distance vision in the implanted eye. Overall, it appears to be a safe, effective procedure for the treatment of presbyopia. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(6):379-384.].

Corneal Refractive Procedures for the Treatment of Presbyopia

Purpose:

Refractive surgery has been in use for a long time and is evolving at a fast pace with several new corneal procedures being used for the correction of presbyopia. The purpose of this article is to give a comprehensive review of the literature to evaluate the outcome and success of different corneal refractive surgical procedures in presbyopic patients.

Methods:

We performed a comprehensive search on PubMed to identify published reports of the various procedures utilized in the past and present to correct presbyopia. The outcomes of these procedures were recorded.

Results and conclusion:

We found that varying rates of success have been reported with these procedures. The results of our exhaustive search are presented in this report for review.

A Review of Presbyopia Treatment with Corneal Inlays

The prevalence of presbyopia continues to increase every year. The therapeutic approaches to presbyopia cover the spectrum of non-surgical to surgical techniques. With recent advances in biocompatible materials, corneal inlays make a strong case for their place within the treatment spectrum. This article takes a closer look at three of the current corneal inlay models: KAMRA, Raindrop, and Presbia Flexivue Microlens. Each design approach and mode of action is described with data from key clinical trials. Furthermore, the ability to choose the most suitable corneal inlay is presented by comparing each model and identifying their similarities and differences. The article then concludes by touching on the future of corneal inlays, looking at associated conditions and complications and how to manage them, as well as an expert’s personal point of view of enhanced ideas for continuing the growth and success of corneal inlays in the market.

Short-term visual result after simultaneous photorefractive keratectomy and small-aperture cornea inlay implantation

PURPOSE

To report the short-term results of simultaneous photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and small-aperture cornea inlay implantation (KAMRA) surgery in treating presbyopia.

METHODS

Simultaneous PRK and KAMRA inlay surgery was performed on 21 patients from July 2015 to March 2016. Follow-up exams were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Our patients were also divided preoperatively into three categories: myopic, hyperopic, and emmetropic. Over the 6-month period, the main outcome measures were uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), changes in best-corrected distance visual acuity, and mean spherical equivalent refraction.

RESULTS

At 6-month follow-up, 83% (10/12) of patients had a monocular UNVA of 20/40 or better, and 75% had a binocular UNVA of 20/40 (J5) or better. At 6 months, the overall mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -0.60 D (±0.42 standard deviation [SD], range: -1.38 to -0.13) with a mean change of -0.43 D (±1.19 SD, range: -1.5 to 2.63) compared to preoperative data. Overall, 91% (10/11) of patients were within a ±0.5 D range of our target -0.75 D for KAMRA use. One-hundred percent (5/5) of the hyperopes, 50% (1/2) of emmetropes, and 100% (4/4) of myopes met the targeted range. At 6 months, the MRSE for the hyperopic subgroup (n=5) was 0.33 D (±0.20 SD), the MRSE for the emmetropic subgroup (n=2) was -1.19 D (±0.19 SD), and the MRSE for the myopic subgroup (n=4) was -0.66 D (±0.36 SD).

CONCLUSION

Based on preliminary results and a small sample size, it seems that simultaneous PRK and KAMRA is effective and predictable. There are multiple advantages in performing simultaneous PRK and KAMRA including a shorter recovery time and less steroid use than the two surgeries performed separately.

Cataract surgery on the previous corneal refractive surgery patient

Cataract surgery in cases with previous corneal refractive surgery may be a major challenge for the ophthalmologist. The refractive outcome of the case deserves special attention in the preoperative planning process, which should be tailored for the type of prior refractive procedure: incisional, ablative under a flap, or on the corneal surface. Avoiding refractive surprise after cataract surgery in these cases is principally dependent on the accuracy of the intraocular lens calculation, together with the selection of the appropriate biometric formula for each case. Modern techniques for cataract surgery help surgeons to move toward the goal of cataract surgery as a refractive procedure free from refractive error. We give practical guidelines for the cataract surgeon in the management of these challenging cases.

Clinical utility of the KAMRA corneal inlay

The treatment of presbyopia has been the focus of much scientific and clinical research over recent years, not least due to an increasingly aging population but also the desire for spectacle independence. Many lens and nonlens-based approaches have been investigated, and with advances in biomaterials and improved surgical methods, removable corneal inlays have been developed. One such development is the KAMRA™ inlay where a small entrance pupil is exploited to create a pinhole-type effect that increases the depth of focus and enables improvement in near visual acuity. Short- and long-term clinical studies have all reported significant improvement in near and intermediate vision compared to preoperative measures following monocular implantation (nondominant eye), with a large proportion of patients achieving Jaeger (J) 2 to J1 (~0.00 logMAR to ~0.10 logMAR) at the final follow-up. Although distance acuity is reduced slightly in the treated eye, binocular visual acuity and function remain very good (mean 0.10 logMAR or better). The safety of the inlay is well established and easily removable, and although some patients have developed corneal changes, these are clinically insignificant and the incidence appears to reduce markedly with advancements in KAMRA design, implantation technique, and femtosecond laser technology. This review aims to summarize the currently published peer-reviewed studies on the safety and efficacy of the KAMRA inlay and discusses the surgical and clinical outcomes with respect to the patient’s visual function.

One-year results of simultaneous laser in situ keratomileusis and small-aperture corneal inlay implantation for hyperopic presbyopia: comparison by age

PURPOSE

To compare by age the safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction after simultaneous laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and small-aperture corneal inlay implantation (Kamra) for hyperopic presbyopia.

SETTING

Shinagawa LASIK Center, Tokyo, Japan.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative cohort study.

METHODS

Simultaneous LASIK and small-aperture corneal inlay implantation were performed in the nondominant eye of hyperopic presbyopic patients with astigmatism. Patients were divided into groups by age as follows: Group 1 (40 to 49 years), Group 2 (50 to 59 years), and Group 3 (60 to 65 years). The uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and patient questionnaire results were compared.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 277 eyes of 277 patients. All groups achieved a mean UDVA of 20/20, with Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 gaining 1 line, 2 lines, and 3 lines, respectively. The mean UNVA was J2 with 4 lines gained in Group 1 and J3 with 5 lines gained in Group 2 and Group 3. The mean CDVA and corrected near visual acuity remained the same as at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous LASIK and small-aperture corneal inlay implantation for hyperopic presbyopia was a safe and effective treatment option. Although the outcomes were comparable between groups, Group 3 had the largest gain in UDVA and UNVA and the highest patient satisfaction, despite having the lowest reduction in dependence on reading glasses. Taking age into account might help achieve optimum postoperative outcomes and improved patient satisfaction.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Dr. Tomita is a consultant to Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Acufocus, Inc., and Schwind eye-tech-solutions GmbH and Co. KG. Dr. Waring is a consultant to Acufocus, Inc.

Early-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis and late-onset infectious keratitis in astigmatic keratotomy incision following femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

A 79-year-old woman had uneventful femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery including paired laser astigmatic keratotomies (AKs) in the right eye. Three weeks postoperatively, a corneal infiltrate developed in the superotemporal AK incision. Cultures grew methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The infection was treated with topical fortified vancomycin and tobramycin; full resolution required several months of therapy. Five months after cataract surgery, the patient presented with a second stromal infiltrate, also in the superotemporal AK incision. Despite negative cultures, the infiltrate resolved quickly on a short course of broad-spectrum fortified antibiotics. At 6 months, the corrected distance visual acuity was 20/30. This case demonstrates that infectious keratitis can occur following uneventful femtosecond laser-assisted AK performed concurrently with cataract surgery. We reviewed the literature on infectious keratitis following refractive keratotomy and femtosecond laser-assisted procedures. Several recommendations to prevent these infections are proposed.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Presbyopic LASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatments

PURPOSE

To evaluate distance and near image quality after hybrid bi-aspheric multifocal central presbyLASIK treatments.

DESIGN

Consecutive case series.

METHODS

Sixty-four eyes of 32 patients consecutively treated with central presbyLASIK were assessed. The mean age of the patients was 51 ± 3 years with a mean spherical equivalent refraction of -1.08 ± 2.62 diopters (D) and mean astigmatism of 0.52 ± 0.42 D. Monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corrected near visual acuity (CNVA), and distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) of nondominant eyes; binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA); uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA); distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA); and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Subjective quality of vision and near vision was assessed using the 10-item Rasch-scaled Quality of Vision and Near Activity Visual Questionnaire, respectively.

RESULTS

At 1 year postoperatively, 93% of patients achieved 20/20 or better binocular UDVA; 90% and 97% of patients had J2 or better UNVA and UIVA, respectively; 7% lost 2 Snellen lines of CDVA; Strehl ratio reduced by ∼-4% ± 14%. Defocus curves revealed a loss of half a Snellen line at best focus, with no change for intermediate vergence (-1.25 D) and a mean gain of 2 lines for near vergence (-3 D).

CONCLUSIONS

Presbyopic treatment using a hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile is safe and efficacious. The postoperative outcomes indicate improvements in binocular vision at far, intermediate, and near distances with improved contrast sensitivity. A 19% retreatment rate should be considered to increase satisfaction levels, besides a 3% reversal rate.

IURead: a new computer-based reading test

PURPOSE

To develop a computer-based single sentence reading test especially designed for clinical research enabling multiple repeat trials without reusing the same sentences.

METHODS

We initially developed 422 sentences, with an average of 60 characters and 12 words. Presentation controls were improved by employing computer-based testing and the oral reading was recorded by visual inspection of digital audio recordings. Variability in reading speed of normally sighted adults between sentences, between charts, between subjects, between formats, and between display devices was quantified. The impact of display size and pixel resolution on test geometry was assessed, and the impact of reduced retinal image quality and retinal illuminance were compared for reading and standard letter acuities. Eleven visually normal subjects (age: 18-60 years) participated in this study.

RESULTS

Stopwatch timing of sentences reliably underestimated reading times by about 0.3 s, and exhibited coefficients of repeatability 17 times larger than those estimated from visual inspection of digital recordings. A slight relaxing of the lexical content constraints had no effect on reading speed; neither did sentence format (single vs three lines) or display size or distance. Within subject standard deviations of reading speed for different sentences were small (between 6% and 9% of the mean speed) requiring only small samples sizes to achieve typical statistical reliability and power when comparing conditions within individual subjects. The greater variability associated with stopwatch timing necessitates larger sample sizes. As defocus and light level were varied, reading acuity and standard letter acuity were highly correlated (r(2)  = 0.99), and reading acuity was slightly better.

DISCUSSION

A computer-based IURead reading test provides a useful reading speed and reading acuity tool for clinical research involving multiple conditions and repeat testing of individual subjects. Ready to use IURead files for use with a computer, tablet or cell phone can be downloaded from our lab website (https://www.opt.indiana.edu/Bradley/Downloads.aspx).

The role of sensory ocular dominance on through-focus visual performance in monovision presbyopia corrections

Monovision presbyopia interventions exploit the binocular nature of the visual system by independently manipulating the optical properties of the two eyes. It is unclear, however, how individual variations in ocular dominance affect visual function in monovision corrections. Here, we examined the impact of sensory ocular dominance on visual performance in both traditional and modified monovision presbyopic corrections. We recently developed a binocular adaptive optics vision simulator to correct subjects' native aberrations and induce either modified monovision (1.5 D anisometropia, spherical aberration of +0.1 and -0.4 μm in distance and near eyes, respectively, over 4 mm pupils) or traditional monovision (1.5 D anisometropia). To quantify both the sign and the degree of ocular dominance, we utilized binocular rivalry to estimate stimulus contrast ratios that yield balanced dominance durations for the two eyes. Through-focus visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured under two conditions: (a) assigning dominant and nondominant eye to distance and near, respectively, and (b) vice versa. The results revealed that through-focus visual acuity was unaffected by ocular dominance. Contrast sensitivity, however, was significantly improved when the dominant eye coincided with superior optical quality. We hypothesize that a potential mechanism behind this observation is an interaction between ocular dominance and binocular contrast summation, and thus, assignment of the dominant eye to distance or near may be an important factor to optimize contrast threshold performance at different object distances in both modified and traditional monovision.

Corneal inlay implantation complicated by infectious keratitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To report five cases of infectious keratitis following corneal inlay implantation for the surgical correction of presbyopia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational case series. Five eyes of five patients were identified consecutively in two emergency departments during a 1-year period, from November 2013 to November 2014. Patients' demographics, clinical features, treatment and outcomes are described.

RESULTS

There were four female patients and one male, aged 52-64 years. Three patients had the KAMRA inlay (AcuFocus) and two had the Flexivue Microlens inlay (Presbia Coöperatief U.A.) inserted for the treatment of presbyopia and they presented from 6 days to 4 months postoperatively. Presenting uncorrected vision ranged from 6/38 to counting fingers. One patient's corneal scrapings were positive for a putatively causative organism, Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum, and all patients responded to broad-spectrum fortified topical antibiotics. All patients lost vision with final uncorrected visual acuity ranging from 6/12 to 6/60 and best-corrected vision ranging from 6/7.5 to 6/12. Two patients' corneal inlays were explanted and three remained in situ at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Infectious keratitis can occur at an early or late stage following corneal inlay implantation. Final visual acuity can be limited by stromal scarring; in the cases where the infiltrate was small and off the visual axis at the time of presentation, the final visual acuity was better than those patients who presented with larger lesions affecting the visual axis. Though infection may necessitate removal of the inlay, early positive response to treatment may enable the inlay to be left in situ.

Femtosecond laser in refractive and cataract surgeries

In the past few years, 9 unique laser platforms have been brought to the market. As femtosecond (FS) laser-assisted ophthalmic surgery potentially improves patient safety and visual outcomes, this new technology indeed provides ophthalmologists a reliable new option. But this new technology also poses a range of new clinical and financial challenges for surgeons. We provide an overview of the evolution of FS laser technology for use in refractive and cataract surgeries. This review describes the available laser platforms and mainly focuses on discussing the development of ophthalmic surgery technologies.

Long-term outcomes after monocular corneal inlay implantation for the surgical compensation of presbyopia

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term outcomes of small-aperture corneal inlay implantation for the surgical compensation of presbyopia.

SETTING

Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

DESIGN

Prospective interventional cohort study.

METHODS

Monocular implantation of a Kamra small-aperture inlay (model ACI7000) (1.6 mm central aperture) was performed in emmetropic presbyopic eyes. The preoperative and postoperative parameters included monocular and binocular uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), and uncorrected (UNVA) and corrected (CNVA) near visual acuities; refraction; patient satisfaction; and complications.

RESULTS

From September 4, 2006, to May 21, 2007, a small-aperture inlay (1.6 mm central aperture) was implanted in 32 emmetropic presbyopic eyes. The mean binocular uncorrected visual acuities improved as follows: UNVA from Jaeger (J) 6 ± 1.2 lines (∼20/50) to J2 ± 1.8 lines (∼20/25) (P < .001) and UIVA from 0.2 logMAR ± 1.3 lines (∼20/32) to 0.1 logMAR ± 1.3 lines (∼20/25) (P = .04). The UDVA decreased from -0.2 logMAR ± 0.2 lines (∼20/12.5) to -0.1 logMAR ± 0.6 lines (∼20/16) (P < .001). At 60 months, 74.2% of patients had a UNVA of J3 (∼20/32) or better, 87.1% had a UIVA of 0.2 logMAR (∼20/32) or better, and 93.5% had a UDVA of 0.0 logMAR (∼20/20) or better. One inlay was removed after 36 months because of patient dissatisfaction with vision after a hyperopic shift in the surgical eye, with no loss of CDVA or CNVA 2 years after removal.

CONCLUSION

Long-term results of monocular corneal inlay implantation indicate increased UNVA and UIVA and slightly compromised UDVA in emmetropic presbyopic eyes.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Dr. Grabner was reimbursed for travel expenses from Acufocus. Dr. Riha is a consultant to Acufocus. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Surgical compensation of presbyopia with corneal inlays

Presbyopia, the physiological change in near vision that develops with ageing, gradually affects individuals older than 40 years and is a growing cause of visual disability due to ageing demographics of the global population. The routine use of computers and 'smartphones', combined with the affluence of the 'baby boomers' generation has set high standards for near vision correction. Corneal inlays are a relatively new treatment modality that is effective at compensating for presbyopia. The dimensions of these devices vary from 2 to 3.8 mm in diameter and 5 to 32 μm in thickness. They are implanted in the anterior corneal stroma of the non-dominant eye, most commonly, in a femtosecond laser created corneal pocket. They improve near vision by increasing the depth of focus, creating a hyper-prolate region of increased central cornea power or providing a refractive add power. This article reviews the literature on the efficacy and safety of corneal inlays.

Implantable inlay devices for presbyopia: the evidence to date

By 2020, it is estimated that 2.1 billion people will be presbyopic, and the demand for spectacle independence in this group is growing. This review article provides an overview of the three commercially available corneal inlays for the correction of presbyopia. Safety, efficacy, visual outcomes, and complications are analyzed for all three inlays according to published peer-reviewed data.

Two target locations for corneal inlay implantation combined with laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To compare the visual acuity outcomes between 2 target locations for corneal inlay implantation with concurrent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to compensate for presbyopia.

SETTING

Shinagawa LASIK Center, Tokyo, Japan.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Bilateral LASIK was performed simultaneously with inlay implantation in the nondominant eye. The preoperative and 6-month postoperative uncorrected distance (UDVA) and uncorrected near (UNVA) visual acuities were evaluated. Patients were divided into the following 2 groups based on the pupil center to Purkinje reflex distance (Pp-Pk): small (≤300 μm) and large (>300 μm). Each group was divided into subgroups according to the distance of the inlay center to the Purkinje reflex (I-Pk) or to the midpoint between the pupil center and Purkinje reflex (I-M). The inlay position was classified as 0 to 100 μm, 101 to 200 μm, 201 to 300 μm, and 301 to 400 μm from the Purkinje reflex and from the midpoint.

RESULTS

Of 1008 patients, 992 were available for postoperative follow-up. The UDVA and UNVA improved in both subgroups with all inlay positions (P < .0001). There were no statistically significant differences in UDVA or UNVA within or between the small Pp-Pk group and the large Pp-Pk group (P > .05). The Spearman rank-order correlation showed weak associations between the inlay distance and visual acuity.

CONCLUSION

The amount of inlay decentration had no influence on postoperative visual acuity.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Dr. Tomita is a consultant to Acufocus, Inc. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Surgical options for correction of refractive error following cataract surgery

Refractive errors are frequently found following cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange. Accurate biometric analysis, selection and calculation of the adequate intraocular lens (IOL) and modern techniques for cataract surgery all contribute to achieving the goal of cataract surgery as a refractive procedure with no refractive error. However, in spite of all these advances, residual refractive error still occasionally occurs after cataract surgery and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) can be considered the most accurate method for its correction. Lens-based procedures, such as IOL exchange or piggyback lens implantation are also possible alternatives especially in cases with extreme ametropia, corneal abnormalities, or in situations where excimer laser is unavailable. In our review, we have found that piggyback IOL is safer and more accurate than IOL exchange. Our aim is to provide a review of the recent literature regarding target refraction and residual refractive error in cataract surgery.

Management of residual refractive error after cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a review of the recent literature on the management of residual refractive error after cataract surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is the most accurate procedure to correct residual refractive error after cataract surgery. Lens-based procedures, such as intraocular lens (IOL) exchange or piggyback lens implantation, are also possible alternatives in cases with extreme ametropia, corneal abnormalities, or in situations where excimer laser is not available. In this review, we found that Piggyback IOL were safer and more accurate than IOL exchange.

SUMMARY

Emmetropia is our main target today in modern cataract surgery. Accurate biometric analysis, selection and calculation of the adequate IOL, and modern techniques for cataract surgery all help surgeons to move toward the goal of cataract surgery as a refractive procedure free from refractive error. However, in spite of all these inputs, residual refractive error still occasionally occurs after cataract surgery and LASIK seems to be the most accurate method for its correction.

Evaluating the short-term results of KAMRA inlay implantation using real-time optical coherence tomography-guided femtosecond laser technology

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes from using real-time optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided femtosecond laser technology for pocket creation for KAMRA inlay (Acufocus, Inc., Irvine, CA) implantation surgery.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-one eyes underwent KAMRA inlay implantation using the real-time OCT-guided femtosecond laser for pocket creation. All patients had a history of prior LASIK. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity, corrected near visual acuity, and manifest refraction spherical equivalent were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. The follow-up period was 3 months.

RESULTS

Mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent, uncorrected distance visual acuity, and uncorrected near visual acuity changed from -0.18 ± 0.33 to -0.95 ± 0.64, 20/16 to 20/20, and J8 to J2, respectively. Corrected distance visual acuity and corrected near visual acuity remained stable before and after KAMRA inlay implantation, 20/12 and J1, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using real-time OCT-guided femtosecond laser technology increases the safety and accuracy of corneal KAMRA inlay implantation surgery with a history of prior LASIK with excellent visual and refractive outcomes.

Current management of presbyopia

Presbyopia is a physiologic inevitability that causes gradual loss of accommodation during the fifth decade of life. The correction of presbyopia and the restoration of accommodation are considered the final frontier of refractive surgery. Different approaches on the cornea, the crystalline lens and the sclera are being pursued to achieve surgical correction of this disability. There are however, a number of limitations and considerations that have prevented widespread acceptance of surgical correction for presbyopia. The quality of vision, optical and visual distortions, regression of effect, complications such as corneal ectasia and haze, anisometropia after monovision correction, impaired distance vision and the invasive nature of the currently techniques have limited the utilization of presbyopia surgery. The purpose of this paper is to provide an update of current procedures available for presbyopia correction and their limitations.

Outcomes of small aperture corneal inlay implantation in patients with pseudophakia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the improvement in near visual acuity after KAMRA corneal inlay (AcuFocus, Inc., Irvine, CA) implantation in patients with pseudophakia.

METHODS

A retrospective study analysis of patients with pseudophakia undergoing monocular corneal inlay implantation in the non-dominant eye was performed. The inlay was implanted monocularly in the non-dominant eye of patients. Manifest refractive spherical equivalent, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity, and corrected near visual acuity were evaluated. The follow-up period was 3 months.

RESULTS

Thirteen eyes from 13 patients were evaluated. Four patients underwent LASIK for improved distance acuity at the time of inlay implantation. Mean uncorrected near visual acuity improved five lines (from J10 to J4) postoperatively. Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, and corrected near visual acuity remained stable and were 20/20, 20/16, and J1, respectively, before and after KAMRA implantation. Three eyes lost two lines and 1 eye lost one line of uncorrected distance visual acuity. Two eyes lost two lines and 1 eye lost 1 line of corrected distance visual acuity. Mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent changed before and after KAMRA implantation from -0.01 ± 1.07 diopters (D) (range: 2.25 to -1.88 D) to -1.12 ± 0.87 D (range: 0.25 to -2.75 D), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of a small aperture corneal inlay improved uncorrected near visual acuity while maintaining uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity in monofocal patients with pseudophakia.

Developments in the correction of presbyopia II: surgical approaches

PURPOSE

To discuss the various static and dynamic surgical approaches which attempt to give presbyopes good vision at far, intermediate and near viewing distances.

CONTENT

Static methods broadly adopt the same optical techniques as those used in presbyopic contact lens correction and aim to satisfy the needs of the presbyope by increasing binocular depth-of-focus, often using monovision as well as simultaneous-imagery. Dynamic methods generally attempt to make use of at least some of the still-active elements of the accommodation system. They include procedures which are supposed to modify the relative geometry of the ciliary muscle and lens, or which reduce the stiffness of the presbyopic lens either by replacing it with other natural or man-made material or by subjecting it to femtosecond laser treatment. Alternatively the natural lens may be replaced by some form of intraocular lens which changes power as a result of forces derived from the still-active ciliary muscle, zonule and capsule, or other sources.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, multifocal intraocular lenses appear to offer the most consistent and reliable surgical approach to surgical presbyopic correction. They have obvious advantages in convenience and stability over optically-similar, simultaneous-image presbyopic contact lenses but this must be balanced against their relative inflexibility in cases of patient dissatisfaction. Dynamic methods remain largely experimental. Although some approaches show promise, as yet no method has demonstrated a reliable, long-term ability to correct distance refractive error and to appropriately change ocular power in response to changes in viewing distance over the normal range of interest.

Presbyopic correction on the cornea

Purpose

The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize and appraise the evidence of the benefits of presbyopic correction on the cornea for visual function.

Summary

Comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE using keywords like “presbylasik”, “presbyopic refractive surgery”, “corneal pseudoaccommodation” and “corneal multifocality”. We reviewed corrected and uncorrected visual acuities for distance and near (uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), corrected near visual acuity (CNVA)), along with the refractive outcomes in spherical equivalent (SE) and astigmatism comparing the differences observed between preoperative myopic and hyperopic patients, as well as among techniques.

Thirty-one studies met the inclusion and quality criteria. Monovision provides excellent distance and near uncorrected acuities, but with a 17% retreatment and a 5% reversal rate. Initial multifocal ablations result in 12% loss of 2 or more lines of CDVA, and a 21% retreatment rate. Laser Blended Vision provides excellent UDVA, but with a 19% retreatment rate. Initial experiences with Supracor show moderate predictability and a 22% retreatment rate. Intracor results in 9% loss of 2 or more lines of CDVA. KAMRA provides excellent UDVA, with only a 1% retreatment rate, but a 6% reversal rate. Initial experiences with PresbyMAX provided excellent UNVA and DCNVA, showing excellent predictability and a 1% reversal rate.

Conclusions

The findings have implications for clinicians and policymakers in the health-care industry and emphasize the need for additional trials examining this important and widely performed clinical procedure.