Evaluation of the Abbott realtime HCV genotype II RUO (GT II) assay with reference to 5'UTR, core and NS5B sequencing

Genetic history of hepatitis C virus genotype 6 in Taiwan

Unlike hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 6, which is widely circulated in Southeast Asia and South China, GT 6 was not reported in Taiwan until 2006. GT 1b and 2a, also known as global HCV subtypes, have been reported as major GTs circulating in Taiwan. Because of improvement in genotyping kits and sequencing techniques for the subtyping of HCV, an increasing number of GT 6 subtypes have been reported, especially subtype 6a among intravenous drug users with human immunodeficiency virus infection after an outbreak since 2003. Thus, HCV GT 6 infection is regarded to be closely associated with injection drug use. However, recently, we found an unexpectedly high GT 6 prevalence in the general population in Tainan, southern Taiwan. Most of these GT 6 samples belonged to a putative novel subtype closely related to 6g and 6w instead of 6a. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that this putative 6g-related novel subtype and 6w could be indigenous in southern Taiwan for centuries. Southern Taiwan could be the origin of HCV subtype 6w. This finding might change the perspective of HCV epidemiology in Taiwan.

Unexpectedly High Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection, Southern Laos

During 2017-2019, a total of 88/753 (11.7%) of patients 5-90 years of age in hospitals in Saravan Province, Laos, were seropositive for hepatitis C virus antibodies. Viral RNA was found in 44 samples. Sequencing showed high diversity within genotype 6. We recommend exposure-risk investigations and targeted testing and treatment.

Indeterminate Prediction of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype by Commercial Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay Resolving by Sequencing to Avoid the Consequence of Inaccurate Typing

Pakistan is ranked second highest after Egypt in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Accurate typing is mandatory to be compliant with the World Health Organization strategy to eliminate HCV infection in 2030. We characterized the HCV genotypes using Abbott real-time polymerase chain reaction assay and indeterminate samples were sequenced. We also investigated the distribution of HCV genotype among different age groups and gender in chronic HCV patients. One thousand thirteen samples were tested for HCV genotyping using Abbott real-time HCV genotyping assay. RNA extraction from plasma was done using the m2000sp platform. The amplification and detection of genotypes was done on m2000rt instrument. The lower limit of detection assay is 500 IU/mL. The indeterminate genotypes were analyzed by sequencing of the NS5B region. We found genotype 1 in 1.68%, genotype 1b in 0.89%, genotype 1a in 0.79%, genotype 2 in 0.6, genotype 3 in 94.37%, genotype 4 in 0.4%, genotype 5 in 0.09%, and indeterminate genotype result were found in 1.18%. Abbott assay could not identify 12 samples of genotype 3 (1.18%) and gave the indeterminate result. It also fails to assign some of the samples of genotype 1 into 1a and 1b. The indeterminate genotypes were resolved by sequencing followed by phylogenetic analysis. Genotype 3 is the predominant genotype and significantly higher in females as compared with males. Genotype 1a is more common in males than in females. Indeterminate HCV genotypes on sequencing analysis identify as genotype 3a and likewise subtype of genotype1 as 1a.

Comparison of Sanger sequencing for hepatitis C virus genotyping with a commercial line probe assay in a tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

The technique most frequently used to genotype HCV is quantitative RT-PCR. This technique is unable to provide an accurate genotype/subtype for many samples; we decided to develop an in-house method with the goal of accurately identifying the genotype of all samples. As a Belgium National Centre of reference for hepatitis, we developed in-house sequencing not only for 5'UTR and core regions starting from VERSANT LiPA amplicons but also for NS5B regions. The sequencing of VERSANT LiPA amplicons might be useful for many laboratories worldwide using the VERSANT LiPA assay to overcome undetermined results.

METHODS

100 samples from Hepatitis C virus infected patients analysed by the VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 LiPA Assay covering frequent HCV types and subtypes were included in this study. NS5B, 5'UTR and Core home-made sequencing were then performed on these samples. The sequences obtained were compared with the HCV genomic BLAST bank.

RESULTS

All the samples were characterised by the VERSANT LiPA assay (8 G1a, 17 G1b, 6 G2, 11 G3, 13 G4, and 10 G6). It was not possible to discriminate between G6 and G1 by the VERSANT LiPA assay for 8 samples and 27 had an undetermined genotype. Forty-one samples were sequenced for the three regions: NS5B, 5'UTR and Core. Twenty-three samples were sequenced for two regions: 5' UTR and Core and 36 samples were sequenced only for NS5B. Of the 100 samples included, 64 samples were analysed for 5'UTR and Core sequencing and 79 samples were analysed for NS5B sequencing. The global agreement between VERSANT LiPA assay and sequencing was greater than 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we describe a new, original method to confirm HCV genotypes of samples not discriminated by a commercial assay, using amplicons already obtained by the screening method, here the VERSANT LiPA assay. This method thus saves one step if a confirmation assay is needed and might be of usefulness for many laboratories worldwide performing VERSANT LiPA assay in particular.

High prevalence of genotype 6 hepatitis C virus infection in Southern Taiwan using Abbott genotype assays

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Abbott RealTime Genotype II assay can effectively identify hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes (GTs), but some GT 6 subtypes might not be differentiated from GT 1. Abbott RealTime Genotype II PLUS and sequencing might be needed to resolve these ambiguous results. Unlike the high prevalence of GT 6 in Southeast Asia, GT 6 had rarely been reported in Taiwan except in intravenous drug abusers (IDU). But the prevalence of GT 6 in Taiwan might be underestimated. We conducted this study to determine the GTs in a HCV endemic area in Southern Taiwan.

METHODS

A total of 1147 patients with hepatitis C viremia for direct acting antivirals (DAA) treatment at the Chi Mei medical system in Tainan were enrolled. Genotype was determined using a working flow consisted of Abbott GT II, PLUS assays and 5' untranslated region (5' UTR)/core sequencing.

RESULTS

Among the 1147 patients, 883 (77.0%) obtained GT results by GT II, 264 (23.0%) samples with ambiguous results by GT II assay received further tests, including 194 (73.5%) with PLUS assay and 70 (26.5%) with 5'UTR/core sequencing. Nearly three-quarters (73.5%) of ambiguous results by GT II assay were GT 6. Overall, 18.3% of samples were GT 6. Phylogenetic study of 11 samples of GT 6 subtypes showed 7 (63.6%) were 6 g.

CONCLUSION

GT 6 is the major factor for high ambiguous rate by GT II. Unexpected high prevalence of GT 6 (18.3%) in Southern Taiwan, especially subtype 6 g, closely related to Indonesian strains, is first reported.

Reliable resolution of ambiguous hepatitis C virus genotype 1 results with the Abbott HCV Genotype Plus RUO assay

Accurate subtyping of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) remains clinically and epidemiologically relevant. The Abbott HCV Genotype Plus RUO (GT Plus) assay, targeting the core region, was evaluated as a reflex test to resolve ambiguous HCV-1 results in a challenging sample collection. 198 HCV-1 specimens were analysed with GT Plus (38 specimens with and 160 without subtype assigned by the Abbott RealTime Genotype II (GT II) assay targeting the 5'NC and NS5B regions). Sanger sequencing of the core and/or NS5B regions were performed in 127 specimens without subtype assignment by GT II, with "not detected" results by GT Plus, or with mixed genotypes/subtypes. The remaining GT Plus results were compared to LiPA 2.0 (n = 45) or just to GT II results if concordant (n = 26). GT Plus successfully assigned the subtype in 142/160 (88.8%) samples. "Not detected" results indicated other HCV-1 subtypes/genotypes or mismatches in the core region in subtype 1b. The subtyping concordance between GT Plus and either sequencing or LiPA was 98.6% (140/142). Therefore, combined use of GT II and GT Plus assays represents a reliable and simple approach which considerably reduced the number of ambiguous HCV-1 results and enabled a successful subtyping of 98.9% of all HCV-1 samples.

Indeterminate genotypes of hepatitis C virus by the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay in Morocco. About eight cases resolved by a sequencing method

The early detection and genotyping of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) are important in the management of this infection. The genotype is the major factor influencing treatment decisions. That's why it is necessary to use fast and accurate methods in its determination. This study reports, over a period of 3 years (from May 2012 to July 2015), the percentage of indeterminate genotypes by the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II test and their results using a sequencing technique. Of 309 samples of 309 patients tested, 11 were indeterminate (4.4%). There were three cases of cross-reactivity (1b/4 in one case, 2/5 in two cases) and a possible co-infection 1 + 4. Among those indeterminate genotypes, cross-reactivities and co-infections, ten samples were tested by sequencing. The results were for four of them a 1d subtype, five were a 2i subtype and one was a 2l subtype. These results support the thesis of complementarity between the two methods: genotyping for the detection of mixed reactions and sequencing for resolving indeterminate cases by genotyping.

Utility of the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype Plus RUO assay used in combination with the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis virus C (HCV) genotype (GT) determination and subtype (ST) differentiation (1a versus 1b) remain important for the selection of appropriate direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy.

OBJECTIVES

This study is a retrospective comparison of HCV GT and ST result distribution when using the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay (HCVGT II) alone and in combination with the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype Plus RUO assay (HCVGT Plus) for routine testing of clinical serum specimens at a reference laboratory.

STUDY DESIGN

HCVGT II results of specimens tested from June 2014 through January 2016 (period 1) were compared with combined results from HCVGT II and HCVGT Plus (HCVGT II/Plus) performed from January 2016 through January 2017 (period 2).

RESULTS

A total of 44,127 and 25,361 specimens were tested during periods 1 and 2, respectively. Use of HCVGT II/Plus significantly reduced the frequency of GT 1 results without ST (0.4%) when compared to preliminary HCVGT II results during period 2 (5.3%; p < 0.01) and final HCVGT II results in period 1 (5.5%; p < 0.01). HCVGT II/Plus also resulted in GT 6 reactivity in 38 specimens with results of "HCV detected" (n = 17) or GT 1 (n = 21) following initial HCVGT II testing during period 2.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared to the use of HCVGT II alone, HCVGT II/Plus significantly reduced the frequency of GT 1 without ST results observed in a large reference laboratory, while also enabling the identification of HCV GT 6.

Impact of inter-genotypic recombination and probe cross-reactivity on the performance of the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay for hepatitis C genotyping

The Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay (Abbott-RT-HCV assay) is a real-time PCR based genotyping method for hepatitis C virus (HCV). This study measured the impact of inter-genotypic recombination and probe cross-reactivity on the performance of the Abbott-RT-HCV assay. 517 samples were genotyped using the Abbott-RT-HCV assay over a one-year period, 34 (6.6%) were identified as HCV genotype 1 without further subtype designation raising the possibility of inaccurate genotyping. These samples were subjected to confirmatory sequencing. 27 of these 34 (79%) samples were genotype 1b while five (15%) were genotype 6. One HCV isolate was an inter-genotypic 1a/4o recombinant. This is a novel natural HCV recombinant that has never been reported. Inter-genotypic recombination and probe cross-reactivity can affect the accuracy of the Abbott-RT-HCV assay, both of which have significant implications on antiviral regimen choice. Confirmatory sequencing of ambiguous results is crucial for accurate genotyping.

Chronic Hepatitis B, C, and D

Chronic hepatitis B, C, and D virus infections contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality of immunocompromised individuals. To contextualize discussion of these infections in immunocompromised patients, this paper provides an overview of aspects of infection in normal hosts. It then describes differences in disease, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic management observed in immunocompromised patients.

Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime HCV genotype II plus RUO (PLUS) assay with reference to core and NS5B sequencing

BACKGROUND

HCV genotyping remains a critical tool for guiding initiation of therapy and selecting the most appropriate treatment regimen. Current commercial genotyping assays may have difficulty identifying 1a, 1b and genotype 6.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the concordance for identifying 1a, 1b, and genotype 6 between two methods: the PLUS assay and core/NS5B sequencing.

STUDY DESIGN

This study included 236 plasma and serum samples previously genotyped by core/NS5B sequencing. Of these, 25 samples were also previously tested by the Abbott RealTime HCV GT II Research Use Only (RUO) assay and yielded ambiguous results. The remaining 211 samples were routine genotype 1 (n=169) and genotype 6 (n=42). Genotypes obtained from sequence data were determined using a laboratory-developed HCV sequence analysis tool and the NCBI non-redundant database.

RESULTS

Agreement between the PLUS assay and core/NS5B sequencing for genotype 1 samples was 95.8% (162/169), with 96% (127/132) and 95% (35/37) agreement for 1a and 1b samples respectively. PLUS results agreed with core/NS5B sequencing for 83% (35/42) of unselected genotype 6 samples, with the remaining seven "not detected" by the PLUS assay. Among the 25 samples with ambiguous GT II results, 15 were concordant by PLUS and core/NS5B sequencing, nine were not detected by PLUS, and one sample had an internal control failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The PLUS assay is an automated method that identifies 1a, 1b and genotype 6 with good agreement with gold-standard core/NS5B sequencing and can aid in the resolution of certain genotype samples with ambiguous GT II results.

Development and validation of a real-time, reverse transcription PCR assay for rapid and low-cost genotyping of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1a, 1b, 2, and 3a

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects millions of people and leads to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment regimen selection requires HCV genotype (Gt) and Gt 1 subtype determination. Use of a laboratory developed, reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay was explored as a low-cost, high-throughput screening approach for the major HCV genotypes and subtypes in North America. A commercial line probe assay (LiPA) was used for comparison. Sequencing and/or an alternative PCR assay were used for discordant analyses. Testing of 155 clinical samples revealed that a paired, duplex real-time RT-PCR assay that targets Gts 1a and 3a in one reaction and Gts 1b and 2 in another had 95% overall sensitivity and individual Gt sensitivity and specificity of 98-100% and 85-98%, respectively. The RT-PCR assay detected mixed HCV Gts in clinical and spiked samples and no false-positive reactions occurred with rare Gts 3b, 4, 5, or 6. Implementation of the RT-PCR assay, with some reflex LiPA testing, would cost only a small portion of the cost of using LiPA alone, and can also save 1.5h of hands-on time. The use of a laboratory developed RT-PCR assay for HCV genotyping has the potential to reduce cost and labour burdens in high-volume testing settings.

Assessment of a Novel Automatic Real-Time PCR Assay on the Cobas 4800 Analyzer as a Screening Platform for Hepatitis C Virus Genotyping in Clinical Practice: Comparison with Massive Sequencing

The unequivocal identification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) subtypes 1a/1b and genotypes 2 to 6 is required for optimizing the effectiveness of interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral therapies. We compared the performance of a new real-time HCV genotyping assay used on the Cobas 4800 system (C4800) with that of high-resolution HCV subtyping (HRCS). In total, 502 samples were used, including 184 samples from chronic HCV patients (from routine laboratory activity during April 2016), 5 stored samples with double HCV genotype infections for testing the limitations of the method, and 313 samples from a screening protocol implemented in our hospital (from May to August 2016) based on the new method to further determine its genotyping accuracy. A total of 282 samples, including 171 from April 2016 (the 13 remaining had too low of a viral load for HRCS), 5 selected with double infections, and 106 from screening, were analyzed by both methods, and 220 were analyzed only by the C4800. The C4800 correctly subtyped 125 of 126 1a/1b samples, and the 1 remaining sample was reported as genotype 1. The C4800 correctly genotyped 38 of 45 non-1a/1b samples (classified by HRCS), and it reported the remaining 7 samples as indeterminate. One hundred two of 106 non-1a/1b genotype samples that were identified using the C4800 for screening were confirmed by HRCS. In the 4 remaining samples, 3 were correctly reported as genotype 1 (without defining the subtype) and 1 was reported as indeterminate. None of the samples were misgenotyped. Four of 7 samples with double HCV infections were correctly genotyped by the C4800. Excluding the 5 selected double-infected samples, the C4800 showed 95.7% concordant results for genotyping HCVs 2 to 6 and 1a/1b subtyping, and 99.2% concordance for subtyping 1a/1b single infections in clinical samples. To improve laboratory workflow, we propose using the C4800 as a first-line test for HCV genotyping and 1a/1b classification, followed by transferring non-1a/1b samples to a center where HRCS is available, if further characterization is needed.

Discrepant diagnostic results using two genotyping methods in a chronic hepatitis C patient in serogroup 1

We present the case of a chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patient who was originally diagnosed with genotype 2a on serogroup 1 CHC genotype testing, but who was subsequently confirmed to have genotype 1b when using the hepatitis C virus (HCV) monitor genotype assay. The genotype 2a diagnosis was attributed to the fact that the type 2a-specific primer used in Okamoto et al.'s method (HCV genotype primer kit) has relatively high homology, which caused the amplification reaction to proceed, rendering a HCV RNA genotype test result of 2a. Genotype testing is important in determining whether a patient is indicated for concomitant dual oral therapy; however, the potential for different diagnoses such as described in this report highlights the importance of serogroup confirmation.

Identification of hepatitis C virus genotype 3 by a commercial assay challenged by natural polymorphisms detected in Spain from patients with diverse origins

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping is crucial in clinical practise for determining the type and duration of antiviral therapy. Between 2009 and 2014, 24 (7.95%) of all HCV genotype 3 (HCV-3) cases obtained indeterminate results via the RealTime HCV Genotype II assay (Abbott) at a tertiary care center in Spain. HCV-3 is the second most common genotype worldwide. Moreover, it has been associated with a higher risk of liver disease progression and a lower response to the latest antivirals.

OBJECTIVE

Given the clinical significance of accurately identifying HCV-3, we aimed to characterize the genetic diversity of the HCV 5' untranslated region (5' UTR), the target of genotyping assays, by ultradeep pyrosequencing (UDPS).

STUDY DESIGN

For the 24 indeterminate samples, the 5' UTR-core was amplified and subjected to UDPS with the 454/GS-Junior platform (Roche). The genotype/subtype of each identified haplotype was assigned by phylogenetic analysis. For comparison, three additional samples correctly identified as HCV-3 by the real-time assay were also analyzed.

RESULTS

HCV genotyping based on 5' UTR-core UDPS was in agreement with NS5B Sanger sequencing in all cases, confirming the absence of mixed infections and recombination events. The generated 5' UTR sequences proved the presence of one to three polymorphisms at the probe-binding site of the Abbott assay, thereby differentiating indeterminate from correctly genotyped HCV-3 samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed naturally occurring polymorphisms provide insight into regional differences observed with genotype 3, their impact on genotyping assay performance, and potential improvement and designing options.

Characterization of Samples Identified as Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 without Subtype by Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II Assay Using the New Abbott HCV Genotype Plus RUO Test

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping continues to be relevant for therapeutic strategies. Some samples are reported as genotype 1 (gt 1) without subtype by the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II (GT II) test. To characterize such samples further, the Abbott HCV Genotype Plus RUO (Plus) assay, which targets the core region for gt 1a, gt 1b, and gt 6 detection, was evaluated as a reflex test in reference to NS5B or 5′-untranslated region (UTR)/core region sequencing. Of 3,626 routine samples, results of gt 1 without subtype were received for 171 samples (4.7%), accounting for 11.5% of gt 1 specimens. The Plus assay and sequencing were applied to 98 of those samples. NS5B or 5′-UTR/core region sequencing was successful for 91/98 specimens (92.9%). Plus assay and sequencing results were concordant for 87.9% of specimens (80/91 samples). Sequencing confirmed Plus assay results for 82.6%, 85.7%, 100%, and 89.3% of gt 1a, gt 1b, gt 6, and non-gt 1a/1b/6 results, respectively. Notably, 12 gt 6 samples that had been identified previously as gt 1 without subtype were assigned correctly here; for 25/28 samples reported as “not detected” by the Plus assay, sequencing identified the samples as gt 1 with subtypes other than 1a/1b. The genetic variability of HCV continues to present challenges for the current genotyping platforms regardless of the applied methodology. Samples identified by the GT II assay as gt 1 without subtype can be further resolved and reliably characterized by the new Plus assay.

Comparison of Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II with Versant line probe assay 2.0 for hepatitis C virus genotyping

Genotyping and subtyping of 225 samples with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1, 2, 3, or 6 infection were done with Versant LiPA 2.0 and Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype (GT) II by using direct sequencing of the NS5B and 5' untranslated regions as the reference standards. The concordance rates were >99.2% for genotypes and 96.1% for subtypes 1a and 1b. Both the Abbott RealTime and Versant LiPA assays can accurately determine hepatitis C virus genotypes. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00979979.).

High-resolution hepatitis C virus subtyping using NS5B deep sequencing and phylogeny, an alternative to current methods

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is classified into seven major genotypes and 67 subtypes. Recent studies have shown that in HCV genotype 1-infected patients, response rates to regimens containing direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are subtype dependent. Currently available genotyping methods have limited subtyping accuracy. We have evaluated the performance of a deep-sequencing-based HCV subtyping assay, developed for the 454/GS-Junior platform, in comparison with those of two commercial assays (Versant HCV genotype 2.0 and Abbott Real-time HCV Genotype II) and using direct NS5B sequencing as a gold standard (direct sequencing), in 114 clinical specimens previously tested by first-generation hybridization assay (82 genotype 1 and 32 with uninterpretable results). Phylogenetic analysis of deep-sequencing reads matched subtype 1 calling by population Sanger sequencing (69% 1b, 31% 1a) in 81 specimens and identified a mixed-subtype infection (1b/3a/1a) in one sample. Similarly, among the 32 previously indeterminate specimens, identical genotype and subtype results were obtained by direct and deep sequencing in all but four samples with dual infection. In contrast, both Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 and Abbott Real-time HCV Genotype II failed subtype 1 calling in 13 (16%) samples each and were unable to identify the HCV genotype and/or subtype in more than half of the non-genotype 1 samples. We concluded that deep sequencing is more efficient for HCV subtyping than currently available methods and allows qualitative identification of mixed infections and may be more helpful with respect to informing treatment strategies with new DAA-containing regimens across all HCV subtypes.

Molecular diagnostics in the management of chronic hepatitis C: key considerations in the era of new antiviral therapies

Molecular tests that detect and/or quantify HCV RNA are important in the diagnosis and management of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) undergoing anti-viral therapy. The primary goal of anti-HCV therapy is to achieve a sustained virologic response (SVR) defined as "undetectable" Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA in the serum or plasma at 12 to 24 weeks following the end of treatment.