Penetration of topically used antimicrobials through Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: A comparative study using different models

Rhamnolipid Micelles Assist Azithromycin in Efficiently Disrupting Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms and Impeding Their Re-Formation

Introduction

Biofilm is highly resistant to antibiotics due to its heterogeneity and is implicated in over 80% of chronic infections; these refractory and relapse-prone infections pose a huge medical burden.

Methods

In this study, rhamnolipid (RHL), a biosurfactant with antibiofilm activity, was loaded with the antibiotic azithromycin (AZI) to construct a stable nanomicelle (AZI@RHL) that promotes Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) biofilm disruption.

Results

AZI@RHL micelles made a destruction in biofilms. The biofilm biomasses were reduced significantly by 48.2% (P<0.05), and the main components polysaccharides and proteins were reduced by 47.5% and 36.8%, respectively. These decreases were about 3.1 (15.9%), 7.3 (6.5%), and 1.9 (19.5%) times higher compared with those reported for free AZI. The disruption of biofilm structure was observed under a confocal microscope with fluorescent labeling, and 48.2% of the cells in the biofilm were killed. By contrast, the clearance rates of cells were only 20% and 17% when treated alone with blank micelles or free AZI. Biofilm formation was inhibited up to 92% in the AZI@RHL group due to effects on cell auto-aggregation and eDNA release. The rates for the other groups were significantly lower, with only 27.7% for the RHL group and 12% for the AZI group (P<0.05). The low cell survival and great formation inhibition could reduce biofilm recolonization and re-formation.

Conclusion

The antibiofilm efficacy of rhamnolipid was improved through micellar nanoparticle effects when loading azithromycin. AZI@RHL provides a one-step solution that covers biofilm disruption, bacteria inactivation, recolonization avoidance, and biofilm re-formation inhibition.

Targeting the Achilles’ Heel of Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by the Endocannabinoid Anandamide

Antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a major health issue that requires new therapeutic approaches. Accumulating data suggest that it is possible to sensitize these bacteria to antibiotics by combining them with inhibitors targeting efflux pumps, the low-affinity penicillin-binding protein PBP2a, cell wall teichoic acid, or the cell division protein FtsZ. We have previously shown that the endocannabinoid Anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamine; AEA) could sensitize drug-resistant S. aureus to a variety of antibiotics, among others, through growth arrest and inhibition of drug efflux. Here, we looked at biochemical alterations caused by AEA. We observed that AEA increased the intracellular drug concentration of a fluorescent penicillin and augmented its binding to membrane proteins with concomitant altered membrane distribution of these proteins. AEA also prevented the secretion of exopolysaccharides (EPS) and reduced the cell wall teichoic acid content, both processes known to require transporter proteins. Notably, AEA was found to inhibit membrane ATPase activity that is necessary for transmembrane transport. AEA did not affect the membrane GTPase activity, and the GTPase cell division protein FtsZ formed the Z-ring of the divisome normally in the presence of AEA. Rather, AEA caused a reduction in murein hydrolase activities involved in daughter cell separation. Altogether, this study shows that AEA affects several biochemical processes that culminate in the sensitization of the drug-resistant bacteria to antibiotics.

Nanocarriers for combating biofilms: advantages and challenges

Bacterial biofilms are highly resistant to antibiotics and pose a great threat to human and animal health. The control and removal of bacterial biofilms have become an important topic in the field of bacterial infectious diseases. Nanocarriers show great anti-biofilm potential because of their small particle size and strong permeability. In this review, the advantages of nanocarriers for combating biofilms are analyzed. Nanocarriers can act on all stages of bacterial biofilm formation and diffusion. They can improve the scavenging effect of biofilm by targeting biofilm, destroying extracellular polymeric substances, and enhancing the biofilm permeability of antimicrobial substances. Nanocarriers can also improve the antibacterial ability of antimicrobial drugs against bacteria in biofilm by protecting the loaded drugs and controlling the release of antimicrobial substances. Additionally, we emphasize the challenges faced in using nanocarrier formulations and translating them from a preclinical level to the clinical setting.

Liposome as a delivery system for the treatment of biofilm-mediated infections

Biofilm formation by pathogenic microorganisms has been a tremendous challenge for antimicrobial therapies due to various factors. The biofilm matrix sequesters bacterial cells from the exterior environment and therefore prevents antimicrobial agents from reaching the interior. In addition, biofilm surface extracellular polymeric substances can absorb antimicrobial agents and thus reduce their bioavailability. To conquer these protection mechanisms, liposomes have been developed into a drug delivery system for antimicrobial agents against biofilm-mediated infections. The unique characteristics of liposomes, including versatility for cargoes, target-specificity, nonimmunogenicity, low toxicity, and biofilm matrix-/cell membrane-fusogenicity, remarkably improve the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents and minimize recurrence of infections. This review summarizes current development of liposomal carriers for biofilm therapeutics, presents evidence in their practical applications and discusses their potential limitations.

Corneal Infection Models: Tools to Investigate the Role of Biofilms in Bacterial Keratitis

Bacterial keratitis is a corneal infection which may cause visual impairment or even loss of the infected eye. It remains a major cause of blindness in the developing world. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are common causative agents and these bacterial species are known to colonise the corneal surface as biofilm populations. Biofilms are complex bacterial communities encased in an extracellular polymeric matrix and are notoriously difficult to eradicate once established. Biofilm bacteria exhibit different phenotypic characteristics from their planktonic counterparts, including an increased resistance to antibiotics and the host immune response. Therefore, understanding the role of biofilms will be essential in the development of new ophthalmic antimicrobials. A brief overview of biofilm-specific resistance mechanisms is provided, but this is a highly multifactorial and rapidly expanding field that warrants further research. Progression in this field is dependent on the development of suitable biofilm models that acknowledge the complexity of the ocular environment. Abiotic models of biofilm formation (where biofilms are studied on non-living surfaces) currently dominate the literature, but co-culture infection models are beginning to emerge. In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo corneal infection models have now been reported which use a variety of different experimental techniques and animal models. In this review, we will discuss existing corneal infection models and their application in the study of biofilms and host-pathogen interactions at the corneal surface.

Lipid-Based Antimicrobial Delivery-Systems for the Treatment of Bacterial Infections

Many nanotechnology-based antimicrobials and antimicrobial-delivery-systems have been developed over the past decades with the aim to provide alternatives to antibiotic treatment of infectious-biofilms across the human body. Antimicrobials can be loaded into nanocarriers to protect them against de-activation, and to reduce their toxicity and potential, harmful side-effects. Moreover, antimicrobial nanocarriers such as micelles, can be equipped with stealth and pH-responsive features that allow self-targeting and accumulation in infectious-biofilms at high concentrations. Micellar and liposomal nanocarriers differ in hydrophilicity of their outer-surface and inner-core. Micelles are self-assembled, spherical core-shell structures composed of single layers of surfactants, with hydrophilic head-groups and hydrophobic tail-groups pointing to the micellar core. Liposomes are composed of lipids, self-assembled into bilayers. The hydrophilic head of the lipids determines the surface properties of liposomes, while the hydrophobic tail, internal to the bilayer, determines the fluidity of liposomal-membranes. Therefore, whereas micelles can only be loaded with hydrophobic antimicrobials, hydrophilic antimicrobials can be encapsulated in the hydrophilic, aqueous core of liposomes and hydrophobic or amphiphilic antimicrobials can be inserted in the phospholipid bilayer. Nanotechnology-derived liposomes can be prepared with diameters <100-200 nm, required to prevent reticulo-endothelial rejection and allow penetration into infectious-biofilms. However, surface-functionalization of liposomes is considerably more difficult than of micelles, which explains while self-targeting, pH-responsive liposomes that find their way through the blood circulation toward infectious-biofilms are still challenging to prepare. Equally, development of liposomes that penetrate over the entire thickness of biofilms to provide deep killing of biofilm inhabitants still provides a challenge. The liposomal phospholipid bilayer easily fuses with bacterial cell membranes to release high antimicrobial-doses directly inside bacteria. Arguably, protection against de-activation of antibiotics in liposomal nanocarriers and their fusogenicity constitute the biggest advantage of liposomal antimicrobial carriers over antimicrobials free in solution. Many Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains, resistant to specific antibiotics, have been demonstrated to be susceptible to these antibiotics when encapsulated in liposomal nanocarriers. Recently, also progress has been made concerning large-scale production and long-term storage of liposomes. Therewith, the remaining challenges to develop self-targeting liposomes that penetrate, accumulate and kill deeply in infectious-biofilms remain worthwhile to pursue.

Enzyme responsive copolymer micelles enhance the anti-biofilm efficacy of the antiseptic chlorhexidine

Staphylococcal biofilms cause many infectious diseases and are highly tolerant to the effects of antimicrobials; this is partly due to the biofilm matrix, which acts as a physical barrier retarding the penetration and reducing susceptibility to antimicrobials, thereby decreasing successful treatment outcomes. In this study, both single and mixed micellar systems based on poly vinyl caprolactam (PCL)-polyethylene glycol (PEG) copolymers were optimised for delivery of chlorhexidine (CHX) to S. aureus, MRSA and S. epidermidis biofilms and evaluated for their toxicity using Caenorhabditis elegans. The respective polyethylene glycol (PEG) and poly vinyl caprolactam (PCL) structural components promoted stealth properties and enzymatic responsive release of CHX inside biofilms, leading to significantly enhanced penetration (56%) compared with free CHX and improving the efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms grown on an artificial dermis (2.4 log reduction of CFU). Mixing Soluplus-based micelles with Solutol further enhanced the CHX penetration (71%) and promoted maximum reduction in biofilm biomass (>60%). Nematodes-based toxicity assay showed micelles with no lethal effects as indicated by their high survival rate (100%) after 72 h exposure. This study thus demonstrated that bio-responsive carriers can be designed to deliver a poorly water-soluble antimicrobial agent and advance the control of biofilm associated infections.

Rifampicin-Loaded Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Intracellular Infections

Infectious diseases remain a major burden in today’s world, causing high mortality rates and significant economic losses, with >9 million deaths per year predicted by 2030. Invasion of host cells by intracellular bacteria poses treatment challenges due to the poor permeation of antimicrobials into the infected cells. To overcome these limitations, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNP) loaded with the antibiotic rifampicin were investigated as a nanocarrier system for the treatment of intracellular bacterial infection with specific interest in the influence of particle size on treatment efficiency. An intracellular infection model was established using small colony variants (SCV) of S. aureus in macrophages to systemically evaluate the efficacy of rifampicin-loaded MSNP against the pathogen as compared to a rifampicin solution. As hypothesized, the superior uptake of MSNP by macrophages resulted in an enhanced treatment efficacy of the encapsulated rifampicin as compared to free antibiotic. This study provides a potential platform to improve the performance of currently available antibiotics against intracellular infections.

Lipid-Based Antimicrobial Delivery-Systems for the Treatment of Bacterial Infections

Many nanotechnology-based antimicrobials and antimicrobial-delivery-systems have been developed over the past decades with the aim to provide alternatives to antibiotic treatment of infectious-biofilms across the human body. Antimicrobials can be loaded into nanocarriers to protect them against de-activation, and to reduce their toxicity and potential, harmful side-effects. Moreover, antimicrobial nanocarriers such as micelles, can be equipped with stealth and pH-responsive features that allow self-targeting and accumulation in infectious-biofilms at high concentrations. Micellar and liposomal nanocarriers differ in hydrophilicity of their outer-surface and inner-core. Micelles are self-assembled, spherical core-shell structures composed of single layers of surfactants, with hydrophilic head-groups and hydrophobic tail-groups pointing to the micellar core. Liposomes are composed of lipids, self-assembled into bilayers. The hydrophilic head of the lipids determines the surface properties of liposomes, while the hydrophobic tail, internal to the bilayer, determines the fluidity of liposomal-membranes. Therefore, whereas micelles can only be loaded with hydrophobic antimicrobials, hydrophilic antimicrobials can be encapsulated in the hydrophilic, aqueous core of liposomes and hydrophobic or amphiphilic antimicrobials can be inserted in the phospholipid bilayer. Nanotechnology-derived liposomes can be prepared with diameters <100-200 nm, required to prevent reticulo-endothelial rejection and allow penetration into infectious-biofilms. However, surface-functionalization of liposomes is considerably more difficult than of micelles, which explains while self-targeting, pH-responsive liposomes that find their way through the blood circulation toward infectious-biofilms are still challenging to prepare. Equally, development of liposomes that penetrate over the entire thickness of biofilms to provide deep killing of biofilm inhabitants still provides a challenge. The liposomal phospholipid bilayer easily fuses with bacterial cell membranes to release high antimicrobial-doses directly inside bacteria. Arguably, protection against de-activation of antibiotics in liposomal nanocarriers and their fusogenicity constitute the biggest advantage of liposomal antimicrobial carriers over antimicrobials free in solution. Many Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains, resistant to specific antibiotics, have been demonstrated to be susceptible to these antibiotics when encapsulated in liposomal nanocarriers. Recently, also progress has been made concerning large-scale production and long-term storage of liposomes. Therewith, the remaining challenges to develop self-targeting liposomes that penetrate, accumulate and kill deeply in infectious-biofilms remain worthwhile to pursue.