Cost-effectiveness of AI for Caries Detection: Randomized Trial

Transfer Learning-Based Classifier to Automate the Extraction of False X-Ray Images From Hospital's Database

BACKGROUND

During preclinical training, dental students take radiographs of acrylic (plastic) blocks containing extracted patient teeth. With the digitisation of medical records, a central archiving system was created to store and retrieve all x-ray images, regardless of whether they were images of teeth on acrylic blocks, or those from patients. In the early stage of the digitisation process, and due to the immaturity of the data management system, numerous images were mixed up and stored in random locations within a unified archiving system, including patient record files. Filtering out and expunging the undesired training images is imperative as manual searching for such images is problematic. Hence the aim of this stidy was to differentiate intraoral images from artificial images on acrylic blocks.

METHODS

An artificial intelligence (AI) solution to automatically differentiate between intraoral radiographs taken of patients and those taken of acrylic blocks was utilised in this study. The concept of transfer learning was applied to a dataset provided by a Dental Hospital.

RESULTS

An accuracy score, F1 score, and a recall score of 98.8%, 99.2%, and 100%, respectively, were achieved using a VGG16 pre-trained model. These results were more sensitive compared to those obtained initally using a baseline model with 96.5%, 97.5%, and 98.9% accuracy score, F1 score, and a recall score respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed system using transfer learning was able to accurately identify "fake" radiographs images and distinguish them from the real intraoral images.

Revolutionizing CAD/CAM-based restorative dental processes and materials with artificial intelligence: a concise narrative review

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly prevalent in biomedical and industrial development, capturing the interest of dental professionals and patients. Its potential to improve the accuracy and speed of dental procedures is set to revolutionize dental care. The use of AI in computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) within the restorative dental and material science fields offers numerous benefits, providing a new dimension to these practices. This study aims to provide a concise overview of the implementation of AI-powered technologies in CAD/CAM restorative dental procedures and materials. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using keywords from 2000 to 2023 to obtain pertinent information. This method was implemented to guarantee a thorough investigation of the subject matter. Keywords included; "Artificial Intelligence", "Machine Learning", "Neural Networks", "Virtual Reality", "Digital Dentistry", "CAD/CAM", and "Restorative Dentistry". Artificial intelligence in digital restorative dentistry has proven to be highly beneficial in various dental CAD/CAM applications. It helps in automating and incorporating esthetic factors, occlusal schemes, and previous practitioners' CAD choices in fabricating dental restorations. AI can also predict the debonding risk of CAD/CAM restorations and the compositional effects on the mechanical properties of its materials. Continuous enhancements are being made to overcome its limitations and open new possibilities for future developments in this field.

Multi-model deep learning approach for segmentation of teeth and periapical lesions on pantomographs

INTRODUCTION

The fields of medicine and dentistry are beginning to integrate artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnostics. This may reduce subjectivity and improve the accuracy of diagnoses and treatment planning. Current evidence on pathosis detection on pantomographs (PGs) indicates the presence or absence of disease in the entire radiographic image, with little evidence of the relation of periapical pathosis to the causative tooth.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a deep learning (DL) AI model for the segmentation of periapical pathosis and its relation to teeth on PGs.

METHOD

250 PGs were manually annotated by subject experts to lay down the ground truth for training AI algorithms on the segmentation of periapical pathosis. Two approaches were used for lesion detection: Multi-models 1 and 2, using U-net and Mask RCNN algorithms, respectively. The resulting segmented lesions generated on the testing data set were superimposed with results of teeth segmentation and numbering algorithms trained separately to relate lesions to causative teeth. Hence, both multi-model approaches related periapical pathosis to the causative teeth on PGs.

RESULTS

The performance metrics of lesion segmentation carried out by U-net are as follows: Accuracy = 98.1%, precision = 84.5%, re-call = 80.3%, F-1 score = 82.2%, dice index = 75.2%, and Intersection over Union = 67.6%. Mask RCNN carried out lesion segmentation with an accuracy of 46.7%, precision of 80.6%, recall of 55%, and F-1 score of 63.1%.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the multi-model approach successfully related periapical pathosis to the causative tooth on PGs. However, U-net outperformed Mask RCNN in the tasks performed, suggesting that U-net will remain the standard for medical image segmentation tasks. Further training of the models on other findings and an increased number of images will lead to the automation of the detection of common radiographic findings in the dental diagnostic workflow.

Exploring the Methodological Approaches of Studies on Radiographic Databases Used in Cariology to Feed Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

A growing number of studies on diagnostic imaging show superior efficiency and accuracy of computer-aided diagnostic systems compared to those of certified dentists. This methodological systematic review aimed to evaluate the different methodological approaches used by studies focusing on machine learning and deep learning that have used radiographic databases to classify, detect, and segment dental caries.

METHODS

The protocol was registered in PROSPERO before data collection (CRD42022348097). Literature research was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science until December 2022, without language restrictions. Studies and surveys using a dental radiographic database for the classification, detection, or segmentation of carious lesions were sought. Records deemed eligible were retrieved and further assessed for inclusion by two reviewers who resolved any discrepancies through consensus. A third reviewer was consulted when any disagreements or discrepancies persisted between the two reviewers. After data extraction, the same reviewers assessed the methodological quality using the CLAIM and QUADAS-AI checklists.

RESULTS

After screening 325 articles, 35 studies were eligible and included. The bitewing was the most commonly used radiograph (n = 17) at the time when detection (n = 15) was the most explored computer vision task. The sample sizes used ranged from 95 to 38,437, while the augmented training set ranged from 300 to 315,786. Convolutional neural network was the most commonly used model. The mean completeness of CLAIM items was 49% (SD ± 34%). The applicability of the CLAIM checklist items revealed several weaknesses in the methodology of the selected studies: most of the studies were monocentric, and only 9% of them used an external test set when evaluating the model's performance. The QUADAS-AI tool revealed that only 43% of the studies included in this systematic review were at low risk of bias concerning the standard reference domain.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrates that the overall scientific quality of studies conducted to feed artificial intelligence algorithms is low. Some improvement in the design and validation of studies can be made with the development of a standardized guideline for the reproducibility and generalizability of results and, thus, their clinical applications.

Detection, Diagnosis, and Monitoring of Early Caries: The Future of Individualized Dental Care

Dental caries remains a significant global health issue. It was highlighted by the World Health Organization's 2022 reports that despite the efforts and scientific advancements in caries detection and management, the situation has only marginally improved over the past three decades. The persistence of this problem may be linked to outdated concepts developed almost a century ago but are still guiding dentists' approach to caries management today. There is a need to reconsider professional strategies for preventing and managing the disease. Contemporary dentistry could benefit from embracing new concepts and technologies for caries detection and management. Dentists should explore, among others, alternative methods for caries detection such as optical-based caries detection. These tools have been established for over a decade and they align with current disease understanding and international recommendations, emphasizing early detection and minimally invasive management. This narrative review presents the current state of knowledge and recent trends in caries detection, diagnosis, monitoring, and management, offering insights into future perspectives for clinical applications and research topics.

Contemporary Role and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies play a significant role and significantly impact various sectors, including healthcare, engineering, sciences, and smart cities. AI has the potential to improve the quality of patient care and treatment outcomes while minimizing the risk of human error. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming the dental industry, just like it is revolutionizing other sectors. It is used in dentistry to diagnose dental diseases and provide treatment recommendations. Dental professionals are increasingly relying on AI technology to assist in diagnosis, clinical decision-making, treatment planning, and prognosis prediction across ten dental specialties. One of the most significant advantages of AI in dentistry is its ability to analyze vast amounts of data quickly and accurately, providing dental professionals with valuable insights to enhance their decision-making processes. The purpose of this paper is to identify the advancement of artificial intelligence algorithms that have been frequently used in dentistry and assess how well they perform in terms of diagnosis, clinical decision-making, treatment, and prognosis prediction in ten dental specialties; dental public health, endodontics, oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine and pathology, oral & maxillofacial radiology, orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, pediatric dentistry, periodontics, prosthodontics, and digital dentistry in general. We will also show the pros and cons of using AI in all dental specialties in different ways. Finally, we will present the limitations of using AI in dentistry, which made it incapable of replacing dental personnel, and dentists, who should consider AI a complimentary benefit and not a threat.

Economic evaluations of artificial intelligence-based healthcare interventions: a systematic literature review of best practices in their conduct and reporting

Objectives: Health economic evaluations (HEEs) help healthcare decision makers understand the value of new technologies. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in healthcare interventions. We sought to review the conduct and reporting of published HEEs for AI-based health interventions. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review with a 15-month search window (April 2021 to June 2022) on 17th June 2022 to identify HEEs of AI health interventions and update a previous review. Records were identified from 3 databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central). Two reviewers screened papers against predefined study selection criteria. Data were extracted from included studies using prespecified data extraction tables. Included studies were quality assessed using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) checklist. Results were synthesized narratively. Results: A total of 21 studies were included. The most common type of AI intervention was automated image analysis (9/21, 43%) mainly used for screening or diagnosis in general medicine and oncology. Nearly all were cost-utility (10/21, 48%) or cost-effectiveness analyses (8/21, 38%) that took a healthcare system or payer perspective. Decision-analytic models were used in 16/21 (76%) studies, mostly Markov models and decision trees. Three (3/16, 19%) used a short-term decision tree followed by a longer-term Markov component. Thirteen studies (13/21, 62%) reported the AI intervention to be cost effective or dominant. Limitations tended to result from the input data, authorship conflicts of interest, and a lack of transparent reporting, especially regarding the AI nature of the intervention. Conclusion: Published HEEs of AI-based health interventions are rapidly increasing in number. Despite the potentially innovative nature of AI, most have used traditional methods like Markov models or decision trees. Most attempted to assess the impact on quality of life to present the cost per QALY gained. However, studies have not been comprehensively reported. Specific reporting standards for the economic evaluation of AI interventions would help improve transparency and promote their usefulness for decision making. This is fundamental for reimbursement decisions, which in turn will generate the necessary data to develop flexible models better suited to capturing the potentially dynamic nature of AI interventions.

The Impetus of Artificial Intelligence on Periodontal Diagnosis: A Brief Synopsis

The current advances in digitized data additions, machine learning and computing framework, lead to the swiftly emerging concept of "Artificial Intelligence" (AI), that are developing into areas that were formerly contemplated for human expertise. AI is a relatively rapid paced mechanics wherein the computer technology is tuned to perform human tasks. An auxiliary domain of AI is machine learning (ML), and Deep learning, a subclass of ML technique comprehends multi-layer mathematical operations. AI-based applications have tremendous potential to improve and systematize patient care thereby alleviating dentists from laborious regular tasks, and facilitate personalized, predictive and preventive dentistry. In the dental clinic, AI can execute a variety of easy tasks with greater accuracy, minimal manpower, and with fewer mistakes over human equivalents. These tasks range from appointment scheduling and coordination to helping with clinical evaluation and therapy. Besides, this could assist in the early diagnosis of dental and maxillofacial abnormalities like periodontal ailments, root caries, bony lesions, and facial malformations in addition to automatically identifying and classifying dental restorations on digital radiographs. This brusque narrative review describes the AI-based systems, their respective applications in periodontal diagnosis, the multifarious studies, possible limitations and the predictable future of AI-based dental diagnostics and treatment planning.

Deep Learning for Detection of Periapical Radiolucent Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the overall accuracy of deep learning models in detecting periapical (PA) radiolucent lesions in dental radiographs, when compared to expert clinicians.

METHODS

Electronic databases of Medline (via PubMed), Embase (via Ovid), Scopus, Google Scholar, and arXiv were searched. Quality of eligible studies was assessed by using Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Tool-2. Quantitative analyses were conducted using hierarchical logistic regression for meta-analyses on diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analyses on different image modalities (PA radiographs, panoramic radiographs, and cone beam computed tomographic images) and on different deep learning tasks (classification, segmentation, object detection) were conducted. Certainty of evidence was assessed by using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.

RESULTS

A total of 932 studies were screened. Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review, out of which 6 studies were selected for quantitative analyses. Six studies had low risk of bias. Twelve studies had risk of bias. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of included studies (all image modalities; all tasks) were 0.925 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.862-0.960), 0.852 (95% CI, 0.810-0.885), 6.261 (95% CI, 4.717-8.311), 0.087 (95% CI, 0.045-0.168), and 71.692 (95% CI, 29.957-171.565), respectively. No publication bias was detected (Egger's test, P = .82). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluationshowed a "high" certainty of evidence for the studies included in the meta-analyses.

CONCLUSION

Compared to expert clinicians, deep learning showed highly accurate results in detecting PA radiolucent lesions in dental radiographs. Most studies had risk of bias. There was a lack of prospective studies.

Artificial Intelligence for Caries Detection: Value of Data and Information

If increasing practitioners’ diagnostic accuracy, medical artificial intelligence (AI) may lead to better treatment decisions at lower costs, while uncertainty remains around the resulting cost-effectiveness. In the present study, we assessed how enlarging the data set used for training an AI for caries detection on bitewings affects cost-effectiveness and also determined the value of information by reducing the uncertainty around other input parameters (namely, the costs of AI and the population’s caries risk profile). We employed a convolutional neural network and trained it on 10%, 25%, 50%, or 100% of a labeled data set containing 29,011 teeth without and 19,760 teeth with caries lesions stemming from bitewing radiographs. We employed an established health economic modeling and analytical framework to quantify cost-effectiveness and value of information. We adopted a mixed public–private payer perspective in German health care; the health outcome was tooth retention years. A Markov model, allowing to follow posterior teeth over the lifetime of an initially 12-y-old individual, and Monte Carlo microsimulations were employed. With an increasing amount of data used to train the AI sensitivity and specificity increased nonlinearly, increasing the data set from 10% to 25% had the largest impact on accuracy and, consequently, cost-effectiveness. In the base-case scenario, AI was more effective (tooth retention for a mean [2.5%–97.5%] 62.8 [59.2–65.5] y) and less costly (378 [284–499] euros) than dentists without AI (60.4 [55.8–64.4] y; 419 [270–593] euros), with considerable uncertainty. The economic value of reducing the uncertainty around AI’s accuracy or costs was limited, while information on the population’s risk profile was more relevant. When developing dental AI, informed choices about the data set size may be recommended, and research toward individualized application of AI for caries detection seems warranted to optimize cost-effectiveness.

Characteristics, Impact, and Visibility of Scientific Publications on Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Scientometric Analysis

AIM

To analyze the bibliometric characteristics, impact, and visibility of scientific publications on artificial intelligence (AI) in dentistry in Scopus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Descriptive and cross-sectional bibliometric study, based on the systematic search of information in Scopus between 2017 and July 10, 2022. The search strategy was elaborated with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Boolean operators. The analysis of bibliometric indicators was performed with Elsevier's SciVal program.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2022, the number of publications in indexed scientific journals increased, especially in the Q1 (56.1%) and Q2 (30.6%) quartile. Among the journals with the highest production, the majority was from the United States and the United Kingdom, and the Journal of Dental Research has the highest impact (14.9 citations per publication) and the most publications (31). In addition, the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (FWCI: 8.24) and Krois Joachim (FWCI: 10.09) from Germany were the institution and author with the highest expected performance relative to the world average, respectively. The United States is the country with the highest number of published papers.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

There is an increasing tendency to increase the scientific production on artificial intelligence in the field of dentistry, with a preference for publication in prestigious scientific journals of high impact. Most of the productive authors and institutions were from Japan. There is a need to promote and consolidate strategies to develop collaborative research both nationally and internationally.