Precise tooth design using deep learning-based templates

OBJECTIVES

In prosthodontic procedures, traditional computer-aided design (CAD) is often time-consuming and lacks accuracy in shape restoration. In this study, we combined implicit template and deep learning (DL) to construct a precise neural network for personalized tooth defect restoration.

METHODS

Ninety models of right maxillary central incisor (80 for training, 10 for validation) were collected. A DL model named ToothDIT was trained to establish an implicit template and a neural network capable of predicting unique identifications. In the validation stage, teeth in validation set were processed into corner, incisive, and medium defects. The defective teeth were inputted into ToothDIT to predict the unique identification, which actuated the deformation of the implicit template to generate the highly customized template (DIT) for the target tooth. Morphological restorations were executed with templates from template shape library (TSL), average tooth template (ATT), and DIT in Exocad (GmbH, Germany). RMSestimate, width, length, aspect ratio, incisal edge curvature, incisive end retraction, and guiding inclination were introduced to assess the restorative accuracy. Statistical analysis was conducted using two-way ANOVA and paired t-test for overall and detailed differences.

RESULTS

DIT displayed significantly smaller RMSestimate than TSL and ATT. In 2D detailed analysis, DIT exhibited significantly less deviations from the natural teeth compared to TSL and ATT.

CONCLUSION

The proposed DL model successfully reconstructed the morphology of anterior teeth with various degrees of defects and achieved satisfactory accuracy. This approach provides a more reliable reference for prostheses design, resulting in enhanced accuracy in morphological restoration.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This DL model holds promise in assisting dentists and technicians in obtaining morphology templates that closely resemble the original shape of the defective teeth. These customized templates serve as a foundation for enhancing the efficiency and precision of digital restorative design for defective teeth.

Accuracy of the intaglio surface of 3D-printed hybrid resin-ceramic crowns, veneers and table-tops: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVES

The present study aims to examine the influence of the build angle on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed crowns, table-tops and veneers with a hybrid resin-ceramic material.

METHODS

One crown, on table-top and one veneer were printed in five different build angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°) (n = 50) with the digital light processing (DLP) system (Varseo XS, Bego) using hybrid resin (Varseo Smile Crownplus A3, Bego). All printed restorations were scanned using the laboratory scanner (D2000, 3Shape) and matched onto the initial reference design in metrology software (Geomagic Control X, 3D Systems). The root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated between the scanned and reference data. The data was statistically analyzed using the Tukey multiple comparison test and Wilcoxon multiple comparison test.

RESULTS

The crown group showed higher trueness at 30° (0.021 ± 0.002) and 45° (0.020 ± 0.002), and table-tops at 0° (0.015 ± 0.001) and 30° (0.014 ± 0.001) (p < 0.0001). Veneers demonstrated higher trueness at 30° (0.016 ± 0.002) (p < 0.0001). All three restoration types demonstrated the lowest trueness at a 90° build angle and portrayed deviations along the z axis. The veneer and table-top groups showed the lowest precision at 90° (veneers: 0.021 ± 0.008; table-tops: 0.013 ± 0.003). The crown group portrayed the lowest precision at 45° (0.017 ± 0.005) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The build angle of DLP-printed hybrid resin-ceramic restorations influences their accuracy.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Considering the build angle is important to achieve a better accuracy of 3D-printed resin-ceramic hybrid restorations. This may help predict or avoid the interference points between a restoration and a die and minimize the clinical adjustments.

Trueness and precision of an intraoral scanner on abutments with subgingival vertical margins: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of an intraoral scanner (IOS - Medit i700) on tooth abutments with vertical preparations at 2 depths below the free gingival margin, and to determine if the IOS can reproduce the area beyond the finish surface of the tested preparation geometry.

METHODS

Two abutments for a maxillary first molar were designed by means of CAD software, with vertical preparations set at 1 and 2 mm below the gingiva. These abutments were subsequently printed in resin and placed on a reference model. The reference files consisted of scans made using a metrological machine on these abutments. Ten scans were made with the tested IOS on each sample, resulting in two study groups. The scans from the experimental groups were labeled "V-1″ for vertical preparation at 1 mm below the gingival margin and "V-2″ for 2 mm below. The analysis of these scans was performed using Geomagic Control X (3D SYSTEMS) to assess their trueness and precision in µm. Descriptive statistics with a 95 % confidence interval were employed, alongside independent sample tests, to ascertain any differences between the groups (α=0.05).

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were not found both for trueness (p=.104) and precision (p=.409), between the tested geometries. The mean values for trueness were V-1 = 37.5[31.4-43.6]; V-2 = 32.6[30.6-34.6]. About the precision, the mean values were V-1 = 20.5[8.4-32.5]; V-2 = 18.4[8.2-28.5]. In both the study groups, it was possible to detect the surface beyond the finish area.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, vertical preparation design allows for registration of the tooth anatomy beyond the finish area with IOS. Moreover, the mean accuracy values were clinically acceptable at both 1 and 2 mm below the gingival margin.

A systematic review of factors impacting intraoral scanning accuracy in implant dentistry with emphasis on scan bodies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to explore and identify the factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning in implant dentistry, with a specific focus on scan bodies (ISBs).

METHODS

Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this study conducted a thorough electronic search across MedLine, PubMed, and Scopus to identify relevant studies. Articles were screened based on titles, abstracts, and full texts for relevance. The Robins I tool assessed the risk of bias in various study types. Data extraction occurred based on predetermined parameters for studying specimens and assessing outcomes.

RESULTS

16 studies met the specified criteria and were consequently included in the systematic review. Due to variations in variables and methods across the selected studies, statistical comparison of results was not feasible. Therefore, a descriptive review approach was chosen, acknowledging the substantial heterogeneity in the reviewed literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The precision of virtual scan results is contingent upon diverse characteristics of ISBs and implants. These factors encompass their placement within the dental arch, structural design, shape, material composition, color, and the manufacturing system, all of which contribute to scan accuracy. Additionally, considerations such as the intraoral scanner (IOS) type, scanning technique, use of scan aids, inter-implant distance, scan span, and the number of implants warrant evaluation. In the context of capturing implant positions, intraoral scanning with ISBs demonstrates comparable accuracy to traditional impression methods, particularly in single and short-span scenarios. However, the existing data lacks sufficient information on in vivo applications to formulate clinical recommendations.

Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of milled and 3D-printed CAD/CAM hybrid dental crown materials with various occlusal thicknesses

PURPOSE

To evaluate the marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of three computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing hybrid dental materials with different occlusal thicknesses.

METHODS

Ninety single-molar crowns were digitally fabricated using a milled hybrid nanoceramic (Cerasmart, CE), polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN, Vita Enamic, VE), and 3D-printed materials (Varseosmile, VS) with occlusal thicknesses of 0.8, 1, and 1.5 mm (10 specimens/group). Anatomical 3D-printed resin dies (Rigid 10K) were used as supporting materials. A CEREC MCX milling unit and a DLP-based 3D printer, Freeform Pro 2, were utilized to produce the crown samples. Before cementation, the marginal adaptation, absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD), and marginal gap (MG) were assessed using micro-CT scanning. After cementation with self-adhesive resin cement, fracture resistance was evaluated using a universal testing machine. The number of fractured crowns and the maximum fracture values (N) were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed using both one- and two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test.

RESULTS

For all occlusal thicknesses, the VS crowns demonstrated the lowest AMD and MG distances, significantly different from those of the other two milling groups (P < 0.05), whereas CE and VE did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). All VS crowns were fractured using the lowest loading forces (1480.3±226.1 to 1747.2±108.7 N). No CE and 1 and 1.5 mm VE crowns fractured under a 2000 N maximum load.

CONCLUSIONS

All hybrid-material crowns demonstrated favorable marginal adaptation within a clinically acceptable range, with 3D printing yielding superior results to milling. All materials could withstand normal occlusal force even with a 0.8 mm occlusal thickness.

Does the choice of the measuring technique affect the comparison of fit between zirconia and cobalt-chromium prostheses?

AIMS

The objectives of the study were to compare the adaptation of presintered zirconia and cobalt- chromium prostheses using microcomputed tomography (μCT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and stereomicroscope (SM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) were fabricated on metal abutments, duplicated from maxillary first premolar and first molar prepared on a typodont model. Teeth were reduced to obtain chamfer of 1.2 mm and reduction occlusaly of 2 mm occlusal. Scanning of the abutments was done with random assignment to two groups receiving the FDPs made from soft-milled Co-Cr (n = 12) and zirconia (n = 12). Marginal and internal gaps were assessed using three evaluation techniques (X-ray microcomputer tomography, SEM, and stereomicroscopy).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Comparison of the results was made using Levene and analysis of variance tests (α =0.05).

RESULTS

Irrespective of the material tested, statistical differences were found between the measuring techniques (P = 0.001 overall); the obtained mean gaps were for CT scan (92.60 ± 13.31), for SEM (101.92 ± 23.03), and for SM (113.44 ± 14.68): the multiple comparisons between techniques found a significant difference between CT and SM (P < 0.001), and SEM and SM (P = 0.025). When materials were compared within each measuring technique, Co-Cr showed lower values compared to zirconia in SEM (P < 0.001) and Stereo (P = 0.049); similar results were found in CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Results values differed with the chosen measuring technique. Co-Cr prostheses had a better fit than zirconia prostheses in SEM and Stereo. µCT showed comparable results to SEM, smaller than SM results.

Influence of glazing and aging on the marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of 3-unit monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated using additive and subtractive techniques

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Studies are sparse on how glazing and aging influence the fit of additively fabricated monolithic zirconia restorations.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of glazing and aging on the fit of 3-unit monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated using different techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 32 monolithic zirconia restorations were fabricated for a typodont model by using 4 distinct techniques (subtractive fabrication [SF], stereolithography [SLA], digital light processing [DLP], and lithography-based ceramic manufacturing [LCM]). The silicone replica approach was adopted to measure the discrepancy values for premolar and molar abutments after sintering, glazing, and 1 year of aging. The silicone replicas were sliced into mesiodistal and buccopalatal cross-sections, and digital micrographs of the cross-sections were made with a ×80 stereomicroscope. An inherent measuring program was run to record the discrepancy values (µm). Repeated-measures 2-way ANOVAs with the Bonferroni post hoc test were used to statistically analyze the acquired data. (α=.05).

RESULTS

From the repeated measures 2-way ANOVAs, both the glazing×fabrication technique and the aging×fabrication technique interactions were not statistically significant (P>.05). Glazing significantly influenced premolar abutment marginal (P=.022) and occlusal (P=.007) discrepancy values, as well as molar abutment marginal discrepancy values (P=.047). Aging had a statistically significant effect on premolar abutment marginal (P=.008) and occlusal (P=.011) discrepancy values, as well as molar abutment occlusal discrepancy values (P=.039). In both the glazing and aging data, for all areas of interest, statistically significant differences were detected among the fabrication techniques (P<.05). The LCM group had the lowest discrepancy values, followed by the SLA, SF, and DLP groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The LCM and SLA groups outperformed the other groups in terms of fit accuracy. The glazing and aging procedures altered the discrepancy values. The marginal discrepancy values of all groups were below the threshold of clinical acceptability (<120 µm).

Comparison of loupes versus microscope-enhanced CAD-CAM crown preparations: A microcomputed tomography analysis of marginal gaps

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Long-term restoration success depends on a precision marginal fit to prevent marginal leakage and caries. The successful fit of a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufactured (CAD-CAM) crown may be affected by different workflow variables, including preparation, scanning, crown design, milling, sintering, and cementation. Discrepancies in any of these steps may result in poor marginal and internal fit. Evidence suggests that tooth preparation may be the most important step in the workflow for a successful outcome. Compared with the traditional means of crown preparation using the naked eye or loupes, the dental operating microscope provides higher magnification and more direct illumination. However, the impact of high magnification during preparation on the marginal quality of CAD-CAM crowns is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare marginal fits of CAD-CAM crowns fabricated after initial preparation with loupes and subsequent preparation refinement with either loupes or a microscope. The null hypothesis was that no significant difference would be found in the marginal gap between the preparations with loupes and those with a microscope.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Mounted extracted molars (N=18) received initial crown preparations with a coarse grit, rounded shoulder, diamond rotary instrument with loupes of ×3.0 magnification. The teeth were then randomly divided into 2 groups and refined for an additional 2 minutes with fine grit, rounded shoulder, diamond rotary instruments with either loupes (LOUP) or a microscope up to ×10.0 magnification (DOM). The prepared teeth were scanned with an intraoral scanner to fabricate zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns manufactured with a 4-axis milling machine, sintered in a dental furnace in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, and cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. All teeth with crowns were mounted and scanned with a microcomputed tomography (μCT) system at 21-μm nominal voxel size. The resulting Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images were imported into a semiautomatic segmentation software program. Marginal and absolute gaps were measured at 24 consistent circumferential points per specimen. Absolute gaps were labeled, and the total volume was calculated. Paired and unpaired t tests were used for statistical analysis (α=.05).

RESULTS

The mean marginal gap was 145.0 ±259.6 μm for LOUP and 35.6 ±110.6 μm for DOM, with a statistically significant difference (P<.001). The mean gap volume for LOUP was 0.975 ±0.811 mm3, and 0.250 ±0.477 mm3 for DOM, also statistically significantly different (P=.023). A significant difference was found between the absolute and marginal gaps for LOUP (P=.007), but for DOM, the difference was not significant (P=.063).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the higher magnification used during tooth preparation played a significant role in the size of marginal gaps present around CAD-CAM crowns. Crown preparations finished by using fine grit diamond rotary instruments with a microscope at higher magnification than loupes resulted in a more precise marginal fit with smaller gaps.

Digitally manufactured partial coverage restorations: is it time to down the impression trays or still a work in progress?

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane library databases were used as the data sources for this systematic review. Manual search of the reference lists of the included studies was also conducted.

STUDY SELECTION

The aim of the systematic review was to compare a fully digital workflow to a fully conventional workflow in the fabrication of partial coverage restorations. Partial coverage restorations were defined as inlays, onlays, overlays and endocrowns. Four independent calibrated reviewers screened studies that fulfilled a predefined PICOS framework. Population was specified as an abutment tooth requiring a partial coverage restoration. The intervention was a fully digital workflow compared to a fully conventional workflow. Outcomes were accuracy, marginal and internal fit, success, survival, complication rates and patient-reported outcomes. Study design included both clinical and in vitro studies.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

A total of 23 articles were included in qualitative synthesis ranging from 2007 to 2021. Twenty-one of these were in vitro studies. Two authors independently reviewed the included articles, performed data extraction, and evaluated the risk of bias via an adapted Checklist for Reporting In Vitro studies (CRIS) for in vitro studies and Reporting Randomised Clinical studies (RoB2) for clinical studies.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies assessed the marginal and internal fit of onlay and inlay restorations, eight of which found that a conventional workflow demonstrated improved fit compared to digital, whilst the remaining nine studies found the contrary. Differing methods were utilised across the studies to assess fit, including: the silicone replica method, microcomputed tomography, microscopy and software-based measurements. Similar fracture strengths were reported between both conventional and digital workflows in three studies. One clinical study assessed survival rates of both pressed and CAD/CAM ceramic restorations and found the survival outcomes to be similar after seven years. No studies were found that investigated patient-reported outcomes or endocrowns.

CONCLUSIONS

No consensus was reached as to whether the digital or conventional workflow is better.

Accuracy and Efficiency of Digitally Fabricated All-Ceramic Crowns from Conventional Impressions and Intraoral Scans: A Single-Blind Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of intraoral scanners by comparing the marginal fit of 70 all-ceramic crowns fabricated from both conventional impressions and intraoral scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 70 posterior teeth requiring single-crown restorations randomly underwent either intraoral scanning or conventional impression-taking, followed by laboratory scanning of the casts in a parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT). Subsequently, 70 monolithic all-ceramic crowns were CAD/CAM fabricated; only the impression technique differed. The marginal fit, internal fit, adjustment time required for insertion and occlusal contacts, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores assessing dentists' satisfaction with the crowns were clinically evaluated by a calibrated examiner who was blinded to the groups. Data were analyzed using independent samples t test and likelihood-ratio test or Fisher exact test. All tests were performed with α = .05.

RESULTS

The mean marginal fit with intraoral scanning (57.94 Å} 22.51 μm) was better than with diagnostic cast scanning (82.98 Å} 21.72 μm). The difference was statistically significant (P = .000). The differences in internal fit, adjustment time for crown insertion and occlusal contacts, and VAS scores were also significant, and the secondary outcomes were in favor of intraoral scanning.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this clinical trial, CAD/CAM-fabricated single-tooth restorations in the posterior region produced with an intraoral scanning technique using TRIOS were found to be a more accurate, efficient alternative to restorations based on conventional impressions in combination with the laboratory scanning technique.

Accuracy of Dental Restorations Fabricated Using Milling vs 3D-Printed Molds: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of 12 different dental restorations fabricated with milling or 3D-printed molds and robotically controlled casting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve dental restorations (11 inlays and onlays and 1 crown) were made per restoration type, one per each of the 12 different teeth models (total of 24 restorations). On each tooth preparation, two restorations were manufactured using different CAD/ CAM techniques: (1) milling and (2) robotically controlled casting and 3D-printed molds. In addition, twolayer restorations were manufactured with 3D-printed molds. The marginal and internal gaps were evaluated at 120 points per restoration based on micro-CT 3D imaging. Internal gaps were evaluated using a replica technique with silicone.

RESULTS

Median values (interquartile ranges) for marginal gaps, middle internal gaps, and central internal gaps were significantly lower for 3D-printed mold restorations (44.3 [65.4] μm, 95.4 [96.2] μm, and 104.6 [78.1] μm) compared to milled restorations (58.4 [93] μm, 145.9 [85.8] μm, and 138.6 [65.7] μm). Internal gaps in the 3D-printed mold group were 6% to 51% smaller than in the milled group.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of restorations fabricated with 3D-printed molds may be preferable compared to milled restorations, except in the case of crown restoration. However, additional studies with a larger number of samples and different types of restorations are needed to confirm the results.

Accuracy of Occlusal Contacts of All-Ceramic Single Crowns Designed by Virtual Articulators from a CAD/CAM System: A Preliminary Evaluation

PURPOSE

To compare the static and dynamic occlusion of all-ceramic single crowns designed by mechanical and virtual articulators, by evalua6ng the accuracy of occlusal contacts of prostheses designed by virtual articulators and the feasibility of clinical application of CAD/CAM virtual articulators.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine subjects with an average age of 27 years who needed crown repair were recruited. After preparation of the all-ceramic crowns, two zirconia crowns were designed and fabricated through digital procedures and traditional methods. The intraoral scanner, Geomagic software, and T-Scan analyzer were used to analyze the occlusal contact points, areas, and the occlusal force percentage peak before the treatment and after the two crowns were temporarily fixed.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the number of occlusal contact points and areas between the mechanical group and control group (preoperation group), but there was no obvious difference between the virtual group and control group. The occlusal contact overlapping areas of the virtual-control group were significantly larger than those of the mechanical-control group. The occlusal force percentage peak of the tested teeth was slightly larger in the mechanical group than in the virtual group.

CONCLUSIONS

The posterior single crown designed by a virtual articulator restored the intercuspal occlusal better than one designed by a mechanical articulator, and it produced less dynamic occlusal interference. This finding suggests that virtual articulators can provide guidance for the design and adjustment of the occlusal surface of posterior single crown prostheses.

Marginal Fit and Internal Adaptation of Monolithic Zirconia 3-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis: In Vitro Study

PURPOSE

To compare the marginal and internal fit of monolithic zirconia (MZ) 3-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated using two CAD/CAM workflows: full-chairside (FCH) and lab (LAB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The right maxillary first premolar and first molar were prepared for MZ 3-unit FDPs on a typodont. CEREC Primescan digitized the typodont model 15 Omes. A total of 30 FDPs was fabricated using two processes: FCH (n = 15) and LAB (n = 15). FCH and LAB FDPs were designed using CEREC SW 4.5.1 and Exocad and milled using CEREC MC X and Zirkonzhan 600/V3, respectively. A fast-sintering protocol was used in both groups. A dual-scan technique was used to assess the cement space at the occlusal surface (OC), axial wall (AX), and margin (MA). Statistical analysis of the results was performed using univariate ANOVA with Scheff. post hoc test (a = .05).

RESULTS

Measurements in the FCH and LAB groups were within the clinically acceptable marginal and internal fit. The fit of FCH FDPs at MA, AX, and OC was 77.50 ± 29.99 μm, 99.67 ± 21.58 μm, and 150.03 ± 30.78 μm, respectively. The fit of LAB FDPs at MA, AX, and OC was 100.27 ± 27.06 μm, 116.53 ± 17.90 μm, and 142.30 ± 19.00 μm, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

MZ 3-unit FDPs fabricated using FCH have clinically acceptable marginal and internal fit. This result verifies the ability of FCH workflow to fabricate MZ mulOunit FDPs in a single visit.

Fabrication Trueness, Intaglio Surface Adaptation, and Marginal Integrity of Resin-Based Onlay Restorations Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing

PURPOSE

To evaluate the fabrication trueness, intaglio surface adaptation, and marginal integrity of resin-based onlay restorations made via additive manufacturing (AM) or subtractive manufacturing (SM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An onlay restoration was designed (DentalCAD Galway 3.0) and saved as an STL file to generate a design STL file (DO-STL). Using this design, 45 onlays were fabricated either with AM (3D-printed resin for definitive [AM-D; Tera Harz TC-80DP] and interim [AM-I; Freeprint temp] restorations) or SM (composite resin, Tetric CAD) technologies. Onlays were scanned with an intraoral scanner (CEREC Primescan SW 5.2), and the scans were saved as test STL files (TO-STLs). For trueness evaluation, TO-STLs were superimposed over the DO-STL, and root mean square (RMS) values of overall and intaglio surfaces were measured (Geomagic Control X). For the intaglio surface adaptation and marginal integrity, a triple-scan protocol was performed. Kolmogorov-Smirnov, one-way ANOVA, and post-hoc Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used to analyze data (α = .05).

RESULTS

RMS values of intaglio and overall surfaces, intaglio adaptation, and marginal integrity varied among test groups (P < .001). AM-D had the greatest overall surface RMS (P < .001), while SM had the greatest intaglio surface RMS (P < .001). SM had the highest average distance deviations for intaglio surface adaptation and marginal integrity, whereas AM-D had the lowest (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

AM-D onlays showed lower overall trueness than AM-I onlays and SM definitive onlays. However, AM-D onlays presented high intaglio surface trueness, intaglio surface adaptation, and marginal integrity.

Fit and Strength of a Three-Unit Temporary Prosthesis Made by Different Manufacturing Techniques: An In Vitro Study

PURPOSE

To compare the fit and fracture load of temporary fixed partial prostheses fabricated by means of a conventional direct technique, milling, or 3D printing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A maxillary right first premolar and molar were prepared on a Frasaco cast, which was then duplicated 40 times. In total, 10 provisional three-unit fixed prostheses (Protemp 4, 3M) were made using the conventional technique with a putty mold. The 30 remaining casts were scanned to design a provisional restoration using CAD software. A total of 10 designs were milled (CEREC MC X5/shaded PMMA Disk, Dentsply Sirona), while the other 20 were 3D printed with one of the two 3D printers (Asiga UV MAX or Nextdent 5100, C&B, Nextdent). Internal and marginal fit were examined using the replica technique. Next, the restorations were cemented on their respective casts and loaded until fracture using a universal testing machine. The location and propagation of the fracture were also evaluated.

RESULTS

3D printing demonstrated the best internal fit. Nextdent (median internal fit: 132 μm) was significantly better compared to the milled (median internal fit: 185 μm; P = .006) and conventional restorations (median internal fit: 215 μm; P < .001), while the fit of Asiga (median internal fit: 152 μm) was only significantly better than the conventional restorations (P < .012). The lowest marginal discrepancy was found for the milled restorations (median marginal fit: 96 μm), but this was only significant when compared to the conventional group (median internal fit: 163 μm; P < .001). The conventional restorations demonstrated the lowest fracture load (median fracture load: 536 N), which was only significant when compared to Asiga (median fracture load: 892 N; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the present in vitro study's limitations, CAD/CAM demonstrated superior fit and strength compared to the conventional technique.

Effect of a new support design on the marginal and internal gap of additively manufactured interim crowns using direct light deposition technology

PURPOSE

To investigate the design and location of supporting structures on the marginal and internal gap of interim restorations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mandibular right first molar resin tooth was prepared for a full coverage crown and scanned using a laboratory scanner (3Shape D900). The scanned data were converted into standard tessellation language (STL) format and an indirect prosthesis was designed using computer-aided design (CAD) software (exocad DentalCAD). The STL file was used to fabricate a total of 60 crowns with a 3D printer (EnvisionTEC Vida HD). The crowns were printed using E-Dent C&B MH resin and divided into 4 groups based on four different support structure designs, including supports on the occlusal (0° group), buccal and occlusal (45° group), buccal (90° group), and a new design consisting of horizontal bars placed on all surfaces and line angles (Bar) (n = 15). The silicone replica technique was used to determine the gap discrepancy. Fifty measurements were obtained for each specimen to examine the marginal and internal gaps by using a digital microscope (Olympus SZX16) at ×70 magnification. Additionally, the marginal discrepancy at different locations of the tested crowns, including buccal (B), lingual (L), mesial (M), and distal (D), as well as the maximum and minimum marginal gap intervals among groups, were analyzed. The collected data were analyzed using factorial ANOVA, followed by the Tukey HSD test for multiple comparisons (a = 0.05).

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in marginal and internal gaps among the groups (p < 0.001). The buccal placement supports (90° group) had the least marginal and internal discrepancies (p < 0.001). The new design group showed the highest marginal and internal gap. The marginal discrepancy in different locations of the tested crowns (B, L, M, D) was found to be significantly different among the groups (p < 0.001). The mesial margin of the Bar group had the largest marginal gap, whereas the buccal margin of the 90° group had the lowest marginal gap. The new design had a significantly smaller difference between the maximum and minimum marginal gap intervals than other groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The location and design of the supporting structures affected the marginal and internal gaps of an interim crown. The buccal placement of supporting bars (90° printing orientation) showed the smallest mean internal and marginal discrepancies.

Effect of ceramic materials and tooth preparation design on computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing endocrown adaptation and retentive strength: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate how various tooth preparation designs impact the adaptation-both at the margins and internally-and the retentive strength of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) produced endocrowns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

60 extracted human mandibular first molars were endodontically treated and assigned into three groups (n = 20) according to the tooth preparation design: Group N: butt joint design, Group F and F1 received 1- and 2-mm circumferential ferrule preparation, respectively. Endocrowns were milled using either lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS emax ceramic) or monolithic zirconia. The internal and marginal adaptation of the endocrowns were evaluated using the replica technique. After cementation, the endocrowns of all test groups were dislodged axially at 0.5 mm/min using a universal testing machine. A 2-way ANOVA and the independent samples t-test (α = .05) were performed to statistically analyze the data.

RESULTS

The effect of changing the design of the tooth preparation (butt joint, ferrule) on the marginal and internal gap was shown to be statistically significant (p < .05); the lower gap values were recorded at the axial followed by cervical, marginal, and pulpal floor walls in both ceramic groups regardless of the teeth preparation design. The ANOVA test revealed similar average removal forces and stresses for the two types of tested ceramic materials.

CONCLUSION

IPS emax ceramic adapted better than monolithic zirconia ceramic, regardless of the preparation design. Ferrule preparation design is more retentive than butt joint preparation, regardless of the type of ceramic material used.

Trueness, precision, time-efficiency and cost analysis of chairside additive and subtractive versus lab-based workflows for manufacturing single crowns: An in vitro study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the trueness, precision, time efficiency, and cost of three different workflows for manufacturing single crowns (SCs).

METHODS

A plaster model with a prepared tooth (#15) was scanned with an industrial scanner, and an SC was designed in computer-assisted-design (CAD) software. Ten SCs were printed with a hybrid composite (additive chairside) and a stereolithographic (SLA) printer (Dfab®), 10 SCs were milled in lithium disilicate (subtractive chairside) using a chairside milling unit (inLab MC XL®), and 10 SCs were milled in zirconia (lab-based) using a five-axis laboratory machine (DWX-52D®). All SCs were scanned with the same scanner after polymerization/sinterization. Each scan was superimposed to the marginal area of the original CAD file to evaluate trueness: absolute average (ABS AVG), root mean square (RMS), and (90˚-10˚)/2 percentile were calculated for each group. Marginal adaptation and quality of the occlusal and interproximal contact points were also investigated by two prosthodontists on 3D printed and plaster models. Finally, the three workflows' time efficiency and costs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Additive chairside and subtractive lab-based SCs had significantly better marginal trueness than subtractive chairside SCs in all three parameters (ABS AVG, p < 0.01; RMS, p < 0.01; [90˚-10˚]/2, p < 0.01). However, the two prosthodontists found no significant differences between the three manufacturing procedures in the quality of the marginal closure (p = 0.186), interproximal (p = 0.319), and occlusal contacts (p = 0.218). Both time efficiency and cost show a trend favoring the chairside additive workflow.

CONCLUSIONS

Chairside additive technology seems to represent a valid alternative for manufacturing definitive SCs, given the high marginal trueness, precision, workflow efficiency and low costs.

STATEMENT OF CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Additive chairside manufacturing of definitive hybrid composite SCs is now possible and shows high accuracy, time efficiency, and competitive cost.

Tooth morphology, internal fit, occlusion and proximal contacts of dental crowns designed by deep learning-based dental software: A comparative study

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the tooth morphology, internal fit, occlusion, and proximal contacts of dental crowns automatically generated via two deep learning (DL)-based dental software systems with those manually designed by an experienced dental technician using conventional software.

METHODS

Thirty partial arch scans of prepared posterior teeth were used. The crowns were designed using two DL-based methods (AA and AD) and a technician-based method (NC). The crown design outcomes were three-dimensionally compared, focusing on tooth morphology, internal fit, occlusion, and proximal contacts, by calculating the geometric relationship. Statistical analysis utilized the independent t-test, Mann-Whitney test, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc pairwise comparisons (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The AA and AD groups, with the NC group as a reference, exhibited no significant tooth morphology discrepancies across entire external or occlusal surfaces. The AD group exhibited higher root mean square and positive average values on the axial surface (P < .05). The AD and NC groups exhibited a better internal fit than the AA group (P < .001). The cusp angles were similar across all groups (P = .065). The NC group yielded more occlusal contact points than the AD group (P = .006). Occlusal and proximal contact intensities varied among the groups (both P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Crowns designed by using both DL-based software programs exhibited similar morphologies on the occlusal and axial surfaces; however, they differed in internal fit, occlusion, and proximal contacts. Their overall performance was clinically comparable to that of the technician-based method in terms of the internal fit and number of occlusal contact points.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

DL-based dental software for crown design can streamline the digital workflow in restorative dentistry, ensuring clinically-acceptable outcomes on tooth morphology, internal fit, occlusion, and proximal contacts. It can minimize the necessity of additional design optimization by dental technician.

DIGITAL DENTISTRY AND ITS IMPACT ON ORAL HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE

Over the past 50 years, digitization has gradually taken root in dentistry, starting with computer tomography in the 1970s. The most disruptive events in digital dentistry were the introduction of digital workflow and computer-aided manufacturing, which made new procedures and materials available for dental use. While the conventional lab-based workflow requires light or chemical curing under inconsistent and suboptimal conditions, computer-aided manufacturing allows for industrial-grade material, ensuring consistently high material quality. In addition, many other innovative, less disruptive, but relevant approaches have been developed in digital dentistry. These will have or already impact prevention, diagnosis, and therapy, thus impacting patients' oral health and, consequently, their oral health-related quality of life. Both software and hardware approaches attempt to maintain, restore, or optimize a patient's perceived oral health. This article outlines innovations in dentistry and their potential impact on patients' oral health-related quality of life in prevention and therapy. Furthermore, possible future developments and their potential implications are characterized.

Effect of modifying occlusal cement spacer on the fit accuracy of digitally manufactured zirconia crowns

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Cement spacer has a crucial influence on the adaptation of fixed restorations. Recently, digitally fabricated zirconia crowns have become more popular, but studies on the effect of occlusal cement spacer on the fit accuracy of digitally designed and milled zirconia crowns are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of modifying digital occlusal spacer on the marginal and internal fit of digitally manufactured zirconia crowns.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A maxillary molar typodont tooth was prepared for a zirconia crown, scanned with the Medit i700 intraoral scanner (IOS), and the standard tessellation language (STL) file was used to produce 3-dimensionally (3D) printed definitive dies assigned to 3 groups (n=12). All dies were scanned with the IOS, and the obtained STL files were exported to a computer-aided design (CAD) software program for the designing and milling of 36 complete contour zirconia crowns. The zirconia crown design was identical in the 3 groups for all parameters (default parameters in the CAD software program) with a 80-µm radial spacer 1 mm from the finish lines. The occlusal cement spacer was adjusted to 80 µm, 40 µm, and 0 µm for group 80-80, group 40-80, and group 0-80 respectively. The internal and marginal fit of the crowns were measured on their corresponding definitive dies with the replica technique. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn test with the Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis of the results (α=.05).

RESULTS

The modification of occlusal cement spacer significantly affected the marginal and internal fit of digitally manufactured crowns (P<.05). Group 0-80 and group 40-80 had similar marginal gap values, which were significantly lower than those of group 80-80 (P<.017). For internal fit accuracy, group 0-80 displayed significantly lower gap values than group 40-80 and group 80-80 for all measured areas. Group 40-80 had significantly lower gap values than group 80-80 at the mid-occlusal and axio-occlusal areas (P<.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Modifying occlusal cement spacer significantly affected the fit of digitally fabricated zirconia crowns. Reducing or eliminating occlusal spacer resulted in significantly improved fit accuracy.

CAD/CAM full-mouth rehabilitation of an elderly patient: One-piece digital complete denture meets multilayered zirconia with gradient technology

OBJECTIVE

This article highlights a CAD/CAM complete-mouth rehabilitation in an 82-year-old patient by means of a complete maxillary prosthesis and mandibular implant- and tooth-supported fixed restorations made from multilayered zirconia.

CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Comprehensive complete-mouth rehabilitations in elderly patients with adaptation of the occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) often present particular challenges. This applies especially when exacting functional and esthetic requirements are to be met and the treatment should not cause the patient too much effort, still ensuring the highest level of quality and efficiency and a low intervention rate.

CONCLUSION

The digital approach used for the present patient allowed for an efficient treatment procedure, facilitated virtual evaluations using a face-scan, and enhanced the predictability of the prosthodontic outcome. The approach enabled some steps required in the conventional protocol to be omitted, resulting in a straightforward clinical treatment with minimal strain on the patient.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Because of the comprehensive recording of extraoral and intraoral data, for example with a facial scanner, it was possible to transfer a digital replica of the patient to the dental laboratory technician. With this protocol, many steps can be performed in the absence of the real patient.

Evaluation of the efficiency, trueness, and clinical application of novel artificial intelligence design for dental crown prostheses

OBJECTIVE

The unique structure of human teeth limits dental repair to custom-made solutions. The production process requires a lot of time and manpower. At present, artificial intelligence (AI) has begun to be used in the medical field and improve efficiency. This study attempted to design a variety of dental restorations using AI and evaluate their clinical applicability.

METHODS

Using inlay and crown restoration types commonly used in dental standard models, we compared differences in artificial wax-up carving (wax-up), artificial digital designs (digital) and AI designs (AI). The AI system was designed using computer calculations, and the other two methods were designed by humans. Restorations were made by 3D printing resin material. Image evaluations were compared with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) by calculating the root mean squared error.

RESULTS

Surface truth results showed that AI (68.4 µm) and digital-designed crowns (51.0 µm) had better reproducibility. Using AI for the crown reduced the time spent by 400% (compared to digital) and 900% (compared to wax-up). Optical microscopic and CBCT images showed that AI and digital designs had close margin gaps (p < 0.05). The margin gap of the crown showed that the wax-up group was 4.1 and 4.3 times greater than those of the AI and digital crowns, respectively. Therefore, the utilization of artificial intelligence can assist in the production of dental restorations, thereby enhancing both production efficiency and accuracy.

SIGNIFICANCE

It is expected that the development of AI can contribute to the reproducibility, efficiency, and goodness of fit of dental restorations.

Effect of Thermomechanical Fatigue Loading on the Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Endocrowns Utilizing Different CAD/CAM Restorative Materials

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of fatigue loading on the internal and marginal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated endocrowns for restoring endodontically treated molars using different machinable blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 72 mandibular first molars were prepared using a standardized method and were divided into four groups (n = 18), each restored with a different CAD/CAM material: group V = polymer-infiltrated ceramic (Vita Enamic); group K = partially stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Katana); group E = lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD; and group B = polyetheretherketone (BioHPP). Endocrowns were subjected to thermomechanical fatigue loading. Internal and marginal adaptation of the endocrowns were examined at 66 points using the sectioning technique and a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test (α = .05).

RESULTS

Statistical tests showed that adhesive cementation resulted in significantly increased marginal and internal gap values in all regions in all four tested groups (P < .001). After thermomechanical fatigue loading, all regions in groups B and K showed a statistically significant difference, while no significant differences were found in the regions in group V (P > .05). In group E, the marginal (F = 71.00) and pulpal (F = 28.065) regions showed statistically significant differences (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Polymer-infiltrated ceramics showed the lowest gap even after thermomechanical fatigue loading and may therefore provide enhanced clinical survival of the restored tooth, favoring the use of this material for fabricating endocrown restorations.

Marginal and internal fit of five-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with digital scans and conventional impressions: A comparative in vitro study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the marginal and internal fit of five-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated using digital scans and conventional impressions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine master models with three zirconia abutments were scanned with an intraoral scanner (test group), and nine conventional impressions (control group) of these same models were also made. The stone casts from these impressions were scanned with a laboratory extraoral scanner (D700, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). A total of 18 five-unit zirconia-based FDP frameworks (test group, n = 9; control group, n = 9) were manufactured. Marginal and internal fit (in μm) were evaluated using the replica method under micro-computed tomography. Analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare continuous variables across two groups. A level of p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation of the marginal fit was 95.03 ± 12.74 μm in the test group and 106.02 ± 14.51 μm in the control group. The lowest marginal mean value was observed in the test group, with a statistically significant difference compared to the control group (F = 14.56, p < 0.05). The mean ± standard deviation of the internal fit was 103.61 ± 9.32 and 106.38 ± 7.64 μm, respectively, in the test and control groups, with no statistically significant difference (F = 1.56, p > 0.05). The mean values of both groups were clinically acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

The five-unit zirconia-based FDPs fabricated with digital scans showed better fit than those in the conventional impression group. Within the limitations of this study, these results are encouraging, and continued progress in the digital field should allow for more accurate long-span restorations.

Application of CAD/CAM technologies and materials for prosthetic restoration of severely damaged teeth-clinical cases

In cases of severely damaged teeth with limited coronal tooth structure and remaining hard dental tissues subgingivally, a custom-made post-and-core restoration is required. Teeth with non-circular canal space also require this type of restoration because the build-up with pre-fabricated posts could lead to thick cement layer. The development of CAD/CAM technologies widens the range of the materials that can be used for prosthetic restorations. Along with base dental alloys, newly developed materials may be applied. The aim of the article is to present four clinical cases of severely damaged teeth which utilize different materials and different production techniques for custom post-and-core fabrication. In the first clinical case, a metal post-and-core restoration was fabricated by direct metal laser sintering. In the second clinical case, digital technologies were used to produce a 3D-printed resin prototype for further investing and casting from base metal dental alloy. In the third clinical case, fibre-reinforced composite was used for fabrication of the custom post-and-core by milling. In the fourth clinical case, the restoration is produced by milling of lithium disilicate ceramics IPS emax CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Lichtenstein). The bond between the fibre-reinforced composite post-and-core and the hard dental tissues offered possibility to compensate-to some extent-the shape of the preparation which was not optimal. CAD/CAM technologies applied in these clinical cases provided combination of high accuracy of fitting with good stability and individual shape of the restorations. © 2023 Australian Dental Association.

Adaptation and uniformity of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by additive 3-dimensional gel deposition

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

A novel monolithic zirconia restoration fabricated by additive 3-dimensional (3D) gel deposition, named as self-glazed zirconia (SGZ), has recently been developed. SGZ crowns exhibit reliable mechanical properties and esthetic appearance, but their adaptation and uniformity are unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the adaptation and uniformity of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by additive 3D gel deposition with that of milled zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten identical resin abutments were made based on the scanning data of an extracted and prepared human mandibular first molar. Three types of monolithic crowns were then fabricated by using 2 different processes: 3D gel deposition zirconia (SGZ), milled zirconia (ZZ), and milled lithium disilicate (EMX) (n=10) through a completely digital workflow. The nondestructive direct-view technique and replica technique were used to measure the marginal and internal discrepancy values individually. The uniformity index was calculated to describe the uniformity of the internal space. The results were analyzed by using 1-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests (α=.05).

RESULTS

The marginal discrepancy of EMX exhibited the highest values among the 3 groups (P=.001). The 2 types of zirconia crowns had comparable marginal discrepancy values (P>.05). The internal discrepancy values of SGZ were significantly lower than those of EMX at the occlusal region and of ZZ at all measured locations (P<.05). All 3 types of monolithic crowns showed comparable good uniformity (P=.056).

CONCLUSIONS

The marginal and internal adaptations of novel monolithic zirconia crowns were within clinical requirements. Compared with the zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by subtractive milling, monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by additive 3D gel deposition had comparable uniformity and better internal adaptation.

Accuracy of fit for cobaltchromium bar over two implants fabricated with different manufacturing techniques: an in-vitro study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the invitro research was to compare the fit of Cobalt Chromium customized bar fabricated with different manufacturing processes cast metal bar, milled bar and 3D printed bar using scanning electron microscope.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clear epoxy resin molds were prepared. In each mold two parallel implants with a 14 mm distance from each other were embedded. Thirty Co-Cr custom bars were constructed and were divided equally into three groups: Group (I) (Co-Cr conv), group (II) milled bar (Co-Cr milled), and group (III) printed bar (Co-Cr print). The marginal fit at implant-abutment interface was scanned using scanning electron microscope (SEM).

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the three studied groups regarding marginal misfit the between implant and fabricated bars with p-value < 0.001. The highest value of micro-gap distance was found in Co-Cr conventional group (7.95 ± 2.21 μm) followed by Co-Cr 3D printed group (4.98 ± 1.73) and the lower value were found in Co-Cr milled (3.22 ± 0.75).

CONCLUSION

The marginal fit of milled, 3D printed and conventional cast for Co-Cr alloy were within the clinically acceptable range of misfit. CAD/CAM milled Co-Cr bar revealed a superior internal fit at the implant-abutment interface. This was followed by selective laser melting (SLM) 3D printed bar and the least fit was shown for customized bar with the conventional lost wax technique.

Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, control of the marginal fit of fixed dental prostheses is hindered by evaluation method, which needs to be further improved to increase its clinical applicability. This study aimed to quantitatively analyze the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated by conventional and digital technologies using a digital measurement method based on the digital impression technology and open source software.

METHODS

A digital workflow and the conventional impression combined with the lost-wax heat-pressed technique were adopted to separately fabricate 10 glass ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Three-dimensional data for the abutments, fixed dental prostheses, and fixed dental prostheses seated on the abutments, were obtained using a dental scanner. The two datasets were aligned using registration technology, specifically "multi-points registration" and "best fit alignment," by reverse engineering software. Subsequently, the three-dimensional seated fit between the fixed dental prostheses and abutments were reconstructed. The margin of the abutment and crown was extracted using edge-sharpening and other functional modules, and the absolute marginal discrepancy was measured by the distance between the margin of the abutment and crown. One-way analysis of variance was used to statistically analyze the measurement results.

RESULTS

Using the digital measurement method, the mean value of absolute marginal discrepancy for fixed dental prostheses fabricated by the conventional method was 106.69 ± 6.46 μm, and that fabricated by the digital workflow was 102.55 ± 6.96 μm. The difference in the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using the two methods was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The digital measurement method for absolute marginal discrepancy was preliminarily established based on open source software and applied in three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses. The absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using digital technology was comparable to that of conventional technique.

Clinical Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Single Metal-Ceramic Crowns Fabricated with Casting, Milling, and Milling/Sintering Methods

PURPOSE

To compare the adaptation of single metal-ceramic crowns (MCCs) fabricated with three different methods: lost-wax metal casting (LMC), milling of hard cobalt-chromium (HCC) blanks, and milling of soft presintered cobalt-chromium (SCC) blanks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this double-blind parallel randomized clinical trial, 60 single MCCs were fabricated using three different methods. Adaptation of the copings was evaluated radiographically, visually, and microscopically. Data were compared among the three groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dunn post hoc test, one-way ANOVA, and paired t test (α = .05).

RESULTS

Radiographic data showed that the frequency of crowns with no marginal discrepancy was significantly higher in the SCC group than the LMC group. Evaluation of marginal adaptation with an explorer revealed that crowns with excellent marginal adaptation had lower frequency in the LMC group than the HCC and SCC groups. In the silicone replica technique, the recorded data revealed no significant difference. Application of porcelain veneering did not affect the adaptation of the copings.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCC and HCC groups showed better clinical outcomes compared to the LMC group. However, all MCCs fabricated with the LMC method, milling of HCC blanks, and milling of SCC blanks had acceptable clinical adaptation. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36:581-587.

Influence of the Crystallization Firing Process on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Silicate-based Glass-ceramic Inlays Fabricated With a CAD/CAM Chairside System

OBJECTIVE

Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems are widely used in dental treatment. Clinicians can use chairside CAD/CAM technology, which has the advantage of being able to fabricate inlays on the same day. We aimed to evaluate the effects of crystallization firing processes, fabrication methods (one-step and two-step), and materials on marginal and internal adaptations of silicate-based glass-ceramic all-ceramic inlays fabricated with CAD/CAM chairside systems.

METHODS

Ten artificial mandibular left first molars were prepared with standardized ceramic class II mesialocclusal (MO) inlay cavities. Optical impressions were obtained using CEREC Omnicam Ban. IPS e-max CAD (IE), (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Initial LiSi Block (LS) (Hongo, Bunkyoku, Tokyo, Japan), VITA Suprinity (SP), (Vita Zahnfabrick, Bad Säckingen, Germany), and Celtra Duo (CD) (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (n=10) were milled using CEREC MC XL (Bensheim, Germany). IE and SP were crystallization-fired using CEREC Speed Fire. The silicone replica technique was used for the measurement of internal (axial and pulpal walls) and marginal (cervical and occlusal edge) adaptations. The adaptations were measured using a thin layer of light-body polyvinyl siloxane impression material placed between the master tooth inlay preparation and restoration. Marginal and internal adaptations of IE, LS, SP, and CD were measured using a stereomicroscope (500×). For IE and SP, marginal and internal adaptations were measured before and after the crystallization firing process. Data analyses were conducted using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey test. For IE and SP, marginal and internal adaptations before and after the crystallization firing process were analyzed using the t-test. The significance level was set at α=0.05.

RESULTS

One-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences in occlusal and cervical edge marginal adaptations among the material groups (p<0.001). The Tukey HSD test revealed a significant difference in marginal occlusal and cervical edge adaptations between LS and CD groups and IE and SP groups (p≤0.05). For IE and SP inlays, the t-test revealed a significant difference between occlusal and cervical edge adaptations before the crystallization firing process and those after the crystallization firing process, with the latter group showing a more significant discrepancy in adaptation than the former group (p≤0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fabrication methods (one- and two-step) affected the marginal adaptation compatibility but not internal compatibility of MO inlays. The crystallization firing process affected the marginal adaptation of inlays using lithium silicate or lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. However, adaptation to the cavity was considered clinically acceptable for all materials.

Evaluating the Marginal and Internal Discrepancy of Nickel-Chrome Copings Made on Fixed Partial Denture Implants with Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal discrepancy of nickel-chrome (Ni-Cr) copings made on implant bridges with conventional and 3D printing techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

30 three-unit Ni-Cr FDPs (60 copings) were made by 3D-printing technique (PolyJet group), lost-wax method with die spacer technique (die spacer group), and lost-wax method with burn-out the cap (burn-out cap group). Then, the frames obtained from the three methods were checked to examine the marginal discrepancy by stereomicroscope after preparation and polishing. The silicon replica method was used to investigate the internal discrepancy at 6 points (buccal portion of occlusal surface, lingual portion of occlusal surface, middle area of the axial surface in the lingual, middle area of the axial surface in the buccal, cervico-buccal area, and cervico-lingual area). Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed first to estimate the normality of data distribution. A one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test were done for comparing marginal and internal discrepancies between groups. The significant level was considered p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation of marginal discrepancy in the PolyJet group, die spacer group, and burn-out cap group was 37.9 ± 15, 68.8 ± 31.8 and 42.7 ± 3.6 µm for buccal margins and 40.4 ± 12.3, 64 ± 21.7, and 42.4 ± 2.1 µm for lingual margins, respectively. The means of buccal and lingual marginal discrepancy in the burn-out cap group and PolyJet group were significantly lower than the die spacer group (p < 0.001). Marginal discrepancy was not statistically different between the burn-out cap group and the PolyJet group. The mean ± standard deviation of overall internal discrepancy in the PolyJet group, die spacer group, and burn-out cap group was 64.6 ± 3.7, 72 ± 22.2, and 58.7 ± 2 µm, respectively. There was a significant difference between the mean of internal discrepancy between three groups (p = 0.001). The mean of internal discrepancy of the burn-out cap group was significantly lower than the die spacer group (p = 0.001) and PolyJet group (p = 0.005). Internal discrepancy was not significantly different between the PolyJet group and the die spacer group (p = 0.168).

CONCLUSION

The marginal and internal gap rates of the three groups were within clinically acceptable limits. The 3D printing technique and lost-wax method with burn-out the cap had the lowest buccal and lingual marginal discrepancies. The burn-out cap method had better fitness and less internal discrepancy than 3D printing and die spacer groups.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Lower marginal discrepancy of copings fabricated by using 3D printed patterns may improve clinical success of implant restoration. How to cite this article: Ziaei M, Bajoghli F, Sabouhi M, et al. Evaluating the Marginal and Internal Discrepancy of Nickel-Chrome Copings Made on Fixed Partial Denture Implants with Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(11):826-833.

Biocompatibility and biofilm formation on conventional and CAD/CAM provisional implant restorations

Dental implant treatment is a complex and sophisticated process, and implant provisional restorations play a vital role in ensuring its success. The advent of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology has revolutionized the field of implant restorations by providing improved precision leading to a reduction in chair time and more predictable treatment outcomes. This technology offers a promising solution to the drawbacks of conventional methods and has the potential to transform the way implant procedures are approached. Despite the clear advantages of CAD/CAM over conventional provisional implant restorations including higher accuracy of fit and superior mechanical properties, little research has been conducted on the biological aspect of these novel restorations. This study aims to fill that gap, comprehensively assessing the biocompatibility, gingival tissue attachment and biofilm formation of a range of provisional implant restorations using CAD/CAM technology through milling and 3-D printing processes compared to conventional fabrication. The biocompatibility of the tested restorations was assessed by MTT assay, Calcein-AM assay as well as SEM analysis. The surface roughness of the tested samples was evaluated, alongside the attachment of Human Gingival Fibroblasts (HGF) cells as well as biofilm formation, and estimated Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) cell count from DNA detection.The results showed all tested provisional implant restorations were non-toxic and good HGF cell attachment but differed in their quantity of biofilm formation, with surface texture influenced by the material and fabrication technique, playing a role. Within the limitation of this study, the findings suggest that CAD/CAM-fabricated provisional implant restorations using a milling technique may be the most favourable among tested groups in terms of biocompatibility and periodontal-related biofilm formation.

Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D-printing technique

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of printing layer thickness on the marginal and internal fit of interim crowns.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A maxillary first molar model was prepared for ceramic restoration. Thirty-six crowns were printed with three different layer thicknesses using a digital light processing-based three-dimensional printer (25, 50, and 100 µm [LT 25, LT 50, and LT 100]). The marginal and internal gaps of the crowns were measured with replica technique. An analysis of variance was conducted to determine if there were significant differences between the groups (ɑ = .05).

RESULTS

The marginal gap of LT 100 group was significantly higher than that LT 25 (p = .002) and LT 50 groups (p ≤ .001). The LT 25 group has significantly larger axial gaps than LT 50 group (p = .013); however, there were no statistically significant differences between other groups. The LT 50 group showed the smallest axio-occlusal gap. The mean occlusal gap differed significantly by printing layer thickness (p ≤ .001), with the largest gap occurring for LT 100.

CONCLUSIONS

Provisional crowns printed with 50 µm layer thickness provided the best marginal and internal fit.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

It is recommended that provisional crowns be printed with a 50 µm layer thickness to ensure optimal marginal and internal fit.

An in vitro comparison of the marginal fit of provisional crowns using the virtual tooth preparation workflow against the traditional technique

Aim

This study investigates the effectiveness of an innovative virtual tooth preparation workflow for the fabrication of dental crowns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanners (IOSs) with conventional workflow using extraoral/laboratory scanners.

Settings and Design

This in vitro experimental study was conducted in the laboratory of a university in Chennai, India. The dental laboratory and research facilities at the institution were utilized for the fabrication of the temporary crowns and the data acquisition process.

Materials and Methods

Institutional approval was obtained from the university. It was basically a comparison between the virtual prep technique using CBCT and IOS and the conventional digital technique using extra oral scanners (EOS) for temporary crown fabrication. The sample size was estimated using an effect size of 1.5004, assuming a normal distribution, a significance level of 0.05, and a power of 0.95 in G power software. Based on this calculation, an extracted second lower molar was used to fabricate 10 samples in each group. The samples were divided into three groups: the CBCT (Group 1), the IOS (Group 2), and laboratory scanner (Group 3 as control) groups. The vertical marginal gap of all the surfaces of the crown was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope.

Statistical Analysis Used

Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA using the SPSS software version 26.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA.

Results

Acceptable marginal discrepancy values were obtained in all three groups. There was no significant difference in the marginal discrepancy recorded (P = 0.113).

Conclusion

Virtual tooth preparation using CBCT and IOSs can be used as an alternative to the conventional workflow for provisional crown and bridge fabrication.

Effect of build angle on the dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with the nanoparticle jetting technique

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The build angle is an essential parameter in additive manufacturing. Its effect on the dimensional accuracy of zirconia restorations fabricated using the nanoparticle jetting (NPJ) technique is unknown.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the build angle on the dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia complete crowns fabricated by using NPJ.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Standardized artificial right maxillary incisors and mandibular first molars were prepared for ceramic complete crowns. In total, 100 monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated using NPJ at build angles of 0, 45, 90, 135, and 180 degrees (n=10/angle for incisors and molars). The dimensional accuracies in the external, marginal, and intaglio regions were determined by superimposing the scanned data and computer-aided design data on the crowns. Root mean square (RMS) values were used to analyze the accuracy of the zirconia crowns overall and at the external, marginal, and intaglio surfaces. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to examine the normality of data distribution. Differences among test groups were assessed using a 1-way analysis of variance and the post hoc least significant difference test (α=.05).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in the accuracy of monolithic zirconia incisor and molar complete crowns in the external, marginal, and intaglio regions among the 5 build angles (P<.05). For incisors, the external RMS value was lowest for a build angle of 45 degrees (18.2 ±3.0 µm), the marginal and intaglio RMS values were lowest for a build angle of 135 degrees (47.4 ±10.7 and 26.5 ±6.1 µm, respectively), and the overall RMS values did not differ significantly among the 5 build angles (P>.05). For molars, build angles of 0 degrees and 180 degrees yielded the lowest RMS values overall (22.3 ±1.5 and 21.8 ±3.2 µm, respectively) and in the external (23.2 ±2.9 and 22.3 ±2.5 µm, respectively) and intaglio (22.2 ±3.7 and 21.2 ±4.6 µm, respectively) regions. No significant difference was observed in the marginal area among the 5 build angles (P>.05). The overall RMS values reflecting dimensional accuracy for the 5 build angles were between 23.5 and 26.7 µm for incisors and 21.8 and 26.2 µm for molars.

CONCLUSIONS

The dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using NPJ was affected by the build angle and was within clinically acceptable limits.

Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single crowns manufactured with an analog workflow and three CAD-CAM systems: A prospective clinical study

PURPOSE

This prospective clinical study evaluated and compared the marginal and internal fit of crowns fabricated with an analog workflow and three different computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five participants in need of a single complete-coverage molar or premolar crown were recruited in the study. Twenty-two completed the study, and three participants dropped out. Teeth were prepared according to a standardized protocol by one operator. For each participant, one final impression was made with polyether material (PP) and three intraoral scanners: CEREC Omnicam (C), Planmeca Planscan (PM), and True Definition (TR). For the PP group, crowns were fabricated with a pressable lithium disilicate ceramic, whereas for the other three groups (C, PM, and TR), crowns were designed and milled with dedicated CAD-CAM systems and materials. Marginal (vertical and horizontal) and internal discrepancies between the crowns and tooth preparation were measured at various locations with digital superimposition software. Data was analyzed for normality with Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests and then compared with one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

RESULTS

Mean vertical marginal gap values were 92.18 ± 141.41 μm (PP), 150.12 ± 138.06 μm (C), 129.07 ± 109.96 μm (PM), and 135.09 ± 112.03 μm (TR). PP group had statistically significantly smaller vertical marginal discrepancy (p = 0.001) than all other groups, whereas no significant difference was detected among the three CAD-CAM systems (C, PM, and TR). Horizontal marginal discrepancies were 104.93 ± 111.96 μm (PP), 89.49 ± 119.66 μm (C), 113.36 ± 128.49 μm (PM), and 136.39 ± 142.52 μm (TR). A significant difference was detected only between C and TR (p < 0.0001). Values for the internal fit were 128.40 ± 49.31μm (PP), 190.70 ± 69.79μm (C), 146.30 ± 57.70 μm (PM), and 168.20 ± 86.67 μm (TR). The PP group had a statistically significant smaller internal discrepancy than C (p < 0.0001) and TR groups (p = 0.001), whereas no significant difference was found compared to the PM group.

CONCLUSION

Posterior crowns fabricated with CAD-CAM systems showed vertical margin discrepancy greater than 120 μm. Only crowns fabricated with the conventional methodology had vertical margins below 100 μm. Horizontal marginal discrepancy was different among all groups, and only CEREC CAD-CAM was below 100 μm. Internal discrepancy was less for crowns fabricated with an analog workflow.

A novel technique for implant-supported fixed complete rehabilitation based on a dynamic virtual patient

BACKGROUND

A digital workflow for implant-supported fixed complete prostheses (ISFCP) using photogrammetry (PG), virtual articulator (VA), and virtual facebow (VF) data remains a challenge.

METHODS

The novel ISFCP technique included four steps: (1) formation of a dynamic virtual patient, (2) integration of PG data, (3) fabrication of a diagnostic ISFCP, and (4) fabrication of a definitive ISFCP and test of the deviation.

RESULTS

Dynamic virtual patients were formed by integrating PG, VA, and VF data. The cumulative root mean square deviation between the designed data and actual definitive prosthesis was 140.4 µm.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel technique for ISFCP fabrication described in this paper can help optimise the clinical efficiency and quality of ISFCP but requires an initial learning curve.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This technique provides a direct workflow, using PG, VA, and VF data, to fabricate ISFCP based on the provisional restoration.

Zirconia restorations and the tool diameter compensation

AIM

The aim of the present article is to describe a new method to reduce the undesirable loss of material thickness that results from overmilling due to the tool diameter compensation correction of common CAD/CAM software.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Today's CAD/CAM software (eg, 3Shape or Exocad) specifies the same tool diameter compensation for different ceramics. In the case of zirconia ceramics milled in the raw state, this leads to excessive milling of the inner surfaces of crowns, which results in unnecessarily large cementation gaps and a restoration that is thinned out from the inside. By manually reducing the preset correction in the digital design process by the volumetric sintering shrinkage factor specified by the manufacturer, excessive thinning of the zirconia can be avoided.

RESULTS

The inner geometry of the restorations changes only slightly after manually reducing the preset tool diameter compensation correction. Consequently, a design of the restoration with the required minimum interocclusal thickness yet with accurate passive seating and marginal fit is possible without any further interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the specifics of the subtractive fabrication process as well as the properties of the restorative materials is a key factor in achieving optimal clinical outcomes with all-ceramic restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology. The use of monolithic zirconia combined with a calculated reduction in the preset tool diameter compensation correction might be beneficial in cases with thin or uneven geometry.

Fabrication trueness and internal fit of hybrid abutment crowns fabricated by using additively and subtractively manufactured resins

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the fabrication trueness and internal fit of hybrid abutment crowns fabricated by using additively and subtractively manufactured restorative materials.

METHODS

A maxillary first premolar crown with a screw access channel was designed onto a digitized master titanium base abutment. This file was used to fabricate 40 crowns additively (Crowntec (CT) and VarseoSmile Crown Plus (VS)) or subtractively (Brilliant Crios (BC) and Vita Enamic (EN)) (n = 10). Crowns were digitized with an intraoral scanner and root mean square method was used to evaluate fabrication trueness. Master abutment and the crowns when seated on the abutment were also digitized with the same intraoral scanner and triple scan method was used to evaluate internal fit. Data were analyzed either with 1-way ANOVA (surface deviations) or Kruskal-Wallis (internal fit) tests (α= 0.05).

RESULTS

CT had the highest overall, external, and marginal surface deviations (P≤.030), whereas BC had the lowest external (P≤.001) and VS and EN had the lowest marginal surface deviations (P≤.007). BC had the highest intaglio surface deviations (P<.001). BC and EN had higher average gap values CT and VS (P≤.006); however, the differences within additively and subtractively manufactured materials were nonsignificant (P≥.858).

CONCLUSIONS

One of the tested additively manufactured resins (CT) resulted in mostly lower trueness than that of other materials. However, deviations at the intaglio and marginal surfaces were generally small and the maximum mean difference among test groups when average gap was considered was 17.4 µm. Therefore, clinical fit of hybrid abutment crowns fabricated with tested materials may be similar.

Conventional cast vs. CAD/CAM post and core in a fully digital chairside workflow - An in vivo comparative study of accuracy of fit and feasibility of impression taking

OBJECTIVES

Clinical data for CAD/CAM post and cores (PC) is still scarce, even though developments in digital dentistry have improved dental treatment in many aspects. Therefore, the purpose of this in vivo study was to compare CAD/CAM PC fabricated in a fully digital chairside workflow to conventional cast PC (CPC) according to the accuracy of fit and the impression taking. The null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference between CAD/CAM PC and CPC.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 30 teeth in 25 patients receiving a CPC during their prosthetic treatment plan. On each tooth a conventional and a digital post impression were taken. Subsequently, one CPC following a conventional and one CAD/CAM PC following a digital workflow were fabricated. Both PC were tried-in intraorally and assessed according to a standardised evaluation sheet. The deviation between the two impression methods was evaluated by superimposing the datasets in a 3D analysis software. Statistical analysis for pairwise comparison was conducted according to Wilcoxon and median test with a significance level of p = 0.05.

RESULTS

CAD/CAM PC performed significantly better compared to CPC according to accuracy of fit (p = 0.022) and feasibility of impression taking (p < 0.001). The deviation between post impression methods increased from "coronal" to "apical". Between "coronal"/"middle" no significant difference (p = 0.158) was detected, whereas the pairwise comparison between the other measurement categories showed significant differences (p = 0.002, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The null hypothesis was rejected since CAD/CAM PC performed significantly better and the deviation between the post impression methods showed significant differences.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

By using intraoral scanners (IOS) teeth can be restored with customised CAD/CAM PC in a single session. Within the limitations of this study the fully digital chairside workflow led to superior accuracy of fit of PC and higher feasibility of impression taking than the conventional workflow for CPC.

Fit and fatigue behavior of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

New computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate glass-ceramics have been marketed. However, information concerning their biomechanical behavior is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the fit and fatigue behavior of two recently introduced CAD-CAM lithium disilicate materials with the standard IPS e.max CAD ceramic and to investigate the effect of the thermal treatment for crystallization on crown fit.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Monolithic crowns (n=15) were milled from 3 CAD-CAM lithium disilicates: IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar AG), Rosetta SM (Hass), and T-lithium (Shenzhen Upcera Dental Technology). Marginal and internal fit were evaluated using the replica technique before and after crystallization, and the fatigue behavior of the luted crowns was evaluated by the step-stress method. One-way ANOVA and the Tukey test were used to compare fit among the materials. Fatigue failure load was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier and Mantel-Cox tests. The effect of crystallization on fit was evaluated with the paired t test (α=.05).

RESULTS

Marginal fit was different between IPS e.max CAD (74 μm) and Rosetta SM (63 μm) (P=.02). T-lithium was similar to the other ceramics (68 μm) (P>.05). Occlusal internal space was similar among all materials (P=.69). Fatigue failure loads of Rosetta SM (1160 N) and T-lithium (1063 N) were similar to IPS e.max CAD (1082 N) (P>.05). The fatigue failure load of Rosetta SM was higher than that of T-lithium (P=.04). Crystallization reduced the axial internal space of all materials (P<.05) without significantly affecting marginal fit (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The fit and fatigue behavior of Rosetta SM and T-lithium were similar to that of IPS e.max CAD. Crystallization reduced the internal space of the crowns.

Marginal fit of monolithic versus layered zirconia crowns assessed with 2 marginal gap methods

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Zirconia can be used either monolithically or veneered with porcelain. However, whether veneering zirconia affects marginal fit is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal fit of the monolithic and layered zirconia prostheses using 2 different assessment methods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An ideal complete crown with a chamfer finish line was prepared on an extracted maxillary central incisor. Two prosthesis designs, a framework and a monolithic design, and 2 marginal fit evaluation methods, the silicone replica and the triple scanning techniques, were used. In the first group, 10 crowns were fabricated with the framework design followed by porcelain veneering, and 10 crowns were fabricated monolithically in the second group. The marginal gap in each group was evaluated with both the silicone replica and triple scan methods. Data were statistically analyzed with a 2-way repeated measures ANOVA (α=.05).

RESULTS

A significant difference was found in the mean marginal gap by design type (P=.003), with the monolithic prostheses having lower mean marginal gaps (31.0 and 84.0 µm). However, both groups showed clinically acceptable marginal fit. No significant difference was found between the assessment methods (P=.092).

CONCLUSIONS

Monolithic zirconia crowns had a better marginal fit than veneered zirconia frameworks. Both the replica and triple scan techniques for marginal gap assessment yielded similar results.

[Effect of polishing method and time on the fitness of CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crown]

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of different polishing methods and time treatment on the fitness of CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns.

METHODS

Sixteen intact maxillary premolars were randomly divided into two groups, group A was treated with silicon carbide burs, while group B was treated with tungsten steel burs. At different polishing time points of the same tooth, digital impressions of each group were obtained, which were used to manufacture CAD/CAM zirconium ceramic crowns. After trial fitting, the gap impressions were obtained by using silicone rubber replication method, and the marginal and internal discrepancies were assessed. The data were statistically analyzed with SPSS 21.0 software package.

RESULTS

The difference between the gap values of the marginal and internal markers of group A and group B was not statistically significant(P＞0.05). Compared with the no-polishing process, the differences of the marginal gap (39.67±8.35) μm and internal gap (45.18±7.16) μm of group A polished for 4 min, and the marginal gap (51.25±14.73) μm, and internal gap (48.56±6.45) μm of group B polished for 3 min, as well as the marginal gap (48.87±8.90) μm, and internal gap (45.99±7.12) μm of group B polished for 4 min, were all significant(P＜0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns treated with silicon carbide bur for polishing 4 min and tungsten steel for 3 min has the best fitness.

Evaluation of the marginal fit of full contoured zirconia, lithium disilicate and metal crowns fabricated using CAD-CAM: An in vitro study

Introduction

The marginal fit of any dental restoration is vital to its long-term success. Lack of adequate fit is potentially detrimental to both the tooth and the supporting periodontal tissues. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal fit of monolithic zirconia, monolithic lithium disilicate and monolithic metal crowns and compare the three groups.

Methods

The study was conducted by fabricating ten samples for each group, total of 30 samples. A premolar stainless steel die was used to standardize the preparation. PVS putty material was used to make impressions of the model and was poured using type IV die stone. The samples were all fabricated using CAD-CAM. The marginal gap was measured by SEM, and the results were analysed using SPSS software.

Results

The mean marginal gap of zirconia, metal and lithium disilicate crowns was 79.49 μm, 46.83 μm and 70.79 μm, respectively.

Discussion

The metal group showed the lowest marginal gap among the groups. This difference in marginal fit is due to the sintering process where the organic binders in soft metal burn out and the metallic powder particles are being sintered (caked) without creating a fused phase.

Clinical Significance

Marginal fit plays a very important role in the long-term success of a crown. Discrepancy in marginal fit results in food and plaque accumulation causing caries and periodontal breakdown, eventuating the failure of the restoration. A perfect marginal fit would enhance the longevity of any indirect restoration. Knowledge about which indirect restoration has the best marginal fit is critical.

Accuracy of single-unit ceramic crown fabrication after digital versus conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In the present era when interest in digital dentistry is increasing, the published literature is still confusing about whether digital impression provides similar accuracy as provided by a conventional impression for the fabrication of a single-unit ceramic crown. The aim of the study was to systematically review the in vivo studies comparing marginal, axial, and occlusal fit of single-unit ceramic crowns fabricated after digital impressions with the ones fabricated after conventional impressions. The PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane online databases were searched for studies comparing the digital impression technique with the conventional technique for single-unit ceramic crowns. Data extraction was done for the year of publication, type of study, country, number of patients, impression system (intraoral scanner [IOS] or conventional impression), marginal fit, axial fit, and occlusal fit. Ten studies were included for meta-analysis regarding the discrepancy in marginal fit, axial fit, and occlusal fit. The digital impression proved to be better than the conventional impression. The mean difference for marginal fit was 6.54 μm (heterogeneity P < 0.00001, I2 = 93%), for axial fit 24.69 μm (heterogeneity P = 0.34, I2 = 11%), and for occlusal fit 6.99 μm (heterogeneity P = 0.03, I2 = 59%). The results of meta-analyses suggest that there is no significant difference between the impression systems (marginally favoring digital impression). The digital impression technique provided better marginal and internal fit of single-unit ceramic crowns than the conventional impression technique. The digital workflow using IOS provided a clinically acceptable marginal fit for single-unit crowns.

Internal Adaptation and Marginal Accuracy of Two Different Techniques-based Poly (ether ether ketone) Single Crowns: An In Vitro Study

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to evaluate how different fabrication techniques affected the marginal accuracy and internal adaptability of poly (ether ether ketone) (PEEK) molar single crowns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty PEEK crowns were constructed using two different fabrication techniques, and they were divided into two main groups (PEEK-CAD and PEEK-pressed). PEEK-CAD crowns were numbered from 1 to 10. PEEK-pressed crowns were numbered from 11 to 20. Each group had 10 PEEK crowns, and both were constructed over a master die. For internal fit measurements, silicone replica bodies were built and cut into two halves buccolingually. Marginal accuracy was measured using three evenly spaced landmarks along the specimen's cervical circumference on each surface using a Leica L2 APO* microscope.

RESULTS

In terms of marginal accuracy, the Press group had a statistically significant greater mean marginal gap value than the computer aided-designing (CAD) group. While in terms of internal fit, there was no statistically significant difference in internal fit between the CAD and Press groups. At a significance level of two-tailed p-value = 0.21 (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PEEK-CAD crowns demonstrated higher marginal accuracy and nearly similar internal fit when compared to PEEK-pressed crowns.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

PEEK material could be used as a substitute for zirconia for a full coverage posterior restoration.

Occlusal contact and clearance of posterior implant-supported single crowns designed by two different methods: a self-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Precise occlusal design of implant-supported fixed prostheses is difficult to achieve by the conventional wax-up method, often requiring chairside adjustments. The computer-aided design (CAD) method is promising. This study aims to compare the occlusal contacts and clearance of posterior implant-supported single crowns designed by the CAD and conventional methods.

METHODS

Sample size calculation indicated fourteen samples per group. Two sets of type-IV plaster casts with a single implant analog inserted in the posterior teeth region were mounted as master casts in a mechanical articulator in maximal intercuspal position (MIP). Seven working cast sets were obtained from each master cast by a closed tray technique, and mounted in MIP. Two implant-supported single crowns were designed with an occlusal clearance to achieve light occlusal contact in each working cast set by CAD and conventional method, separately. For the CAD group, the crown was designed in digital models obtained by scanning the working casts. For the conventional group, wax-up of the crown was prepared on the working casts and scanned to generate a STL file. In the working and master casts, mean and minimum occlusal clearances in the designed occlusal contact area of the both finished prostheses were calculated using the occlusal clearance (OC) and occlusal record (OR) method. The prostheses' occlusion was evaluated in master casts.

RESULTS

For the evaluation in the working casts, both design methods had similar mean occlusal clearances by the OC method (195.4 ± 43.8 vs. 179.8 ± 41.8 μm; P = 0.300), while CAD group resulted in a significantly larger minimum occlusal clearance in the designed occlusal contact area (139.5 ± 52.3 vs. 99.8 ± 43.8 μm; P = 0.043). Both design methods had similar mean and minimum occlusal clearances by the OR method (P > 0.05). For the evaluation in the master casts, both design techniques had similar mean and minimum occlusal clearances, number and distribution of occlusal contacts, and lateral interference ratios (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Occlusal contact and clearance of posterior implant-supported single crowns designed by the CAD method can be at least as good as those designed by the conventional wax-up method.

Comparative Evaluation of Retention and Vertical Marginal Accuracy of Co–Cr Copings Fabricated Using Three Different Techniques: An In Vitro Study

AIM

This study was conducted to comparatively assess the retention and vertical marginal fit of cobalt-chromium copings fabricated by the conventional casting technique, 3D-printed resin pattern, and with direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Out of the total 60 test samples, 20 copings were obtained from inlay-casting wax and 20 from casting of 3D-printed resin patterns. In total, 20 copings were obtained from the laser sintering technique. All 60 test samples were then cemented serially on the prepared maxillary-extracted premolars and were evaluated for vertical marginal gap in 8 pre-established reference areas. Retention was evaluated using a universal testing machine.

RESULTS

Results obtained for both marginal gap and retention were statistically analyzed, and the values fall within the clinically acceptable range. The DMLS technique proved precedence over the other two techniques used, as it exhibited maximum retention and marginal accuracy, which is an area of prime concern.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study encourage further research with different pattern-forming materials and techniques and the need to identify the factors that facilitate better marginal fit and retention of cast restorations.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study has myriad of applications in clinical dentistry mainly in decision-making for casting procedure to provide better retention and marginal accuracy for fabrication of Co-Cr crowns. It also aims to aid the clinician to minimize errors by using different techniques for fabrication of wax pattern as well as the coping, keeping abreast with the recent technology to evaluate the accuracy of 3D-printed resin pattern over conventional wax pattern.

A Critical Review of Dental Lithia-Based Glass-Ceramics

The purpose of this article is to review current understanding of lithia-based glass-ceramics and to identify future research needs for this class of dental materials in relation to novel compositions and fabrication methods. With rapid advances in material development and digital technology, time efficiency of dental workflow and fit accuracy of ceramic restorations are ever improving. Lithia-based glass-ceramics are at the forefront of this advance-new variants with more efficient fabrication routes are continually being introduced into the marketplace. Base glass composition, crystallization heat treatment, nucleant and coloration additives, and property gradation are some pertinent variables. The trend in fabrication is to move from CAD/CAM grinding of partially crystallized glass-ceramics to fully crystallized materials, thereby circumventing the need for postmachining firing altogether. In these endeavors, a better understanding of mechanical properties and evolving shaping technologies, such as ductile grinding, is paramount. Additive manufacturing and 3-dimensional printing methodologies offer a promising alternative to current CAD/CAM subtractive manufacturing routes. Challenges to the implementation of new technologies in efficient development and production of high-quality dental glass-ceramic prostheses are addressed.