Artificial intelligence for caries and periapical periodontitis detection

Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography and panoramic radiography in the detection of apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Apical periodontitis (AP) is one of the most common pathologies of the oral cavity. An early and accurate diagnosis of AP lesions is crucial for proper management and planning of endodontic treatments. This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography (PR) and panoramic radiography (PAN) in the detection of clinically/surgically/histopathologically confirmed AP lesions.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy was limited to English language articles via PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases up to June 30, 2023. Such articles provided diagnostic accuracy values of PR and/or PAN in the detection of AP lesions or alternatively data needed to calculate them.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met inclusion criteria and were considered for the analysis. The average value of diagnostic accuracy in assessing AP lesions was 71% for PR and 66% for PAN. According to different accuracy for specific anatomical areas, it is recommended to use PR in the analysis of AP lesions located in the upper arch and lower incisor area, whereas lower premolar and molar areas may be investigated with the same accuracy with PR or PAN.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-dimensional imaging must be considered the first-level examination for the diagnosis of AP lesions. PR had an overall slightly higher diagnostic accuracy than PAN. Evidence from this review provided a useful tool to support radiologists and dentists in their decision-making when inflammatory periapical bone lesions are suspected to achieve the best clinical outcome for patients, improving the quality of clinical practice.

Applications of artificial intelligence in dentomaxillofacial imaging: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been increasingly developed in oral and maxillofacial imaging. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the applications and performance of the developed algorithms in different dentomaxillofacial imaging modalities.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed. The search strategy was set as a combination of the following keywords: "Artificial Intelligence," "Machine Learning," "Deep Learning," "Neural Networks," "Head and Neck Imaging," and "Maxillofacial Imaging." Full-text screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two independent reviewers; any mismatch was resolved by discussion. The risk of bias was assessed by one reviewer and validated by another.

RESULTS

The search returned a total of 3,392 articles. After careful evaluation of the titles, abstracts, and full texts, a total number of 194 articles were included. Most studies focused on AI applications for tooth and implant classification and identification, 3-dimensional cephalometric landmark detection, lesion detection (periapical, jaws, and bone), and osteoporosis detection.

CONCLUSION

Despite the AI models' limitations, they showed promising results. Further studies are needed to explore specific applications and real-world scenarios before confidently integrating these models into dental practice.

Radiographical diagnostic competences of dental students using various feedback methods and integrating an artificial intelligence application-A randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Radiographic diagnostic competences are a primary focus of dental education. This study assessed two feedback methods to enhance learning outcomes and explored the feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI) to support education.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourth-year dental students had access to 16 virtual radiological example cases for 8 weeks. They were randomly assigned to either elaborated feedback (eF) or knowledge of results feedback (KOR) based on expert consensus. Students´ diagnostic competences were tested on bitewing/periapical radiographs for detection of caries, apical periodontitis, accuracy for all radiological findings and image quality. We additionally assessed the accuracy of an AI system (dentalXrai Pro 3.0), where applicable. Data were analysed descriptively and using ROC analysis (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC). Groups were compared with Welch's t-test.

RESULTS

Among 55 students, the eF group by large performed significantly better than the KOR group in detecting enamel caries (accuracy 0.840 ± 0.041, p = .196; sensitivity 0.638 ± 0.204, p = .037; specificity 0.859 ± 0.050, p = .410; ROC AUC 0.748 ± 0.094, p = .020), apical periodontitis (accuracy 0.813 ± 0.095, p = .011; sensitivity 0.476 ± 0.230, p = .003; specificity 0.914 ± 0.108, p = .292; ROC AUC 0.695 ± 0.123, p = .001) and in assessing the image quality of periapical images (p = .031). No significant differences were observed for the other outcomes. The AI showed almost perfect diagnostic performance (enamel caries: accuracy 0.964, sensitivity 0.857, specificity 0.074; dentin caries: accuracy 0.988, sensitivity 0.941, specificity 1.0; overall: accuracy 0.976, sensitivity 0.958, specificity 0.983).

CONCLUSION

Elaborated feedback can improve student's radiographic diagnostic competences, particularly in detecting enamel caries and apical periodontitis. Using an AI may constitute an alternative to expert labelling of radiographs.

Deep learning method to automatically diagnose periodontal bone loss and periodontitis stage in dental panoramic radiograph

OBJECTIVES

Artificial intelligence (AI) could be used as an automatically diagnosis method for dental disease due to its accuracy and efficiency. This research proposed a novel convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning (DL) ensemble model for tooth position detection, tooth outline segmentation, tooth tissue segmentation, periodontal bone loss and periodontitis stage prediction using dental panoramic radiographs.

METHODS

The dental panoramic radiographs of 320 patients during the period January 2020 to December 2023 were collected in our dataset. All images were de-identified without private information. In total, 8462 teeth were included. The algorithms that DL ensemble model adopted include YOLOv8, Mask R-CNN, and TransUNet. The prediction results of DL method were compared with diagnosis of periodontists.

RESULTS

The periodontal bone loss degree deviation between the DL method and ground truth drawn by the three periodontists was 5.28%. The overall PCC value of the DL method and the periodontists' diagnoses was 0.832 (P <​ 0.001). ​The ICC value was 0.806 (P <​ 0.001). The total diagnostic accuracy of the DL method was 89.45%.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed DL ensemble model in this study shows high accuracy and efficiency in radiographic detection and a valuable adjunct to periodontal diagnosis. The method has strong potential to enhance clinical professional performance and build more efficient dental health services.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The DL method not only could help dentists for rapid and accurate auxiliary diagnosis and prevent medical negligence, but also could be used as a useful learning resource for inexperienced dentists and dental students.

Artificial intelligence in endodontics: Data preparation, clinical applications, ethical considerations, limitations, and future directions

Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative technology in healthcare, including endodontics. A gap in knowledge exists in understanding AI's applications and limitations among endodontic experts. This comprehensive review aims to (A) elaborate on technical and ethical aspects of using data to implement AI models in endodontics; (B) elaborate on evaluation metrics; (C) review the current applications of AI in endodontics; and (D) review the limitations and barriers to real-world implementation of AI in the field of endodontics and its future potentials/directions. The article shows that AI techniques have been applied in endodontics for critical tasks such as detection of radiolucent lesions, analysis of root canal morphology, prediction of treatment outcome and post-operative pain and more. Deep learning models like convolutional neural networks demonstrate high accuracy in these applications. However, challenges remain regarding model interpretability, generalizability, and adoption into clinical practice. When thoughtfully implemented, AI has great potential to aid with diagnostics, treatment planning, clinical interventions, and education in the field of endodontics. However, concerted efforts are still needed to address limitations and to facilitate integration into clinical workflows.

Tooth numbering with polygonal segmentation on periapical radiographs: an artificial intelligence study

OBJECTIVES

Accurately identification and tooth numbering on radiographs is essential for any clinicians. The aim of the present study was to validate the hypothesis that Yolov5, a type of artificial intelligence model, can be trained to detect and number teeth in periapical radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six thousand four hundred forty six anonymized periapical radiographs without motion-related artifacts were randomly selected from the database. All periapical radiographs in which all boundaries of any tooth could be distinguished were included in the study. The radiographic images used were randomly divided into three groups: 80% training, 10% validation, and 10% testing. The confusion matrix was used to examine model success.

RESULTS

During the test phase, 2578 labelings were performed on 644 periapical radiographs. The number of true positive was 2434 (94.4%), false positive was 115 (4.4%), and false negative was 29 (1.2%). The recall, precision, and F1 scores were 0.9882, 0.9548, and 0.9712, respectively. Moreover, the model yielded an area under curve (AUC) of 0.603 on the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed us that YOLOv5 is nearly perfect for numbering teeth on periapical radiography. Although high success rates were achieved as a result of the study, it should not be forgotten that artificial intelligence currently only can be guides dentists for accurate and rapid diagnosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

It is thought that dentists can accelerate the radiographic examination time and inexperienced dentists can reduce the error rate by using YOLOv5. Additionally, YOLOv5 can also be used in the education of dentistry students.

Image-based multi-omics analysis for oral science: Recent progress and perspectives

OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis and treatment of oral and dental diseases rely heavily on various types of medical imaging. Deep learning-mediated multi-omics analysis can extract more representative features than those identified through traditional diagnostic methods. This review aims to discuss the applications and recent advances in image-based multi-omics analysis in oral science and to highlight its potential to enhance traditional diagnostic approaches for oral diseases.

STUDY SELECTION, DATA, AND SOURCES

A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, covering all available records. This search thoroughly examined and summarized advances in image-based multi-omics analysis in oral and maxillofacial medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

This review comprehensively summarizes recent advancements in image-based multi-omics analysis for oral science, including radiomics, pathomics, and photographic-based omics analysis. It also discusses the ongoing challenges and future perspectives that could provide new insights into exploiting the potential of image-based omics analysis in the field of oral science.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This review article presents the state of image-based multi-omics analysis in stomatology, aiming to help oral clinicians recognize the utility of combining omics analyses with imaging during diagnosis and treatment, which can improve diagnostic accuracy, shorten times to diagnosis, save medical resources, and reduce disparity in professional knowledge among clinicians.

Machine learning and deep learning models for the diagnosis of apical periodontitis: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the existing literature on the use of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for diagnosing apical periodontitis (AP) in humans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework. The PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases were searched, focusing on articles using ML/DL approaches for AP diagnosis. No restrictions were applied. Two independent reviewers screened publications and charted data in predefined Excel tables for analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen publications focused on diagnosing AP by identifying periapical radiolucent lesions (PRLs) in dental radiographs were included. The average sensitivity and specificity for reviewed models were 83% and 90%, respectively. Only three studies explored the direct impact of artificial intelligence (AI) assistance on clinicians' diagnostic performance. Both consistently showed improved sensitivity without compromising specificity. Significant variability in dataset sizes, labeling techniques, and algorithm configurations was noticed.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings affirm AI models' effectiveness and transformative potential in diagnosing AP by improving the accurate detection of periapical radiolucencies using dental radiographs. However, the lack of standardized reporting on crucial aspects of methodology and performance metrics prevents establishing a definitive diagnostic approach using AI. Further studies are needed to expand AI applications in AP diagnosis beyond radiographic analysis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

AI can potentially improve diagnostic accuracy in AP diagnosis by enhancing the sensitivity of PRL detection in dental radiographs without compromising specificity.

Automatic feature segmentation in dental panoramic radiographs

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to verify the diagnostic performance of an AI system for the automatic detection of teeth, caries, implants, restorations, and fixed prosthesis on panoramic radiography.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. A dataset comprising 1000 panoramic radiographs collected from 500 adult patients was analyzed by an AI system and compared with annotations provided by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists.

RESULTS

A strong correlation (R > 0.5) was observed between AI perception and observers 1 and 2 in carious teeth (0.691-0.878), implants (0.770-0.952), restored teeth (0.773-0.834), teeth with fixed prostheses (0.972-0.980), and missing teeth (0.956-0.988).

DISCUSSION

Panoramic radiographs are commonly used for diagnosis and treatment planning. However, they often suffer from artifacts, distortions, and superimpositions, leading to potential misinterpretations. Thus, an automated detection system is required to tackle these challenges. Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized various fields, including dentistry, by enabling the development of intelligent systems that can assist in complex tasks such as diagnosis and treatment planning.

CONCLUSION

The automatic detection by the AI system was comparable to oral radiologists and may be useful for automatic identifications in panoramic radiographs. These findings signify the potential for AI systems to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in dental practices, potentially reducing the likelihood of diagnostic errors caused by unexperienced professionals.

Automatic classification and segmentation of multiclass jaw lesions in cone-beam CT using deep learning

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a modified deep learning (DL) model based on nnU-Net for classifying and segmenting five-class jaw lesions using cone-beam CT (CBCT).

METHODS

A total of 368 CBCT scans (37 168 slices) were used to train a multi-class segmentation model. The data underwent manual annotation by two oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) to serve as ground truth. Sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and accuracy were used to evaluate the classification ability of the model and doctors, with or without artificial intelligence assistance. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC), average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), and segmentation time were used to evaluate the segmentation effect of the model.

RESULTS

The model achieved the dual task of classifying and segmenting jaw lesions in CBCT. For classification, the sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of the model were 0.871, 0.974, 0.874, and 0.891, respectively, surpassing oral and maxillofacial radiologists (OMFRs) and OMSs, approaching the specialist. With the model's assistance, the classification performance of OMFRs and OMSs improved, particularly for odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) and ameloblastoma (AM), with F1-score improvements ranging from 6.2% to 12.7%. For segmentation, the DSC was 87.2% and the ASSD was 1.359 mm. The model's average segmentation time was 40 ± 9.9 s, contrasting with 25 ± 7.2 min for OMSs.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed DL model accurately and efficiently classified and segmented five classes of jaw lesions using CBCT. In addition, it could assist doctors in improving classification accuracy and segmentation efficiency, particularly in distinguishing confusing lesions (eg, AM and OKC).

An artificial intelligence grading system of apical periodontitis in cone-beam computed tomography data

OBJECTIVES

In order to assist junior doctors in better diagnosing apical periodontitis (AP), an artificial intelligence AP grading system was developed based on deep learning (DL) and its reliability and accuracy were evaluated.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were selected to construct a classification dataset with four categories, which were divided by CBCT periapical index (CBCTPAI), including normal periapical tissue, CBCTPAI 1-2, CBCTPAI 3-5, and young permanent teeth. Three classic algorithms (ResNet50/101/152) as well as one self-invented algorithm (PAINet) were compared with each other. PAINet were also compared with two recent Transformer-based models and three attention models. Their performance was evaluated by accuracy, precision, recall, balanced F score (F1-score), and the area under the macro-average receiver operating curve (AUC). Reliability was evaluated by Cohen's kappa to compare the consistency of model predicted labels with expert opinions.

RESULTS

PAINet performed best among the four algorithms. The accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC on the test set were 0.9333, 0.9415, 0.9333, 0.9336, and 0.9972, respectively. Cohen's kappa was 0.911, which represented almost perfect consistency.

CONCLUSIONS

PAINet can accurately distinguish between normal periapical tissues, CBCTPAI 1-2, CBCTPAI 3-5, and young permanent teeth. Its results were highly consistent with expert opinions. It can help junior doctors diagnose and score AP, reducing the burden. It can also be promoted in areas where experts are lacking to provide professional diagnostic opinions.

Optimal Training Positive Sample Size Determination for Deep Learning with a Validation on CBCT Image Caries Recognition

Objectives: During deep learning model training, it is essential to consider the balance among the effects of sample size, actual resources, and time constraints. Single-arm objective performance criteria (OPC) was proposed to determine the optimal positive sample size for training deep learning models in caries recognition. Methods: An expected sensitivity (PT) of 0.6 and a clinically acceptable sensitivity (P0) of 0.5 were applied to the single-arm OPC calculation formula, yielding an optimal training set comprising 263 carious teeth. U-Net, YOLOv5n, and CariesDetectNet were trained and validated using clinically self-collected cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images that included varying quantities of carious teeth. To assess performance, an additional dataset was utilized to evaluate the accuracy of caries detection by both the models and two dental radiologists. Results: When the number of carious teeth reached approximately 250, the models reached the optimal performance levels. U-Net demonstrated superior performance, achieving accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-Score, and Dice similarity coefficients of 0.9929, 0.9307, 0.9989, 0.9590, and 0.9435, respectively. The three models exhibited greater accuracy in caries recognition compared to dental radiologists. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the positive sample size of CBCT images containing caries was predictable and could be calculated using single-arm OPC.

Toward Digital Periodontal Health: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives

Periodontal diseases, ranging from gingivitis to periodontitis, are prevalent oral diseases affecting over 50% of the global population. These diseases arise from infections and inflammation of the gums and supporting bones, significantly impacting oral health. The established link between periodontal diseases and systemic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, underscores their importance as a public health concern. Consequently, the early detection and prevention of periodontal diseases have become critical objectives in healthcare, particularly through the integration of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. This paper aims to bridge the gap between clinical practices and cutting-edge technologies by providing a comprehensive review of current research. We examine the identification of causative factors, disease progression, and the role of AI in enhancing early detection and treatment. Our goal is to underscore the importance of early intervention in improving patient outcomes and to stimulate further interest among researchers, bioengineers, and AI specialists in the ongoing exploration of AI applications in periodontal disease diagnosis.

Multi-Quantifying Maxillofacial Traits via a Demographic Parity-Based AI Model

Objective and Impact Statement: The multi-quantification of the distinct individualized maxillofacial traits, that is, quantifying multiple indices, is vital for diagnosis, decision-making, and prognosis of the maxillofacial surgery. Introduction: While the discrete and demographically disproportionate distributions of the multiple indices restrict the generalization ability of artificial intelligence (AI)-based automatic analysis, this study presents a demographic-parity strategy for AI-based multi-quantification. Methods: In the aesthetic-concerning maxillary alveolar basal bone, which requires quantifying a total of 9 indices from length and width dimensional, this study collected a total of 4,000 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) sagittal images, and developed a deep learning model composed of a backbone and multiple regression heads with fully shared parameters to intelligently predict these quantitative metrics. Through auditing of the primary generalization result, the sensitive attribute was identified and the dataset was subdivided to train new submodels. Then, submodels trained from respective subsets were ensembled for final generalization. Results: The primary generalization result showed that the AI model underperformed in quantifying major basal bone indices. The sex factor was proved to be the sensitive attribute. The final model was ensembled by the male and female submodels, which yielded equal performance between genders, low error, high consistency, satisfying correlation coefficient, and highly focused attention. The ensemble model exhibited high similarity to clinicians with minor processing time. Conclusion: This work validates that the demographic parity strategy enables the AI algorithm with greater model generalization ability, even for the highly variable traits, which benefits for the appearance-concerning maxillofacial surgery.

Artificial intelligence for detecting periapical radiolucencies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Dentists' diagnostic accuracy in detecting periapical radiolucency varies considerably. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting periapical radiolucency.

DATA

Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy and utilizing AI for periapical radiolucency detection, published until November 2023, were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis was conducted using the online MetaDTA Tool to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity. Risk of bias was evaluated using QUADAS-2.

SOURCES

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore databases. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy and utilizing AI tools for periapical radiolucency detection, published until November 2023, were eligible for inclusion.

STUDY SELECTION

We identified 210 articles, of which 24 met the criteria for inclusion in the review. All but one study used one type of convolutional neural network. The body of evidence comes with an overall unclear to high risk of bias and several applicability concerns. Four of the twenty-four studies were included in a meta-analysis. AI showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.94 (95 % CI = 0.90-0.96) and 0.96 (95 % CI = 0.91-0.98), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AI demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity for detecting periapical radiolucencies. However, the current landscape suggests a need for diverse study designs beyond traditional diagnostic accuracy studies. Prospective real-life randomized controlled trials using heterogeneous data are needed to demonstrate the true value of AI.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Artificial intelligence tools seem to have the potential to support detecting periapical radiolucencies on imagery. Notably, nearly all studies did not test fully fledged software systems but measured the mere accuracy of AI models in diagnostic accuracy studies. The true value of currently available AI-based software for lesion detection on both 2D and 3D radiographs remains uncertain.

A Systematic Review on Caries Detection, Classification, and Segmentation from X-Ray Images: Methods, Datasets, Evaluation, and Open Opportunities

Dental caries occurs from the interaction between oral bacteria and sugars, generating acids that damage teeth over time. The importance of X-ray images for detecting oral problems is undeniable in dentistry. With technological advances, it is feasible to identify these lesions using techniques such as deep learning, machine learning, and image processing. Therefore, the survey and systematization of these methods are essential to determining the main computational approaches for identifying caries in X-ray images. In this systematic review, we investigated the primary computational methods used for classifying, detecting, and segmenting caries in X-ray images. Following the PRISMA methodology, we selected relevant studies and analyzed their methods, strengths, limitations, imaging modalities, evaluation metrics, datasets, and classification techniques. The review encompassed 42 studies retrieved from the Science Direct, IEEExplore, ACM Digital, and PubMed databases from the Computer Science and Health areas. The results indicate that 12% of the included articles utilized public datasets, with deep learning being the predominant approach, accounting for 69% of the studies. The majority of these studies (76%) focused on classifying dental caries, either in binary or multiclass classification. Panoramic imaging was the most commonly used radiographic modality, representing 29% of the cases studied. Overall, our systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the computational methods employed in identifying caries in radiographic images and highlights trends, patterns, and challenges in this research field.

Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy for Dental Caries and Anomalies in Panoramic Radiographs Using a Custom Deep Learning Model

Background  Dental caries is one of the most prevalent conditions in dentistry worldwide. Early identification and classification of dental caries are essential for effective prevention and treatment. Panoramic dental radiographs are commonly used to screen for overall oral health, including dental caries and tooth anomalies. However, manual interpretation of these radiographs can be time-consuming and prone to human error. Therefore, an automated classification system could help streamline diagnostic workflows and provide timely insights for clinicians. Methods This article presents a deep learning-based, custom-built model for the binary classification of panoramic dental radiographs. The use of histogram equalization and filtering methods as preprocessing techniques effectively addresses issues related to irregular illumination and contrast in dental radiographs, enhancing overall image quality. By incorporating three separate panoramic dental radiograph datasets, the model benefits from a diverse dataset that improves its training and evaluation process across a wide range of caries and abnormalities. Results The dental radiograph analysis model is designed for binary classification to detect the presence of dental caries, restorations, and periapical region abnormalities, achieving accuracies of 97.01%, 81.63%, and 77.53%, respectively. Conclusions The proposed algorithm extracts discriminative features from dental radiographs, detecting subtle patterns indicative of tooth caries, restorations, and region-based abnormalities. Automating this classification could assist dentists in the early detection of caries and anomalies, aid in treatment planning, and enhance the monitoring of dental diseases, ultimately improving and promoting patients' oral healthcare.

Applications and performance of artificial intelligence models in removable prosthodontics: A literature review

PURPOSE

In this narrative review, we present the current applications and performances of artificial intelligence (AI) models in different phases of the removable prosthodontic workflow and related research topics.

STUDY SELECTION

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases between January 2010 and January 2023. Search terms related to AI were combined with terms related to removable prosthodontics. Articles reporting the structure and performance of the developed AI model were selected for this literature review.

RESULTS

A total of 15 articles were relevant to the application of AI in removable prosthodontics, including maxillofacial prosthetics. These applications included the design of removable partial dentures, classification of partially edentulous arches, functional evaluation and outcome prediction in complete denture treatment, early prosthetic management of patients with cleft lip and palate, coloration of maxillofacial prostheses, and prediction of the material properties of denture teeth. Various AI models with reliable prediction accuracy have been developed using supervised learning.

CONCLUSIONS

The current applications of AI in removable prosthodontics exhibit significant potential for improving the prosthodontic workflow, with high accuracy levels reported in most of the reviewed studies. However, the focus has been predominantly on the diagnostic phase, with few studies addressing treatment planning and implementation. Because the number of AI-related studies in removable prosthodontics is limited, more models targeting different prosthodontic disciplines are required.

Artificial intelligence in dentistry: A bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2023

Background/purpose

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping clinical practice in dentistry. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of global trends and research hotspots on the application of AI to dentistry.

Materials and methods

Studies on AI in dentistry published between 2000 and 2023 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric parameters were extracted and bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer, Pajek, and CiteSpace software.

Results

A total of 651 publications were identified, 88.7 % of which were published after 2019. Publications originating from the United States and China accounted for 34.5 % of the total. The Charité Medical University of Berlin was the institution with the highest number of publications, and Schwendicke and Krois were the most active authors in the field. The Journal of Dentistry had the highest citation count. The focus of AI in dentistry primarily centered on the analysis of imaging data and the dental diseases most frequently associated with AI were periodontitis, bone fractures, and dental caries. The dental AI applications most frequently discussed since 2019 included neural networks, medical devices, clinical decision support systems, head and neck cancer, support vector machine, geometric deep learning, and precision medicine.

Conclusion

Research on AI in dentistry is experiencing explosive growth. The prevailing research emphasis and anticipated future development involve the establishment of medical devices and clinical decision support systems based on innovative AI algorithms to advance precision dentistry. This study provides dentists with valuable insights into this field.

Artificial intelligence vs. semi-automated segmentation for assessment of dental periapical lesion volume index score: A cone-beam CT study

INTRODUCTION

Cone beam computed tomography periapical volume index (CBCTPAVI) is a categorisation tool to assess periapical lesion size in three-dimensions and predict treatment outcomes. This index was determined using a time-consuming semi-automatic segmentation technique. This study compared artificial intelligence (AI) with semi-automated segmentation to determine AI's ability to accurately determine CBCTPAVI score.

METHODS

CBCTPAVI scores for 500 tooth roots were determined using both the semi-automatic segmentation technique in three-dimensional imaging analysis software (Mimics Research™) and AI (Diagnocat™). A confusion matrix was created to compare the CBCTPAVI score by the AI with the semi-automatic segmentation technique. Evaluation metrics, precision, recall, F1-score (2×precision×recallprecision+recall), and overall accuracy were determined.

RESULTS

In 84.4 % (n = 422) of cases the AI classified CBCTPAVI score the same as the semi-automated technique. AI was unable to classify any lesion as index 1 or 2, due to its limitation in small volume measurement. When lesions classified as index 1 and 2 by the semi-automatic segmentation technique were excluded, the AI demonstrated levels of precision, recall and F1-score, all above 0.85, for indices 0, 3-6; and accuracy over 90 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnocat™ with its ability to determine CBCTPAVI score in approximately 2 min following upload of the CBCT could be an excellent and efficient tool to facilitate better monitoring and assessment of periapical lesions in everyday clinical practice and/or radiographic reporting. However, to assess three-dimensional healing of smaller lesions (with scores 1 and 2), further advancements in AI technologies are needed.

Construction of dental pulp decellularized matrix by cyclic lavation combined with mechanical stirring and its proteomic analysis

The decellularized matrix has a great potential for tissue remodeling and regeneration; however, decellularization could induce host immune rejection due to incomplete cell removal or detergent residues, thereby posing significant challenges for its clinical application. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate detergent concentration, further optimization of tissue decellularization technique, increased of biosafety in decellularized tissues, and reduction of tissue damage during the decellularization procedures are pivotal issues that need to be investigated. In this study, we tested several conditions and determined that 0.1% Sodium dodecyl sulfate and three decellularization cycles were the optimal conditions for decellularization of pulp tissue. Decellularization efficiency was calculated and the preparation protocol for dental pulp decellularization matrix (DPDM) was further optimized. To characterize the optimized DPDM, the microstructure, odontogenesis-related protein and fiber content were evaluated. Our results showed that the properties of optimized DPDM were superior to those of the non-optimized matrix. We also performed the 4D-Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of DPDM and demonstrated the preservation of proteins from the natural pulp. This study provides a optimized protocol for the potential application of DPDM in pulp regeneration.

Periapical Lesions in Panoramic Radiography and CBCT Imaging-Assessment of AI's Diagnostic Accuracy

Background/Objectives: Periapical lesions (PLs) are frequently detected in dental radiology. Accurate diagnosis of these lesions is essential for proper treatment planning. Imaging techniques such as orthopantomogram (OPG) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging are used to identify PLs. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) software Diagnocat for PL detection in OPG and CBCT images. Methods: The study included 49 patients, totaling 1223 teeth. Both OPG and CBCT images were analyzed by AI software and by three experienced clinicians. All the images were obtained in one patient cohort, and findings were compared to the consensus of human readers using CBCT. The AI's diagnostic accuracy was compared to a reference method, calculating sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. Results: The AI's sensitivity for OPG images was 33.33% with an F1 score of 32.73%. For CBCT images, the AI's sensitivity was 77.78% with an F1 score of 84.00%. The AI's specificity was over 98% for both OPG and CBCT images. Conclusions: The AI demonstrated high sensitivity and high specificity in detecting PLs in CBCT images but lower sensitivity in OPG images.

Application of artificial intelligence in dental implant prognosis: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this scoping review was to evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in the prognosis of dental implants.

DATA

Studies that analyzed the performance of AI models in the prediction of implant prognosis based on medical records or radiographic images. Quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies.

SOURCES

This scoping review included studies published in English up to October 2023 in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. A manual search was also performed.

STUDY SELECTION

Of 892 studies, full-text analysis was conducted in 36 studies. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight used deep learning models, 3 applied traditional machine learning algorithms, and 1 study combined both types. The performance was quantified using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1 score, and receiver operating characteristic area under curves (ROC AUC). The prognostic accuracy was analyzed and ranged from 70 % to 96.13 %.

CONCLUSIONS

AI is a promising tool in evaluating implant prognosis, but further enhancements are required. Additional radiographic and clinical data are needed to improve AI performance in implant prognosis.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

AI can predict the prognosis of dental implants based on radiographic images or medical records. As a result, clinicians can receive predicted implant prognosis with the assistance of AI before implant placement and make informed decisions.

Perceptions and attitudes of dental students and dentists in South Korea toward artificial intelligence: a subgroup analysis based on professional seniority

BACKGROUND

This study explored dental students' and dentists' perceptions and attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and analyzed differences according to professional seniority.

METHODS

In September to November 2022, online surveys using Google Forms were conducted at 2 dental colleges and on 2 dental websites. The questionnaire consisted of general information (8 or 10 items) and participants' perceptions, confidence, predictions, and perceived future prospects regarding AI (17 items). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on 4 questions representing perceptions and attitudes toward AI to identify highly influential factors according to position, age, sex, residence, and self-reported knowledge level about AI of respondents. Participants were reclassified into 2 subgroups based on students' years in school and 4 subgroups based on dentists' years of experience. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to determine differences between dental students and dentists and between subgroups for all 17 questions.

RESULTS

The study included 120 dental students and 96 dentists. Participants with high level of AI knowledge were more likely to be interested in AI compared to those with moderate or low level (adjusted OR 24.345, p < 0.001). Most dental students (60.8%) and dentists (67.7%) predicted that dental AI would complement human limitations. Dental students responded that they would actively use AI in almost all cases (40.8%), while dentists responded that they would use AI only when necessary (44.8%). Dentists with 11-20 years of experience were the most likely to disagree that AI could outperform skilled dentists (50.0%), and respondents with longer careers had higher response rates regarding the need for AI education in schools.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge level about AI emerged as the factor influencing perceptions and attitudes toward AI, with both dental students and dentists showing similar views on recognizing the potential of AI as an auxiliary tool. However, students' and dentists' willingness to use AI differed. Although dentists differed in their confidence in the abilities of AI, all dentists recognized the need for education on AI. AI adoption is becoming a reality in dentistry, which requires proper awareness, proper use, and comprehensive AI education.

Artificial intelligence for radiographic imaging detection of caries lesions: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models designed for the detection of caries lesion (CL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, LILACS and Embase databases for retrospective, prospective and cross-sectional studies published until January 2023, using the following keywords: artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), artificial neural networks (ANN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN), radiology, detection, diagnosis and dental caries (DC). The quality assessment was performed using the guidelines of QUADAS-2.

RESULTS

Twenty articles that met the selection criteria were evaluated. Five studies were performed on periapical radiographs, nine on bitewings, and six on orthopantomography. The number of imaging examinations included ranged from 15 to 2900. Four studies investigated ANN models, fifteen CNN models, and two DCNN models. Twelve were retrospective studies, six cross-sectional and two prospective. The following diagnostic performance was achieved in detecting CL: sensitivity from 0.44 to 0.86, specificity from 0.85 to 0.98, precision from 0.50 to 0.94, PPV (Positive Predictive Value) 0.86, NPV (Negative Predictive Value) 0.95, accuracy from 0.73 to 0.98, area under the curve (AUC) from 0.84 to 0.98, intersection over union of 0.3-0.4 and 0.78, Dice coefficient 0.66 and 0.88, F1-score from 0.64 to 0.92. According to the QUADAS-2 evaluation, most studies exhibited a low risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

AI-based models have demonstrated good diagnostic performance, potentially being an important aid in CL detection. Some limitations of these studies are related to the size and heterogeneity of the datasets. Future studies need to rely on comparable, large, and clinically meaningful datasets.

PROTOCOL

PROSPERO identifier: CRD42023470708.

Exploring the Methodological Approaches of Studies on Radiographic Databases Used in Cariology to Feed Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

A growing number of studies on diagnostic imaging show superior efficiency and accuracy of computer-aided diagnostic systems compared to those of certified dentists. This methodological systematic review aimed to evaluate the different methodological approaches used by studies focusing on machine learning and deep learning that have used radiographic databases to classify, detect, and segment dental caries.

METHODS

The protocol was registered in PROSPERO before data collection (CRD42022348097). Literature research was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science until December 2022, without language restrictions. Studies and surveys using a dental radiographic database for the classification, detection, or segmentation of carious lesions were sought. Records deemed eligible were retrieved and further assessed for inclusion by two reviewers who resolved any discrepancies through consensus. A third reviewer was consulted when any disagreements or discrepancies persisted between the two reviewers. After data extraction, the same reviewers assessed the methodological quality using the CLAIM and QUADAS-AI checklists.

RESULTS

After screening 325 articles, 35 studies were eligible and included. The bitewing was the most commonly used radiograph (n = 17) at the time when detection (n = 15) was the most explored computer vision task. The sample sizes used ranged from 95 to 38,437, while the augmented training set ranged from 300 to 315,786. Convolutional neural network was the most commonly used model. The mean completeness of CLAIM items was 49% (SD ± 34%). The applicability of the CLAIM checklist items revealed several weaknesses in the methodology of the selected studies: most of the studies were monocentric, and only 9% of them used an external test set when evaluating the model's performance. The QUADAS-AI tool revealed that only 43% of the studies included in this systematic review were at low risk of bias concerning the standard reference domain.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrates that the overall scientific quality of studies conducted to feed artificial intelligence algorithms is low. Some improvement in the design and validation of studies can be made with the development of a standardized guideline for the reproducibility and generalizability of results and, thus, their clinical applications.

AI in Orthodontics: Revolutionizing Diagnostics and Treatment Planning-A Comprehensive Review

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has transformed various medical specialties, including orthodontics. AI has shown promising results in enhancing the accuracy of diagnoses, treatment planning, and predicting treatment outcomes. Its usage in orthodontic practices worldwide has increased with the availability of various AI applications and tools. This review explores the principles of AI, its applications in orthodontics, and its implementation in clinical practice. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on AI applications in dental diagnostics, cephalometric evaluation, skeletal age determination, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) evaluation, decision making, and patient telemonitoring. Due to study heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was possible. AI has demonstrated high efficacy in all these areas, but variations in performance and the need for manual supervision suggest caution in clinical settings. The complexity and unpredictability of AI algorithms call for cautious implementation and regular manual validation. Continuous AI learning, proper governance, and addressing privacy and ethical concerns are crucial for successful integration into orthodontic practice.

Rapid detection of non-normal teeth on dental X-ray images using improved Mask R-CNN with attention mechanism

PURPOSE

Dental health has been getting increased attention. Timely detection of non-normal teeth (caries, residual root, retainer, teeth filling, etc.) is of great importance for people's health, well-being, and quality of life. This work proposes a rapid detection of non-normal teeth based on improved Mask R-CNN, aiming to achieve comprehensive screening of non-normal teeth on dental X-ray images.

METHODS

An improved Mask R-CNN based on attention mechanism was used to develop a non-normal teeth detection method trained on a high-quality annotated dataset, which can segment the whole mask of each non-normal tooth on the dental X-ray image immediately.

RESULTS

The average precision (AP) of the proposed non-normal teeth detection was 0.795 with an intersection-over-union of 0.5 and max detections (maxDets) of 32, which was higher than that of the typical Mask R-CNN method (AP = 0.750). In addition, validation experiments showed that the evaluation metrics (AP, recall, precision-recall (P-R) curve) of the proposed method were superior to those of the Mask R-CNN method. Furthermore, the experimental results indicated that proposed method exhibited a high sensitivity (95.65%) in detecting secondary caries. The proposed method took about 0.12 s to segment non-normal teeth on one dental X-ray image using the laptop (8G memory, NVIDIA RTX 3060 graphics processing unit), which was much faster than conventional manual methods.

CONCLUSION

The proposed method enhances the accuracy and efficiency of abnormal tooth diagnosis for practitioners, while also facilitating early detection and treatment of dental caries to substantially lower patient costs. Additionally, it can enable rapid and objective evaluation of student performance in dental examinations.

Applying artificial intelligence to detect and analyse oral and maxillofacial bone loss-A scoping review

Radiographic evaluation of bone changes is one of the main tools in the diagnosis of many oral and maxillofacial diseases. However, this approach to assessment has limitations in accuracy, inconsistency and comparatively low diagnostic efficiency. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms like deep learning networks have been introduced as a solution to overcome these challenges. Based on recent studies, AI can improve the detection accuracy of an expert clinician for periapical pathology, periodontal diseases and their prognostication, as well as peri-implant bone loss. Also, AI has been successfully used to detect and diagnose oral and maxillofacial lesions with a high predictive value. This study aims to review the current evidence on artificial intelligence applications in the detection and analysis of bone loss in the oral and maxillofacial regions.

Current Progress and Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Dentistry-A Narrative Review

The concept of machines learning and acting like humans is what is meant by the phrase "artificial intelligence" (AI). Several branches of dentistry are increasingly relying on artificial intelligence (AI) tools. The literature usually focuses on AI models. These AI models have been used to detect and diagnose a wide range of conditions, including, but not limited to, dental caries, vertical root fractures, apical lesions, diseases of the salivary glands, maxillary sinusitis, maxillofacial cysts, cervical lymph node metastasis, osteoporosis, cancerous lesions, alveolar bone loss, the need for orthodontic extractions or treatments, cephalometric analysis, age and gender determination, and more. The primary contemporary applications of AI in the dental field are in undergraduate teaching and research. Before these methods can be used in everyday dentistry, however, the underlying technology and user interfaces need to be refined.

Prediction of pulp exposure before caries excavation using artificial intelligence: Deep learning-based image data versus standard dental radiographs

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to examine the effect of giving Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based radiographic information versus standard radiographic and clinical information to dental students on their pulp exposure prediction ability.

METHODS

292 preoperative bitewing radiographs from patients previously treated were used. A multi-path neural network was implemented. The first path was a convolutional neural network (CNN) based on ResNet-50 architecture. The second path was a neural network trained on the distance between the pulp and lesion extracted from X-ray segmentations. Both paths merged and were followed by fully connected layers that predicted the probability of pulp exposure. A trial concerning the prediction of pulp exposure based on radiographic input and information on age and pain was conducted, involving 25 dental students. The data displayed was divided into 4 groups (G): GX-ray, GX-ray+clinical data, GX-ray+AI, GX-ray+clinical data+AI.

RESULTS

The results showed that AI surpassed the performance of students in all groups with an F1-score of 0.71 (P < 0.001). The students' F1-score in GX-ray+AI and GX-ray+clinical data+AI with model prediction (0.61 and 0.61 respectively) was slightly higher than the F1-score in GX-ray and GX-ray+clinical data (0.58 and 0.59 respectively) with a borderline statistical significance of P = 0.054.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the AI model had much better performance than all groups, the participants when given AI prediction, benefited only 'slightly'. AI technology seems promising, but more explainable AI predictions along with a 'learning curve' are warranted.

Acceptance and Usability of an Innovative mDentistry eHygiene Model Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic Within the US National Dental Practice-Based Research Network: Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Amid the COVID-19 pandemic and other possible future infectious disease pandemics, dentistry needs to consider modified dental examination regimens that render quality care and ensure the safety of patients and dental health care personnel (DHCP).

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the acceptance and usability of an innovative mDentistry eHygiene model amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

This pilot study used a 2-stage implementation design to assess 2 critical components of an innovative mDentistry eHygiene model: virtual hygiene examination (eHygiene) and patient self-taken intraoral images (SELFIE), within the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) were used to assess the acceptance and usability of the eHygiene model.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients and 18 DHCP participated in the study. Overall, the eHygiene model was well accepted by patients (System Usability Scale [SUS] score: mean 70.0, SD 23.7) and moderately accepted by dentists (SUS score: mean 51.3, SD 15.9) and hygienists (SUS score: mean 57.1, SD 23.8). Dentists and patients had good communication during the eHygiene examination, as assessed using the Dentist-Patient Communication scale. In the SELFIE session, patients completed tasks with minimum challenges and obtained diagnostic intraoral photos. Patients and DHCP suggested that although eHygiene has the potential to improve oral health care services, it should be used selectively depending on patients' conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results showed promise for the 2 components of the eHygiene model. eHygiene offers a complementary modality for oral health data collection and examination in dental offices, which would be particularly useful during an infectious disease outbreak. In addition, patients being able to capture critical oral health data in their home could facilitate dental treatment triage and oral health self-monitoring and potentially trigger oral health-promoting behaviors.

Deep Learning-Based Recognition of Periodontitis and Dental Caries in Dental X-ray Images

Dental X-ray images are important and useful for dentists to diagnose dental diseases. Utilizing deep learning in dental X-ray images can help dentists quickly and accurately identify common dental diseases such as periodontitis and dental caries. This paper applies image processing and deep learning technologies to dental X-ray images to propose a simultaneous recognition method for periodontitis and dental caries. The single-tooth X-ray image is detected by the YOLOv7 object detection technique and cropped from the periapical X-ray image. Then, it is processed through contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization to enhance the local contrast, and bilateral filtering to eliminate noise while preserving the edge. The deep learning architecture for classification comprises a pre-trained EfficientNet-B0 and fully connected layers that output two labels by the sigmoid activation function for the classification task. The average precision of tooth detection using YOLOv7 is 97.1%. For the recognition of periodontitis, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is 98.67%, and the AUC of the precision-recall (PR) curve is 98.38%. For the recognition of dental caries, the AUC of the ROC curve is 98.31%, and the AUC of the PR curve is 97.55%. Different from the conventional deep learning-based methods for a single disease such as periodontitis or dental caries, the proposed approach can provide the recognition of both periodontitis and dental caries simultaneously. This recognition method presents good performance in the identification of periodontitis and dental caries, thus facilitating dental diagnosis.

Deep Learning in Diagnosis of Dental Anomalies and Diseases: A Systematic Review

Deep learning and diagnostic applications in oral and dental health have received significant attention recently. In this review, studies applying deep learning to diagnose anomalies and diseases in dental image material were systematically compiled, and their datasets, methodologies, test processes, explainable artificial intelligence methods, and findings were analyzed. Tests and results in studies involving human-artificial intelligence comparisons are discussed in detail to draw attention to the clinical importance of deep learning. In addition, the review critically evaluates the literature to guide and further develop future studies in this field. An extensive literature search was conducted for the 2019-May 2023 range using the Medline (PubMed) and Google Scholar databases to identify eligible articles, and 101 studies were shortlisted, including applications for diagnosing dental anomalies (n = 22) and diseases (n = 79) using deep learning for classification, object detection, and segmentation tasks. According to the results, the most commonly used task type was classification (n = 51), the most commonly used dental image material was panoramic radiographs (n = 55), and the most frequently used performance metric was sensitivity/recall/true positive rate (n = 87) and accuracy (n = 69). Dataset sizes ranged from 60 to 12,179 images. Although deep learning algorithms are used as individual or at least individualized architectures, standardized architectures such as pre-trained CNNs, Faster R-CNN, YOLO, and U-Net have been used in most studies. Few studies have used the explainable AI method (n = 22) and applied tests comparing human and artificial intelligence (n = 21). Deep learning is promising for better diagnosis and treatment planning in dentistry based on the high-performance results reported by the studies. For all that, their safety should be demonstrated using a more reproducible and comparable methodology, including tests with information about their clinical applicability, by defining a standard set of tests and performance metrics.

A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Dentistry E-Health

Artificial intelligence has made substantial progress in medicine. Automated dental imaging interpretation is one of the most prolific areas of research using AI. X-ray and infrared imaging systems have enabled dental clinicians to identify dental diseases since the 1950s. However, the manual process of dental disease assessment is tedious and error-prone when diagnosed by inexperienced dentists. Thus, researchers have employed different advanced computer vision techniques, and machine- and deep-learning models for dental disease diagnoses using X-ray and near-infrared imagery. Despite the notable development of AI in dentistry, certain factors affect the performance of the proposed approaches, including limited data availability, imbalanced classes, and lack of transparency and interpretability. Hence, it is of utmost importance for the research community to formulate suitable approaches, considering the existing challenges and leveraging findings from the existing studies. Based on an extensive literature review, this survey provides a brief overview of X-ray and near-infrared imaging systems. Additionally, a comprehensive insight into challenges faced by researchers in the dental domain has been brought forth in this survey. The article further offers an amalgamative assessment of both performances and methods evaluated on public benchmarks and concludes with ethical considerations and future research avenues.

Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Periapical Periodontitis on Two-Dimensional Radiographs: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting apical pathosis on periapical radiographs. A total of twenty anonymized periapical radiographs were retrieved from the database of Poznan University of Medical Sciences. These radiographs displayed a sequence of 60 visible teeth. The evaluation of the radiographs was conducted using two methods (manual and automatic), and the results obtained from each technique were afterward compared. For the ground-truth method, one oral and maxillofacial radiology expert with more than ten years of experience and one trainee in oral and maxillofacial radiology evaluated the radiographs by classifying teeth as healthy and unhealthy. A tooth was considered unhealthy when periapical periodontitis related to this tooth had been detected on the radiograph. At the same time, a tooth was classified as healthy when no periapical radiolucency was detected on the periapical radiographs. Then, the same radiographs were evaluated by artificial intelligence, Diagnocat (Diagnocat Ltd., San Francisco, CA, USA). Diagnocat (Diagnocat Ltd., San Francisco, CA, USA) correctly identified periapical lesions on periapical radiographs with a sensitivity of 92.30% and identified healthy teeth with a specificity of 97.87%. The recorded accuracy and F1 score were 96.66% and 0.92, respectively. The artificial intelligence algorithm misdiagnosed one unhealthy tooth (false negative) and over-diagnosed one healthy tooth (false positive) compared to the ground-truth results. Diagnocat (Diagnocat Ltd., San Francisco, CA, USA) showed an optimum accuracy for detecting periapical periodontitis on periapical radiographs. However, more research is needed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-based algorithms in dentistry.

Deep Learning for Detection of Periapical Radiolucent Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the overall accuracy of deep learning models in detecting periapical (PA) radiolucent lesions in dental radiographs, when compared to expert clinicians.

METHODS

Electronic databases of Medline (via PubMed), Embase (via Ovid), Scopus, Google Scholar, and arXiv were searched. Quality of eligible studies was assessed by using Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Tool-2. Quantitative analyses were conducted using hierarchical logistic regression for meta-analyses on diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analyses on different image modalities (PA radiographs, panoramic radiographs, and cone beam computed tomographic images) and on different deep learning tasks (classification, segmentation, object detection) were conducted. Certainty of evidence was assessed by using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.

RESULTS

A total of 932 studies were screened. Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review, out of which 6 studies were selected for quantitative analyses. Six studies had low risk of bias. Twelve studies had risk of bias. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of included studies (all image modalities; all tasks) were 0.925 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.862-0.960), 0.852 (95% CI, 0.810-0.885), 6.261 (95% CI, 4.717-8.311), 0.087 (95% CI, 0.045-0.168), and 71.692 (95% CI, 29.957-171.565), respectively. No publication bias was detected (Egger's test, P = .82). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluationshowed a "high" certainty of evidence for the studies included in the meta-analyses.

CONCLUSION

Compared to expert clinicians, deep learning showed highly accurate results in detecting PA radiolucent lesions in dental radiographs. Most studies had risk of bias. There was a lack of prospective studies.

Artificial Intelligence in Periodontology: A Scoping Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the development of computer systems whereby machines can mimic human actions. This is increasingly used as an assistive tool to help clinicians diagnose and treat diseases. Periodontitis is one of the most common diseases worldwide, causing the destruction and loss of the supporting tissues of the teeth. This study aims to assess current literature describing the effect AI has on the diagnosis and epidemiology of this disease. Extensive searches were performed in April 2022, including studies where AI was employed as the independent variable in the assessment, diagnosis, or treatment of patients with periodontitis. A total of 401 articles were identified for abstract screening after duplicates were removed. In total, 293 texts were excluded, leaving 108 for full-text assessment with 50 included for final synthesis. A broad selection of articles was included, with the majority using visual imaging as the input data field, where the mean number of utilised images was 1666 (median 499). There has been a marked increase in the number of studies published in this field over the last decade. However, reporting outcomes remains heterogeneous because of the variety of statistical tests available for analysis. Efforts should be made to standardise methodologies and reporting in order to ensure that meaningful comparisons can be drawn.

Automatic Feature Segmentation in Dental Periapical Radiographs

While a large number of archived digital images make it easy for radiology to provide data for Artificial Intelligence (AI) evaluation; AI algorithms are more and more applied in detecting diseases. The aim of the study is to perform a diagnostic evaluation on periapical radiographs with an AI model based on Convoluted Neural Networks (CNNs). The dataset includes 1169 adult periapical radiographs, which were labelled in CranioCatch annotation software. Deep learning was performed using the U-Net model implemented with the PyTorch library. The AI models based on deep learning models improved the success rate of carious lesion, crown, dental pulp, dental filling, periapical lesion, and root canal filling segmentation in periapical images. Sensitivity, precision and F1 scores for carious lesion were 0.82, 0.82, and 0.82, respectively; sensitivity, precision and F1 score for crown were 1, 1, and 1, respectively; sensitivity, precision and F1 score for dental pulp, were 0.97, 0.87 and 0.92, respectively; sensitivity, precision and F1 score for filling were 0.95, 0.95, and 0.95, respectively; sensitivity, precision and F1 score for the periapical lesion were 0.92, 0.85, and 0.88, respectively; sensitivity, precision and F1 score for root canal filling, were found to be 1, 0.96, and 0.98, respectively. The success of AI algorithms in evaluating periapical radiographs is encouraging and promising for their use in routine clinical processes as a clinical decision support system.

Digital photometric analysis of gingival response to periodontal treatment

OBJECTIVES

The color is a major factor in determining inflammation status in most gingival indices. Current indices have limitations mainly due to subjective nature. Digital color analysis can provide objective and accurate measurements. Thus, the present study aimed to assess by digital tool the gingival color in the different stages of an active periodontal treatment.

METHODS

Forty patients (19 males and 21 females) diagnosed with periodontitis (stage III/ IV, grade C) and treated surgically were included in the study. Clinical data (probing depth, bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level, gingival index, and gingival recession) and photographs by digital single-lens-reflex (DSLR) camera were recorded before initial periodontal treatment, which included scaling and root surface debridement (T0); the same parameters were then re-evaluated 6-8 weeks (T1) and 3 months after periodontal surgery (regenerative/resective) (T2). Differences between clinical parameters were calculated. The color space defined by the International Commission on Illumination (CIELab) was used to analyze gingival color.

RESULTS

In 56 periodontal surgical sites, 168 photographs were taken. The a*-value of the CIELab color system (higher a*- value translate to a stronger red color) was significantly reduced between T0 to T1 and further decreased at T2 (32.01, 29.28, and 27.45 respectively). Significant improvement in clinical parameters were found between T0 to T1 and T1 to T2. Sub-analysis of two distinct surgical interventions revealed that only regenerative procedure improved the a*-value, which was significantly correlated with pocket depth reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Photometric analysis can be used to assess gingival color change during periodontal treatment of patients with periodontitis.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Gingival inflammation is a major factor in periodontal assessment; nevertheless, all current gingival inflammation indices are partially subjective and only semi-quantitative. The digital photometric analysis may allow for accurate and objective gingival color assessment during periodontal treatment.

Accuracy of RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetric facial scanners: a comparative study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy and inter-operator reliability of a low-cost red-green-blue-depth (RGB-D) camera-based facial scanner (Bellus3D Arc7) with a stereophotogrammetry facial scanner (3dMD) and to explore the possibility of the former as a clinical substitute for the latter.

METHODS

A mannequin head was selected as the research object. In the RGB-D camera-based facial scanner group, the head was continuously scanned five times using an RGB-D camera-based facial scanner (Bellus3D Arc7), and the outcome data of each scan was then imported into CAD software (MeshLab) to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) facial photographs. In the stereophotogrammetry facial scanner group, the mannequin head was scanned with a stereophotogrammetry facial scanner (3dMD). Selected parameters were directly measured on the reconstructed 3D virtual faces using a CAD software. The same parameters were then measured directly on the mannequin head using the direct anthropometry (DA) method as the gold standard for later comparison. The accuracy of the facial scanners was evaluated in terms of trueness and precision. Trueness was evaluated by comparing the measurement results of the two groups with each other and with that of DA using equivalence tests and average absolute deviations, while precision and inter-operator reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A 3D facial mesh deviation between the two groups was also calculated for further reference using a 3D metrology software (GOM inspect pro).

RESULTS

In terms of trueness, the average absolute deviations between RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetry facial scanners, between RGB-D camera-based facial scanner and DA, and between stereophotogrammetry facial scanner and DA were statistically equivalent at 0.50±0.27 mm, 0.61±0.42 mm, and 0.28±0.14 mm, respectively. Equivalence test results confirmed that their equivalence was within clinical requirements (<1 mm). The ICC for each parameter was approximately 0.999 in terms of precision and inter-operator reliability. A 3D facial mesh analysis suggested that the deviation between the two groups was 0.37±0.01 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

For facial scanners, an accuracy of <1 mm is commonly considered clinically acceptable. Both the RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetry facial scanners in this study showed acceptable trueness, high precision, and inter-operator reliability. A low-cost RGB-D camera-based facial scanner could be an eligible clinical substitute for traditional stereophotogrammetry.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The low-cost RGB-D camera-based facial scanner showed clinically acceptable trueness, high precision, and inter-operator reliability; thus, it could be an eligible clinical substitute for traditional stereophotogrammetry.

The Construction and Evaluation of a Multi-Task Convolutional Neural Network for a Cone-Beam Computed-Tomography-Based Assessment of Implant Stability

Objectives: Assessing implant stability is integral to dental implant therapy. This study aimed to construct a multi-task cascade convolution neural network to evaluate implant stability using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: A dataset of 779 implant coronal section images was obtained from CBCT scans, and matching clinical information was used for the training and test datasets. We developed a multi-task cascade network based on CBCT to assess implant stability. We used the MobilenetV2-DeeplabV3+ semantic segmentation network, combined with an image processing algorithm in conjunction with prior knowledge, to generate the volume of interest (VOI) that was eventually used for the ResNet-50 classification of implant stability. The performance of the multitask cascade network was evaluated in a test set by comparing the implant stability quotient (ISQ), measured using an Osstell device. Results: The cascade network established in this study showed good prediction performance for implant stability classification. The binary, ternary, and quaternary ISQ classification test set accuracies were 96.13%, 95.33%, and 92.90%, with mean precisions of 96.20%, 95.33%, and 93.71%, respectively. In addition, this cascade network evaluated each implant's stability in only 3.76 s, indicating high efficiency. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to present a CBCT-based deep learning approach CBCT to assess implant stability. The multi-task cascade network accomplishes a series of tasks related to implant denture segmentation, VOI extraction, and implant stability classification, and has good concordance with the ISQ.

Present status and future directions: Imaging techniques for the detection of periapical lesions

Diagnosing and treating apical periodontitis (AP) in an attempt to preserve the natural dentition, and to prevent the direct and indirect systemic effects of this condition, is the major goal in endodontics. Considering that AP is frequently asymptomatic, and is most often associated with a lesion in the periapex of the affected tooth, within the maxillary bones, imaging becomes of paramount importance for the diagnosis of the disease. The aim of this narrative review was to investigate the most relevant classic and current literature to describe which are, to date, the diagnostic imaging systems most reliable and advanced to achieve the early and predictable detection of AP, the best measures of the lesions and the disclosure of the different features of the disease. Dental panoramic tomography (DPT) is a classic exam, considered still useful to provide the basic diagnosis of AP in certain districts of the maxillary bones. Periapical radiographs (PRs) represent a valid routine examination, with few, known limitations. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is the only system that ensures the early and predictable detection of all periapical lesions in the jaws, with the minor risk of false positives. These techniques can be successfully implemented, with ultrasounds (USI) or magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging, exams that do not use ionising radiations. MRI and USI provide information on specific features of the lesions, like the presence and amount of vascular supply, their content and their relationship with the surrounding soft tissues, leading to differential diagnoses. Further, all the three-dimensional systems (CBCT, USI and MRI) allow the volumetric assessment of AP. Pioneering research on artificial intelligence is slowly progressing in the detection of periapical radiolucencies on DPTs, PRs and CBCTs, however, with promising results. Finally, it is established that all imaging techniques have to be associated with a thorough clinical examination and a good degree of calibration of the operator.