Ligation of E-cadherin molecules on murine resident Langerhans cells inhibits their maturation and chemokine production

Role for E-cadherin as an inhibitory receptor on epidermal gammadelta T cells

E-cadherin is a homophilic adhesion molecule that maintains homotypic intercellular adhesion between epithelial cells such as epidermal keratinocytes. E-cadherin is also expressed on resident murine epidermal γδ T cells, known as dendritic epidermal T cells (DETCs), but they express another receptor for E-cadherin, α(E)(CD103)β(7) integrin, as well. In this study, we analyzed functional differences between E-cadherin-mediated homophilic binding and heterophilic binding of α(E)β(7) integrin to E-cadherin in heterotypic intercellular adhesion of DETCs to keratinocytes. E-cadherin, but not α(E)β(7) integrin, was downregulated on activation of DETCs in vivo and in vitro. Short-term (1-h) adhesion of DETCs to keratinocytes in vitro was primarily mediated by α(E)β(7) integrin, and blocking of the binding of α(E)β(7) integrin to E-cadherin inhibited the lysis of keratinocytes by DETCs. Stable binding of E-cadherin on DETCs to plate-bound recombinant E-cadherin was observed only after 24-h culture in vitro. Cytokine production and degranulation by DETCs in response to suboptimal TCR cross-linking and mitogen stimulation were augmented by coligation of α(E)β(7) integrin. In contrast, engagement of E-cadherin on DETCs with immobilized anti-E-cadherin Ab, plate-bound recombinant E-cadherin, and E-cadherin on keratinocytes inhibited DETC activation. Therefore, E-cadherin acts as an inhibitory receptor on DETCs, whereas α(E)β(7) integrin acts as a costimulatory receptor. Differential expression of E-cadherin and α(E)β(7) integrin on resting and activated DETCs, as well as their opposite functions in DETC activation, suggests that E-cadherin and α(E)β(7) integrin on DETCs regulate their activation threshold through binding to E-cadherin on keratinocytes.

CD34-derived human Langerhans cells stimulate a T helper type 2 response independently of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation

Dendritic cell (DC) subsets can mediate diverse responses, but little is known about the Toll-like receptor (TLR) signalling pathways in different human DC subsets. Despite expressing many TLRs in common, we found that in vitro-derived Langerhans cells (LCs) and monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs) undergo differential signalling events following TLR stimulation. TLR-stimulated LCs did not secrete interleukin (IL)-12p70 and thus induced a T helper type 2 (Th2)-biased response. moDCs secrete high levels of IL-12p70 and induce a Th1 response. Stimulation of moDCs through TLR2 or TLR7/8 was able to induce phosphorylation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK). However, phosphorylated ERK was not induced in TLR-stimulated LCs, suggesting an ERK-independent method of Th2 cell induction. Inhibition of p38 MAPK suppressed moDC maturation, but was much less effective at inhibiting LC maturation. Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) was also found to play a greater role in moDC survival compared with the LCs. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) arrays to compare the expression of signalling molecules in LCs and moDCs identified differences in TLR recognition molecules and cytokine response genes, suggesting that differential functional responses are probably mediated at the post-transcriptional level. Thus we have described differences in LC and moDC responses to TLR stimulation, and have identified key differences in ERK phosphorylation and the involvement of MAPK and PI3K.

Role of Langerhans cells in cutaneous protective immunity: is the reappraisal necessary?

Langerhans cells (LC) are constantly exposed to external antigens and pathogens, and they are the cutaneous counterpart of dendritic cells (DC). DC not only act as professional antigen presenting cells to induce antigen-specific T cells for adaptive immune responses, but they also initiate a cascade of innate immune responses by sensing these danger signals. However, recent studies challenge the classical paradigm to position LC in the center of cutaneous immunity. Although LC express toll-like receptors (TLRs) that recognize bacterial and viral products, exposure to pathogen-associated TLR ligands triggers neither sufficient LC maturation nor good production of cytokines and chemokines. LC also lack the ability to produce IFN-gamma by any stimuli, and together with the characteristics of LC that are prone to produce Th2-type chemokines and to produce much less IL-12 in the presence of keratinocyte-derived GM-CSF, LC primarily may not have the character to induce Th1- and Tc1-type immune responses necessary for protective cellular immunity. Moreover, LC maturation is inhibited, rather than enhanced, by type I IFNs that are abundantly produced in viral infections in the skin microenvironment. Finally, recent data suggest that LC may not directly present viral antigens to T cells for their activation in mouse models of cutaneous viral infection. The alternative player in protective immune responses may be surrounding keratinocytes, which may modulate LC functions indirectly. Dermal DC may also participate in this scheme. Further studies are required to clarify the role of LC in their interplay with keratinocytes and other DC subsets, and to draw the entire picture of the cutaneous immune system against pathogens.