1
|
Parovel G. Perceiving animacy from kinematics: visual specification of life-likeness in simple geometric patterns. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1167809. [PMID: 37333577 PMCID: PMC10273680 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1167809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the seminal work of Heider and Simmel, and Michotte's research, many studies have shown that, under appropriate conditions, displays of simple geometric shapes elicit rich and vivid impressions of animacy and intentionality. The main purpose of this review is to emphasize the close relationship between kinematics and perceived animacy by showing which specific motion cues and spatiotemporal patterns automatically trigger visual perceptions of animacy and intentionality. The animacy phenomenon has been demonstrated to be rather fast, automatic, irresistible, and highly stimulus-driven. Moreover, there is growing evidence that animacy attributions, although usually associated with higher-level cognition and long-term memory, may reflect highly specialized visual processes that have evolved to support adaptive behaviors critical for survival. The hypothesis of a life-detector hardwired in the perceptual system is also supported by recent studies in early development and animal cognition, as well as by the issue of the "irresistibility" criterion, i.e., the persistence of animacy perception in adulthood even in the face of conflicting background knowledge. Finally, further support for the hypothesis that animacy is processed in the earliest stages of vision comes from recent experimental evidence on the interaction of animacy with other visual processes, such as visuomotor performance, visual memory, and speed estimation. Summarizing, the ability to detect animacy in all its nuances may be related to the visual system's sensitivity to those changes in kinematics - considered as a multifactorial relational system - that are associated with the presence of living beings, as opposed to the natural, inert behavior of physically constrained, form-invariant objects, or even mutually independent moving agents. This broad predisposition would allow the observer not only to identify the presence of animates and to distinguish them from inanimate, but also to quickly grasp their psychological, emotional, and social characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Parovel
- Department of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The possibility of an impetus heuristic. Psychon Bull Rev 2022; 29:2015-2033. [PMID: 35705791 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02130-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Evidence consistent with a belief in impetus is drawn from studies of naïve physics, perception of causality, perception of force, and representational momentum, and the possibility of an impetus heuristic is discussed. An impetus heuristic suggests the motion path of an object that was previously constrained or influenced by an external source (e.g., object, force) appears to exhibit the same constraint or influence even after that constraint or influence is removed. Impetus is not a valid physical principle, but use of an impetus heuristic can in some circumstances provide approximately correct predictions regarding future object motion, and such predictions require less cognitive effort and resources than would predictions based upon objective physical principles. The relationship of an impetus heuristic to naïve impetus theory and to objective physical principles is discussed, and use of an impetus heuristic significantly challenges claims that causality or force can be visually perceived. Alternatives to an impetus heuristic are considered, and potential boundary conditions and falsification of the impetus notion are discussed. Overall, use of an impetus heuristic offers a parsimonious explanation for findings across a wide range of perceptual domains and could potentially be extended to more metaphorical types of motion.
Collapse
|
3
|
Geraci A, Simion F. Evaluation of prosocial actions performed by dynamic shapes at 17 months of age. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2021.1957823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Geraci
- Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Francesca Simion
- Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialisation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Biondi M, Hirshkowitz A, Stotler J, Wilcox T. Cortical Activation to Social and Mechanical Stimuli in the Infant Brain. Front Syst Neurosci 2021; 15:510030. [PMID: 34248512 PMCID: PMC8264292 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.510030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
From the early days of life infants distinguish between social and non-social physical entities and have different expectations for the way these two entities should move and interact. At the same time, we know very little about the cortical systems that support this early emerging ability. The goal of the current research was to assess the extent to which infant's processing of social and non-social physical entities is mediated by distinct information processing systems in the temporal cortex. Using a cross-sectional design, infants aged 6-9 months (Experiment 1) and 11-18 months (Experiment 2) were presented with two types of events: social interaction and mechanical interaction. In the social interaction event (patterned after Hamlin et al., 2007), an entity with googly eyes, hair tufts, and an implied goal of moving up the hill was either helped up, or pushed down, a hill through the actions of another social entity. In the mechanical interaction event, the googly eyes and hair tufts were replaced with vertical black dots and a hook and clasp, and the objects moved up or down the hill via mechanical interactions. FNIRS was used to measure activation from temporal cortex while infants viewed the test events. In both age groups, viewing social and mechanical interaction events elicited different patterns of activation in the right temporal cortex, although responses were more specialized in the older age group. Activation was not obtained in these areas when the objects moved in synchrony without interacting, suggesting that the causal nature of the interaction events may be responsible, in part, to the results obtained. This is one of the few fNIRS studies that has investigated age-related patterns of cortical activation and the first to provide insight into the functional development of networks specialized for processing of social and non-social physical entities engaged in interaction events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisa Biondi
- Tobii Pro, College Station, TX, United States.,Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Amy Hirshkowitz
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.,Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jacqueline Stotler
- Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States
| | - Teresa Wilcox
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.,Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parovel G, Guidi S. Speed Overestimation of the Moving Away Object in the Intentional Reaction Causal Effect. Iperception 2020; 11:2041669520980019. [PMID: 33489073 PMCID: PMC7768325 DOI: 10.1177/2041669520980019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe a new illusory speed effect arising in visual events developed by Michotte (1946/1963) in studies of causal perception and, more specifically, within the so-called intentional reaction effect: When an Object B is seen intentionally escaping from another Object A, its perceived speed is overestimated. In Experiment 1, we used two-alternative forced choice comparisons to estimate perceived speed scale values for a small square moving either alone or in different contexts known to elicit different impressions of animacy (Parovel et al., 2018). The results showed that B's speed was overestimated only in the condition in which it moved away from another approaching square moving in a nonrigid way, like a caterpillar. In Experiment 2, we psychophysically measured the magnitude of speed overestimation in that condition and tested whether it could be affected by further animacy cues related to the escaping object (the actual velocity of the square) and to the approaching square (its type of motion: caterpillar or linear). Results confirmed that B's speed was overestimated up to 10% and that the degree of overestimation was affected by both experimental factors, being greater at higher speeds and when the chasing object moved in an animate fashion. This speed bias might be related to a higher sensitivity of the visual processes to threat-related events such as fighting and chasing, leading to evolutionary adaptive behaviours such as speedy flight from predators, but also empathy and emotion understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Parovel
- Department of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Stefano Guidi
- Department of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Galazka M, Nyström P. Infants' preference for individual agents within chasing interactions. J Exp Child Psychol 2016; 147:53-70. [PMID: 27017143 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2015] [Revised: 02/19/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Infants, like adults, are able to discriminate between chasing and non-chasing interactions when watching animations with simple geometric shapes. But where infants derive the necessary information for discrimination and how chasing detection influences later visual attention has been previously unexplored. Here, using eye tracking, we investigated how 5- and 12-month-old infants (N=94) distribute their visual attention among individual members within different interactions depending on a type of interaction. Infant gaze was examined when observing animations depicting chasing and following interactions compared with animations displaying randomly moving shapes. Results demonstrate that when observing chasing and following interactions, all infants strongly preferred to attend to the agent that initiates an interaction and trails behind another. Low-level features, such as changes in agent-specific velocity profiles, could not account for this preference (Study 2). Rather, the strong preference for the agent going behind seems to be dependent on the initial goal-directed or "heat-seeking" motion of one agent toward another (Study 3). The current set of experiments suggests that, similar to adults, 5-months-olds' visual attention depends on the motion features of an individual agent within the interaction and is fine-tuned to agents that display goal-directed motion toward other agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martyna Galazka
- Uppsala Child and Baby Lab, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, S-751 42 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Pär Nyström
- Uppsala Child and Baby Lab, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, S-751 42 Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- Renée Baillargeon
- Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois 61820; ,
| | - Rose M. Scott
- Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced, California 95343;
| | - Lin Bian
- Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois 61820; ,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Galazka M, Nyström P. Visual Attention to Dynamic Spatial Relations in Infants and Adults. INFANCY 2015. [DOI: 10.1111/infa.12091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martyna Galazka
- Uppsala Child and Baby Lab; Department of Psychology; Uppsala University
| | - Pär Nyström
- Uppsala Child and Baby Lab; Department of Psychology; Uppsala University
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schlottmann A, Cole K, Watts R, White M. Domain-specific perceptual causality in children depends on the spatio-temporal configuration, not motion onset. Front Psychol 2013; 4:365. [PMID: 23874308 PMCID: PMC3708160 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2012] [Accepted: 06/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Humans, even babies, perceive causality when one shape moves briefly and linearly after another. Motion timing is crucial in this and causal impressions disappear with short delays between motions. However, the role of temporal information is more complex: it is both a cue to causality and a factor that constrains processing. It affects ability to distinguish causality from non-causality, and social from mechanical causality. Here we study both issues with 3- to 7-year-olds and adults who saw two computer-animated squares and chose if a picture of mechanical, social or non-causality fit each event best. Prior work fit with the standard view that early in development, the distinction between the social and physical domains depends mainly on whether or not the agents make contact, and that this reflects concern with domain-specific motion onset, in particular, whether the motion is self-initiated or not. The present experiments challenge both parts of this position. In Experiments 1 and 2, we showed that not just spatial, but also animacy and temporal information affect how children distinguish between physical and social causality. In Experiments 3 and 4 we showed that children do not seem to use spatio-temporal information in perceptual causality to make inferences about self- or other-initiated motion onset. Overall, spatial contact may be developmentally primary in domain-specific perceptual causality in that it is processed easily and is dominant over competing cues, but it is not the only cue used early on and it is not used to infer motion onset. Instead, domain-specific causal impressions may be automatic reactions to specific perceptual configurations, with a complex role for temporal information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Schlottmann
- Developmental Science Department, University College London London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mascalzoni E, Regolin L, Vallortigara G, Simion F. The cradle of causal reasoning: newborns' preference for physical causality. Dev Sci 2013; 16:327-35. [PMID: 23587033 DOI: 10.1111/desc.12018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2010] [Accepted: 09/07/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Perception of mechanical (i.e. physical) causality, in terms of a cause-effect relationship between two motion events, appears to be a powerful mechanism in our daily experience. In spite of a growing interest in the earliest causal representations, the role of experience in the origin of this sensitivity is still a matter of dispute. Here, we asked the question about the innate origin of causal perception, never tested before at birth. Three experiments were carried out to investigate sensitivity at birth to some visual spatiotemporal cues present in a launching event. Newborn babies, only a few hours old, showed that they significantly preferred a physical causality event (i.e. Michotte's Launching effect) when matched to a delay event (i.e. a delayed launching; Experiment 1) or to a non-causal event completely identical to the causal one except for the order of the displacements of the two objects involved which was swapped temporally (Experiment 3). This preference for the launching event, moreover, also depended on the continuity of the trajectory between the objects involved in the event (Experiment 2). These results support the hypothesis that the human system possesses an early available, possibly innate basic mechanism to compute causality, such a mechanism being sensitive to the additive effect of certain well-defined spatiotemporal cues present in the causal event independently of any prior visual experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Mascalzoni
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Muentener P, Friel D, Schulz L. Giving the giggles: prediction, intervention, and young children's representation of psychological events. PLoS One 2012; 7:e42495. [PMID: 22916130 PMCID: PMC3423398 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2012] [Accepted: 07/09/2012] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Adults recognize that if event A predicts event B, intervening on A might generate B. Research suggests that young children have difficulty making this inference unless the events are initiated by goal-directed actions [1]. The current study tested the domain-generality and development of this phenomenon. Replicating previous work, when the events involved a physical outcome, toddlers (mean: 24 months) failed to generalize the outcome of spontaneously occurring predictive events to their own interventions; toddlers did generalize from prediction to intervention when the events involved a psychological outcome. We discuss these findings as they bear on the development of causal concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Muentener
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|