Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI): What is the minimal number of leads needed to obtain a good spatial resolution?

An expert review of the inverse problem in electrocardiographic imaging for the non-invasive identification of atrial fibrillation drivers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) has emerged as a non-invasive approach to identify atrial fibrillation (AF) driver sources. This paper aims to collect and review the current research literature on the ECGI inverse problem, summarize the research progress, and propose potential research directions for the future.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The effectiveness and feasibility of using ECGI to map AF driver sources may be influenced by several factors, such as inaccuracies in the atrial model due to heart movement or deformation, noise interference in high-density body surface potential (BSP), inconvenient and time-consuming BSP acquisition, errors in solving the inverse problem, and incomplete interpretation of the AF driving source information derived from the reconstructed epicardial potential. We review the current research progress on these factors and discuss possible improvement directions. Additionally, we highlight the limitations of ECGI itself, including the lack of a gold standard to validate the accuracy of ECGI technology in locating AF drivers and the challenges associated with guiding AF ablation based on post-processed epicardial potentials due to the intrinsic difference between epicardial and endocardial potentials.

CONCLUSIONS

Before performing ablation, ECGI can provide operators with predictive information about the underlying locations of AF driver by non-invasively and globally mapping the biatrial electrical activity. In the future, endocardial catheter mapping technology may benefit from the use of ECGI to enhance the diagnosis and ablation of AF.

A two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source

Introduction: The inverse problem of electrocardiography noninvasively localizes the origin of undesired cardiac activity, such as a premature ventricular contraction (PVC), from potential recordings from multiple torso electrodes. However, the optimal number and placement of electrodes for an accurate solution of the inverse problem remain undetermined. This study presents a two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source, which investigates the significance of the torso electrodes on a patient-specific level. Furthermore, the impact of the significant electrodes on the accuracy of the inverse solution is studied. Methods: Body surface potential recordings from 128 electrodes of 13 patients with PVCs and their corresponding homogeneous and inhomogeneous torso models were used. The inverse problem using a single dipole was solved in two steps: First, using information from all electrodes, and second, using a subset of electrodes sorted in descending order according to their significance estimated by a greedy algorithm. The significance of electrodes was computed for three criteria derived from the singular values of the transfer matrix that correspond to the inversely estimated origin of the PVC computed in the first step. The localization error (LE) was computed as the Euclidean distance between the ground truth and the inversely estimated origin of the PVC. The LE obtained using the 32 and 64 most significant electrodes was compared to the LE obtained when all 128 electrodes were used for the inverse solution. Results: The average LE calculated for both torso models and using all 128 electrodes was 28.8 ± 11.9 mm. For the three tested criteria, the average LEs were 32.6 ± 19.9 mm, 29.6 ± 14.7 mm, and 28.8 ± 14.5 mm when 32 electrodes were used. When 64 electrodes were used, the average LEs were 30.1 ± 16.8 mm, 29.4 ± 12.0 mm, and 29.5 ± 12.6 mm. Conclusion: The study found inter-patient variability in the significance of torso electrodes and demonstrated that an accurate localization by the inverse solution with a single dipole could be achieved using a carefully selected reduced number of electrodes.

Electrocardiographic imaging to guide ablation of ventricular arrhythmias and agreement between two different systems

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A recent study using an epicardial-only electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI), suggests that the agreement of ECGI activation mapping and that of the contact mapping for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is poor. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of two endo-epicardial ECGI systems using different cardiac sources and the agreement between them.

METHODS

We performed 69 ECGI procedures in 52 patients referred for ablation of VA at our center. One system based on the extracellular potentials was used in 26 patients, the other based on the equivalent double layer model in 9, and both in 17 patients. The first uses up to 224 leads and the second just the 12‑lead ECG. The localization of the VA was done using a segmental model of the ventricles. A perfect match (PM) was defined as a predicted location within the same anatomic segment, whereas a near match (NM) as a predicted location within the same segment or a contiguous one.

RESULTS

44 patients underwent ablation, corresponding to 58 ECGI procedures (37 with the first and 21 with the second system). The percentage of PMs and NMs was not significantly different between the two systems, respectively 76% and 95%, p = 0.077, and 97% and 100%, p = 1.000. In 14 patients that underwent ablation and had the ECGI performed with both systems, raw agreement for PMs was 79%, p = 0.250 for disagreement.

CONCLUSIONS

ECGI systems were useful to identify the origin of the VAs, and the results were reproducible regardless the cardiac source.

Robustness of imageless electrocardiographic imaging against uncertainty in atrial morphology and location

INTRODUCTION

Electrocardiographic Imaging is a non-invasive technique that requires cardiac Imaging for the reconstruction of cardiac electrical activity. In this study, we explored imageless ECGI by quantifying the errors of using heart meshes with either an inaccurate location inside the thorax or an inaccurate geometry.

METHODS

Multiple‑lead body surface recordings of 25 atrial fibrillation (AF) patients were recorded. Cardiac atrial meshes were obtained by segmentation of medical images obtained for each patient. ECGI was computed with each patient's segmented atrial mesh and compared with the ECGI obtained under errors in the atrial mesh used for ECGI estimation. We modeled both the uncertainty in the location of the atria inside the thorax by artificially translating the atria inside the thorax and the geometry of the atrial mesh by using an atrial mesh in a reference database. ECGI signals obtained with the actual meshes and the translated or estimated meshes were compared in terms of their correlation coefficients, relative difference measurement star, and errors in the dominant frequency (DF) estimation in epicardial nodes.

RESULTS

CC between ECGI signals obtained after translating the actual atrial meshes from the original position by 1 cm was above 0.97. CC between ECGIs obtained with patient specific atrial geometry and estimated atrial geometries was 0.93 ± 0.11. Mean errors in DF estimation using an estimated atrial mesh were 7.6 ± 5.9%.

CONCLUSION

Imageless ECGI can provide a robust estimation of cardiac electrophysiological parameters such as activation rates even during complex arrhythmias. Furthermore, it can allow more widespread use of ECGI in clinical practice.

Solving the inverse problem in electrocardiography imaging for atrial fibrillation using various time-frequency decomposition techniques based on empirical mode decomposition: A comparative study

Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) can aid in identifying the driving sources that cause and sustain atrial fibrillation (AF). Traditional regularization strategies for addressing the ECGI inverse problem are not currently concerned about the multi-scale analysis of the inverse problem, and these techniques are not clinically reliable. We have previously investigated the solution based on uniform phase mode decomposition (UPEMD-based) to the ECGI inverse problem. Numerous other methods for the time-frequency analysis derived from empirical mode decomposition (EMD-based) have not been applied to the inverse problem in ECGI. By applying many EMD-based solutions to the ECGI inverse problem and evaluating the performance of these solutions, we hope to find a more efficient EMD-based solution to the ECGI inverse problem. In this study, five AF simulation datasets and two real datasets from AF patients derived from a clinical ablation procedure are employed to evaluate the operating efficiency of several EMD-based solutions. The Pearson's correlation coefficient (CC), the relative difference measurement star (RDMS) of the computed epicardial dominant frequency (DF) map and driver probability (DP) map, and the distance (Dis) between the estimated and referenced most probable driving sources are used to evaluate the application of various EMD-based solutions in ECGI. The results show that for DF maps on all simulation datasets, the CC of UPEMD-based and improved UPEMD (IUPEMD)-based techniques are both greater than 0.95 and the CC of the empirical wavelet transform (EWT)-based solution is greater than 0.889, and the RDMS of UPEMD-based and IUPEMD-based approaches is less than 0.3 overall and the RDMS of EWT-based method is less than 0.48, performing better than other EMD-based solutions; for DP maps, the CC of UPEMD-based and IUPEMD-based techniques are close to 0.5, the CC of EWT-based is 0.449, and the CC of the remaining EMD-based techniques on the SAF and CAF is all below 0.1; the RDMS of UPEMD-based and IUPEMD-based are 0.06∼0.9 less than that of other EMD-based methods for all the simulation datasets overall. On two authentic AF datasets, the Dis between the first 10 real and estimated maximum DF positions of UPEMD-based and EWT-based methods are 212∼1440 less than that of others, demonstrating these two EMD-based solutions are superior and are suggested for clinical application in solving the ECGI inverse problem. On all datasets, EWT-based algorithms deconstruct the signal in the shortest time (no more than 0.12s), followed by UPEMD-based solutions (less than 0.81s), showing that these two schemes are more efficient than others.

Assessment of wave front activation duration and speed across the right ventricular outflow tract using electrocardiographic imaging as predictors of the origin of the premature ventricular contractions: A validation study

AIMS

Evaluate right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) activation duration (AD) and speed, invasively and with the electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI), as predictors of the origin of the PVCs, validating the ECGI.

METHODS

18 consecutive patients, 8 males, median age 55 (35-63) years that underwent ablation of PVCs with inferior axis and had ECGI performed before ablation. Isochronal activation maps of the RVOT in PVC were obtained with the ECGI and invasively. Total RVOT AD was measured as the time between earliest and latest activated region, and propagation speed by measuring the area of the first 10 ms of activation. Cut-off values for AD, activation speed and number of 10 ms isochrones to predict the origin of the PVCs, were obtained with the ROC curve analysis. Agreement between methods was done with Pearson correlation test and Bland-Altman plot.

RESULTS

PVCs originated from the RVOT in 11 (61%) patients. The stronger predictor of PVC origin was the AD. The median AD in PVCs from RVOT was significantly longer than from outside the RVOT, both with ECGI and invasively, respectively 62 (58-73) vs 37 (33-40) ms, p < 0.0001 and 68 (60-75) vs 35 (29-41) ms, p < 0.0001. Agreement between the two methods was good (r = 0.864, p < 0.0001). The cut-off value of 43 ms for AD measured with ECGI predicted the origin of the PVCs with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found good agreement between ECGI and invasive map. The AD measured with ECGI was the best predictor of the origin of the PVCs.

Body Surface Potential Mapping: Contemporary Applications and Future Perspectives

Body surface potential mapping (BSPM) is a noninvasive modality to assess cardiac bioelectric activity with a rich history of practical applications for both research and clinical investigation. BSPM provides comprehensive acquisition of bioelectric signals across the entire thorax, allowing for more complex and extensive analysis than the standard electrocardiogram (ECG). Despite its advantages, BSPM is not a common clinical tool. BSPM does, however, serve as a valuable research tool and as an input for other modes of analysis such as electrocardiographic imaging and, more recently, machine learning and artificial intelligence. In this report, we examine contemporary uses of BSPM, and provide an assessment of its future prospects in both clinical and research environments. We assess the state of the art of BSPM implementations and explore modern applications of advanced modeling and statistical analysis of BSPM data. We predict that BSPM will continue to be a valuable research tool, and will find clinical utility at the intersection of computational modeling approaches and artificial intelligence.

Electrocardiographic Imaging for Atrial Fibrillation: A Perspective From Computer Models and Animal Experiments to Clinical Value

Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) is a technique to reconstruct non-invasively the electrical activity on the heart surface from body-surface potential recordings and geometric information of the torso and the heart. ECGI has shown scientific and clinical value when used to characterize and treat both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Regarding atrial fibrillation (AF), the characterization of the electrical propagation and the underlying substrate favoring AF is inherently more challenging than for ventricular arrhythmias, due to the progressive and heterogeneous nature of the disease and its manifestation, the small volume and wall thickness of the atria, and the relatively large role of microstructural abnormalities in AF. At the same time, ECGI has the advantage over other mapping technologies of allowing a global characterization of atrial electrical activity at every atrial beat and non-invasively. However, since ECGI is time-consuming and costly and the use of electrical mapping to guide AF ablation is still not fully established, the clinical value of ECGI for AF is still under assessment. Nonetheless, AF is known to be the manifestation of a complex interaction between electrical and structural abnormalities and therefore, true electro-anatomical-structural imaging may elucidate important key factors of AF development, progression, and treatment. Therefore, it is paramount to identify which clinical questions could be successfully addressed by ECGI when it comes to AF characterization and treatment, and which questions may be beyond its technical limitations. In this manuscript we review the questions that researchers have tried to address on the use of ECGI for AF characterization and treatment guidance (for example, localization of AF triggers and sustaining mechanisms), and we discuss the technological requirements and validation. We address experimental and clinical results, limitations, and future challenges for fruitful application of ECGI for AF understanding and management. We pay attention to existing techniques and clinical application, to computer models and (animal or human) experiments, to challenges of methodological and clinical validation. The overall objective of the study is to provide a consensus on valuable directions that ECGI research may take to provide future improvements in AF characterization and treatment guidance.