A possible anatomical and biomechanical explanation of the 10% rule used in the clinical assessment of prehensile hand movements and handed dominance

A comprehensive scoping review and meta-analysis of upper limb strength asymmetry

The "10% rule" of handedness asserts the dominant hand is 10% stronger than the non-dominant hand. Primarily derived from handgrip data, it is unclear if a generalized asymmetry exists across the upper limb. Understanding how strength asymmetry may be affected by handedness, sex, and exertion type has important implications for ergonomics design, sports performance, and clinical rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to systematically synthesize currently available evidence examining upper limb strength asymmetry. 10,061 results were retrieved, and 174 studies remained after title/abstract screening. 87 studies were synthesized. Results are compiled by exertion type and manner of asymmetry comparison (i.e. right/left, dominant/non-dominant). Asymmetry ratios were calculated to examine the effects of handedness, exertion side, arm region, and sex. Strength differences were most frequently reported for grip exertions (n = 49). 25 studies reported other joint strength asymmetries. Overall, the right limb was 6.7% stronger than the left limb (n = 9342) and the dominant limb was 11.6% stronger than the non-dominant limb (n = 9327), though strength asymmetry varied across joints and movements (2.1% to 19.5%). This research demonstrates that the 10% rule is a good approximation for upper limb strength asymmetry. However, several factors, including joint, movement type, and sex, can affect this relationship.

Biomechanical Factors Predisposing to Knee Injuries in Junior Female Basketball Players

This cross-sectional observational study aims to determine isokinetic normality data at different speeds, and isometric data of ankle and knee joints, in healthy basketball players aged 15-16 years old. The participants were recruited through non-probabilistic convenience sampling. Sociodemographic, anthropometric, and biomechanical variables were collected. The study involved 42 participants. Right-leg dominance was higher in women (85.7%) than in men (78.6%). Men had a higher weight, height, and body mass index compared to women. Statistically significant differences were observed between sex and height (p < 0.001). Significant differences were found between sexes in knee flexor and extensor strength at different isokinetic speeds (30°, 120°, and 180°/s), except for the maximum peak strength knee flexion at 180°/s in the right leg. In the ankle, the variables inversion, eversion, and work strength values at different isokinetic speeds and full RoM, by sex, were not significantly different, except for the right (p = 0.004) and the left (p = 0.035) ankle full RoM. The study found lower knee extensor strength in women, indicating the need to improve knee flexor/extensor strength in women to match that of men, as seen in other joints. The results can guide the development of preventive and therapeutic interventions for lower limb injuries in basketball players.

The effect of handedness on upper extremity isometric strength symmetry

BACKGROUND

Understanding upper extremity strength symmetry can have important implications for ergonomics assessment and design. Few studies have examined isometric joint strength symmetry of left-handed individuals, or examined how handedness can influence strength. As such, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of handedness on dominant/non-dominant (D/ND) strength ratio in several moment directions about the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand. It was hypothesized that the isometric strength symmetry of left-handed individuals would be significantly different from that of right-handed individuals.

METHODS

The study recruited 28 participants to perform a series of maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs) with both arms for various efforts about the shoulder, elbow, and wrist, as well as handgrip for a total of 68 MVCs. Strength symmetry ratios were computed, and a two-way mixed-model ANOVA evaluated the effects of handedness and MVC test on strength symmetry.

INTERPRETATION

Significant differences in D/ND ratios between right and left-handed individuals were found for 11 of the 17 explored exertion directions. Left-handed individuals tended to possess greater strength in their non-dominant limb, while right-handed individuals tended to have greater strength in their dominant limb. Left- and right-handed individuals often significantly differed in D/ND ratio, suggesting that separate normative values should be created to account for handedness when considering return-to-work or strength-based ergonomics design criterion.

Association between handgrip strength asymmetry and cognitive function across ethnicity in rural China: a cross-sectional study

Background

Recently, the association between handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry and cognition has been revealed, but evidences are still scarce. Particularly, the association between asymmetric HGS and cognitive performance in various cognitive domains is unclear and whether this association is stable across ethnic groups is unknown.

Method

The population was from a longitudinal study in rural areas of Fuxin, Liaoning, China. The Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MOCA-BC) was used to evaluate the cognitive function. The HGS ratio was calculated as maximal non-dominant HGS divided by maximal dominant HGS. HGS ratio <0.9 or >1.1 was classified as asymmetric dominant/non-dominant HGS, respectively. Generalized linear models were used to analyze the relationship between asymmetric HGS and cognitive function adjusted for HGS, handedness, wave, age, sex, education, ethnicity, smoking, drinking, physical labor level, BMI, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia.

Result

A total of 2,969 participants ≥50 years were included in this study. Adjusted for HGS and other confunding variables, there was an inverted U-shaped association between HGS ratio and MoCA-BC scores (P _non-linear = 0.004). The association between HGS ratio and MoCA-BC scores was inconsistent among ethnic groups (P _interaction = 0.048). In Han, only asymmetric non-dominant HGS was associated with lower cognitive scores [β = -0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.26 ∼-0.08, P = 0.027]; in Mongolians, asymmetric dominant HGS(β = -0.60, 95% CI: -1.35 ∼ 0.15, P = 0.115) and asymmetric non-dominant HGS (β = -0.56, 95% CI: -1.42 ∼ 0.31, P = 0.206) were all associated with lower cognitive scores, although no statistical significance was found. Asymmetric non-dominant HGS and lower HGS, but not asymmetric dominant HGS were all independently associated with impairment of Delayed Recall (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05 ∼ 1.74; OR _{per 5 kg decrease} = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01 ∼ 1.21) and Fluency (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.15 ∼ 1.78; OR _{per 5 kg decrease} = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02 ∼ 1.19). Both asymmetric dominant HGS (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.07 ∼ 1.67) and lower HGS (OR _{per 5 kg decrease} = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.10 ∼ 1.32) were associated with impairment of visuoperception.

Conclusion

HGS and HGS asymmetry were all independently related to lower global cognitive performance. The association between HGS asymmetry and cognitive function varies among ethnic groups.

Posture, flexibility and grip strength in horse riders

Since the ability to train the horse to be ambidextrous is considered highly desirable, rider asymmetry is recognized as a negative trait. Acquired postural and functional asymmetry can originate from numerous anatomical regions, so it is difficult to suggest if any is developed due to riding. The aim of this study was therefore to assess symmetry of posture, strength and flexibility in a large population of riders and to determine whether typical traits exist due to riding. 127 right handed riders from the UK and USA were categorized according to years riding (in 20 year increments) and their competition level (using affiliated test levels). Leg length, grip strength and spinal posture were measured and recorded by a physiotherapist. Standing and sitting posture and trunk flexibility were measured with 3-D motion capture technology. Right-left differences were explored in relation to years riding and rider competitive experience. Significant anatomical asymmetry was found for the difference in standing acromion process height for a competition level (−0.07±1.50 cm Intro/Prelim; 0.02±1.31 cm Novice; 0.43±1.27 cm Elementary+; p=0.048) and for sitting iliac crest height for years riding (−0.23±1.36 cm Intro/Prelim; 0.01±1.50 cm Novice; 0.86±0.41 cm Elementary+; p=0.021). For functional asymmetry, a significant interaction was found for lateral bending ROM for years riding x competition level (p=0.047). The demands on dressage riders competing at higher levels may predispose these riders to a higher risk of developing asymmetry and potentially chronic back pain rather than improving their symmetry.