Isolated, spontaneous superior mesenteric and celiac artery dissection: case report and review of literature

When the Tree Branch Affects the Fruits: A Case of Celiac Artery Dissection

Arterial dissection is a laceration of an artery or arterial bed, that can extend to contiguous arteries and lead to accumulation of blood providing a great risk for thrombi formation, and possible ischemic events. Celiac artery dissection is a very rare pathology, with an unknown prevalence and a pathophysiology that still needs to be elucidated. Diagnosis has increased in the last decade due to higher imaging modalities and accessibility of such that provide simpler identification, as well as which treatment should be applied to a particular patient. In this case report, we present a 44-year-old male with abdominal pain, found to have on computed tomography angiography (CTA) a dissection of the celiac artery with extension to the splenic artery, causing multiple splenic infarcts, demonstrating that such lesions can be the cause of unexplained thrombosis in a certain patient population. Due to its complex presentation, management can differ based on the characteristics of the dissection as well as organ involvement, these modalities range from anticoagulation to surgical or endoscopic intervention. This case highlights the rare occurrence of an isolated dissection at a visceral artery causing thrombosis in a relatively healthy patient.

Spontaneous celiac artery dissection treated by balloon angioplasty

Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) is a rare condition, defined as dissection of the celiac artery without aortic involvement. Because of its low prevalence, most studies have been limited to case reports and case series. We have described the case of a 44-year-old woman who had presented with symptomatic SICAD that had resulted in compromised flow to the hepatic arteries and was successfully treated with balloon angioplasty. Angioplasty alone might be effective for cases of extensive false lumen thrombosis in SICAD for immediate flow restoration to the true lumen, expediting positive remodeling.

Evaluation of isolated abdominal visceral artery dissection with multi-scale spiral computed tomography: a retrospective case series

Background

To evaluate the role of multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) angiography in the diagnosis of spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection (SIVAD).

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with abdominal SIVAD were included in the study. The MSCT scans of the patients were subjected to various post-processing techniques to visualize the visceral artery wall. Clinical features including arterial dissection, thrombosis, dissection length, true/false lumen, and complications were recorded.

Results

Type I, IIa, and IIb SIVADs were observed in 11, 6, and 10 patients, respectively. Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection was the most common (n = 16), followed by abdominal aortic dissection (n = 6), splenic artery dissection (n = 2), renal artery dissection (n = 2), and splenic artery dissection (n = 1). One patient with SMA dissection suffered small intestine ischemia, 1 with splenic artery dissection had splenic infarction, and 1 patient with left renal artery dissection experienced renal infarction. The false lumen was bigger than the true lumen in 20 patients, with 9 patients having thrombus. The true lumen was bigger than the false lumen in 7 patients.

Conclusions

MSCT angiography is a valuable technique in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with SIVAD. Patients with abdominal pain suspected due to SIVAD should be examined with MSCT angiography for early detection of SIVAD.

Diagnosis and Management of Isolated Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The objective of this study was to analyze the three different management modalities for isolated superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection. We did a comprehensive literature search and found 703 articles on the initial search, out of which 111 articles consisting of 145 patients were selected for analysis. The mean age was 55.7 years (standard deviation,9.7;33-85) and 80.6% were male. These patients were managed conservatively (41.3%), endovascularly (28.1%) or surgically (30%). The median follow-up was 10 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4-18 months), 12 months (IQR, 6-19 months) and 14 months (IQR, 6-20 months) respectively. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was the most commonly used diagnostic tool in the conservative group (43.8%), while conventional CT scan was the most widely used in endovascular (58.1%) and surgical group (50%). 17% percent of the conservative group had SMA angiography for diagnosis, while this was less than 3% in the other groups. Of these patients, 96.7%, 97.4%, and 100.0% recovered successfully in the conservative, endovascular, and surgical groups respectively. There was no significant difference in the mortality between the three groups (Pearson χ²=0.482). This suggests a conservative and endovascular approach could be used in most patients, which can reduce costs and surgery-related morbidity and mortality. Surgical management should be reserved for cases having infarction or widespread bowel ischemia and in cases where other treatment modalities fail.

Interventional treatment of isolated dissection of the celiac artery: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Isolated dissection of the celiac artery (IDCA) is one of isolated visceral artery dissection, which can occur alone, and can also be complicated with superior mesenteric artery dissection and splenic artery pseudoaneurysm. This disease is very rare in clinic. The exact pathogenesis of IDCA remains unknown. At present, no consensus has yet been reached on the best treatment strategy for this rare disease. In the present study, the clinical data of one IDCA patient diagnosed and treated in our hospital was retrospectively analyzed, and related literatures were reviewed, in order to improve the understanding of the disease.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patient was a 49-year-old male, who was admitted in our hospital because of "pain of subxyphoid area for one month". One month before, the patient presented with persistent pain in the subxyphoid area after he had a cold, on paroxysmal exacerbation occurred. After taking "stomach drug", the subjective symptoms eased slightly, but the disease attacked again two hours later.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was diagnosed with "isolated dissection of the celiac artery" by enhanced CT.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was interventionally treated with bare stent implantation.

OUTCOMES

The symptom of the patient disappeared after interventional therapy.

LESSONS

In the present study, the clinical symptoms and treatment process of one patient with IDCA were described. The clinical symptoms of IDCA are often atypical, and its incidence is extremely low, therefore it is extremely easily misdiagnosed. The definite diagnosis depends on imaging examination. Interventional therapy is the first choice for treating this disease due to its advantages of small trauma and good curative effect.

Ten-year review of isolated spontaneous mesenteric arterial dissections

OBJECTIVE

Isolated spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and celiac artery (CA) remains a rare condition; however, it has been increasingly noted incidentally on diagnostic imaging. The purpose of this study was to examine the natural history and outcomes of patients presenting with isolated spontaneous mesenteric artery dissection (SMAD). We hypothesized that most SMADs can be treated nonoperatively.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of patients presenting with the diagnosis of SMAD between 2006 and 2016. Data analysis included demographics, clinical data, radiologic review, treatment, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients were found to have CA dissection, SMA dissection, or both in the absence of aortic dissection diagnosed on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The average age was 56 years (range, 26-86 years), 80% were male, and 10 patients (13%) had underlying connective tissue disorders. The majority, 64%, presented with symptoms including abdominal pain, back pain, and chest pain; the remaining 36% were asymptomatic. Combined SMA and CA dissection was found in 14 (18%) patients; 33 (43%) presented with isolated CA dissection, and 30 (39%) presented with isolated SMA dissection. Only four patients required intervention. Mesenteric bypass was performed in two patients, and SMA endarterectomy with patch angioplasty was performed in one patient for signs of bowel ischemia. No patient required bowel resection. The two bypasses were anastomosed to a branch of the SMA, and complete lumen restoration was seen on long-term imaging follow-up. One patient underwent stent grafting of the CA and hepatic artery for aneurysmal degeneration 1 month after diagnosis. The remaining 73 patients were managed nonoperatively; 40 (52%) were treated with a short course of anticoagulation, 23 (30%) were treated with antiplatelet therapy, and 10 (13%) were treated with observation alone. No other late interventions or recurrences were noted during a mean follow-up of 21 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas isolated SMAD poses a risk of visceral ischemia, most patients presenting with this diagnosis can be treated nonoperatively with a short course of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. Only a small number of patients require surgical revascularization for bowel ischemia.

Evaluation and management of symptomatic isolated spontaneous celiac trunk dissection

The purpose of this study is to describe 10 cases of symptomatic isolated spontaneous celiac trunk dissection (ISCTD) in order to evaluate the initial clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment modalities and outcomes. A retrospective search was performed from 2009 to 2014 and 10 patients with ISCTD were included in the study. Patients with associated aortic and/or other visceral artery dissection were excluded. The following information was collected from each case: sex, age, associated risk factors, symptoms, diagnostic method, anatomic dissection pattern, treatment modality and outcome. Most patients were male (90%), with an average age of 44.8 years, and the most common symptom was abdominal pain (100%). Hypertension and vasculitis (polyarteritis nodosa) were the most frequent risk factors (40% and 30%, respectively). Diagnosis was made in all patients with computed tomography. Dissection was limited to the celiac trunk in three patients and extended to celiac branches in the other seven. Initial conservative treatment was attempted in every case and was successful in nine patients. In one case, initial conservative treatment was unsuccessful and arterial stenting with coil embolization of the false lumen was performed. After successful initial treatment, late progression of the dissection to aneurysmal dilatation was observed in two patients and it was decided to perform endovascular treatment. Mean follow-up was 19 months, ranging from 2 to 59 months. In conclusion, initial conservative treatment seems adequate for most patients with ISCTD. Long-term follow-up is mandatory, owing to the risk of later progression to aneurysm.

Approaches to the management of spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous isolated celiac and superior mesenteric artery dissection without aortic dissection is a rare disease. Recently, an increasing number of cases have been diagnosed and the prognosis has improved significantly because of technical progress in computed tomography (CT). However, management approaches vary from conservative treatment or endovascular repair to open surgery. This study analyzed the clinical findings of patients with spontaneous visceral artery dissection, and attempted to illuminate how to manage these cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2005 to February 2012, a total of 17 patients were diagnosed with spontaneous isolated visceral artery dissection in the authors' hospital (4 celiac arteries, 12 superior mesenteric arteries, and 1 inferior mesenteric artery) based on CT findings. The clinical characteristics, Sakamoto's classification, imaging appearance, and early outcomes of these patients were retrospectively compared.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 51.47 ± 8.65 years (range, 39-73 years) and the mean follow-up period was 35.18 ± 25.55 months (range, 1-79 months). Fifteen (88.2%) patients had abdominal pain and no ischemic changes of the bowel. The dissections initiated at a mean distance of 13.04 ± 10.41 mm (range, 4.00-43.39 mm) from the origin of the artery, with a mean length of 53.39 ± 28.06 mm (range, 10.00-108.46 mm). There were 4 type I (23.8%), 1 type II (5.9%), 9 type III (52.9%), and 3 type IV (17.6%) dissections according to Sakamoto's classification. Treatments included observation without anticoagulation treatment in 3 patients (17.6%), anticoagulation treatment in 12 (70.6%), and endovascular stenting in 2 (11.8%). The disease stabilized in all patients during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

If bowel perfusion is not compromised and patency is well compensated by collateral circulation, most patients can be managed conservatively with or without anticoagulation treatment. However, patients must be monitored closely and followed up regularly for early detection of progression.

Isolated celiac and superior mesenteric artery dissection identified with MDCT: imaging findings and clinical course

OBJECTIVE

Isolated celiac or superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection is a rare entity in the absence of aortic dissection. Our objective was to detail imaging and clinical course of celiac and or SMA dissections.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective search from 2004 to 2010 using "celiac and/or SMA dissection" keywords. Analysis of medical record and imaging at diagnosis and follow-up was performed. Dissections for any reason without aortic dissection were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-four celiac and 18 SMA dissections were detected in 38 patients. One third of the dissections diagnosed with interactive multiplanar reconstruction/maximum intensity projection (MIP)/3-dimensional (3D) rendering were missed on standard imaging planes. No patients had bowel ischemia or died. Eighty-four percent of the patients were observed, 2 patients received anticoagulation, 2 patients received surgical repair, and 3 patients received stenting. Twenty-three of 25 cases treated with observation exhibited no change or improvement/resolution (2/25) with 20.9-month mean follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Most isolated celiac and SMA dissections were asymptomatic/incidental, supporting observation and surveillance with intervention reserved for vascular compromise. Interactive multiplanar reconstruction/maximum intensity projection/3D rendering can increase diagnostic sensitivity.

Management of isolated spontaneous dissection of superior mesenteric artery

PURPOSE

Our objectives were to clarify the management of isolated spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (DSMA).

METHODS

We reviewed seven patients diagnosed as having DSMA from 2002 to 2007 (group A). Simultaneously, we analyzed 50 cases of DSMA previously reported in the literature between 2000 and 2008 (group B). In each group, clinical presentation, Sakamoto's classification, imaging appearances, need for emergent surgery, failure of medical management, and long-term outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

In group A, according to Sakamoto's classification, there were two type I, two type II, and three type III. Two patients needed surgery (one type II, one type III). In group B, according to Sakamoto's classification, there were seven type I, five type II, 14 type III, and six type IV. Intestinal revascularization was necessary for 21 patients, especially for types II and III, while medical management was more frequent for types I and IV. We identified four indications for intestinal revascularization: acute mesenteric ischemia with mesenteric thrombosis, arterial rupture, chronic mesenteric ischemia with superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenosis, and SMA dissecting aneurysm of at least 2 cm in diameter. If abdominal pain lasts for more than 1 week, types I and IV were able to be medically managed, whereas intestinal revascularization has to be considered in types II and III.

CONCLUSION

Patients with symptoms lasting for more than 1 week, aneurysmal dilatation more than 2 cm in diameter, and SMA stenosis are suitable candidates for surgical management.

Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection - Report of two cases

Two cases of isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection diagnosed by contrast enhanced 64 slice CT are reported. In both, the dissection was seen extending along the entire length of the artery with one of them showing partially thrombosed false lumen. One case was associated with dissection of left renal artery with consequent renal infarcts. Although superior mesenteric artery dissection is a rare phenomenon, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of abdominal angina.